Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Marlborough Health & Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A cognitively impaired resident with dementia, schizoaffective disorder, and anxiety, who required supervision and used a wheelchair, was subjected to physical abuse by a nurse aide during transport in the resident’s room. Video footage showed the aide striking the top of the resident’s cap and then the side of the resident’s head, followed by a loud noise and the resident yelling in distress, while the resident’s arms remained on the wheelchair armrests. The resident’s care plan noted potential for aggressive behaviors and outlined interventions to manage anxiety and agitation, but the aide’s actions violated the facility’s abuse policy prohibiting willful infliction of injury, intimidation, or punishment resulting in physical harm, pain, or mental anguish, and resulted in actual psychosocial harm under the reasonable person standard.
A resident with hypertension, prior intracerebral hemorrhage, and multiple antihypertensive medications had several elevated BP readings over multiple days, with electronic alerts triggered, but the physician was not notified of abnormal values on at least two days. The resident’s care plan called for monitoring vital signs and abnormal cardiac symptoms, yet staff interviews showed inconsistent and informal personal thresholds for reporting high BP, lack of awareness of any facility-wide parameters, and failure to document a rechecked BP. The DON reported that, in the absence of specific physician orders, staff were to follow a care path that only required reporting systolic BP over 200, and the facility lacked a policy for reporting abnormal vital signs when there was no acute mental status change, despite a general change-in-condition policy requiring notification of significant physical changes.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple psychiatric diagnoses had a camera installed in their shared room after an LPN obtained only verbal consent from the responsible party, despite explaining that written consent was required. The facility installed the camera on the roommate’s side of the room before the resident’s roommate virtual monitoring consent form was signed and before the seven-day waiting period mandated by the consent documents and state-modeled guidelines. Video footage captured the resident being transported into the room, being struck twice by staff, their verbal outburst, and visual and audio activity in the room, hallway, and shared bathroom, contrary to the resident’s documented rights to privacy in personal and medical care and electronic communications.
A dependent, severely cognitively impaired resident with a trach, G-tube, hemiplegia, seizures, and hypertension experienced an acute change in condition with lethargy, clammy skin, vomiting, and elevated BP. An LPN turned off tube feeding and called an RN, who assessed the resident, elevated the HOB, suctioned, and then left to call 911 and the family and complete paperwork, while the LPN resumed passing meds to other residents. Staff interviews revealed that no staff member remained with the resident continuously from the time 911 was called until family and EMS arrived, despite the resident’s compromised status and need for suctioning during transfer. The DON acknowledged that staff are expected to supervise residents after 911 activation and expressed concern that no one stayed with this resident. Requested emergency response and supervision policies were not provided.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment, functional mobility deficits, and non-ambulatory status was transported in a wheelchair without leg rests by a NA, despite the NA having documented competency that included ensuring feet were placed on footrests. Video showed the resident intermittently placing feet on the floor and appearing agitated during transport. A PT reported the resident could not maintain legs raised and frequently rested feet on the floor, and stated that doing so during assisted wheelchair transport posed a risk of injury and potential ejection. The NA acknowledged that facility practice was to attach leg rests before transport, and the DON confirmed leg rests should have been used or an alternate transport method sought if they were refused. The facility was unable to provide a policy for assisted wheelchair transport when requested.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and mobility issues experienced a decline in ability to bear weight and increased pain following a fall. Despite repeated reports from therapy staff to nursing, no comprehensive assessment or provider notification occurred over an extended period. The DON was not made aware of the resident's change in condition until an acute hip fracture was identified, contrary to facility policy requiring timely assessment and physician notification.
Two residents with dementia and severe memory deficits were involved in an incident where one, known for wandering, entered another's room and both were found partially undressed attempting sexual contact. Staff had observed the wandering behavior earlier but did not implement increased monitoring or care-planned interventions until after the incident occurred.
A resident with severe cognitive and psychiatric impairments was slapped on the cheek by another resident known for physical aggression, after the aggressor attempted to enter the first resident's room. The incident was witnessed by staff but not prevented, and the affected resident was left upset and crying, though no physical injuries were observed.
