Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around April 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Brooksville Healthcare Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Staff failed to use required PPE for residents on enhanced barrier and contact precautions and failed to perform hand hygiene during medication administration. A CNA, LPNs, a housekeeper, a maintenance worker, and another CNA entered isolation rooms or provided direct care without the required gown and/or gloves, and one LPN handled medications with bare hands after pills fell on the cart before administering them.
Failure to notify the physician and family of changes in condition occurred for one resident with repeated hypoglycemia and three residents with skin tears or wounds. An LPN did not notify the provider about low blood sugar readings requiring treatment, and staff could not find documentation of skin tear or wound assessments, provider notification, or resident representative notification for the other residents. Facility policy required notification when a resident had a skin tear or a change requiring new treatment.
The facility failed to coordinate PASRR for two residents who developed newly evident or possible serious mental disorders after admission. One resident had bipolar disorder on PASRR, but later psych notes documented mood disorder, psychosis, brief psychotic disorder, and other specified persistent mood disorders. Another resident had depressive disorder on PASRR, but later psych notes documented depression, insomnia, mood disorder, and major depressive disorder, recurrent. The SS Director said she was not aware the PASRR needed review, and the DON said she did not know how new diagnoses would be updated.
Failure to develop care plan focuses for antibiotic use and nutrition. A resident receiving Macrobid for UTI treatment and prophylaxis had no antibiotic focus in the care plan despite multiple chronic conditions, and the DON stated it should have been done. Two residents with significant wt loss and diet modifications also had no nutritional focus in their care plans, even though dietary notes documented weight loss reviews, supplements, fortified foods, and recommendations for weekly weights.
Failure to Maintain ROM Services: A resident with CVA-related impairments was observed in bed with contractures in both hands and reported not receiving therapy or having splints. The record showed an OT discharge plan that included a ROM program for restorative nursing, but no OT evaluation had occurred since the prior year, despite PT notes documenting decreased hand and elbow function and staff acknowledging the resident should have had another OT evaluation.
Failure to Monitor Weights for Residents at Nutritional Risk: Two residents with significant wt loss and nutritional risk factors did not have the ordered weekly weights documented. One resident had wt loss while on a mechanical soft diet with mildly thick liquids, and the RD recommended weekly weights after discussing the case with the IDT. The other resident had wt loss with COPD, dysphagia, CHF, and dementia, was receiving Medpass, Ensure, double portions, and fortified foods, and also had weekly weight recommendations and a physician order, but staff could not locate the expected weights.
An LPN reported needing to leave mid-shift, but coverage was not arranged and she remained responsible for a heavy assignment while behind on med pass. She was observed with 10 residents in red for late meds while also doing accu-checks and insulin coverage, and multiple residents with complex diagnoses had delayed or missed scheduled meds that required provider notification and order changes. Interviews showed the DON, ADON, and staffing coordinator each had limited awareness of the extent of the delay until it was observed at the nursing station.
Inaccurate documentation was found for a resident with an indwelling catheter, where staff said catheter care was done every shift and PRN but the order had fallen off and there was no place in the record to document it. The facility also lacked documentation for multiple residents with bandaged skin areas, including skin tears and a leg dressing, with staff unable to locate orders or notes supporting the wounds. In addition, a resident’s hand splint treatment was signed off on the TAR daily even though staff said the splints had not been used and the DON confirmed the order should not have been active.
The facility failed to notify resident representatives of incidents involving two residents. One resident, on an NPO diet, was mistakenly given oral medications, and the family was not informed. Another resident experienced a fall, and despite an assessment and x-ray order, the family was not notified. The facility's policy requires family notification for significant changes, which was not followed in these cases.
A resident with multiple diagnoses, including dementia and heart failure, was admitted under hospice care, as per a physician's order. However, the resident's annual MDS did not indicate hospice care, which was acknowledged as a coding error by the MDS Coordinator. The facility's policy requires accurate documentation of residents' medical and psychosocial status, which was not followed in this instance.
A facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident with chronic atrial fibrillation who was receiving Pradaxa, an anticoagulant medication. The care plan lacked focus areas or interventions for atrial fibrillation or anticoagulant medication, despite the resident's diagnoses and medication orders. This deficiency was confirmed by the MDS Coordinator, highlighting a failure to adhere to the facility's policy for comprehensive care planning.
A resident with heart failure and chronic kidney disease received medications outside prescribed parameters due to staff not checking vital signs immediately before administration. The LPN relied on earlier readings, leading to a medication error as per facility policy.
A facility failed to label a medical nutrition supplement for a resident receiving tube feeding, as observed during a survey. The feeding bag lacked essential information such as patient name, ID, date/time started, and tube feeding order. Staff interviews revealed a lack of adherence to labeling protocols, with a nurse acknowledging the oversight and the Assistant Director of Nursing emphasizing the importance of proper labeling. The facility's policy required compliance with regulations for safe administration, which was not followed.
The facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene and PPE use during meal service, medication administration, and high-contact care. A CNA did not sanitize hands between delivering meal trays, an LPN failed to perform hand hygiene during medication administration, and another LPN did not sanitize hands while checking a resident's blood glucose. Additionally, a CNA provided care to a resident on enhanced barrier precautions without wearing a gown.
PPE and Hand Hygiene Failures During Isolation Care and Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate PPE for residents on enhanced barrier precautions and contact precautions, and failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed when required during medication administration. During observation of a resident on enhanced barrier precautions for wounds, a CNA provided incontinence care and changed the resident’s brief and clothing without wearing a gown, even though enhanced barrier precautions signage was posted on the doorway and no PPE was available on or near the door. The CNA stated she should have put on a gown to change the resident. Later, an LPN entered the same resident’s room and assisted with repositioning without gloves or a gown, then returned and donned gloves without performing hand hygiene before assisting again and helping paramedics move the resident from the bed to a stretcher. The record showed another resident had diagnoses including chronic osteomyelitis of the left ankle and foot, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and MRSA in a toe wound. In that resident’s room, contact isolation signage and PPE were posted, but a maintenance staff member entered without gown and gloves. In another room with enhanced barrier precautions signage, an LPN assisted a resident into the bathroom wearing gloves only and stated she should have put on a gown. A CNA also entered a resident’s room with contact precautions signage and a rack of gowns and gloves on the door without donning PPE, and confirmed she should have worn a gown and gloves because the resident was on contact isolation. The report also documented a housekeeper cleaning a room with both enhanced barrier and contact isolation signage while wearing gloves only and stating she did not understand the signs on the door. The assistant DON stated the enhanced barrier precautions signage had been removed from the door, leaving contact isolation signage in place. In addition, during medication preparation for another resident, an LPN touched medications with bare hands after pills fell onto the medication cart, poured medications from blister packs into an ungloved hand, and then administered them without performing hand hygiene. The DON stated staff should not touch medication with their hands and should dispose of medication that falls outside the medication cup.
Failure to Notify Physician and Family of Changes in Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for Resident #122 after documented hypoglycemia that required treatment. Resident #122 had diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, and the physician order for sliding-scale insulin included notification of the provider for blood sugar greater than 350. The MAR documented blood glucose readings of 47 on 5/2/2026 and 5/15/2026, and also 51 on 4/3/2026 and 58 on 4/16/2026. Nursing progress notes showed no notification to the physician or nurse practitioner for any of these low blood sugar readings, and an LPN stated that the doctor or nurse practitioner was not notified even though they should have been. The facility also failed to notify the physician and resident representative regarding skin tears or wounds for Resident #35, Resident #80, and Resident #87. Resident #35 had a bandage on the left forearm dated 5/8/2026, and the RN stated there was no documentation relating to the skin tear on the left wrist/forearm. The ADON stated that when a resident gets a skin tear, the nurse should assess the skin, document the injury, contact the physician, receive orders as needed, and contact the family. The facility policy for skin tears required documentation of the injury and notification of the physician and resident representative. Resident #80 was observed with a tan bandage on the left forearm with no date, and staff could not identify an order for the bandage; the wound care nurse stated the resident likely had a skin tear to the forearm. Resident #87 was observed with a dressing on the left lower leg dated 5/16, and the resident stated she had not bumped her leg and did not know what had happened. Progress notes from 5/1/2026 through 5/18/2026 showed no documentation of the wound or notification to the provider or resident representative, and the DON stated that when a resident has a wound, the nurse should notify the provider and family and document the notification and treatment orders.
