Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Longwood Community Living Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment and a history of inappropriate sexual behaviors was not provided with increased supervision or monitoring, despite escalating incidents and medication changes. This lack of proactive measures led to an incident where the resident inappropriately touched another resident who was severely cognitively impaired and unable to protect herself. Staff interviews confirmed that no additional monitoring was implemented, and the deficiency was acknowledged by facility leadership.
The facility failed to submit accurate PBJ staffing data for one quarter after termed employees' worked hours were not included in the submission. The CASPER report triggered for excessively low weekend staffing, and the ADM stated the error caused staffing to appear lower than it actually was because the Corporate Office submits the PBJ data.
A resident with dementia and severe cognitive impairment was listed as DNR in the chart and EMR, but the facility could not locate a signed DNR form. The record instead contained a signed CPR form and a physician DNR order, and the DON stated the family had signed DNR paperwork when hospice began, though the signed document was not found.
Dirty Resident Wheelchair: A resident's wheelchair was observed to be visibly soiled, with a caked, dried brown substance on the bottom frame. The resident, who had dementia and moderate cognitive impairment, said he had not noticed the wheelchair was that dirty. An LPN and the Administrator both confirmed the wheelchair was dirty and had not been cleaned in a while, and the facility stated it did not have a policy or procedure for routine wheelchair cleaning, monitoring, or maintenance.
Failure to Follow ADL Personal Hygiene Care Plans: Four residents had care plans that included personal hygiene and shaving needs, but observations and staff interviews showed they remained unshaven and not groomed as planned. A CNA and LPN confirmed that shaving was part of daily grooming, and the MDS Coordinator stated that if the residents were not shaved as indicated, their care plans were not being followed.
Failure to Provide Personal Hygiene and Shaving During ADL Care: Four residents were observed with visible facial hair and were not shaved on their scheduled shower days or over the weekend. A CNA and LPN confirmed that shaving is part of daily grooming and that the residents had not received the expected shower/shave care, while the DON stated female residents were expected to have no visible facial hair. The affected residents included cognitively intact and cognitively impaired individuals with diagnoses requiring assistance with personal care.
Improper Storage of Oxygen Tubing: Two residents had oxygen tubing wrapped around the top of portable O2 tanks instead of being stored in a plastic bag when not in use, contrary to facility policy. Staff, including an LPN and the DON, confirmed the tubing was not stored as required. One resident had COPD and was cognitively intact, while the other had COPD, Alzheimer’s disease, and moderate cognitive impairment.
A facility failed to ensure a narcotic lock box in a medication storage room refrigerator was properly secured. Surveyors observed the locked box was easily removable and contained Lorazepam, while an LPN believed it was secured and the DON confirmed it was not affixed to the refrigerator.
Missing Call Light at Resident Bedside: A resident with dementia and severe cognitive impairment was observed without a call light within reach and with no alternative way to request assistance. A housekeeper and an LPN both confirmed no call light was present at the bedside, and the DON stated residents are expected to have call lights available.
A facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity by posting a picture on social media that showed the resident in an undignified state, with visible wetness on her clothing. The resident, who had moderate cognitive impairment and was diagnosed with COPD and Alzheimer's, was photographed during an activity. Both the Administrator and DON confirmed the violation of the resident's rights, acknowledging the failure to adhere to facility policies on dignity and respect.
A facility failed to accurately document a resident's code status as specified in their Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care. The resident's document indicated 'Do not resuscitate after one (1) hour of trying,' but the facility's records showed a DNR status without these conditions. This inconsistency was confirmed by the Administrator, highlighting a failure to reflect the resident's end-of-life care wishes.
A resident in the facility was found with an overbed table that had exposed jagged edges due to the missing protective border. The resident, who had thin skin and moderate cognitive deficits, expressed concern about potential scratches or bruises. The DON confirmed the issue and acknowledged that it should have been addressed earlier, indicating a failure to maintain equipment safely as per facility policy.
Two residents with PTSD diagnoses did not have person-centered care plans addressing their condition. One resident, cognitively intact, lacked a PTSD care plan due to oversight, while another resident with moderate cognitive deficits also lacked a care plan, despite experiencing symptoms like nightmares and anxiety. Interviews confirmed the absence of necessary trauma-informed care plans.
A resident with a PTSD diagnosis did not receive a Trauma Informed Care Assessment as required by facility policy. Despite the resident's history of losing two children and exhibiting symptoms like nightmares and crying out in sleep, the Social Services staff was unaware of the PTSD diagnosis and failed to conduct the necessary assessment. The DON confirmed the oversight, noting the resident's upset over long-term stay and the family's dismissal of her nighttime disturbances.
