Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Lantern Park Specialty Care during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple psychiatric diagnoses underwent changes in psychotropic medications without documented education or informed consent from the resident or their representative. The facility's records showed only an attempted phone notification to the family, with no follow-up or signed consent form, and the facility's policy did not address informed consent requirements for such medication changes.
A resident with Alzheimer's dementia was admitted to hospice care, but the facility did not complete the required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a significant change in status within the mandated timeframe, as confirmed by staff and clinical record review.
Quarterly MDS assessments were not completed within the required 92-day timeframe for three residents, with gaps ranging from 95 to 142 days between assessments. Staffing changes and reliance on a corporate support team contributed to the delays, and the issue was not self-identified by the facility during the survey.
A resident did not receive safe and appropriate respiratory care when needed, as required by their condition.
Staff did not deliver care or services in a manner that was trauma informed or culturally competent, failing to meet required standards for addressing residents' trauma histories or cultural needs.
Multiple residents experienced significant delays in call light response, with staff taking between 17 and 40 minutes to respond to requests for assistance. These delays were confirmed through direct observation and resident interviews, despite the administrator's stated expectation that call lights be answered in under 15 minutes.
Two residents requiring substantial assistance for bathing did not consistently receive the scheduled two showers per week, as confirmed by documentation, resident interviews, and staff observations. Both residents, who were cognitively intact, reported infrequent showers, and one exhibited physical signs of inadequate hygiene. The administrator acknowledged that all residents should receive showers twice weekly.
The facility failed to administer medications as prescribed to several residents due to insufficient staffing. Residents with conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, and heart disease missed critical doses of medications like Metoprolol, Digoxin, and insulin. Staff A, a registered nurse, cited a lack of help as the reason for these omissions, which were documented in the residents' MARs and progress notes.
A resident with intact cognition alleged physical abuse, claiming she was hit in the head, causing her glasses to fall off. The facility's investigation was insufficient, as it did not include interviews with staff present during the incident. The Interim Administrator was informed through hospital notes and notified authorities, but there was uncertainty about the completeness of staff interviews. The facility's policy requires thorough investigations, which was not met.
A facility failed to obtain physician orders for supplemental oxygen for a resident with COPD and asthma, leading to undocumented oxygen use. Additionally, another resident missed multiple medication doses due to staffing shortages, with the nurse failing to report the issue to management. The facility's policies and job descriptions were not followed, resulting in deficiencies in care.
A resident with COPD, respiratory failure, and anxiety, requiring moderate assistance with daily living activities, did not receive scheduled baths as per their care plan. Despite a system in place for assigning bath days, the facility failed to provide the necessary hygiene care, with documentation showing only one bath in August and none in September.
A resident with a fall risk and a periprosthetic fracture was injured due to inadequate supervision during ambulation. A CNA failed to use a gait belt, contrary to the care plan and facility policy, resulting in the resident falling and sustaining a non-operable fracture of the right hip. The incident was witnessed by another CNA in training.
A resident with multiple diagnoses required substantial assistance for transfers, but the facility failed to update their care plan to reflect the use of a sit-to-stand lift instead of a front-wheeled walker. Staff interviews confirmed the use of the lift for four months, but the therapy department was not informed, leading to a deficiency in care planning and communication.
A resident with hemiplegia required a mechanical lift for transfers, but staff failed to secure the shin strap due to a missing buckle, leading to unsafe transfer practices. The resident's leg position during the transfer was concerning, and staff training on the use of the lift was inconsistent.
The facility staff failed to treat residents with respect and dignity, as evidenced by incidents involving four residents. A resident with cancer was told by an LPN that he was going to die, causing distress. Another resident was left on the toilet for 20 minutes, feeling scared and uncertain. A third resident reported poor call light response times, leading to incontinence and feelings of unimportance. Additionally, two CNAs were rude to a resident, refusing to assist with toileting. These incidents highlight a pattern of disrespect and inadequate care.
