Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Pelican Health Randolph Llc during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Surveyors found that PTAC units in several rooms were not properly aligned or sealed, resulting in visible gaps to the outside and crumbled insulation. In one room, water leakage from a misaligned unit led to wet, soiled linens beneath it. Maintenance staff had recently reinstalled the units after electrical work but failed to secure them correctly, and facility leadership was unaware of the issue until the survey.
A deficiency was identified due to the absence of a pest control program to prevent or manage mice, insects, or other pests within the facility.
A resident with quadriplegia, who was cognitively intact and fully dependent on staff for care, was repeatedly left without access to a call light device. Staff failed to provide the call button after care tasks, leaving the resident unable to call for assistance until prompted by a surveyor or after calling out for help. Staff interviews confirmed the omission was due to distraction or workload, and leadership stated that staff were expected to ensure call light accessibility.
The facility failed to protect residents from all forms of abuse and neglect, including physical, mental, and sexual abuse, as well as physical punishment, by any individual.
A nurse aide observed a male resident fondling a female resident and reported the incident to the Administrator, who then notified the State Agency and local law enforcement but failed to notify APS as required by facility policy. The Administrator later stated she was unaware of the need to report the allegation to APS.
A resident who completed long-term antibiotic treatment and was discharged home did not have a transfer or discharge notice issued, and the Ombudsman was not notified in writing of the discharge. Staff interviews revealed that the Social Worker responsible for notifications was unaware of the requirement, and the Ombudsman had not received discharge lists for several months.
A resident with bilateral leg ulcers did not receive wound care as ordered by the physician, as the nurse only cleansed open areas and not the entire lower legs before applying unna boots. Another resident, who was dependent and had a feeding tube, missed a scheduled GI appointment because transportation was not arranged, with unclear responsibility among staff for EMS scheduling. These deficiencies were identified through direct observation, record review, and staff interviews.
A resident did not receive treatment and care in accordance with physician orders and their own preferences and goals, as observed by surveyors.
Two residents with significant medical conditions, including diabetes and vascular disease, did not receive necessary foot assessments or toenail care. Their toenails became long, thick, and untrimmed, with staff acknowledging the need for podiatry intervention. Due to lapses in scheduling and lack of staff awareness, neither resident was seen by a podiatrist, and their foot care needs were not addressed.
Two residents with quadriplegia experienced unsafe mechanical lift transfers when staff failed to follow facility policy and manufacturer guidelines. In one case, a resident was injured after a single aide attempted a transfer alone and the lift struck the resident's forehead. In another case, two aides did not widen or lock the base of the lift during a transfer, causing equipment entanglement. Both incidents involved staff not following required procedures for safe resident handling.
Surveyors found that appropriate care was not consistently provided to residents who were continent or incontinent of bowel and bladder, including improper catheter care and insufficient measures to prevent UTIs.
A resident who was dependent on enteral nutrition via a gastrostomy tube did not have their tube feeding setup properly labeled according to facility policy. Observations showed that the feeding bag was missing key information such as the resident's name, type of feeding solution, additives, nurse preparer, and infusion rate, despite staff acknowledging these requirements.
A resident with chronic respiratory failure and severe cognitive impairment did not receive oxygen at the physician-ordered rate of 2 LPM via nasal cannula. Over several days, the oxygen concentrator was observed set at 1 LPM, and nursing staff did not verify the correct flow rate during their assessments, despite clear orders and care plan interventions.
Staff failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions and infection control policies when a nurse did not wear a gown during gastrostomy tube medication administration, a nurse aide did not don a gown for urinary catheter care, and a wound nurse did not perform proper hand hygiene or use gloves while preparing wound care supplies for two residents with indwelling devices. PPE was not readily accessible, and EBP signage was not clearly visible, contributing to the deficiencies.
A resident requiring assistance with ADLs was unable to reliably alert staff due to a malfunctioning call light system that failed to produce an audible alarm and lacked a manual hand bell. Staff and maintenance confirmed ongoing issues with the system, resulting in reliance on regular rounding rather than immediate response to call lights.
A resident with major depressive and anxiety disorders was prescribed PRN Haloperidol without a required 14-day stop date, and no AIMS assessment was conducted to monitor for side effects. Staff interviews revealed misunderstandings about the necessity of stop dates for hospice patients, and pharmacy recommendations for medication management were not followed.