Failure to Provide Adequate Supervision for Resident with Behavioral Disturbances
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and monitoring for a resident with a history of behavioral disturbances, including inappropriate sexual behaviors. The resident, who was moderately cognitively impaired and diagnosed with dementia, bipolar disorder, and Alzheimer's disease, exhibited escalating inappropriate behaviors over a documented period. Despite an increase in medication dosage and multiple psychiatric evaluations, there was no documentation or implementation of increased supervision or monitoring for this resident. Staff interviews confirmed awareness of the resident's behaviors but revealed that no additional monitoring measures were put in place. An incident occurred in which the resident attempted to touch another resident, who was severely cognitively impaired and unable to protect herself, inappropriately. Staff intervened immediately during the incident, but records and interviews indicated that the facility had not taken proactive steps to prevent such events by increasing supervision. The Director of Nursing and other staff acknowledged the lack of documentation and implementation of increased monitoring, despite the resident's ongoing behavioral issues.
Inaccurate PBJ Staffing Data Submission
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to submit accurate staffing data into the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system for one quarter reviewed, specifically the 3rd Quarter 2025. Record review of the facility policy titled, Staffing Hours-Monitoring of Policy and Procedure, showed the purpose was to assure staffing met federal and state guidelines. Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report CASPER Report 1705D for FY Quarter 3 2025 (April 1-June 30) showed the facility triggered for excessively low weekend staffing. During interview, the Administrator stated the data submitted to PBJ was not accurate because termed employees' worked hours were not included during the quarter, which caused the report to show low weekend staffing even though staffing was actually adequate. The Administrator identified this as a data entry error and stated the Corporate Office submits the PBJ information, and the facility was unaware it had triggered for low weekend staffing.
Missing Signed DNR Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident #6’s right to participate in healthcare decision-making regarding advance directives and code status was honored. The resident’s record showed a code status of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), but the chart contained a signed CPR form rather than a signed DNR order or signed DNR form. The facility policy stated that the resident’s advance directives would be recorded in the resident clinical record, yet the supporting documentation in the electronic medical record linked the DNR status to a CPR form signed by the resident representative. Resident #6 was admitted with dementia, and the Minimum Data Set showed a BIMS score of 01, indicating cognitive impairment. A physician’s order for DNR was present in the chart, and the DON stated the resident’s son signed paperwork when the resident went on hospice services, but the signed DNR document could not be located. RN #1 stated she relied on the resident profile and chart to identify the resident as DNR and was unaware that no signed DNR form was on file.
Dirty Resident Wheelchair
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a homelike environment by not maintaining resident equipment in a clean condition. During observation on 12/09/25, Resident #48's wheelchair was visibly dirty, with a caked, dried brown substance on the bottom frame. The resident stated he had not realized the wheelchair was that dirty until it was brought to his attention and said it needed to be cleaned. An LPN later observed the wheelchair and stated it should have been cleaned on the night shift. During an interview with the Administrator, she observed the wheelchair and confirmed it was dirty and had not been cleaned in a while. She stated the resident spills food and liquids onto the chair often and said she expected wheelchairs to be cleaned on the night shift. Record review showed Resident #48 was admitted on 7/23/2025 with dementia, and the MDS dated 11/30/2025 documented a BIMS score of 08, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Facility documentation dated 12/10/25 stated the facility did not have a policy or procedure addressing routine cleaning, monitoring, or maintenance of resident wheelchairs to ensure a homelike environment.
Failure to Follow ADL Personal Hygiene Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement care plans related to ADL needs, specifically personal hygiene and shaving, for four sampled residents. The facility policy stated that each resident's care plan would remain current and inform staff of the resident's needs, strengths, goals, and approaches. The care plans for Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #27, and Resident #40 all included personal hygiene interventions that addressed shaving or grooming needs, but observations and interviews showed those interventions were not being carried out as planned. Resident #7, a cognitively intact female resident with primary lateral sclerosis, chronic weakness, and decreased mobility, had a care plan stating she usually required substantial to dependent assistance with personal hygiene, including shaving. She was observed on two consecutive days with sporadic facial hair on her chin measuring about one-half inch, and she stated she did not like the hair on her chin. CNA #2 confirmed she had a shower that morning and still had long chin hair, and stated she should have been shaved. LPN #2 also confirmed the long chin hair and stated shaving was part of daily grooming. Resident #8, Resident #27, and Resident #40 each had ADL care plans that included personal hygiene or shaving interventions, and each was observed with facial hair that had not been removed. Resident #8, who had moderate cognitive impairment, was observed with whiskers on his cheeks, chin, and upper lip and stated he preferred to be clean-shaven; CNA #1 confirmed he did not receive a shower or shave on the referenced Saturday. Resident #27, who also had moderate cognitive impairment, was observed with facial hair on his cheeks, upper lip, and chin and stated he wanted to be clean-shaven; CNA #1 confirmed he did not receive a shower or shave on the referenced Saturday. Resident #40, a cognitively intact female resident with cerebral infarction, was observed with full facial hair on her cheeks, upper lip, and chin and stated she would like to be clean-shaven; CNA #4 confirmed she did not receive a shower or shave on the referenced Saturday. The MDS Coordinator stated that shaving and grooming needs were addressed in the ADL personal hygiene care plan and confirmed that if these residents were not shaved as indicated, their care plans were not being followed.
