Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Conway Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Delayed response to PEG alarm, call light, and pain needs. Staff did not promptly respond to a beeping PEG pump for one resident who was severely impaired and dependent on staff, and another resident’s call light was left out of reach while the resident reported butt pain and waited about 30 minutes for help back to bed. The DON and Administrator stated call lights were expected to be answered within minutes, and the Administrator said PEG alarms should not beep for 50 minutes.
Two residents received perineal care without proper hand hygiene between dirty and clean tasks. CNAs cleaned one resident’s perineal area, handled a bedside drawer and ointment without changing soiled gloves, and for another resident wiped the buttocks, skin folds, and urinary meatus, then touched items such as the lift, clothing, wheelchair, and drawer before removing dirty gloves. The DON confirmed hand hygiene was needed between clean and dirty tasks to prevent cross contamination, and the facility had no perineal care policy.
A resident who was cognitively intact and admitted for anxiety disorder was discharged to another facility despite having filed an appeal against the involuntary discharge. Staff and the Medical Director reported no evidence of physical abuse or smoking policy violations by the resident. The Ombudsman and the resident's family confirmed the appeal was filed before the discharge, but the facility proceeded with the transfer in violation of policy requiring appeals to be resolved prior to discharge.
Medication administration errors exceeded the allowed rate, with a 6.67% error rate during observation of 30 meds. An LPN gave a resident the wrong eye drops and dose for dry eyes, and a MAC gave another resident the wrong strength of an anti-flatulent medication. Staff stated the ordered eye drops were not available, but the MD was not notified and the substitution was not clarified or documented.
A resident was given another resident’s medications during a med pass after an RN was interrupted and failed to verify the MAR before administration. The resident became drowsy with altered mental status, required oxygen, IV fluids, and two doses of an opioid antagonist, and was sent to the hospital, where records documented acute toxic encephalopathy from accidental administration of multiple sedating meds including Seroquel, alprazolam, and hydrocodone.
An unlocked medication cart was observed parked in front of the nurse's station, and the DON later locked it after confirming carts should be locked to prevent residents from going into them. An LPN then approached the same cart and stated she did not realize it was unlocked, while the Administrator later confirmed medication carts should always be locked. The facility policy stated medications are stored safely, securely, and properly.
The facility failed to maintain a safe and homelike environment, with observations of cluttered floors, detached wall vinyl, and wall rails posing potential hazards. Maintenance was unavailable, and no requests for repairs were documented, indicating a lack of proactive measures to address these issues.
The facility failed to prevent continuous verbal and physical altercations between two residents, despite multiple incidents and staff interventions. These altercations caused distress among other residents and posed a serious risk of harm, leading to a determination of non-compliance with federal regulations.
The facility failed to ensure interventions were utilized to prevent worsening of contractures for two residents. One resident did not have a left elbow extension brace or cushion boots as required, and another resident did not have a hand brace in place, leading to worsening contractures. Both a CNA and an RN confirmed that the absence of these interventions could lead to further complications.
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions and properly clean food preparation equipment and utensils in the kitchen. Observations included expired food items, unsanitary surfaces, and improper cleaning of a food processor used to prepare food for residents. Kitchen utensils were also stored in a manner that exposed them to contaminants.
The facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene by laundry staff between resident rooms while delivering clean laundry and did not keep a trash barrel covered, allowing a resident with severe cognitive impairment to dig through the trash. Staff interviews revealed a lack of adherence to infection control policies and delayed action in addressing the need for a trash barrel lid.
The facility failed to provide pneumonia vaccines to two residents despite having obtained their consent. The current process involves Social Services obtaining consent and uploading it into the chart, but there is a lack of clarity on who ensures the orders are completed, leading to the deficiency.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses was found unable to reach their call light due to improper placement and a fall mat blocking access. The care plan required the call light to be within reach, but this was not adhered to, as confirmed by a CNA.
