Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around April 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Momentous Health At Richfield during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Failure to document a wandering and disrobing incident involving two residents. One resident with schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, CHF, hepatitis C, diabetes, severe cognitive impairment, and wandering behaviors, and another resident with dementia, psychosis, COPD, diabetes, severe cognitive impairment, and verbal behaviors were involved in an event where one resident entered the other's room and both were found partially disrobed. CNA witness statements described the incident, but the DON verified there was no corresponding documentation in either resident's medical record.
The facility inaccurately coded PASRR status on MDS assessments for five residents. Each resident had a state PASRR level II evaluation showing serious mental illness, including diagnoses such as schizoaffective disorder, psychosis, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorder, yet the MDSs were marked “no” for current level II PASRR status. The DSS verified the incorrect coding.
PASRR Level II recommendations were not incorporated into the comprehensive care plans for four residents with serious mental illness. The residents had diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, psychosis, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder, with MDS findings ranging from cognitive intactness to severe cognitive impairment and active delusions. The PASRR evaluations called for psychiatric assessment and monitoring, behavior management and crisis intervention plans, therapy services, medication review, and socialization supports, but these items were not reflected in the care plans.
Environmental Cleanliness and Maintenance Deficiencies: Surveyors observed multiple issues with cleanliness and upkeep throughout the facility, including missing ceiling tiles above clean clothing storage, an outlet with exposed wiring, water-stained and sagging ceiling tiles, a soiled privacy curtain, stained flooring, a cracked wall, dead insects in a light fixture, a deteriorated heating unit cover, a dust-covered vent, peeling wallpaper, and missing privacy curtains in several resident rooms.
A resident received a NOMNC that was missing the QIO name and toll-free number needed to request an immediate appeal of discontinued skilled services. The notice included placeholder text instead of the required contact information, and the Administrator confirmed the omission.
Failure to prevent resident elopement and exit-seeking. Three residents with behavioral, psychiatric, or cognitive concerns were involved. One resident broke a window and left the room unnoticed before being found about a mile away. Another resident used a known door access code to leave the building and was later found about half a mile away. A third resident repeatedly exited through the front entrance and triggered the alarm, with staff repeatedly redirecting him back inside.
A resident with PTSD, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder had a documented childhood attack by pit bulls and ongoing flashbacks related to that event, but the trigger was not included in the care plan. Staff confirmed the PTSD trigger was not care planned, while the resident said he disliked dogs and was bothered by therapy dog visits. The facility also had monthly music activities with two therapy dogs, and the AD said the resident attended when the dogs were present and was informed beforehand.
Multiple deficiencies were identified, including unclean and poorly maintained resident rooms and common areas, inadequate hot water temperatures, and a lack of clean washcloths for resident care. Residents reported inconsistent cleaning and unaddressed maintenance requests, while observations confirmed soiled floors, broken fixtures, and pervasive odors throughout the facility.
Surveyors found that the facility did not consistently serve palatable meals at safe and appetizing temperatures. Food temperatures dropped significantly between preparation and service, and some residents received cold cereal and plastic spoons due to shortages. Two residents reported that meals were often cold and that the kitchen frequently ran out of food. Resident council minutes also documented concerns about repetitive meals and a lack of fresh fruit.
The facility did not ensure that all nurses providing direct care maintained current CPR certification, as required by their job descriptions. An LPN was found to have a gap in CPR certification, and this lapse could have affected all residents with full code status who required resuscitative measures. The DON confirmed that all nurses were expected to have current CPR certification.
A resident with multiple complex medical conditions experienced several significant changes in condition, including bleeding and respiratory distress, resulting in hospital transfers and returns. Despite special instructions and facility policy requiring notification, the POA was not informed of these events, as confirmed by medical record review and interviews with the resident and DON.
A resident with multiple complex medical conditions was not weighed upon readmission from the hospital, and there was no documentation of a refusal to be weighed. The last recorded weight was prior to hospitalization, and no new physician orders for weight monitoring were present. Facility policy required a weight to be obtained and documented within 24 hours of readmission, but this was not done.
Two residents with significant risk factors for pressure ulcers did not receive timely and comprehensive assessment, documentation, or intervention for skin integrity issues. One resident developed a Stage III pressure ulcer due to delayed prevention measures and lack of wound tracking, while another resident's in-house acquired pressure ulcer was not consistently measured or documented, and lacked appropriate PRN wound care orders. Facility policy requirements for wound assessment and care planning were not followed.
Multiple residents experienced harm due to the facility's failure to provide timely and necessary medical interventions after significant changes in condition, including persistent pain after a fall, untreated COVID-19 symptoms, and delayed diagnostic testing. In each case, staff did not follow up on ongoing symptoms, failed to administer ordered medications or obtain labs, and did not implement appropriate care planning or monitoring, resulting in hospitalizations and, in one case, death.
Two CNAs did not receive annual performance evaluations or the required 12 hours of in-service training, as confirmed by personnel file reviews and interviews with the COO. This lack of documentation and training had the potential to impact all 54 residents in the facility.
Surveyors found expired and unlabeled food items in the kitchen's walk-in cooler and dry stock room, including expired cream, lettuce, coleslaw, and thickened dairy beverages. A package of bologna was also found without a label or date. The Dietary Manager confirmed that required checks and documentation for expired food had not been completed as per facility policy, potentially affecting all residents receiving meals.
The facility failed to provide effective administrative oversight, resulting in repeated deficiencies including incomplete QAPI processes, lack of consistent infection control practices, environmental hazards, and unaddressed care concerns such as medication errors, privacy violations, and inadequate documentation of advance directives. Key staff and governing body members were not consistently involved in required meetings, and there was no evidence that action plans or PIPs were completed to address previously identified issues.
The facility's assessment contained incorrect information about its licensed capacity and was not implemented as required, resulting in incomplete staff training and missing annual evaluations for two CNAs. Not all staff received the mandated in-service education, and the deficiencies were confirmed by facility leadership.
The medical director did not fulfill required duties related to the coordination of medical care, implementation of facility policies, and participation in QAPI activities, as evidenced by a lack of documentation and oversight over a 12-month period. This deficiency impacted all residents in the facility.
The facility did not maintain an effective QAPI committee, as action plans for previously identified deficiencies—such as dignity, privacy, abuse reporting, medication errors, infection control, food storage, advance directives, and environmental concerns—lacked evidence of completion or follow-up. Repeat deficiencies were found during the annual survey, including issues with pressure ulcers, expired foods, and environmental hazards. Leadership interviews confirmed the absence of a reporting mechanism for staff and residents and a lack of documentation for QAPI activities.
The facility did not ensure that all required QAPI committee members, including the Medical Director, a governing body representative, and the Infection Preventionist (IP), attended quarterly meetings as required. Documentation showed repeated absences and missing records, and the facility could not provide evidence of IP certification for staff who temporarily filled the role. This deficiency affected all residents.
The facility did not ensure a qualified infection preventionist (IP) was consistently designated or present to oversee the infection prevention and control program. Review of QAPI meetings and staff records showed inconsistent IP participation, lack of documentation for required IP certification, and reliance on staff who were either not regularly onsite or unable to provide proof of qualifications. This affected all residents in the facility.
The facility did not ensure that residents were properly offered, screened, educated, or administered influenza and pneumococcal vaccines, and failed to document consent or declination as required. Multiple residents and their guardians reported not being informed or given the opportunity to receive these vaccines, and facility records lacked evidence of vaccine offers, education, or documentation. Some residents were hospitalized for pneumonia or COVID-19 complications, and in one case, a resident died after hospitalization for pneumonia. Facility leadership confirmed missing documentation and lack of awareness regarding vaccination processes.
The facility did not provide required education, screening, or offers of COVID-19 vaccination to residents and staff, nor did it document vaccination status, consent, or declination. Multiple residents with complex medical conditions and staff members were affected, with no evidence of vaccination management or communication with responsible parties or guardians.
Two CNAs did not receive required annual performance reviews, as shown by missing documentation in their personnel files. This was confirmed by facility leadership and meant that identified weaknesses could not be addressed through training as outlined in the facility's assessment.
Multiple residents experienced issues with cold or inconsistent water temperatures, non-functioning showers and toilets, and broken blinds. Observations revealed widespread maintenance problems, including damaged walls, chipped paint, missing furniture parts, and loose handrails. Staff reported a lack of maintenance personnel and no system for reporting or tracking repairs, with no maintenance records available for the past year.
Staff did not follow established menu portion sizes and dietary orders during meal service, resulting in residents on mechanical soft and low-concentrated sweets diets receiving incorrect portions of food and dessert. Dietary staff and management confirmed that serving utensils used did not match the required portions, and all residents received the same size dessert regardless of dietary restrictions.
Multiple residents reported that hot meals were served cold and unpalatable, with direct observation confirming that food temperatures dropped significantly between preparation and service. The Dietary Manager acknowledged that hot foods were not at the required minimum temperature at the point of service, affecting nearly all residents receiving meals.
