Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Lemont Nursing & Rehab Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Kitchen sanitation, food storage, and dishwashing failures: The facility failed to keep food service areas clean and properly monitored, with dirty and uncovered equipment, missing temperature and sanitizer logs, and a dish machine that did not reach the required wash and rinse temperatures. Staff also left food items unlabeled, undated, open to air, or stored with scoops, cups, and other contamination sources, while personal items were kept in storage areas and several dented cans were present.
The facility failed to provide the required annual CNA competency training, including dementia management education. The HR Director and DON both stated they did not know the required yearly training hours or mandatory topics, and CNA files and orientation records showed no dementia-specific in-service documentation. CNAs said they did not track their own annual training hours, while the facility had many residents with dementia or Alzheimer’s diagnoses.
A resident with a stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer, dementia, and dysphagia did not receive key elements of ordered pressure ulcer management, including consistent offloading, correct specialty mattress settings, and prescribed nutritional supplements. Over an extended observation period, staff entered the room for care tasks but did not reposition the resident to offload the wound, while the WCC stated that an alternating-pressure mattress replaced the need for manual turning and repositioning. The mattress remained incorrectly set for a significantly higher weight than the resident’s documented weight despite orders to verify settings each shift, and electronic records showed numerous missed doses of an ordered arginine supplement intended to support wound healing, even as the wound physician documented deterioration and stressed the need for offloading and high-protein nutrition.
A resident with dehydration, DM, a stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer, dementia, dysphagia, and documented unintended weight loss had physician orders for a NAS/LCS mechanical soft diet with double portions, Mighty Shakes at breakfast and lunch, Med Pass BID, and HS snacks, and was care planned to need partial to moderate assistance with eating. Observations showed the resident repeatedly received regular portions without the ordered supplements, and a CNA stated feeding assistance was unnecessary despite the care plan. The resident’s family reported ongoing concerns about weight loss, lack of feeding assistance, and missing supplements, and supplied their own protein shake when the facility did not provide it. The resident was subsequently hospitalized with a diagnosis of failure to thrive and severe malnutrition with muscle wasting, confirmed by a hospital RN.
Two residents with pacemakers did not have physician orders in place for pacemaker checks, and the electronic record lacked key device details such as the pacemaker type, model or serial number, programmed pulse rate, and check frequency. One resident’s care plan mentioned a pacemaker but did not specify the type, and the other resident had no pacemaker-specific care plan or interventions. Staff reported uncertainty about pacemaker monitoring responsibilities, and the DON stated one resident had not had a pacemaker check since admission.
Failure to ensure timely podiatry foot care. A resident with DM, insulin use, morbid obesity, and a chronic leg ulcer reported asking to see Podiatry for toenail trimming, but her long, thick, uneven toenails remained uncut and caused pain when bedding caught on them. Staff said requests were to be routed through Social Services for the podiatry list, but the resident was not listed on the facility’s running podiatry log or the list of residents seen since 8/2025, despite the DON stating residents should be seen at least every 3 months and diabetic residents more often.
Failure to provide proper Foley catheter and perineal care for a resident with an indwelling catheter and bowel incontinence. A CNA was observed providing incontinence care without cleansing the catheter, tubing, or insertion site after a bowel movement, and wiped the scrotal area upward instead of front to back. The resident had diagnoses including sepsis, UTI, BPH, and obstructive uropathy, with orders and a care plan for catheter care every shift and as needed.
Unsecured Medications Left in Resident Room: Surveyors observed nystatin topical powder and Zinc Oxide Paste left on a resident’s dresser and still present on a later observation. The resident had CHF, COPD, dementia, and moderate cognitive impairment, and the Wound Care Nurse stated there were no orders to leave the meds at bedside. The DON stated meds should not be left unsecured because another resident could accidentally take them and they could be used incorrectly.
A facility failed to provide a resident's Advance Directives to paramedics and the hospital during a transfer. The resident, who was cognitively intact and wished to remain DNR, was transferred due to shortness of breath. The LPN responsible for the transfer did not include the POLST form, and the facility's policy did not require it. The resident's daughter later requested the form be sent, highlighting the oversight.
A resident with a history of UTIs experienced a delay in urine specimen collection, leading to a confirmed UTI at urgent care. Despite a lab order placed, the urinalysis was not transcribed promptly, and the initial specimen was contaminated. The resident's family took her to urgent care, where the UTI was confirmed, and she returned with an IV line.
A resident with swallowing difficulties and significant weight loss was not provided a physician-ordered pureed diet, receiving a mechanical soft diet instead. The dietary change was delayed due to communication issues between nursing and dietary staff, and the facility lacked a policy for diet order implementation.
A resident with multiple health issues, including stage 4 pressure ulcers and cerebral palsy, was found in a neglected state, with greasy hair, unkempt nails, and food remnants on their body. The resident, dependent on staff for all ADLs, was on contact isolation for MRSA. A CNA from an agency, unfamiliar with the resident's care, acknowledged the hygiene issues. The DON confirmed that CNAs are responsible for daily hygiene care, but the facility failed to meet the resident's needs.
A resident with swallowing difficulties and significant weight loss was not provided with a physician-ordered pureed diet due to a communication breakdown between nursing and dietary staff. The resident was served a mechanical soft diet, which posed a risk of aspiration, despite the diet change being documented in the electronic medical records.
The facility failed to maintain proper food storage and sanitation practices, risking foodborne illness for 128 residents. Observations revealed improper storage of opened food items, lack of labeling and dating, and inadequate sanitation practices. Dented cans, dirty equipment, and incomplete logs further highlighted the facility's non-compliance with its policies.
The facility failed to provide adequate grooming and hygiene care for residents requiring assistance, as observed in five residents with cognitive and physical impairments. These residents were found with long, dirty fingernails and inadequate oral care, despite facility policies emphasizing routine cleaning and trimming. The DON acknowledged that CNAs are responsible for these tasks, but they were not being performed as required.
A facility failed to securely store controlled substances and allowed unauthorized bedside storage of medications. Narcotics were found in unlocked refrigerators, and some residents had medications at their bedside without proper orders or assessments. The facility's policies require secure storage and authorized access, which were not followed, posing potential risks to resident safety.
The facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices, with staff not adhering to Enhanced Barrier Precautions and contact isolation protocols. Instances included care provided without necessary PPE due to unavailability, and inadequate hand hygiene practices. These deficiencies were observed in residents requiring EBP and contact isolation, highlighting systemic issues with PPE availability and protocol adherence.
Two residents experienced breaches in privacy and dignity during care activities. A resident with cognitive impairment was left exposed with an open door during bathing, while another resident's urine collection bag was visible, and he was left uncovered during care. The facility's guidelines on resident privacy were not followed.
