Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at White Oak Rehabilitation And Nursing Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment, hemiplegia, dysphagia, and multiple other complex conditions repeatedly called out for help for 29 minutes without staff response. The care plan identified the resident as a fall risk and dependent for transfers, with interventions to keep items within reach and remind use of the call light, yet during the incident the call light was on the floor and unreachable. Staff interviews confirmed they heard the resident yelling but did not intervene, assuming others were addressing the situation, while the unit manager acknowledged awareness of the calls and that staff were occupied elsewhere. The DON later confirmed awareness of the event and that staff involvement in another situation contributed to the delay in responding.
A resident with a G-tube and multiple neurologic and gastrointestinal diagnoses was ordered NPO with enteral feeding only, with instructions to check gastric residuals before feeding and to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions for high-contact care. During an observed tube-feeding procedure, an RN did not perform hand hygiene, did not check gastric residuals as ordered, failed to use required PPE, and repeatedly touched bed controls, linens, the over-bed table, the door, a water pitcher, and bathroom fixtures with the same pair of gloves before handling the feeding tube. The RN placed a flushing syringe on the resident’s linens and reused it, did not clean the bedside table before placing supplies, and did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene at any point, which facility leadership later confirmed did not meet expected infection control and tube-feeding practices.
A portion of a unit was locked following an elopement, resulting in multiple residents being unable to exit freely and requiring staff assistance to leave. Several cognitively intact residents confirmed they did not have the code to open the door, and there was no documentation supporting the need for these restrictions. One resident, distressed by the confinement, sustained fractures while attempting to exit the locked area.
Several residents with cognitive impairment and high risk for elopement or wandering were not properly supervised, resulting in unsupervised exits from the facility and repeated incidents of residents entering others' rooms. Additionally, residents who required supervision while smoking were observed smoking unsupervised and without required safety equipment, and care plans did not consistently address noncompliance or provide adequate interventions.
Four residents did not have Advance Directives or documentation that information about Advance Directives was offered in their medical records. A staff member confirmed that the process to provide and document this information had not been done consistently.
Surveyors identified multiple deficiencies in the facility's housekeeping and maintenance, including unsecured bathroom fixtures, unsealed toilets, foul-smelling substances, damaged walls, and unclean windows. A resident was found in a room with cobwebs and debris in the window, and another had duct tape on the chair railing near the bed. These conditions compromised the sanitary and homelike environment expected for residents.
Several residents did not have complete, individualized care plans addressing their specific needs, including dental care, hospice status, elopement risk, and smoking safety. For example, a resident requiring dental extractions had no care plan for dental issues, another on hospice care lacked an updated care plan, and residents at high risk for wandering or with smoking safety needs did not have appropriate interventions documented in their care plans.
Surveyors found that dry goods such as flour, rice, and sugar were stored past their labeled expiration dates, and an opened bag of frozen pepperoni in the kitchen freezer was not labeled with the date it was opened or its expiration date, contrary to facility policy and professional food safety standards.
A resident reported that the Business Office was holding mail for an extended period. Interviews confirmed that a backlog of undelivered mail had accumulated because the previous Business Office Manager worked remotely and was not present to distribute mail. The facility's policy requires prompt forwarding of mail to residents.
Two residents experienced loss of property and funds due to staff actions. In one case, a resident's controlled pain medication went missing after multiple LPNs failed to properly count and document controlled substances during shift changes. In another case, a resident loaned money to a GNA after an ATM withdrawal, but the GNA did not repay the loan and avoided further contact.
A resident was transferred to a hospital without receiving written notification of the facility's bed-hold policy, and staff confirmed that no such documentation was provided prior to the transfer.
A resident was observed uncovered in bed with an exposed brief and only a partially drawn privacy curtain, making them visible to others in the room. The GNA involved admitted the curtain should have been fully closed, and the resident stated that staff never close the curtain, demonstrating a lack of attention to privacy and dignity.
A resident with dementia and a history of elopement, who was assessed as high risk and had a wander guard in place, was not accurately coded for wandering behavior or the use of a wander guard in the MDS assessment. Despite documented interventions and observations, the MDS failed to reflect the resident's actual condition and care needs.
A resident was not offered the opportunity to participate in care planning meetings following multiple MDS assessments, as required. Record review and staff interviews confirmed that care plan meetings were not held after several quarterly and annual assessments, resulting in the resident and their representative not being included in the care planning process.
