Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0687
D

Failure to Provide Timely Foot Care and Podiatry Services

Charlotte, North Carolina Survey Completed on 09-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to assess and provide appropriate foot care for two residents, both of whom had significant medical conditions that increased their risk for foot complications. One resident had a history of cerebral infarction with hemiplegia and diabetes mellitus, was severely cognitively impaired, and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. The other resident had polyosteoarthritis, peripheral vascular and arterial disease, muscle weakness, and required assistance with personal hygiene. Despite these needs, neither resident received regular foot assessments to determine if nail care was needed, nor were their toenails trimmed as required. Observations revealed that both residents had long, thick toenails with crusty material underneath, and their toenails extended significantly beyond the tips of their toes. Nursing staff acknowledged that the toenails were too long and thick to be managed by nursing staff and that podiatry intervention was necessary, especially for the diabetic resident. However, neither resident was scheduled for or seen by the podiatrist during the facility's podiatry clinics, and there were no records of podiatry consultations in their medical records. Interviews with facility staff, including the DON and NP, indicated a lack of awareness regarding the residents' need for podiatry services. The DON explained that the absence of a social worker, who was responsible for scheduling podiatry appointments, may have contributed to residents not being placed on the podiatry schedule. The facility held podiatry clinics every three months, but the process for ensuring residents in need were seen was not maintained, resulting in unmet foot care needs for these residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