Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Lutheran Home For The Aged during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Medication error rate exceeded the allowed threshold when surveyors found 3 errors in 30 medication opportunities, resulting in a 10% error rate. An LPN administered scheduled meds to a resident with HF, HTN, and COPD outside the expected time window, and the MAR showed the meds were signed as given late. The DON stated meds were expected within a 2-hour window, while facility policy required routine meds to be given within 60 minutes of the scheduled time.
A resident with right-sided hemiplegia and impaired cognition, who required two-person assistance for turning, was left with only one CNA during a bed bath. After water was spilled, making the mattress slippery, the CNA attempted to turn the resident alone, resulting in the resident falling from the bed and sustaining a right patella fracture. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident's care plan required two-person assistance and that the wet surface contributed to the fall.
A resident who is cognitively intact and dependent on two staff for transfers sustained a fractured toe when her foot became caught between the bars of a mechanical lift during a transfer. The resident reported that staff usually guide her feet, but this was not done during the incident, leading to significant pain and bruising. Staff interviews revealed confusion about who performed the transfer and whether proper procedures were followed, and radiology confirmed an acute fracture.
A resident sustained a right leg fracture after being improperly secured and transferred with a mechanical sit-to-stand lift. During the transfer, the resident became unresponsive, the lift malfunctioned, and staff were unable to safely lower her, resulting in her leg coming off the platform and being injured as she was assisted to the floor.
A resident with severe dementia and a known behavior of placing her feet on the floor during wheelchair transport was not provided with adequate supervision or care planning, resulting in a fall and facial injury. Multiple staff and the resident's POA confirmed this longstanding behavior, but the care plan lacked interventions addressing the risk, and the CNA involved was not informed of the resident's tendencies.
A resident with a history of cancer and compression fracture experienced increased pain due to a delay in receiving prescribed morphine, as pharmacy and order issues prevented timely administration. Staff provided Tylenol, which was insufficient for severe pain, and did not contact the physician for alternative pain control, resulting in inadequate pain management until the correct medication was obtained.
A resident's credit card was misappropriated after her niece left it at the nurse's desk in a white envelope. The resident needed the card for transportation to a medical appointment. Despite the niece's description of the nurse who took the envelope, facility staff did not recall receiving it, and unauthorized charges were made on the card. The facility's investigation could not determine how the card was misappropriated.
A resident's credit card went missing after being dropped off at the nurse's desk by her niece. Despite the facility's policy requiring notification to the police within 24 hours for suspected theft, the administrator did not report the incident, as requested by the resident and her niece. Unauthorized charges were later discovered on the card.
A resident with prostate cancer experienced continued pain due to the facility's failure to manage and communicate effectively about his pain medication. Despite a prescription for a Fentanyl patch, the facility did not obtain or administer it promptly, leading to the resident's distress. Communication breakdowns among staff, pharmacy, and the resident's family contributed to the delay, and the resident's scheduled Norco dose was held without explanation.
The facility failed to properly store and label insulin and controlled medications. Insulin pens and vials were not refrigerated or dated, and controlled medications were not double-locked, as required by policy. An RN confirmed the need for refrigeration and dating of insulin, and the ADON emphasized the importance of a two-lock system for controlled substances.
The facility failed to maintain resident dignity by not providing feeding assistance in a dignified manner and not using a catheter dignity bag. A CNA stood over a cognitively impaired resident during feeding, against policy requiring seated assistance. Another resident's catheter bag was visible from the hallway, despite the resident's preference for privacy and facility policy requiring dignity bags.
A facility failed to complete a Level I PASSAR screening for a resident with a serious mental health diagnosis, including major depressive disorder and behaviors like paranoia and hallucinations. The Social Services Director encountered a system error when attempting the screening, and the facility's policy lacked guidance on the PASSAR process.
A resident dependent on staff for grooming and personal hygiene was observed with a disheveled appearance and reported not receiving adequate care. Despite being assessed as needing assistance, the resident had long facial hair and debris under fingernails, and staff interviews revealed inconsistencies in care provision. The care plan was revised to indicate resistance to care only after surveyor observations, and no specific policies on hygiene were provided.
