Citations in Illinois
Statistics, citations and compliance trends for long-term care facilities in Illinois.
Statistics for Illinois (Last 12 Months)
Financial Impact (Last 12 Months)
Latest citations in Illinois
A resident with dementia, behavioral disturbances, and dependence for most ADLs sustained an unexplained right elbow dislocation with fracture. Staff noted the elbow was swollen, red, warm, and painful, and the resident was sent out for hospital care, but the injury source was not identified. Review showed no documented care plan for the resident’s combative behaviors or the elbow injury, and the DON, MDS coordinator, and administrator confirmed those plans were absent.
Pain medication was not available for two residents, one resident’s morphine order was not received by the pharmacy and the first dose was delayed for more than a day after admission, and another resident missed several days of Lidocaine patch therapy because the facility ran out of stock. The second resident also had a physician order without a dose listed and a pain CAA that was not carried into the care plan. The resident reported increased back pain and poor sleep without the patch, while family and staff confirmed ongoing pain and missed doses.
Two residents experienced significant medication errors when ordered meds were not available or not administered as prescribed. One resident on hospice went more than 24 hours after admission without ordered Morphine for pain and air hunger, while another resident missed multiple doses of a Lidocaine patch and Mirabegron because the meds were out of stock or not obtained from the pharmacy, with the DON confirming the missed doses and unrelieved pain were significant.
A resident with a TLSO brace and limited mobility developed a worsening buttock pressure ulcer that was not fully assessed, not promptly communicated for treatment changes, and not consistently covered by timely antibiotic therapy while infection and pain were documented. The wound later deteriorated with tunneling, necrotic tissue, and a new coccyx pressure ulcer that progressed to Stage IV with osteomyelitis after hospital transfer. A second resident had pressure-related skin breakdown with delayed wound assessments and treatment orders, no added individualized care plan interventions, and a CNA provided care without gown and gloves despite EBP being in place.
An unlocked medication cart containing numerous loose, unlabeled medications was observed in the facility library, an area accessible to residents, visitors, and staff. The DON confirmed the cart had a broken lock and had been in the library for at least two weeks, while residents and family members stated the library was open to everyone and that the cart could be accessed by anyone nearby.
Menus and Recipes Not Followed: A resident reported that orange juice and milk were not consistently served and that potatoes were sometimes too hard to eat. During meal observations, residents were served items that did not match the posted menu, including a cold tuna sandwich instead of a tuna melt and missing listed sides such as coleslaw and mandarin oranges. The DON and RD stated the kitchen was selecting only one of the listed menu items in some meal categories and that the tuna melt recipe required toasted bread and heating until the cheese melted, which was not done.
Failure to assess and care plan an unexplained elbow injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to assess one resident’s risk for an accident and failed to identify and implement interventions to reduce hazards consistent with the resident’s needs, goals, care plan, and current professional standards. The resident was 95 years old and admitted with diagnoses including dementia with mood disturbance, major depression disorder, anxiety disorder, Alzheimer’s disorder, essential hypertension, overactive bladder, and chronic kidney disease. The resident’s records showed cognitive impairment and dependence on staff for toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, rolling, sitting to lying, and transferring. The resident sustained a right elbow dislocation with a mildly displaced fracture of the tip of the coronoid and olecranon process from an unknown origin. Hospital documentation showed the resident was admitted for the right elbow injury and dementia with behavioral disturbances. Facility notes documented that the resident’s right elbow was observed to be red, swollen, warm, and painful to touch, and an x-ray was ordered. The resident was later sent to the hospital and returned with a splint to the right arm and no weight bearing until follow-up. Staff interviews indicated the resident was combative during care, required two-person assistance, and had a contracted arm, but the injury source could not be identified. Review of the care plan showed no documented behavioral care plan and no documented care plan for the elbow dislocation or related interventions. The administrator, DON, and MDS coordinator all stated there was no care plan for behaviors or the dislocated elbow documented. The facility policy stated that injuries of unknown origin must be promptly assessed, investigated, and addressed through care plan review and interventions to reduce the risk of future injury. The administrator stated the facility could not determine what happened to the resident’s elbow and did not in-service staff regarding the incident.