A resident admitted after a stroke did not have a cardiology follow-up appointment scheduled as ordered by the physician. Due to a breakdown in communication and process, the appointment was not scheduled within the required timeframe, resulting in a failure to meet professional standards of care.
A resident did not receive a prescribed dose of Lacosamide 150mg as ordered by the physician. Review of medication records and a controlled substance count revealed a discrepancy between the number of tablets in the blister pack and the count sheet, and staff confirmed the medication had not been administered during the shift.
A resident's controlled substance medication, Lacosamide 150mg, was not accurately reconciled when the number of tablets in the blister pack did not match the controlled substance count sheet. Staff signed off on the shift count without performing the required dual count with another nurse, and the medication was not administered as documented.
A resident who required multiple dental extractions and expressed difficulty eating was not provided with timely dental care, despite a Prosthodontist's evaluation and recommendation. Staff interviews revealed a lack of awareness and follow-up, with cost and insurance issues cited as reasons for the delay.
Multiple deficiencies were identified in the facility's medical record-keeping, including incorrect or incomplete cognitive assessments, inconsistent documentation of care such as bathing, and delayed or inaccurately recorded medication administration. These issues resulted in conflicting or missing information in residents' records, failing to meet professional standards for medical documentation.
A resident with a tracheostomy was repeatedly observed with their extension tubing and drainage bag stretched across the floor and connected to their trach collar. Staff and the infection preventionist confirmed that this was not in accordance with infection control protocols, but the issue continued despite being reported.
Surveyors observed that two resident bathrooms had maintenance issues, including a missing cove base and peeling paint on the floor. These deficiencies were confirmed during interviews with the NHA and ADON.
The facility did not report allegations of abuse and misappropriation of resident property within the required timeframes. In three reviewed incidents, including a resident's report of stolen money and two separate abuse allegations, notifications to the State Agency were delayed beyond regulatory requirements, and follow-up with the affected resident was not conducted.
Nurse staffing information was not posted in a location that was easily accessible to all residents and visitors on the Med Bridge unit. The staffing schedule was placed on the locked side of the unit, making it difficult for 17 residents on the unlocked side to view, and staff confirmed the information was not readily visible.
Failure to Respond Timely to Resident’s Repeated Calls for Help
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure timely staff response to a resident’s repeated verbal calls for assistance. The resident had multiple complex diagnoses, including hemiplegia following cerebral infarction, dementia with behavioral disturbance, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, dysarthria, psychosis, spinal stenosis, disc degeneration, adult failure to thrive, anxiety disorder, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and an artificial urinary opening. The care plan identified the resident as a fall risk related to weakness and noted severe cognitive impairment, dependence for bed-to-chair transfers, an indwelling catheter, and bowel incontinence. Interventions included placing common items within reach and reminding the resident to use the call light for assistance with ADLs. On the day of the incident, the surveyor observed the resident calling out loudly for help from their room. Over a 29-minute period, no staff responded to the resident’s repeated verbal calls for assistance. During this time, the surveyor inquired at the front desk about the location of the nurse or GNA for the unit, but no staff were visible in the area. The unit manager later stated that there were five GNAs and two nurses scheduled, but one GNA was working as the scheduler and another had left the floor, and that staff were in other residents’ rooms. The manager acknowledged awareness that the resident was yelling for help and commented that the resident usually yells like that. Interviews with staff confirmed that they heard the resident calling out but did not respond. One CNA, who was observed sitting at a desk, stated that they heard the resident screaming but assumed the unit manager or others were addressing it and acknowledged that the resident’s call light was on the floor and unreachable. This CNA stated that the typical response when a resident calls for help is to attend and determine what is needed, and admitted they could have gone back to the room more times to assist. The unit manager later acknowledged that staff, including themselves, should have checked on the resident when they were yelling for help. The DON also stated awareness of the incident and noted that the unit manager and other staff were involved in a situation at the time, contributing to the delay in addressing the resident’s needs.