The facility failed to update the care plan for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and aggressive behaviors. Despite a care plan revision indicating placement on a secured unit, the resident was returned to a regular room after family opposition. The Administrator was unaware of issues with the resident's vulnerable roommate, and the MDS Coordinator stressed the importance of an accurate care plan for quality care.
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication. The resident, with severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses, was prescribed Depakote and Quetiapine without appropriate clinical indications or implementation of gradual dose reductions (GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions. Interviews revealed a lack of understanding of the medications' appropriate use and regulatory requirements.
Delayed response to PEG alarm, call light, and pain needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide resident-centered care for two dependent residents by not responding in a timely manner to a feeding tube alarm, leaving a call light out of reach, and not addressing pain promptly. The report states that staff did not respond to the beeping PEG tube for one resident for an extended period, while another resident’s call light was placed on the bed and out of reach, and the resident reported pain while waiting for assistance. Resident #8 was observed resting with eyes closed while the tube feed pump was beeping and displaying a message that the tube slip was detected and the cassette needed to be removed and reloaded. The resident had diagnoses including stroke, failure to thrive, and dementia, and the MDS described the resident as severely impaired, unable to respond, and dependent on staff for bathing, eating, toileting, dressing, and personal care. The resident’s care plan identified risk for fluid volume deficit related to tube feeding, and the MAR showed enteral feeding at 60 mL/hour with water flushes. Staff passed by the room without responding to the alarm, and the LPN later stated the pump had last been rounded on at 12:30 PM, with rounds expected every two hours. Resident #69 was observed sitting in a wheelchair, raising the right leg and arm, and stating that the butt hurt from sitting there. The resident said the roommate’s feeding pump had been beeping since the caregiver left around 1:30 PM, and the resident’s call light was on the bed and out of reach. The resident pointed out staff walking past the open door, and when the call light was eventually answered, the resident said they needed to get off their butt because they were hurting. CNA #6 turned off the call light and left the room, and the resident was not placed back in bed until about 30 minutes after using the call light. The resident’s diagnoses included stroke affecting the left side, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cervical radiculopathy, and the MDS showed cognitive intactness, dependence for toileting and personal care, maximum to total dependence for dressing, and scheduled pain medication. The MAR showed a pain patch and narcotic tablet for pain, and the care plan directed staff to encourage use of the call light and assist with repositioning.
Failure to Perform Hand Hygiene During Perineal Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene during perineal care for two residents observed during bowel and bladder care. For one resident, two CNAs assisted with brief care, cleaned the front perineal area and buttocks, and then one CNA opened the bedside drawer and handled ointment and returned wipes to the drawer without changing soiled gloves. The resident had diagnoses including stroke, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and protein malnutrition, and required total care for toileting, personal care, and lower-body dressing, with maximum assistance for bathing. For the second resident, two CNAs provided perineal care while using a sit-to-stand lift. One CNA removed the wet brief, wiped the buttocks, front skin folds, and urinary meatus, then stored wipes in a drawer and pulled the resident’s clothing up before both CNAs removed their dirty gloves. The resident had diagnoses including dementia, overactive bladder, and ataxia, was severely impaired on the MDS, required total care, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. During interviews, CNAs stated they were trained to wash hands and wear gloves before perineal care and to remove gloves and wash hands when done, and both acknowledged gloves should have been changed during care to prevent cross contamination. They also stated there was no time to change gloves during care with closed unit residents and that they had touched the lift, clothing, wheelchair, and drawer while wearing dirty gloves. The DON confirmed hand hygiene was needed between clean and dirty tasks to prevent cross contamination and stated the facility did not have a perineal care policy. The Administrator stated staff should sanitize hands and wear gloves before perineal care and remove gloves and sanitize hands when going from dirty to clean.