The facility failed to provide written notification to residents and their families regarding hospital transfers and did not notify the ombudsman. Three residents were transferred for various medical conditions without proper written documentation or communication of the facility's bed hold policy. The DON acknowledged the lack of compliance with notification requirements.
The facility failed to provide written documentation of the bed hold policy to residents or their representatives during hospital transfers. In three cases, residents were transferred to the hospital without receiving the required documentation, and the facility also did not notify the ombudsman of these transfers. The DON acknowledged the lack of written documentation, despite the facility's policy requiring it.
The facility failed to ensure accurate MDS assessments for two residents, leading to deficiencies in documenting functional limitations in range of motion (ROM). A male resident with cerebral infarction and hemiplegia was observed with a contracted right hand, yet his MDS documented no impairment in ROM. Similarly, a female resident was observed with contracted hands, but her MDS also failed to reflect any functional limitation in ROM. The MDS Coordinator and DON acknowledged the inaccuracies.
A resident's nephrostomy dressing was not changed daily as ordered, leading to a deficiency in care. The resident's daughter noticed the dressing was dated five days earlier, and the wound nurse did not change it despite it being loose. The DON confirmed the expectation for daily dressing changes to prevent infection.
The facility failed to implement fall interventions for two residents at risk for falls. One resident's bed was not secured, causing it to move during transfers, and the safety ring was not properly attached. Another resident was observed without proper footwear, increasing the risk of falls. Both residents had a history of falls and their care plans required specific interventions that were not followed.
The facility failed to conduct required gradual dose reductions (GDR) for psychotropic medications for two residents. One resident with multiple mental health diagnoses did not receive a GDR in October 2024, and there was no behavior monitoring documentation due to an EMR system change. Another resident with psychosis, major depression, and anxiety disorder did not have any GDR attempts since the psychiatrist retired, and lacked signed medication consent forms.
Two residents in the facility were administered incorrect medication dosages, resulting in a 7.14% error rate. An LPN gave one resident double the prescribed Potassium Chloride, while another resident received more Vitamin D3 than ordered. The errors were due to discrepancies in medication orders and a failure to adhere to the facility's medication administration policy.
A resident was found with a malfunctioning bed control that had exposed and broken wires, posing a safety risk. The DON acknowledged the issue, emphasizing the potential for shock or malfunction. Facility policy requires immediate reporting of unsafe equipment.
The facility failed to serve meals at scheduled times, affecting all 129 residents. Observations and resident interviews revealed consistent delays in meal services, with lunch and dinner being served hours late. Staffing issues and lack of adherence to the facility's mealtime policy were identified as contributing factors.
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen, affecting all 129 residents. Observations included dirty rags, grime, and debris in the dish machine area, improperly stored clean dishes, and a disorganized dry storage area. Additionally, improper dishwashing practices and contamination during pureed meal preparation were noted, indicating a failure to follow the facility's sanitation and infection control policies.
The facility failed to provide adequate grooming and hygiene care for four residents who require assistance with ADLs. Observations revealed long dirty fingernails, overgrown facial hair, uncombed greasy hair, and foul odors. Staff interviews and documentation confirmed that scheduled grooming and hygiene care were not consistently provided.
The facility failed to serve the correct portions of mechanical soft fish as specified in the menu spreadsheet. Residents received 2 + 2/3 oz per serving instead of the required 5 + 1/3 oz, and did not receive gravy with their fish. The cook on duty was unaware of the menu spreadsheet and used the incorrect scoop size due to the unavailability of the correct #6 scoop.
The facility failed to follow standard infection control practices during incontinence care and when entering isolation rooms. CNAs did not perform proper hand hygiene or change gloves between tasks, and housekeeping staff did not wear required PPE when cleaning isolation rooms, despite clear signage. This affected multiple residents on contact isolation for infections such as MRSA and VRE.
The facility failed to document that influenza and pneumococcal vaccines were offered to five residents, despite their medical histories and the facility's policies. This includes residents with conditions such as cerebral infarction, pneumonia, and heart failure, who had no records of being offered or receiving the vaccines since admission.
A resident with multiple diagnoses and a physician's order for hydrocodone-acetaminophen experienced severe pain due to the facility's failure to provide timely medication and notify the physician. The resident reported high pain levels and was unable to eat, but staff did not take prompt action to address the issue.
The facility failed to monitor and document the clinical condition of a resident upon returning from dialysis and did not provide clinical documentation during dialysis treatment. The resident had no physician orders for dialysis or monitoring the dialysis access shunt site, and the facility did not receive or follow up on reports from the dialysis company. Additionally, there was no documentation of post-dialysis assessments in the resident's medical record.
The facility failed to identify the diagnosis and specific behavior for residents prescribed antipsychotic medication. Three residents were observed to have no documented behaviors justifying the use of Quetiapine, and their care plans did not target any specific behaviors or diagnoses for the medication. Staff and the Medical Director confirmed the lack of psychiatric evaluations and documentation.
A facility failed to ensure proper medication administration when an agency nurse attempted to give a resident insulin belonging to another resident. The nurse did not follow the facility's policy, which mandates a triple check of the five rights during medication preparation and administration.
The facility failed to provide substitute meals with the same nutrient content for three residents. The menu listed Lemon Baked Fish with 2 ounces of protein, but the substitute grilled cheese sandwiches were made with insufficient cheese, not meeting the required protein content.
Kitchen sanitation, food storage, and dishwashing failures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a manner that prevents food borne illness, affecting all 135 residents receiving dietary services. During the kitchen tour, the stove had a facility pan with brown gravy covered in plastic wrap over an open flame, two areas of the kitchen were being used to prep food, and only one red sanitation bucket was in use. The red sanitization bucket tested at 0 ppm, and no logs were available for refrigerators, coolers, red buckets, the three-compartment sink, or the dishwasher. The dishwasher was observed dirty inside and out, with the mint-colored flaps caked with a thick tan substance. Test strips used for the dishwasher turned orange at 160 degrees, while the wash dial reached a maximum of 150 degrees Fahrenheit and the rinse dial reached a maximum of 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Staff stated the dish machine temperatures had not been logged in weeks, the sanitizer level of the three-compartment sink had not been logged in over three weeks, and red bucket logs had never been done. The Dietary Manager stated the dishwasher had not reached 180 degrees Fahrenheit since she started working in the facility and said the dishes were still safe to use if the test strip turned orange at 160 degrees Fahrenheit. The mixer, meat slicer, tomato slicer, toaster oven, utensils on an open cart, and two drawers containing utensils were dirty and uncovered. In dry storage, personal winter coats were hanging on storage racks, and multiple food items were unlabeled, undated, or stored with scoops, cups, parchment paper, or garbage-bag liners. Several cans were dented. In the walk-in cooler and freezer, food items were open to air, poorly wrapped, unlabeled, undated, or stored without lids, and the floor had crumbs and an orange spill. The Dietary Manager stated that equipment should be cleaned and covered, personal belongings should not be kept in the kitchen, food items should be labeled and dated, scoops and cups should not be stored in food bins, dented cans should be discarded, and exposed foods should not be left open to air.