Multiple failures in infection prevention and control were identified, including incomplete infection tracking, lack of adherence to local health department directives for a resident with an MDRO, inadequate COVID-19 outbreak surveillance and reporting, missing or insufficient legionella water management documentation, improper implementation of EBP and TBP for residents with wounds or medical devices, and failure to ensure TB screening for new employees. These deficiencies were observed through record reviews, staff interviews, and direct observations.
The facility did not maintain consistent or complete documentation of advance directives for several residents, resulting in discrepancies between electronic and paper medical records. In multiple cases, the EMR indicated a DNRCCA order while the paper record listed full code or lacked a signed DNR form, despite facility policy requiring regular review and accurate documentation of advance directives.
Several residents with complex medical conditions did not receive complete or accurate MDS assessments, as key sections for cognitive patterns, mood, and pain were left incomplete or marked as not assessed. The MDS Coordinator, working offsite, depended on other staff for information, but lack of coordination and timely interviews led to these deficiencies.
The facility did not develop or implement comprehensive, individualized care plans for several residents, resulting in missing or incomplete guidance for staff regarding ADL assistance, infection management, and advance directives. Some residents with complex medical and cognitive needs lacked integrated care plans, and care plans often contained placeholders instead of specific instructions, as confirmed by facility leadership.
The facility failed to implement individualized fall prevention interventions for two residents at high risk for falls, did not assess or investigate repeated incidents of a resident being found on the floor, and did not ensure proper disposal of cigarette butts in the smoking area, resulting in unsafe conditions despite existing policies.
Pharmacy recommendations for medication management, including adding stop dates, dose reductions, and clinical documentation for psychotropic and other medications, were not addressed or documented by staff or physicians for multiple residents. The DON confirmed that pharmacy recommendations were not available in medical records and had not been acted upon in a timely manner, contrary to facility policy.
Several residents with complex medical histories had outdated physician orders for COVID-19 contact and droplet precautions that remained active in their medical records and on the TAR, even after recovery. Nursing staff continued to sign off on these precautions, and observations confirmed the residents were not on such precautions. The DON and staff verified that the orders should have been discontinued, resulting in incomplete and inaccurate documentation.
Several dependent residents did not receive scheduled showers or assistance with bathing, as required by facility policy, due to missed care, lack of documentation, and non-functioning shower facilities. Interviews and record reviews revealed that some residents went weeks without showers, and staff were unable to provide documentation of care or refusals, despite procedures for recording such events.
The facility did not ensure proper antibiotic stewardship, as antibiotics were prescribed and administered to a resident for UTI symptoms without supporting lab evidence or meeting McGeer's Criteria. Additionally, infection control logs for multiple residents were incomplete, missing key details needed for tracking and trending infections. Staff confirmed gaps in documentation and reliance on physician orders even when criteria for infection were not met.
The facility did not obtain proper authorization or third-party witnessing for managing the personal funds of two residents, one with heart disease, anxiety, and dementia, and another with dementia and depression. In both cases, funds were managed without the required signatures from the residents or their representatives, and the facility's policy lacked clear procedures for authorization.
The facility did not ensure that personal funds belonging to two deceased residents were disbursed to their estates within the required timeframe. Both residents had significant fund balances remaining after their deaths, and the responsible staff member was unaware of the required process and timeframe for transferring these funds.
A resident with mental health and medical conditions was unable to access a phone in private, as required by his documented preferences. The only available phone was at the nurse's station and had to be used in a hallway, and an LPN denied the resident's repeated requests to use the phone due to being occupied with admissions. The facility did not have a policy on phone use or privacy.
A resident admitted with multiple fractures, encephalopathy, hallucinations, and alcohol withdrawal did not receive a nursing admission assessment as required. Review of the medical record confirmed the assessment was missing, and facility leadership verified this omission. No policy regarding nursing assessment timing was available.
A resident admitted with multiple fractures, encephalopathy, hallucinations, and alcohol withdrawal did not have a baseline care plan developed or implemented within 48 hours of admission, as required by facility policy. Review of records and staff interview confirmed the absence of this essential care planning step.
The facility did not update care plans to reflect changes in advance directives for three residents with complex medical conditions. Although the electronic medical records showed a DNRCCA status, the care plans and paper records continued to list these residents as full code. This discrepancy was confirmed by staff interviews and was not in accordance with facility policy requiring timely review and revision of care plans.
A resident with multiple medical conditions did not have an anchoring device in place for an indwelling urinary catheter, despite a care plan intervention requiring a leg strap. Observation showed the catheter tubing was under tension and the drainage bag was improperly positioned, with an LPN confirming the lack of an anchoring device and the DON verifying the absence of a facility catheter policy.
A resident requiring hemodialysis did not receive required pre- and post-dialysis assessments, and there was no effective communication or documentation exchanged between the facility and the dialysis center. Multiple LPNs and the DON confirmed the absence of assessment forms and communication sheets, and the facility lacked a valid, dated contract with the dialysis provider to ensure proper care coordination.
A resident with a history of behavioral issues was physically assaulted by another cognitively intact resident with a record of aggressive behaviors. The aggressor followed the victim in a motorized wheelchair and struck her repeatedly with a shoe, causing her to fall from her wheelchair and sustain a skin tear and pain. Witnesses confirmed the attack was unprovoked, and staff were not present to intervene. The facility's abuse prevention policy lacked specific protocols for responding to resident-to-resident abuse.
Two residents experienced failures in timely reporting and investigation of suspected misappropriation and injury of unknown origin. In one case, a cognitively intact resident reported a missing tablet and alleged staff involvement, but the incident was not reported promptly and the investigation was incomplete. In another case, a dependent resident with severe cognitive impairment suffered a fall and was later found to have a pelvic fracture, yet the facility did not report or investigate the injury as required. Staff interviews confirmed that reporting and investigation procedures were not followed according to policy.
The facility did not conduct thorough investigations into allegations of misappropriation and injury involving two residents. In one case, a resident's missing tablet was not fully investigated, with key interviews and documentation missing. In another case, a resident with cognitive impairment suffered a fall and subsequent pain, but the facility failed to review video evidence or interview the family member who reported concerns. Both incidents lacked comprehensive investigation as required by facility policy.
Three independent residents did not receive scheduled showers due to incomplete care plans, lack of documentation, and a broken shower room. One resident with COPD and heart failure had no shower records for over two months, another with psychiatric diagnoses had only one documented refusal and no other shower records, and a third with dementia was not included on the shower schedule and reported not bathing for three weeks. The DON confirmed missing documentation and scheduling errors.
A resident with multiple behavioral health diagnoses was not provided with necessary behavioral health care, as staff failed to implement care plan interventions such as diversional activities and engagement. The resident was repeatedly left in bed or on a floor mat, yelling for help, without staff addressing his behavioral needs. Staff interviews revealed a lack of understanding of behavioral interventions, and the facility was unable to provide a behavioral healthcare policy or evidence of adequate staff training.
Failure to Document Resident Wandering and Disrobing Incident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate documentation was recorded in the medical records of two residents. Resident #14 had diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, congestive heart failure, viral hepatitis C, and diabetes, and the MDS showed severe cognitive impairment and wandering behaviors. Review of progress notes for the period reviewed showed no documentation of an incident on 05/18/26 when Resident #57 wandered into Resident #14's room and was found with her brief and pants around her ankles. Resident #57 had diagnoses including dementia with moderate behavior disturbance, type II diabetes, psychosis, and COPD, and the MDS showed severe cognitive impairment and verbal behaviors. Review of the nursing progress notes and psychosocial assessment showed no documentation of the same 05/18/26 incident in which Resident #57 was found in Resident #14's room with her pants and brief pulled down around her ankles, while Resident #14 was wearing no pants or underwear. The facility investigation included a CNA witness statement describing the event, and the DON verified there was no documentation in either resident's medical record regarding the disrobing or wandering.
Inaccurate PASRR Coding on MDS Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately code PASRR status on the MDS 3.0 assessments for five residents. Record review showed that Residents #7, #13, #18, #25, and #34 each had a PASRR level II evaluation from the state department of mental health indicating a level II mental illness, yet the facility answered “no” to the MDS question asking whether the resident is currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness, intellectual disability, or a related condition. The residents’ records included diagnoses such as schizoaffective disorder, psychosis, mood disorder, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, insomnia, type 2 diabetes, and high cholesterol. The inaccurate coding was identified through review of the medical record and MDS assessments, and the Director of Social Service verified the inaccurate PASRR coding for all five residents during interview.