A resident with intact cognition was not informed about changes to her medications or treatment plan, despite facility policies requiring such communication. Staff confirmed that residents with high BIMS scores should be informed, but notifications were only made to the resident's power of attorney, who was not enacted. This lack of communication deviated from the facility's policies on resident rights and dignity.
The facility did not submit complete PBJ data for agency staff during the second quarter, affecting CMS's staffing information. The PBJ report showed a one-star staff rating and low weekend staffing. The Administrator acknowledged the omission of agency staff data, contrary to the facility's policy requiring inclusion of all direct-care staff.
A facility failed to update the PASRR evaluation for a resident with new diagnoses, including Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia and delusional disorders. The resident's care plan was based on an outdated assessment from 2021, and despite new diagnoses documented in the electronic health record, no updated PASRR evaluation was conducted. The facility lacked a specific policy for PASRR completion, relying instead on general regulations.
A resident with a history of falls and multiple diagnoses fell in the shower room, resulting in a nondisplaced fracture of the proximal right femoral neck. The incident occurred because the CNA did not use a gait belt and the resident was not wearing shoes, contrary to the facility's policy and standard practice.
A resident with hypertension, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and orthostatic hypotension fell in the shower room and complained of significant pain in her right hip and pelvis. Despite the resident's inability to flex her right hip and her complaints of pain, an agency nurse used a mechanical lift to place the resident in a wheelchair and took her to her room instead of seeking immediate medical treatment, resulting in inadequate care.
Failure to Obtain Informed Consent for Psychotropic Medication Changes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to educate a resident and/or their representative and obtain informed consent prior to making two changes in psychotropic medications for a resident with severe cognitive impairment. The resident had diagnoses including PTSD, depression, and adjustment disorder, and was being treated with multiple psychotropic medications. The care plan included interventions to educate the resident, family, and caregivers about the risks, benefits, and side effects of antidepressant medications. However, when the physician ordered a decrease in duloxetine and initiation and titration of sertraline, there was no documented evidence that informed consent was obtained from the resident or their representative prior to implementing these changes. Review of the electronic health record showed an attempt to notify the resident's wife by leaving a message, but there was no follow-up communication documented to confirm that the representative was informed about the medication changes. Additionally, the facility's provided policy did not address the need for informed consent prior to changes in psychotropic medications, and the informed consent form for the new antidepressant remained unsigned. Staff interviews confirmed that the expectation was for a signed informed consent document to be present when medication changes occurred, but this was not completed in this case.
Failure to Complete Significant Change MDS After Hospice Admission
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a significant change in status after a resident was admitted to hospice care. Clinical record review showed that a physician order was entered indicating the resident began receiving hospice services for Alzheimer's dementia. According to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, an MDS assessment for a significant change in status must be completed within 14 days of determining the change, and specifically when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice program. Staff interview confirmed that the resident started hospice services, but the required significant change MDS assessment was not completed as mandated.
Failure to Complete Timely Quarterly MDS Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the required timeframe for three residents. Clinical record reviews showed that for one resident, there was a 142-day gap between the admission MDS assessment and the first quarterly assessment. For another resident, there was a 133-day interval between two quarterly assessments, and for a third resident, the gap between quarterly assessments was 95 days. According to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, assessments must be completed no later than 92 days after the previous assessment. Interviews with the new MDS Coordinator and the Administrator revealed that the facility had experienced staffing changes, with the corporate support team intermittently handling MDS assessments while a new Coordinator was being hired. The MDS Coordinator described the process for completing assessments and acknowledged that quarterly assessments should be completed within 92 days. The Administrator confirmed that the previous Coordinator was responsible for the missed assessments, and the new Coordinator had been working to correct identified errors. The facility did not indicate on the Self Identification form that MDS corrections were an ongoing issue.
Failure to Provide Safe and Appropriate Respiratory Care
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified regarding the provision of safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed. The report indicates that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received necessary respiratory care, as required by their condition. Specific details about the actions or inactions of staff, the resident's medical history, or the circumstances at the time of the deficiency are not provided in the report excerpt.