A resident with peripheral vascular disease and a recent angioplasty did not receive the prescribed antiplatelet medication, Plavix, due to a failure in the facility's order entry and verification process. Nurse #2 misunderstood the medication order, and the second nurse check was not effectively performed, leading to the omission of Plavix from the resident's medication administration record. The error was identified by the facility's administration, and the Medical Director confirmed it as a significant medication error.
The facility failed to maintain accurate advanced directives for two residents, resulting in discrepancies between their care plans and medical orders. One resident's care plan incorrectly listed them as Full Code despite a DNR order, while another resident's care plan was not updated to reflect a change to DNR status. The Social Services Director acknowledged the errors, highlighting a failure in the facility's process for updating and maintaining consistent documentation.
A resident in an LTC facility experienced a 7.41% medication error rate due to two errors. The first involved nearly crushing Nifedipine ER tablets, which should not be crushed, risking improper medication release. The second error was administering incorrect eye drops, as the nurse used a different type without verifying with the physician. Interviews revealed a lack of awareness and communication among staff regarding these errors.
A facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with a chronic ulcer, as required by their infection control policy. Observations showed the absence of PPE supplies and EBP signage, and the Wound Care Nurse did not wear a gown during wound care. Interviews revealed a lack of awareness and process for ensuring EBP for residents with wounds.
A facility failed to keep a urinary catheter drainage bag off the floor for a resident with a history of obstructive uropathy and chronic kidney disease. Despite recent in-service training, staff did not properly secure the bag, leading to it dragging on the floor and increasing the risk of infection.
The facility failed to post nurse staffing data at the beginning of each shift for two consecutive days. The Scheduler, responsible for posting the data, typically arrived after the first shift started and posted the data only once daily. During her absence, there was a lack of clarity and communication among staff regarding who should post the data, leading to the deficiency.
A resident with neuralgia and neuritis was assessed and approved by the IDT to self-administer pain relief creams, but this approval was not reflected in the care plan. The ADON completed the assessment and educated the resident but did not update the care plan. Interviews revealed confusion among staff about the responsibility for updating the care plan, with the MDS Nurse still in training and the DON acknowledging the omission. The NP confirmed the resident's competence and the need for a care plan, while the Administrator stated that only an IDT assessment was required.
A transporter failed to call EMS or have a resident assessed by a medical professional after the resident's wheelchair tipped over in a transportation van, causing him to hit his head. Despite being on Plavix, the transporter moved the resident back into a sitting position and transported him back to the facility without calling EMS. The facility's policy required calling EMS in such incidents, but the transporter did not follow this procedure.
A resident's wheelchair tipped over in a transport van due to improper securement, causing the resident to hit his head. The transporter failed to follow the manufacturer's instructions for securing the wheelchair, leading to the incident. The resident, who was on blood-thinning medication, experienced head pain and nausea and was sent to the hospital for evaluation.
A resident was observed with a medication cup at their bedside, which they took without a physician's order or care plan for self-administration. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had multiple diagnoses, insisted on taking the medications after breakfast. Nurse #1 left the medications at the bedside, believing it was acceptable due to the resident's alert state. However, the facility's DON and other staff confirmed that medications should not be left at the bedside without an assessment for self-administration.
Failure to Properly Seal and Install PTAC Units in Resident Rooms
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that the facility failed to properly install and seal packaged terminal air conditioners (PTACs) in four out of eight resident rooms reviewed across three of four halls. In multiple rooms, the PTAC units were not aligned with the wall, resulting in gaps ranging from one to two inches at the top of the units. These gaps allowed daylight from the exterior to be visible from inside the rooms, and the insulation present was found to be crumbled or in poor condition. In one room, wet, soiled towels and sheets with brown stains were found underneath the PTAC unit, which was leaning inward and not sealed to the wall. During a facility tour with the Maintenance Director, Regional Maintenance Director, and the Administrator, it was confirmed that the PTAC units remained improperly installed and the gaps persisted. The maintenance staff indicated that the PTAC units had been removed and reinstalled recently to replace electrical cords, but only the middle screws were secured during reinstallation, leaving the units misaligned. The facility leadership was not previously aware of these issues until the surveyors' observations.
