Unauthorized Early Installation and Use of Video Monitoring Without Required Written Consent
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to obtain written consent and to follow required timeframes before installing and using a video monitoring device in a shared resident room. One resident, admitted in December 2024 with dementia, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, and anxiety disorder, was identified on a recent MDS as severely cognitively impaired (BIMS score of 6) and requiring supervision or touch assistance with toileting, dressing, and personal hygiene, and used a wheelchair for transport. The resident’s care plan noted potential for physical and verbal aggression related to dementia and psychotropic medication use, with interventions focused on cues to alleviate anxiety and support for more pleasant behavior. On 3/10/26, an LPN spoke with the resident’s responsible party about the roommate’s request to install a camera to observe the roommate. The LPN documented that verbal consent was obtained, assured the responsible party that the camera would not monitor the resident, explained that written consent was required, and emailed the consent paperwork as requested. Despite this, the social worker reported that the facility installed the camera on the roommate’s side of the room on 3/10/26. Video footage from 3/12/26 showed the resident being transported by wheelchair into the room, being struck twice by a staff member, and captured audio of the resident’s verbal outburst. The footage also captured part of the hallway outside the room, the shared bathroom, all parties entering the room or walking by the doorway, and allowed monitoring of the inside of the bathroom when the door was open. The roommate virtual monitoring consent form for the resident was not signed until 3/16/26, and the form, modeled on Connecticut House File #627, specified that virtual monitoring could only begin seven days after submitting written notice and consent, meaning the earliest allowable installation and use date was 3/23/26. The DNS confirmed the camera should not have been installed until after written consent was obtained and the seven-day waiting period had elapsed, and could not explain why it was installed on 3/10/26. The facility did not have a virtual monitoring policy, but provided state guidelines and consent forms that required written notice and consent at least seven days before installing or using such technology, while the facility’s Residents’ Bill of Rights policy affirmed residents’ rights to privacy in personal and medical care and electronic communications.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Failure to protect resident medical information on the 2B med cart. During a med pass, an RN left the cart unattended in the hallway with the computer screen open and displaying identifiable resident information, and later confirmed that anyone passing by could see residents' personal and confidential data.
An LPN on the Cardinal Unit left a laptop screen open and papers with resident personal information on top of the med cart outside a resident room, making the information visible to anyone passing by. The LPN confirmed the screen was not closed and the papers were left exposed, contrary to the facility policy for maintaining confidentiality during med administration.
A resident's door had a posted "Feeder" sign, and meal tickets for several residents were placed where they could be seen by the public on a hall. The sign and tickets contained resident-specific information, including names, room numbers, and dietary instructions, and staff confirmed the postings were used to direct feeding and meal service. The DON stated the postings were HIPAA and resident rights issues because they exposed PHI and affected resident dignity and privacy.
An LVN left 19 residents’ medical records tucked under a laptop on an unattended treatment cart in a hallway. The records included names, DOBs, diagnoses, treatment plans, and several wound photos, and the LVN stated this violated HIPAA and residents’ privacy and confidentiality rights.
Failure to Protect Resident Confidential Information: A resident’s shower sheet containing personal health information was left unattended on the nurse counter in full view at the 400-nurse station. The ADON, Administrator, and DON all identified the incident as a HIPAA and privacy violation, and CNA B stated she had no reason for leaving the information uncovered despite prior HIPAA training.
Opened Resident Mail: Two cognitively intact residents did not receive unopened correspondence. One resident received VA mail that had been opened and taped shut, and staff and family still had the envelope. For another resident, staff opened and sorted cards and letters from the public, said some were inappropriate, and did not ask the resident whether he wanted the mail opened or read to him. Staff acknowledged residents have the right to receive mail unopened, and facility records showed no care plan focus related to mail privacy.
Failure to Protect Resident Medical Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of residents' medical information on one of five medication carts, the 2B Medication Cart. During a medication pass observation, the Registered Nurse left the medication cart unattended in the hallway with the computer screen open and displaying resident information. In an interview shortly afterward, the RN confirmed that the cart had been left unattended with the screen open and that identifiable resident information could be seen by anyone passing by, resulting in a failure to keep residents' personal and confidential medical information private.
Resident Information Left Visible on Medication Cart
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of residents' medical information on one of five units, the Cardinal Unit. The facility policy on Medication Administration/Disposition stated that confidential resident health information is to be maintained during medication administration, with the electronic health record in privacy mode when the nurse is away from the medication cart and paper documentation kept in a closed binder. During an observation on the Cardinal Unit, an LPN left the laptop screen open and papers displaying resident personal information on top of the medication cart outside a resident room, making the information visible to anyone passing by. In an interview shortly afterward, the LPN confirmed that the laptop screen was not closed and that papers with resident personal information were left on the medication cart.