A resident with dementia and mobility impairments was not properly positioned in a wheelchair by staff, leading to a fall that caused serious injuries, including fractures. Despite the resident's requests to stop, the aide continued pushing the wheelchair, resulting in the resident sliding out and hitting a dresser. Witnesses reported the aide did not seek immediate help, and the facility's investigation was incomplete, with delays in calling EMS and insufficient documentation of the incident.
A resident with dementia and mobility impairments suffered a fall with major injury after being improperly assisted by a nursing assistant, who failed to position the resident correctly in a wheelchair and did not respond to the resident's request to stop. After the fall, staff moved the resident multiple times before an RN assessment was completed, contrary to facility policy requiring immobility until evaluation for possible fractures. The incident was witnessed by another resident, and staff accounts were inconsistent regarding the handling of the situation.
A cognitively impaired resident with severe dementia and wandering behaviors repeatedly entered another resident's room and bed, bypassing ineffective stop sign interventions. Staff observed and were aware of these behaviors but did not consistently report them or update the care plan with effective measures. An incident occurred where the resident was found undressed in another resident's bed, with inappropriate contact observed, highlighting the facility's failure to protect residents from abuse.
A resident with dementia, anxiety, and bipolar disorder was disrespected by a nursing assistant who told them to "shut up" during a stressful day. This incident, overheard by the ADNS, violated the facility's Code of Conduct, which requires treating residents with dignity and respect. The resident expressed feeling upset by the interaction, confirming a deficiency in maintaining their rights.
A resident with dementia, anxiety, and bipolar disorder experienced an abuse incident where a nursing aide told them to "shut up." Following this, social workers provided support visits, but these visits were not documented in the clinical record, leading to a deficiency in maintaining complete and accurate records.
Failure to Protect Cognitively Impaired Resident From Physical Abuse by Staff
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves a failure to protect a resident from abuse when a nurse aide (NA #1) deliberately struck the resident’s head during transport to the resident’s room. Video footage from the date of the incident at approximately 5:51 PM showed NA #1 pushing the resident in a wheelchair into the room, striking the top of the resident’s baseball cap with the left hand, and then striking the left side of the resident’s head with the left hand while passing the roommate’s bed. The video further captured a loud noise immediately followed by the resident yelling, with the resident’s arms remaining on the wheelchair armrests throughout the incident. The facility’s Abuse Policy defines abuse as the willful infliction of injury, intimidation, or punishment resulting in physical harm, pain, or mental anguish, and prohibits such conduct. The resident involved had been admitted in December 2024 and had diagnoses including dementia, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, and anxiety disorder. A comprehensive MDS assessment identified the resident as severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 6, requiring supervision or touch assistance with toileting, dressing, and personal hygiene, and using a wheelchair for transport. The resident’s care plan dated 1/9/26 documented potential for physical and verbal aggression related to dementia with poor impulse control and psychotropic medication use associated with PTSD, major depressive disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. Interventions in the care plan included providing physical and verbal cues to alleviate anxiety, giving positive feedback, assisting the resident to set goals for more pleasant behavior, encouraging the resident to seek staff when agitated, and allowing the resident to vent frustrations. On the day of the incident, the resident experienced an actual psychosocial outcome, evidenced by yelling with audible distress immediately after the loud noise heard on the video. A nursing note later that evening documented that an individual (Person #1) reported alleged abuse of the resident by a staff member, prompting an assessment that found no physical injury and noted the resident was unable to provide details due to dementia. NA #1’s written statement claimed that the aide was adjusting the resident’s hat, that the resident became frustrated and tried to pick up the dinner tray causing a loud noise, and that the aide then backed away and left the room. However, the DNS acknowledged in interview that NA #1’s actions were inappropriate and that no resident was to be struck at any time, and the facility recognized that the resident nonetheless experienced actual psychosocial harm under the reasonable person standard despite the absence of documented physical injury.