Resident Discharged Despite Pending Appeal
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to comply with regulations regarding the discharge of a resident who had filed an appeal against an involuntary discharge. The resident, who was cognitively intact and admitted with an anxiety disorder, was issued a 30-day discharge notice. Despite the resident filing an appeal on the same day the notice was given, the facility proceeded to discharge the resident to another facility the following day. The care plan for the resident did not indicate any anticipated discharge, and there was no documentation of smoking behavior or physical abuse by the resident. Multiple staff members, including CNAs and the Medical Director, reported no knowledge or evidence of the resident being physically abusive or violating smoking policies. Interviews with the resident, their family member, and the Ombudsman confirmed that the resident did not want to be discharged and had filed an appeal prior to being removed from the facility. The Ombudsman stated that the appeal was cancelled only after the resident had already been discharged. Facility policy and federal regulations prohibit the transfer or discharge of a resident while an appeal is pending, unless there is a documented risk to health or safety, which was not substantiated in this case. The Administrator acknowledged awareness of the pending appeal but chose to proceed with the discharge regardless.
Medication Administration Errors Exceeded Allowed Rate
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to keep the medication error rate below 5%, with a calculated error rate of 6.67% based on observations of 30 medications administered. During medication pass observations, an LPN administered one drop of [Other Brand Name] eye drops in each eye to Resident #35 for dry eyes, even though the resident had an order for [Brand Name] eye drops, two drops in both eyes twice a day. The eye drops had been ordered since 11/18/2024. During another observation, a MAC administered one 125 mg chewable anti-flatulent tablet to Resident #76, while the resident had an order for 80 mg of an anti-flatulent medication twice a day for gas. Interviews revealed the facility was using [Other Brand Name] eye drops because the ordered [Brand Name] eye drops were not available in the medication room, and staff were unsure whether the physician had been notified. The ADON stated the order was not clarified with the Medical Director and he was not notified that the ordered eye drops were unavailable. The Medical Director stated he should be contacted if an ordered medication was not available and that a substitution should be ordered and documented. The DON and Administrator also stated staff should contact the doctor if a medication is not available.
Medication Error Resulted in Wrong Resident Receiving Sedating Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident was free from a significant medication error when a nurse inadvertently administered another resident’s medications to the resident, who was cognitively intact and generally independent with activities of daily living. The resident had multiple diagnoses including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, Alzheimer’s disease, anxiety disorder, PTSD, COPD, constipation, a history of falls, sleep apnea, and insomnia. The resident later reported being taken to the hospital after being given the wrong medications and stated the medications belonged to another resident who lived down the hall. The medication error occurred during the morning medication pass when the nurse was interrupted by other residents and placed prepared medications in the cart drawer. When the nurse returned, the resident was sitting at the cart, and the nurse gave the resident the previously prepared medications without checking the MAR. The nurse later realized the resident’s own medications were still in the cart and reported that the resident appeared drowsy. The nurse notified the DON and APRN, and the resident was assessed as having an altered mental status with decreased oxygen saturation and altered level of consciousness. The resident received oxygen, IV fluids, and two doses of an opioid antagonist before being sent to the hospital. Hospital records documented acute toxic encephalopathy secondary to accidental administration of multiple medications capable of altering mentation. The resident had been given sedating medications that were not prescribed for them, including Seroquel, paroxetine, meclizine, gabapentin, aspirin, cyclobenzaprine, alprazolam, ciprofloxacin, methylphenidate, and hydrocodone. The record also noted the resident was not on sedating medications at the nursing home and that the resident was monitored in the ICU without complications before returning to the facility. Interviews with the nurse, DON, medical director, and administrator confirmed the medication was given without matching the resident, MAR, and medication card as required by facility policy.
Unlocked Medication Cart Observed
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that one of four medication carts was always locked. During an observation on 08/20/2025 at 10:18 AM, a medication cart was seen parked in front of the nurse's station and left unlocked. At 10:21 AM, the DON walked by the cart and locked it, and she confirmed that medication carts should be locked to prevent residents from going into them. At 10:28 AM, an LPN walked to the same unlocked medication cart and stated it was used for residents on the 200 and 300 halls; she said she did not realize it was unlocked and confirmed the cart should always be locked for resident safety. During an interview on 08/21/2025 at 4:33 PM, the Administrator stated medication carts should always be locked to keep residents safe. A review of the facility policy, Medications Storage in the Facility, stated that medications are stored safely, securely, and properly.
