Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Accolade Healthcare Of Peoria during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with confusion and some dementia was moved to different rooms multiple times, but the resident’s POA/family member was not notified in writing before the moves and was not given the reason for the change. The family member reported finding the resident’s belongings already moved after returning from lunch, and the record lacked documentation of advance notice for at least one room change. Staff and leadership confirmed that written notice should be provided before a room transfer.
Failure to document, assess, and care-plan resident falls: The facility did not complete required post-fall documentation, notifications, or assessments for one resident who later was found to have a hip fracture after an unwitnessed fall, and did not adequately position a paraplegic resident during wound care, resulting in a fall from bed. A third resident’s fall risk was not updated in the care plan after an unwitnessed fall, despite being identified as high risk. The facility’s policies required incident reporting, physician and responsible party notification, fall assessments, neuro checks when indicated, and care plan updates after significant changes.
The facility failed to maintain safe and well-maintained resident rooms and hallways, including damaged and stained ceiling tiles, ripped wallpaper, exposed insulation and studs, and loose or detached baseboard trim in resident areas and corridors. One resident’s room had sagging, stained ceiling tiles and a damaged wall with exposed insulation, while another room shared by two residents had baseboard trim pulled away and lying in the main walking path between beds. Several hallway ceiling tiles were stained and cracked. A cognitively intact resident reported that wall damage in their room had not been repaired, and staff acknowledged prior roof leaks causing damage and the need for additional repairs, while also stating they were unaware of some of the existing hazards.
A wound nurse did not wear a protective gown while providing wound care to a resident with an unstageable pressure ulcer, despite clear signage and facility policy requiring Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) including gown and glove use for such high-contact care activities.
The facility failed to comply with its policies on facial hair restraints and food labeling. A dietary aide was observed without a beard cover, and several food items in the walk-in freezer were not labeled or dated. The dietary manager was unsure of the beard coverage policy, and acknowledged that staff are responsible for labeling and dating food items.
The facility failed to revise care plans for several residents, resulting in deficiencies in addressing their specific medical and care needs. Care plans lacked nonpharmacological interventions for managing conditions such as depression, anxiety, and schizophrenia. Additionally, critical aspects of care, such as dialysis management and decision-making abilities, were not adequately documented, as verified by the Care Plan Coordinator.
The facility failed to provide appropriate indications for antipsychotic medications in several residents with dementia, lacking documentation of target behaviors and non-pharmacological interventions. Additionally, there were instances of duplicate drug therapy and inappropriate medication orders, highlighting a lack of proper assessment and documentation.
A facility failed to notify the State Agency of a new bipolar disorder diagnosis for a resident, which required a new PASRR. The resident was initially admitted with dementia and later diagnosed with bipolar disorder, but no new PASRR was completed. The administrator confirmed the oversight.
A facility failed to observe, assess, and document the care of a resident with a colostomy. The resident had a physician's order to monitor the colostomy, empty the pouch when one-third full, and change the appliance every three to five days. However, there was no documentation in the medical record regarding these actions. The administrator and care plan coordinator confirmed the absence of documentation for the colostomy's monitoring, assessment, or changes.
A facility failed to provide specific dialysis orders and care for a resident with End Stage Renal Disease. The resident's medical record lacked dialysis orders, a nephrologist, post-dialysis target weight, and care instructions for the dialysis port. Staff interviews revealed uncertainty about the resident's nephrologist and the absence of necessary documentation in the resident's chart.
A resident was found with a tipped-over medicine cup containing 11 pills on their bedside table, without any documented approval for self-administration. An LPN admitted to not staying with the resident to ensure medication consumption, contrary to facility policy. The DON confirmed the medications were the resident's morning doses, which included several prescribed drugs.
The facility failed to respond to call lights in a timely manner for two residents with mobility restrictions, leading to prolonged periods of discomfort and distress. One resident was left in a wheelchair with a back brace for an extended period, while another was left on the commode for two hours without assistance.
A resident with mobility restrictions following lumbar fusion surgery was repeatedly observed without access to a call light, leading to distress and prolonged periods without assistance. The facility's staff failed to adhere to the policy of placing call lights within reach, compromising the resident's ability to request help.