A resident with a recent hip surgery experienced issues with a non-operational wound vacuum, leading to prolonged exposure to wound drainage. The facility failed to have appropriate physician orders and care interventions in place, resulting in the wound vacuum being removed without documented orders. The resident's care plan lacked necessary interventions, and staff were unaware of how to manage the device, highlighting a deficiency in wound care management.
Three residents in a facility experienced deficiencies in pressure ulcer care and prevention. One resident did not receive updated wound care treatment, another had a flattened pressure relief cushion and delayed treatment updates, and a third had an air mattress set incorrectly for their weight, compromising care.
A resident with multiple sclerosis and dysphagia was left unsupervised during meals, despite requiring a pureed diet and supervision to prevent choking. Observations showed the resident eating alone in both the dining room and their room. Staff confirmed the need for supervision, but the facility lacked a policy for supervising residents with swallowing difficulties.
A resident's indwelling urinary catheter bag was improperly handled, being placed on the floor and stepped on, contrary to the facility's infection control policy. The resident, with multiple health issues including urinary retention, had a care plan requiring enhanced precautions. Staff confirmed the catheter bag should not be on the floor to prevent infection.
The facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for residents with surgical wounds and ensure proper PPE use during catheter care. A resident with a hip surgery wound vacuum lacked EBP signage and PPE, while another with a Foley catheter had improper PPE use. Additionally, a resident with a stage 3 pressure wound had no EBP sign or care plan, indicating deficiencies in infection control practices.
The facility failed to prevent and timely identify pressure ulcers in two residents, leading to severe health issues. One resident developed a Stage 4 infected sacral pressure ulcer due to lack of preventive measures, while another resident's unstageable pressure wound was not identified early enough for intervention. The facility's Pressure Injury Prevention Policy was not adequately followed, resulting in these deficiencies.
Two residents experienced unsafe wheelchair transfers due to the facility's failure to use footrests as required by policy. One resident fell and suffered a brain hemorrhage, while another was observed with feet sliding on the floor during transport. Staff interviews confirmed the expectation of using footrests for safety, which was not adhered to.
A resident at high risk for falls slipped and fell on a wet floor after showering because the CNA did not dry the floor before the resident stood up. The RN confirmed the floor was wet, and the facility's policy identifies wet floors as a fall risk factor.
A resident with prostate cancer did not receive ordered chemotherapy drugs due to medication shortages at the facility. The MAR showed multiple instances of unavailability, and staff struggled to obtain the medications through the usual specialty pharmacy. Communication issues and insurance problems were noted, contributing to the deficiency.
A resident with a history of joint replacement and femur fracture fell while attempting to transfer himself from the toilet. A CNA moved the resident back into the wheelchair without waiting for a nurse to assess for injuries, contrary to the facility's policy. The incident occurred during a shift change, delaying the nursing staff's response.
A resident with multiple diagnoses was discharged without necessary medications, despite being told they would be sent home with a few days' worth. The facility had recently changed pharmacies and did not have a policy for discharge medications, leading to a delay in the resident obtaining their medications. The LPN did not verify medication availability with the family, and nursing staff did not attend care plan meetings to discuss medication needs.
Medication Error Rate Exceeded Allowed Threshold
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to keep the medication error rate at 5% or less. Surveyors found 3 medication errors out of 30 medication opportunities, resulting in a 10% medication error rate. During a medication observation on 01/21/2026 at 9:30 AM, an LPN administered Lamotrigine 150 mg, Bumetanide 1 mg, and Carvedilol 6.25 mg to a resident with heart failure, hypertension, and COPD. The physician orders showed Lamotrigine and Carvedilol were scheduled for 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM, and Bumetanide was scheduled for 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM. At 9:45 AM, the LPN stated she was expected to administer medications one hour before or one hour after the scheduled times, and that she was a float nurse who had finished another hall and needed to finish this side, where she had 24 residents on the unit. The facility’s medication administration audit showed the LPN signed the medications at 9:43 AM for medications scheduled for 8:00 AM. The DON stated on 01/22/2026 that medications were expected to be administered within a two-hour window, one hour before and one hour after the scheduled time, and that medications given at 9:30 AM and scheduled for 8:00 AM were considered late. The facility policy dated 01/2025 stated routine medications are administered within 60 minutes of the scheduled time unless otherwise specified.
