Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Pearl Of Rolling Meadows,the during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident received Quetiapine for behavioral disturbances and agitation without documented informed consent from the resident’s representative, despite facility policy requiring that the resident, family, or POA be informed of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications and that consent be obtained. A nurse acknowledged taking the psychiatric medication orders without securing consent, and the DON confirmed that nurses are expected to obtain consent when such orders are received.
A resident with hypothyroidism reported not receiving her scheduled early-morning thyroid medication. Review of the eMAR showed multiple missing nurse signatures for ordered levothyroxine doses at the designated administration time, and there was no documented reason for any omitted doses. A nurse stated she either was not working those days or may have forgotten to sign, while the DON confirmed that unsigned medications are considered not given. This occurred despite facility policies requiring RNs and LPNs to follow MD orders, document all medications in the EHR, and record reasons when medications are not administered.
The facility did not enforce its smoking policy, allowing residents to smoke near the main entry door and failing to provide metal containers with self-closing covers in designated smoking areas. Staff were aware that residents were not consistently using the designated area, and cigarette butts were observed in multiple locations without the required safety equipment.
Care Plan Not Updated After Injury of Unknown Origin: A resident with dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and osteoarthritis had an injury of unknown origin, but the comprehensive care plan did not reflect the related interventions. Staff observed the resident in a wheelchair with a pillow on the back and no geri sleeves, while the DON, restorative nurse, and RN stated the updated interventions were not on the care plan.
A resident with delirium and cognitive impairment was transferred to the emergency room after an unwitnessed fall, but staff failed to notify the receiving hospital as required by facility policy. Nurses on duty did not communicate the transfer, believing it was the ambulance driver's responsibility, despite the resident's inability to advocate for themselves.
Three residents with dementia and high fall risk experienced multiple unwitnessed falls, including incidents in the dining room and hallways, due to inadequate supervision and insufficient implementation of care plan interventions. One resident sustained a hip fracture and head injury, while another fell after dozing off in a wheelchair, and a third had repeated falls related to impulsive behaviors and lack of monitoring. Staff interviews confirmed that supervision was not consistently maintained, especially during busy periods such as mealtimes.
Several dependent residents did not receive scheduled showers or adequate grooming, with documentation and observation confirming infrequent bathing and poor hygiene. Residents reported missed showers and primarily received bed baths, despite care plans and facility policy requiring regular showers and hygiene support. No documentation of shower refusals was provided, indicating a failure to ensure necessary ADL care.
Multiple residents reported that food was consistently cold, bland, or unappetizing, with some relying on outside food or groceries instead of facility meals. Grievances and council meeting minutes documented ongoing dissatisfaction with meal quality, temperature, and variety. The Dietary Director was not always present at council meetings and relied on staff to communicate resident concerns, indicating a breakdown in addressing food-related issues.
A resident dependent on staff for ADLs was not provided timely incontinence care, resulting in prolonged exposure to urine, skin redness, and excoriation. The resident was found with two soaked adult briefs and wet bedding, and staff confirmed the lack of care since the previous night. Facility leadership acknowledged this was unacceptable and not in accordance with the care plan or facility policy.
Staff did not consistently document the administration of narcotic medications on required count sheets or ensure that actual medication amounts matched records. During medication cart reviews, discrepancies were found between documented and actual quantities of morphine sulfate and lorazepam for three residents with complex medical histories. Nursing staff were unable to explain the differences, and required protocols for documentation and reconciliation of controlled substances were not followed.
A resident's UTI was not managed properly due to a delay in administering the prescribed antibiotic Bactrim and a failure to document its administration. Additionally, a urinalysis was not conducted as ordered, only a urine culture was performed. These actions contributed to a deficiency in the resident's care.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of aggression was involved in an altercation with another resident, resulting in physical contact classified as abuse. Despite the known aggressive behaviors, the resident was not monitored closely, leading to the incident. The facility's policy on abuse was not upheld, as the residents' right to be free from abuse was compromised.
A facility failed to return a resident's belongings after discharge, leading to a deficiency in misappropriation of property. The resident was discharged after calling 911 and being admitted to another facility. Despite multiple calls from the resident, the facility did not return his items, including books and clothing, which were discarded after 30 days. The facility lacked an inventory list for the resident's belongings, contributing to the deficiency.
