Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Eagle Pointe Healthcare Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility did not consistently serve meals at the posted times, with observations showing residents in the Memory Care unit becoming agitated due to delayed dinner service. Staff interviews and record reviews confirmed that meal trays were frequently served late, with several instances of meals being delivered thirty minutes or more past the scheduled time.
Surveyors found that kitchen staff stacked wet baking pans (wet nesting) and stored dishes, saucers, and coffee pots that were still dirty. A dietary staff member confirmed these issues during an interview. These unsanitary practices had the potential to affect a significant number of residents.
Grievance forms were not readily accessible to residents and could not be filed anonymously, as forms were kept at the nurses' station and required residents to request them from staff and submit them to the Social Worker's office. Facility leadership confirmed these limitations, resulting in a failure to ensure residents' rights to file grievances without reprisal or discrimination.
Staff responsible for admissions were unable to accurately explain the Binding Arbitration Agreement to residents or their representatives, including important details about the arbitration process and legal rights. Many residents or their representatives signed the agreement without a clear explanation, and staff admitted to lacking familiarity with the document.
The facility did not have a certified Infection Preventionist (IP) attend or participate in required QAA meetings, as the DON signed for both roles without evidence of IP certification or part-time work in that capacity. This failure meant not all required committee members were present, potentially affecting all residents.
Two residents were not served meals according to the prescribed menu, with one receiving a hot dog on sandwich bread without condiments and another receiving a hot dog on bread with cheese instead of a bun. Staff confirmed the deviations, and the ADON acknowledged the shortage of buns, indicating that menu requirements were not consistently met.
A lunch tray served to a resident was found to have food items, including buttered noodles and broccoli, at temperatures below the standard for safe and appetizing service. The issue was confirmed by the Regional Dietary Manager during a random check, with the potential to affect many residents.
Surveyors found that food items throughout the facility, including the kitchen, dining areas, dementia unit, and nourishment pantries, were not consistently labeled, dated, or properly sealed after opening. Drinks were left unlabeled and not on ice, and some food items were past their use-by dates. Staff confirmed these deficiencies, and food utensils were not stored according to policy.
A resident was discharged after the end of Medicare Part A skilled services without being provided the required Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form. Review of records and staff interview confirmed that the NOMNC was not issued prior to the end of covered services.
A resident who was unable to use her lower limbs was not permitted to use her personal wheelchair, despite being able to self-propel with her arms. Instead, she was placed in a Broda chair that she could not move independently, resulting in unnecessary restriction of her mobility. Therapy staff identified the need for a more suitable chair, but there was a significant delay in obtaining approval for the equipment, leaving the resident dependent on staff for movement.
A resident's care plan was not updated to reflect a new NPO (nothing by mouth) diet order, resulting in outdated interventions such as offering nutrition and allowing pureed snacks. The DON and a corporate RN confirmed the care plan did not match the resident's current dietary status.
A resident with multiple hospitalizations did not receive timely speech therapy screening or evaluation after readmission, as required by facility policy. Although OT and PT completed interdisciplinary screens, no ST recommendations were made, and the resident's care plan was not updated to reflect the current NPO order, resulting in conflicting documentation about oral intake. The DON confirmed the care plan was inaccurate and that the resident had not eaten.
A resident's medical record was incomplete because the required signature on the POST form was not obtained after verbal consent was given by the legal representative, and there was no documented follow-up by the facility to secure the written consent.
Staff did not follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions when providing catheter care to a resident with a Foley catheter. An LPN and a nursing assistant performed high-contact care activities, including perineal and catheter cleaning and changing briefs, while wearing only gloves and not the required gowns, despite posted EBP guidelines.
A bed remote control with exposed electrical wiring, covered with electrical tape, was identified in a resident's room. Staff and the Maintenance Director confirmed the issue, and the Administrator acknowledged the finding during the survey exit.