Failure to Provide Trauma-Informed and Culturally Competent Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide care or services that were trauma informed and/or culturally competent. This deficiency indicates that staff did not consider or incorporate trauma-informed approaches or cultural competence in the delivery of care or services to residents, as required. The report does not specify the number of residents affected or provide details about their medical history or condition at the time of the deficiency.
Delayed Call Light Response Times
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely responses to resident call lights, as evidenced by multiple observations and resident interviews. Three separate instances were documented where call lights remained unanswered for periods ranging from 17 to 35 minutes. Residents reported that it routinely took staff over 15 minutes, and in some cases up to 40 minutes, to respond to their requests for assistance. These delays were directly observed by surveyors, who noted specific times when call lights were activated and the length of time before staff entered the rooms. The facility census at the time was 86 residents, and the administrator confirmed that the expectation was for call lights to be answered in less than 15 minutes.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Bathing Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide at least two baths per week for two of three residents reviewed, despite both residents being assessed as requiring substantial or maximal assistance for showering. Clinical record reviews showed that both residents were scheduled for showers twice weekly, but documentation revealed that the actual number of showers received was inconsistent and often less than scheduled. One resident, with intact cognition and a care plan indicating the need for one-person assistance, reported not receiving showers very often, and records confirmed missed showers over several months. Another resident, also cognitively intact and requiring similar assistance, stated that staff were slow to provide showers and reported not having had a shower for over a week, with physical signs such as greasy hair and slight body odor observed during the survey. Interviews with both residents corroborated the documentation findings, as they expressed concerns about the infrequency of showers. The administrator confirmed that all residents should be receiving showers twice a week, as per facility policy. The deficiency was identified through a combination of clinical record review, resident interviews, and staff interviews, highlighting a failure to consistently provide scheduled bathing assistance to residents unable to perform activities of daily living independently.
Medication Administration Errors Due to Staffing Issues
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors, affecting six out of ten residents reviewed for medication administration. The errors were primarily due to missed medication doses, as indicated by the residents' Medication Administration Records (MARs) and progress notes. The MARs for several residents showed multiple morning medications marked with a code indicating they were not administered, and progress notes consistently cited a lack of sufficient help as the reason for these omissions. Resident #3, with severely impaired cognition, missed a dose of Metoprolol Succinate for hypertension. Similarly, Resident #15, who had cardiovascular issues, missed a dose of Digoxin. Both cases were attributed to insufficient staffing, as noted by Staff A, a registered nurse. The facility's daily staffing sheet confirmed that only two nurses and one Certified Medication Aide were scheduled for the shift, which was inadequate to meet the residents' needs. Other residents, including those with diabetes, coronary artery disease, and hypertension, also missed critical medications such as insulin, Metoprolol, Furosemide, and Eliquis. These omissions were documented in the progress notes, with Staff A repeatedly citing a lack of help as the cause. Despite notifying providers of the medication errors, no new orders were received, indicating a lack of immediate corrective action. The facility's policy on administering medications, which requires medications to be given as per prescriber orders, was not adhered to, leading to these significant medication errors.
Inadequate Investigation of Abuse Allegation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical abuse involving a resident with intact cognition, as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. The resident alleged that during the overnight hours, she was hit in the head, causing her glasses to fall off. The incident was reported several days later due to the resident's illness. The facility conducted interviews with other residents and staff, but the investigation lacked thoroughness as it did not include statements from staff who worked during the time of the alleged incident. Additionally, the facility's documentation did not provide sufficient information related to the alleged abuse. The Interim Facility Administrator was made aware of the allegation through hospital notes and took steps to notify relevant authorities. However, there was uncertainty about whether all necessary staff interviews had been conducted. The facility's investigation summary indicated no concerns were noted from the interviews conducted, but it did not address the specific details of the alleged incident. The facility's policy on abuse and neglect requires a thorough investigation to clarify events and identify possible causes, which was not adequately fulfilled in this case.