PASRR Recommendations Not Incorporated Into Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure recommendations from the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services PASRR Level II evaluations were incorporated into the comprehensive care plans for four residents. Resident #7 was admitted with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, type II diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia, and the most recent MDS showed severe cognitive impairment, active delusions, and a need for supervision with activities of daily living. The PASRR evaluation identified serious mental illness and recommended services including skills training, speech/language therapy evaluation, structured therapeutic activities, informal support from nursing facility staff, medication evaluation and monitoring by a facility-designated physician, socialization and recreational activities, vision, physical therapy, skin/wound, adaptive equipment, dementia or other organic mental disorder, nutritional, neurological, dental, and occupational therapy evaluations, but these recommendations were not incorporated into the resident's care plan. Resident #13 was admitted with schizoaffective disorder, type II diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia, and the MDS showed cognitive intactness with extensive assistance needed for activities of daily living. The PASRR evaluation found serious mental illness and recommended a comprehensive psychiatric assessment, crisis intervention plan, yearly or more frequent psychiatric evaluations, socialization and recreational activities, respiratory and skin/wound evaluations, ongoing medication review by a physician, and evaluation of psychotropic medication effectiveness, but these were not included in the care plan. Resident #18, admitted with psychosis, mood disorder, and major depressive disorder, had severe cognitive impairment and active delusions, and the PASRR evaluation recommended a behavior management safety plan, psychiatric evaluations, psychotropic medication monitoring, a behaviorally based treatment plan, individual psychotherapy, and case management for supported community living and transition planning; these were also not incorporated. Resident #34, admitted with insomnia, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder, was severely cognitively impaired and required supervision with ADLs, and the PASRR evaluation recommended crisis intervention, a behavior management safety plan, psychiatric evaluation, psychotropic medication monitoring, mental health counseling, a behaviorally based treatment plan, and individual psychotherapy, which were likewise not included in the comprehensive care plan. The Director of Social Services verified that the PASRR Level II recommendations for these residents had not been incorporated as required.
Environmental Cleanliness and Maintenance Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the environment remained clean, sanitary, hazard-free, and in a state of good repair. During observation of the laundry area, four ceiling tiles were missing directly above the area designated for clean clothing storage, exposing overhead structural beams and the open ceiling cavity. The Administrator confirmed during the observation that the ceiling tiles were missing and had not been replaced. During an environmental tour of resident care areas, multiple maintenance and cleanliness concerns were observed and verified with the Maintenance Director. These included an electrical outlet in one resident room missing its protective cover plate with internal wiring exposed, numerous ceiling tiles throughout hallways, dining rooms, and several resident rooms showing brown and yellow water stains and some sagging, a heavily soiled privacy curtain in one resident room, stained and discolored flooring in two resident rooms, a large vertical crack in a resident room wall, dead insects beneath a light fixture in the secured unit shower room, a heavily scuffed and deteriorated baseboard heating unit cover with peeling paint in the secured unit dining area, a dust-covered ceiling vent in the secured unit, peeling wallpaper in one resident room, and missing privacy curtains in several resident rooms.
Incomplete Medicare Non-Coverage Notice
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents received proper liability notices that included the required information for requesting an immediate appeal of discontinued skilled services. For Resident #62, the medical record showed a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage dated 11/11/25, but the notice did not include the name of the Quality Improvement Organization or its telephone number. In the section titled "How to ask for an immediate appeal," the notice contained placeholder language instructing the reader to call the QIO at "(insert QIO name and toll-free number of QIO)," showing the required information had not been completed before the notice was issued. The Administrator confirmed during interview on 05/05/26 at 7:40 A.M. that the QIO name and contact information were not included on the NOMNC issued to Resident #62.
Failure to Prevent Resident Elopement and Exit-Seeking
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and interventions were in place to prevent resident elopement and exit-seeking behaviors. This deficient practice involved three residents reviewed for elopement risk and was identified through medical record review, facility investigations, staff interviews, and review of facility-initiated corrective actions. One resident had diagnoses including personality disorder, bipolar disorder, adjustment disorder, and adult failure to thrive. Although the most recent MDS described the resident as cognitively intact and independent with activities of daily living, psychiatric documentation identified severe impairment in judgment and insight. The care plan documented significant behavioral concerns, including refusal of care and medications, aggression, destruction of property, and verbal aggression toward staff. Nursing documentation showed staff entered the resident’s room to administer medications and found the resident missing, with shattered glass from a broken window present. The resident had last been observed earlier that evening, and the facility investigation determined the resident had left the building and was later found approximately one mile away. A second resident had diagnoses including traumatic brain injury, alcohol dependence, and a history of suicidal behaviors. The resident’s MDS described the resident as cognitively intact and independent with activities of daily living, while care plan and psychiatric documentation identified impulsivity and safety concerns. Facility records showed that staff discovered the resident missing after finding a wheelchair outside the front entrance with the resident’s name labeled on it. The resident later told staff he had been able to leave the building because he knew the facility door access code, and police located the resident approximately one-half mile from the facility. A third resident had diagnoses including brain cancer, hallucinogen use, and epilepsy. The resident’s MDS described moderate cognitive impairment and independence with activities of daily living, and the care plan identified poor impulse control. Nursing documentation showed repeated exit-seeking behavior, including approaching and exiting through the front entrance and activating the door alarm multiple times. Staff observed the resident outside near the entrance area and redirected him back inside each time. The resident continued to attempt to leave the facility, and the record reflects ongoing exit-seeking behavior requiring increased supervision.
Failure to Care Plan Known PTSD Trigger
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to identify and incorporate known PTSD triggers into the care plan for one resident with bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and PTSD. The resident’s record showed a BIMS score of 10/15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment, and he was receiving Prazosin 2 mg nightly for PTSD. His psychosocial evaluation documented a history of being mauled by pit bulls, and later psychiatry and psychotherapy notes identified that he had been attacked by three pit bulls in childhood and continued to experience flashbacks related to that event. Despite this documented trigger, the mood-focused care plan did not include the trigger or interventions to prevent exposure to dogs during facility activities. Interviews confirmed the trigger was not care planned. The Director of Social Services and the Resident Review Nurse stated the resident’s PTSD trigger had not been incorporated into the care plan. The resident stated he did not like dogs and felt bothered when therapy dogs visited, and he reported staff did not keep the dogs away from him. The Activity Director stated the facility had a musician visit monthly with two therapy dogs, that the resident had attended music activities when the dogs were present, and that she informed him before the activity; she also stated she had observed him pet the dogs on occasion. Facility observations on multiple dates showed no dogs in the building, and the facility policy stated care plan interventions must address underlying sources of problems, not only symptoms or triggers.
Failure to Maintain Safe, Clean, and Homelike Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment for its residents, as evidenced by multiple ongoing issues with cleanliness, maintenance, and environmental conditions throughout the building. Observations and interviews revealed that rooms and common areas were not consistently cleaned, with soiled floors, stained and bulging ceiling tiles, missing or broken furniture, and pervasive odors present in several locations. Residents reported that their rooms were not cleaned regularly, and some had requested repairs or replacements, such as new mattresses or blinds, which had not been addressed. Additionally, there were instances of missing or soiled privacy curtains, broken light fixtures, and debris such as used medical supplies found in hallways. Water temperatures in resident bathrooms and shower rooms were found to be below the required minimum of 105 degrees Fahrenheit, with several logs and direct measurements confirming that hot water did not reach appropriate or homelike temperatures. This issue persisted despite facility policies requiring regular monitoring and maintenance of water temperatures. The lack of adequate hot water was confirmed by both staff and administrative personnel during the survey. The facility also failed to maintain an adequate supply of clean washcloths for resident use, with observations confirming that some shower rooms had no washcloths available and laundry staff reporting frequent shortages. The absence of clean linens and washcloths further contributed to the lack of a clean and comfortable environment for residents. These deficiencies were confirmed by facility leadership during the environmental tour and through review of facility policies, which require a clean, sanitary, and homelike setting for all residents.
Failure to Serve Palatable Meals at Safe and Appetizing Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to serve palatable meals at appetizing and safe temperatures to all residents, as evidenced by direct observation, interviews, and review of facility menus and policies. During breakfast service, initial food temperatures on the steam table were within safe ranges, but by the time trays were delivered to residents, food temperatures had dropped significantly, with items such as cheese omelets and sausage measuring between 106 and 118 degrees Fahrenheit, and milk at 65 degrees Fahrenheit. Additionally, the facility ran out of oatmeal and spoons during tray line, resulting in the last four residents receiving cold cereal and plastic spoons instead of the planned meal and standard utensils. A taste test confirmed the food was not warm enough and lacked desirable flavor, particularly the pureed omelet, which was described as bland and tasteless. Resident interviews corroborated these findings, with multiple residents reporting that meals were often cold and that the kitchen frequently ran out of food. Review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes further revealed ongoing concerns about repetitive meals and requests for more fresh fruit. The facility's own policy requires best efforts to present hot food hot and cold food cold at point of service, using appropriate equipment and periodic test tray evaluations, but these standards were not met during the observed meal service.
