Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Nella's At Autumn Lake Healthcare during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility did not employ a Certified Dietary Manager with proper credentials and lacked a full-time RD, with the RD only present once weekly and otherwise available remotely. The FSM could not provide a staffing policy, and the contracted food service company did not supply the requested documentation. Additionally, not all Nutrition Services Staff had the required food handler certifications, with only a portion of certificates available for review.
Surveyors identified multiple failures in food storage, preparation, and equipment sanitation, including improper labeling and dating of food items, storing disposable utensils and food directly on the floor, and lack of a cleaning schedule for kitchen equipment. These deficiencies had the potential to affect all residents in the facility.
Paper towels were not available at two kitchen handwashing sinks, as observed during a survey walkthrough. The Food Services Manager confirmed that dispensers had not been refilled, resulting in the use of a cleaning towel for hand drying. This lapse in infection control had the potential to impact all residents in the facility.
Two residents reported that shower water was not warm enough for comfortable use, with measured temperatures significantly below the facility's target range. Observations also found poor cleanliness and improper storage of personal hygiene items in the shower rooms, including dirty towels and wash rags left on surfaces and floors, contrary to facility policy.
A deficiency was cited due to the facility's failure to keep an area free from accident hazards and to provide sufficient supervision to prevent accidents. The report highlights that the environment did not meet required safety standards, but does not specify further details about those affected.
Several residents did not receive individualized care plans, with generic interventions failing to reflect their specific interests, diagnoses, or needs. Care plans for activities, depression, PTSD, and pain management were incomplete or not updated, and scheduled one-to-one visits were often missed. Staff interviews revealed a lack of interdisciplinary collaboration and insufficient resident involvement in care planning.
The facility did not include residents, responsible parties, or the full interdisciplinary team in care plan meetings, and failed to update care plans when new medications were added. Two residents with intact cognition were unaware of their care plans, and documentation lacked evidence of proper meeting attendance or resident involvement.
Surveyors observed that meals were being served on wet plates because the dishwasher was out of dry assist, resulting in improper drying. The Certified Dietary Manager confirmed the issue and acknowledged the potential for bacterial contamination due to the use of wet plates during meal service.
The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records, including incomplete POST forms lacking required signatures, failure to follow up on ABNs with written documentation after verbal consent, and incorrect admission weight documentation for a resident. Staff interviews revealed a lack of official processes for obtaining and documenting required consents, resulting in incomplete records for several residents.
Surveyors found that a resident's bathroom was not kept clean or comfortable, with dried substances around the toilet, a sticky floor, and a strong urine odor. The Housekeeping Supervisor confirmed the unsanitary conditions.
A resident was transferred to a hospital following a fall, altered mental status, and high blood glucose, but the facility did not document which required transfer documents were sent with the resident. Although a transfer checklist was signed by a nurse and ambulance staff, none of the items were checked to indicate what information was provided to the hospital.
A resident's electronic health record listed diagnoses of anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and PTSD, but the most recent MDS assessment only documented PTSD, omitting the other two conditions. The DON confirmed this assessment error during the survey.
Surveyors found that the facility did not update PASARR documentation to reflect new mental health diagnoses for two residents. In both cases, the residents' EHRs listed conditions such as PTSD, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder, but these were not accurately recorded on the PASARR forms. The DON and Social Worker confirmed the discrepancies between the EHR, MDS, and PASARR documentation.
Feeding tubes were utilized for a resident without clear medical justification or documented consent, and appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube was not provided as required.
A resident with PTSD, anxiety, and major depressive disorder was not provided with appropriate social services, as the facility failed to assess for PTSD triggers, include representative input, or make referrals for psychological evaluation. The care plan and social service notes did not address the resident's mental health diagnoses, and staff interviews confirmed these omissions.
Staff failed to follow infection control protocols in two cases: a nurse used bare hands to handle medications that had fallen onto a medication cart before administering them to a resident, and an LPN did not wear a gown while providing enteral feeding care to another resident under enhanced barrier precautions, despite facility policy requiring these measures.
Two residents did not receive necessary speech therapy services before significant changes were made to their diets, including one who experienced a downgrade to puree texture without a speech consult and another with a history of aspiration pneumonia who was not reassessed for swallowing difficulties despite being placed on NPO status. Facility staff confirmed that required consults and evaluations were not completed as per policy.