Failure to Follow Infection Control and Tube-Feeding Orders During G-Tube Care
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure staff followed infection prevention and control practices and physician orders during gastrostomy tube care for one resident receiving enteral feeding. The resident had diagnoses including gastrostomy malfunction, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, esophagitis with bleeding, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, and was ordered NPO with G-tube feeding only. Physician orders required checking gastric residuals prior to feeding and following specific parameters if residuals exceeded 120 mL, as well as adherence to Enhanced Barrier Precautions for high-contact care such as tube feeding. During an observed tube-feeding procedure, the assigned RN did not perform hand hygiene before donning gloves, did not check gastric residuals prior to feeding as ordered, and did not follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions, including required PPE. During the same observation, the RN touched bed controls, linens, the over-bed table, the resident’s door, water pitcher, restroom door handle, and faucet with the same pair of gloves, without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene, and then handled the feeding tube. The RN placed a syringe used for flushing directly on the resident’s linens and reused it, and did not clean the bedside table before placing supplies. The RN also closed the resident’s door with gloved hands and did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene at any point during the procedure. In subsequent interviews, the RN acknowledged not performing their usual steps of hand hygiene, checking residuals, cleaning the bedside table, or following the expected door-closing protocol, and facility leadership confirmed that the observed practices did not align with expected infection prevention and tube-feeding procedures.
Involuntary Seclusion and Resident Harm Due to Locked Unit
Penalty
Summary
Residents in the Med Bridge unit were subjected to involuntary seclusion when a portion of the unit was locked, restricting their ability to move freely. This action was initiated following an elopement incident, and as a result, 15 residents were confined behind a locked door without documented clinical justification for such restriction. Among these, three residents with intact or moderately impaired cognition confirmed they did not have the code to exit and required staff assistance to leave the unit. There was no evidence in their records indicating a need for placement in a secure, locked environment. The remaining residents were not interviewable and also lacked documentation supporting the necessity for such confinement. One resident experienced significant distress due to the locked environment, resulting in self-inflicted physical harm while attempting to exit the unit. This resident was observed banging on the locked doors and subsequently sustained acute fractures, requiring hospital treatment. Staff interviews confirmed that the locked unit was established as a temporary measure for wandering residents, but no individualized assessments or documentation supported the restriction for the affected residents.
Failure to Prevent Accidents Due to Inadequate Supervision and Hazard Controls
Penalty
Summary
Multiple deficiencies were identified related to the facility's failure to ensure a safe environment free from accident hazards and to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Several residents with cognitive impairments and high risk for elopement or wandering were not properly supervised or monitored. In one instance, a resident with severe cognitive impairment and a high elopement risk was able to exit the facility unsupervised due to malfunctioning wander guard systems and inadequate staff response to door alarms. Staff failed to confirm the resident's presence after an alarm was triggered, resulting in the resident being found offsite by emergency services and returned to the facility. The facility also failed to properly assess, supervise, and monitor residents during smoking activities. Residents who were identified as dependent smokers, or who had cognitive impairments, were observed smoking unsupervised in facility courtyards. In several cases, residents did not use required safety equipment such as smoking aprons/blankets, and independent smokers were observed assisting dependent smokers in violation of facility policy. Care plans for these residents did not consistently address noncompliance with smoking policies or provide adequate interventions for their supervision needs. Additionally, residents with known wandering behaviors were not effectively monitored or provided with updated care plan interventions following repeated incidents of entering other residents' rooms and engaging in altercations. Despite documented incidents of wandering and aggressive behavior, care plans were not revised to include additional safety measures. Staff interviews confirmed that expectations for monitoring were not consistently met, and multiple incidents occurred where residents with severe cognitive impairment wandered into unsafe situations or other residents' rooms without timely staff intervention.
Failure to Offer and Document Advance Directive Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that four residents were offered information regarding Advance Directives, as required. During a record review, it was found that there was neither an Advance Directive nor documentation indicating that information about Advance Directives had been offered to these residents in their electronic medical records. When the surveyor inquired about the missing documentation, a staff member acknowledged that an audit had been started to identify residents needing Advance Directives and that outreach to residents and responsible parties had begun, but this process had not been performed consistently. The absence of both the Advance Directives and documentation of having offered the information was confirmed for the four residents reviewed.
Failure to Maintain Sanitary and Safe Resident Environment
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed multiple deficiencies related to the facility's failure to maintain a safe, clean, and homelike environment for residents. During observation rounds, several resident bathrooms were found with significant maintenance and cleanliness issues, including sinks loosely hanging from walls, toilets lacking proper seals with visible brown discoloration and holes at the base, bathroom floors with foul-smelling brown substances, ripped wallpaper, and separated door frames that compromised safe use. Additional concerns included brown stains on bathroom walls, missing drywall around exhaust fans, and marred walls under residents' TVs. These issues were identified in multiple rooms across both the east and west wing units. Further observations included the use of duct tape on chair railings near residents' beds and the presence of cobwebs, dead insects, and dirt between window screens and glass in resident rooms. Residents were present in the affected rooms at the time of the observations, and one resident reported a preference for keeping the window open, which revealed the unclean condition. The facility staff, including the Nursing Home Administrator, were made aware of these findings during the survey.