A resident who required rehabilitation services post-lumbar spine fusion surgery did not receive proper care due to the lack of physician orders for spinal precautions, improper use of a spine brace, and inadequate pain and indigestion management. The resident experienced significant discomfort and pain, and staff were not adequately trained on the use of the spine brace and spinal precautions.
A facility failed to implement necessary interventions to prevent pressure ulcers for a high-risk resident who had undergone lumbar fusion surgery. The resident was observed without heel protectors, left in a wheelchair without a pressure-relieving pad, and experienced significant pain due to improper care. Facility policies on repositioning and skin care were not followed, leading to inadequate prevention of skin breakdown.
The facility failed to ensure staff were competent in handling a resident's specialized equipment and spinal precautions following lumbar fusion surgery. The resident was repeatedly left in a wheelchair with a spine brace on, causing significant pain. Staff improperly used a mechanical lift without removing the brace and failed to follow prescribed spinal precautions, leading to severe discomfort and improper care.
The facility failed to ensure the right resident received IV hydration and micronutrient therapy, and did not obtain a physician's order. A trainee nurse administered an IV to the wrong resident, resulting in a bruise. The incident was due to improper verification of the resident's identity.
Failure to Provide Written Notice Before Room Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident and the resident’s family were notified in writing before the resident was moved to a different room, and the notice did not include the reason for the move. The deficiency involved one of three residents reviewed for resident rights. The resident had been admitted for rehabilitation and had confusion with some dementia at times. The resident’s family member, who was the first contact and power of attorney, stated that on one occasion the resident returned from lunch to find the room already changed and belongings moved, and that she was not notified beforehand. She also stated the resident had several room moves during the stay and she was not informed in advance. The resident’s electronic census report showed room moves on 1/1/26, 2/27/26, and 3/11/26. The medical record did not contain documentation that the resident or family member were notified of the room move on or before 1/1/26. A Room Transfer/New Roommate form dated 2/27/26 documented a move from one room to 402 due to a new admission, but the form listed the date of notice as 2/27/26 and left the date of room change blank. Staff stated that when residents are transferred rooms, they tell the resident and call families with the reason and document it in nursing notes, while the Social Service Director and Administrator confirmed that residents should receive written notice before a room move and that family should be notified if the resident is not alert and oriented.
Failure to document, assess, and care-plan resident falls
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents were safely positioned and appropriately monitored after falls, and failed to complete required post-fall documentation and care plan updates for three residents reviewed. The facility’s policy required accident and incident reporting on the shift the event occurred, nurse examination of the resident, notification of the physician and responsible parties, completion of fall-related assessments, and documentation in progress notes. The care planning policy required care plans to be updated for significant changes and to reflect identified problems and safety needs. One resident with diagnoses including heart failure, dementia, and Parkinson’s disease was documented as high risk for falls. Nursing documentation later noted that a CNA reported the resident was on the dining room floor and that the resident was assessed and assisted back to a chair, but the record did not show nursing notes for the fall on the day it occurred, a post-fall assessment, neurological checks, 72-hour vital signs, or notifications to the physician, family, or DON until two days later, when the resident had already been transferred to the hospital and found to have a left hip fracture. The Administrator confirmed the fall was not documented or reported to nursing management until after the fracture was discovered. A second resident with muscle wasting, neuromuscular dysfunction, paraplegia, multiple sclerosis, and a stage III pressure ulcer experienced a witnessed fall during wound care when staff were assisting the resident in bed and the resident slid from the surface. The resident later stated that during care, while being rolled to the side on an air mattress, momentum sent the resident over the other side of the bed and that the resident felt scared during treatment unless someone stood in front. A third resident with muscle wasting, unsteadiness on feet, and lack of coordination had an unwitnessed fall in the room, and the fall assessment identified the resident as high risk for falls; however, the care plan remained documented as moderate risk and was not updated to reflect the increased fall risk after the fall.
