Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Hayward Health Services during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A facility lacked a system to keep snack and nourishment refrigerators maintained per posted food storage guidelines. A surveyor observed a container of sliced vegetables in a resident refrigerator that was labeled with a resident's name but had an outdated used-by date, and the Kitchen District Manager stated it should have been discarded per the refrigerator instructions.
Surveyors found multiple infection control failures, including a COVID-positive resident without TBP signage, staff donning and doffing PPE incorrectly in COVID rooms, an RN failing to sanitize hands and handling nebulizer equipment without a barrier, and clean laundry carts left uncovered while a staff member worked in the area with an open beverage. The DON acknowledged the missing precaution sign and inconsistent PPE practices, and the laundry manager stated clean carts should be covered and beverages should not be in the clean laundry area.
An RN failed to treat two residents with dignity and respect during care. One resident with intact cognition was given nebulizer-related care and lung assessment without the RN announcing herself or explaining the procedure, and the resident later said they did not know the assessment occurred. Another resident with severe cognitive impairment received insulin in the dining room without explanation, privacy, or permission, despite the DON stating residents should be taken out of the dining room unless they agree to receive the injection there.
A resident with intact cognition and multiple medical diagnoses was denied the right to keep a personal refrigerator in the room. The resident reported that a boyfriend brought in the fridge, but staff said state rules did not allow it and required it to be removed. Maintenance and kitchen staff said residents could use a shared fridge in the dining room, and the NHA acknowledged the denial was based on concerns about temperature checks and item assessments.
A resident with intact cognition and multiple medical diagnoses was not consistently allowed to smoke outside when she requested. Her care plan stated staff would go out with her when she asked for a cigarette, but she reported being told staff were busy or short staffed and sometimes not getting out at all for over a week. The surveyor observed her ask to go outside, and an RN said staff would take her when they had time; the DON said no smoking schedule was set up, and the Regional Director confirmed no other means were offered to curb her cravings.
A resident with CKD, HF, unsteadiness, and weakness had a care plan and CNA Kardex directing daily assisted ambulation with a walker and gait belt to and from meals. Surveyors found staff did not consistently offer or provide the walking program, with CNAs stating there was not enough time on day shift and that refusals were sometimes charted even when ambulation was not offered. The resident reported wanting to walk to meals daily, but was observed using a wheelchair to and from the dining room without staff offering ambulation.
Failure to provide ordered pressure injury care and repositioning occurred for a resident with DM2, CKD, and a coccyx stage II ulcer. The resident was dependent on staff for repositioning, had a high Braden risk score, and was observed sitting in the same recliner position for hours without being offloaded. Surveyors observed fecal incontinence, extensive sacral excoriation, and no Mepilex dressing in place despite wound clinic orders for Triad paste, sacral Mepilex, and nystatin powder. CNA staff stated they had not repositioned the resident since the morning shower, and the DON acknowledged the plan of care was not followed.
A resident with COPD and other serious diagnoses did not receive respiratory care consistent with orders and the care plan. An RN administered a nebulizer without a documented pre-assessment, left the resident unattended during treatment, and later performed an incomplete lung assessment. Staff also removed the resident’s O2 during transfers despite an order for continuous O2 at 2 L, and the resident’s O2 saturation dropped to 86. The RN and DON could not identify baseline O2 parameters, and the EHR had no physician order for saturation limits.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple chronic conditions remained on Trazodone for insomnia even after pharmacy recommended discontinuation or dose reduction if sleep was adequate. The care plan called for sleep monitoring and psychotropic reduction, but survey review found no consistent 2-hour sleep behavior documentation, no recent sleep concerns, and only one sleep assessment earlier in the year; the DON and Regional Director acknowledged the sleep assessment was not readdressed as suggested by pharmacy.
