Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
E

Failure to Involve Residents and Interdisciplinary Team in Care Planning

Elkins, West Virginia Survey Completed on 08-05-2025

Penalty

Fine: $34,575
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents and/or their responsible parties, as well as required staff, were included in care plan meetings, and did not revise care plans when new medications were added. For one resident, two psychotropic medications, Tramadol and Lorazepam, were started but not included in the comprehensive care plan. The DON confirmed that these medications were omitted from the care plan, with one medication having been recently initiated. Additionally, the facility's process for care plan development did not involve the full interdisciplinary team as required by policy, and there was no evidence that residents or their representatives were invited to or participated in care plan meetings. Two residents with intact cognition were interviewed and both stated they did not know what a care plan was. Review of documentation revealed no evidence of who attended care plan meetings, and the social worker confirmed that only she and the MDS coordinator were involved in preparing care plans. Letters were mailed to responsible parties, but there was no follow-up to confirm attendance, and in-house residents were not invited or informed about their care plans. These deficiencies affected three residents in a facility with a census of 91.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