Failure to Coordinate PASRR for Residents With New Psychiatric Diagnoses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to coordinate PASRR for two residents who developed newly evident or possible serious mental disorders after admission. Resident #6 was admitted and later readmitted with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, brief psychotic disorder, other specified persistent mood disorders, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, and bipolar disorder. The resident’s PASRR listed bipolar disorder as the only mental illness or suspected mental illness, but a psychiatry evaluation later documented a chief complaint of mood disorder and psychosis and assessed brief psychotic disorder and other specified persistent mood disorders. Resident #152 was admitted and later readmitted with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and other specified persistent mood disorders. The resident’s PASRR listed depressive disorder as the only mental illness or suspected mental illness, but a psychiatric subsequent note later documented depression, insomnia, and mood disorder, with diagnoses of major depressive disorder, recurrent, and mood disorder. During interview, the Social Services Director stated she was not aware the PASRR needed to be reviewed and believed the diagnoses fell under bipolar disorder for Resident #6, while the DON stated she could not explain how new diagnoses would be updated in PASRR and said she had not been instructed to do so. The facility policy stated that any resident who exhibits a newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or related condition will be referred promptly for a Level II resident review.
Failure to develop care plan focuses for antibiotic use and nutrition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident receiving Macrobid for UTI treatment and prophylaxis. The resident had multiple diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, unspecified dementia, COPD, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, heart failure, chronic kidney disease with heart failure and stage 5 CKD/end stage renal disease, pulmonary hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, GERD, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and atherosclerotic heart disease. The physician order showed Macrobid 100 mg every 12 hours for 7 days for UTI and then 1 capsule daily for prophylactic UTI indefinitely, but the care plan had no focus for antibiotic use. The DON stated the resident did not have any care plan developed for antibiotic use and that it should have been done. The facility also failed to develop nutritional care plan focuses for two residents with significant weight loss and diet modifications. One resident was ordered a regular easy-to-chew minced and moist meat texture diet with regular consistency and fortified foods, and had lost 8.44% of body weight from 175.4 lbs to 160.6 lbs. A dietary note documented weight loss review, Medpass started, no new weight since the last intervention, and a recommendation for weekly weights, but the care plan did not show a nutritional focus. The second resident was ordered pureed texture, moderately thick liquids, assist with all meats, aspiration precautions, fortified foods with all meals, and double portions, and had lost 14.53% of body weight from 198.2 lbs to 169.4 lbs. A dietary note identified risk for unintentional weight loss related to COPD, dysphagia, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, CHF, and dementia, and documented Medpass TID, Ensure TID, double portions, fortified foods, and a recommendation for weekly weights x 4 weeks, but the care plan also did not show a nutritional focus. The MDS Coordinator stated the nutrition focus needed to be added for both residents.
Failure to Maintain Range of Motion Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident received services to prevent a decline in range of motion. Resident #64 was observed lying in bed with contractures on both hands, and the resident stated that therapy was not being received and that there were no splints. The resident had a physician order for PT/OT/ST eval and treat as indicated, and an OT discharge summary from the prior therapy episode stated that a ROM program had been established and that restorative nursing had been trained to carry out ROM techniques appropriate with prior skilled therapy services. The record showed no OT evaluation since March 2025, despite later PT documentation noting the resident had physical impairments and was at risk for contracture without skilled therapeutic intervention. A PT note also documented decreased function in the left elbow and limited hand function affecting wheelchair propulsion. The resident’s care plan addressed CVA-related complications and stated that if the resident was presenting with problems or paralysis, PT and OT should be obtained to evaluate and treat. Staff interviews confirmed the resident had not been evaluated by OT since last year, and the rehab director stated residents should be assessed at least every 6 months.
