Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Park View Home during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Surveyors found multiple food safety failures in the LTC kitchen, including staff mixing hot food with cooled leftovers, failing to document food temps, and storing many items without open or use-by dates. Staff also entered the kitchen without proper hair/beard restraints and handled clean dishes while wearing contaminated clothing after washing dirty dishes.
Medication Error Rate Exceeded 5 Percent Due to Improper Insulin Administration. An LPN administered insulin to a resident with type 2 DM in the deltoid muscle instead of the ordered sub-Q tissue. The resident’s orders called for Insulin Glargine daily and Novolog per sliding scale sub-Q, but the surveyor observed both doses given in the deltoid. The DON stated insulin should be given in fattier subcutaneous areas and that this was not the facility’s typical practice.
The facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation after a resident with cognitive impairment was kissed without consent by another resident. Despite the facility's policy requiring interviews with other residents to rule out further abuse, no such interviews were conducted. The DON and NHA did not believe additional investigation was necessary, relying on their knowledge of the resident's behavior. This resulted in an incomplete investigation and a deficiency in the facility's abuse prevention efforts.
A Dietary Aide in an LTC facility was observed handling ready-to-eat foods with bare hands and failing to perform adequate hand hygiene during breakfast service, affecting five residents. The aide did not use tongs or gloves as required by facility policy and the FDA Food Code, and did not wash hands after handling dirty dishes before returning to food preparation tasks. The Dietary Manager confirmed the aide's actions were against established guidelines.
The facility failed to adhere to infection control protocols, as staff did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes during wound care and after glove removal following a resident's bath. A resident with chronic Moisture Associated Skin Damage received wound care from an RN who did not sanitize hands between glove changes. Additionally, a CNA applied lotion to a resident's skin without performing hand hygiene after removing gloves post-bath.
Food Storage, Temperature Monitoring, and Cross-Contamination Failures
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, and served using proper food handling practices. During observation, policy review, and staff interviews, surveyors found that staff mixed hot food with cooled leftovers in the same containers instead of keeping them separate. On 9/23/25, a cook placed food returned from kitchenette steam tables into containers that already held cooled food, including rice, vegetables, and meat with gravy. The surveyor observed temperatures of 139 F and 124 F for rice, and 161 F and 124 F for meat and gravy, and the cook combined the foods and returned them to the cooler with lids ajar. The temperatures taken during this process were not recorded or logged. Surveyors also observed multiple food items in the kitchen cooler and dry storage that were not labeled with open dates, use-by dates, or other identifying information. Items included chicken patties, sauces, frozen and refrigerated meats, oatmeal, crackers, cereal stored in unlabeled bags, and bulk dessert mixes removed from original packaging and placed into bins without a facility-created label showing date of receipt or use-by date. Staff stated that some items were used quickly or identified by lot number, but the surveyor observed that several items had no visible date or label and could not be matched to a use date. Additional observations showed staff not following food safety practices during kitchen operations. A maintenance supervisor entered the kitchen with a hair net worn incorrectly and no beard net despite having a full beard. Staff also did not consistently take and document food temperatures before serving meals from the kitchenettes, and temperature logs were not maintained for food served from those areas. In another observation, dietary staff handled dirty dishes while wearing contaminated clothing and then touched clean dishes without changing clothing or using a barrier between dirty and clean tasks.
Medication Error Rate Exceeded 5 Percent Due to Improper Insulin Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure its medication error rate remained below 5 percent; the reported medication error rate was 5.88 percent. During observation, LPN C administered insulin to R17 in the deltoid muscle instead of the subcutaneous tissue ordered by the physician. R17 was admitted with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, and the physician’s orders specified Insulin Glargine 14 units sub-Q daily and Novolog (Aspart) 100 unit/ml variable doses per sliding scale sub-Q three times a day. On 09/23/25 at 7:19 AM, the surveyor observed LPN C administer Lantus 14 units into the left deltoid muscle and Aspart 2 units into the right deltoid muscle. Later, the DON stated insulin should be given in fattier subcutaneous areas and that it was not the facility’s typical practice to administer insulin in the deltoid region.
Failure to Conduct Thorough Abuse Investigation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation following an incident of alleged abuse involving two residents. Resident R2, who has Alzheimer's and cognitive impairment, was kissed on the mouth by R1 without proper consent. The facility's policy requires a comprehensive investigation, including interviews with other residents who may have been affected. However, the facility did not interview other residents to rule out further incidents of abuse, nor did they document any efforts to ensure that other residents had no contact with R1. Interviews with the Director of Nursing and the Nursing Home Administrator revealed that they did not believe it was necessary to interview other residents, as they felt confident in their knowledge of R1's behavior and history. Despite R1's previous interactions with another resident, the facility did not take additional steps to investigate potential abuse involving other residents. The lack of interviews and documentation indicates a failure to adhere to the facility's abuse prevention policy, resulting in an incomplete investigation.
Improper Food Handling and Hygiene Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food service safety, as observed by surveyors. Dietary Aide (DA) C was seen handling ready-to-eat foods with bare hands, which is against the facility's policy and the FDA Food Code. DA C picked up biscuits and toast with bare hands, cut them, and served them to residents without using tongs or gloves. This improper handling of food was observed during breakfast service in the 100-hall dining room, affecting five residents. Additionally, DA C did not perform adequate hand hygiene during the breakfast service and cleanup. After handling dirty dishes, DA C failed to wash hands before returning to food preparation tasks. Instead, DA C wiped hands on the uniform and continued to handle food and clean dishes. This lack of proper handwashing was noted multiple times during the observation period, including after handling dirty dishes and before serving food to residents. The Dietary Manager (DM) E confirmed that DA C was not following the facility's policy or the FDA Food Code for safe food handling. DM E acknowledged that DA C had been educated on hand hygiene and the prohibition of bare hand contact with ready-to-eat foods but did not adhere to these guidelines during the observed breakfast service. The deficiency was noted in the handling of food and the transition between dirty and clean tasks without proper handwashing.
Infection Control Deficiencies in Hand Hygiene Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by improper hand hygiene practices during wound care and bathing observations. During a wound care procedure for a resident with chronic Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD), a registered nurse (RN) did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes. The RN removed old dressings, cleaned the area, and applied new dressings without using hand sanitizer or washing hands between glove changes, contrary to the facility's Hand Hygiene Policy and Procedure. This lapse in protocol was confirmed by the Director of Nursing (DON), who acknowledged that the RN did not follow the facility's policy. In another instance, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) failed to perform hand hygiene after removing gloves following a resident's bath. The CNA then applied lotion to the resident's skin with bare hands, reasoning that both the resident and her hands were clean post-bath. This action was inconsistent with proper infection control practices, as hand hygiene should be performed after glove removal, regardless of perceived cleanliness. These observations highlight deficiencies in adherence to infection control protocols by the facility staff.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 81 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Woodville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baldwin Care Center | 3.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
| Hammond Health Services | 7.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Spring Valley Health And Rehab Center | 8.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 0 |
| Glenhaven | 9.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 18 | 0 |
| Kinnic Health And Rehabilitation Center | 16.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Park View Home.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.