Deficiencies in Oxygen Administration and Medication Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain physician orders for the use of supplemental oxygen for a resident diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and asthma. Despite the resident experiencing low oxygen saturation levels, the care plan did not include interventions related to oxygen use, and the Medication and Treatment Administration Record (MAR/TAR) lacked orders for supplemental oxygen. Nursing staff applied oxygen based on their judgment, and a verbal order was received but not documented in the MAR/TAR. The facility's policy required a physician's order for oxygen administration, which was not followed. Another deficiency involved the failure to administer medications as ordered for a resident on a specific date. Multiple morning and afternoon medication doses were omitted due to insufficient staffing, as noted by a registered nurse. The resident's MAR indicated missed doses, and progress notes confirmed the omissions were due to a lack of help. The facility's staffing sheet showed that only two nurses and one Certified Medication Aide were scheduled for the shift, and the nurse involved did not report the issue to the Regional Director of Clinical Services or the Regional Director of Operations. The facility's Regional Director of Clinical Services and Regional Director of Operations were present on the day of the medication omissions but were not informed of the staffing issues by the nurse. The nurse acknowledged not completing all tasks and requested to return the following day. The Charge Nurse-RN Job Description required compliance with rules and regulations, ensuring residents received necessary care, which was not adhered to in this instance.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Bathing Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate bathing assistance to a resident, identified as Resident #1, who required moderate assistance with activities of daily living, including bathing. The resident, who had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment, was diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), respiratory failure, and anxiety. According to the care plan initiated on August 12, 2024, the resident was to receive assistance with baths twice a week, specifically on Mondays and Thursdays. However, documentation revealed that the resident only received one bath on August 29, 2024, and there was no documentation of baths provided in September. Interviews with facility staff, including registered nurses and certified nurse assistants, confirmed that residents are generally scheduled to receive baths twice a week, with a designated bath aide responsible for this task. If bath aides are unavailable, certified nursing assistants are expected to complete the baths. The staff also mentioned a system of assigning bath days based on room numbers, and a master list is used to track which residents need baths. Despite these procedures, the facility failed to adhere to the care plan for Resident #1, resulting in a deficiency in providing necessary hygiene care.
Failure to Use Gait Belt Leads to Resident Fall and Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate supervision during ambulation for a resident, resulting in an injury. The resident, who had no cognitive impairment, was identified as having a fall risk due to a periprosthetic fracture of the left hip joint. The care plan required staff to assist the resident with a front-wheeled walker and a wheelchair for mobility, and to use a gait belt during transfers. However, on the day of the incident, a CNA assisted the resident to the bathroom without using a gait belt, which was against the facility's policy. The CNA, who was responsible for the resident's care, admitted to not using a gait belt because she left it in her locker. Instead, she held onto the resident's pants to assist him. During the transfer, the CNA removed the resident's oxygen and turned away from him, leaving him unsupported. As a result, the resident fell in the bathroom, sustaining a fracture to the right hip, which was confirmed by an x-ray as a non-operable fracture of the greater trochanter. The incident was witnessed by another CNA in training, who observed the resident fall after taking a few steps on his own. The facility's policy required the use of gait belts for safe resident transfers, and the CNA involved in the incident had previously been warned for similar infractions. The failure to adhere to the care plan and facility policies directly contributed to the resident's fall and subsequent injury.