Lack of Pest Control Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not have a pest control program in place to prevent or address the presence of mice, insects, or other pests. This deficiency was identified based on the lack of measures or systems to manage and control pests within the facility environment.
Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility for Dependent Resident
Penalty
Summary
Staff failed to ensure that a dependent resident with quadriplegia consistently had access to a call light device. The resident, who was cognitively intact but unable to use upper or lower extremities, required maximum assistance for all activities of daily living. During an observation, a nurse aide completed catheter care and began to leave the room without providing the resident with the call button. When prompted by the surveyor, the aide retrieved the call button and placed it by the resident's head, allowing him to activate it using the right side of his head. The aide admitted to forgetting to provide the call button due to being distracted by the care task. Later, the resident was heard calling for help from his room, and the call button was found hanging off the side of the bed, out of reach. Another nurse aide entered, assisted the resident, and confirmed the call button was accessible. Interviews with the resident revealed that staff often did not provide the call button, and staff interviews confirmed that the omission was due to being busy or distracted. Both the DON and the Administrator stated that staff were expected to ensure residents had access to call bells before leaving the room.
Failure to Protect Residents from Abuse and Neglect
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified regarding the facility's failure to protect each resident from all types of abuse, including physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by any individual. The report notes that residents were not adequately safeguarded from these forms of mistreatment, indicating lapses in the facility's responsibility to ensure resident safety and well-being. No specific details about the residents involved, their medical history, or their condition at the time of the deficiency are provided in the report.
Failure to Report Resident-to-Resident Sexual Abuse to APS
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of resident-to-resident sexual abuse to Adult Protective Services (APS) as required by its abuse policy. A nurse aide observed a male resident fondling a female resident in the hallway and reported the incident to the Administrator. The State Agency and local law enforcement were notified within hours of the incident, but the Department of Social Services/APS was not notified. The Administrator later stated in an interview that she was unaware of the requirement to report such allegations to APS. Documentation confirmed that the incident was not reported to APS, despite the facility's policy mandating immediate reporting of all alleged violations involving abuse.
Failure to Notify Ombudsman of Resident Discharge
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide written notification to the Ombudsman regarding the discharge of a resident who had been admitted for long-term antibiotic treatment and was discharged home after completing the treatment. Review of the resident's electronic medical record showed that no transfer or discharge notice was issued to the resident. Staff interviews revealed that the Ombudsman had not received any transfer or discharge lists from the facility for several months and was not aware of this resident's discharge. Further interviews indicated that the former Social Worker, who was in training during the relevant period, did not send notifications of transfers or discharges to the Ombudsman and was unaware of this requirement. The Administrator stated that the facility did not have a Social Worker at the time of the survey and expected that communication with the Ombudsman regarding transfers and discharges would occur. The former DON confirmed that the Social Worker was responsible for this communication, but it was not completed for this resident.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Wound Care and Arrange Medical Appointment Transportation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide wound care to a resident with bilateral arterial and venous ulcers according to physician orders. The resident, who was cognitively intact and required assistance with most activities of daily living, had physician orders for bilateral unna boots to be applied from toes to knees, with wound cleanser to be used on both lower legs before application. During an observed wound care session, the Wound Nurse only cleansed the open ulcer areas and did not cleanse the entire lower legs, including areas with dry skin, before applying the unna boots. The Wound Nurse stated she was unfamiliar with the resident's wound care and believed the order was unclear, but did not seek clarification from the physician. Both the DON and Administrator confirmed that the expectation was for the nurse to follow the physician's order and to clarify any uncertainties before proceeding. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure transportation was arranged for a resident to attend a scheduled gastroenterology appointment. The resident, who was severely cognitively impaired, dependent for all care, and had a feeding tube, had a physician's order for a GI consultation. The appointment was documented in the facility's appointment book, but the resident did not attend, and no transportation was arranged. The Transportation Scheduler reported that he did not schedule EMS transportation and was unsure who was responsible for doing so. The Social Worker, who was responsible for making appointments, was unavailable for interview, and the former ADON did not recall why transportation was not arranged. The Administrator stated that the expectation was for transportation to be scheduled so residents would not miss appointments. These deficiencies were identified through observations, record reviews, and interviews with staff and family members. The failures included not following physician orders for wound care and not ensuring necessary transportation for a medical appointment, both of which were directly observed or confirmed by staff and documentation.