Surveyors found that the facility did not maintain comfortable temperatures in resident rooms and a common area, with temperatures recorded as low as 65-67°F. A resident was observed bundled in a blanket, and another reported feeling cold to an LPN, who provided a blanket in response.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions, including CHF and COPD, experienced significant weight gain, worsening edema, and shortness of breath over a two-week period. Despite repeated nursing documentation of these symptoms, the facility did not promptly notify the physician or obtain new orders to address the changes. The delay in medical intervention led to the resident's transfer and hospital admission for weight gain, edema, and CHF.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions experienced a delay in necessary medical treatment due to staff failing to recognize and report significant weight gain and +3 pitting edema, as well as not following a physician's order for an outside appointment. Despite ongoing symptoms and care plan instructions to report abnormal findings, the physician was not notified, and the resident was ultimately hospitalized for edema and CHF.
Multiple complaints and observations revealed that residents were served meals that were unpalatable, unattractive, and not at the correct temperature, with issues such as tough meat, overcooked eggs, missing menu items, and late meal service. Test trays and direct observation confirmed that food was not prepared according to recipes, and substitutions were made without proper planning, affecting all residents receiving nutrition from the kitchen.
The facility did not consistently serve meals at scheduled times, resulting in late meal delivery and food that was not palatable or at the correct temperature. Multiple residents and staff reported ongoing issues with meal timing and food quality, and no mealtimes were posted in the facility. The Administrator confirmed the inconsistency in meal service and acknowledged recent changes to meal cart schedules.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions experienced ongoing symptoms and had an order to visit her primary care physician, but the facility failed to assist with transportation, resulting in a canceled appointment. The resident's family attempted to arrange alternative transport, but was unsuccessful, leading to a 911 call and subsequent transfer to the ER. The DON stated the facility did not encourage outside PCP visits despite a physician's order, and the LPN was unaware of the order. This resulted in a failure to support the resident's right to self-determination.
Inconsistent Meal Service Times
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to serve meals at consistent times in accordance with residents' needs, preferences, and posted schedules. Record review showed that dinner service on the Memory Care unit was scheduled to begin at 5:00 PM, but observation revealed that residents became agitated and restless as dinner was not served until 5:21 PM, twenty-one minutes after the posted time. An interview with a Nurse Aide confirmed that meal service is often late and has been delayed even longer in the past. Further review of thirty-three trayline meal service records indicated that eight meals were served at least thirty minutes or more past the posted dinner time. These findings demonstrate a pattern of inconsistent meal service times, potentially affecting a minimal number of residents.
Unsanitary Storage and Cleaning of Kitchenware
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that kitchen staff failed to store baking pans in a sanitary manner by stacking them while still wet, a practice known as wet nesting. Additionally, plates, saucers, and coffee pots on the clean side were found to be dirty, indicating that dishes were not free from dried substances and were not stored clean. During an interview, a dietary staff member confirmed both the wet stacking of pans and the presence of dirty dishes, acknowledging the issues when pointed out. These practices were directly observed and confirmed, and had the potential to affect more than a minimal number of residents, with a facility census of 119 at the time of the survey. No specific residents or their medical histories were mentioned in the report, and the deficiency was based on direct observation and staff interview regarding food-contact surface sanitation in the kitchen.
Grievance Forms Not Readily Accessible or Anonymous
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents could fully exercise their right to file grievances, including the ability to file grievances anonymously. During an observation, it was found that grievance forms were not readily accessible to residents, as they were kept at the nurses' station rather than in a location easily accessible to all residents. Interviews with a resident and the Director of Social Services revealed that residents were aware of the grievance policy but needed to request a form from staff and submit it to the Social Worker's office, limiting anonymity. The Administrator and Regional Director of Clinical Operations confirmed that grievance forms were not readily available and could not be filed anonymously, indicating a lack of compliance with grievance policy requirements.