Missing CNA Annual Competency and Dementia Training
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide the required 12 hours per year of continuing competence training for Certified Nursing Assistants, including dementia management training. During interviews, the Human Resources Director stated the Director of Nursing was responsible for CNA in-service trainings and competencies, but she did not know who tracked annual CNA hours, how many hours were required, or which mandatory trainings had to be included. The DON also stated she did not know how many training hours CNAs were supposed to have each year or what the mandatory CNA trainings were. Review of the CNA orientation packet showed no evidence of dementia-related in-services, and a sample review of five CNA personnel files showed no documentation of dementia-specific training. CNAs stated they did not keep track of their own annual training hours. The facility’s diagnosis report showed 87 current residents with diagnoses of dementia and/or Alzheimer’s disease, and the Administrator stated the facility did not have a specific policy regarding staff education requirements and followed the regulation.
Failure to Implement Comprehensive Pressure Ulcer Management Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to implement key components of a comprehensive pressure ulcer management plan for a resident admitted with a stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer, dementia, and dysphagia. The resident required total assistance with bed mobility and was to be turned and repositioned in bed as necessary, but during an observation period of over two hours, staff were seen entering the room for perineal care, linen removal, blood sugar checks, and wound care without evidence of repositioning to offload the sacral wound. The resident’s niece reported that the resident had not been positioned to offload the wound during that shift and stated that the Wound Care Coordinator (WCC) had told her manual turning was unnecessary due to the alternating-pressure mattress. The WCC confirmed that belief, stating that residents on alternating-pressure mattresses do not require manual turning every two hours and that the mattress takes the place of manual turning, repositioning, and offloading, despite the facility Kardex indicating the need for turning and repositioning. The facility also failed to ensure proper use and monitoring of the resident’s specialty mattress and nutritional supplement ordered to support wound healing. The alternating-pressure mattress was observed on three consecutive days to be set for a 160 lb person, while the resident’s most recent documented weight was 125.6 lbs, even though the physician order required staff to check and ensure mattress settings matched the resident’s weight each shift. The mattress manufacturer’s manual specified that the system is intended for prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers when used with a comprehensive pressure ulcer management program and did not state that it replaces offloading, manual turning, or repositioning. Additionally, the resident’s physician orders included an arginine powder nutritional supplement three times daily since admission, but electronic medication records showed 75 missed doses documented as not available or awaiting pharmacy delivery. A prior wound assessment by the wound physician documented deterioration of the lower back wound, including new undermining, watery drainage, pale granulation tissue, and less organized wound base, and emphasized the imperative need for continued offloading and supervision of high-protein nutrition.
Failure to Provide Ordered Double Portions and Nutritional Supplements
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide ordered therapeutic nutrition interventions, including double portions and prescribed nutritional supplements, to a resident with multiple high-risk diagnoses. The resident was admitted with dehydration, diabetes mellitus, a stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer, dementia, dysphagia, and was care planned as needing partial to moderate assistance with eating due to an ADL self-care deficit. Physician orders specified a NAS/LCS mechanical soft diet with Mighty Shakes at breakfast and lunch with double portions, Med Pass twice daily, and bedtime snacks, as well as notification of the primary physician for significant weight changes. The facility’s policy on Interventions for Unintended Weight Loss required identification and monitoring of individuals with unintended or insidious weight loss so that appropriate interventions could be implemented. On multiple observations, the resident did not receive the ordered double portions or nutritional supplements, and staff did not provide the level of feeding assistance identified in the care plan. During breakfast and lunch observations, the resident’s meal trays lacked the ordered supplements, and the entrees were served as regular portions instead of double portions. The resident’s niece reported repeated concerns to staff about the resident’s weight loss and stated that staff were not assisting with feeding, not providing double portions, and not supplying ordered nutritional supplements; she also indicated that the protein shake at the bedside was brought in by family and that a milkshake ordered with breakfast was not provided. A CNA stated there was no need to assist the resident with feeding because he was independent, which conflicted with the care plan indicating a need for partial to moderate assistance. The resident was later hospitalized with an admitting diagnosis of failure to thrive and severe malnutrition with muscle wasting, which was confirmed by the hospital RN.
Missing pacemaker orders and monitoring documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents with pacemakers had physician orders in place for pacemaker monitoring and that those orders were carried out for two residents, R4 and R93. R4’s room had a pacemaker monitor with a green light on the nightstand, but her POS did not include an order for pacemaker checks, and the electronic record did not show the pacemaker type, model or serial number, programmed pulse rate, or how often checks were to be completed. Her care plan noted a pacemaker related to atrial fibrillation and dysrhythmias, but did not specify the pacemaker type in the designated area. An LPN stated she knew R4 had a pacemaker but did not know the settings, model, or frequency of checks, and said the model and serial number had been documented previously but she did not know where to find that information in the new documentation system. R93 was observed asleep with a pacemaker monitor device on her nightstand, not lit up, but her POS also lacked an order for pacemaker checks and the electronic record did not show the pacemaker type, model or serial number, programmed pulse rate, or how often checks were to be completed. Her care plan did not include pacemaker-specific care or interventions. An RN stated she was not sure what the nurse’s role was when a resident has a pacemaker and did not know how often checks were done, while the DON stated both residents needed physician orders for pacemaker checks and should be care planned for pacemaker care. The DON also stated R93 had not had a pacemaker check completed since admission and noted the facility had forms documenting the pacemaker model that had not yet been uploaded into the electronic medical record.