A resident with multiple health issues, including a surgical wound, did not receive prescribed wound care, and necessary medical documentation was not sent to a follow-up appointment. The surgeon reported the absence of paperwork and unchanged wound dressing, contrary to facility claims. Staff interviews revealed discrepancies in handling the resident's care and documentation, violating facility policies.
Two residents reported a lack of bath towels, impacting their ability to maintain personal hygiene. Staff interviews and observations revealed systemic issues in linen management, including insufficient towel supply and limited laundry room hours. The facility lacks a dedicated laundry supervisor, contributing to the problem.
A high fall risk resident with dementia and repeated falls history rolled out of bed during incontinence care, resulting in a head laceration requiring sutures. The CNA providing care momentarily turned away, and bed bolsters were not confirmed to be in place, leading to inadequate supervision and safety measures.
The facility failed to ensure call light cords were within reach for four residents capable of using them. Observations revealed that the cords were either misplaced, tangled, or wrapped around objects, making them inaccessible. Staff acknowledged the requirement for cords to be within easy reach, but this was not adhered to, resulting in a deficiency.
Failure to Obtain Informed Consent for Psychotropic Medication
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to obtain informed consent for the use of psychotropic medication for one resident (R2). Record review on 4/9/2026 showed physician orders dated 1/8/2026 for Quetiapine Fumarate 25 mg, to give 0.5 tablet by mouth three times a day for behavioral disturbances, with instructions to hold if drowsiness noted. An additional order dated 1/25/2026 directed Quetiapine Fumarate 25 mg, 12.5 mg by mouth STAT one time only for agitation. The facility’s policy on Psychotropic Drug Use, revised 6/11/2025, requires that when an order is obtained for a psychotropic medication, the resident, family, or POA must be informed of the risks and benefits and that the facility must obtain informed consent, including the option for phone consent documented in the medical record if the responsible party cannot sign. During interviews on 4/9/2026, the nurse (V4) stated that after speaking with the nurse practitioner about R2’s behaviors, an increase in psychiatric medication was ordered and that she did not obtain consent. V4 acknowledged that when nurses take an order for an antipsychotic medication, they should obtain consent. The DON (V2) stated that her expectation is that when a nurse obtains an order for a psychiatric medication, that nurse should obtain consent right away. Despite these expectations and the written policy, there was no evidence that informed consent related to the risks and benefits of Quetiapine Fumarate was obtained from R2’s representative for the psychotropic medication orders identified in the record review.
Failure to Ensure Thyroid Medication Was Administered and Documented as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified that the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician for one resident receiving thyroid medication. The resident reported on 4/7/2026 at 11:40 a.m. that she does not receive her medication at 6:00 a.m. and stated that this medication helps to balance her thyroid. Review of the electronic medication administration record (eMAR) on 4/7/2026 at 2:00 p.m. showed that levothyroxine sodium 125 mcg, ordered to be given once daily by mouth for unspecified hypothyroidism, lacked nurse signatures on three separate 6:00 a.m. administration times: 3/5/2026, 3/28/2026, and 4/3/2026. The resident’s care plan identified her as at risk for manifestations of hypothyroidism, with an intervention to administer hypothyroidism medication as per MD order. During an interview on 4/9/2026 at 1:00 p.m., a nurse (V9) stated that she did not work on those days and commented that she thought she would have signed the medications out or may have forgotten to sign them out. Later that day at 1:45 p.m., the DON (V2) stated that she expects nurses to sign out all medications and that if a medication is not signed, it was not given. Facility policies titled “Physician Orders” and “Medication Administration” require that licensed nurses follow physician orders, document them in a timely manner, ensure all complete orders are entered in the EHR, and, if a medication is not given as ordered, document the reason on the MAR. These policies were not followed as evidenced by the missing documentation for the resident’s levothyroxine doses on the identified dates and times.