Failure to Clearly Explain Binding Arbitration Agreement
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately explain the Binding Arbitration Agreement to residents or their representatives in a manner they could understand. Record review showed that 81 residents or their representatives signed and accepted the agreement, while 15 declined. During interviews, both the Back-Up Admission Coordinator and the Admission Coordinator were unable to accurately explain key aspects of the agreement, such as the process for choosing arbitrators and whether residents could pursue issues in court after arbitration. The Admission Coordinator also admitted to not being familiar with the agreement and noted that residents typically do not ask questions about the form.
Certified Infection Preventionist Absent from QAA Meetings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a certified Infection Preventionist (IP) attended and participated in the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings as required. According to the facility's QAPI policy, the QAA committee must include the Executive Director, Director of Nursing (DON), Medical Director, Infection Preventionist, and three other staff members, with all members present at monthly meetings. Review of QAA meeting agendas and minutes for the quarter from October to December 2024 showed that the IP did not attend any of the meetings. Instead, the DON signed as both the DON and the IP, but the facility could not provide evidence that the DON was officially certified as an IP or working in that role beyond her regular duties as DON. During an interview, the Executive Director confirmed that the facility lacked documentation to verify the DON's certification as an IP and acknowledged that not all required members attended the QAPI meetings. This deficiency had the potential to affect all 108 residents residing in the facility, as the absence of a certified IP in QAA meetings could impact infection prevention oversight. No additional information was provided prior to the end of the survey.
Failure to Follow Prescribed Menus During Meal Service
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow prescribed menus for two residents during meal service. One resident was served a hot dog on a flat piece of sandwich bread without the required condiments, despite the tray card specifying an all-beef hot dog on a bun with mustard. A nursing assistant confirmed that the resident typically eats a hot dog daily and did not receive the correct bread or condiment. Another resident, who had ordered a hot dog, received it on a slice of bread with cheese instead of a bun and expressed dissatisfaction when informed by the aide that hot dog buns had run out. The Assistant Director of Nursing was present and acknowledged the lack of buns but did not provide further explanation at the time. These incidents were identified through record review, observation, and staff and resident interviews, demonstrating that the facility did not ensure menus were followed as required, potentially affecting more than a limited number of residents.
Failure to Serve Food at Appetizing and Safe Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food was served at an appetizing and safe temperature, as observed during a random check. On 07/07/2025 at 1:15 PM, the Regional Dietary Manager tested the temperature of a lunch tray that was the last to be served on D Hall. The tray had been on the hall since 1:05 PM. The measured temperatures were 125.1°F for bruschetta chicken, 112.0°F for buttered noodles, and 102.9°F for broccoli. The Regional Dietary Manager confirmed that the buttered noodles and broccoli were below the standard serving temperature. This deficiency had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents, with a facility census of 108 at the time of the survey.
Deficient Food Storage and Labeling Practices
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed multiple instances where food items were not stored according to professional standards and facility policy. In the main kitchen and dining areas, several opened food items, such as dry milk, tortillas, cereals, bread, ground turkey, deli ham, sauces, and dressings, were found without proper labeling, dating, or sealing. Additionally, pitchers of drinks in the dining room were not labeled, dated, or kept on ice. The employee refrigerator lacked a lock, and some food items were past their use-by dates. These findings were confirmed by dietary management staff. Further deficiencies were identified in the dementia unit's refrigerator/freezer and nourishment pantries. Opened ice cream, sandwiches, and beverages were not labeled or dated, and some sandwiches were not properly sealed. Snack baskets and other food items in the nourishment pantries were also found without open or use-by dates, and some items were not sealed. Food serving and preparation utensils were stored in drawers with handles not facing the same direction, contrary to facility policy. These issues were confirmed by nursing assistants and LPNs present during the survey.
Failure to Provide Required Medicare Non-Coverage Notice
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide the required Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form to a resident who was discharged following the end of their Medicare Part A skilled services. Record review showed that the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Discharge assessment was marked as planned, but there was no documentation that the NOMNC was issued prior to the termination of skilled services. During staff interview, the Social Worker Designee confirmed that the NOMNC was not given to the resident or their representative.