Failure to Report Elevated Blood Pressures and Lack of Clear BP Reporting Parameters
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to report elevated blood pressures to the physician and to have clear parameters for reporting abnormal blood pressure readings for a resident with significant medical conditions, including hypertension, intracerebral hemorrhage, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and tracheostomy, hemiplegia, and seizures. Physician orders directed that all medications, including multiple antihypertensives, be administered via g-tube. Documented blood pressures showed an admission reading of 130/83 followed by elevated readings on subsequent days, including 169/84 and 148/89, 151/81, and later 188/100 and 192/98, with warning alerts generated for systolic readings above 139. Review of the clinical record from 4/10/26 to 4/12/26 did not show that the physician was notified of the elevated blood pressures on 4/10/26 and 4/11/26, despite these abnormal values. The resident was care planned for hypertension with interventions to administer medications as ordered, monitor for abnormal cardiac symptoms, check vital signs per facility protocol, and monitor for changes in lung sounds. On 4/12/26, the resident was noted by the RN supervisor to have a change in condition, including lethargy, being warm and clammy, vomiting medication, and requiring suctioning for increased secretions; a manual blood pressure of 188/100 was obtained, and the physician was notified at that time. Interviews with multiple LPNs revealed inconsistent personal thresholds for reporting elevated blood pressures and a lack of knowledge of any facility-wide parameters, with some staff failing to report readings that exceeded their own stated thresholds and, in one case, failing to document a rechecked blood pressure. The DON stated that in the absence of specific physician orders, staff should follow a care path that called for reporting systolic blood pressures over 200, and also confirmed that all vital signs should be documented. The facility did not have a policy for reporting abnormal vital signs in the absence of acute mental status changes, and the existing Change in Condition policy only generally required notifying the healthcare provider of significant changes in physical condition.
Unauthorized Early Installation and Use of Video Monitoring Without Required Written Consent
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to obtain written consent and to follow required timeframes before installing and using a video monitoring device in a shared resident room. One resident, admitted in December 2024 with dementia, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, and anxiety disorder, was identified on a recent MDS as severely cognitively impaired (BIMS score of 6) and requiring supervision or touch assistance with toileting, dressing, and personal hygiene, and used a wheelchair for transport. The resident’s care plan noted potential for physical and verbal aggression related to dementia and psychotropic medication use, with interventions focused on cues to alleviate anxiety and support for more pleasant behavior. On 3/10/26, an LPN spoke with the resident’s responsible party about the roommate’s request to install a camera to observe the roommate. The LPN documented that verbal consent was obtained, assured the responsible party that the camera would not monitor the resident, explained that written consent was required, and emailed the consent paperwork as requested. Despite this, the social worker reported that the facility installed the camera on the roommate’s side of the room on 3/10/26. Video footage from 3/12/26 showed the resident being transported by wheelchair into the room, being struck twice by a staff member, and captured audio of the resident’s verbal outburst. The footage also captured part of the hallway outside the room, the shared bathroom, all parties entering the room or walking by the doorway, and allowed monitoring of the inside of the bathroom when the door was open. The roommate virtual monitoring consent form for the resident was not signed until 3/16/26, and the form, modeled on Connecticut House File #627, specified that virtual monitoring could only begin seven days after submitting written notice and consent, meaning the earliest allowable installation and use date was 3/23/26. The DNS confirmed the camera should not have been installed until after written consent was obtained and the seven-day waiting period had elapsed, and could not explain why it was installed on 3/10/26. The facility did not have a virtual monitoring policy, but provided state guidelines and consent forms that required written notice and consent at least seven days before installing or using such technology, while the facility’s Residents’ Bill of Rights policy affirmed residents’ rights to privacy in personal and medical care and electronic communications.
