Citations in Iowa
Statistics, citations and compliance trends for long-term care facilities in Iowa.
Statistics for Iowa (Last 12 Months)
Financial Impact (Last 12 Months)
Latest citations in Iowa
Food Storage and Personal Hygiene Deficiencies: A Cook was observed preparing food without required hair or beard covering, and multiple food items in the freezer, refrigerators, and kitchenette were found without open dates. Surveyors also found expired Greek yogurt in the walk-in refrigerator. The CDM stated items should be labeled with open dates and expired items discarded, while the facility policy required food service staff to wear a hair net or appropriate hair covering during food production and clean-up.
Improper Thawing of Frozen Chicken: Staff thawed frozen breaded chicken in a 3-compartment sink without cold running water instead of using an approved defrosting method. A Cook said she removed the chicken from the freezer about an hour earlier, and the DM confirmed the chicken was thawed in the sink after staff forgot to remove it from refrigeration earlier. The facility's policy required thawing in refrigeration, under running water, in a microwave under specific conditions, or as part of the conventional cooking process.
Failure to Notify PCP and Family of Significant Weight Loss: A resident experienced significant weight loss after admission, with weights showing a marked decline over time and no weight-loss interventions in the care plan. Nursing and dietary notes documented continued monitoring and notification of the RD, but there was no documentation that the PCP or resident representative was notified about the 9.2% loss in 30 days, and the record lacked further weight-related follow-up.
A resident with severe dementia and behavioral symptoms received Seroquel with multiple dose increases, but the orders did not include a documented diagnosis to justify use or escalation. The chart showed dementia, agitation, and later psychosis documentation, while staff described the resident as generally directable and pleasant with more evening behaviors. The resident also had falls during the stay, including one that led to ER transfer.
Incorrect MDS Coding for Catheter Status: A resident’s MDS was coded as if the resident used a catheter and had urinary leakage, but the TAR had no documentation or physician orders supporting catheter use. The resident stated no catheter had been used since admission, and the MDS Coordinator acknowledged the assessment was coded incorrectly and that the resident did not currently have a catheter.
RN Coverage Not Maintained on Scheduled Shifts: The facility failed to ensure an RN was present for 8 consecutive hours each day. Review of schedules and timecards showed LPNs covered the shifts on two dates when no RN was scheduled, and staff interviews confirmed the facility had difficulty hiring nurses and relied on last-minute coverage. The facility reported a census of 49 residents on one date and 50 residents on another, including 3 residents receiving Medicare skilled services.
Food Storage and Personal Hygiene Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to meet professional standards for food storage and personal hygiene during observations of the kitchen and refrigeration areas. On 8/10/26 from 8:10 AM to 9:30 AM, Staff B, the Cook, was observed not wearing a hair or beard net while working. During the same observation, Freezer #1 contained multiple food items without open dates, including cheese ravioli, salmon patties, onion rings, sweet potato fries, wings, and chicken strips. The double-door refrigerator also contained numerous undated items, including several dressings and sauces, lettuce, lime juice, stuffed queen olives, banana pepper rings, soy sauce, teriyaki sauce, sweet and sour sauce, and red hot wing sauce. The walk-in refrigerator contained additional items without open dates, including strawberry yogurt, lettuce, almond frosting, pepperoni slices, ice cream, and tilapia. The walk-in refrigerator also contained five 32-ounce containers of Greek yogurt that had expired on 7/29/26. On 8/11/26 at 10:36 AM, Staff B was observed wearing a baseball cap and beard net while preparing food. Later that day at 11:25 AM, the refrigerator in the small kitchenette contained undated whole milk, fat-free milk, and 2% milk. Staff A, the Certified Dietary Manager, stated that items were expected to be labeled with an open date and expired items were to be discarded once expired, and she said she would need to review the facility policy regarding hair and beard nets because she believed short hair did not require a hairnet. The facility’s personal hygiene policy required food service staff involved in food production and clean-up to wear a hair net or appropriate hair covering, and the labeling and dating policy required all prepared, opened, stored, or repackaged food items to be properly labeled and dated, with improperly labeled, undated, expired, or unidentifiable items not served and discarded.