Failure to Provide Adequate Supervision During Resident Repositioning Resulting in Fall and Fracture
Penalty
Summary
A resident with a history of cerebrovascular accident, right-sided hemiplegia, dysarthria, and right leg pain, who was care planned for impaired cognition, limited mobility, and high fall risk, was not safely repositioned during in-bed care. The resident required staff assistance for turning and bed mobility, including instruction cues and hand guidance. During a bed bath, a CNA was providing care alone when a basin of water was spilled, making the mattress wet and slippery. Despite the resident's inability to use her right side and the increased risk due to the wet surface, the CNA proceeded to turn the resident without additional assistance. As the resident was turned to her right side, she lost her balance and fell from the bed onto the floor. Following the fall, the resident complained of right knee pain, and an X-ray confirmed a mildly displaced fracture of the superior margin of the patella. The resident's care plan and staff interviews confirmed that two staff members were typically required for turning due to her physical limitations. The CNA involved acknowledged that the wet and slippery mattress contributed to the fall and that the resident's previous bed was smaller, which may have increased the risk. The facility's policy identified wet surfaces, cognitive impairment, and poor grip strength as fall risk factors, and the DON stated that a second person should have been called to assist after the water spill.
Failure to Ensure Safe Mechanical Lift Transfer Results in Resident Toe Fracture
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident, who is cognitively intact and dependent on two staff members for transfers, sustained a displaced fracture to her right great toe during a mechanical lift transfer. The resident reported that, during the transfer from her wheelchair to bed, her foot became caught between the center bars of the lift, resulting in significant pain and bruising. The resident stated that staff usually guide her feet during transfers, but on this occasion, her foot was not properly guided, leading to the injury. The incident was not immediately reported to the nurse on duty, and there was confusion among staff regarding who performed the transfer and who was present in the room at the time of the incident. Interviews with staff revealed that the resident requires a full body mechanical sling lift and cannot transfer herself, with the care plan indicating a two-person assist for transfers. However, staff were unable to clearly identify who performed the transfer or if the required number of staff were present. The resident's injury was later confirmed by radiology as an acute, mildly displaced fracture of the right first proximal phalanx, with associated swelling. Documentation and interviews indicated a lack of adequate supervision and failure to ensure safe transfer practices, resulting in the resident's injury.
Resident Fracture Due to Improper Mechanical Lift Transfer
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident was not safely transferred using a mechanical sit-to-stand lift, resulting in the resident sustaining a proximal tibia and fibula fracture of the right leg. The incident began when a CNA was assisting the resident to use the toilet with the lift. After the resident had a large bowel movement, she became unresponsive while being cleaned and transferred. The CNA called for assistance, and additional staff responded. During this time, the lift failed to lower the resident, and the emergency release button was also not functioning. Staff attempted to lower the resident manually while the nurse tried to operate the lift controls. Observations from staff interviews revealed that the resident's right leg was off the platform, the leg strap was either loose or removed, and the resident was not fully secured in the lift. The resident's leg was positioned awkwardly, and staff were concerned about causing further injury while lowering her to the floor. Despite these concerns, the resident was slowly lowered to the ground, during which her right lower leg was bent and under her body. After being placed on the floor, the resident was found to have a bruise and abrasion on her right shin, and subsequent assessment confirmed a fracture. Facility policy and staff statements indicated that residents should be securely fastened in the lift, with straps snugly applied and feet placed flat on the platform. Proper procedure was not followed, as the resident was not adequately secured, and her leg was able to come off the platform. The failure to ensure the resident was safely transferred and properly secured in the mechanical lift directly led to the injury.
Failure to Safely Transport Resident with Known Wheelchair Safety Risk
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to safely transport a resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of putting her feet on the floor while being pushed in a wheelchair. The resident, an eighty-year-old female with severe dementia and agitation, was observed and reported by staff and her power of attorney to frequently place her feet on the ground during wheelchair transport. On one occasion, while being pushed toward the shower room, the resident placed her feet on the floor and fell forward out of the wheelchair, resulting in a laceration above her right eye that required three sutures and caused significant bruising. Multiple staff members, including CNAs and an LPN, confirmed that the resident had a longstanding behavior of putting her feet down during wheelchair movement, both when self-propelling and when being pushed by others. Despite this known behavior, the resident's care plan did not include any interventions or focus on this risk until after the incident. Additionally, the CNA who was pushing the resident at the time of the fall was not made aware of this behavior. The facility's fall prevention policy requires identification and documentation of resident risk factors for falls and the establishment of a resident-centered prevention plan, which was not followed in this case.