Failure to Enforce Smoking Policy and Provide Required Safety Equipment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement its smoking policy by allowing residents to smoke near the main entry door and by not providing metal containers with self-closing cover devices in designated smoking areas. Observations revealed that cigarette butts were found on the ground near benches close to the main entry door, as well as in the designated smoking areas on both the left and right sides of the building. The facility's policy specifies that smoking is only permitted in designated outdoor areas and that metal containers with self-closing covers must be available in these areas. Interviews with staff confirmed that residents were not consistently using the designated smoking area and that staff were aware of the issue but had not ensured compliance. Four residents who smoke were identified, and at least one resident admitted to sometimes smoking in non-designated areas. Staff acknowledged that residents were being told to use the designated area, but enforcement was lacking, and the required safety equipment was not present in the smoking areas.
Care Plan Not Updated After Injury of Unknown Origin
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise and update the comprehensive care plan for a resident identified with an injury of unknown origin. The resident was admitted on 11/6/2018 and had diagnoses including senile degeneration of brain, Alzheimer's disease, primary generalized osteoarthritis, and vascular dementia. On 11/25/2025, the resident was observed seated in a wheelchair in the second-floor dining room with a pillow on her back and no protective geri sleeves worn. Review of the Illinois Department of Public Health final report dated 8/25/2025 showed that the resident's interventions included staff placing pillows on her sides when up in the wheelchair to provide additional support or cushioning when leaning on a hard surface, and providing Gerisleeves to both arms. Review of the comprehensive care plan did not show the occurrence or revision of interventions related to the resident's injury of unknown origin dated 8/20/2025. The DON and Restorative Nurse stated there was no care plan revision or update addressing the pillows on the sides while sitting in the wheelchair and the bilateral protective sleeves, and the RN stated she knew about the injury but did not know the new interventions on the care plan.
Failure to Notify Receiving Hospital of Resident Transfer
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when staff failed to notify the local emergency room hospital of a resident's transfer following an unwitnessed fall. The resident, who was found on the bedroom floor with a pillow under his head, was alert but only oriented to one sphere and unable to explain what happened. The nurse on duty prepared documents and gave a report to the oncoming nurse but did not notify the receiving hospital, citing uncertainty about the ambulance's arrival time. The oncoming nurse also did not notify the emergency room, stating that it was the ambulance driver's responsibility. Both the Director of Nursing and the Administrator stated that it is expected for nurses to notify the receiving facility of any transfer, especially for residents unable to advocate for themselves. The resident involved had a diagnosis of delirium due to a known physiological condition, cognitive function impairment, and abnormalities in gait and mobility, as documented in the admission record and care plan. Facility policy requires that the receiving facility be notified during emergency transfers or discharges. Despite this policy, the required notification was not made, resulting in a failure to communicate essential information about the resident's condition and transfer to the emergency room.
Failure to Provide Adequate Supervision and Fall Prevention for High-Risk Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implement effective interventions for residents at high risk for falls, particularly those with wandering behaviors. Three residents with significant cognitive impairments and histories of falls experienced multiple unwitnessed falls, some resulting in serious injuries. One resident with dementia and behavioral disturbances sustained a right hip fracture and a head laceration requiring medical treatment after repeated falls, some of which occurred in the dining room and were unwitnessed due to insufficient staff presence. Staff interviews confirmed that at times, only one nurse was present in the dining room while other staff were occupied with tasks such as passing trays or assisting other residents, leaving high-risk residents without adequate supervision. Another resident with Alzheimer's and agitation experienced an unwitnessed fall in the dining room after apparently falling asleep in her wheelchair while waiting for dinner. Staff acknowledged that the fall was unwitnessed because they were engaged in other duties, such as passing trays, and were unable to intervene in time. The care plan for this resident identified her as high risk for falls, but the interventions in place were not sufficient to prevent the incident. A third resident with dementia and behavioral disturbance had multiple unwitnessed falls both in his room and in the hallway, often related to attempts to self-transfer or move without assistance. Despite being identified as high risk for falls and requiring frequent supervision, the resident was able to move about unsupervised, leading to repeated incidents. Staff interviews indicated that interventions such as keeping the resident close to staff for monitoring were not consistently implemented, contributing to the occurrence of unwitnessed falls.