Pain Medication Not Available and Pain Care Not Addressed
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure pain medication was available for administration for two residents, failed to clarify a physician order for a pain medication dose for one resident, and failed to initiate a care plan for pain that had been triggered on the CAA for one resident. These failures affected two of the three residents reviewed for pain and included one resident receiving hospice comfort-focused care and another resident with chronic back pain and moderate cognitive impairment. One resident was admitted to the facility by ambulance and had a hospice diagnosis of end stage heart failure. The resident had a physician order for Morphine Sulfate concentrate, 10 mg sublingually every hour as needed for pain and/or air hunger, but the July MAR documented no morphine administration on the day of admission. The MAR also included pain monitoring every shift, but no pain monitoring was documented that day. The first documented morphine dose was given about 26 hours after admission. A nursing note documented that the resident’s family requested as-needed pain medication and staff were unable to locate it, and follow-up with hospice and the pharmacy showed the prescriptions had not been received and were pending clarification regarding which pharmacy was to receive the orders. Pharmacy staff later stated the order received did not include morphine. A CNA also observed the resident appearing uncomfortable during repositioning, with grunting on movement. The second resident had diagnoses including lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration with discogenic back pain, functional quadriplegia, muscle wasting and atrophy, and abnormal posture. The resident’s MDS documented moderate cognitive impairment and occasional moderate-severe pain, and the CAA identified pain as a problem to be carried over to the care plan. However, the current care plan did not include a pain category or interventions to direct staff on pain relief. The physician order for Lidocaine External Patch listed application to the affected area once daily for mild pain, but no dose was identified. The MAR and nursing notes showed the Lidocaine patch was not administered for several consecutive days because the facility was out of stock, with one date signed as given in error. During interview, the resident stated the patch had not been applied for several days, that the resident had never refused it, and that without the patch the back pain increased to 7 to 8 out of 10 and interfered with sleep. The resident reported that Tylenol lowered the pain somewhat, but the patch maintained pain at about 2 out of 10. The resident’s family member stated the resident had pain all the time and that the Lidocaine patches helped take the edge off.
Significant medication errors from delayed and missed ordered medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain physician-ordered medications in a timely manner, resulting in significant medication errors for two residents. One resident was admitted to the facility on 7/9/26 under hospice care with end-stage heart failure and had an order for Morphine Sulfate concentrate 10 mg sublingually every hour as needed for pain and/or air hunger. The resident did not receive Morphine on the day of admission, and the first documented dose was not given until 7/10/26 at 1:41 p.m., about 26 hours after admission. The MAR documented 26 potential missed PRN doses, and the resident’s family member and an LPN stated the medication was not available when needed and that the resident had signs of pain during that period. A second resident had orders for a Lidocaine external patch once daily for mild pain and Mirabegron ER 25 mg daily for urinary antispasmodic use. The MAR and nursing notes documented that the Lidocaine patch was not administered for multiple days because it was out of stock, with missed applications documented on 7/26, 7/27, 7/29, and 7/30, and 7/28 signed in error as given. The resident stated the missed patches prevented comfortable sleep. The same resident also missed Mirabegron doses on multiple days because the medication was on order from the pharmacy and not available, with documentation showing missed administration on 7/14, 7/15, 7/16, 7/17, 7/19, 7/20, and 7/21, and one date documented as given in error. The DON confirmed the Lidocaine order did not include a dose and acknowledged the resident missed several doses because the facility ran out of the patches. The DON also confirmed the Mirabegron was not supplied as expected and that the convenience box did not contain that medication. The resident and family member stated the missed medications affected pain control, sleep, and urinary urgency, and the DON stated the quantity of missed doses and unrelieved pain equated to significant medication errors.