Failure to Provide Timely and Adequate Pain Management
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to provide adequate pain management for a female resident with a history of lung cancer and a compression fracture. Upon admission, the resident experienced increased pain, reporting scores as high as 10 out of 10. The resident did not receive her scheduled morphine dose as ordered due to issues with pharmacy delivery and medication order clarification. Instead, she was given Tylenol, which was acknowledged by the physician as inadequate for severe pain. The LPN on duty did not contact the physician to obtain an alternative as-needed pain medication when the morphine was unavailable. The resident's pain was not effectively controlled until several hours after the initial complaint, when the correct morphine medication was finally administered. Documentation and interviews confirmed that the resident's pain was more controlled after receiving the appropriate medication, but she had experienced significant discomfort during the delay. The facility's records and staff interviews corroborated that the delay in obtaining and administering the prescribed narcotic pain medication led to inadequate pain control for the resident during the specified period.
Misappropriation of Resident's Credit Card
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from the misappropriation of her credit card, which was not listed on her inventory list upon admission. The resident, who was cognitively intact and required assistance for daily activities, had requested her niece to drop off her credit card at the facility to pay for transportation to a medical appointment. The niece left the card in a white envelope at the nurse's desk, but the card was never received by the resident, leading to unauthorized charges. The niece described the nurse who took the envelope as wearing burgundy scrubs, two face masks, and glasses, but the facility staff interviewed did not recall receiving the envelope or seeing the niece on the specified date. The facility's electronic log confirmed the niece's brief visit to the facility. Despite the niece's detailed description, the staff could not identify the nurse, and the credit card was used for several unauthorized transactions at local stores and restaurants. The facility's investigation into the incident revealed that the credit card was reported missing by another niece, and the facility's policy on abuse and neglect was reviewed. The policy emphasizes the resident's right to be free from misappropriation of property, but the investigation did not determine how the card was misappropriated. The facility's administrator noted the possibility of the envelope being misplaced or discarded, allowing someone else to find and use the card.
Failure to Report Missing Credit Card to Police
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the police when a resident's credit card went missing and could not be located. The incident involved a resident whose niece reported that she had dropped off a credit card for the resident at the nurse's desk in a white envelope. Despite the resident's initial reluctance to involve the police, the facility's policy required them to report such incidents to local authorities within 24 hours if no serious bodily injury was involved. The administrator acknowledged the situation but did not report the missing credit card to the police, as the resident and her niece requested to hold off on the report. The resident later discovered unauthorized charges totaling $346.87 on her credit card, which were identified by the credit card company's fraud department. The facility's electronic sign-in system confirmed the niece's brief visit to the facility. The facility's policy on abuse and neglect clearly outlined the requirement to report suspected crimes, including theft, to the police and the Department of Public Health. However, this protocol was not followed, resulting in a deficiency in handling the suspected misappropriation of the resident's funds.
Failure in Pain Management and Communication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to effectively manage and communicate regarding a resident's pain management needs, resulting in the resident experiencing continued pain and emotional distress. The resident, who had a history of prostate cancer and other medical conditions, was transferred from a hospital where he was receiving two Norco tablets for pain management. Upon transfer to the facility, his medication was reduced to one Norco tablet, and his pain worsened. Despite a tele-visit with a pain nurse practitioner who prescribed a Fentanyl patch in addition to the Norco, the facility did not obtain or administer the patch in a timely manner. The breakdown in communication and coordination among the facility staff, pharmacy, and the resident's family contributed to the delay in pain management. The resident's spouse attempted to communicate the new prescription to the facility, but the information was not effectively relayed or acted upon by the nursing staff. The pharmacy received the prescription but did not deliver the medication due to a discrepancy in the order quantity, and there was no follow-up communication to resolve the issue promptly. The resident continued to express severe pain and frustration, feeling that his concerns were not being addressed. The facility's staff, including nurses and the assistant director of nursing, acknowledged the communication failures and lack of documentation regarding the resident's pain management. The resident's scheduled Norco dose was also held without proper documentation or explanation, further exacerbating the situation. The facility's pain management policy emphasizes the importance of timely and effective pain management, which was not adhered to in this case.