The facility failed to maintain room temperatures between 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit, as observed during a complaint investigation. A registered nurse confirmed the building was hot, and several rooms on the A Hall had non-functional AC units, leading to resident complaints. On the B Hall, room temperatures ranged from 71.2 to 79.4 degrees Fahrenheit, with one room reaching 83 degrees. Residents expressed discomfort, and some were moved to other rooms. The Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged the issue and stated that air conditioners were being procured and parts were pending approval for replacement.
A resident reported a year-long issue with a leaking air conditioner in her room, which was not addressed due to a lack of a work order. The unit's filter was wet, and the fan was non-functional, posing a fall risk.
Failure to Employ Qualified Dietary Manager and Maintain Food Handler Certifications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to employ a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) with the appropriate credentials and did not have a full-time Registered Dietitian (RD) on staff. The Food Service Manager (FSM) confirmed during an interview that he was not a CDM, and both the Administrator and Director of Nursing stated that the RD only visited the facility once per week and was otherwise available remotely. The FSM was unable to provide a staffing policy for his position, and attempts to obtain this policy from the contracted food service company, Healthcare Services Group (HCSG), were unsuccessful as no documentation was provided to the surveyor. Additionally, the facility did not ensure that all Nutrition Services Staff possessed the required County/State food handler certifications. Of the ten employees in the department who had been employed for more than 30 days, only three food handler certificates were initially provided, with a total of five eventually located. The remaining certificates could not be produced, and the facility's HR department was unable to account for them. These deficiencies had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals in the facility, which had a census of 96 at the time of the survey.
Food Safety and Kitchen Sanitation Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety, as well as to maintain kitchen equipment in a safe and clean condition. During a kitchen walkthrough, surveyors observed multiple cases of disposable utensils, plates, and cups stored directly on the floor, which the Food Service Manager (FSM) incorrectly stated was acceptable due to their packaging. An opened bag of breadcrumbs in dry storage was not sealed, labeled, or dated correctly, and two sheet pans of turkey stock in the walk-in refrigerator were missing use-by dates and had not been discarded as required. Additional food items, such as an opened bag of parmesan cheese and a pan of gelatin, were not properly labeled or dated, and some items, like sliced bologna and expired flour tortillas, were found without any labeling or with expired dates and were subsequently discarded by the FSM. The facility also failed to maintain kitchen equipment and cleanliness. The mixer was left uncovered when not in use, and there was ice buildup in the walk-in freezer. The two-door reach-in refrigerator contained debris and liquid spills, and the FSM admitted there was no equipment cleaning schedule in place at the time. Two ovens were soiled with debris, and an oven rack was found sitting directly on the floor. A jar of peanut butter was not labeled with an open or use-by date, and the can opener was observed to be soiled. These deficiencies had the potential to affect all residents in the facility, as indicated by the facility census of 96.
Failure to Maintain Hand Hygiene Supplies in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program by not ensuring that paper towels were available at two designated handwashing sinks in the kitchen. During a walkthrough, a surveyor observed that the handwashing sink outside the Food Services Manager's office lacked paper towels, and the Food Services Manager confirmed that the dispenser had not been refilled after the last use, instead providing a cleaning towel for hand drying. Additionally, the handwashing sink in the dish room was also found without paper towels, with the Food Services Manager acknowledging that the dispenser should have been refilled but was not. These lapses in maintaining proper hand hygiene supplies had the potential to affect all residents in the facility, which had a census of 96 at the time of the survey. No specific residents or staff were identified as directly affected in the report, and no medical history or conditions were mentioned.
Failure to Maintain Safe, Clean, and Comfortable Shower Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for its residents, as evidenced by issues with water temperature and cleanliness in the A Wing shower rooms. Two residents with intact cognitive status (BIMS scores of 14 and 15) reported that the shower water was not sufficiently warm, with one resident opting for bed baths due to discomfort. During an observation, the Maintenance Supervisor measured the shower water temperature after running it for seven minutes, finding it only reached 97.4°F, which was acknowledged as not warm enough for a comfortable shower. Additionally, observations of the A Wing shower rooms revealed poor cleanliness and improper storage of personal hygiene items. Multiple wash rags were stacked on sharps containers, numerous bottles of hygiene products were left on the floor, and towels and wash rags were found on chairs and the floor, some appearing dirty. The Administrator confirmed that these items should not be stored in the shower rooms. A review of facility policy indicated that personal hygiene products should be stored in individual resident rooms or designated storage areas to prevent cross-contamination, which was not being followed.