Failure to Monitor Weights for Residents at Nutritional Risk
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to monitor weights for two residents who were identified as being at nutritional risk. Resident #55 had documented weight loss from 175.4 lbs on 12/5/2025 to 160.6 lbs on 4/27/2026, a loss of 8.44%. A dietary progress note dated 1/15/2026 documented that the LDN reviewed the resident’s chart and discussed weight loss with the IDT, noted the resident was on a mechanical soft meat texture and mildly thick liquids, and recommended weekly weights. The nutritional recommendation form also called for weekly weights for 4 weeks, but the weight record showed only a weight of 171 lbs on 1/10/2026 and 175.4 lbs on 2/2/2026, with no weekly weights documented after January 2026. Resident #67 had documented weight loss from 198.2 lbs on 10/28/2025 to 169.4 lbs on 4/27/2026, a loss of 14.53%. A dietary progress note dated 1/15/2026 recommended weekly weights, and a later note dated 4/2/2026 stated the resident was at risk for unintentional weight loss due to COPD, dysphagia, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, CHF, and dementia, and that the resident had been receiving Medpass TID, Ensure TID, double portions, and fortified foods; it again recommended weekly weights for 4 weeks. A physician order dated 4/23/2026 also directed weekly weights, but the DON, RD, and CDM each stated they could not locate additional weights for either resident, and the CDM reported no other April 2026 weights for Resident #67 beyond 4/26/2026.
Insufficient nursing staffing led to delayed medication administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement an effective staffing system to ensure sufficient nursing staff to meet resident needs. On 5/19/2026, an LPN reported that she told the staffing coordinator she needed to leave because of a family situation, but she was told to contact her agency for a replacement. She stated that while waiting, she continued working and later reported she was behind on medication administration, with 29 patients assigned and 10 residents not yet medicated. She also stated she had not received help or been asked if she was okay, and described the unit as busy with g-tube residents, blood sugar checks, and insulin coverage. At 11:18 AM, the LPN was observed with 10 residents marked red in the medication system and was performing accu-checks and insulin coverage. At 12:20 PM, she was observed at the nursing station calling a provider about one resident who had refused medications scheduled for 9 AM and making a list of the residents whose medications were delayed and the providers to notify. The ADON then came to the station, was shown the computer screen with the delayed medications, and stated surprise that the nurse was behind on all those residents. The ADON asked for the list of residents and said she would take care of the situation. Interviews showed the DON said she was told only that the LPN had a family issue and needed to leave, and that she instructed the staffing coordinator to tell the nurse to contact her agency for replacement. The staffing coordinator stated she told the DON about the need for coverage and later informed the ADON after seeing the MAR red, but she was unsure whether the DON was told the nurse was behind on medications. The ADON stated she was not aware the staff member was running late until she saw the nurse at the nursing station, and the DON stated no one told her the nurse was behind on medication administration. Record review showed multiple residents had delayed or missed scheduled medications on the same day, with numerous medication administration notes documenting that providers were notified and gave orders to reschedule doses, hold doses, or allow missed doses. Residents involved had diagnoses including dysphagia, seizures, dementia, diabetes, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and other chronic conditions. The facility policy stated it is the policy to provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skills to assure resident safety and meet resident needs, and the facility assessment noted awareness of limitations in administering medications and administering medications residents need.