Failure to Ensure Timely Podiatry Foot Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident was seen by Podiatry for foot care needs. R10, who had diagnoses including morbid obesity, a non-pressure chronic ulcer of the left lower leg, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and long-term use of insulin, told staff she had asked in November to be seen by a podiatrist to have her toenails cut. On observation, her toenails were long, thick, and uneven, measuring about a quarter inch to half inch above the tips of her toes. R10 said the long toenails caused her pain when her sheet or blanket got stuck on them, and she stated the last time her toenails were cut was before admission when a podiatrist came to her home every 2 months. R10 later said she told her nurse again a few days before the survey that she needed her toenails cut, and the nurse told her she had to wait until the podiatrist came around again and made rounds. Staff stated that when a resident requests podiatry, nurses notify Social Services to add the resident to the podiatry list, and Social Services coordinates the visit when the podiatrist comes to the facility. The Social Service Director said the podiatrist comes 2-3 times a month and sees every resident at least every 3 months, but R10 was not listed on the running podiatry list or the list of residents seen since 8/2025. The DON stated every resident should be seen by Podiatry at least every 3 months, and diabetic residents more frequently, and said it is not appropriate for a diabetic resident to go over 4 months without seeing a podiatrist.
Failure to Provide Proper Foley Catheter and Perineal Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide indwelling urinary catheter care in a manner to prevent urinary tract infection for one resident with an indwelling Foley catheter. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including sepsis, UTI, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, and obstructive uropathy. The resident’s MDS showed the resident was always incontinent of bowel and totally dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and perineal care. On observation, the resident had a bowel movement present in the perineal area while a CNA provided incontinence care, and the Foley catheter was in place at the time. During the incontinence care episode, the CNA did not cleanse the Foley catheter, catheter tubing, or catheter insertion site after removing the bowel movement. The CNA was also observed wiping the scrotal area upward toward the penile head rather than using a front-to-back cleansing technique. The resident had previously been hospitalized after being sent to the emergency room for altered mental status with an admitting diagnosis of UTI. The resident had active orders for daily and as-needed catheter care every shift, and the care plan directed staff to provide catheter care every shift and as needed. The facility’s catheter care and incontinence care policies stated that catheter care is intended to prevent urinary tract infection and that perineal cleansing should be performed from front to back.
Unsecured Medications Left in Resident Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to safely and securely store medications for one resident, R125. On 01/06/26 at 10:23 AM, surveyors observed one container of nystatin topical powder 100,000/30 grams and a two-ounce tube of Zinc Oxide Paste Maximum Strength on the dresser in R125’s room. R125 stated she applied the Zinc Oxide Paste herself but rarely used the nystatin topical powder. On 01/08/26 at 9:50 AM, both medications were still on the dresser in the resident’s room. R125 was admitted with diagnoses including acute on chronic CHF, COPD, cognitive communication deficit, dementia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. Her MDS dated 12/29/25 showed moderate cognitive impairment. At the time of the observation, the Wound Care Nurse stated R125 did not have orders for medications to be left at the bedside, and the DON stated medications should not be left unsecured in a resident’s possession because another resident could accidentally take them and they could be used incorrectly. The resident’s current order summary dated 01/08/26 showed no active orders for either nystatin powder or Zinc Oxide Paste Maximum Strength paste. The facility policy stated medications and biologicals are to be stored safely, securely, and properly, with access limited to authorized staff.
Failure to Provide Advance Directives During Resident Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide documentation of a resident's Advance Directives (AD) to the paramedics and the hospital during a transfer. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had a documented wish to remain Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), was transferred to the hospital due to shortness of breath. Despite the resident's clear wishes and the presence of a Practitioner Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form, the necessary documentation was not sent with the resident during the transfer. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) responsible for the transfer only provided the paramedics with the resident's face sheet and medication list, omitting the POLST form. The LPN was unaware that the POLST documentation should have been included, and this oversight was not addressed by the facility's policy, which only required the face sheet and medication list to be sent. The resident's daughter, who held Power of Attorney, later requested that the POLST form be sent to the hospital, highlighting the facility's failure to adhere to state law protocols requiring the provision of such documentation during transfers. The Emergency Medical Services (EMS) transport report confirmed that no Advance Directives were provided during the transfer. The facility's Social Service Director and the EMS Director both validated that the necessary documentation was not included. The resident's daughter expressed concern that the omission could have led to the resident's wishes not being honored, although the resident did not experience a code situation during the transfer or at the hospital.
Delayed Urine Specimen Collection Leads to UTI Confirmation at Urgent Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain a urine specimen in a timely manner for a resident, identified as R2, to rule out a urinary tract infection (UTI). R2 was admitted to the facility with a history of UTIs, ESBL resistance, acute kidney failure, and anemia of chronic disease. On January 21, 2025, a nursing progress note indicated that R2's daughter expressed concern about her mother's paranoia, suspecting a UTI. A lab order was placed for a urine sample to be collected the following morning. However, the order for the urinalysis and culture was not transcribed until January 25, 2025, leading to a delay in obtaining the necessary specimen. On January 25, 2025, it was noted that the initial urine collection was contaminated due to a loose lid on the specimen cup. The family opted to take R2 to urgent care, where a UTI was confirmed. The psychiatric nurse practitioner, V7, expressed that the resident should not have waited four days for the urine collection. The Director of Nursing confirmed that R2 was taken to urgent care by her family, where a urinalysis confirmed the UTI. R2 returned from the hospital with an IV line, indicating further treatment was necessary. The facility's policy requires that telephone and verbal orders be promptly recorded, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Implement Physician-Ordered Pureed Diet
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a pureed diet as ordered by a physician for a resident with a history of swallowing problems, leading to significant weight loss. The resident, who was diagnosed with conditions including dysphagia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and cerebral palsy, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living, including eating. Despite a physician's order for a pureed diet, the resident was served a mechanical soft diet, which was not suitable given their swallowing difficulties. The deficiency was identified when the resident was observed receiving a meal that did not comply with the prescribed pureed diet. The dietary manager acknowledged receiving a form to change the diet from mechanical soft to pureed only on the day of the observation, indicating a delay in implementing the diet change. The Assistant Director of Nursing had downgraded the diet to pureed earlier in the month, but the change was not communicated effectively to the dietary department, resulting in the resident continuing to receive the incorrect diet. The Speech Therapist confirmed that the resident was at risk of aspiration on a mechanical soft diet due to suboptimal positioning and recommended maintaining the pureed diet with thin liquids. The Medical Director stated that the facility should implement diet changes within 24 hours, but this did not occur. The facility lacked a policy for the process of diet order implementation, contributing to the oversight and the resident's subsequent weight loss.