Failure to monitor and treat worsening pressure ulcers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure timely antibiotic therapy and wound monitoring for a resident with a worsening left buttock pressure ulcer, and the resident later developed a coccyx pressure ulcer with infection and severe pain. The resident had a recent vertebral fracture, wore a TLSO brace, and had dementia, hypertension, anxiety, depression, and spinal stenosis. The record shows an abrasion to the left buttock was identified, but no Risk Management Assessment or Skin-Other Assessment was completed for that wound, and the assistant director of nursing confirmed the facility was not completing the expected skin assessments. The same resident later developed a right heel wound, and the care plan was not updated with individualized interventions after the wounds were identified. The left buttock wound worsened and was debrided, with odor, moderate purulent drainage, and signs of infection documented. A wound culture was obtained, and an antibiotic order for ciprofloxacin was entered with a scheduled start date, but the medication administration record did not show antibiotic therapy for several days while the wound continued to show infection. The wound culture results were received, but the nurse practitioner stated the results were not reviewed until later, when a different antibiotic was prescribed. The medical director stated staff should have notified the physician when the antibiotic course ended and the wound still showed signs of infection and increased pain. The resident reported significant pain during wound care, and staff notified the ADON. The wound continued to deteriorate, with later documentation of tunneling, necrotic tissue, and a new coccyx pressure ulcer that progressed to Stage IV with osteomyelitis after hospital transfer. The resident’s power of attorney stated the resident was unable to reposition independently and believed repositioning was not consistently completed because it caused pain. The ADON stated the facility could not locate documentation of spinal precautions or movement limitations related to the TLSO brace, and staff acknowledged the resident could only be repositioned slightly with pillow support. The resident was ultimately transferred to the hospital for wound tunneling and possible infection, and the hospital record documented IV antibiotics, wound debridement, and a diagnosis of osteomyelitis associated with a Stage IV sacral pressure ulcer. For the second resident, the record showed pressure-related skin problems on admission and after hospitalization, but wound measurements, wound assessments, and physician notification were not documented until later. Treatment orders for the coccyx and left buttock wounds were not entered until several days after the wounds were identified, and the care plan did not include additional individualized interventions after the wounds were found. The resident was also placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions, but during observation a CNA entered the room and provided care without gown or gloves, and later confirmed PPE should have been worn and that the resident was on EBP.
Unlocked Medication Cart with Unlabeled Medications in Library
Penalty
Summary
Drugs and biologicals were not stored in accordance with accepted professional principles when an unlocked medication cart was observed in the facility library with numerous loose, unlabeled medications in its drawers. The cart was located in an area that the Administrator, Activities Director, residents, and visitors all stated was accessible at all times, and the DON confirmed the cart had a broken lock and had been in the library for at least two weeks, with staff, residents, and visitors having access to the unknown medications. The Medication Storage Policy required drugs and biologicals to be stored in locked compartments and accessible only to authorized staff. The library was observed with the unlocked medication cart while a resident and family member were sitting nearby. Family members and residents stated the library was accessible to residents and visitors, and one family member reported seeing the cart there for about three weeks and finding several unlabeled, loose medications in it. The affected residents identified in the report included a resident with moderate cognitive impairment and diagnoses including anxiety disorder, prior TIA, cerebral infarction without residual deficits, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, vitamin deficiencies, anemia, and depression, as well as cognitively intact residents with diagnoses including diabetes, COPD, CKD, hypertension, pacemaker, and other chronic conditions.