Failure to Update Resident Care Plan for Transfer Method
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to update the care plan of a resident to reflect their current level of functioning, leading to a deficiency. The resident, who had diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, legal blindness, lack of coordination, and muscle weakness, required substantial assistance for transfers and ambulation and was totally dependent on staff for toileting. The care plan, last revised in March 2024, indicated the resident should be transferred using a front-wheeled walker with the assistance of two staff members. However, observations and staff interviews revealed that the resident had been transferred using a sit-to-stand mechanical lift (EZ Stand) for the past four months, contrary to the care plan instructions. Interviews with various staff members, including CNAs and LPNs, confirmed the use of the EZ Stand for transfers, which was not documented in the care plan. The therapy department, responsible for assessing and recommending transfer methods, was not informed of the change in the resident's transfer method and did not receive a request for re-evaluation. The Director of Nurses and MDS Coordinators acknowledged the discrepancy between the care plan and the actual transfer method used, indicating a breakdown in communication and documentation processes within the facility.
Deficiency in Safe Transfer Using Mechanical Lift
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to safely transfer a resident who required a mechanical lift, resulting in a deficiency. The resident, who had no cognitive impairment and was diagnosed with conditions including cerebrovascular accident, hypertension, and hemiplegia, required total assistance for transfers and toileting. The care plan specified the use of a sit-to-stand mechanical lift (E-Z Stand) with assistance from one staff member. However, during an observation, a CNA used the lift without securing the shin strap, which lacked a buckle, and transferred the resident to the bathroom. The resident's left leg was observed to remain straight and tilted back during the transfer, which was noted by a Physical Therapy Aide as a concern. Staff interviews revealed that one CNA had not been trained to buckle the leg harness, while another CNA was aware of the requirement but noted the strap was missing a buckle. The facility had three E-Z Stand lifts, one of which had a broken shin strap. The Director of Nursing confirmed the necessity of applying the leg strap during transfers. The mechanical lift manual indicated the importance of securing the shin strap to keep the patient's legs on the foot plate, highlighting the deficiency in the transfer process.
Failure to Respect Resident Dignity and Timely Response to Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to treat residents with respect and dignity, as evidenced by multiple incidents involving four residents. Resident #78, who had a diagnosis of cancer, reported being mistreated by a nurse, Staff A, who told him he was going to die from his cancer. This conversation was corroborated by an audio recording and other staff members, leading to the termination of Staff A. The incident left Resident #78 upset and angry, highlighting a lack of sensitivity and respect in communication with residents. Resident #13, who had moderately impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for toileting, reported being left on the toilet for 20 minutes, causing her to feel scared and uncertain about when staff would return. Staff interviews revealed that call lights were not always answered promptly, especially during busy times, indicating a systemic issue with staff availability and response times. This delay in assistance compromised the resident's dignity and sense of security. Resident #86, with intact cognition and a history of fractures, reported poor response times to call lights, particularly during evenings and weekends. She experienced incontinence due to delayed assistance, which made her feel unimportant. Additionally, Resident #4 reported rude behavior from two CNAs who refused to assist him with toileting, telling him to try to wipe himself. This incident was confirmed through interviews and led to a grievance being filed. These events collectively demonstrate a pattern of disrespect and inadequate care, affecting the residents' dignity and well-being.
Failure to Inform Resident of Medication Changes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents were fully informed and involved in their treatment plans, specifically in the case of one resident with intact cognition. This resident, who had diagnoses of cancer, anxiety, and heart failure, reported that nurses did not explain changes to her medications or the reasons for these changes. Despite having a high score on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition, the resident was not informed about new medications or changes to her treatment plan. The facility's documentation showed that notifications about medication changes were made to the resident's power of attorney, even though the resident was decisional and the power of attorney had not been enacted. Interviews with staff and the facility administrator confirmed that residents with high BIMS scores should have medication changes explained to them, and that the resident's brother was involved in care conferences by choice, not necessity. The facility's policies emphasized the importance of informing residents about their health status and respecting their dignity and choices. However, the lack of communication with the resident about her medications and treatment plan was a clear deviation from these policies, as evidenced by the absence of documentation showing the resident's involvement in care plan conferences and medication discussions.