Failure to Maintain Accident-Free Environment and Adequate Supervision
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified in the facility's failure to ensure that an area was free from accident hazards and that adequate supervision was provided to prevent accidents. The report notes that the environment did not meet safety standards, which could contribute to the occurrence of accidents. Specific actions or inactions by staff or details about the residents involved are not provided in the report.
Failure to Develop and Implement Individualized Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement individualized care plans for several residents, specifically in the areas of activities, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). For multiple residents, care plans lacked personalization, with interventions and goals that were generic and did not reflect the residents' specific interests or diagnoses. For example, several residents had care plans that did not specify which activities they enjoyed, despite assessments or staff knowledge indicating clear preferences such as crafts, music, gardening, or social activities. In some cases, activity assessments were missing entirely, and scheduled one-to-one visits were not provided as documented in the care plans. Residents with mental health diagnoses, including depression and PTSD, were not adequately addressed in their care plans. For instance, one resident with documented PTSD and depression had a care plan that only addressed anxiety, omitting the other diagnoses. Another resident's care plan did not mention PTSD at all, despite the diagnosis being present in the medical record. Staff interviews confirmed that these omissions were not due to a lack of awareness but rather a lack of interdisciplinary collaboration and communication during care plan development. The process for creating and updating care plans was found to be insufficiently interdisciplinary. The Activities Director reported not being invited to care plan meetings and not being responsible for writing care plans, while the Social Worker stated that care plans were typically developed by reviewing medical records without input from other departments or the residents themselves. There was also a lack of documentation regarding care plan meeting attendance and resident or representative involvement. Additionally, pain management care plans lacked measurable objectives, timeframes, and individualized details, and there was no evidence of ongoing evaluation or interdisciplinary discussion regarding pain management, even when residents reported pain that interfered with daily function.
Failure to Involve Residents and Interdisciplinary Team in Care Planning
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents and/or their responsible parties, as well as required staff, were included in care plan meetings, and did not revise care plans when new medications were added. For one resident, two psychotropic medications, Tramadol and Lorazepam, were started but not included in the comprehensive care plan. The DON confirmed that these medications were omitted from the care plan, with one medication having been recently initiated. Additionally, the facility's process for care plan development did not involve the full interdisciplinary team as required by policy, and there was no evidence that residents or their representatives were invited to or participated in care plan meetings. Two residents with intact cognition were interviewed and both stated they did not know what a care plan was. Review of documentation revealed no evidence of who attended care plan meetings, and the social worker confirmed that only she and the MDS coordinator were involved in preparing care plans. Letters were mailed to responsible parties, but there was no follow-up to confirm attendance, and in-house residents were not invited or informed about their care plans. These deficiencies affected three residents in a facility with a census of 91.
Food Service Safety Deficiency Due to Use of Wet Plates
Penalty
Summary
During a survey, it was observed that the facility failed to store, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the cook was seen preparing and serving meals on wet plates taken directly from the plate holder. When questioned, the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) confirmed that all the plates being used were wet. Further investigation revealed that the dishwasher was out of dry assist, which resulted in the plates not being properly dried. The CDM acknowledged that serving food on wet plates could draw bacteria. These actions occurred while meals were being prepared and served to residents, with a facility census of 91 at the time.
Incomplete Medical Records and Documentation Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the completeness and accuracy of medical records for multiple residents, particularly in the areas of advance directives, beneficiary notices, and nutrition documentation. For several residents, Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) forms were incomplete, lacking required signatures from authorized representatives or witnesses, and in some cases, there was no documentation of follow-up to obtain these signatures. The Social Worker acknowledged that there was no official process for securing written consent after verbal acknowledgments, and forms were often not mailed to out-of-state representatives, resulting in incomplete documentation. In one instance, a POST form listed the Department of Health and Human Resources as the official surrogate, but there was no documentation of communication regarding the transition of decision-making authority or confirmation of who currently held legal authority. In addition to deficiencies with POST forms, the facility did not properly complete Advance Beneficiary Notices (ABNs) for two residents. Verbal consent was obtained from representatives, but there was no attempt to follow up with mailed, emailed, or faxed notices as required by facility policy. The Social Worker confirmed that only verbal consent was obtained and cited concerns about postage as a reason for not sending the forms. Facility policy required that if a notice could not be hand-delivered, it should be followed up immediately with a mailed, emailed, faxed, or hand-delivered notice, and documentation should comply with form instructions regarding telephone notices. There was also an error in the documentation of a resident's admission weight. The admission weight recorded in the chart was inconsistent with the weight documented by the hospital and the weight assessed by the Registered Dietician. The DON confirmed that the admission weight in the chart was incorrect and should have been corrected. These failures in documentation and record-keeping led to incomplete and inaccurate medical records for the affected residents.