Failure to Ensure Resident Freedom from Unnecessary Physical Restraints
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident was not allowed to use her personal wheelchair, despite her expressed desire and ability to self-propel using her arms. The resident, who is unable to stand or use her lower limbs, reported that she had previously been mobile in her wheelchair before admission to the facility. Instead, she was provided with a Broda chair, which she could not move independently due to her inability to use her feet. Both the resident and her spouse questioned the restriction, as the resident was capable of upper body mobility. Review of the resident's medical records showed conflicting physician orders regarding her mobility and use of a wheelchair. Occupational therapy documentation indicated that the resident attempted to use a standard wheelchair but slid out of it, leading to recommendations for continued use of the Broda chair for safety. However, the Broda chair provided did not allow for independent movement, and the resident remained dependent on staff for mobility. The therapy team identified the need for a Broda chair with larger wheels that the resident could propel with her arms, and a requisition for this equipment was submitted, but not promptly authorized. The delay in obtaining appropriate seating equipment resulted in the resident being unnecessarily restricted in her movement for an extended period. The resident remained either in bed or in a Broda chair she could not move, despite her stated goal and ability to self-propel with her arms. The lack of timely action to provide suitable mobility equipment led to the use of a device that unnecessarily limited the resident's freedom of movement.
Failure to Update Care Plan Following Change to NPO Diet Status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to update a resident's care plan to accurately reflect a change in diet status. Medical record review showed that the resident had a current diet order of NPO (nothing by mouth) for diet type, texture, and consistency. However, the resident's care plan still included interventions such as providing a lid on hot beverages, offering nutrition and hydration during checks, and allowing caregivers or family to feed pureed foods as snacks. During staff interviews, the DON confirmed that the care plan was inaccurate and that the resident had not eaten anything, while a corporate RN acknowledged the care plan issue. This discrepancy between the resident's current NPO status and the interventions listed in the care plan demonstrates a failure to update the care plan following a significant change in the resident's dietary needs.
Failure to Provide Timely and Accurate Rehabilitative Services and Care Plan Updates
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide patient-centered rehabilitative services for a resident who had experienced multiple hospitalizations and was readmitted to the facility. Despite the facility's policy requiring interdisciplinary screening for all therapy disciplines upon admission or readmission, speech therapy (ST) was not initiated or screened during the resident's stay or after changes in condition following hospitalization. The Director of Rehabilitation Services indicated that ST was only identified if requested by nursing or other therapies, and noted that speech therapy staff had not been available for some time. Although occupational therapy (OT) and physical therapy (PT) completed interdisciplinary screens, no ST recommendations were made, and the required screening process was not followed as per facility policy. A speech therapy evaluation was eventually completed, resulting in a recommendation for the resident to remain NPO (nothing by mouth), with specific instructions for pleasure feeding and safe swallowing practices. However, the resident's care plan was not updated to reflect the current NPO order and continued to document oral intake with pureed foods, which conflicted with the most recent recommendations. The Director of Nursing confirmed the care plan was inaccurate and that the resident had not consumed any food. No instrumental swallowing studies were completed, and the lack of timely and accurate therapy screening and care plan updates led to the deficiency.
Incomplete POST Form Due to Missing Signature
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a complete medical record for one resident by not obtaining a required signature on the Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form. Although verbal consent was provided by the resident's legal representative on 04/16/2025, there was no signed consent documented in the medical record. Additionally, there was no evidence that the facility attempted to follow up with the legal representative to secure the necessary written signature, as required by accepted professional standards.
Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Catheter Care
Penalty
Summary
Staff failed to adhere to infection control protocols while providing care to a resident under Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The resident, who had a Foley catheter due to bladder incontinence and was alert with a BIMS score of 8, was observed receiving catheter care from an LPN and a nursing assistant. Despite clear signage outside the resident's room specifying that gloves and gowns must be worn for high-contact care activities, including catheter care and changing briefs, both staff members only donned gloves and did not wear gowns during the procedure. During the observed care, the staff entered the room, pulled the privacy curtain, and proceeded to remove the resident's brief, clean the perineum and catheter, and apply a new brief, all without donning gowns or changing gloves. The soiled linens were disposed of appropriately, but the required PPE protocol was not followed. The unit manager confirmed that EBP protocols were not adhered to during this episode of care.