Facility Fails to Maintain Safe and Homelike Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe and homelike environment, as evidenced by several observations during environmental rounds. In one room, clutter was observed on the floor, including cardboard boxes, shoes, clothes, personal documents, books, magazines, and plastic grocery bags of clothes, which were spread out between and in front of the privacy curtain. Additionally, a bedside table obstructed the sink pathway, with detached cords lying on the floor. In the dining room, wall vinyl was detaching, and the floor had discolored stains and debris. Another room had a wall rail detached from the wall, held up by a bedside table, and vinyl trim was detached from the wall with gashes present, exposing a grainy white substance. During a tour with the Administrator and the Corporate Nurse Consultant, it was revealed that maintenance was not available, and there were no maintenance requests for the observed issues in the facility's Maintenance Request Book. The Administrator acknowledged the absence of maintenance, and the Corporate Nurse Consultant stated that repairs would be made immediately. However, the lack of documented maintenance requests indicates a failure to address environmental hazards proactively, contributing to the unsafe conditions observed.
Failure to Prevent Resident-to-Resident Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse, resulting in continuous altercations of verbal and physical abuse between two residents. Resident #47, who has diagnoses including cerebral palsy, bipolar disorder, and PTSD, and Resident #54, who has Down Syndrome and generalized anxiety disorder, were involved in multiple incidents. These altercations included verbal threats and physical aggression, such as kicking and ramming wheelchairs, which were witnessed by other residents and staff. Despite previous incidents and attempts to separate the residents, the facility did not effectively prevent further altercations, leading to a significant risk of harm to all residents in the facility. On multiple occasions, staff observed and intervened in altercations between Resident #47 and Resident #54. For example, on one occasion, Resident #54 rammed their wheelchair into Resident #47, leading to a heated argument and physical aggression. Staff attempted to separate and calm the residents, but the altercations continued to occur. Witnesses, including other residents and staff members, reported that these incidents were frequent and disruptive, causing distress among other residents. Despite these observations, the facility's interventions were insufficient to prevent further incidents. Interviews with staff and residents revealed that the altercations between Resident #47 and Resident #54 were a common occurrence, with some residents expressing feelings of unsafety and disturbance. Staff members reported that they tried to keep the residents apart and monitored them, but these measures were not effective in preventing the altercations. The facility's failure to implement effective interventions and protect residents from abuse led to a determination of non-compliance with federal regulations, posing a serious risk of harm to the residents.
Removal Plan
- Resident #47 was placed on 1 on 1 observation by nursing staff for verbal altercation that occurred in the dining room.
- Resident #54 was placed on 1 on 1 observation by nursing staff for verbal altercation that occurred in the dining room.
- Resident #47 was transported to [local hospital] for medical clearance to be evaluated and treated for behavioral health.
- Nurse consultant in-serviced Administrator, Assistant Administrator, and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on ensuring any resident-to-resident altercation and any residents that witness the altercation are assessed for psychosocial affects and offered Mental Health Services if needed.
- Assistant Administrator in-serviced all staff on duty on Resident-to-Resident altercations, to stop the altercation immediately, and protect the resident involved. This includes any resident that witnessed the altercation to ensure an assessment is completed to ensure their psychosocial wellbeing is addressed and any Mental Health issues are assessed. Assistant administrator will in-service all oncoming employees before starting assigned shifts.
- Assistant Administrator interviewed all residents that are interviewable for any psychosocial distress and offered mental health care as needed.
- Nurse consultant contacted our behavioral health provider to immediately see any residents that have been negatively affected and were available as needed. Mental Health services provider was notified.