Failure to Develop and Implement Comprehensive, Person-Centered Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement complete, person-centered care plans to address the medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs of several residents. One resident expressed a desire for dental extractions and was evaluated by a prosthodontist, who recommended full mouth rehabilitation and surgical extractions. Despite this, the resident's care plan did not address their dental issues, and there was no evidence of a care plan to meet these needs. Another resident was admitted to hospice care, but their care plan was not updated to reflect their hospice status, as confirmed by staff and medical record review. For residents assessed as high risk for elopement or wandering, the facility did not consistently include appropriate interventions in their care plans. One resident with a high elopement risk and a physician order for a Wander Guard device did not have a care plan focus for wandering or exit-seeking behaviors. Another resident's care plan was not updated to reflect changes in monitoring orders for their wander prevention band, despite documentation of behavioral monitoring and device checks in the medical record. Additionally, a resident with ataxia and muscle weakness, who was identified as requiring supervision and a smoking apron/blanket while smoking, was repeatedly observed smoking without supervision and without the required protective equipment. The care plan for this resident did not include the need for a smoking apron/blanket, as indicated in the smoking safety screen. Staff interviews confirmed that residents were non-compliant with the smoking policy, and the care plan did not fully address the resident's safety needs during smoking activities.
Failure to Store and Label Food According to Professional Standards
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. During observation rounds with a dietary aide, sealed bins of white flour, white rice, brown rice, and sugar were found in the kitchen's dry goods storage room with expired use-by dates clearly labeled on them. Specifically, the white flour, white rice, brown rice, and sugar all had use-by dates that had already passed. Additionally, in the kitchen's freezer, an opened bag of frozen pepperoni was found without any labeling to indicate when it was opened or when it would expire. Interviews with the Dietary Director and Regional Food Service Director confirmed the presence of expired dry goods and the unlabeled opened frozen pepperoni. The facility's Food Storage Chart policy was reviewed and states that expiration dates printed by the manufacturer apply until the food product is opened, after which specific timeframes for safe use are outlined. The policy also requires that opened food items be labeled with the date they were opened to determine expiration, which was not followed in the case of the pepperoni.
Failure to Promptly Distribute Resident Mail
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents received their mail in a timely manner, as required by facility policy. A complaint was reviewed indicating that a resident reported the Business Office was holding resident mail longer than appropriate. Interviews with the Business Office Manager revealed that when they began working at the facility, there was a backlog of undelivered resident mail due to the previous manager working remotely and not being present to distribute mail. The current Business Office Manager confirmed that they found and distributed the backed-up mail upon starting their position. Facility records, specifically the Resident Handbook, state that mail and other deliveries are to be promptly forwarded to residents.
Failure to Protect Residents' Property and Funds
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect residents' property from loss in two separate incidents. In the first case, a resident's controlled pain medication, Oxycodone IR 5mg, was reported missing from the medication cart. The medication was received and signed for by an LPN, then handed off to other LPNs during shift changes. During these transitions, required counts of controlled medications were not performed, and the medication cart keys were exchanged without proper verification. The missing medication and its corresponding documentation were discovered the following morning when a nurse attempted to administer the medication and found it absent. In the second incident, a resident reported giving personal bank cards to a GNA to withdraw cash from an ATM. After returning the money and cards, the GNA requested and received a loan of $260 from the resident, with a verbal agreement to repay it. The GNA subsequently avoided contact and did not return the money as agreed. The incident was confirmed by facility staff during interviews.
Failure to Provide Written Bed-Hold Policy Notification Prior to Hospital Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide written notification of its bed-hold policy to a resident or the resident’s representative prior to the resident’s transfer to a hospital. Medical record review showed that, before the resident was transferred in August 2024, there was no documentation indicating that the required written notification was given. Staff interviews confirmed that neither the resident nor the representative received the facility’s bed-hold policy paperwork or documentation before the transfer occurred.