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Showers and Grooming for Dependent Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate shower and grooming care for residents who are dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL). Multiple residents reported not receiving scheduled showers, with documentation and observation confirming that showers were missed or infrequent, and bed baths were often substituted. For example, one resident, with a history of hemiplegia and chronic illnesses, stated she did not receive her scheduled showers twice a week and could not recall her last shower, reporting that her skin felt raw. Shower records showed she received only about four showers over a three-month period, despite being totally dependent on staff for bathing. Another resident, with spinal stenosis and lymphedema, reported receiving only three showers since admission and was primarily given bed baths, despite being scheduled for showers twice weekly and requiring substantial assistance. A third resident, with bilateral leg amputations and end-stage renal disease, also reported not getting out of bed or receiving showers, with records indicating only one shower in three months. This resident expressed willingness to receive showers, suggesting lack of refusal. A fourth resident, with severe obesity and neurocognitive disorder, was observed with poor hygiene, dirty fingernails, and overgrown hair, and had only about four showers documented over three months, despite care plans specifying regular hygiene and grooming. Interviews with the administrator revealed that staff are expected to document refusals and offer alternative care, but no documentation of refusals was provided for these residents. Facility policy requires showers to be offered and encouraged twice a week, with refusals and alternative care to be documented and communicated as needed. The lack of documentation and observed poor hygiene indicate that the facility did not ensure dependent residents received necessary ADL care as required.
Failure to Provide Palatable and Properly Tempered Food
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide palatable, attractive, and appropriately tempered food and drink to all 13 residents reviewed for dining. Multiple residents reported dissatisfaction with the quality, temperature, and variety of food, with several stating that meals were consistently cold, bland, or unappetizing. Some residents indicated they avoided facility meals altogether, relying on outside food or groceries stored in their rooms. Specific complaints included hard waffles, insufficient frosting on cake, lack of sauce or spices, and poor quality of food items. Seven grievances were filed over a nearly three-month period, all related to food concerns such as cold meals and general dislike of the food served. Resident Council Meeting minutes corroborated these issues, noting complaints about cold food and inadequate meal preparation. The Dietary Director acknowledged not always attending resident council meetings and stated that staff were expected to communicate resident concerns to her for follow-up, suggesting a breakdown in communication regarding food-related grievances. The consistent and widespread nature of the complaints, as well as documentation in both grievances and council minutes, demonstrate a pattern of failure to meet residents' expectations for meal quality and palatability.
Failure to Provide Timely Incontinence Care
Penalty
Summary
A resident with a history of hemiplegia, hemiparesis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic kidney disease, who is dependent on staff for activities of daily living, was not provided timely incontinence care. The resident reported not being changed since the previous night and stated she was very wet, with her last incontinence care occurring before bedtime the previous day. Upon observation, the resident was found with two soaked adult briefs, a wet bed pad and sheet with brownish stains, and redness and excoriation on her bottom. Staff confirmed the resident's condition and stated that barrier cream is applied after each change, but could not explain why two briefs were used, except that the resident often gets wet and prefers two briefs. The care plan indicated the need for assistance with toileting and incontinence care as needed, but these interventions were not followed as required. Facility leadership, including the DON, CNO, and Administrator, acknowledged that it is not acceptable for a resident to wait an entire day for incontinence care or to be left soaking wet, regardless of the use of two briefs. The facility's urinary incontinence care policy requires incontinence care to be provided every shift based on resident needs, and staff are expected to ensure that incontinence needs are met. The failure to provide timely incontinence care resulted in the resident experiencing prolonged exposure to urine, skin redness, and excoriation.