Confidential Resident Information Posted in Public View
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect the confidentiality of resident health information when a sign reading "Feeder" was posted on a resident's door. The resident's family member, who was the resident's representative and power of attorney due to dementia and Alzheimer's disease, reported seeing the sign taped to the door of the resident's private room and showed a screenshot of the posted sign. The family member told an LVN that the sign was demeaning and degrading, and the LVN later confirmed that the sign had been on the resident's door and that she removed it. The facility also failed to keep meal ticket information private for six residents on the 700 Hall. During observation, six lunch meal tickets were seen posted behind the name plate of two residents' rooms, and the tickets included each resident's name, room number, and dietary notes with special instructions. The tickets were visible to the public and anyone with access to the hall. CNA staff stated that residents on the hall ate in their rooms and that meal tickets were placed on the wall behind the name plate so kitchen staff could serve the correct meals. Interviews with CNA staff and the LVN showed that staff were aware the meal tickets contained resident information and were used to guide meal service, but the tickets were still placed where they could be seen by others. The DON stated that a sign posted on a resident's door with medical information would be a HIPAA violation and a resident rights issue, and that meal tickets in public view would also violate HIPAA. The facility policy stated that PHI should not be intentionally or unintentionally disclosed and that written PHI should not be easily accessible to unauthorized staff or visitors.
Unattended resident records left under laptop on treatment cart
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect the privacy and confidentiality of 19 residents’ medical records when LVN 8 left the records tucked under a laptop computer on top of an unattended treatment cart in the hallway between Nursing Station 1 and a resident room. During the tour, surveyors observed two binder-clipped stacks and one loose stack of papers under the laptop computer on Treatment Cart A. When the surveyor looked at the documents, the papers were identified as medical records for Residents 7, 9, 13, 23, 26, 27, 33, 39, 45, 53, 55, 57, 60, 65, 82, 101, 106, 107, and 129. The records contained resident names, dates of birth, diagnoses, and treatment plans. Several of the records also contained black-and-white photographs of wounds, including those for Residents 7, 23, 45, 55, 57, 65, 106, and 107. The loose pages included nursing assignments for the same day. LVN 8 stated the records were placed under the laptop because they were believed to be safer there and later stated that leaving them there unattended violated HIPAA and residents’ rights to privacy and confidentiality. The residents whose records were exposed had a range of conditions, including dementia, severely impaired cognition, fluctuating capacity, dysphagia, diabetes, Parkinson’s disease, hemiplegia, malnutrition, and mobility limitations. Some residents were documented as lacking capacity to understand and make medical decisions, while others had severely impaired cognition or fluctuating capacity. Facility staff interviewed after the observation stated that medical records should not be left under a laptop computer on a treatment cart and that such records were accessible to anyone in the hallway.
Failure to Protect Resident Confidential Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect the confidentiality of personal health care information for 1 of 8 residents reviewed. On 07/30/2026 at 10:15 AM, during observation of the 400-nurse station, a shower sheet for Resident #1 was left unattended for approximately three minutes in full view on the nurse counter. The shower sheet was used to document scars, skin abnormalities, or wounds, and it contained the resident’s personal, private information. Record review showed Resident #1 was an [AGE]-year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of paralytic ileus, essential hypertension, and lymphedema. During interviews, the ADON stated staff were trained on HIPAA and resident rights and acknowledged that leaving resident information in the open could allow others to see wound information and affect privacy. The Administrator stated leaving the shower sheet open at the nurse station was a HIPAA violation and a dignity violation. The DON also stated leaving patient information open on the desk and leaving the desk was a HIPAA violation and privacy concern. CNA B stated she had no reason for leaving the resident’s personal information uncovered and said she had been trained to turn shower sheets over or put them in her pocket.
Opened Resident Mail
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to allow two residents to receive unopened mail at the facility. For Resident #35, record review showed a male resident with diagnoses including COPD, hypertension, age-related physical debility, and cognitive communication deficit, while his annual MDS assessment showed a BIMS score of 15, indicating he was cognitively intact. His care plan contained no focus or intervention related to his ability to receive mail in the facility. Resident #108 was also cognitively intact, with a BIMS score of 14, and had diagnoses including Type 2 diabetes, Parkinsonism, and PTSD; his care plan likewise contained no focus or intervention related to receiving mail in the facility. Resident #108 stated he received a piece of mail from the VA that had been opened and taped shut, and his family member had the opened envelope. The envelope was observed and appeared to have been opened with a letter opener and then taped. The REC stated that she and the security guard handled mail, that she sorted mail when it was received, and that mail addressed to residents was opened and then sent to the corporate office or to family members. She also stated that residents have the right to receive mail unopened and that she did not understand why Resident #108’s mail was opened. For Resident #35, staff stated that cards and letters from the public were opened and sorted because some were considered inappropriate, and that staff did not speak with Resident #35 before opening them. AA R stated the resident was not asked whether he wanted the cards opened in front of him or filtered, and acknowledged that residents have the right to open their own mail. Resident #35 stated he received cards that were opened. The AD stated staff had a meeting and said the cards must be read to him, while the ADM stated the resident should have made the decision about whether to read the cards and that one card was filtered out. The FM stated the facility had permission to do everything they did and that the facility read a bad card and the FM told the facility not to read it to him.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.