Failure to Follow Treatment Orders and Resident Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and care according to physician orders, as well as the resident's preferences and goals. This deficiency was identified through surveyor observation and review of care practices, which revealed that care provided did not align with the established orders or the expressed wishes and objectives of the resident. Specific details regarding the resident's medical history or condition at the time of the deficiency are not provided in the report.
Failure to Provide Timely Foot Care and Podiatry Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to assess and provide appropriate foot care for two residents, both of whom had significant medical conditions that increased their risk for foot complications. One resident had a history of cerebral infarction with hemiplegia and diabetes mellitus, was severely cognitively impaired, and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. The other resident had polyosteoarthritis, peripheral vascular and arterial disease, muscle weakness, and required assistance with personal hygiene. Despite these needs, neither resident received regular foot assessments to determine if nail care was needed, nor were their toenails trimmed as required. Observations revealed that both residents had long, thick toenails with crusty material underneath, and their toenails extended significantly beyond the tips of their toes. Nursing staff acknowledged that the toenails were too long and thick to be managed by nursing staff and that podiatry intervention was necessary, especially for the diabetic resident. However, neither resident was scheduled for or seen by the podiatrist during the facility's podiatry clinics, and there were no records of podiatry consultations in their medical records. Interviews with facility staff, including the DON and NP, indicated a lack of awareness regarding the residents' need for podiatry services. The DON explained that the absence of a social worker, who was responsible for scheduling podiatry appointments, may have contributed to residents not being placed on the podiatry schedule. The facility held podiatry clinics every three months, but the process for ensuring residents in need were seen was not maintained, resulting in unmet foot care needs for these residents.
Failure to Ensure Safe Mechanical Lift Transfers and Adherence to Manufacturer Guidelines
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide safe mechanical lift transfers for residents dependent on such equipment, resulting in accident hazards and inadequate supervision. In one incident, a resident with quadriplegia, a history of traumatic brain injury, and chronic respiratory failure required a mechanical lift for all transfers. During a transfer, a nursing aide attempted to use the mechanical lift alone, despite facility policy and the resident's care plan requiring two staff members. The aide proceeded without assistance, and the lift's battery failed during the transfer. While attempting to maneuver the resident, the lift swung and struck the resident's forehead, causing a hematoma. The resident was subsequently lowered to the floor and transported to the hospital for evaluation. Interviews and witness statements confirmed that only one staff member was present during the transfer, and the aide had asked another staff member to falsely state she was present. In a separate incident, staff failed to follow the manufacturer's guidelines for the use of a mechanical lift during a transfer of another resident with quadriplegia. Observations revealed that two aides transferred the resident from a wheelchair to a bed without widening or locking the base of the mechanical lift, as required by the manufacturer's instructions. The lift was pushed tightly around the wheelchair, causing it to become stuck, and the unit manager had to maneuver the wheelchair to release it. Interviews with the involved staff confirmed that they did not ensure the base was widened or the wheels locked during the transfer, despite being aware of the correct procedure. Both incidents demonstrate a failure to adhere to facility policy and manufacturer guidelines for mechanical lift use, resulting in unsafe transfer practices. The deficiencies were identified through observation, record review, and interviews with residents and staff, affecting two of three residents reviewed for accident hazards, supervision, and device use.
Deficient Bowel/Bladder and Catheter Care Leading to UTI Risk
Penalty
Summary
The report identifies a deficiency related to the provision of care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel and bladder, as well as the management of catheter care and the prevention of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Surveyors found that appropriate care was not consistently provided to residents in these areas. Specific failures included inadequate attention to the needs of residents with incontinence, improper catheter care practices, and insufficient measures to prevent UTIs. These lapses were observed during the survey and were directly related to the care provided to residents requiring assistance with bowel and bladder management.