Improper Thawing of Frozen Chicken
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to thaw frozen chicken using an approved method of defrosting. During an initial kitchen walkthrough, surveyors observed 3 bags of frozen breaded chicken leg drums sitting in a 3-compartment sink without cold running water. A later observation showed the same chicken bags placed in a basin inside the 3-compartment sink, again without cold water. Staff A, Cook, stated she had removed the chicken from the freezer about an hour earlier and was thawing it in the sink. The lunch menu for that day documented chicken drumsticks. The Dietary Manager acknowledged that Staff A thawed the frozen breaded chicken in the 3-compartment sink. The DM stated kitchen staff had forgotten to remove the chicken from the refrigerator earlier and reported that staff were expected to thaw chicken in the refrigerator or under cold running water. The DM also noted a small hole in the chicken bag and stated staff did not want the breaded chicken to get wet. The Administrator stated dietary staff were expected to thaw frozen chicken in the refrigerator or under cold running water. The facility's Food Preparation Policy required frozen meats and leftovers to be thawed only by approved methods, including refrigeration, running water, microwave under specific conditions, or as part of the conventional cooking process.
Failure to Notify PCP and Family of Significant Weight Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to assess the cause of a significant weight loss and failed to notify the PCP and resident representative for Resident #8. The resident’s MDS documented admission to the facility on 5/29/26 with a weight of 182 lbs. and identified significant weight loss without a physician-prescribed weight loss regimen. The resident’s weight log showed weights of 210.8 lbs. on 5/29/26, 207.6 lbs. on 5/31/26, 195.8 lbs. on 6/7/26, 178 lbs. on 6/25/26, 180.4 lbs. on 7/5/26, 179.6 lbs. on 7/26/26, 174.6 lbs. on 8/2/26, and 176.8 lbs. on 8/9/26, reflecting a 16.1% weight loss since admission. The care plan lacked interventions related to weight loss. The Nutrition/Dietary Progress Note on 6/7/26 documented a 4.5% weight loss since admission and stated staff would continue monitoring weight. A later note on 6/17/26 documented transfer to a short-term medical facility, and a note on 6/25/26 documented return from the hospital. The Nutrition/Dietary Progress Note on 7/15/26 documented a 9.2% weight loss in 30 days, noted no nutritional supplements were provided, stated staff would continue monitoring, and documented that the Dietitian was notified. The progress notes did not document notification of the PCP or resident representative regarding the 9.2% weight loss, and they lacked further documentation addressing weight.
Antipsychotic Use Lacked Documented Diagnosis Support
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that one resident receiving antipsychotic medication had diagnoses documented to support the use of Seroquel and the medication’s ongoing dose increases. Resident #19 had severe cognitive impairment on the MDS, with disorganized thinking, fluctuating behavior, delusions, and intermittent verbal and nonverbal behavioral symptoms. The resident’s documented active diagnoses included non-Alzheimer’s dementia, atrial fibrillation, and COPD, but the MDS did not list any psychiatric or mood disorder diagnoses, and the physician’s orders for Seroquel 25 mg at 3:00 PM and 100 mg at supper did not include a diagnosis for use. The record showed that the resident’s psychotropic consent form listed dementia with psychotic behavior and irritability as the reason for Seroquel, along with expected benefits and potential adverse effects. Later documentation showed repeated requests for gradual dose reduction were declined because the resident continued to have increased agitation. The physician then ordered additional Seroquel doses, including 12.5 mg in the morning and 25 mg at noon for increased afternoon and evening behaviors, and later increased the afternoon dose to 50 mg for anxiety and agitation, but these orders also did not include a diagnosis supporting the medication changes. The resident experienced falls during the stay, including an unwitnessed morning fall and a later fall with possible left hip external rotation and increased pain that resulted in transfer to the emergency room. Staff interviews described the resident as confused but fairly functional, directable, pleasant, and sometimes upset or yelling, with behaviors more noticeable in the evening. The EHR later added a diagnosis of unspecified psychosis, and the physician’s final report documented psychosis and stated the resident did not experience hallucinations currently due to medication control, but the deficiency cited that the facility had not ensured the antipsychotic use and dose escalation were supported by documented diagnoses at the time of the orders.
Incorrect MDS Coding for Catheter Status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one resident reviewed for catheter use. The resident’s MDS documented a catheter, independence with toileting hygiene and toileting transfers, frequent involuntary urine leakage, and no active urinary system conditions, while the resident had a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognition. However, the Treatment Administration Record for June and July 2026 lacked documentation or physician orders related to catheter use. During interview, the resident stated not having used a catheter since residing at the facility. The MDS Coordinator stated the resident does not currently maintain and has not maintained a catheter, and acknowledged the July MDS was coded incorrectly. The facility’s Comprehensive Assessments policy directed staff to complete assessments in accordance with the RAI User Manual and to complete a significant correction when a prior assessment contains a significant error resulting in a miscoded resident status or inappropriate care plan.
