Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Rockland Ridge Nursing & Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with multiple diagnoses, including a recent L knee replacement and surgical incision with 43 staples, was observed sitting in a recliner with the call light left on the bed and out of reach. The resident stated the call light was over on the bed, and an RN confirmed the cord was lying across the bed and not within reach.
Inaccurate Pressure Ulcer Assessment and Delayed Wound Treatment: A resident with a stage III pressure ulcer, diabetes, venous insufficiency, and heart failure had coccyx and left buttocks wounds that were not comprehensively assessed in the facility record. The facility’s wound note documented measurements and wound status that did not match the visiting wound NP’s assessment, and ordered collagen-based treatment for the coccyx was not reflected in the MAR/TAR. Staff later confirmed the documentation mismatch and that the collagen product had not been ordered when expected.
Infection control practices were not followed during wound care, perineal care, and catheter management. A nurse used contaminated gloves to clean a resident’s wound area after stool care, a CNA washed a female resident from rectum to vagina during incontinence care, and a resident’s suprapubic catheter bag was observed touching and dragging on the floor while the resident was in a wheelchair. The DON confirmed the catheter bag should not touch the floor.
Call Light Left Out of Resident’s Reach
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was maintained within reach. Resident #78 was admitted with diagnoses including left knee replacement, osteoarthritis of the left knee, diabetes, left foot drop, lumbar sacral plexus disorder, hypertension, anxiety disorder, varicose veins of the lower extremities, radiculopathy, sacrococcygeal disorders, hip trochanteric bursitis, low back pain, thoracic spine pain, sciatica, Raynaud's syndrome, spinal stenosis, pacemaker, and anemia. The admission note documented a surgical incision to the left knee with 43 staples and that the resident required three staff assistance for transfer to bed. During observation, the resident was sitting up in a recliner with feet elevated and stated her call light was over on the bed; the call light cord was observed lying across the bed and out of reach. An RN later confirmed the call light was lying across the bed and out of the resident's reach.
Inaccurate Pressure Ulcer Assessment and Delayed Wound Treatment
Penalty
Summary
A resident with diagnoses including a stage III pressure ulcer, diabetes, venous insufficiency, and heart failure had pressure injuries to the coccyx and left buttocks. The resident’s care plan called for weekly and as-needed assessment of the areas for size, color, drainage, and pain, along with ordered treatments. However, review of the resident’s progress notes and assessments showed no evidence of a comprehensive assessment of the pressure ulcer on the left buttocks or coccyx during the reviewed period. The resident was followed weekly by a visiting wound NP. On one follow-up, the coccyx stage III pressure injury and the left buttocks wound were documented with measurements and continued Xeroform and foam dressing orders. On the next follow-up, the coccyx wound was documented as larger and the treatment plan was changed, while the left buttocks was documented as healed and the left shin skin tear was also addressed. The facility’s own progress note for the same date documented different wound descriptions and measurements, including the coccyx as stage II and the left buttocks as a clustered wound, which did not match the visiting wound NP’s assessment. Review of the orders and treatment administration records showed no evidence the resident was ordered or received collagen gauze daily to the coccyx after the wound plan changed. The visiting wound NP later added an amendment stating collagen with silver was ordered but unavailable, and the prior Xeroform order would continue until the product was available. Facility staff reported the collagen had not been ordered when expected, and the DON confirmed the resident’s wound documentation on the facility note was inaccurate and did not match the NP’s comprehensive assessment or orders.
Infection Control Failures During Wound Care, Perineal Care, and Catheter Bag Placement
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices were followed during wound care for a resident with multiple pressure ulcers. Resident #23 was admitted with diagnoses including staphylococcal arthritis of the right hip, infection and inflammatory reaction due to an internal right hip prosthesis, and weakness and gait abnormalities. Her admission skin record showed unstageable pressure ulcers to the sacrum, left proximal buttock, and left distal buttock, and she was known to be frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. During observed treatment of the stage III pressure ulcer on the left distal buttock, the nurse provided incontinence care after the resident had a bowel movement and then used the same contaminated gloves to wipe dried Triad paste from the buttock area over the wound site before removing the gloves and performing hand hygiene. The nurse later confirmed she did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene between cleaning the stool and wiping the wound area. The facility also failed to ensure proper perineal care was provided during incontinence care. Resident #3 had diagnoses including right side hemiplegia, aphasia, apraxia, diabetes, cerebral infarction, dysfunction of the bladder, and other chronic conditions. During observed incontinence care, a CNA provided care to the labial area without concern, but when the resident was rolled to provide care to the rectum and buttocks, the CNA washed and rinsed from the rectum to the vaginal area. The CNA later confirmed she washed and rinsed from the rectum to the vagina. The facility policy for perineal care stated females are to always be wiped front to back using a different part of the washcloth for each wipe. The facility further failed to maintain a resident’s indwelling urinary catheter collection bag off the floor. Resident #5 had diagnoses including urinary retention, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and a suprapubic catheter, and a recent urine culture showed Enterobacter cloacae complex, MRSA, and VRE. During observation, the catheter bag was directly touching the floor while the resident sat in a wheelchair, and later the bag was seen dragging on the floor as the resident was pushed down the hall. The CNA confirmed the bag was touching the floor and moved it after being told. The DON confirmed catheter bags should not be directly touching the floor and stated the facility had recently educated staff on catheter care, although the policy did not include placement of the catheter bag.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 148 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Belpre
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belpre Landing Nursing And Rehabilitation | 0.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
| Willows Center | 3 mi | ★★★★★ | 31 | 0 |
| Eagle Pointe Healthcare Center | 4.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Parkersburg Center | 4.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 34 | 1 |
| Worthington Healthcare Center | 5.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Rockland Ridge Nursing & Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 2026) and official state health department websites.