Incomplete PBJ Data Submission for Agency Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to submit complete payroll data for agency staff during the second quarter of the current fiscal year, impacting the accuracy of staffing information reported to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for Fiscal Year 2024 Quarter 2 indicated a one-star staff rating and excessively low weekend staffing. Upon review, the Administrator provided staff schedules for March, which included both facility and agency staff. However, during an interview, the Administrator admitted that the PBJ data submitted did not include agency staff, acknowledging the impact on CMS's data for the facility. The facility's policy on Reporting Direct-Care Staffing Information, revised in October 2017, required the inclusion of staff hired directly by the facility, through an agency, and contract employees.
Failure to Update PASRR Evaluation for Resident with New Diagnoses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete an updated Pre-Admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) evaluation for a resident with a new diagnosis. The resident, identified as Resident #13, had a history of Parkinson's disease, psychotic disorder, PTSD, and delirium due to a known physiological condition. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) review revealed that the resident had moderately impaired cognition, scoring 10/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The resident's care plan, which included focus areas and interventions for PASRR, was based on an assessment completed prior to admission on 7/9/21. The PASRR outcome from 7/7/21 indicated no Level II was required at that time, as there were no neurocognitive disorders or recent mental health symptoms noted. However, the resident's electronic health record later documented new diagnoses, including Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia dated 10/1/23, delusional disorders dated 11/3/23, and delirium due to a known physiological condition dated 3/15/24. Despite these new diagnoses, the facility did not conduct an updated PASRR evaluation. An email from the Administrator on 8/1/24 confirmed that the facility lacked a specific policy for PASRR completion and relied solely on following regulations. An interview with the Administrator further revealed that the only documentation of a completed PASRR assessment for this resident was from 2021, indicating a failure to update the evaluation in light of the resident's new diagnoses.
Failure to Provide Appropriate Supervision and Use of Gait Belt
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate supervision to ensure the safety of a resident, leading to a fall incident. The resident, who had diagnoses including hypertension, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and orthostatic hypotension, was identified as being at risk for falls. The care plan included interventions such as encouraging proper footwear and monitoring for an unsteady gait, as well as requiring assistance from one person for various activities of daily living. However, during a bathing session, the resident fell in the shower room, resulting in a nondisplaced fracture of the proximal right femoral neck. The incident occurred because the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) did not use a gait belt and the resident was not wearing shoes, contrary to the facility's policy and standard practice as explained by the Director of Nursing (DON). The CNA admitted that she did not have a gait belt on the resident and that the resident was not wearing shoes at the time of the fall. The facility's policy on safe lifting and movement of residents, which was last revised in July 2017, directed staff to use manual lifting devices such as gait belts. The DON confirmed that it is standard practice to use a gait belt and to have hands on the gait belt at all times when assisting a resident. The failure to adhere to these protocols directly led to the resident's fall and subsequent injury.
Failure to Provide Appropriate Post-Fall Assessment and Intervention
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete an accurate assessment and provide appropriate intervention after a fall for a resident diagnosed with hypertension, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and orthostatic hypotension. The resident, who required assistance with activities of daily living, fell in the shower room and complained of significant pain in her right hip and pelvis. Despite the resident's inability to flex her right hip and her complaints of pain, the agency nurse used a mechanical lift to place the resident in a wheelchair and took her to her room instead of seeking immediate medical treatment as per the facility's policy on assessing falls and their causes. A subsequent CT scan revealed a nondisplaced fracture of the proximal right femoral neck. The facility's policy directs staff to provide first aid and obtain medical treatment immediately if there is evidence of an injury after a fall. However, the agency nurse's decision to use a mechanical lift and place the resident in a wheelchair without seeking immediate medical attention demonstrated poor judgment and a failure to adhere to the facility's policy, resulting in inadequate care for the resident after the fall.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 270 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Coralville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Windmill Manor | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 12 | 0 |
| Oaknoll Retirement Residence | 4.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Briarwood Healthcare Center | 4.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Iowa City Rehab & Health Care | 6.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 27 | 0 |
| Solon Nursing Care Center | 8.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Lantern Park Specialty Care.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.