Failure to Maintain Safe and Well-Maintained Resident Rooms and Hallways
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and comfortable environment in multiple resident rooms and hallways. One resident’s bathroom contained two ceiling tiles with a brown substance covering about one-quarter of each tile and one tile sagging from the ceiling. In the same room, the wall across from the bed had blue construction tape over ripped wallpaper extending from the floor to about four feet up, and a three-foot by six-inch section of wall had loose floor trim pulled away, with crushed or missing drywall exposing insulation and wood studs. Ceiling tiles in two separate hallways were also observed with brown substances and damage: one hallway tile was more than half covered in a brown substance and cracked down the center, and two tiles on another hallway were more than half covered in a brown substance down the center. In another room shared by two residents, one wall’s baseboard trim was partially detached, with approximately two feet of trim pulled away and lying on the floor in the center aisle between the foot of both beds and the wall, in the path used by staff and residents to access beds and supplies. The affected residents included individuals with severe cognitive impairment and high fall risk. One resident’s MDS documented Alzheimer’s dementia, severe cognitive impairment, use of a manual wheelchair, and dependence for care, with a care plan identifying high fall risk. Another resident’s MDS documented non-Alzheimer’s dementia, severe cognitive impairment, wheelchair use, and dependence for care, also with a care plan identifying high fall risk. A cognitively intact resident in a room with damaged wall and prior leak-related work reported that the wall on their side had not been fixed and expressed a desire for repair so they would not get sick. Facility staff interviews revealed that a project manager acknowledged a prior roof leak requiring drywall and baseboard replacement in one room due to mold and stated another resident room needed similar work. The maintenance assistant described a roof line leak from an air/heat unit above two rooms that caused damage to walls, trim, and ceiling tiles, confirmed that one resident’s room still needed wall/trim/ceiling tile repairs, and admitted unawareness of the detached trim in the shared room and the damaged ceiling tiles in the hallways, despite the job description for the Maintenance Director requiring ensuring all aspects of the facility are in a good state of repair.
Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a wound nurse failed to follow the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy during wound care for a resident with an unstageable pressure ulcer on the left buttock. The resident was under daily wound care orders, and a sign on the resident's door indicated that EBP, including the use of gown and gloves for close contact care, was required. Despite this, the wound nurse performed the wound care without donning a protective gown, as observed by surveyors. The facility's policy, dated 10/21/22, specifies that gown and glove use is mandatory during high-contact activities such as wound care for residents requiring EBP.
Failure to Follow Food Safety and Hair Restraint Policies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its policy regarding the use of facial hair restraints in the kitchen and the proper labeling and dating of food items. During an observation, a dietary aide was seen washing dishes without a beard cover, contrary to the facility's Hair Restraints Policy, which mandates that all dining services staff wear hair restraints, including beard guards, in food production and dishwashing areas. The dietary aide was unaware of the requirement to cover his beard, and the dietary manager was also uncertain about the policy regarding beard coverage. Additionally, during an inspection of the facility's walk-in freezer, several food items, including a bag of frozen mixed vegetables and multiple bags of hot dog buns and sliced loaf bread, were found without labels or dates. The facility's Food Storage Policy requires all food items to be labeled with the name of the food and the date by which it should be sold, consumed, or discarded. The dietary manager acknowledged that the responsibility for labeling and dating food items lies with the staff who open the boxes or containers, and confirmed that the items should have been labeled and dated.
Deficiencies in Care Plan Revisions for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise care plans for six residents, leading to deficiencies in addressing their specific medical and care needs. For Resident 9, the care plan lacked documentation of nonpharmacological interventions for managing depression and paranoid schizophrenia, despite being on multiple medications for these conditions. Similarly, Resident 110's care plan did not include nonpharmacological interventions for anxiety and depression, even though the resident was prescribed medications for these diagnoses. Resident 265, who has end-stage renal disease and a dialysis catheter, had a care plan that did not address critical aspects such as emergency contacts, target weight, or specific dialysis orders. The care plan also failed to include an assessment of the dialysis port, which is essential for managing the resident's condition. Resident 94, with an ileostomy, had a care plan that inaccurately included interventions for constipation and did not reflect the resident's current needs or goals, such as the potential reversal of the colostomy. Resident 415's care plan was incomplete, lacking nonpharmacological interventions for anxiety and depression, and did not specify the resident's decision-making abilities. Similarly, Resident 22's care plan did not include nonpharmacological interventions for managing behaviors associated with dementia, bipolar disorder, and other psychiatric conditions, despite being on antipsychotic medication. These omissions indicate a failure to provide comprehensive and individualized care plans for the residents, as verified by the Care Plan Coordinator.