Inaccurate Documentation of Catheter Care, Skin Conditions, and Splint Treatments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately document urinary catheter care for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter. During observation, the resident had a catheter bag hanging from the bed with clear tubing and no kinks. The physician orders included catheter change instructions and an order for an indwelling catheter, but the record did not show an order for catheter care. The DON stated there should be orders in the system for residents with catheters, and staff stated catheter care was done every shift and as needed even though the order had fallen off after the resident returned from the hospital. The ADON stated the treatment record would be the only way to document the care provided and that orders should be in place so staff had a place to accurately document the care. The facility also failed to ensure change in condition was documented for three residents with skin conditions. One resident had a bandage on the left forearm dated 5/8/2026, but nursing notes and physician orders did not show documentation of a skin tear or bandage application to that area. An RN stated she could not find any documentation related to the resident's skin tear, and the ADON stated that when a resident gets a skin tear, the nurse should assess the skin care and document the injury. Another resident had a tan bandage on the left forearm on two observations, but there was no physician order or progress note documenting the bandage, and staff stated they did not know anything about it or could not find documentation. A wound care nurse stated she thought the resident had a skin tear to the forearm but also stated she did not see any documentation. A third resident had a dressing on the left lower leg dated 5/16, but the resident stated she had not bumped her leg and did not know what had happened. There were no physician orders for wound care and no MAR/TAR documentation of wound care. An LPN stated there was no order or documentation on the MAR or TAR and confirmed there was nothing documented about an injury or report of the event. The DON stated that if a resident has a bandage on the leg, there should be a treatment order and something on the TAR. The facility further failed to ensure treatment documentation was accurate for a resident with resting hand splint orders. The physician orders directed staff to apply left and right resting hand splints at night and check skin integrity before and after placement and removal. The TAR showed daily documentation of application and removal, but multiple nurses stated they had not seen the resident wearing the splints recently or had not used them. One nurse stated she needed to discontinue the order because the resident had not worn the splints in a long time, and the DON confirmed the resident should not have splint orders while also confirming the TAR was being signed off daily as if the treatment were being done.
Failure to Notify Resident Representatives of Incidents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the resident representative of an accident requiring physician intervention for two residents. Resident #86, who was admitted with conditions such as dysphagia and moderate protein calorie malnutrition, was mistakenly given oral medications despite being on an NPO diet. The error occurred when an orientee nurse mixed up the beds and administered medications meant for another resident. Although the physician was notified and no immediate adverse reactions were observed, the resident's family was not informed of the incident, contrary to the facility's policy. Resident #17, with a complex medical history including Parkinsonism and type 2 diabetes mellitus, experienced a fall. The nursing progress note indicated that the resident was found on the floor and assisted back to bed, with a subsequent assessment revealing bruising and pain in the thumb. An x-ray was ordered, and the resident was monitored, but there was no documentation that the family was notified of the fall. Interviews with staff confirmed that the family notification did not occur, which is a requirement for any change in condition. The facility's policy mandates that any significant change in a resident's condition, such as medication errors or falls, should be communicated to the resident's representative. However, in both cases, the staff failed to notify the families, which was acknowledged by the Director of Nursing and the Risk Manager. The lack of documentation and communication with the families represents a deficiency in adhering to the facility's notification policy.
Inaccurate Resident Assessment for Hospice Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment for a resident, identified as Resident #65, who was admitted with multiple diagnoses including senile degeneration of the brain, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, heart failure, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. A physician's order dated 12/9/2023 indicated that the resident was to be admitted under hospice care. However, the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) did not reflect this hospice care status under Section O - Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs. During an interview, the MDS Coordinator acknowledged that the resident was indeed on hospice care and that the MDS had been incorrectly coded. The facility's policy on conducting accurate resident assessments emphasizes the importance of documenting the resident's medical, functional, and psychosocial status accurately, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plan for Anticoagulant Therapy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident who was reviewed for medication administration. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including chronic atrial fibrillation, essential hypertension, and cognitive communication deficit. Despite having a physician's order for Pradaxa, an anticoagulant medication, to be administered twice daily for atrial fibrillation, the resident's care plan did not include a focus area or interventions for atrial fibrillation or anticoagulant medication. This oversight was confirmed during an interview with the MDS Coordinator, who acknowledged that the resident should have been care planned for these conditions. The facility's policy requires a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's needs, which was not adhered to in this case.