Failure to Maintain Current CPR Certification for Nursing Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all nurses providing direct care to residents maintained current cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) certification, as required by their job descriptions. Review of personnel files revealed that one LPN had a gap in CPR certification, with no evidence of active certification for a specific period. Interviews with the Business Office Manager and the LPN confirmed the lapse in certification, and it was further established that the LPN could be assigned to any unit within the facility. Additional review showed that other LPNs had previously had gaps in certification, but current documentation was eventually provided for them. This deficiency had the potential to affect all 37 residents in the facility who had advanced directives listed as full code, meaning they required all resuscitative measures, including CPR, if needed. The Director of Nursing confirmed that all facility nurses were expected to maintain current CPR certification, and the job description for LPNs also specified this requirement. The census at the time was 51 residents.
Failure to Notify POA of Change in Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the power of attorney (POA) of a resident's change in condition, as required by both the resident's special instructions and facility policy. The resident, who had diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, acute and chronic respiratory failure, obstructive sleep apnea, congestive heart failure, and morbid obesity, was dependent on staff for activities of daily living but had intact cognition. The medical record indicated that the POA requested to be notified of any behaviors or concerns. Despite this, there was no documented evidence that the POA was informed when the resident experienced significant changes in condition, including episodes of bleeding that required hospital transfer, worsening symptoms such as shortness of breath and grogginess, and subsequent returns from the hospital. Nursing progress notes showed that while medical staff and nurse practitioners were notified of the resident's condition changes and hospital transfers, the POA was not notified at any point during these events. Interviews with the resident and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the POA was not informed as required, and the facility's policy stated that the resident, physician, and family/POA/guardian should be promptly notified of changes in medical status. This deficiency was identified during a complaint investigation and affected one resident out of four reviewed for notification of change in condition.
Failure to Obtain and Document Resident Weight Upon Readmission
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain a weight for a resident upon readmission from the hospital and did not document any refusal to be weighed. The resident, who had diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, acute and chronic respiratory failure, obstructive sleep apnea, congestive heart failure, and morbid obesity, was dependent on staff for activities of daily living and had intact cognition. The last recorded weight for the resident was 536 pounds, taken prior to the hospital stay. Upon readmission, the nursing admission assessment and progress notes did not include a new weight or any documentation of the resident refusing to be weighed. Additionally, there were no physician orders for weight monitoring frequency following the resident's return from the hospital. The facility's policy required residents to be weighed within 24 hours of admission or readmission, then weekly for four weeks, and monthly thereafter, with all weights to be recorded and trended in the medical record. The Director of Nursing confirmed that no weight was obtained and no refusal was documented as required by policy.
Failure to Provide Adequate Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement an adequate and effective pressure ulcer prevention and treatment program for two residents with significant risk factors and existing wounds. For one resident, who was cognitively impaired, dependent on staff for activities of daily living, and incontinent, there was no initial care plan for skin integrity upon admission, despite the presence of skin tears and an open area to the coccyx. Nursing documentation lacked detailed assessment, staging, or description of the wound, and pressure ulcer prevention interventions were not initiated in a timely manner. Pressure relieving interventions and wound treatments were delayed, and comprehensive wound measurements and documentation were not performed until several weeks after admission, by which time the wound had deteriorated to a Stage III pressure ulcer. For another resident, who was also cognitively impaired, dependent on staff, and had multiple comorbidities, the facility failed to ensure accurate and comprehensive weekly skin assessments for an in-house acquired pressure ulcer. The wound nurse practitioner did not measure wounds, and there was a lack of consistent wound tracking and documentation. The resident's care plan included monitoring and documentation of wound status, but nursing notes and wound assessments frequently omitted measurements and detailed descriptions. Additionally, there was no PRN order for wound care in case the dressing needed to be changed outside of scheduled times, and hospice staff were responsible for dressing changes only on specific days. Facility policy required comprehensive assessment and documentation of all skin conditions, including location, stage, measurements, and presence of exudates or necrotic tissue, as well as regular physician evaluation and care plan updates. However, these requirements were not met for either resident, as evidenced by incomplete assessments, delayed interventions, and lack of proper wound tracking. Interviews with staff and review of records confirmed that wound measurements and documentation were not consistently performed, and care plans were not updated in a timely manner to address the residents' needs.
Failure to Provide Timely and Adequate Medical Intervention Following Change in Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely and necessary interventions following changes in condition for multiple residents, resulting in actual harm. One resident with Parkinson's disease, osteoporosis, and dementia experienced an unwitnessed fall and subsequently reported persistent pain in the left hip and groin. Despite ongoing complaints of pain, limited mobility, and inability to participate in therapy, the facility did not conduct further diagnostic evaluation after an initial negative x-ray. The resident's pain continued for over two weeks before being transferred to the hospital, where an acute pelvic fracture was diagnosed. Documentation revealed a lack of care planning for pain, insufficient follow-up on the resident's condition, and no evidence of an interdisciplinary review or root cause analysis of the fall and subsequent injury. Another resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, and dementia tested positive for COVID-19 and developed symptoms including cough, nasal congestion, nausea, vomiting, and loose stools. Orders for Dexamethasone and other treatments were not administered due to medication unavailability, and laboratory tests were not completed as ordered. The resident's condition deteriorated, with ongoing symptoms and dark, tarry stools, leading to hospitalization for pneumonia and subsequent death. Facility leadership and staff were unaware of the resident's hospitalization and death, and there was no evidence of appropriate monitoring or intervention in response to the resident's change in condition. A third resident with diabetes, bipolar disorder, and intellectual disabilities experienced prolonged symptoms of respiratory illness, including cough, congestion, vomiting, and diarrhea. Despite these symptoms, COVID-19 testing and other interventions were delayed or not performed, and laboratory tests were not obtained as ordered. The resident was eventually hospitalized for acute hypoxic respiratory failure, pneumonia, and COVID-19. Facility staff and leadership were unaware of the resident's hospitalization and the extent of the outbreak, and there was no evidence of a COVID-19 tracking log or outbreak management. Facility policies required monitoring and intervention for changes in condition, but these were not followed for the affected residents.
Failure to Complete CNA Performance Reviews and In-Service Training
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) received annual performance evaluations and the required 12 hours of in-service training. Review of the personnel files for both CNAs showed no documentation of annual performance reviews or evidence of completed in-service hours. The Chief Operating Officer confirmed during interviews that the facility was unable to provide records of these evaluations or training for the CNAs in question. The facility assessment indicated that areas of weakness identified in nurse aide performance reviews would be addressed through training and in-services, with topics including communication, resident rights, abuse, infection control, culture change, and dementia management. However, the lack of documented performance evaluations and in-service training for the CNAs had the potential to affect all 54 residents residing in the facility.
Expired and Unlabeled Food Found in Kitchen Storage
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed multiple instances of improper food storage and labeling in the facility's kitchen. During a walkthrough with the Dietary Manager, expired cartons of cream, bags of salad lettuce, and coleslaw were found in the walk-in cooler. Additionally, a package of bologna was discovered without a label or date. In the dry stock room, nine expired cartons of thickened dairy beverage were found intermixed with in-date products. The Dietary Manager confirmed these findings and stated that the first shift cook was responsible for checking and removing expired food, a task that should be documented on cleaning sheets. A review of the cleaning schedules revealed that the morning cook had not documented the removal of out-of-date items on certain days, with the last completion recorded several days prior to the observation. Facility policies require all foods to be labeled and dated to reduce the risk of foodborne illness and mandate the use of the First In, First Out (FIFO) method, discarding any items past their expiration date. These policies were not followed, resulting in expired and unlabeled food being stored in areas accessible for meal preparation, potentially affecting all residents receiving meals from the kitchen.
Failure of Facility Administration and Oversight Leading to Multiple Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure effective administration and oversight, resulting in multiple deficiencies affecting the care and well-being of all 54 residents. The Administrator and DON had recently assumed their positions, but review of job descriptions and interviews revealed a lack of comprehensive and effective administrative oversight. QAPI meeting minutes and sign-in sheets showed that the Medical Director and governing body members were not consistently present, and the Infection Preventionist's involvement was not documented. There were also missing QAPI meeting minutes for certain periods, and action plans from previous surveys lacked evidence of completion or follow-up, with repeat deficiencies identified during the current survey. Physical observations of the facility revealed environmental concerns, including loose hand-rails, broken blinds, discolored ceiling tiles, dented and chipped walls, and a broken shower room. The facility did not have a maintenance director at the time of the survey. Additionally, water temperatures throughout the facility were inconsistent and did not provide a comfortable, homelike environment for residents. The Housekeeping Director confirmed that water temperatures had not been routinely checked or recorded prior to the survey. The infection control program was found to be lacking, with no legionella water management program, incomplete infection tracking and trending logs, and inconsistent documentation of infection preventionist involvement. There were also issues with timely collaboration with the local health department regarding suspected infections and failure to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions as indicated. Documentation showed concerns with vaccine administration and advance directives, and there was no evidence that corrective actions or Performance Improvement Projects (PIPs) were completed for identified issues. During the survey, repeat deficiencies were found in areas such as privacy, reporting and investigating abuse, activities of daily living, quality of care, falls, medication errors, and infection control.