Failure to Prevent Worsening of Contractures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure interventions were utilized to prevent worsening of contractures for two residents. Resident #40 had diagnoses of abnormal posture, stiffness of the left shoulder, and stiffness of the left elbow. The care plan indicated the resident required a restorative program to maintain range of motion and prevent contractures, including the use of a left elbow extension brace and cushion boots. However, observations on multiple occasions revealed that these interventions were not in place. Both a CNA and an RN confirmed that the absence of these interventions could lead to worsening contractures and the development of pressure ulcers. Additionally, the resident's care plan was not being followed as prescribed, leading to potential harm to the resident's condition. Resident #66 had a diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis after a cerebral vascular incident and required a hand brace for at least 16 hours a day. Despite this, observations showed that the resident did not have the hand brace in place, and the contracture had worsened. The CNA mentioned that the resident could not handle the brace anymore and inserted a washcloth in the resident's hand as an alternative. The RN was unaware of the specific interventions in place for the resident's contracture, indicating a lack of proper communication and adherence to the care plan. The absence of necessary interventions led to the worsening of the resident's condition, highlighting a significant deficiency in the facility's care practices.
Unsanitary Conditions and Improper Cleaning Practices in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that dishes and utensils were stored under sanitary conditions and that food preparation equipment was cleaned properly in the kitchen. Observations by the surveyor revealed multiple instances of unsanitary conditions, including a hand washing station with water leaking from the base, creating a red-brown stain, and an eye wash station covered in red/brown spots with debris inside. Expired food items, such as tortillas, were found in storage, and various kitchen surfaces, including the backsplash and surveillance camera, were covered in yellow/brown and brownish-gray material, respectively. Additionally, a medium-sized hole was observed in the ceiling, and fans in the kitchen were coated in gray/black matter. The venti hood and surrounding areas were also found to be covered in yellow/brown matter, with a nozzle dripping off the orange rubber piece and a white plastic pipe thickly coated in the same substance. The dishwashing area had discolored tiles, missing tiles, and a large crack in the back wall, with a red/brown stain on one of the tiles and a hole in the middle of it. The back wall of the three-compartment sink was discolored, and a faucet was continuously dripping. The food processor was observed to have soap bubbles and water inside after being run through the dishwasher, and it was used to prepare food for residents without being properly cleaned. Kitchen utensils were stored in a manner that exposed them to contaminants, and a dietary aide was observed touching the inside of a scoop before using it to prepare food for residents on pureed diets. The dietary manager confirmed that the cleaning schedule was the only one in use, and it was evident that the schedule was not being followed adequately. The surveyor observed multiple instances of unsanitary conditions and improper cleaning practices, which were confirmed by the dietary manager and dietary aide. The facility's failure to maintain sanitary conditions and properly clean food preparation equipment and utensils posed a risk to the health and safety of the residents. The observations made by the surveyor highlighted significant deficiencies in the facility's adherence to professional standards for food storage, preparation, and distribution.
Infection Control and Trash Barrel Coverage Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed by laundry staff between resident rooms while delivering clean laundry. During an observation, a laundry employee was seen coughing into her hands and then handling clean laundry without sanitizing her hands. This practice was repeated as the employee moved from one resident room to another, delivering laundry and collecting empty hangers without performing hand hygiene. Interviews with the laundry staff revealed a lack of awareness and adherence to the facility's infection control policies, which require hand sanitization before and after entering resident rooms. Additionally, the facility failed to keep a trash barrel covered, which allowed a resident with severe cognitive impairment to dig through the trash. The resident was observed moving garbage around and lifting items from the barrel, which was located in a common area without a lid. Interviews with staff indicated that there was awareness of the need for a lid on the trash barrel, but it had not been promptly addressed. The Assistant Director of Nursing and the Administrator confirmed that trash barrels should be covered to prevent infection and resident access, and that lids had been recently ordered but not yet implemented.