Menus and Recipes Not Followed
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents received nutritionally adequate meals and that standardized recipes were followed. During observation and interview, residents on regular diets were served meals that did not match the menu items listed. At lunch, residents received tuna sandwiches with cheese, potato chips, tomato soup, and chocolate pudding, but none were served creamy coleslaw. The sandwiches were not heated or toasted, and the cheese was not melted. The dietary supervisor stated she chose to serve only one of the listed side items at meals, rather than both items shown on the menu. The dietary supervisor also stated that the menu listed a protein side and a fruit or cold side for breakfast every day, and a vegetable and salad or cold side at lunch and dinner every day, but she selected only one item from those categories to serve. She stated residents were not served orange juice or cereal every day, only when listed on the menu. During breakfast observation, residents were served biscuit with sausage gravy, hot cereal, and hardboiled egg, and none received mandarin oranges even though they were listed on the menu. A resident stated orange juice was not served every day, milk was only served at breakfast when available, and potatoes were sometimes so hard they were inedible. A CNA stated residents complained that potatoes were not cooked through and were crunchy, and she sometimes had to separate out the soft parts when setting up trays. The registered dietitian stated the hard potatoes suggested the cooks were not following the recipe and that the food should be cooked properly and served as listed on the menu. She stated if tuna melt was listed, residents should receive a tuna melt, not a cold tuna fish sandwich. She also stated the menus were not being followed in a way that met nutritional requirements, including adequate servings of fruits or vegetables, starches, and dairy. The facility’s policy stated cycle menus are planned to meet nutritional needs and standardized recipes are to be used in food preparation. The tuna melt recipe provided required toasted bread and heating until the cheese melted and the internal temperature reached 165 degrees F, but the sandwiches observed were prepared cold and stored in the refrigerator without being heated.
Find your facility
Search by name to see its inspection history, citations and penalties — and how to prepare for the next survey.
Get alerted when Immediate Jeopardy citations hit in Illinois — free
You're all set
Compliance trends in Illinois
Data through Jun 2026Comparisons below measure the most recent period Jul 2025 – Jun 2026 against the prior period Jul 2024 – Jun 2025 (two equal 12-month windows). The most recent 1 months are excluded because CMS is still publishing them.
Top tags by month · last 24 months
dashed = still reportingMonthly citation counts for the 5 most-cited tags. The dashed tail is the 1-month reporting lag.
Frequency movers
Biggest change in how often each tag is cited, as a rate per 100 inspections (so it isn't skewed by survey volume): Jul 2025 – Jun 2026 vs the prior period Jul 2024 – Jun 2025. Only tags with at least 20 citations in both periods are shown.
Severity movers
Tags whose average scope/severity shifted the most: Jul 2025 – Jun 2026 vs the prior period Jul 2024 – Jun 2025. The number is the average severity on the A–L scale (A=0…L=11); the letter is the band it falls in. A rise means the same tag is being cited at a more serious level — note the average can move enough to rank here while staying within the same letter. Same 20-citation minimum applies.
Care domain movers
Citations grouped into CFR care domains — F-tags by their §483 regulatory section (CMS State Operations Manual, Appendix PP) — measured as a rate per 100 inspections: Jul 2025 – Jun 2026 vs the prior period Jul 2024 – Jun 2025. Share is the domain's portion of citations this period; avg severity is the mean scope/severity letter and immediate jeopardy the percentage cited at J–L, both over the current period. Domains with at least 20 citations in both periods are shown; the sparkline tracks the last 12 months (left = oldest).
Immediate jeopardies · this period
Citations at the most serious scope/severity — J–L, immediate jeopardy, residents placed at risk of serious harm or death — over Jul 2025 – Jun 2026 vs the prior period Jul 2024 – Jun 2025. "Surveys with an IJ" counts distinct health inspections that had at least one.
Survey activity · by month
faded/dashed = still reportingCitations each month split into complaint-driven (unscheduled, triggered by grievances) vs standard surveys — bars, left axis — with the number of inspections as a line on the right axis. Rising inspections signal more scrutiny; a rising complaint share means more off-cycle surveys. The most recent 1 months are still being reported.
Deficiency-free survey rate
Share of health surveys that found zero deficiencies — the odds of a clean survey. Jul 2025 – Jun 2026 vs the prior period Jul 2024 – Jun 2025; the most recent 1 months are still being reported (dashed).
Penalties · by month
faded = still reportingTotal civil money penalty dollars imposed on the state's facilities each month — how hard the state is enforcing. The most recent 1 months are still being reported, and penalties often lag citations by several months.
Emerging tags
Tags that weren't established last period but surged — an early warning, distinct from movers (which track already-common tags). Criteria: fewer than 20 citations in the prior period, but at least 10 this period and 2.5× their prior volume. The sparkline shows monthly counts over the last 12 months (left = oldest).
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.