Failure to Properly Label Enteral Feeding Setup
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow proper procedures for labeling a continuous gastrostomy tube feeding for one resident who was dependent on enteral nutrition. The resident, who had chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes mellitus, and was unable to eat by mouth, received all nutrition through a gastrostomy tube. Physician orders specified that the enteral feeding pump tubing, solution, and piston syringe should be changed nightly, and that the feeding should be administered continuously at a specified rate. The resident's care plan included interventions such as elevating the head of the bed and monitoring for complications related to tube feeding. During multiple observations, the enteral feeding bag was found to be inadequately labeled, missing required information such as the resident's name, type of feeding solution, additives, the name of the nurse who prepared the feeding, and the rate and method of infusion. Staff interviews confirmed that the facility's policy required this information to be included on the label, but it was not consistently done. The DON and NP both acknowledged the importance of proper labeling and confirmed that the observed practice did not meet facility expectations.
Failure to Administer Oxygen at Prescribed Rate
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with chronic respiratory failure and hypoxia, who was dependent for all activities of daily living and had severely impaired cognitive skills, did not receive oxygen at the physician-ordered rate. The resident was admitted with orders for continuous oxygen at 2 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula. Multiple observations over four consecutive days revealed that the oxygen concentrator was set at 1 LPM instead of the prescribed 2 LPM, despite the resident's care plan and physician's orders specifying the correct rate. Interviews with nursing staff and the DON confirmed that the oxygen flow rate was not checked as required during initial assessments, and the staff member responsible for the resident during the observed period did not recall verifying the flow rate on any of those days. The DON and Administrator both stated that staff are expected to follow physician orders for oxygen administration, and the NP confirmed that an active order specifying the flow rate must be followed. The failure to ensure the resident received oxygen at the prescribed rate was directly observed and acknowledged by facility staff.
Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions and Infection Control Policies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and infection control policies during the care of residents with indwelling medical devices. Nurse #2 did not wear a gown while administering medications via a gastrostomy tube to a resident, despite an EBP sign being posted above the resident's bed. There was also no personal protective equipment (PPE) available in or outside the resident's room. Nurse #2 stated she did not see the EBP sign and was unaware that gown use was required for feeding tube care. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that EBP signage had been moved from doors to above beds and that PPE had been relocated to storage rooms, making it less accessible to staff. Similarly, a nurse aide failed to don a gown while providing urinary catheter care to another resident, with no PPE available in or outside the room and the EBP sign placed behind the resident's bed. The nurse aide admitted to forgetting to wear a gown and typically obtained PPE from central supply before care. The DON and Administrator both acknowledged that the EBP policy required gown use for such care activities and expected staff to comply with infection control regulations. Additionally, the Wound Nurse did not follow hand hygiene or clean dressing policies while preparing and administering wound care. The nurse prepared wound supplies after sanitizing her hands but then touched unclean surfaces and handled wound care materials with ungloved hands, failing to sanitize again before proceeding. The supplies were placed on an unclean overbed table, and the nurse used her bare fingers to prepare gauze for wound cleansing. The DON and Administrator both confirmed that the Wound Nurse should have sanitized her hands and worn gloves during these steps, in accordance with facility policy.
Deficient Call Light System Fails to Alert Staff for Resident Needing Assistance
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when the facility failed to ensure that the call light system was functioning properly for a resident who required assistance with activities of daily living. The resident, who had a history of cerebral infarction, hypertensive heart disease, and dysphagia, was cognitively intact and needed partial assistance with transfers and toileting. During an observation, it was found that while the call light at the bedside would illuminate the light above the room entry door and the communication panel at the nurse's station, no audible alarm sounded. Additionally, there was no manual hand bell available for the resident to use to call for assistance. Interviews with staff revealed that the call bell system had not been working correctly for some time, with issues such as the alarm not sounding and lights not functioning in certain rooms. Staff reported that, due to these ongoing issues, they relied on rounding every two hours to check on residents. The resident confirmed he could engage the call light but did not hear a noise and sometimes experienced delays in staff response. Maintenance and administrative staff acknowledged the persistent problems with the call bell system and indicated that the issue was known and under review.