Failure to Ensure Resident Privacy and Dignity During Care
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to maintain a dignified and respectful environment for a resident during morning care. During observation rounds, the resident was found lying in bed with the bed raised to its highest position, uncovered, and with a yellow brief exposed. The privacy curtain was only partially drawn, allowing the resident to be visible to their roommate and anyone entering the room. When interviewed, the Geriatric Nursing Assistant acknowledged that the curtain should have been fully closed. The resident reported that staff never close the curtain, indicating a pattern of not ensuring privacy during care.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Resident with Elopement Risk
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for a resident with a history of elopement and high risk for wandering. The resident, who had dementia and impaired safety awareness, was observed multiple times wearing a wander guard and walking around the facility. Documentation confirmed that the resident had previously eloped from the facility and was subsequently assessed as high risk for elopement, with a care plan and interventions in place, including the use of a wander guard and regular monitoring by nursing staff. Despite these documented risks and interventions, the quarterly MDS assessment did not accurately reflect the resident's wandering behavior or the use of a wander guard. The assessment failed to code for wandering in Section E and did not indicate the use of a wander guard in Section P. This inaccuracy was confirmed by the MDS Coordinator during an interview, acknowledging that the resident's behaviors and interventions were not properly documented in the MDS assessment.
Failure to Hold Timely Care Plan Meetings After MDS Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents were offered the opportunity to participate in their care planning process by not holding timely care plan meetings following comprehensive MDS assessments. Specifically, for one resident, care plan meetings were not conducted after quarterly and annual MDS assessments on three separate occasions, as confirmed by both record review and staff interviews. The care plan meetings are intended to involve the resident and/or their representative and are required to be held after each comprehensive assessment to summarize health conditions, care needs, and treatments. Interviews with the social worker revealed an ongoing issue with the timeliness of care plan meetings, with the staff member acknowledging that some meetings were overdue and in the process of being completed. Documentation reviewed by the surveyor confirmed the absence of care plan meetings for the resident following the specified MDS assessments, and no evidence was provided to show that the resident or their representative participated in the care planning process during those times.
Failure to Schedule Cardiology Follow-Up as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a resident, who had been admitted to the facility following a hospitalization for a stroke, did not have a cardiology follow-up appointment scheduled as ordered by the physician. The physician's order, dated 2/15/2025, specified that the resident should follow up with a cardiologist in 12 weeks. Upon review of the resident's electronic medical record and interviews with staff, it was found that there was no documentation of the appointment being scheduled within the required timeframe. Interviews with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and the unit clerk revealed that the process for scheduling appointments relies on the unit manager to inform the unit clerk of any required appointments, as the unit clerk does not have access to the electronic health record to view orders. The unit clerk only became aware of the need for the cardiology appointment on 4/22/2025 and scheduled it for a later date, well after the original order. This failure to ensure timely scheduling of the follow-up appointment resulted in the facility not meeting professional standards of care for the resident.
Failure to Administer Medication as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a resident did not receive their prescribed medication, Lacosamide 150mg, as ordered by the physician. Medical record review showed an active order for the resident to receive Lacosamide 150mg by mouth twice daily. During observation and medication cart review, it was found that the controlled substance blister pack contained 8 tablets, while the facility's controlled substance count sheet indicated there should have been 7 tablets remaining after the previous dose was reportedly administered the night before. Staff interview confirmed that the resident had not yet received the medication during the current shift and that the blister pack count did not match the count sheet, indicating a failure to administer the medication as ordered.
Failure to Accurately Reconcile Controlled Substance Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately reconcile a resident's controlled substance medication, specifically Lacosamide 150mg, as required. Medical record review showed a physician's order for the resident to receive Lacosamide 150mg twice daily. On review of the medication cart and the resident's blister pack, there were 8 tablets present, while the controlled substance count sheet indicated there should have been 7 tablets remaining after the last documented administration. The count sheet showed that staff had signed off that the medication was administered and the count was correct, but this did not match the actual number of tablets in the blister pack. Further investigation revealed that the shift count sheet for the controlled substances was signed off by one staff member without completing the count with another nurse, as required during shift changes. Staff interview confirmed that the count was incorrect and that the medication had not been administered as documented. The staff member also acknowledged that the shift count sheet should not have been signed without a dual count at the time of shift change.
Failure to Provide Timely Dental Care for Resident
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to ensure that a resident received necessary dental care. The resident expressed to staff a desire to have teeth extracted due to only being able to eat soft foods. The resident had previously been evaluated by a Prosthodontist, who recommended several surgical extractions and noted the resident's strong interest in dental implants. Despite this, there was no evidence that the recommended dental procedures were arranged or provided in a timely manner. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of awareness and follow-up regarding the resident's dental needs. The unit manager acknowledged the resident's request but did not indicate any immediate action. The Administrator cited the high cost of the dental work and lack of insurance as reasons for the delay. The Business Office Manager was unaware of the dental issue until informed by the surveyor, indicating a breakdown in communication and coordination among staff regarding the resident's dental care needs.