Inaccurate Facility Assessment and Incomplete Staff Training
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately complete and implement its facility-wide assessment, which is required to determine the necessary resources for competent resident care during both routine operations and emergencies. The assessment contained incorrect information regarding the facility's licensed capacity, listing 118 beds instead of the approved 72, and did not reflect the actual average daily census. This inaccuracy was confirmed by the Administrator during an interview. Additionally, the facility did not follow its own assessment regarding staff training and education. Review of in-service records showed that not all employees received the required trainings, and personnel files for two CNAs revealed they had not completed the mandated 12 hours of annual in-service education nor received annual performance evaluations as specified in the facility assessment. The COO and Administrator both verified the lack of required training and evaluations for these staff members.
Failure of Medical Director to Fulfill Oversight and Quality Assurance Responsibilities
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the medical director fulfilled responsibilities related to the coordination of medical care, implementation of facility policies and procedures, and participation in Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) activities. Review of documentation revealed that only one medical director report was available for a 12-month period, and this report did not document any concerns regarding resident care, such as pressure areas, falls, or changes in condition. The medical director, who had been in the role since July 2024, did not identify or communicate any issues related to the effective administration of the facility or areas needing attention to ensure appropriate care and services for residents. Interviews with facility leadership confirmed the lack of required documentation and oversight by the medical director, as well as a lack of evidence of participation in QAPI or the implementation of resident care policies. The medical director agreement and facility policy outlined specific responsibilities, including oversight of medical and clinical care, policy implementation, and active involvement in quality assessment activities, but these duties were not demonstrated in practice. This deficiency affected all 54 residents residing in the facility.
Failure to Implement Effective QAPI Committee and Follow Through on Corrective Actions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee that identified and addressed quality concerns in a timely and effective manner. Review of QAPI meeting minutes and Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) documentation revealed multiple action plans related to previous survey citations, including issues with dignity, privacy, quality of care, abuse reporting and investigation, activities of daily living, nutrition, medication errors, infection control, food storage, advance directives, and environmental concerns. However, these plans lacked evidence of completion, revision, or follow-up, as columns for completion dates and follow-up actions were consistently left blank. There was also no documentation to verify that corrective actions or PIPs were completed or that ongoing monitoring was conducted to prevent recurrence of identified issues. During the most recent annual survey, repeat deficiencies were found in several of the same areas previously cited, such as privacy, homelike environment, abuse reporting and investigation, activities of daily living, quality of care, falls, significant medication errors, infection control, expired and undated foods, advance directives, and pressure ulcers. For example, a resident with an in-house acquired pressure ulcer did not have their wound measured weekly as required, and concerns regarding pressure ulcers persisted. Additionally, environmental issues continued despite the initiation of an environmental PIP, and expired or undated foods were still present in the facility. Interviews with facility leadership, including the Administrator, DON, and COO, revealed that the QAPI process was not being effectively implemented. The COO was unaware that full PIPs, evidence of auditing, education, or other corrective measures were not completed for identified concerns. The Administrator confirmed that there was no mechanism in place for residents and staff to report issues to the QAPI program. The facility's QAPI policy stated that a comprehensive, data-driven program should be maintained, but documentation and evidence of ongoing QAPI activities were lacking.
Failure to Ensure Required QAPI Committee Members Attend Quarterly Meetings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all required members of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee attended meetings at least quarterly, as mandated. Review of QAPI meeting minutes and sign-in sheets from January 2024 through February 2025 showed that the Medical Director did not attend several meetings between March and July 2024, and a member of the facility's governing body was not present until January 2025. Additionally, there was no evidence that the Infection Preventionist (IP) was present at QAPI meetings as required, and the facility could not provide IP certification for staff who temporarily covered the IP role. There were also missing meeting records for November and December 2024. Facility policy required specific staff, including the Medical Director/Physician, Administrator, and others, to participate in QAPI meetings, but did not initially specify the IP as a required member. However, a later policy update clarified that the IP must attend each QAPI meeting and report on infection prevention and control. Despite this, sign-in sheets and interviews confirmed the IP's routine absence from QAPI meetings, and the facility was unable to provide documentation to show compliance with these requirements. This deficiency affected all 54 residents in the facility.
Failure to Designate a Qualified Infection Preventionist
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a qualified infection preventionist (IP) was designated and consistently responsible for the infection prevention and control program. Review of QAPI meeting sign-in sheets from March 2024 to February 2025 showed no consistent designation or participation of an IP, except for two months when the Chief Operating Officer (COO) was present. Interviews revealed that the facility did not have a current IP employed, and while the COO and Director of Nursing (DON) claimed to have IP certificates, only the COO could provide evidence of certification. The DON was unable to provide documentation of her IP certificate, and the personnel file for the former Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), who was reportedly the IP for several months, contained no evidence of IP certification. Further, the COO stated she was only present at the facility one day per week starting in January 2025, and the RN who assisted with infection prevention worked mostly offsite. This lack of a consistently present and qualified IP had the potential to affect all 54 residents in the facility, as there was no assurance that infection prevention and control measures were being properly overseen and implemented during the period reviewed.
Failure to Offer, Educate, and Document Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccinations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents were properly offered, screened, educated, and administered influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations as required by policy and CDC guidance. Record reviews revealed that there was no documented evidence of pneumococcal vaccinations, consent/declination forms, screenings, or education for any residents during the specified review period. For influenza vaccinations, while some residents were listed as having received or refused the vaccine, there was no documentation of consent, declination, or education for any of these cases. Interviews with the DON and other facility leadership confirmed the absence of required documentation and a lack of knowledge regarding the vaccination process, with missing forms and unclear responsibilities for ordering and administering vaccines. Several residents and their guardians reported not being offered or educated about influenza or pneumococcal vaccines upon admission or during their stay. In multiple cases, residents who would have accepted the vaccines were not given the opportunity, and guardians were not informed or consulted. The facility's immunization reports and medical records consistently lacked evidence of vaccine offers, education, or documentation of consent or refusal, even for residents with significant risk factors such as chronic respiratory conditions, dementia, or immunocompromised states. The facility's own policies required assessment, education, and documentation for both vaccines, but these procedures were not followed. The deficiency affected multiple residents, including those who were hospitalized for pneumonia or COVID-19-related complications, and in at least one case, a resident died after being hospitalized for pneumonia. Facility leadership, including the DON, Administrator, and Infection Preventionist, were unaware of the vaccination status or related hospitalizations for several residents. The lack of an effective system to manage and document vaccinations had the potential to affect all residents in the facility, as confirmed by the absence of records and interviews with staff and residents.
Failure to Educate, Offer, and Document COVID-19 Vaccinations for Residents and Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents and staff were educated, screened, and offered COVID-19 vaccinations as required by facility policy and CDC guidance. Medical record reviews, immunization reports, and staff vaccination records revealed no evidence of COVID-19 vaccinations being completed, nor documentation of consent, declination, screening, or education for any residents or staff during the specified review period. Interviews with the DON, Administrator, COO, and Infection Preventionist confirmed the absence of vaccination records and a lack of awareness regarding the handling of vaccinations by previous nursing leadership. Several residents with significant medical histories, including asthma, pulmonary embolism, dementia, end stage renal disease, COPD, and other chronic conditions, were not offered or educated about COVID-19 vaccinations. In multiple cases, responsible parties or guardians were not contacted or informed about vaccination opportunities. Residents who were their own responsible parties also reported not being offered vaccines or receiving any education on the subject during their stay. For some residents, there was no documentation of historical vaccination status, and for others, records showed they were not up to date with recommended COVID-19 vaccinations. The deficiency extended to staff, as evidenced by the lack of documentation showing that staff members were offered or educated about COVID-19 booster doses. The facility's failure to implement an effective vaccination management program affected all residents and staff, as confirmed by the absence of required documentation and the inability of facility leadership to provide additional information or records related to COVID-19 vaccination efforts.
Failure to Complete Annual CNA Performance Reviews
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) received annual performance reviews, as evidenced by the absence of documented annual performance evaluations in their personnel files. Both CNAs had been employed since 06/03/21, and a review of their files showed no evidence of these required reviews. This deficiency was confirmed during an interview with the Chief Operating Officer, who acknowledged the lack of annual performance reviews for the identified CNAs. The facility assessment indicated that areas of weakness identified in nurse aide performance reviews would be addressed through training and in-services, but the absence of these reviews meant this process was not followed for the affected CNAs.
