Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0603
J

Involuntary Seclusion and Resident Harm Due to Locked Unit

Hyattsville, Maryland Survey Completed on 04-29-2025

Penalty

Fine: $117,715
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Residents in the Med Bridge unit were subjected to involuntary seclusion when a portion of the unit was locked, restricting their ability to move freely. This action was initiated following an elopement incident, and as a result, 15 residents were confined behind a locked door without documented clinical justification for such restriction. Among these, three residents with intact or moderately impaired cognition confirmed they did not have the code to exit and required staff assistance to leave the unit. There was no evidence in their records indicating a need for placement in a secure, locked environment. The remaining residents were not interviewable and also lacked documentation supporting the necessity for such confinement. One resident experienced significant distress due to the locked environment, resulting in self-inflicted physical harm while attempting to exit the unit. This resident was observed banging on the locked doors and subsequently sustained acute fractures, requiring hospital treatment. Staff interviews confirmed that the locked unit was established as a temporary measure for wandering residents, but no individualized assessments or documentation supported the restriction for the affected residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