Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Coding for Resident with Elopement Risk

Hyattsville, Maryland Survey Completed on 04-29-2025

Penalty

Fine: $117,715
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for a resident with a history of elopement and high risk for wandering. The resident, who had dementia and impaired safety awareness, was observed multiple times wearing a wander guard and walking around the facility. Documentation confirmed that the resident had previously eloped from the facility and was subsequently assessed as high risk for elopement, with a care plan and interventions in place, including the use of a wander guard and regular monitoring by nursing staff. Despite these documented risks and interventions, the quarterly MDS assessment did not accurately reflect the resident's wandering behavior or the use of a wander guard. The assessment failed to code for wandering in Section E and did not indicate the use of a wander guard in Section P. This inaccuracy was confirmed by the MDS Coordinator during an interview, acknowledging that the resident's behaviors and interventions were not properly documented in the MDS assessment.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