Failure to Supervise Resident During Acute Change in Condition After EMS Activation
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide adequate supervision and monitoring to a dependent resident during an acute change in condition after EMS was activated. The resident had multiple serious diagnoses, including hypertension, intracerebral hemorrhage, acute respiratory failure with tracheostomy, hemiplegia, gastrostomy tube feeding, and seizures, and was assessed as severely cognitively impaired and dependent for all care, including bed mobility and transfers. The resident’s care plan included interventions such as administering medications as ordered, monitoring for abnormal cardiac symptoms, checking vital signs per facility protocol, providing complete care including repositioning, suctioning as needed, and monitoring respiratory and cardiac status. On the day of the incident, the supervising RN assessed the resident as lethargic, warm, clammy, and having vomited medication, with a blood pressure of 188/100, and documented that the head of the bed was elevated to 90 degrees and suctioning was performed due to increased secretions. The physician was notified and the resident was sent to the ED for possible aspiration or hypertensive urgency. According to staff interviews, an LPN had administered medications earlier that morning when the resident was at baseline, but later found the resident less responsive, clammy, with elevated blood pressure and vomiting. The LPN turned off the tube feeding and called the RN to assess the resident. After assessing the resident and deciding to call 911, the RN left the room to call EMS, notify the family, and complete paperwork, while the LPN resumed passing medications to other residents. The LPN stated that no one remained in the resident’s room until family arrived, and that the resident required additional suctioning and vomited again during transfer to the ambulance stretcher when EMS arrived. A nursing assistant also reported that after 911 was called, she did not continuously stay with the resident and there was no nurse in the room during that time. The DON stated that staff should provide supervision to any resident after 911 is called until EMS arrives and expressed concern that no one stayed with this resident, who had a compromised medical status. Requested policies for Emergency Response, 911 Activation, Aspiration Precautions, and Supervision/Accident Prevention were not provided.
Failure to Use Wheelchair Leg Rests During Assisted Transport
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency related to accident hazards and inadequate supervision during assisted wheelchair transport for one resident. The resident, admitted in December 2024, had dementia, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, and anxiety disorder, and was assessed as severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 6. The comprehensive MDS indicated the resident required supervision or touch assistance with toileting, dressing, and personal hygiene and used a manual wheelchair for transport. The resident’s care plan documented a deficit in functional mobility and directed the use of a standard wheelchair with anti-rollbacks due to the resident’s inability to walk. A wheelchair competency for NA #1 dated 7/29/25 showed that the NA had successfully demonstrated all required elements, including ensuring residents’ feet were safely placed on footrests during transport. Camera footage from 3/12/26 at 5:51 PM showed NA #1 transporting the resident into their room in a wheelchair without attached leg rests, during which the resident intermittently placed their feet on the floor and appeared agitated. PT #1 reported that the resident could not keep their legs raised for an extended period during transport and required constant cueing and multiple reminders to raise their legs, as they frequently rested their feet on the floor. PT #1 stated that placing feet on the floor during assisted wheelchair transport posed a risk of injury and potential ejection from the wheelchair. NA #1 stated that facility practice was to attach leg rests before assisted wheelchair transport, and the DNS confirmed the resident should have had leg rests attached during the transport and that, if leg rests were refused, an alternate means of transport should have been used. The DNS also stated staff had received prior education on assisted wheelchair transport, including attachment of leg rests. The facility did not provide a policy for assisted wheelchair transport when requested.
Failure to Assess and Notify Provider After Resident's Change in Condition
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to ensure timely assessment and provider notification following multiple reports of a resident's change in condition over an 11-day period. The resident, who had diagnoses including dementia, gait abnormalities, and muscle weakness, was severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for most activities of daily living. After an unwitnessed fall, the resident exhibited increasing difficulty with mobility, pain in the left lower extremity, and an inability to bear weight, as documented by physical therapy staff. Despite these ongoing concerns, there was no evidence that nursing staff performed a comprehensive assessment or notified the provider of the resident's declining condition as required by facility policy. Physical therapy and occupational therapy staff repeatedly reported the resident's pain and functional decline to nursing staff and discussed these issues during morning and Medicare meetings. Documentation shows that therapy staff communicated changes in the resident's transfer status and mobility to the Director of Nursing (DON) through the interagency communication system. However, the DON did not review these communications and was not aware of the resident's change in condition until much later. Nursing notes during this period did not reflect any assessment or provider notification in response to the therapy staff's reports. Ultimately, the resident was found to have an acute left hip fracture after an x-ray was ordered following further decline and a new skin tear. Interviews confirmed that the DON and the provider were not notified of the resident's change in condition until the day the fracture was identified. Facility policy required that any change in condition be assessed by a licensed nurse and reported to the physician, but this process was not followed in this case.