Improper Storage and Labeling of Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper storage and labeling of insulin and controlled medications for several residents. During an inspection of the 2B unit medication cart, it was found that insulin pens and vials belonging to residents were not refrigerated as required. Specifically, an insulin pen and a multi-dose vial were found in the cart's top drawer, both unopened and labeled to be kept refrigerated. Additionally, opened insulin containers were not labeled with dates, which is necessary to track their expiration. The RN present confirmed that insulin should be refrigerated until opened and dated once opened to ensure it is used within 28 days. Furthermore, the facility did not adhere to the policy of double-locking controlled medications. In the 2B unit medication room, the refrigerator containing multi-dose vials of lorazepam was found unlocked. The RN stated that the refrigerator is typically left unlocked between shifts, and initially, he was unsure if he had the keys to lock it. The Assistant Director of Nurses later confirmed that controlled medications should always be secured with a two-lock system to prevent unauthorized access. The facility's Medication Storage policy also mandates that controlled substances in the refrigerator be secured in a separately locked compartment.
Failure to Maintain Resident Dignity in Feeding and Catheter Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide feeding assistance in a dignified manner for a resident with severe cognitive impairment. During a meal, a CNA stood over the resident while providing feeding assistance, contrary to the facility's policy that requires staff to be seated and make eye contact with residents during feeding. This policy aims to ensure that residents receive assistance with meals in a safe and dignified manner. The Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that standing over residents while assisting them with meals is not considered dignified. Additionally, the facility did not use a catheter dignity bag for a resident whose catheter drainage bag was visible from the hallway. The resident, who was cognitively intact, expressed a preference for privacy regarding his catheter bag. The facility's policy and staff interviews indicated that catheter bags should be covered with dignity bags to maintain resident privacy and dignity. The Assistant Director of Nursing acknowledged that the catheter bag should have been covered or positioned away from the hallway to prevent visibility.
Failure to Complete PASSAR Screening for Resident with Mental Health Diagnosis
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASSAR) for a resident who was admitted with a serious mental health diagnosis. The resident, identified as R77, was admitted with a history of major depressive disorder and exhibited behaviors such as paranoia, hallucinations, and wandering. The care plan for R77 indicated the use of psychotropic medications for behavior management and depression. Despite these indicators, the necessary PASSAR screening was not completed upon the resident's admission or readmission following hospitalization. The Social Services Director, identified as V4, attempted to complete the Level I PASSAR screen but encountered a system error. V4 acknowledged that the hospital typically conducts the screening before admission, but if not done, it was her responsibility to complete it. The facility's policy on the referral and admission process did not include information related to the PASSAR screening process, indicating a gap in the facility's procedures for ensuring compliance with PASSAR requirements.
Failure to Assist Resident with Daily Living Activities
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary assistance with activities of daily living for a resident, identified as R166, who was assessed to be dependent on staff for grooming and personal hygiene. R166, who has a medical history including cerebral infarction, dementia, and anxiety disorder, was observed multiple times over several days with a disheveled appearance, long facial hair, and debris under her fingernails. Despite being dependent on staff for showering and personal hygiene, R166 reported not receiving a bed bath since the previous Sunday and no recent assistance with oral hygiene. The care plan for R166 indicated a preference to stay in bed but did not document any resistance to care. Interviews with facility staff revealed inconsistencies in the provision of care. A registered nurse stated that R166 receives weekly bed baths and daily grooming, but also mentioned that refusals of care should be documented, which was not found in the progress notes. A certified nursing assistant assigned to R166 did not mention providing grooming or hygiene care beyond changing linens and checking for skin issues. The clinical educator confirmed that residents should receive daily hygiene care, including grooming and shaving, but acknowledged that R166's care plan was revised to indicate resistance to care only after the surveyor's observations. The facility's policy on activities of daily living was not adhered to, and no specific policies on bathing, grooming, or personal hygiene were provided upon request.