Failure to Accurately Document and Reconcile Controlled Substances
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to follow established medication administration policies regarding the documentation and reconciliation of controlled substances for multiple residents. Specifically, staff did not consistently document the administration of narcotic medications on the narcotic count sheets, nor did they ensure that the actual amounts of medication on hand matched the amounts recorded. For one resident with a history of malignant neoplasm, chronic pancreatitis, dementia, and diabetes, the narcotic administration sheet indicated 5ml of morphine sulfate remaining, while only 3.5ml was present in the medication bottle. Another resident with a history of restlessness, anxiety, and cancer had a discrepancy between the narcotic count sheet, which showed 17.5ml of lorazepam remaining, and the actual bottle, which contained more than 30ml. A third resident with osteoarthritis, diabetes, and legal blindness had 25mg of morphine sulfate on hand, while the count sheet documented 28.5mg remaining. These discrepancies were observed during medication cart reviews with nursing staff, who were unable to account for the differences between documented and actual medication quantities. The facility's protocol requires complete documentation in the narcotic book prior to administration, verification of counts with each administration, and shift-to-shift reconciliation by both outgoing and incoming nurses. However, staff failed to consistently follow these procedures, resulting in inaccurate narcotic counts and incomplete documentation for controlled substances.
Failure in UTI Management and Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate clinical management for a urinary tract infection (UTI) for one resident. On January 13, 2025, an order was received to start the resident on the antibiotic Bactrim, to be administered twice daily for three days. However, the first dose was not given as scheduled at 1800 hours on January 13, 2025, due to the nurse on duty not administering it. The following morning, another nurse administered the antibiotic at 0900 hours but failed to document the administration in the electronic medication administration record (EMAR). This lack of documentation and delay in medication administration contributed to the deficiency. Additionally, there was a failure to conduct a urinalysis (UA) as ordered on January 11, 2025. The order was mistakenly entered only for a urine culture, and the nurse practitioner was not informed that the UA was not performed. This oversight in following the correct order process further highlights the deficiency in the resident's care. Despite these issues, the facility's policies and procedures, including those related to fall prevention and medication administration, were reviewed and found to have no concerns.
Failure to Prevent Resident-to-Resident Physical Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical abuse, as evidenced by an incident involving two residents. Resident R4, a 79-year-old with severe cognitive impairment and a history of physical aggression, was involved in an altercation with Resident R3, a 90-year-old with Alzheimer's and dementia. On the day of the incident, R4 attempted to maneuver R3's wheelchair, leading to an accidental contact with R3's face. This incident was witnessed by a CNA, who reported that R4's hand made contact with R3's face during the altercation. The LPN on duty heard the commotion and found R3 with a reddened face, indicating physical contact. R4 was known for aggressive behaviors and should have been monitored closely to prevent such incidents. The facility's failure to monitor R4 adequately allowed the resident to engage in an altercation with R3, resulting in physical contact that was classified as abuse. Despite R4's known history of aggression and the need for close monitoring, the staff did not prevent the interaction between the two residents. The incident was reported to the state agency, and both residents' families and physicians were notified. R4 was subsequently sent to the hospital for evaluation, and R3 underwent a facial X-ray, which showed no fractures. The facility's policy on abuse emphasizes the residents' right to be free from abuse, yet this incident highlights a lapse in ensuring that right for R3.
Failure to Return Resident's Belongings After Discharge
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to return a resident's personal belongings after discharge, resulting in a deficiency related to the misappropriation of property. The resident, identified as R1, was discharged from the facility after calling 911 and being admitted to another facility. Despite several phone calls from R1 regarding his belongings, the facility did not return his items, which included books and clothing. The Social Service Director, V5, acknowledged that R1 had called multiple times about his belongings, but only his mail was available for pickup. The Housekeeping Supervisor, V6, stated that R1's belongings, including three boxes of books, were discarded after 30 days. The facility's Administrator, V1, later found two boxes of R1's belongings, which included crayons and papers, but there was no inventory list for R1's belongings. The Facility Concern Form indicated that R1 was informed about the need to pick up his belongings due to storage limitations, but there was no follow-through. The facility's policy on abuse and misappropriation of property defines such actions as the wrongful use of a resident's belongings without consent. The lack of an inventory list and the discarding of R1's belongings without proper communication or consent led to the deficiency.