Inadequate Justification and Documentation for Psychotropic Medication Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate indications for the use of antipsychotic medications in several residents diagnosed with dementia. Specifically, seven residents were identified as receiving antipsychotic medications without proper justification or documentation of target behaviors. For instance, one resident was prescribed Risperdal for dementia with behaviors, yet their care plan did not reflect any behavioral disturbances. Another resident was given Olanzapine for dementia with mood disorder, but the consent form lacked details on the indication for use or target behaviors. Additionally, the facility did not identify or implement non-pharmacological interventions for two residents receiving antidepressant medications. These residents' medical records lacked documentation of alternative methods attempted before resorting to pharmacological treatments. The Director of Nursing confirmed the absence of non-pharmacological interventions and acknowledged that such documentation should have been present. The report also highlights instances of duplicate drug therapy and inappropriate medication orders. For example, one resident was started on Quetiapine, an antipsychotic, for depression, which the Director of Nursing admitted was inappropriate. Another resident's care plan did not align with their behavior tracking report, which showed no recent behaviors warranting the prescribed antipsychotic medication. These deficiencies indicate a lack of proper assessment and documentation in the administration of psychotropic medications.
Failure to Notify State Agency of New Bipolar Diagnosis
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the appropriate State Agency of a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder for a resident, identified as R81, which was necessary for a new Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). R81 was admitted with a primary diagnosis of dementia with other behavioral disturbances, and the initial PASRR indicated no need for a Level II determination. However, the resident's medical records later showed a diagnosis of bipolar disorder added on two separate occasions, first on December 12, 2022, and then as bipolar/hypomanic on May 12, 2023. Despite these updates, there was no documentation or evidence that a new PASRR was completed following the addition of the bipolar diagnosis. The facility administrator confirmed that the State Agency should have been notified to conduct a new screening based on the updated diagnosis.
Failure to Document Colostomy Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to observe, assess, and document the care of a resident with a colostomy. The resident, identified as R94, has a diagnosis of ileostomy status and a physician's order to monitor the colostomy, empty the pouch when it is one-third full, and change the appliance every three to five days. However, there was no documentation in the resident's medical record, including the treatment administration record (TAR), medication administration record (MAR), or nurses' notes, regarding the monitoring, assessment, or changing of the colostomy. On September 4, 2024, the resident expressed a desire to have the colostomy reversed and showed the surveyor the colostomy. On September 6, 2024, the facility's administrator confirmed the absence of documentation for the resident's colostomy outputs. Additionally, the care plan coordinator verified that there was no routine documentation of the colostomy's monitoring, assessment, or changes in the resident's medical record.
Deficiency in Dialysis Care and Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide specific dialysis orders and care for a resident requiring dialysis services. The facility's dialysis protocol, revised in September 2023, mandates that nursing staff are responsible for monitoring the dialysis access site for signs of infection or bleeding and ensuring the resident's care plan reflects their dialysis needs. However, the medical record for a resident with End Stage Renal Disease and an acquired absence of a kidney lacked dialysis orders, a listed nephrologist, post-dialysis target weight, and instructions for caring for the dialysis port. Observations and interviews revealed further deficiencies. The resident had a right chest dialysis catheter port and confirmed being on dialysis. A Licensed Practical Nurse admitted to being unsure of the resident's nephrologist and acknowledged that all residents on dialysis should have specific orders and a target weight documented in their charts. Additionally, a Registered Nurse in Dialysis, contracted by the facility, stated that the facility does not have access to specific resident orders for dialysis and emphasized the importance of staff being aware of any concerns with dialysis access sites and knowing the nephrologist to contact in emergencies.