Failure to Ensure Proper Wound Vacuum Operation and Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper operation and care of a wound vacuum for a resident who had undergone left hip surgery. The resident, who was cognitively intact, reported being wet under her left buttocks, and it was observed that the wound vacuum was not operational, with the fluid collection chamber appearing dry and empty. The resident's clothing was soaked due to the surgical site draining, and the wound vacuum was found disconnected after a therapy session. The staff, including a CNA and an RN, were unaware of how long the device had been non-functional, and there were no scheduled orders for the surgical site care. The resident's progress notes indicated that the wound vacuum's battery was dead upon admission, and there was no charger available. Despite this, the treatment administration record documented that the wound vacuum placement and functioning were checked twice daily, even on the day it was found not operating. The wound care nurse confirmed the absence of treatment orders for the surgical wound site and acknowledged the importance of having such orders to ensure wound healing and reduce infection risk. The Director of Nurses stated that physician care orders should be in place within 24 hours of admission, and a baseline care plan should be completed within 48 hours. The facility's failure to have appropriate physician orders and care interventions in place for the resident's surgical site care led to the deficiency. The wound vacuum was removed without any documented orders, and the care plan lacked interventions related to the surgical site or wound vacuum use. This oversight resulted in the resident experiencing prolonged exposure to wound drainage, which could potentially delay healing and increase the risk of infection.
Deficiencies in Pressure Ulcer Care and Prevention
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper pressure ulcer care and prevention for three residents, leading to deficiencies in treatment and care. Resident R197 was observed with a flat pillow under his calves, failing to offload his heels as required. Despite having a stage 3 pressure wound on his right heel, the treatment orders were not updated in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) following a change by the wound care physician. The resident did not receive the correct wound care treatment, as the orders for calcium alginate were not implemented, and his heels were not consistently offloaded as per the care plan. Resident R280 had a stage 3 pressure ulcer on his right inner buttock, but the pressure relief cushion in his wheelchair was flattened, compromising its effectiveness. The treatment orders for his pressure ulcer were not updated promptly in the physician orders, resulting in a delay of five days before the correct treatment was administered. The wound care physician's orders for foam silicone border dressing were not followed, and the resident continued to receive the previous treatment of calcium alginate and foam dressing. Resident R466, who was admitted with a stage 3 pressure wound to the sacrum, had an air mattress set to the maximum weight of 400 pounds, despite weighing only 110 pounds. The air mattress was not adjusted to the resident's weight, which is crucial for promoting healing and preventing further skin breakdown. The facility's failure to verify and adjust the air mattress settings as per the resident's weight contributed to the deficiency in care.
Failure to Supervise Resident with Dysphagia During Meals
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a resident with difficulty swallowing, identified as R8, during meal times. R8 has multiple diagnoses, including multiple sclerosis and dysphagia, which necessitate a pureed diet and supervision while eating to prevent choking. Despite these needs, observations revealed that R8 was left unsupervised during meals on multiple occasions. On one occasion, R8 was in the dining room without any nursing staff present, and on other occasions, R8 was alone in his room while eating. Interviews with facility staff, including a Licensed Practical Nurse, a Diet Technician, and the Assistant Director of Nurses, confirmed that R8 requires supervision during meals due to the risk of choking. The staff acknowledged that R8 should be eating in the dining room where supervision is available. However, the facility was unable to provide any policy related to the supervision of residents with dysphagia, indicating a lack of formal guidelines to ensure the safety of residents with swallowing difficulties.