Failure to Implement PRN Antipsychotic Stop Dates and AIMS Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to regulations regarding the use of PRN antipsychotic medications, specifically Haloperidol, for a resident diagnosed with major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. The resident, who was cognitively impaired and exhibited behaviors such as hallucinations, had an active physician order for Haloperidol without a stop date, contrary to the requirement that PRN antipsychotic medications must have a 14-day stop date. Interviews with staff, including a nurse and the hospice nurse, revealed a misunderstanding of the requirement for a stop date, with the hospice nurse indicating that the facility had not requested stop dates for PRN antipsychotic medications. Additionally, the facility did not conduct an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessment for the resident, which is necessary to monitor for side effects associated with antipsychotic drug therapy. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that an AIMS assessment should have been completed when the resident was started on Haloperidol and then every three months thereafter. However, the assessment was missed, and the Director of Nursing was unsure who was responsible for completing it. The Consultant Pharmacist had made recommendations, including the need for a 14-day limit on PRN antipsychotic orders and the completion of an AIMS assessment, but these recommendations had not been acted upon by the facility. The Medical Director and Administrator also expressed misconceptions about the necessity of stop dates for hospice patients, believing that terminal status exempted them from this requirement. This lack of compliance with medication management protocols and monitoring requirements led to the identified deficiency.
Significant Medication Error: Plavix Not Administered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prevent a significant medication error involving a resident who did not receive an antiplatelet medication, Plavix, as ordered upon readmission. The resident, who had a history of chronic ulcer of the left heel, peripheral vascular disease, and cerebral infarction, was readmitted after a hospital stay where she underwent a drug-coated balloon angioplasty. The hospital discharge summary included an order for Plavix to be taken daily, but this order was not entered into the facility's electronic system by Nurse #2, who mistakenly thought it was a one-time order due to a misunderstanding of the start and stop dates. The error was compounded by the failure of the facility's process for verifying new admission orders. Nurse #2 did not clarify the Plavix order with the provider, and the second nurse check, which was supposed to ensure accuracy, was not effectively carried out. As a result, the resident's medication administration record for June did not include Plavix, and the resident did not receive the medication as prescribed. Interviews with the vascular PA and NP confirmed that Plavix was part of the standard protocol post-angioplasty to prevent re-occlusion of the blood vessel. The deficiency was identified when the Director of Nursing was informed by the Administrator about the missed Plavix order. The Medical Director acknowledged the omission as a significant medication error. Despite the error, the vascular PA and NP indicated that the lack of Plavix did not impact the resident's need for a left leg amputation, as the blood flow to the heel was not restored during the angioplasty, and the amputation was due to the occlusion of blood vessels leading to the heel.
Inaccurate Documentation of Advanced Directives
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain accurate advanced directives in the medical records for two residents. Resident #47 had a discrepancy between the Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) form, which indicated a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status, and the care plan, which incorrectly listed the resident as Full Code. This inconsistency was identified during a review of the resident's records, and it was noted that the care plan should have been updated to reflect the change in the resident's health directive. The Social Services Director acknowledged the error, stating that health directives should be consistent across the medical record, care plan, and health directive binder. Similarly, Resident #45's records showed a mismatch between the physician's orders, which indicated a DNR status, and the care plan, which still listed the resident as Full Code. The Social Services Director admitted that the care plan was not updated when the resident's code status changed. The administrator confirmed that the care plan should have been revised to reflect the updated advanced directive. These discrepancies highlight a failure in the facility's process for ensuring that residents' advanced directives are accurately documented and consistently updated across all relevant records.