Medication Storage and Administration Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper medication storage and administration for a resident, leading to a deficiency. During an observation, a resident was found lying in bed with a medicine cup containing 11 pills on the bedside table. The cup had been tipped over, spilling approximately half of the pills onto the table. The resident was unable to identify the medications or state which pill was which. This incident occurred without any assessments or physician orders for self-administration of medications documented in the resident's medical record. A Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed that they had given the resident their morning medications but did not stay to ensure all medications were consumed, which was against the facility's policy. The Director of Nursing verified that the medications in front of the resident were indeed their morning medications. The resident's Medication Administration Record listed several medications that were supposed to be administered that morning, including Escitalopram, Omeprazole, and Carbidopa-Levodopa, among others.
Failure to Respond to Call Lights in a Timely Manner
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner and responded to accommodate the residents' needs for two residents with mobility restrictions. Resident R3, admitted for rehabilitation services post-lumbar fusion surgery, was observed on multiple occasions in pain and discomfort, waiting for assistance after activating the call light. On one occasion, R3 was left in a wheelchair with a back brace for an extended period, causing significant distress. Despite repeated attempts to get help, including contacting their healthcare power of attorney, R3's needs were not promptly addressed by the staff. Similarly, Resident R4, admitted for rehabilitation services related to a right lower leg fracture, reported being left on the commode for two hours without assistance. R4, who requires substantial help with toileting hygiene due to mobility issues, expressed frustration and distress over the lack of timely response from the staff. These incidents highlight the facility's failure to provide timely and adequate care to residents with significant mobility restrictions, leading to prolonged periods of discomfort and distress. The observations and interviews with the residents and their representatives indicate a pattern of neglect in responding to call lights, which is critical for residents who depend on staff assistance for their daily needs and pain management.
Failure to Ensure Call Lights Were Accessible for Resident with Mobility Restrictions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure call lights were available for resident use, specifically for a resident with mobility restrictions following lumbar fusion surgery. The resident, who required substantial assistance with mobility and was at high risk for falls, was observed multiple times without access to a call light. On one occasion, the resident's call light was draped over the bed and unreachable while the resident was in a wheelchair. The resident's roommate had to activate the call light on their behalf. Despite the roommate's efforts, the resident remained unattended for an extended period, leading to distress and discomfort. The resident's healthcare power of attorney confirmed that the resident had called them in distress due to being left in a wheelchair with a brace on for an extended period. The power of attorney had to contact the front desk to ensure the resident was attended to. The facility's administrator acknowledged that staff should ensure call lights are within reach of residents before exiting the room. This deficiency highlights a failure to adhere to the facility's policy of placing call lights within reach, compromising the resident's ability to request assistance when needed.
Failure to Provide Resident-Centered Care and Proper Use of Spine Brace
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide resident-centered care for a resident who required rehabilitation services following a lumbar spine fusion surgery. The resident's hospital transfer papers and therapy evaluations specified the need for a spine brace during ambulation and transfers, as well as spinal precautions to avoid bending, lifting, or twisting. However, the facility did not have physician orders for spinal precautions, and the care plan lacked interventions related to the spine brace and spinal precautions. The resident was observed multiple times wearing the spine brace while seated in a wheelchair, contrary to the specified instructions, causing discomfort and pain. Additionally, the resident's pain and indigestion were not adequately assessed or managed, and the medication administration record lacked documentation of treatment for indigestion. The resident experienced significant pain and discomfort due to improper use of the spine brace and inadequate pain management. The resident was observed grimacing and expressing that the brace was causing pain and nausea. Despite the resident's complaints and visible discomfort, staff did not promptly address the issues. The resident's healthcare power of attorney also reported concerns about the resident being left in the wheelchair with the brace on for extended periods and staff performing actions that were not appropriate for the resident's condition. Further observations revealed that staff were not properly trained on the use of the spine brace and spinal precautions. A physical therapist noted that staff should have been using the log roll technique and removing the brace while the resident was in the wheelchair and during mechanical lift transfers. The facility's policies on transfers and pain management were not followed, leading to inadequate care and increased pain for the resident. The lack of staff education and proper documentation contributed to the deficiencies in the resident's care.