Improper Handling of Catheter Bag Leads to Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper handling of a resident's indwelling urinary catheter bag, which was observed on the floor and stepped on by the resident. During an observation, a CNA was seen picking up the catheter drainage bag from the floor, threading it through the resident's pants, and placing it back on the floor. The resident, who was sitting on the toilet, had her right foot stepping on the catheter drainage bag. After assisting the resident to stand and cleaning her, the CNA placed the drainage bag in a dignity bag under the wheelchair, but it was initially left on the floor. The resident, identified as having multiple diagnoses including congestive heart failure, neuropathy, and urinary retention, had a care plan that required enhanced barrier precautions for the indwelling catheter. The facility's policy on catheter care emphasized that the catheter and tubing should be kept off the floor to prevent infection. Interviews with nursing staff confirmed that the catheter bag should not be on the floor due to infection control concerns, as the floor is not considered clean.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions and Proper PPE Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for residents with surgical wounds and ensure proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during catheter care. Resident R371, who had undergone left hip surgery, was observed without any signage or PPE bin outside her room, indicating a lack of EBP. Staff members, including a CNA and an RN, were seen providing care to R371 while only wearing gloves, despite the presence of a wound vacuum indicating a draining wound. The facility's policy required gowns and gloves during high-contact activities, but this was not adhered to. Resident R291, who had a Foley catheter, was also not provided with appropriate PPE during care. A CNA was observed handling the catheter drainage bag without wearing a gown, and the bag was placed on the floor, which is against the facility's EBP policy. Although there was an EBP sign outside R291's room, the CNA was unaware of the requirement to wear a gown, indicating a lack of proper training or communication regarding infection control protocols. Resident R197, with a stage 3 pressure wound on the right heel, did not have an EBP sign posted outside his room, and there was no care plan in place for EBP. The wound care nurse confirmed the absence of the sign, and the resident's care plan did not include EBP measures. The facility's failure to implement and communicate EBP protocols for residents with wounds and devices led to deficiencies in infection prevention and control practices.
Failure to Prevent and Identify Pressure Ulcers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement necessary interventions to prevent pressure ulcers and did not identify a pressure ulcer in a timely manner for two residents, leading to significant health issues. Resident 1 (R1) was admitted without any pressure wounds but was identified as being at high risk for developing them. Despite this, R1's care plan did not include interventions for pressure injury prevention. Over time, R1 developed a Stage 3 sacral pressure wound, which later merged with another wound and progressed to an infected Stage 4 pressure ulcer with necrotic tissue and infection by E. coli and Morganella morganii. Resident 3 (R3) was admitted with a history of pressure ulcers and was assessed as being at very high risk for developing new ones. Initially, R3's sacrum was clear, but later notes indicated moisture-associated skin damage, which was not considered a pressure injury. Eventually, R3 developed an unstageable sacral pressure wound with significant necrotic tissue. The wound care doctor noted that the wound was severe and should have been identified earlier when it was just redness, allowing for earlier intervention. The facility's Pressure Injury Prevention Policy requires the wound team to manage wound care and implement prevention interventions, with regular assessments and documentation. However, these protocols were not followed, as evidenced by the lack of timely identification and intervention for the pressure ulcers in both residents. The wound care nurse acknowledged the need for a care plan that includes pressure injury prevention measures, such as frequent turning, especially for residents with limited mobility and incontinence.
Failure to Ensure Safe Wheelchair Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure safe transfers for two residents, leading to significant incidents. One resident, identified as R1, was admitted with multiple diagnoses including dementia and was at moderate risk for falls. On a specific date, R1 fell from her wheelchair while being propelled by a CNA, resulting in a brain hemorrhage. The incident occurred because R1 impulsively put her feet down while being wheeled without footrests, which were not applied despite the care plan indicating their necessity for safety during transport. Another resident, R3, also experienced unsafe wheelchair transport. R3, who had a history of falls and was at high risk due to confusion and weakness, was observed being pushed in a wheelchair without leg rests. This resulted in R3's feet sliding against the floor, indicating a lack of adherence to safety protocols for wheelchair transport. The facility's policy required the use of footrests during wheelchair transport to prevent accidents, but this was not followed in both cases. Staff interviews confirmed the expectation that footrests should be used for safety, yet they were not applied, contributing to the accidents involving R1 and R3.
Failure to Prevent Resident Fall Due to Wet Floor
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that slippery wet floors were dried prior to safely transferring a resident after showering, leading to an accident. A certified nursing assistant (CNA) was asked to give a shower to a female resident who was at high risk for falls due to her medical conditions, including metabolic encephalopathy, cerebral infarction, unsteadiness on feet, difficulty walking, and hypertension. During the shower, the CNA did not dry the floor before the resident stood up, resulting in the resident slipping on the wet floor and falling. The incident was corroborated by another CNA who mentioned the importance of drying the floor to prevent falls. The registered nurse (RN) who attended to the resident after the fall confirmed that the floor was wet and that the resident was not very steady when standing. The facility's final report documented the resident's statement that the floor was very soapy and wet, causing her feet to slip. The facility's Falls and Post-Falls Management Policy identifies wet floors as an environmental factor contributing to fall risks.