Failure to Maintain Safe, Clean, and Homelike Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment for its residents, as evidenced by multiple issues with water temperature, bathroom and shower functionality, and general maintenance. Several residents reported that water in their rooms and shared shower areas was either too cold or fluctuated between too hot and too cold, with some unable to access working showers or toilets for extended periods. Observations confirmed that water temperatures in various sinks and showers were below comfortable levels, and maintenance logs or records of water temperature checks were not available for the past year. The maintenance supervisor was new to the position and had not previously checked or adjusted water temperatures, despite facility policy requiring regular monitoring. Additional environmental deficiencies were observed throughout the facility, including broken blinds in multiple resident rooms, discolored and sagging ceiling tiles, patched and unpainted dents in walls, chipped paint on door frames and resident doors, and damaged furniture such as missing drawers and cabinet doors. Some rooms had large holes in the walls, and one room had a piece of plywood leaning against the wall. These issues were confirmed by both the administrator and the housekeeping and maintenance supervisor during facility tours. Safety hazards were also present, with several handrails in hallways found to be loose and not securely attached to the walls. Staff interviews revealed that there was a period without a maintenance person on staff, and non-emergency maintenance issues were not being reported or addressed in a timely manner. The administrator was unable to provide any maintenance records for the previous 12 months, indicating a lack of ongoing facility upkeep and documentation.
Failure to Follow Menu Portion Sizes and Dietary Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow its established menu spreadsheets and portion control policies during meal service, resulting in residents not receiving the correct portion sizes as specified. On the observed lunch meal, the menu called for specific portion sizes for each food item, including four ounces of seasoned rice and a full or half portion of yellow cake depending on dietary restrictions. However, staff used smaller scoops than required for both the rice and ground pork, and all residents, including those on low-concentrated sweets (LCS) diets, received a full portion of cake instead of the prescribed half portion. These discrepancies were confirmed through observation, interviews with dietary staff, and review of production sheets and diet lists. Eight residents were on mechanical soft diets and eight on LCS diets, with one resident ordered nothing by mouth (NPO). Staff interviews confirmed that the serving utensils used did not match the portion sizes outlined in the menu spreadsheets, and the Dietary Manager acknowledged the deviations. Additionally, a resident reported dissatisfaction with the food, stating it was inadequate. Facility policies required strict adherence to specified portion sizes using designated utensils, but these were not followed during the observed meal service.
Failure to Serve Palatable Meals at Safe Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to serve palatable meals at appetizing and safe temperatures, as evidenced by multiple resident interviews and direct observation. Several residents reported that hot food was served cold, tasted terrible, and was of low quality, leading some to purchase their own food. On the day of observation, the lunch menu included smothered pork chop, seasoned rice, a vegetable blend, yellow cake, and a beverage. Food temperatures were initially measured at appropriate levels before service, but by the time trays reached the unit and were sampled, the hot foods had dropped significantly in temperature, with readings of 116°F for pork, 112°F for rice, and 115°F for vegetables. The milk was measured at 45°F. The sampled foods were described as lukewarm and not palatable at the time of service. The Dietary Manager confirmed during the sampling that the hot foods were not at the required minimum temperature of 145°F at the point of service, and acknowledged that the food was lukewarm and not palatable. The deficiency had the potential to affect all 53 residents receiving meals from the kitchen, as only one resident was on a nothing-by-mouth order. The findings were based on resident interviews, review of the menu, and direct observation of food preparation and service.
Widespread Infection Control Program Failures and Lapses in Surveillance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop, maintain, and implement an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by multiple deficiencies in infection surveillance, communication, and adherence to protocols. There were significant lapses in following local health department directives for a resident with a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO), including lack of documentation, failure to initiate enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), and delayed or incomplete screening and communication with public health authorities. The infection control logs were incomplete and inaccurate, lacking essential details such as dates of onset, culture results, symptoms, and isolation status, which prevented effective tracking and trending of infections. During a COVID-19 outbreak, the facility did not maintain proper infection tracking or surveillance for staff and residents. There was no evidence of outbreak testing or accurate reporting to the local health department, and several residents who tested positive for COVID-19 did not have timely or appropriate transmission-based precautions (TBP) orders. Staff interviews revealed confusion about testing procedures and a lack of a system for monitoring staff illness. Additionally, the facility was unable to provide documentation of a legionella water management program, and the available policies and plans did not meet requirements for risk assessment, control measures, or monitoring. The facility also failed to ensure proper implementation of EBP and TBP for residents with wounds, indwelling medical devices, or MDROs. Observations showed missing or unclear signage, lack of readily available personal protective equipment (PPE), and staff uncertainty regarding the reasons for precautions. Wound care was not performed according to policy, with instances of wounds not being cleansed during dressing changes. Furthermore, the facility did not ensure tuberculosis screening upon hire for several employees, as required by policy.
Inconsistent Documentation of Advance Directives Across Medical Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that advance directive orders were consistent and accurately documented across both electronic and paper medical records for five residents. For each of these residents, there were discrepancies between the advance directive status listed in the electronic medical record (EMR) and the paper medical record. In several cases, the EMR indicated a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCCA) order, while the paper record incorrectly listed the resident as full code, or lacked a signed DNR form altogether. These inconsistencies were confirmed through interviews with the Social Service Designee, who acknowledged the inaccuracies and incomplete documentation in the paper records. The affected residents had various diagnoses, including schizoaffective disorder, hypertension, dementia, diabetes, traumatic brain injury, and other chronic conditions. The facility's policy required that advance directives be reviewed upon admission, re-admission, quarterly, and annually, and that staff be knowledgeable about residents' resuscitative status. Despite these requirements, the facility did not maintain accurate or complete documentation of advance directives in the residents' records, leading to discrepancies between the EMR and paper files and missing signed DNR forms.
Incomplete and Inaccurate MDS Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for several residents were complete and accurate, as required. For four residents reviewed, key sections of the MDS, including cognitive patterns, mood, and pain assessments, were either left incomplete or marked as not assessed, despite indications that interviews should have been conducted. In multiple cases, the initial screening questions were answered affirmatively, indicating that interviews for mental status, mood, or pain should proceed, but subsequent required questions were left blank or marked with dashes. For example, one resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and heart failure had a quarterly MDS assessment where the cognitive patterns section was not completed, and the pain assessment section was also left incomplete. Another resident with dementia, Parkinson's disease, and anxiety had both cognitive and mood interview sections marked as not assessed, despite being eligible for interviews, and the pain assessment was similarly incomplete. Additional residents with complex medical histories, including diabetes, depression, and chronic pain, also had incomplete pain assessments on both admission and quarterly MDS assessments. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the MDS Coordinator completed assessments offsite and relied on other staff, such as the Social Services Director and nursing leadership, to provide information for specific sections. However, there was a lack of coordination and communication, resulting in incomplete assessments. Staff responsible for completing certain sections admitted to not always conducting interviews within the required time frames, and the MDS Coordinator confirmed that required sections were not completed for the affected residents.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive and Individualized Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans that addressed all identified needs for multiple residents. In several cases, care plans for activities of daily living (ADLs) lacked specific details regarding the type and amount of assistance required, leaving staff without clear guidance on how to support residents with bathing, bed mobility, dressing, personal hygiene, and toileting. For example, care plans for certain residents included placeholders such as '(specify what assistance)' instead of individualized instructions, which was confirmed by the Director of Nursing as insufficient for providing resident-centered care. Additionally, some residents with significant medical histories, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, multiple fractures, and cognitive impairments, did not have care plans that comprehensively addressed their physical, emotional, intellectual, and social needs. In one instance, a resident with impaired cognition and depression had care plans for specific areas but lacked an integrated, comprehensive plan to guide staff in meeting all of his needs, as verified by the Chief Operating Officer. The deficiency also extended to the omission of care plans for critical issues such as advance directives and infection management. Residents with documented Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCCA) orders did not have corresponding care plans addressing these directives. Furthermore, residents who experienced infections, including those with recent hospitalizations for cellulitis or positive cultures for multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), did not have care plans developed to address infection management or MDRO status. These omissions were confirmed through interviews with facility staff, including the Social Service Designee and the Director of Nursing.
Failure to Implement Fall Prevention and Safe Smoking Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized fall prevention program for two residents identified as being at risk for falls. One resident with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, osteoporosis, dementia, and generalized muscle weakness, who was dependent on a wheelchair, experienced a fall after attempting to pick something up from the floor. Although there were physician orders for fall prevention interventions such as a hand reacher tool, Dycem strips, and non-skid floor strips, there was no evidence these interventions were implemented or available at the time of the fall. Additionally, after the resident received two doses of anti-anxiety medication, there was no documented evaluation of her safety needs or fall risk, and no routine or appropriate fall follow-up, monitoring, or interdisciplinary review was found in the medical record. The facility's leadership was unable to provide details or documentation regarding the incident, interventions, or investigation, despite facility policy requiring such actions. Another resident with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, hypertension, diabetes, and dementia, who was at high risk for falls and had a history of falls, was repeatedly found on the floor beside his bed. Nursing staff did not assess the resident after these incidents, did not document them as falls, and did not implement new interventions to prevent future occurrences, believing the behavior was intentional. The DON confirmed that no fall investigations or interventions were put in place for this resident, despite facility policy requiring documentation, investigation, and development of a plan to prevent recurrence for all falls or incidents. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure proper disposal of cigarette butts in the designated smoking area. Observations revealed cigarette butts scattered in mulch, rocks, flower pots, wooden flower beds, sidewalks, and grass areas. Staff confirmed that residents frequently disposed of cigarette butts improperly, and although attempts were made to clean the area daily, the issue persisted. Facility policy required the establishment and maintenance of safe smoking practices, but these were not effectively implemented.