RN Coverage Not Maintained on Scheduled Shifts
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an RN was in the facility for eight consecutive hours seven days a week. Based on review of nursing schedules, time detail reports, and staff interviews, the facility had shifts covered by LPNs on 5/24/26 and 7/5/26 without an RN scheduled. On 5/24/26, Staff D, an LPN, worked from 4:57 AM to 5:31 PM and Staff E, an LPN, worked from 4:55 PM to 5:26 AM the next day, and the schedule lacked an RN. On 7/5/26, Staff D, an LPN, worked from 5:02 AM to 5:20 PM and Staff F, an LPN, worked from 5:00 PM to 5:19 AM the next day, and the schedule again lacked an RN. The facility reported a census of 49 residents on 5/24/26 and 50 residents on 7/5/26, including 3 residents receiving Medicare Skilled services. The DON stated the facility was unable to hire nurses, and the Administrator stated the staffing agency did not notify the facility when an RN called off and that coverage was often obtained at the last minute.
Find your facility
Search by name to see its inspection history, citations and penalties — and how to prepare for the next survey.
Get alerted when Immediate Jeopardy citations hit in Iowa — free
You're all set
Compliance trends in Iowa
Data through Jul 2026Comparisons below measure the most recent period Aug 2025 – Jul 2026 against the prior period Aug 2024 – Jul 2025 (two equal 12-month windows). The most recent 1 months are excluded because CMS is still publishing them.
Top tags by month · last 24 months
dashed = still reportingMonthly citation counts for the 5 most-cited tags. The dashed tail is the 1-month reporting lag.
Frequency movers
Biggest change in how often each tag is cited, as a rate per 100 inspections (so it isn't skewed by survey volume): Aug 2025 – Jul 2026 vs the prior period Aug 2024 – Jul 2025. Only tags with at least 20 citations in both periods are shown.
Severity movers
Tags whose average scope/severity shifted the most: Aug 2025 – Jul 2026 vs the prior period Aug 2024 – Jul 2025. The number is the average severity on the A–L scale (A=0…L=11); the letter is the band it falls in. A rise means the same tag is being cited at a more serious level — note the average can move enough to rank here while staying within the same letter. Same 20-citation minimum applies.
Care domain movers
Citations grouped into CFR care domains — F-tags by their §483 regulatory section (CMS State Operations Manual, Appendix PP) — measured as a rate per 100 inspections: Aug 2025 – Jul 2026 vs the prior period Aug 2024 – Jul 2025. Share is the domain's portion of citations this period; avg severity is the mean scope/severity letter and immediate jeopardy the percentage cited at J–L, both over the current period. Domains with at least 20 citations in both periods are shown; the sparkline tracks the last 12 months (left = oldest).
Immediate jeopardies · this period
Citations at the most serious scope/severity — J–L, immediate jeopardy, residents placed at risk of serious harm or death — over Aug 2025 – Jul 2026 vs the prior period Aug 2024 – Jul 2025. "Surveys with an IJ" counts distinct health inspections that had at least one.
Survey activity · by month
faded/dashed = still reportingCitations each month split into complaint-driven (unscheduled, triggered by grievances) vs standard surveys — bars, left axis — with the number of inspections as a line on the right axis. Rising inspections signal more scrutiny; a rising complaint share means more off-cycle surveys. The most recent 1 months are still being reported.
Deficiency-free survey rate
Share of health surveys that found zero deficiencies — the odds of a clean survey. Aug 2025 – Jul 2026 vs the prior period Aug 2024 – Jul 2025; the most recent 1 months are still being reported (dashed).
Penalties · by month
faded = still reportingTotal civil money penalty dollars imposed on the state's facilities each month — how hard the state is enforcing. The most recent 1 months are still being reported, and penalties often lag citations by several months.
Emerging tags
Tags that weren't established last period but surged — an early warning, distinct from movers (which track already-common tags). Criteria: fewer than 20 citations in the prior period, but at least 10 this period and 2.5× their prior volume. The sparkline shows monthly counts over the last 12 months (left = oldest).
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.