Failure to Provide Adequate Personal Hygiene Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate personal hygiene care to a resident who was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). The resident, who had multiple diagnoses including osteomyelitis, stage 4 pressure ulcers, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and cerebral palsy, was observed in a state of neglect. The resident was found in bed with greasy, uncombed hair, long jagged fingernails with a blackish substance underneath, and remnants of food particles and stains on their chin and pillow. Additionally, a powdery blackish substance was noted on the resident's neck and upper chest. The resident was on contact isolation for MRSA, requiring gown and gloves for room entry. The observations were made by a registered nurse and a certified nursing assistant (CNA) who was from an agency and unfamiliar with the resident's care routine. The CNA acknowledged the resident's unkempt state and indicated that student nurses had fed the resident earlier but did not address the hygiene issues. The Director of Nursing confirmed that CNAs are responsible for providing daily personal hygiene care and acknowledged the difficulty in cutting the resident's nails due to contractures. The facility's policy on ADLs emphasized the importance of providing care in accordance with the resident's needs and preferences, yet the resident's hygiene needs were not met, leading to the deficiency.
Failure to Provide Physician-Ordered Pureed Diet
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a pureed diet as ordered by a physician for a resident with a history of swallowing problems. The resident, who was diagnosed with conditions such as dysphagia and severe protein-calorie malnutrition, was supposed to receive a pureed diet starting January 9, 2025. However, on January 16, 2025, the resident was served a mechanical soft diet instead. This discrepancy was due to a communication breakdown between the nursing staff and the dietary department. The dietary manager did not receive the diet change form until January 16, 2025, and the resident's diet card still indicated a mechanical soft diet. The resident's weight had decreased significantly, with an 8.9% loss since December 17, 2024, which was not planned or desired. The speech therapist confirmed that the resident was at risk for aspiration on a mechanical soft diet and recommended maintaining the pureed diet with thin liquids. Despite the nursing staff's attempt to downgrade the diet in the electronic medical records and notify the dietary manager, the change was not implemented in time, resulting in the resident receiving an inappropriate diet that could potentially compromise their health.
Deficiencies in Food Storage and Sanitation Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper food storage and handling practices, which could lead to foodborne illness among the 128 residents receiving dietary services. Observations revealed that the dry storage area contained opened jars of mayonnaise and barbeque sauce that were not refrigerated as required, and dented cans of peaches and sauerkraut were improperly stored without signage. Additionally, the plate warmer was found to be dirty, and the facility's policy on the storage and handling of cleaned equipment was not adhered to. In the walk-in cooler, several food items were found without proper labeling or use-by dates, including hard-boiled eggs, various juices, sliced pickles, yogurt, and meat products. These items were stored improperly, with meat placed above vegetables, risking cross-contamination. Employee food items were also stored alongside facility food, which is against policy. The facility's failure to label and date food items could result in serving expired or allergen-containing foods to residents. The facility's sanitation practices were also deficient. The sanitizer level in the three-compartment sink was found to be below the required concentration, and the logs for food temperature, freezer, walk-in cooler, and sanitizer solution concentration were incomplete. Cleaning products were improperly stored in food preparation areas, and the facility's policy on sanitation and infection control was not followed. These deficiencies in food storage, labeling, and sanitation practices could potentially compromise the safety and well-being of the residents.
Failure to Provide Adequate Grooming and Hygiene Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate grooming and hygiene care for residents who require staff assistance, as observed in five out of seven residents reviewed for activities of daily living. These residents, who have varying degrees of cognitive and physical impairments, were found with long, dirty fingernails and inadequate oral care. For instance, one resident with severe cognitive impairment was observed with contracted hands and dirty nails, expressing a desire for assistance in trimming them. Another resident with cerebral infarction and hemiplegia was found with long, dirty nails and stated that no one was helping him with nail care. The facility's Director of Nursing acknowledged that Certified Nursing Assistants are responsible for providing nail trimming and grooming at least on shower days and as needed, but this was not being done. The facility's policies on activities of daily living and nail care emphasize the importance of routine cleaning and regular trimming to prevent skin problems and ensure infection control. Despite these guidelines, multiple residents were observed with long, jagged nails and inadequate personal hygiene, indicating a failure to adhere to the facility's care standards.
Medication Storage Deficiencies in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to securely store resident medications, specifically controlled substances, as required by regulations. During an inspection, it was observed that the medication storage rooms on two units had medication refrigerators containing narcotics that were not double-locked. In one instance, the key to the refrigerator was left hanging on a hook inside the medication storage room, accessible to anyone entering the room. This oversight involved several residents' medications, including Lorazepam and Dronabinol, which were not stored according to the facility's policy and federal regulations. Additionally, the facility did not ensure that medications were stored safely at residents' bedsides. One resident was found with medications, including Glutose 15 and Fluticasone Propionate nasal spray, on their bedside table without proper orders or assessments for self-administration. Another resident had Miconazole nitrate powder and Sodium Chloride nasal spray at their bedside, also without corresponding physician orders. The Director of Nursing confirmed that residents are not permitted to store medications at their bedside without a physician's order and proper assessment. The facility's policies require that all medications, especially controlled substances, be stored securely and accessed only by authorized personnel. The failure to adhere to these policies and regulations resulted in unsecured storage of narcotics and unauthorized bedside storage of medications, posing potential risks to resident safety and medication management compliance.
Infection Control Deficiencies in PPE Use and Hand Hygiene
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices, as evidenced by multiple instances of staff not adhering to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and contact isolation protocols. For instance, a resident with wounds requiring EBP did not have Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) readily available outside their room, leading to staff providing care without wearing necessary isolation gowns. Despite signage indicating the need for PPE, staff members, including a hospice CNA and a facility CNA, did not wear gowns while providing care, citing the unavailability of gowns and lack of access to PPE stored in a locked medication room. Another resident, who required EBP due to a Gastrostomy Tube (GT) feeding, was also cared for without the appropriate use of PPE. A CNA provided incontinent care without wearing a gown, despite the presence of EBP signage. The facility's Director of Nursing and Infection Preventionist confirmed that staff should have worn gowns during high-contact care activities. Additionally, a resident on contact isolation for ESBL had visitors in the room without wearing gowns, contrary to the facility's guidelines for contact isolation. Further deficiencies were observed in the facility's infection control practices, including a CNA providing care without performing hand hygiene between glove changes and feeding two residents without cleaning hands between interactions. These actions were contrary to the facility's hand hygiene guidelines, which emphasize the importance of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of infectious agents. The report highlights a systemic issue with the availability and use of PPE, as well as adherence to infection control protocols by both staff and visitors.