Failure to Monitor and Intervene for Resident Wandering Led to Resident-to-Resident Sexual Incident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate monitoring and implement care-planned interventions for a resident with a known history of wandering and severe cognitive impairment. This resident, who required maximum assistance for daily activities and was identified as wandering into other residents' rooms, was not consistently redirected or engaged in structured activities as outlined in the care plan. Prior to dinner, staff observed the resident wandering but did not increase monitoring or implement additional interventions until after an incident occurred. Later that evening, the resident was found partially undressed in another resident's room, where both individuals, each with severe memory deficits and dementia, were observed attempting to initiate sexual contact. The incident was interrupted by staff, and no physical injuries were noted. Documentation and staff interviews confirmed that the resident had a pattern of entering other rooms and that interventions to address this behavior were not fully implemented prior to the event.
Failure to Protect Resident from Physical Abuse During Resident-to-Resident Altercation
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple psychiatric diagnoses was not protected from physical abuse by another resident. The incident involved one resident standing in the doorway to their room when another resident, also with severe cognitive impairment and a history of physical aggression, attempted to enter the room and slapped the first resident on the cheek. The altercation was witnessed by the Recreation Director, who observed the aggressor attempting to enter the room and the subsequent slap, but did not intervene at the time as she was down the hall. The affected resident was noted to be upset and crying after the incident, though no physical marks were observed. The resident who committed the abuse had documented interventions in their care plan to address potential physical aggression, including early intervention when agitated and guidance away from sources of distress. Despite these interventions, the aggressive behavior was not prevented, and the incident occurred in a common area where staff were present but unable to intervene in time. Facility documentation and interviews confirmed that the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from physical abuse, as required by policy.
Failure to Ensure Safe Wheelchair Positioning and Supervision Results in Resident Fall and Injuries
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when staff failed to ensure a resident was properly positioned in a wheelchair while being transported, resulting in the resident falling and sustaining multiple serious injuries, including fractures. The resident, who had diagnoses of dementia, muscle weakness, and impaired mobility, required substantial assistance for transfers and was identified as at risk for falls due to lower extremity weakness and a history of falls. The care plan included interventions such as using a non-slip mat under the wheelchair cushion to prevent sliding. On the day of the incident, a nurse aide assisted the resident from the bathroom but did not ensure the resident was seated all the way back in the wheelchair. The aide then pushed the wheelchair at a fast pace despite the resident's verbal requests to stop, leading to the resident sliding forward and falling out of the wheelchair, hitting a dresser, and sustaining injuries. Witness accounts confirmed that the resident was not properly positioned and that the aide did not respond to the resident's requests to stop. The resident's roommate, who witnessed the event, reported that the aide attempted to move the resident after the fall without seeking immediate assistance from other staff. The facility's investigation into the incident was incomplete. The Director of Nursing did not document or fully investigate witness statements, did not clarify whether the resident was moved after the fall, and was unaware that staff had transferred the resident before EMS arrived. Additionally, there was a delay of nearly an hour before EMS was called, and the facility's policies regarding post-fall procedures and investigation documentation were not fully followed.
Failure to Ensure RN Assessment Before Moving Resident After Fall
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with dementia, impaired mobility, and a history of falls experienced a witnessed fall resulting in significant injuries, including a contusion to the forehead, a bruise to the arm, and pain in the ankle. The resident was being assisted by a nursing assistant who did not ensure proper positioning in the wheelchair and moved the resident too quickly, despite the resident's verbal request to stop. The resident subsequently fell forward out of the wheelchair, hitting their head and sustaining further injuries. The incident was witnessed by the resident's roommate, who confirmed that the nursing assistant did not respond to the resident's request to stop and attempted to move the resident after the fall without using the call bell or seeking immediate staff assistance. Following the fall, staff, including the nursing assistant and other personnel, moved the resident from the floor to a sitting position, then assisted the resident into the wheelchair and subsequently into bed before an RN assessment was completed. Interviews and documentation revealed that the resident was in pain and had visible injuries, and that staff did not keep the resident immobile as required by facility policy until a registered nurse could assess for possible fractures or other injuries. The facility's policies directed that after a fall, the resident should remain immobile until examined and cleared by a licensed nurse, and that a thorough evaluation and documentation should be completed. The investigation found inconsistencies in staff accounts regarding whether the resident was moved prior to assessment, with statements from the roommate and staff indicating that the resident was moved multiple times before EMS arrived. The Director of Nursing was unaware that the resident had been moved and did not interview all witnesses. The failure to ensure the resident was assessed by an RN prior to being moved after a fall with major injury constituted a breach of professional standards and facility policy.