Failure to Timely Address Pharmacy Drug Regimen Review Recommendations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to act upon pharmacy drug regimen review recommendations in a timely manner for five residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. In each case, pharmacy recommendations regarding medication management, such as adding stop dates to PRN medications, reducing dosages, attempting gradual dose reductions, or providing clinical documentation for continued use, were not addressed or documented by the facility staff or physicians. The recommendations were often left blank, unsigned, and undated, with no evidence in the medical records or nurses' notes that they had been reviewed or acted upon. For example, one resident with multiple diagnoses including heart failure, schizophrenia, and diabetes continued to receive PRN Ativan and hydroxyzine without stop dates for several months despite repeated pharmacy recommendations to add stop dates. Another resident with schizoaffective disorder and dementia had pharmacy recommendations to reduce doses of Xarelto and Zyrtec, but these were not addressed. Additional residents were prescribed multiple antipsychotic medications or psychotropic drugs, and pharmacy recommendations to document clinical rationale, attempt dose reductions, or adjust therapy were not acted upon or documented by the facility or attending physicians. Interviews with the DON confirmed that pharmacy recommendations were not available in the residents' medical records and had to be obtained from the pharmacy during the survey. The DON also verified that the recommendations for all five residents had not been addressed in a timely manner, and there was no evidence of physician or prescriber follow-up. Review of the facility's policy indicated that drug regimen reviews should be conducted monthly by a licensed pharmacist, and any medication irregularities should be reviewed and documented by the attending physician, but this was not followed in practice.
Failure to Discontinue Outdated COVID-19 Precaution Orders in Medical Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that medical records for several residents were complete and accurate, specifically regarding the continuation of contact and droplet precaution orders for COVID-19 after the residents had recovered. For four residents with various diagnoses, including dementia, COPD, heart failure, Parkinson's disease, and schizophrenia, physician orders for COVID-19 precautions remained active in their records and on the Treatment Administration Records (TAR) for months after the residents were no longer symptomatic or required such precautions. Nursing staff continued to sign off on these outdated orders, and observations confirmed that the residents were not on the specified precautions during the review period. Interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON) and staff confirmed that the orders for contact and droplet precautions should have been discontinued after the residents' recovery from COVID-19, but this was not done in a timely manner. The DON acknowledged that the outdated orders were still present and being signed off by staff, despite the residents no longer needing those precautions. This failure resulted in incomplete and inaccurate medical records for the affected residents.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Showers and ADL Assistance for Dependent Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide scheduled showers and assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for dependent residents, as evidenced by record reviews and resident interviews. Four residents who required varying levels of assistance for bathing and showering did not receive showers as scheduled, and documentation of provided care was missing or incomplete. For example, one resident with chronic medical conditions and intact cognition was scheduled for showers twice weekly but did not receive 16 scheduled showers over nearly two months, with no documentation to support that care was offered or provided. Another resident with impaired cognition and mobility issues had only one documented shower over a six-week period, and reported not receiving any showers since admission, with the shower room observed to be out of order. Additional residents also experienced missed or undocumented showers. One resident requiring moderate assistance had multiple refusals documented, but there was no evidence that showers were consistently offered or provided as scheduled. Another resident, who was cognitively intact and required set-up assistance, had no shower data for the past 30 days and reported not having a shower for two weeks due to both showers on the unit being out of order. Staff interviews confirmed that refusals were to be documented, but records were incomplete or missing, and the DON was unable to provide additional documentation for any of the affected residents. The facility's policy required residents to bathe at least twice per week unless otherwise specified, with staff providing necessary support when residents could not perform ADLs independently. Despite this policy, the lack of documentation, missed scheduled showers, and reports of non-functioning shower facilities resulted in dependent residents not receiving the required assistance with bathing and hygiene.
Failure to Implement Antibiotic Stewardship and Incomplete Infection Control Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement appropriate antibiotic stewardship measures, as evidenced by the lack of proper documentation and adherence to established criteria for antibiotic use. For one resident with multiple complex diagnoses, including dementia, chronic kidney disease, and a history of UTIs, antibiotics were prescribed and administered for UTI symptoms without documented evidence of a urinalysis or culture to support the diagnosis. The Antibiotic Use Audit Tools indicated that this resident did not meet McGeer's Criteria for a UTI, yet antibiotics were still given. Interviews with facility leadership confirmed the absence of required laboratory documentation and reliance on family reports and physician orders, even when criteria for infection were not met. Additionally, the facility's infection control logs from June to December were incomplete, lacking essential information such as date of onset, culture results, symptoms, isolation status, and organism sensitivities. The logs only recorded basic information and did not allow for adequate tracking and trending of infections. Audit tools further revealed that none of the residents treated with antibiotics during this period met McGeer's Criteria for infection. Facility staff acknowledged gaps in infection control documentation and antibiotic stewardship program records, and confirmed that antibiotics were often continued based on physician preference, regardless of whether established criteria were met.
Failure to Obtain Proper Authorization for Resident Fund Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents authorized the management of their personal funds and that such authorization was witnessed by a third party, as required. For one resident with heart disease, anxiety, and dementia, the Human Resources Director opened a Resident Fund Management Service (RFMS) account and deposited funds transferred from another facility. Despite repeated attempts, the resident did not sign the authorization form, expressing a desire to read it and ultimately refusing to sign. The resident had a financial guardian, but the facility did not contact the guardian for authorization to manage the funds. In another case, a resident with dementia and depression also had an RFMS account established without the required signature from either the resident or their representative, and the form was not witnessed by a third party. Both residents had significant balances in their RFMS accounts at the time of review. The facility's policy on resident funds did not specify the process for obtaining signatures or third-party witnessing for RFMS account authorization.
Failure to Timely Disburse Resident Funds After Death
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to disburse personal funds to the estates of two deceased residents within the required 30-day timeframe. One resident, who had diagnoses including heart disease, anxiety, and dementia, passed away with a personal fund balance of $2,000.29, and the facility had not transferred these funds to his estate as of the review date. The Human Resource Director confirmed attempts to contact the resident's guardian but was unaware of the required timeframe for disbursement. Similarly, another resident with dementia and depression passed away with a personal fund balance of $5,239.68, and these funds also remained undistributed to the estate. The Human Resource Director stated that this resident had a financial power-of-attorney but was again unaware of the required timeframe for disbursement. Review of the facility's policy revealed it did not specify the process for disbursing funds after a resident's death.
Failure to Provide Private and Reasonable Phone Access
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident had reasonable access to and privacy during phone use. The resident, who had diagnoses including bipolar disorder, anxiety, and hypertension, was documented in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) as having adequate hearing, clear speech, and the ability to communicate, though with impaired cognition. It was specifically noted in the resident's preferences that private phone use was very important to him. Despite this, the only phone available for resident use was a corded phone at the nurse's station, which was handed through a hole in a plastic barrier, requiring the resident to use it in the hallway without privacy. On one occasion, the resident requested to use the phone multiple times but was denied access by an LPN who was busy with admissions. The LPN confirmed that she had refused the resident's request several times before he was eventually allowed to use the phone later. When the resident did use the phone, it was in the hallway, lacking privacy. The facility was unable to provide a policy regarding phone use or resident privacy during phone calls.
Failure to Complete Nursing Admission Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete a nursing assessment upon admission for one resident who was admitted with multiple medical conditions, including multiple rib fractures, encephalopathy, hallucinations, and alcohol withdrawal. Review of the resident's electronic and paper medical records showed that no nursing admission assessment was performed at the time of arrival. This was confirmed during an interview with the Chief Operating Officer, who acknowledged the absence of the required assessment. Additionally, the facility was unable to provide a policy regarding nursing assessments and their required timing.
Failure to Develop Baseline Care Plan Upon Admission
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for a resident within 48 hours of admission, as required by facility policy. The resident was admitted with multiple medical conditions, including multiple rib fractures, encephalopathy, hallucinations, and alcohol use with withdrawal. A review of the resident's electronic and paper medical records showed that no baseline care plan was completed after admission. This was confirmed during an interview with the Chief Operating Officer, who verified that the baseline care plan had not been completed since the resident's admission. The facility's policy states that the interdisciplinary team, along with the resident, their representative, and physician, should develop and implement a baseline care plan upon admission to provide effective and person-directed care. However, this process was not followed for the resident in question.