Privacy and Dignity Breach for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect the privacy and dignity of two residents, R61 and R32, during care activities. R61, who is cognitively intact and has multiple diagnoses including impaired gait and requires substantial assistance with activities of daily living, was left exposed on multiple occasions. His urine collection bag was visible from the hallway, and he was left naked and exposed from the waist to the ankles when a CNA left the room to get assistance, leaving the door open. Although the CNA returned shortly to close the door, R61 remained uncovered until assistance arrived 15 minutes later. R61 expressed a preference for his urine collection bag to be concealed and for his body to be covered during care. R32, who has severe cognitive impairment and is completely dependent on staff for assistance, was also subjected to a lack of privacy. During bathing assistance provided by a hospice CNA, the room door was left open, and no curtain was drawn to shield R32 from view. Although R32 did not express concern due to her cognitive impairment, the facility's Director of Nursing acknowledged that curtains should be closed during care to protect residents' privacy. The facility's Resident Rights Guideline emphasizes the right of residents to be treated with respect and dignity, which was not upheld in these instances.
Failure to Provide Written Notification for Hospital Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely written notification to residents and their families or representatives regarding the reasons for hospital transfers, as well as failing to notify the ombudsman of these transfers. This deficiency was identified in three residents who were transferred to the hospital for various medical conditions. One resident was transferred due to altered mental status and leukocytosis, with the POA notified verbally but not in writing. Another resident was transferred for severe abdominal pain, ascites, and pneumonia, with the spouse notified verbally but lacking written documentation. The third resident was transferred following an unwitnessed fall, with no written notification provided to the resident or family. Additionally, the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged the lack of written documentation and ombudsman notification, citing unawareness of the requirement to notify the ombudsman. The facility's bed hold policy was also not properly communicated in writing to the residents or their representatives, as required. The DON admitted that the facility does not have a formal bed hold policy, instead relying on an assessment presented to residents upon leaving the facility. This lack of compliance with notification and documentation requirements constitutes a deficiency in the facility's handling of resident transfers.
Failure to Provide Bed Hold Policy Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide written documentation of the bed hold policy to residents and/or their representatives when residents were transferred to the hospital. This deficiency was identified in three cases. In the first case, a resident with altered mental status and leukocytosis was transferred to the emergency department, but the facility did not provide the bed hold policy documentation to the resident or their power of attorney (POA). In the second case, a resident experiencing severe abdominal and chest pain was sent to the hospital, and although the resident's wife was notified of the transfer, there was no documentation that the bed hold policy was provided. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that while families are notified of hospital transfers, there is no written documentation of the bed hold policy being provided. In the third case, a resident was transferred to the hospital following an unwitnessed fall, and again, the facility did not document the provision of the bed hold policy form. The facility's existing bed hold policy states that written information and notice should be given to residents or their legal representatives at the time of admission, in advance of any transfer, and at the time of transfer. However, the facility was unable to provide evidence that this policy was followed in the cases reviewed. Additionally, the facility failed to notify the ombudsman of the residents' transfers to the hospital.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments for ROM Limitations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate MDS assessments for two residents, leading to deficiencies in documenting functional limitations in range of motion (ROM). A male resident with cerebral infarction and hemiplegia affecting the right dominant side was observed with a contracted right hand, yet his MDS documented no impairment in ROM. Similarly, a female resident was observed with contracted hands, but her MDS also failed to reflect any functional limitation in ROM. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged that the hand contracture should have been coded in the functional limitation section, and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the MDS assessments did not accurately reflect the residents' statuses, which could lead to inadequate care.
Failure to Change Nephrostomy Dressing as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement a physician's order for a resident, identified as R239, who was admitted with several diagnoses including mechanical complications of a nephrostomy catheter and urinary tract infection. The deficiency was observed when the resident's daughter, V9, expressed concerns about the staff not changing the dressing on R239's nephrostomy site daily as ordered. Upon inspection, the dressing was found to be dated five days earlier, indicating it had not been changed daily. This was further confirmed when the wound nurse, V6, did not change the nephrostomy dressing even after noticing it was not fully intact. The physician's orders from November 18, 2024, specified that the nephrostomy site should be cleansed and a new dressing applied daily and as needed if the dressing was loose or soiled. The Director of Nursing, V2, confirmed that the expectation was for the dressing to be changed daily to monitor for infection and prevent complications. However, the facility staff failed to adhere to these orders, resulting in a deficiency in the quality of care provided to the resident.
Failure to Implement Fall Interventions for At-Risk Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement fall interventions for two residents at risk for falls. Resident R3 expressed concern about her bed moving when she attempted to transfer from her wheelchair, as the wheels on her bed were unlocked, causing it to move easily. Additionally, the Halo safety ring attached to her bed was not secured and spun around when touched. R3 has a history of falling and her care plan indicated the need for a safe environment, which was not provided as observed by the surveyors. Resident R94 was observed in her wheelchair without proper footwear, wearing socks that were not non-skid or non-slip. R94 reported a history of falls, including incidents where she slipped out of her wheelchair. Her care plan required her to wear appropriate footwear and follow the facility's fall protocol, which was not adhered to. The facility's Falls Guidelines emphasized the need to identify and evaluate residents at risk for falls and to provide an environment free from hazards, which was not achieved in these cases.
Failure to Conduct Gradual Dose Reductions for Psychotropic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct gradual dose reductions (GDR) for residents taking psychotropic medications, as required by regulatory guidelines. For one resident, identified as R109, the facility's records showed a history of traumatic brain injury, dementia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. The resident was prescribed Citalopram, Quetiapine, and Trazadone. Although a GDR was performed in April 2024, there was no documentation of a subsequent GDR in October 2024, as required. Additionally, there was no behavior monitoring documentation for this resident, which the Director of Nursing attributed to a change in the electronic medical record (EMR) system. Another resident, identified as R82, was admitted with diagnoses of psychosis, major depression, and anxiety disorder. This resident was receiving Lorazepam, Olanzapine, Trazadone, and Clonazepam. The facility did not attempt any GDR for this resident, and there was no signed psychotropic medication consent on file. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that no GDR had been attempted since the facility's psychiatrist retired in March. The facility's guidelines require GDR to be attempted quarterly, but this was not adhered to for R82.
Medication Administration Errors Exceed Acceptable Rate
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer medications as ordered, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.14%, which exceeds the acceptable threshold of 5%. This deficiency was observed in two residents during a medication pass. The first resident, with diagnoses including dementia, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure, was administered two Potassium Chloride ER 10 meQs tablets instead of the prescribed one tablet twice a day. The LPN responsible for administering the medication noted a discrepancy between the physician's order and her own note, which led to the incorrect dosage being given. The Director of Nursing confirmed that such discrepancies should be clarified with the physician before medication administration, as excessive potassium can be harmful to the heart. The second resident, diagnosed with chronic kidney disease and dementia, received a Vitamin D3 dosage of 125 mcg instead of the prescribed 50 mcg. The LPN administered the incorrect dosage and later confirmed the error upon reviewing the resident's chart. The Director of Nursing was uncertain about the potential harm of the increased Vitamin D3 dosage, although the Springhouse Nurse's Drug Guide indicates possible adverse reactions. The resident's care plan highlighted renal insufficiency related to stage 3 kidney failure, which could be exacerbated by incorrect medication dosages. The facility's policy on medication administration emphasizes the importance of reviewing the '5 Rights' to ensure safe and effective medication administration, which was not adhered to in these instances.