Failure to Provide Chemotherapy Drugs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide ordered chemotherapy drugs for a resident diagnosed with prostate cancer, among other conditions. The resident's medication administration record (MAR) indicated multiple instances where the chemotherapy drugs, abiraterone acetate and Orgovyx, were not available over several months. The resident's guardian was informed of the medication shortages, and it was noted that the facility's staff did not have a clear process for obtaining these medications, which were typically ordered through a specialty pharmacy. The Memory Care Manager and the resident's temporary guardian were involved in addressing the medication shortages. The temporary guardian was informed by a floor nurse that the facility was running out of the resident's chemotherapy medications. Despite efforts to communicate with the guardian and the specialty pharmacy, there were delays in obtaining the necessary medications. The facility's registered nurse (RN) also reported difficulties in acquiring the medications and noted a lack of information on how the facility should obtain them. The resident's primary guardian mentioned that the chemotherapy medications were not an issue until the resident moved from the assisted living side to the long-term care side of the facility. The primary guardian also highlighted that there were issues with the resident's insurance, which may have contributed to the medication shortages. The facility's policies on medication administration and physician order entry were referenced, indicating that medications should be administered as ordered by a physician.
Failure to Assess Resident Before Moving After Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to assess a resident prior to being moved off the floor after a fall. The resident, who had a history of joint replacement, femur fracture, sepsis, and urinary tract infection, required substantial to maximal assistance for toilet transfers. On the morning of the incident, a CNA assisted the resident onto the toilet and left the resident alone with the call light nearby. The resident attempted to transfer himself and fell, resulting in the CNA finding him on the bathroom floor. Despite the resident's discomfort and attempts to get up, the CNA moved the resident back into the wheelchair without waiting for a nurse to assess the resident for injuries, as required by the facility's policy on fall prevention and post-falls management. The CNA then informed an occupational therapist, who subsequently notified an LPN. The LPN assessed the resident only after the resident had already been moved back into the wheelchair by the CNA, contrary to the facility's policy that residents should not be moved until assessed by a nurse to rule out significant injuries. Interviews with the occupational therapist, the LPN, the therapy director, the assistant director of nurses, and a nurse practitioner confirmed that the facility's policy was not followed. The policy mandates that residents who have fallen or are found on the floor without a witness should be assessed for injuries before being moved. The failure to adhere to this policy was acknowledged by the staff, who stated that moving a resident before an assessment could potentially cause more injury. The incident occurred during a shift change, which may have contributed to the delay in the nursing staff's response.
Failure to Ensure Continuity of Medications for Discharged Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure continuity of medications for a resident being discharged to home. The resident, who had multiple diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, acute kidney failure, diabetes type II, and depression, was discharged without any medications despite being told that they would be sent home with a few days' worth of medications. The resident's family had to go to the pharmacy to pick up the medications, which were not available immediately, leading to a delay of 2 to 3 days in obtaining the necessary medications. The medications that were not available included atorvastatin, gabapentin, glipizide, metoprolol, and citalopram. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) responsible for the discharge did not check with the family to ensure they had sufficient medications prior to the discharge. The facility had recently changed pharmacies, and the new pharmacy did not provide pill packs that could be sent home with the resident. The Director of Nursing (DON) and Assistant DON acknowledged that the facility did not have a policy regarding discharge medications for the new pharmacy. Additionally, nursing staff did not attend the care plan meetings where medications should have been discussed, leading to a lack of communication and planning for the resident's medication needs post-discharge.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,339 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 26 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Arlington Hts
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Summit Rehabilitation And Healthcare | 0.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Pearl Of Rolling Meadows,the | 2.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Moorings Of Arlington Heights | 2.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Aliya Of Palatine | 2.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Little Sisters Of The Poor Of Palatine | 3.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Lutheran Home For The Aged.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.