Failure to Update Care Plans for Changes in Advance Directives
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to timely update care plans to reflect changes in residents' advance directives, as evidenced by the records of three residents. For each of these residents, the electronic medical record indicated an advance directive of Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCCA), while both the care plan and paper medical record continued to list the resident as full code. Interviews with the Social Service Designee confirmed that the care plans were not revised to reflect the current advance directives, despite the facility's policy requiring care plans to be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment. The affected residents had complex medical histories, including diagnoses such as schizoaffective disorder, hypertension, insomnia, muscle weakness, diabetes, dementia with agitation, alcohol dependence, generalized anxiety disorder, paranoid personality disorder, delusional disorders, chronic kidney disease, and traumatic brain injury. The lack of timely updates to the care plans resulted in discrepancies between the residents' documented wishes regarding resuscitation and the information available to staff in the care plans and paper records.
Failure to Provide Catheter Anchoring Device
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement an anchoring device for a resident's indwelling urinary catheter, as required by the resident's care plan. The resident, who had diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's Disease, and dementia, had a care plan intervention specifying the use of a leg strap to anchor the catheter. However, there were no physician's orders for an anchoring device, and observation revealed the resident's catheter tubing was stretched tightly with the drainage bag placed under a mat, and no anchoring device was present. An LPN confirmed the absence of an anchoring device, and the DON verified that the facility did not have a urinary catheter policy.
Failure to Complete Dialysis Assessments and Ensure Care Coordination
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide safe and appropriate dialysis care for a resident dependent on hemodialysis by not completing required pre- and post-dialysis assessments and not ensuring effective communication and collaboration with the outside dialysis center. Record review showed that the resident, who had multiple diagnoses including traumatic brain injury, vascular dementia, and chronic kidney disease, was scheduled for dialysis three times a week. However, there was no evidence in the medical record of completed pre- and post-dialysis assessment tools or communication of assessment findings with the dialysis center. Interviews with multiple LPNs and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the resident did not return from dialysis with any forms or assessments, and the facility did not maintain a dialysis binder or communication sheets. The facility's policy referenced the need for individualized care planning and assessment but did not specify procedures for communicating assessment information with the dialysis center. Additionally, the facility did not have a valid, dated contract with the outside dialysis center to ensure coordination of care. The transfer agreement between the facility and the dialysis provider was undated, and the administrator confirmed that a previous contract was unavailable for review. This lack of a valid contract further contributed to the failure to coordinate all care and services related to dialysis treatment for the resident.
Failure to Prevent Resident-to-Resident Physical Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prevent resident-to-resident physical abuse, resulting in one resident being physically assaulted by another. The incident involved a cognitively intact female resident with a history of behavioral issues, including delusions and aggression, and a cognitively intact male resident with a history of schizoaffective disorder, depression, and prior aggressive behaviors. The male resident initiated a physical altercation by following the female resident in his motorized wheelchair and striking her multiple times in the back of the head with his shoe, causing her to fall out of her wheelchair and sustain a small skin tear and complaints of pain. Multiple witness statements confirmed that the male resident was the aggressor, and the female resident did not provoke the incident. The altercation occurred in a hallway after a smoke break, and staff were not present at the time to intervene. The facility's investigation substantiated the occurrence of resident-to-resident physical abuse, and the affected resident required assessment and pain management following the incident. Review of the facility's abuse prevention policy revealed that while the policy addressed assessment, care planning, and monitoring of residents with aggressive behaviors, it did not include specific response protocols for instances of resident-to-resident abuse. The lack of clear protocols and staff presence contributed to the failure to prevent the physical abuse between residents.
Failure to Timely Report and Investigate Allegations of Misappropriation and Injury of Unknown Origin
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to timely report allegations of misappropriation and injury of unknown origin, affecting two residents. In the first case, a cognitively intact resident with a history of anxiety and PTSD reported her tablet missing, alleging that a CNA took it and sold it to another resident. The initial report of the missing tablet was made to the Social Service Designee (SSD) on 01/04/25, but the facility did not file a Self-Reported Incident (SRI) until 01/06/25, which was not in accordance with facility policy. The investigation into the alleged misappropriation was minimal, with only two staff statements collected and no direct interview or written statement from the resident. The facility ultimately determined the allegation to be unsubstantiated, but documentation and interviews confirmed that the reporting and investigation were incomplete and not timely. In the second case, a resident with severe cognitive impairment, Parkinson's disease, osteoporosis, and total dependence on staff experienced a fall and was later found to have a pelvic fracture. The resident was found on the floor by staff, and although an x-ray was performed, the fracture was not initially detected. The resident continued to experience pain and was later hospitalized, where the fracture was identified. The resident's sister reported concerns about the resident's pain and care, providing videos showing the resident in distress during care activities. Despite these concerns and the subsequent discovery of a serious injury, the facility did not file an SRI to rule out potential abuse or injury of unknown origin as required by policy. There was no evidence of a thorough investigation, interdisciplinary review, or root cause analysis related to the fall and injury. Interviews with facility staff, including the Chief Operating Officer and Administrator, confirmed that the required reporting and investigation procedures were not followed in both cases. The facility's own policy mandated immediate or timely reporting of suspected abuse, misappropriation, and injuries of unknown origin, as well as comprehensive follow-up and documentation. The lack of timely reporting and incomplete investigations for both the missing property and the injury of unknown origin constituted non-compliance with regulatory requirements.
Failure to Thoroughly Investigate Allegations of Misappropriation and Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of misappropriation and injury of unknown origin involving two residents. In the first case, a cognitively intact resident with a history of anxiety and PTSD reported her tablet missing, alleging that a CNA took it and sold it to another resident. The facility's investigation was limited to two staff statements and did not include an interview or written statement from the resident, the alleged perpetrator, or other involved staff. The facility's documentation was insufficient, and there was no evidence that all relevant parties were interviewed or that the resident's account was fully considered, despite the resident later locating her tablet in another resident's room. In the second case, a resident with severe cognitive impairment, Parkinson's disease, and osteoporosis experienced a fall and subsequently complained of pain for several days. The resident was later hospitalized and diagnosed with a pelvic fracture. The resident's sister reported concerns about the care provided, including rough handling by a CNA and inadequate pain management, and submitted video evidence to the facility. However, the facility's self-reported incident investigation did not include interviews with the sister, review of the provided videos, or consideration of the resident's fall and subsequent pain. The investigation was limited in scope and did not address all aspects of the reported concerns. Facility policy required comprehensive investigations of abuse allegations, including interviews with all involved parties, review of medical records, and documentation of all evidence. In both cases, the facility did not follow its own policy, as investigations lacked necessary interviews, review of available evidence, and complete documentation. These deficiencies resulted in incomplete investigations of serious allegations affecting resident safety and property.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Showers for Independent Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that independent residents received scheduled showers, as evidenced by record review, observation, and interviews. Three residents who were independent with activities of daily living (ADLs) did not receive showers as scheduled. For one resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and heart failure, there was no documentation of showers for over two months, and the care plan did not specify the level of assistance required. The resident reported not receiving showers due to a broken shower room, which was confirmed by observation of a sign indicating the shower was out of order. The Director of Nursing (DON) was unable to locate any shower documentation for this resident. Another resident with paranoid schizophrenia, depression, and anxiety, who required only set-up help for bathing, had only one documented shower refusal and no other records of showers since admission. This resident also reported not receiving scheduled showers. A third resident, independent with bathing and mobility and diagnosed with dementia and other psychiatric conditions, was not listed on the facility's shower schedule, had no shower data for the past 30 days, and reported not having a shower or bed bath for three weeks. The DON confirmed the absence of shower documentation and that this resident should have been on the schedule. Facility staff interviews indicated that refusals were to be documented, but records did not reflect this. The facility's policy required residents to bathe at least twice per week unless otherwise specified.
Failure to Provide Necessary Behavioral Health Care and Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care and services to a resident with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia. The resident was care planned for behavioral issues such as agitation, yelling out, and rolling off the bed onto a mat on the floor. Interventions in the care plan included inviting the resident to activities, encouraging participation, and providing diversional activities tailored to his interests. However, observations revealed that staff did not implement these interventions. The resident was repeatedly found on the floor mat or in bed, yelling for help, without being offered any diversional activities or engagement. Staff responses were limited to addressing immediate physical needs, such as returning the resident to bed, without addressing underlying behavioral health needs or providing activities as care planned. Further interviews with staff indicated a lack of understanding or implementation of behavioral interventions, with some staff leaving the resident in bed due to safety concerns and not providing alternative activities. The DON confirmed that diversional activities should have been provided, and the Administrator was unable to provide evidence of recent staff education on behavioral health care beyond a single in-service focused on drug and alcohol withdrawal. Additionally, the facility could not produce a behavioral healthcare policy and procedure, indicating a systemic failure to ensure necessary behavioral health care and services for the resident.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,284 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 12 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Richfield
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regina Health Center | 2.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Heights Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center, The | 4.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Avenue At Broadview Heights | 4.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 14 | 0 |
| Oaks Of Brecksville | 4.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Brentwood Health Care Center | 5.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Momentous Health At Richfield.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.