Unsafe Bed Control Poses Risk to Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe and homelike environment for a resident, identified as R114, due to a malfunctioning bed control. During an observation, the bed control was found wrapped around a safety ring on the resident's bed, with exposed wires and a broken white wire. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the safety issue, noting that the exposed and broken wires could lead to the resident being shocked or the bed control malfunctioning. The facility's policy mandates that unsafe equipment should not be used and must be reported to a supervisor promptly.
Failure to Serve Meals at Scheduled Times
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to serve meals at the scheduled times, affecting all 129 residents who receive food prepared in the facility kitchen. During an entrance conference, it was noted that lunch service began after 1:45 PM on April 1, 2024. Residents active in the Resident Council confirmed that meals have been served as late as two hours after the scheduled time, with dinner sometimes being served as late as 8:00 PM. The facility's mealtime schedule indicated that breakfast and lunch should be served between 8:00-8:30 AM and 12:00-12:30 PM, respectively. However, observations showed that meal services were consistently delayed, with lunch service starting at 12:55 PM and the last cart being taken to the floor at 2:15 PM on April 1, 2024. Similar delays were observed on April 2, 2024, with residents expressing dissatisfaction and concern over the late meal times, especially those with specific dietary needs like diabetes who require timely meals for health reasons. Staff interviews revealed that the delays were due to staffing issues, including a cook and a dietary aide calling off, which left the kitchen understaffed. The cook on duty mentioned that he was not used to being the lead cook, which contributed to the delays. The facility administrator acknowledged being aware of the late meal times due to complaints from staff. The facility's policy on mealtimes and frequency states that meals should be served at regular times comparable to standard mealtimes in the community or according to the residents' needs, preferences, and plan of care. However, the facility failed to adhere to this policy, resulting in late meal services and dissatisfaction among residents.
Failure to Maintain Sanitary Conditions in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to serve foods in a sanitary manner, affecting all 129 residents who receive food prepared in the facility kitchen. During an initial tour of the kitchen, multiple sanitation issues were observed, including a dirty rag in the hand washing sink, extensive grime and unknown debris in the dish machine area, and improperly stored clean dishes. Additionally, the walk-in cooler had extensive debris on the floor, and the food prep area had multiple dirty rags and soiled sanitizer buckets. The milk refrigerator had congealed spills and a putrid smell, and the dry storage area was disorganized with no first-in, first-out system in place. The spoodle and scoop storage units contained blackish grime and other dirt-like particles, which were not cleaned before use during tray line service. On a subsequent day, a dietary aide was observed improperly washing dishes in the 3-compartment sink, using the second sink for both rinsing and sanitizing due to the third sink being non-functional. This practice did not adhere to the facility's policy for proper dishwashing and sanitation. Additionally, during the preparation of a pureed meal, a cook was observed not following the recipe, touching multiple surfaces with gloved hands, and contaminating the pureed mixture by dipping her gloved fingers into it. The cook also failed to reheat the pureed food to the required temperature of 165 degrees Fahrenheit before service. The facility's policies on sanitation and infection control, as well as dishwashing and sanitation, were not followed. These policies are designed to ensure that food is prepared, handled, and stored in a sanitary manner to prevent contamination and food-borne diseases. The observed deficiencies indicate a failure to adhere to these policies, resulting in unsanitary conditions in the kitchen and improper food handling practices that could potentially affect the health and safety of the residents.
Failure to Provide Adequate Grooming and Hygiene Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate grooming and hygiene care for residents who require assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL). This deficiency was observed in four residents. One resident, who is dependent on staff for ADL care, was found with long dirty fingernails, overgrown facial hair, uncombed greasy hair, and a foul-smelling odor on two separate occasions. Another resident, who requires substantial assistance for grooming and hygiene, reported not receiving a bed bath for two consecutive weeks and was observed with long dirty fingernails. A third resident, who needs supervision or touching assistance for grooming, stated that he had not received a shower for two weeks due to staff shortages. The fourth resident, who requires substantial assistance, was observed with long dirty fingernails and overgrown nasal hair on multiple occasions. Staff interviews revealed that residents are scheduled to receive bed baths or showers twice a week, but documentation for the month of April was missing. The most recent Bath and Skin Report Sheet for March showed that the last time the residents were showered or received a bed bath was mid-March. The Director of Nursing confirmed that showers are scheduled twice a week and that nail care should be provided immediately when needed. However, the facility failed to adhere to these schedules, resulting in the observed deficiencies.
Incorrect Portion Sizes Served for Mechanical Soft Diet
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to serve the correct portions of mechanical soft fish as specified in the menu spreadsheet. During tray line service, residents on mechanical soft diets received two scoops of ground fish served with a red-handled spoodle, which amounted to 2 + 2/3 oz per serving instead of the required 5 + 1/3 oz. Additionally, the residents did not receive gravy with their fish as indicated in the menu. The cook on duty, who was not the main cook, was unaware of the menu spreadsheet and used the incorrect scoop size due to the unavailability of the correct #6 scoop. The Vice President of Culinary confirmed that the facility should follow the menu spreadsheet to ensure residents receive the required amount of protein.
Failure to Follow Infection Control Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow standard infection control practices during the provision of incontinence care and when entering isolation rooms. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were observed not performing proper hand hygiene and not changing gloves between dirty and clean tasks. For instance, one CNA washed her soiled gloves instead of changing them, and another CNA did not perform hand hygiene after changing soiled gloves. Additionally, staff did not don full Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when entering isolation rooms, despite clear signage indicating the need for gowns and gloves. This was observed with multiple residents who were on contact isolation for infections such as MRSA and VRE. Housekeeping staff also failed to adhere to infection control protocols. A housekeeper was seen entering and cleaning isolation rooms wearing only gloves and not the required disposable gown. This occurred despite the presence of signage indicating the need for full PPE. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the housekeeper should have worn a gown and gloves when cleaning these rooms, as organisms could be present anywhere in the room. The housekeeper admitted to not being informed about the need for additional PPE.