Failure to Implement Pressure Ulcer Prevention Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to prevent the development of pressure ulcers or worsening of wounds for a resident (R3) who was at high risk for pressure ulcers. R3 had a lumbar fusion surgery and required a spine brace while up and ambulating, but not while in bed or a chair. Despite being identified as high risk with a Braden Scale score of 12 and having a care plan that included frequent repositioning, the facility did not consistently implement these interventions. On multiple occasions, R3 was observed without heel protectors and without a pressure-relieving pad in the wheelchair. Additionally, R3 was left in a wheelchair with the brace on for extended periods, causing significant pain and discomfort. The resident's dressing was also found improperly positioned, failing to cover the surgical incision adequately. The facility's policies, including the Formulized Turning and Positioning Program and the Preventative Skin Care policy, were not followed. These policies required residents at moderate to high risk for pressure ulcers to be turned, toileted, and repositioned every two hours or as needed. Despite these guidelines, R3 was left in the same position for extended periods and did not receive the necessary interventions to prevent skin breakdown. The resident's healthcare power of attorney also reported that R3 was left in pain and without proper care, further highlighting the facility's failure to adhere to its own policies and care plans.
Failure to Ensure Staff Competency in Handling Specialized Equipment and Spinal Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure staff were competent to care for a resident (R3) who required specialized equipment and spinal precautions following a lumbar fusion surgery and spinal stenosis. R3's hospital transfer papers and subsequent evaluations documented the need for a spine brace to be worn during transfers and ambulation, but not while in bed or a chair. Despite these instructions, R3 was observed multiple times in a wheelchair with the spine brace on, causing significant discomfort and pain. R3's care plan and physician's orders lacked documentation of spinal precautions and proper application of the spine brace, leading to improper handling and increased pain for R3. On one occasion, R3 was left in a wheelchair with the spine brace on, causing pain and discomfort. The call light was unreachable, and R3's roommate had to assist in calling for help. When staff finally arrived, they improperly used a mechanical lift without removing the spine brace, further exacerbating R3's pain. Additionally, a Certified Nurse Aide admitted to putting the brace on incorrectly. R3 was left in bed with the call light out of reach and reported severe pain and indigestion. The dressing covering R3's back incision was found to be improperly applied, and staff used incorrect techniques that involved twisting motions, contrary to the prescribed spinal precautions. Interviews with staff and R3's healthcare power of attorney revealed that staff were not adequately educated on the use of the spine brace and spinal precautions. The physical therapist confirmed that staff should have been using the log roll technique and removing the spine brace during transfers. The facility's policy on transfers required proper training for staff on the use of mechanical lifts, which was not adhered to in R3's case. The lack of staff education and adherence to prescribed precautions led to significant pain and improper care for R3.
Failure to Ensure Proper IV Therapy Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the right resident received IV access hydration and micronutrient therapy, and did not obtain a physician's order for the administration of IV hydration and micronutrient therapy for one resident. An incident occurred where an IV therapy company inserted an IV into the wrong resident's wrist, resulting in the resident receiving approximately 300 ml of a nutrition solution. The resident, who was not supposed to receive the IV, pulled it out, causing a bruise on the right wrist. The incident was due to a mix-up by a trainee nurse who did not properly verify the resident's identity before administering the IV. The incident report and interviews revealed that the trainee nurse asked the resident her name, but did not verify her first and last name, birthdate, or picture in the medication administration record. The Director of Nursing and the preceptor nurse were informed of the mistake after the IV was administered. The facility's guidelines require contacting a physician or nurse practitioner for specific orders before administering IV hydration and micronutrient therapy, which was not done in this case. The resident's progress notes documented the bruise, and the resident's Power of Attorney was informed of the incident the following day.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 142 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 9 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Peoria
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apostolic Christian Skylines | 0.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Arcadia Care Peoria Heights | 1.1 mi | — | 9 | 0 |
| Goldwater Care Peoria Heights | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 25 | 3 |
| Lutheran Hillside Village | 1.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Loft Rehab Of Peoria, The | 1.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Accolade Healthcare Of Peoria.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.