Failure to Report Elevated Blood Pressures and Lack of Clear BP Reporting Parameters
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to report elevated blood pressures to the physician and to have clear parameters for reporting abnormal blood pressure readings for a resident with significant medical conditions, including hypertension, intracerebral hemorrhage, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and tracheostomy, hemiplegia, and seizures. Physician orders directed that all medications, including multiple antihypertensives, be administered via g-tube. Documented blood pressures showed an admission reading of 130/83 followed by elevated readings on subsequent days, including 169/84 and 148/89, 151/81, and later 188/100 and 192/98, with warning alerts generated for systolic readings above 139. Review of the clinical record from 4/10/26 to 4/12/26 did not show that the physician was notified of the elevated blood pressures on 4/10/26 and 4/11/26, despite these abnormal values. The resident was care planned for hypertension with interventions to administer medications as ordered, monitor for abnormal cardiac symptoms, check vital signs per facility protocol, and monitor for changes in lung sounds. On 4/12/26, the resident was noted by the RN supervisor to have a change in condition, including lethargy, being warm and clammy, vomiting medication, and requiring suctioning for increased secretions; a manual blood pressure of 188/100 was obtained, and the physician was notified at that time. Interviews with multiple LPNs revealed inconsistent personal thresholds for reporting elevated blood pressures and a lack of knowledge of any facility-wide parameters, with some staff failing to report readings that exceeded their own stated thresholds and, in one case, failing to document a rechecked blood pressure. The DON stated that in the absence of specific physician orders, staff should follow a care path that called for reporting systolic blood pressures over 200, and also confirmed that all vital signs should be documented. The facility did not have a policy for reporting abnormal vital signs in the absence of acute mental status changes, and the existing Change in Condition policy only generally required notifying the healthcare provider of significant changes in physical condition.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.