Failure to Maintain Clean and Homelike Resident Bathroom Environment
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when surveyors observed that the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER]-B was not maintained in a clean and comfortable condition. Specifically, the entire base of the toilet was surrounded by a dried orange, yellow, and brown substance, the floor was sticky, and there was a strong urine odor present in the bathroom. These conditions were confirmed by the Housekeeping Supervisor during an interview, who acknowledged that the bathroom was dirty.
Failure to Document Transfer Information Sent to Hospital
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper documentation that required transfer information was provided to the receiving hospital for a resident who was transferred due to a fall, altered mental status, and elevated blood glucose level. Review of the resident's electronic medical records did not show any documentation regarding what information was sent to the hospital at the time of transfer. The only available document was an Acute Care Transfer Document Checklist, which included instructions for sending specific documents with the resident and required checkboxes to indicate which items were sent. However, none of the items on the checklist were checked to confirm that any information was actually sent with the resident. The checklist was signed by both the nurse and the ambulance staff, but there was no indication of which documents accompanied the resident. The Director of Nursing confirmed that this checklist was the only documentation available regarding the transfer, and no further information was provided during the survey process.
Inaccurate MDS Assessment of Psychiatric Diagnoses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately reflect a resident's mental health diagnoses in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Record review showed that the resident had documented diagnoses of anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder (recurrent, severe, without psychotic features), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the electronic health record. However, the most recent MDS assessment only marked PTSD under Section I: Active Diagnoses, omitting both anxiety disorder and depression. This discrepancy was confirmed during an interview with the Director of Nursing, who acknowledged the error.
Failure to Update PASARR with New Mental Health Diagnoses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to update the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) documentation when new mental health diagnoses were identified for two of eight residents reviewed during the annual survey. For one resident, the electronic health record (EHR) listed diagnoses of anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but the most recent PASARR did not reflect any of these conditions. The PASARR form had options to indicate major depression, PTSD, and anxiety, but none were selected. Additionally, the Medical Diagnostic Screening (MDS) assessment for this resident marked PTSD but did not include anxiety disorder or depression, resulting in inconsistencies between the EHR, MDS, and PASARR documentation. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the EHR diagnoses were accurate and that the MDS and PASARR were not coordinated with the EHR. For another resident, a diagnosis of PTSD was present in the resident's diagnosis list but was not included on the PASARR. Both the DON and the Social Worker confirmed that the PTSD diagnosis was missing from the PASARR. These findings were based on record reviews and staff interviews, demonstrating a lack of coordination and updating of PASARR documentation when new mental health diagnoses were identified.
Improper Use and Care of Feeding Tubes
Penalty
Summary
Feeding tubes were used for residents without documented medical necessity or without evidence of resident consent. Additionally, care provided to residents with feeding tubes was not appropriate, as required by regulations. The report identifies failures in ensuring that feeding tubes were only used when medically indicated and agreed to by the resident, and that proper care was given to those with feeding tubes.
Failure to Address Resident's PTSD and Mental Health Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide medically-related social services to assist a resident in attaining or maintaining their mental and psychosocial health. Upon admission, the resident had diagnoses of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Anxiety, and Major Depressive Disorder, which were documented in both the medical record and the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review Assessment. A Social Service Assessment was completed, including a trauma screen, but the resident responded negatively to all trauma-related questions. The assessment did not include input from the resident's representative, nor did it probe for PTSD triggers or address the resident's PTSD diagnosis. The care plan noted a communication problem but did not include goals or interventions for depression or PTSD. There was no referral for psychological evaluation or behavioral services, and the Director of Social Services' notes did not address PTSD. Interviews with the DON and Director of Social Services confirmed that there was no referral for psychological services and that PTSD was not addressed in the care plan or assessments, with the Director of Social Services stating she did not feel further action was necessary due to the negative trauma screen responses.