Medication Administration Errors in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%, resulting in a 7.41% error rate. This was due to two medication errors out of 27 opportunities, affecting one resident. The first error involved the administration of Nifedipine ER tablets, which were nearly crushed by a nurse despite being extended-release medications that should not be crushed. The nurse was stopped multiple times during the process and eventually realized the mistake after reviewing the medication administration record. The nurse acknowledged that crushing the ER tablets would release the medication all at once, which could cause blood pressure issues for the resident. The second error involved the administration of incorrect eye drops. The nurse was unable to locate the prescribed Artificial Tears and instead administered a different type of lubricating eye drop, believing them to be the same. However, the pharmacist confirmed that the two medications were different, although they served the same purpose. The nurse did not verify with the physician or obtain an order to use the alternative eye drops, leading to the administration of the wrong medication. Interviews with the Director of Nursing, the Nurse Practitioner, and the Administrator revealed a lack of awareness and communication regarding these medication errors. The Director of Nursing and the Nurse Practitioner both stated that the nurse should have clarified the medications before administration. The Administrator was informed of the Nifedipine ER error but was unaware of the eye drop error, indicating a need for better oversight and education on medication administration protocols.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Resident with Chronic Ulcer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its infection prevention and control program by not implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with a chronic ulcer. The facility's policy requires EBP for residents with wounds to prevent the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. However, during multiple observations, it was noted that there were no personal protective equipment (PPE) supplies or EBP signage in the resident's room, and the Wound Care Nurse did not wear a gown while performing wound care. The resident in question had a chronic ulcer on her left heel, which required EBP according to the facility's policy. Observations revealed that the Wound Care Nurse only wore gloves and not a gown during wound care, which is a high-contact activity necessitating full PPE. The absence of PPE supplies and EBP signage was consistent over several days, indicating a systemic oversight in implementing the necessary precautions for the resident. Interviews with the Wound Care Nurse, Infection Preventionist, Director of Nursing, and Administrator revealed a lack of awareness and a process for ensuring EBP was in place for residents with wounds. The Infection Preventionist admitted to not having a good process for re-admissions needing EBP, which led to the oversight. The Director of Nursing and Administrator acknowledged the deficiency and the need for EBP for residents with wounds, but were unaware of the lapse until it was brought to their attention.
Failure to Maintain Proper Catheter Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to keep a urinary catheter drainage bag off the floor for a resident, increasing the risk of infection. Resident #2, who has a history of obstructive uropathy and chronic kidney disease, was observed propelling herself in a wheelchair with the catheter drainage bag dragging on the floor. The resident was unaware of the issue, and staff had previously repositioned the bag to prevent it from touching the floor. However, the bag was not properly secured, leading to it dragging on the floor during the resident's movement from the dining room to her room, a distance of 226 feet. Nurse #1, who was working her first day at the facility, and Nurse Aide #1, who was responsible for the resident's care that day, both acknowledged that the catheter drainage bag should not be on the floor. Despite recent in-service training on catheter care and infection control, the bag was still improperly positioned. The Infection Control Preventionist and the Director of Nursing also confirmed that the catheter drainage bag should be kept off the floor to prevent infections. The Director of Nursing attempted to reposition the bag, but the resident moved it again due to discomfort with its placement near the wheelchair wheel. The facility had previously conducted an in-service training on catheter care, but the issue persisted, indicating a failure in ensuring consistent adherence to infection control protocols by the staff.
Failure to Post Nurse Staffing Data at the Beginning of Each Shift
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to post nurse staffing data at the beginning of each shift for two consecutive days during the survey. On 4/30/24 at 11:00 AM, the nurse staffing data for 4/28/24 was observed, and on 5/1/24 at 10:37 AM, the nurse staffing data for 4/30/24 was observed. The data was not updated at the beginning of each shift as required. The Scheduler, who was responsible for posting the data, typically arrived after the first shift had started and left during the second shift. She admitted to posting the data only once daily and not adjusting it for any staffing changes per shift. Additionally, she was on vacation from 4/20/24 to 4/29/24 and did not ensure the data was posted correctly during her absence. Interviews with the Receptionist, ADON, DON, and Administrator revealed a lack of clarity and communication regarding the responsibility for posting nurse staffing data in the Scheduler's absence. The Receptionist stated she was not asked to post the data, and the ADON mentioned that the manager who arrived first should post it, but she did not typically check the postings. The DON was unsure who was responsible in the Scheduler's absence, and the Administrator expected the data to be posted daily but not necessarily at the beginning of each shift. This lack of coordination and adherence to regulatory requirements led to the deficiency in posting nurse staffing data accurately and timely.
Failure to Update Care Plan for Self-Administration of Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to update the comprehensive person-centered individualized care plan to reflect an assessment for a resident to self-administer medications. Resident #3, who was admitted with diagnoses including neuralgia and neuritis, was evaluated with intact cognition and no upper extremity impairment. Despite being assessed and approved by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) to self-administer pain relief creams, this approval was not reflected in the resident's care plan. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) completed the Self Administration of Medications assessment and educated the resident on the process but did not update the care plan accordingly. Interviews with the ADON, MDS Nurse, Director of Nursing (DON), and Nurse Practitioner (NP) revealed a lack of clarity and communication regarding the responsibility for updating the care plan. The ADON believed it was the MDS Nurse's responsibility, while the MDS Nurse was still in training and not yet familiar with the process. The DON acknowledged that the care plan could have included the task but did not confirm if it should have been added. The NP confirmed that the resident was competent to self-administer the pain relief creams and should have had a care plan addressing this ability. The Administrator stated that the facility was not required to develop a care plan for self-administration but only to complete an IDT assessment, which was done.