Failure to Administer Pneumonia Vaccines
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a pneumonia vaccine for two residents, despite having obtained their consent. The facility's policy specified that each resident should be assessed for pneumococcal immunization upon admission and offered the vaccine unless medically contraindicated or already immunized. However, a review of the electronic health records for both residents showed no information indicating that the pneumonia vaccine was administered, even though consent forms were signed and dated for both residents. The Infection Control Preventionist (IPC) confirmed that the vaccines were never administered and mentioned that the facility was working on a process for vaccine notifications. During interviews, it was revealed that the current process involves Social Services obtaining consent from new residents and uploading the document into their chart. The nurse is then supposed to check the computer for the document and order the vaccine. However, Social Services was not aware of who ensures that the orders are actually completed. This lack of clarity and communication led to the failure in administering the pneumococcal vaccines to the two residents.
Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's call device was within reach, which is a critical aspect of accommodating the needs and preferences of residents. Resident #29, who has severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, Type 2 diabetes, and a history of repeated falls, was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the middle of the room with the call light lying across the bed on top of the linens. The resident was unable to reach the call light due to a fall mat impeding access to the bed. This situation was confirmed during an interview with CNA #2, who acknowledged that the call light should have been within reach and moved the resident's wheelchair closer to the bed to rectify the situation. The resident's care plan, which was initiated on 06/01/2020, specifically included an approach to ensure the call light was within reach to mitigate the risk of falls and serious injury. Despite this, the call light was not accessible to Resident #29 at the time of the surveyor's observation. The CNA's statement and subsequent actions confirmed the deficiency, highlighting a lapse in adhering to the care plan and ensuring the resident's safety and ability to call for assistance when needed.
Failure to Update Care Plan for Resident with Severe Cognitive Impairment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to update the care plan for a resident with severe cognitive impairment, Down Syndrome, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Unspecified Intellectual Disabilities. The resident exhibited disruptive and aggressive behaviors, including yelling at other residents and staff, throwing items, and physically aggressing towards others. Despite a care plan revision indicating the resident was placed on a male secured unit to decrease stimuli, the resident was later returned to a regular room on the 400 hall after a care plan conference where the family opposed the suggested placement. The facility did not update the care plan to reflect these changes accurately. The Administrator acknowledged that the resident was moved to see if a decrease in stimuli would help but was returned to the original hall after being hit. The Administrator was unaware of any issues with the resident's vulnerable, non-verbal, and fully dependent roommate, despite the resident's aggressive behavior towards them. The MDS Coordinator emphasized the importance of an accurate care plan for providing the best quality of care, noting that inaccuracies could result in unmet needs for the resident.
Failure to Ensure Residents Are Free from Unnecessary Psychotropic Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medication, specifically for one resident who was prescribed Depakote and Quetiapine. Resident #51, who had Alzheimer's disease with late onset, unspecified dementia, depression, PTSD, and unspecified convulsions, was receiving Depakote for seizures and behaviors and Quetiapine for PTSD. The physician orders for these medications did not include an end date, and the clinical indications for their use were not aligned with the FDA-approved indications for these drugs. Interviews with the LPN and ADON revealed a lack of understanding of the appropriate clinical indications for these medications and the process for addressing unnecessary medications with the physician, including the use of gradual dose reductions (GDR). The facility did not implement GDR or non-pharmacological interventions prior to or instead of continuing the psychotropic medications, as required by regulations. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated that Resident #51 had severe cognitive impairment and exhibited behavioral symptoms 1 to 3 days a week. Despite this, the facility did not adequately address the necessity of the psychotropic medications. The LPN and ADON both acknowledged that the resident was receiving these medications for behaviors and mood stabilization, but they did not demonstrate a clear understanding of the appropriate use of these medications or the regulatory requirements for GDR and non-pharmacological interventions. This deficiency highlights a failure in the facility's medication management practices and oversight by the interdisciplinary team (IDT).
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 79 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Conway
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salem Place Nursing And Rehabilitation Center, Inc | 0.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Heritage Living Center | 1.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| The Blossoms At Conway Rehab & Nursing Center | 1.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Superior Health & Rehab, Llc | 2.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Greenbrier Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 11.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Conway Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.