Failure to Follow Infection Control Practices During Medication Administration and Enhanced Barrier Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper infection prevention and control practices as evidenced by two separate incidents involving medication administration and enhanced barrier precautions. In the first incident, a registered nurse was observed administering medications from blister packs to a resident. When two medications fell onto the uncovered medication cart, the nurse used her bare fingers to place the medications into a cup for administration, contrary to facility policy which prohibits touching medications with bare hands and requires discarding medications that fall onto surfaces. The Director of Nursing confirmed that these actions were not in accordance with facility policy. In the second incident, a licensed practical nurse was observed providing care to a resident with a gastrostomy tube and an order for enhanced barrier precautions due to wounds and the feeding tube. The nurse wore gloves but failed to wear a gown while flushing the gastrostomy tube and connecting enteral feeding, despite facility policy and posted signage requiring both gloves and a gown for such high-contact care activities. The Director of Nursing confirmed that a gown should have been worn during this procedure.
Failure to Provide Required Speech Therapy Services for Residents with Swallowing and Dietary Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide specialized rehabilitative services, specifically speech therapy, for two residents who required such interventions. For one resident, the diet was downgraded from regular texture to puree texture due to ongoing weight loss, but there was no speech therapy consult prior to this significant change. The registered dietician confirmed that such a downgrade should not occur without a speech consult, and the DON acknowledged that staff had not been following the necessary steps for diet changes involving texture modifications. Another resident, who had a history of recurrent aspiration pneumonia and multiple hospitalizations for related complications, was placed on an NPO (nothing by mouth) diet. Despite the resident's reports of not receiving speech therapy for swallowing difficulties and expressing a desire to eat, there was no recent SLP evaluation or swallowing study. The last SLP evaluation was over a year prior, and the resident had not received swallowing therapy or exercises, nor any recent diagnostic tests to reassess swallowing ability. The facility's process for speech therapy referrals relied on telehealth evaluations and outpatient services, but there was no evidence of timely or adequate reassessment for this resident despite significant changes in condition and repeated hospitalizations. Interviews with facility staff revealed gaps in the interdisciplinary team (IDT) process, with daily meetings occurring but no formal IDT meetings to discuss significant changes or therapy needs. The facility's screening policy required therapy services for new admissions and readmissions, but in these cases, the necessary speech therapy consults and evaluations were not completed as required, leading to a failure to provide appropriate specialized rehabilitative services.
Failure to Maintain Adequate Room Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain resident room temperatures within the required range of 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit, as observed during an unannounced complaint investigation. Upon entering the building, a registered nurse confirmed that the building was hot, particularly on the B side, and mentioned that parts had been ordered to address the issue. During a tour of the A Hall, several rooms were found to have inadequate air conditioning, with some units not functioning at all, leading to resident complaints about the heat. Specific issues included non-functional AC units, little air circulation, and leaking units, which had been reported to the Maintenance Director and Nursing Home Administrator. The investigation revealed that room temperatures on the B Hall ranged from 71.2 to 79.4 degrees Fahrenheit, with one room reaching 83 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents expressed discomfort due to the heat, and some were moved to other rooms. The Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged the problem and stated that room air conditioners were being procured and that an AC company had inspected the units, with parts pending approval for replacement. Despite these acknowledgments, the deficiency in maintaining a safe and comfortable environment persisted at the time of the investigation.
Failure to Maintain Functioning Air Conditioner
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a functioning room air conditioner in a resident's room on A Hall, leading to a deficiency. A resident reported that the air conditioning unit had been leaking water onto the floor since her admission approximately a year ago. She expressed concern about the potential risk of falling due to the water on the floor. Upon observation, the air conditioning unit's filter was found partially pulled out and wet, and the unit's fan was not operational. The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was informed of the leak, and the Maintenance Director confirmed that there was no work order for the issue. The Maintenance Director identified that the drain tube was plugged, which was subsequently addressed.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 31 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Elkins
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autumn Lake Healthcare At Crystal Springs | 0.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Elkins Rehabilitation & Care Center | 4.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 0 |
| Tygart Valley Health & Rehabilitation | 6.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 12 | 0 |
| Mansfield Place | 16.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Holbrook Healthcare Center | 18 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Nella's At Autumn Lake Healthcare.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.