Transporter Failed to Call EMS After Resident's Fall in Van
Penalty
Summary
Transporter #1 failed to call emergency medical services (EMS) or have a resident assessed by a medical professional before moving a resident after his wheelchair tipped over and he fell to the floor of a transportation van. The incident occurred when Transporter #1 pulled out of the dialysis center parking lot, causing the resident's wheelchair to tip backwards, resulting in the resident hitting the left occipital region of his head. Despite the resident being on Plavix, an anti-platelet medication that can increase the risk of bleeding, Transporter #1 did not call EMS and instead moved the resident back into a sitting position and transported him back to the facility. Upon arrival at the facility, the resident was assessed to have a bump on his head behind his left ear and reported head pain and nausea. The resident was then sent to the hospital for evaluation, where a CT scan of the head was negative, and he returned to the facility the same day. Interviews with the resident and Transporter #1 revealed that the transporter was aware of the facility's policy to call EMS in such incidents but failed to do so due to being upset by the incident. The facility's policy and procedure for transportation vehicles, dated 10/2018, required drivers to halt any transport that seemed unsafe and to report any incidents to the Administrator and appropriate authorities. The transporter had been trained on these procedures but did not follow them during the incident. The failure to call EMS and have the resident assessed by a medical professional before moving him off the floor of the van was identified as a deficiency in the facility's handling of the situation.
Failure to Secure Wheelchair Leads to Resident Injury During Transport
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide safe transportation for a resident when his wheelchair tipped over in the transportation van, causing him to hit his head. The incident occurred when the transporter pulled out of the dialysis center parking lot, and the resident's wheelchair was not properly secured, leading to the fall. The resident, who was on blood-thinning medication, experienced head pain and nausea after the fall and was later sent to the hospital for evaluation. The investigation revealed that the transporter did not secure the wheelchair according to the manufacturer's instructions. The right front securement strap was positioned too far to the side, allowing the wheelchair to move and tip over. The Maintenance Director confirmed that the pin connectors and J-hooks were not correctly positioned, which contributed to the incident. The transporter, who had been with the facility for 16 months, had not experienced any previous incidents but failed to follow the proper procedure in this case. The resident involved in the incident was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses, including end-stage renal disease and diabetes, and used a manual wheelchair for mobility. The resident was cognitively intact and had limited range of motion due to a below-the-knee amputation. Despite the fall, the resident was alert and oriented when assessed by the Assistant Director of Nursing upon returning to the facility.
Failure to Assess Resident for Self-Administration of Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to assess whether the self-administration of medications was clinically appropriate for a resident who was observed to have a medication cup at their bedside. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had multiple diagnoses including acute posthemorrhagic anemia, end-stage renal disease, and diabetes, was admitted to the facility with a regimen of several medications to be taken in the morning. On a specific morning, the resident was observed with a medication cup containing 10 medications on their over-the-bed table, which they took after breakfast without a physician's order or a care plan in place for self-administration. Nurse #1, who was responsible for administering the medications, left them at the resident's bedside upon the resident's insistence, believing it was acceptable due to the resident's alert and oriented state. However, the facility's Director of Nursing and other staff members, including the Unit Manager and the Administrator, confirmed that medications should not be left at the bedside without an assessment for self-administration. The Nurse Practitioner noted that the resident sometimes refused medications, but missing a dose would not have harmed the resident. The incident highlighted a lapse in protocol adherence, as the resident had not been assessed for the ability to self-administer medications safely.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 215 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 8 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Charlotte
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sardis Oaks | 1 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| White Oak Manor - Charlotte | 1.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 2 |
| Pelican Health At Charlotte | 2.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 19 | 2 |
| Brookdale Carriage Club Providence | 2.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| The Citadel At Myers Park, Llc | 2.8 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Pelican Health Randolph Llc.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.