Failure to Provide Prescribed Wound Care and Documentation for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's prescribed treatment was performed for a surgical wound and did not send necessary medical information with the resident to a surgical follow-up appointment. The resident, a male with multiple diagnoses including orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation and type 2 diabetes with foot ulcer, was readmitted to the facility and had a follow-up appointment with his surgeon. However, the resident arrived at the appointment without any paperwork, which was a significant issue as reported by the surgeon. The surgeon also noted that the resident's wound dressing appeared unchanged since discharge, contrary to the facility's claim that the dressing had been changed. The Treatment Administration Record for the resident showed no documentation of the prescribed treatment being performed on a specific date, and the facility's policies required that necessary paperwork be sent with residents to appointments. Interviews with facility staff revealed discrepancies in the handling of the resident's paperwork and wound care, with the LPN claiming to have sent the paperwork with the driver, but the surgeon reporting its absence. The facility's Wound Prevention and Healing Policy and Appointments and Transportation Policy were not adhered to, leading to the deficiency.
Inadequate Supply of Bath Towels for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide an adequate supply of bath towels to meet the needs and preferences of its residents, affecting at least two residents. One resident, a female with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and other medical conditions, reported that since her admission, she has frequently experienced a lack of shower supplies, including towels. She expressed dissatisfaction with having to wait for towels and the impact it had on her ability to maintain personal hygiene. Another resident, also with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and additional health issues, independently takes showers but consistently finds towels unavailable, especially after the laundry room closes at 5:30 pm. Observations and interviews with staff revealed systemic issues in the facility's linen management. The laundry aide confirmed that no linen was washed on a particular day because a staff member was reassigned to other duties, leaving the linen rooms without towels. The laundry room operates only until 5:30 pm, and there is no staff available to manage linen needs after this time. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the shortage of towels and bed linen, noting that the current supply is insufficient for the facility's census of 127 residents. Further investigation showed that the facility lacks a dedicated laundry/housekeeping supervisor, with a housekeeping aide acting in this role without the authority to order supplies. The acting supervisor relies on another staff member to list needed supplies, which are then ordered by the Administrator. The facility's policy mandates a safe and comfortable environment with adequate linen supplies, but the current practices fall short of these requirements, leading to resident dissatisfaction and unmet hygiene needs.
Failure to Supervise High Fall Risk Resident During Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly monitor and supervise a high fall risk resident, identified as R2, during incontinence care, resulting in a significant accident. R2, a resident with a history of repeated falls, dementia, and other medical conditions, rolled out of bed and suffered a head laceration requiring six sutures. The incident occurred when a CNA, V10, was providing incontinence care and momentarily turned away to grab a new brief, during which time R2 rolled out of bed. Interviews with staff, including a nurse (V6), a restorative nurse (V7), and the Director of Nursing (V8), revealed that R2 was a high fall risk due to poor safety awareness, confusion, and limited mobility. It was noted that bed bolsters, which were part of R2's care plan to prevent falls, were not confirmed to be in place at the time of the incident. The CNA reportedly did not maintain adequate supervision, allowing R2 to roll from the right side to the back and then off the bed, despite being a maximum assist resident. The facility's fall prevention policy emphasizes the importance of maintaining a safe environment and implementing universal fall precautions. However, the incident report and staff interviews suggest that these protocols were not adequately followed, as R2 was not properly monitored or positioned during care. The lack of immediate intervention and the absence of necessary safety measures contributed to the resident's fall and subsequent injury.
Inaccessible Call Light Cords for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that call light cords were within reach for four residents who were reviewed for call light accessibility. Resident 7 was observed lying in bed without a call light cord nearby, and the RN was unable to locate it until it was found under the blanket of the roommate's bed. Resident 8's call light cord was found between the mattress and bed frame, making it inaccessible. Resident 9's call light cord was tangled in the bed frame, also rendering it unreachable. Resident 6's call light cord was wrapped around a lamp on the nightstand and dangling behind it, making it inaccessible. The facility's policy requires that call light cords be accessible to residents who are capable of using them. The staff, including a nurse and the administrator, acknowledged that call light cords should be within easy reach of residents at all times. However, during the observations, the cords were not positioned as required, leading to the deficiency in accommodating the needs and preferences of the residents.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,383 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 26 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Rolling Meadows
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aliya Of Palatine | 1.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Inverness Rehab | 2.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 41 | 0 |
| Lutheran Home For The Aged | 2.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 23 | 0 |
| Little Sisters Of The Poor Of Palatine | 2.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| New Summit Rehabilitation And Healthcare | 3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Pearl Of Rolling Meadows,the.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.