Failure to Maintain Accurate and Complete Medical Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards for multiple residents. In several cases, cognitive assessments such as the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) were either incorrectly scored or not completed properly, leading to inconsistent documentation of residents' cognitive status. For example, one resident's BIMS score was entered as 99, indicating the interview could not be completed, yet the assessment showed the resident was able to answer questions, suggesting severe impairment. Additionally, smoking safety screens for these residents contained conflicting or missing information regarding cognitive loss and dexterity, with some questions left blank or answered inaccurately. Another deficiency was identified in the documentation of care provided, such as bathing. For one resident, the electronic medical record indicated a shower was given, while the corresponding shower sheet documented a bed bath instead, showing a discrepancy in the records. This inconsistency in documentation raises concerns about the accuracy of care records and the facility's ability to track the actual care provided to residents. Medication administration records also revealed deficiencies. A resident reported not receiving medications on time or at all, and a review of the electronic medical record and medication administration audit showed that medications were often administered and documented at times significantly later than ordered. Despite the medication administration record indicating that medications were given, the audit revealed delays and inconsistencies in the timing of administration and documentation. These findings demonstrate a failure to maintain accurate, timely, and complete medical records for residents, as required by professional standards.
Tracheostomy Tubing and Drainage Bag Found on Floor
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that a resident with a tracheostomy had their extension tubing and drainage bag stretched across the floor and connected to their trach collar on multiple occasions. These observations occurred during several visits to the resident's room, where the oxygen delivery system was located along the wall and the tubing and drainage bag were seen in direct contact with the floor. Staff interviews confirmed that the tracheostomy extension tubing and drainage bag should not be touching the floor, yet the issue persisted even after it was brought to the attention of a unit manager. The infection preventionist also acknowledged that the tubing and drainage bag should not be on the floor.
Environmental Safety and Maintenance Deficiencies in Resident Bathrooms
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe and comfortable environment for residents, as evidenced by observations made during facility rounds. Specifically, in two resident bathrooms, one was found to have a missing cove base at the bottom of the wall, and another had peeling paint on the floor. These deficiencies were directly observed by surveyors and subsequently brought to the attention of the Nursing Home Administrator and the Assistant Director of Nursing during staff interviews. No information was provided regarding the medical history or condition of the residents using these bathrooms at the time of the deficiency.
Failure to Timely Report Abuse and Misappropriation Allegations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to timely report allegations of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of resident property as required by regulations. In one instance, a resident reported that $20.00 was stolen from their room, but the facility did not follow up with the resident or report the incident to the Office of Health Care Quality or other appropriate agencies within 24 hours. Documentation showed that the facility was aware of the missing money on 10/03/24, but the incident was not reported until brought to the attention of staff by a surveyor several months later. Staff interviews confirmed that the report was not made in a timely manner. Additionally, the facility failed to report two separate allegations of abuse within the required two-hour timeframe. In one case, the Assistant Director of Nursing was notified of possible abuse at midnight, the Nursing Home Administrator was informed at 7am, but the initial report to the State Agency was not submitted until 3:15pm. In another case, the DON was made aware of an abuse allegation at 11am, the administrator at 11:30am, and the report was submitted at 4pm, all outside the mandated two-hour window. These failures were identified during a review of 19 facility-related incident reports, with three incidents not reported in accordance with regulatory requirements.
Failure to Prominently Post Nurse Staffing Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to post the required daily nurse staffing information in a prominent and readily accessible location for all residents and visitors on the Med Bridge unit. During observation rounds, it was noted that the staffing information was posted on the locked side of the unit, visible only through a slim window, making it difficult for most ambulatory residents and visitors on the unlocked side to view. This deficiency affected 17 out of 32 residents who resided on the unlocked portion of the unit. Staff confirmed that the information was not easily accessible to all residents and explained that staff verbally inform residents of their assigned caregivers at the start of each shift.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,318 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 12 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Hyattsville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete Care At Hyattsville | 1.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 57 | 0 |
| Sligo Creek Healthcare | 1.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 1 |
| Sacred Heart Home Inc | 1.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Ascension Living Carroll Manor | 1.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 1 |
| The Hsc Pediatric Skilled Nursing Facility | 1.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for White Oak Rehabilitation And Nursing Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.