Medication Administration Error Due to Non-Compliance with Physician Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident received medications as ordered by the physician, specifically concerning the administration of Bisoprolol Fumarate and Verapamil HCl ER. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and syncope, had specific physician orders to hold Bisoprolol if the heart rate was less than 60 and Verapamil if the blood pressure was less than 105/60 or heart rate less than 55. However, the Medication Administration Record showed that the resident received Bisoprolol on multiple occasions when the heart rate was below the prescribed parameter. Additionally, during a medication pass observation, an LPN administered both medications without checking the vital signs immediately before administration, relying instead on readings taken two hours earlier. Interviews with the APRN and the Director of Nursing revealed that staff were expected to follow physician orders and check vital signs immediately before administering medications, especially when parameters were close to the limits. The facility's policy on medication administration emphasized the importance of obtaining and recording vital signs per physician orders and holding medications if vital signs were outside prescribed parameters. The failure to adhere to these protocols resulted in the administration of medications outside the prescribed parameters, constituting a medication error as defined by the facility's policy.
Failure to Label Tube Feeding Nutrition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to appropriately label a medical nutrition supplement for a resident receiving tube feeding, which was observed during a survey. The resident was resting in bed with a feeding pump on a pole beside her. The pump was turned off, and a 1000 ml bag of Peptamen 1.5 kcal/ml nutritionally complete formula was hanging on the pole. The bag lacked essential labeling information such as the patient name, patient ID, date/time started, and tube feeding order. This lack of labeling was confirmed during a follow-up observation when the resident was receiving the nutritional formula at 45 ml/hr through the feeding tube pump. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of adherence to labeling protocols. A Licensed Practical Nurse acknowledged the oversight, stating that the bag of nutrition was not labeled and dated before starting the feeding pump. The Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed the requirement for labeling with date, time, and initials of the person who hung it, emphasizing its importance for safety. The Director of Nutritional Services indicated that while there was no specific policy for labeling nutritional feeding products, it was understood to fall under the medication administration labeling policy. The facility's policy on labeling medications and biologicals required compliance with state and federal regulations to ensure safe administration, which was not followed in this instance.
Infection Control Deficiencies in Hand Hygiene and PPE Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during meal service, medication administration, and high-contact care activities. During an afternoon meal service, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) did not perform hand hygiene between delivering meal trays to multiple residents. The CNA handled used items and assisted residents with meal setups without sanitizing hands, which was acknowledged by the CNA during an interview, stating a lack of awareness about the need for hand hygiene between tray deliveries. In another instance, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) failed to perform hand hygiene during medication administration. The LPN prepared medications and entered a resident's room without sanitizing hands, donned a gown improperly, and wore a thumb and wrist brace without proper hand hygiene. The LPN admitted to not performing hand hygiene before preparing medications and acknowledged the risk of contamination due to the untied gown during the medication administration process. Additionally, another LPN did not perform hand hygiene while checking a resident's blood glucose levels. The LPN entered the resident's room, performed the procedure, and returned to the medication cart without sanitizing hands or removing gloves. The LPN acknowledged the oversight in hand hygiene practices. Furthermore, a CNA provided personal hygiene care to a resident on enhanced barrier precautions without wearing a gown, despite the presence of signage indicating the need for such precautions. The CNA admitted to forgetting to don a gown during the care process.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 37 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 6 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Brooksville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northbrook Center For Rehabilitation And Healing | 0.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Aviata At Brooksville | 2.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Oak Hill Health & Rehabilitation | 7.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Evergreen Woods | 7.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Aviata At Spring Hill | 7.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Brooksville Healthcare Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.