Failure to Provide Personal Hygiene and Shaving During ADL Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide personal hygiene care, including shaving and grooming, for four residents who were unable to complete these activities independently. The facility policy stated that resident ADL care would be provided according to individualized resident needs, and staff interviews confirmed that shaving was considered part of daily grooming and was expected to be completed on shower days. Survey observations and interviews showed that the residents had visible facial hair that remained unchanged over the observation period or had not been addressed on their scheduled shower days. Resident #7, a cognitively intact female resident with Primary Lateral Sclerosis, lack of coordination, and a need for assistance with personal care, was observed with sporadic facial hair on her chin measuring about one-half inch in length. She stated she did not like the hair on her chin, and the next day the facial hair remained unchanged. A CNA confirmed the resident had a shower that morning but had not been shaved, and an LPN stated the resident should not have long facial hair after her shower. The DON stated the facility expected female residents to have no visible facial hair and that shaving was part of personal hygiene completed on shower days. Resident #8, a resident with diagnoses including need for assistance with personal care and a BIMS score indicating moderate cognitive impairment, was observed with approximately three-fourths of an inch-long whiskers on his cheeks, chin, and upper lip and stated he preferred to be clean-shaven. Resident #27, a resident with Alzheimer's Disease and moderate cognitive impairment, was observed with facial hair on his cheeks, upper lip, and chin about one-half inch long and stated he wanted to be clean-shaven. Staff confirmed both residents did not receive a shower or shave on their scheduled day, and the CNA and LPN stated they were not notified of any refusal. Resident #40, a cognitively intact female resident with Cerebral Infarction, was observed with full facial hair covering her cheeks, chin, and upper lip and stated she did not get a shower and shave over the weekend and did not like the hair on her face. The DON confirmed she had full facial hair and stated female residents were expected to have no visible facial hair, with shaving completed on shower days.
Improper Storage of Oxygen Tubing
Penalty
Summary
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed was not maintained when the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was properly stored when not in use. Facility policy titled, "Oxygen Concentrator Cleaning Policy and Procedure" stated that oxygen tubing, cannula, and mask should be stored in a plastic bag when not in use. During an observation on 12/08/2025 at 3:20 PM, Resident #19's oxygen tubing was observed wrapped around the top of the portable oxygen tank instead of being stored in a bag, and a CLPN confirmed this during an interview on 12/09/2025 at 1:35 PM. A similar observation was made for Resident #27 on 12/08/2025 at 10:27 AM, when the resident's oxygen tubing was also seen wrapped around the top of the portable oxygen tank rather than stored in a bag. The DON confirmed on 12/09/2025 at 1:45 PM that oxygen tubing should always be stored in a bag when not in use to keep it clean. Resident #19 was admitted with COPD and had a BIMS score of 15, indicating cognitive intactness, while Resident #27 was admitted with COPD, Alzheimer's disease, and need for assistance with personal care, and had a BIMS score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment.
Improperly Secured Narcotic Lock Box in Medication Refrigerator
Penalty
Summary
Medications and biologicals were not stored in accordance with accepted professional principles because the facility failed to ensure a narcotic lock box inside the C Hall medication storage room refrigerator was properly secured. During observation, the lock box was found locked but not affixed to the refrigerator and was easily removable, and it contained a bottle of Lorazepam. Review of the facility's Medications Storage Policy and Procedure stated that medications and biologicals are to be properly secured according to CMS guidelines. An LPN stated she believed the lock box was secured properly, and the DON later confirmed that the lock box was not secured and said it had been secured in the past, but she was unaware it was no longer affixed to the refrigerator.
Missing Call Light at Resident Bedside
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident had a call system available in her room for one of 18 resident rooms reviewed. Facility policy stated that call lights are provided so residents can notify staff to meet their needs. On 12/08/25, observation found Resident #6 in her room without a call light within reach and with no alternative method available to request assistance. A second observation on 12/09/25 again found no call light present within reach and no alternative method available. A housekeeper stated the resident did not have a call light, and an LPN stated there was no call light at the bedside and she did not know if it had been borrowed and placed in another resident's room, though she said one had been present previously. The DON stated all residents are expected to have call lights at their bedside so they can request assistance as needed. Resident #6 was admitted with dementia, and the MDS showed a BIMS score of 01, indicating severe cognitive impairment.