Failure to Document Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccine Offers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide documentation that influenza and pneumococcal vaccines had been offered to five residents. For instance, an 83-year-old resident with multiple diagnoses, including cerebral infarction and atrial fibrillation, had no documentation of being offered or receiving the vaccines since admission. Similarly, a 95-year-old resident with pneumonia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease had no record of being offered the pneumococcal vaccine despite CDC recommendations. Another resident, aged 91, with conditions such as metabolic encephalopathy and heart failure, also lacked documentation of being offered or receiving the vaccines since admission. Additionally, an 85-year-old resident with Parkinson's disease and heart failure had no documentation of being offered the PCV20 vaccine, despite having received the PPSV23 vaccine previously. An 89-year-old resident with acute diastolic congestive heart failure and epilepsy had no record of receiving the influenza vaccine for the 2023-2024 flu season or being offered the pneumococcal vaccine. The facility's policies on influenza and pneumococcal vaccines, dated December 2006, were not followed, as there was no documentation of vaccine offers or refusals in the residents' medical records.
Failure to Provide Timely Pain Management and Notify Physician
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the physician of a resident's pain and provide medication as ordered by the physician. Resident R65, who was readmitted from the hospital with multiple diagnoses including orthopedic aftercare and chronic ulcer, was cognitively intact and had a physician's order for hydrocodone-acetaminophen (Norco) to be administered every 4 hours as needed. Despite this, R65 reported severe pain and requested pain medication multiple times without receiving it. The resident's pain score was consistently high, reaching 9.5 on a scale of 1-10, and the resident was unable to eat due to the pain. The medication administration record showed that Norco was not administered from March 26, 2024, to April 2, 2024, due to the medication being unavailable in the cart and a lack of a refill order from the practitioner. The staff, including the Registered Nurse and Licensed Practical Nurse, were aware of the resident's pain but did not take timely action to obtain the necessary medication or notify the physician promptly. The Director of Nursing only became aware of the resident's severe pain on April 2, 2024, and subsequently obtained a new prescription from the Nurse Practitioner. The facility's policy on pain management, which includes regular reassessment of pain and notifying the physician of significant changes, was not followed. The failure to provide timely pain management and notify the physician resulted in the resident experiencing prolonged and severe pain, impacting their ability to perform daily activities and eat. The Nurse Practitioner confirmed that they were not informed of the resident's high pain levels and would have prescribed additional medication if they had been aware.
Failure to Monitor and Document Dialysis Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to monitor the clinical condition of a resident upon returning from dialysis and did not provide clinical documentation of the resident's condition during dialysis treatment. The resident, a male with acute and chronic congestive heart failure, end-stage renal disease, morbid obesity, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, had no physician orders for dialysis or for monitoring the dialysis access shunt site upon return from dialysis. The Director of Nurses (DON) admitted that the dialysis orders were not reactivated and that the facility did not receive any reports, weights, labs, or communication from the dialysis company post-dialysis sessions. Additionally, the DON did not follow up with the dialysis company when the dialysis log profile forms were not returned after dialysis sessions. The Dialysis RN confirmed that the dialysis company did not receive any forms from the facility to document pre/post dialysis conditions and only received the resident's face sheet and medication list. There was no documentation in the resident's medical record of any assessment after dialysis from March 12, 2024, until April 3, 2024. The facility's dialysis care plan indicated the need to monitor and report signs of localized infection, monitor circulation, motion, and sensation of the extremity with the access device every shift, and palpate the shunt for thrill every shift. However, the facility did not provide a policy for dialysis care and treatment when requested, and the Administrator confirmed that no such policy existed.
Failure to Identify Diagnosis and Specific Behavior for Antipsychotic Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to identify the diagnosis and specific behavior for residents who are prescribed antipsychotic medication. This deficiency was observed in three residents. One resident, who has multiple medical diagnoses including Parkinson's disease and unspecified dementia, was prescribed Quetiapine but displayed no behaviors warranting its use. Staff and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the resident had no psychiatric evaluation and no documented targeted behavior for the antipsychotic medication. The resident's care plan included monitoring behavior and response to medication, but no specific behaviors were documented to justify the use of Quetiapine. Another resident, diagnosed with unspecified dementia and other conditions, was also prescribed Quetiapine. Observations showed the resident sleeping most of the time, and staff confirmed that the resident currently had no behaviors justifying the medication. The psychiatric evaluation did not document any behavior related to the use of Quetiapine. The resident's care plan mentioned the risk of adverse side effects from psychotropic medications but did not document any targeted behavior for the antipsychotic medication. A third resident, admitted with unspecified dementia and other diagnoses, was prescribed Quetiapine despite having no psychiatric diagnosis or behaviors documented in the facility's records. The Medical Director was unaware of the reason for the prescription. The resident's care plan did not target any behavior or diagnosis for the antipsychotic medication. The facility's policy on psychotropic medications requires documentation of specific conditions or behaviors to justify the use of antipsychotic drugs, which was not followed in these cases.
Medication Administration Error
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was not given insulin belonging to another resident and did not follow the facility's policy regarding medication administration. On April 2, 2024, an agency nurse (V7) was observed preparing to administer insulin to a resident (R115) whose blood sugar was high. V7 could not find the insulin in her cart and retrieved a vial from another cart that had a different resident's (R380) name on it. Despite the surveyor's intervention, V7 initially intended to administer the insulin drawn from the vial labeled for R380, who had been discharged. The insulin was also past its expiration date as per the facility's policy, which states that insulins expire 28 days after being opened. The Director of Nurses (V2) and the facility's pharmacist (V37) confirmed that insulins should not be shared between residents due to safety and infection control concerns. The facility's Medication Administration policy mandates a triple check of the five rights (right resident, right drug, right dose, right route, and right time) during medication preparation and administration. V7 failed to adhere to these protocols, leading to the potential administration of expired and incorrectly labeled insulin to R115.
Failure to Provide Nutrient-Equivalent Meal Substitutes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide substitute meals with the same nutrient content for three residents. The facility's Fall/Winter menu for Monday listed Lemon Baked Fish as the main entree, which provided a minimum of 2 ounces of protein per serving. During lunch meal preparation, a cook was observed making grilled cheese sandwiches with only 2 slices of cheese, which did not meet the required protein content. The residents had ordered grilled cheese as a substitute for the lemon baked fish. The facility's production recipe for grilled cheese sandwiches specified that 3 slices of cheese were needed to meet the 2-ounce protein requirement. The Vice President of Culinary confirmed that the meal replacement should have the same equivalent of protein servings.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,514 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 24 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Lemont
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Franciscan Village | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 14 | 0 |
| Aliya Of Palos Park | 3 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Victorian Village Hlth & Well | 3.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Meadowbrook Manor | 5.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 0 |
| Warren Barr Orland Park | 6.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Lemont Nursing & Rehab Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.