Failure to Maintain Safe Bed Remote Controls
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain bed remote controls in a safe operating condition for one of five resident beds reviewed. During an interview, an employee confirmed awareness of an issue with a bed remote that had exposed electrical wiring, specifically referencing a bed in room [ROOM NUMBER]B. Subsequent observation by the surveyor revealed electrical tape on the bed control remote for bed 123B. The Maintenance Director later verified the presence of electrical tape on the remote, and this finding was acknowledged by the Administrator during the survey exit. No information was provided regarding the medical history or condition of the resident occupying the affected bed at the time of the deficiency.
Failure to Maintain Comfortable Room Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that the facility failed to maintain resident rooms and common areas at a comfortable temperature, as required for a safe and homelike environment. During a walk-through of the locked Alzheimer's unit, one resident was found tightly bundled in a blanket on his bed, with the room's P-tac unit set to 67 degrees Fahrenheit. Another room's P-tac unit was set to 65 degrees Fahrenheit. Ambient air temperature checks confirmed that one resident room and the TV room were both at 67 degrees Fahrenheit, while another resident room was at 72 degrees Fahrenheit. Additionally, a resident was observed expressing feeling cold to an LPN, who responded by offering a blanket. These findings indicate that the facility did not ensure consistent and comfortable room temperatures for residents, as evidenced by both direct observations and resident complaints.
Delayed Physician Notification and Treatment for Resident with CHF and Edema
Penalty
Summary
A resident with a complex medical history, including dementia, major depressive disorder, COPD, congestive heart failure (CHF), seizures, and hypertension, experienced a significant weight gain of over 12 pounds in two months, progressive lower extremity edema (+3 pitting), and ongoing complaints of shortness of breath. Despite these changes, the facility failed to notify the physician of the resident's weight gain and edema in a timely manner, and did not obtain new physician orders to address these symptoms. Nursing documentation showed repeated observations of edema and pain, but there was no evidence that these findings were escalated to the medical provider until the resident's condition worsened. Nursing notes indicated that the resident was experiencing pain, swelling, and difficulty with mobility, and was refusing showers due to discomfort. The nurse practitioner (NP) evaluated the resident for pain and cellulitis, but did not document or address the previously noted +3 pitting edema. The care plan included instructions to monitor for and report symptoms such as edema and dyspnea, but these were not consistently communicated to the physician as required. The resident continued to experience symptoms, including shortness of breath and increased swelling, over a period of two weeks. Eventually, after further complaints of shortness of breath and continued weight gain, the NP ordered additional assessments and increased diuretic therapy. However, delays in addressing the resident's symptoms and failure to promptly notify the physician contributed to the resident being transferred to the hospital, where she was admitted with a diagnosis of weight gain, edema, and CHF. The deficiency centers on the facility's delay in providing necessary medical treatment and failing to follow established protocols for physician notification and intervention.
Delayed Clinical Assessment and Failure to Notify Physician Leads to Hospitalization
Penalty
Summary
A resident with a complex medical history, including dementia, major depressive disorder, COPD, congestive heart failure (CHF), seizures, and hypertension, experienced a delay in necessary medical treatment due to insufficient ongoing clinical assessment and failure to identify changes in condition by facility staff. Nursing documentation noted significant +3 pitting edema in the resident's lower extremities, as well as a weight gain of over 12 pounds within two months. Despite these findings, there was no evidence that the physician was notified of the weight gain or the edema, nor were appropriate orders obtained to address these changes. The nurse practitioner (NP) examined the resident and documented symptoms of cellulitis, including redness, warmth, and weeping skin on both lower extremities, and prescribed antibiotics. However, the NP did not address the previously documented +3 pitting edema or the resident's significant weight gain. Subsequent nursing notes indicated ongoing edema, redness, and resident complaints of shortness of breath, but staff continued to report that vital signs were within normal limits and did not escalate the situation appropriately. The care plan included instructions to observe for and report edema and other symptoms, but there was no documentation that abnormal findings were reported to the medical provider as required. Additionally, a physician's order for the resident to attend an appointment with her primary care physician was not followed, as transportation was not arranged and staff were unaware of the order. The resident ultimately required hospital admission for weight gain, edema, and CHF. The facility's failure to recognize and act upon significant changes in the resident's condition, notify the physician, and follow physician orders contributed to the delay in necessary medical treatment.