Failure to Protect Cognitively Impaired Resident from Sexual Abuse Due to Ineffective Interventions
Penalty
Summary
A cognitively impaired resident with severe dementia and a history of wandering, entering other residents' rooms, and lying in their beds did not have effective interventions in place to prevent entry into other residents' rooms. The resident was known to crawl under or push through doorway stop signs, which were intended as a deterrent but were not effective in preventing access. Staff, including nurses and nurse aides, observed the resident repeatedly entering a specific peer's room and bed, but these behaviors were not consistently reported to facility leadership, and the ineffective intervention remained in use. An incident occurred in which the resident was found in another resident's bed, undressed from the waist down, with the other resident's hand observed between the resident's legs. The stop sign was not in place at the time of the incident, and staff interviews confirmed that the stop sign was often missing or ineffective, as the resident could bypass it. Despite ongoing observations of the resident's wandering and inappropriate behaviors, the care plan did not include more effective or individualized interventions to address the risk of resident-to-resident abuse. Documentation errors were also present, as the facility incorrectly recorded that a next of kin was the resident's healthcare proxy and had consented to intimate relationships, when in fact no legal paperwork existed. The facility's abuse policy required individualized care plans and immediate action on abuse allegations, but staff failed to update the care plan with effective interventions or report the ongoing issues to leadership. This lack of effective action and communication resulted in a finding of Immediate Jeopardy.
Resident Dignity Compromised by Staff Interaction
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity, as evidenced by an incident involving a nursing assistant (NA #1) and a resident. The resident, who had diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, and bipolar disorder, was alert and oriented with no behaviors, requiring maximal assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). During the incident, NA #1, who was having a bad day, told the resident to "shut up" after the resident's roommate commented on NA #1's interaction with another resident. This interaction was overheard by the Assistant Director of Nursing Services (ADNS) and documented in a nursing note. The facility's Code of Conduct mandates that residents are treated with courtesy, respect, and dignity, which was violated in this instance. The incident was reported, and the resident expressed that being told to "shut up" did not make them feel good, indicating a failure to uphold the resident's right to a dignified existence and self-determination. Interviews with staff confirmed the inappropriate behavior of NA #1, who admitted to the comment and acknowledged it was inappropriate. The facility's documentation and interviews with staff corroborated the incident, highlighting a deficiency in maintaining the resident's rights.
Incomplete Documentation of Social Service Visits After Abuse Incident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records for a resident involved in an abuse incident. The resident, diagnosed with dementia, anxiety, and bipolar disorder, required maximal assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) and was identified as alert and oriented with no behaviors according to a recent assessment. An incident occurred where a nursing aide inappropriately told the resident to "shut up" during an interaction, which was documented in a Reportable Events Form. Following the incident, social workers provided support visits to the resident, but these visits were not documented in the clinical record. The deficiency was identified through a review of clinical records, facility documentation, and interviews. Social Worker #1 confirmed that she and another social worker provided support visits to the resident on multiple occasions following the incident, but failed to document these visits. The lack of documentation for the social service visits provided to the resident after the incident indicates a failure to ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate, as required by professional standards.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 703 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 9 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Marlborough
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glastonbury Center For Health & Rehabilitation | 6.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 12 | 0 |
| Cobalt Lodge Health Care And Rehabilitation Center | 7.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 1 |
| Civita Care Center At Salmon Brook | 8 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Westside Care Center | 8.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Touchpoints At Manchester | 8.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 16 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Marlborough Health & Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.