Violation of Resident Dignity Due to Inappropriate Social Media Post
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the dignity of a resident by posting a picture on its social media account that portrayed the resident in an undignified manner. The picture showed the resident sitting in a wheelchair, holding a cup of ice cream, while dressed in a blue long-sleeved shirt and peach-colored pants. The resident appeared to be wet between her mid-thighs and on her right leg, with the wetness extending to her knees, indicating a lack of personal care. This incident was identified through observation of the social media post, staff and resident interviews, and a review of facility policies. The resident involved had been admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Alzheimer's Disease, and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score indicating moderate cognitive impairment. During interviews, both the Administrator and the Director of Nursing acknowledged that the picture violated the resident's rights and confirmed that the facility failed to ensure the resident's dignity was maintained before the picture was posted. The facility's policies on resident rights and dignity emphasize treating residents with respect and ensuring their well-being, which were not adhered to in this instance.
Inaccurate Code Status Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a resident's code status, which was inconsistent with the resident's Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care. The resident, who was moderately impaired cognitively, had a Durable Power of Attorney document specifying 'Do not resuscitate after one (1) hour of trying' and 'No life support machine(s) in any town city, or state.' However, the facility's records, including the physician's orders and code status form, indicated a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status without the specified conditions. This discrepancy was confirmed during an interview with the Administrator, who acknowledged that the facility's documentation did not reflect the resident's end-of-life care wishes as outlined in the Durable Power of Attorney. The resident, who was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dysphagia following cerebral infarction and chronic kidney disease, had a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The facility's policy on advance directives requires that such documents be maintained in the resident's medical record and that the attending physician be notified of any advance directives or changes. Despite this policy, the facility failed to accurately document the resident's specific wishes for end-of-life care, potentially leading to a situation where the resident's desired care was not provided.
Unsafe Overbed Table with Exposed Jagged Edges
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a safe environment for a resident, as evidenced by an overbed table with exposed jagged edges. The maintenance department is responsible for maintaining equipment in a safe and operable manner, according to the facility's policy. However, during an observation and interview, it was found that the protective border was missing from all four sides of the overbed table, leaving rough, jagged areas exposed. The resident expressed concern that these edges could scratch or bruise her, especially since she had thin skin that could easily tear. The Director of Nursing confirmed the condition of the overbed table and acknowledged that it should have been noticed and replaced earlier. The resident involved had been admitted with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, anxiety, and muscle weakness. Her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated moderate cognitive deficits, with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10. This deficiency highlights the facility's failure to adhere to its maintenance policy, potentially compromising the resident's safety and comfort.
Failure to Develop PTSD Care Plans for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop person-centered care plans for two residents diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Resident #11, who was admitted with a PTSD diagnosis among other conditions, did not have a care plan addressing her PTSD. Interviews with the resident, RN/MDS Coordinator, and the Director of Nurses confirmed the absence of a comprehensive care plan for PTSD, which was acknowledged as an oversight. The resident's cognitive status was intact, as indicated by a BIMS score of 15, yet the necessary trauma-informed care plan was not implemented. Similarly, Resident #37, who had a PTSD diagnosis added to her records, also lacked a care plan addressing her PTSD, including triggers or interventions. The resident, who experienced significant personal losses, reported symptoms such as nightmares and anxiety. Interviews with the RN/MDS Coordinator and the Director of Nurses confirmed the absence of a comprehensive care plan for PTSD, which should have been developed to address the resident's individualized needs. The resident's cognitive status showed moderate deficits with a BIMS score of 10, yet the trauma-informed care assessment was not completed.
Failure to Conduct Trauma Informed Care Assessment for Resident with PTSD
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete a Trauma Informed Care Assessment for a resident diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The resident, who had a history of losing two children, was observed to have nightmares and cried out in her sleep. Despite these symptoms and a new PTSD diagnosis, the Social Services staff did not conduct the required assessment. The Social Services staff admitted to being unaware of the resident's PTSD diagnosis and acknowledged that an assessment should have been completed upon the new diagnosis. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the resident was admitted for therapy services and later informed by her family that she would remain in the facility long-term, which upset her. The DON also noted that the family had mentioned the resident's nighttime disturbances but did not consider them significant. A psychiatric Nurse Practitioner evaluated the resident and added the PTSD diagnosis, yet the Trauma Informed Care Assessment was overlooked. The facility's policy mandates such assessments for residents with trauma histories, but this was not adhered to in this case.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 61 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Booneville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center | 0.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Nmmc Baldwyn Nursing Facility | 11.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 0 |
| Cornerstone Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center | 19.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 0 |
| Ms Care Center Of Alcorn County, Inc-snf | 19.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
| Tippah County Nursing Home | 22.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Longwood Community Living Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.