Failure to Provide Palatable and Appetizing Meals
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide palatable, attractive, and appetizing food to residents, as evidenced by multiple complaints and observations. Resident Council minutes from several months documented concerns such as tough meat, incorrect preparation of eggs, lack of substitutions, meals not matching the menu, and food being served late. Grievance forms further detailed issues with food quality, including roast beef that was too hard to chew and overcooked meat, fish, and eggs. Residents also reported that posted meal times were not adhered to, resulting in late meals. Direct observation and test tray reviews confirmed these deficiencies. On one occasion, the menu listed Salisbury steak, glazed carrots, egg noodles, and a buttered roll, but the carrots lacked glaze, the egg noodles were mushy and unappetizing, and no rolls were provided. Additionally, mashed potatoes were served in place of egg noodles due to insufficient preparation, and the kitchen staff did not follow the recipe for the noodles, steaming them instead of boiling. The Administrator acknowledged these issues, confirming that the kitchen did not prepare enough food items and failed to follow recipes.
Failure to Provide Timely and Palatable Meals
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide meals and snacks at scheduled times in accordance with residents' needs and preferences, resulting in meals being served late and food not being palatable or at the appropriate temperature. Resident Council minutes documented repeated complaints about late meals, cold potatoes, and flat rolls, with residents being told that meals would be late for various reasons and encouraged to ask for snacks. Grievance forms also noted that meals were usually late and that meat, fish, and eggs were overcooked and tough. Staff interviews confirmed concerns about the lateness and inconsistency of mealtimes, and observations revealed that mealtimes were not posted in the facility. The Administrator acknowledged issues with meal timing and confirmed that mealtimes were not posted, with recent changes to meal cart schedules contributing to the inconsistency.
Failure to Facilitate Resident Transportation for PCP Visit
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination by not assisting a resident with transportation to her primary care physician (PCP), despite a physician's order for the visit. The resident, who had multiple diagnoses including seizures, dementia, major depressive disorder, congestive heart failure, COPD, hypertension, hypothyroidism, and hyperlipidemia, experienced ongoing symptoms such as shortness of breath, pain, and significant lower extremity edema. Progress notes documented repeated assessments and interventions by nursing staff and a nurse practitioner, including treatment for cellulitis and management of pain and respiratory symptoms. On the day of the scheduled PCP appointment, transportation was canceled, and the resident was unable to attend. The resident's sister attempted to arrange alternative transportation, but the resident was unable to get into a personal vehicle, leading the sister to call 911. The resident expressed a desire to go to the emergency room for evaluation of her symptoms, and the facility's nurse practitioner subsequently ordered a transfer to the ER. Prior to this, the facility's DON stated that the facility did not encourage outside PCP visits because their own medical staff could address resident needs, despite an existing order from the facility's medical director for the resident to see her PCP. Further review revealed that the LPN responsible for arranging transportation was unaware of the physician's order for the PCP visit. Ultimately, the resident was admitted to the hospital with diagnoses including weight gain, edema, and congestive heart failure. The failure to assist with transportation and facilitate the resident's choice to see her PCP constituted a lack of support for resident self-determination.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 230 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 4 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Parkersburg
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Worthington Healthcare Center | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Willows Center | 2.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 31 | 0 |
| Belpre Landing Nursing And Rehabilitation | 3.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
| Parkersburg Center | 3.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 34 | 1 |
| Rockland Ridge Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 4.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Eagle Pointe Healthcare Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.