Medication error rate exceeded the 5% threshold after surveyors observed 3 errors in 31 opportunities. An RN gave Atropine drops to one resident from a bottle with no open date label, and another RN administered Lantus insulin to a resident without checking the physician order or insulin pen open date; the MAR/EHR also showed the RN signed out Semiglee instead of the Lantus actually given.
A resident received 16 units of insulin glargine (Lantus) from an RN without verification of a current physician order or the insulin pen open date. The RN later documented Semiglee insulin in the EHR/MAR even though Lantus was the medication actually administered, and both the RN and DON identified the MAR entry as a transcribing issue involving the wrong insulin order.
Unlabeled and potentially expired medications were administered to two residents. An RN gave insulin glargine from a Lantus pen to one resident without an open date or expiration label, and another RN administered Atropine drops to a second resident from a bottle with no open date label, leaving the expiration unknown. The DON stated that opened meds, including insulin pens, must be labeled with open dates and expiration information, and both RNs acknowledged they should have checked the labels before administration.
A facility failed to verify gastrostomy tube placement before medication administration and did not adhere to infection control measures for enteral feeding. An LPN administered medication without checking Gastric Residual Volume, and a container of enteral formula was not changed within the required 24-hour period, as confirmed by the DON.
A facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%, with errors affecting two residents. An LPN administered a heparin injection incorrectly and failed to give sliding scale insulin due to an EHR transcription error. The DON confirmed the errors and noted the EHR issue has been corrected.
A long-term care facility was found deficient in infection control practices. Staff failed to perform proper hand hygiene and wear appropriate PPE during resident care. An RN did not sanitize hands when changing gloves during wound care, a CNA did not sanitize hands between resident rooms, and an LPN did not don PPE or perform hand hygiene while caring for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions.
Outdated Food Stored in Resident Refrigerator
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not have a system in place to ensure snack and nourishment refrigerators on the unit were maintained in accordance with professional standards to prevent the potential for foodborne illness. Facility guidelines posted on the resident refrigerator stated that any food placed in the refrigerator must be clearly marked with the resident name and dated with a new used-by date. During observation on 12/17/2025 at 9:35 AM, a surveyor found a plastic container of sliced vegetables labeled with R33's name and dated 12/09/25 stored in the resident refrigerator located in the dining room. During interview on 12/17/2025 at 9:43 AM, the Kitchen District Manager stated the items should have been discarded per the guidelines on the refrigerator door.
Infection Control Failures With COVID Precautions, PPE Use, Hand Hygiene, Nebulizer Care, and Laundry Handling
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections. The report states this had the potential to affect all 33 residents in the facility. Surveyors observed multiple infection control failures involving COVID-19 transmission-based precautions, PPE use, hand hygiene, nebulizer care, and laundry handling. A resident who tested positive for COVID-19 and was on transmission-based precautions did not have signage outside the room identifying the precautions in place. The resident had been admitted with hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage. The DON acknowledged awareness that the required droplet precaution sign was not placed on the resident’s door until after surveyors arrived. Surveyors also observed staff entering and exiting COVID-positive rooms without following the expected PPE sequence, including staff removing PPE improperly, placing contaminated goggles and masks on top of the PPE cart, and exiting rooms without the N95 mask in place. The DON stated all PPE should be doffed before exiting the room, while staff interviews showed uncertainty and inconsistent practice. Surveyors also observed an RN enter a resident’s room without sanitizing hands, remove a nebulizer mask, place it in a contaminated sink without a barrier, rinse it, and leave the room without sanitizing hands. In the laundry area, clean linens were observed on open carts without covers, and a staff member handled clean laundry while wearing a gown taken from a table with an open beverage container nearby. The Accounts Manager/Head of Laundry stated clean laundry carts should be covered and staff should not have personal or open beverages in the clean laundry work area.
Failure to Provide Dignified, Respectful Care During Nebulizer and Insulin Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure that every resident was treated with dignity and respect during ADL-related care for 2 of 12 residents reviewed. For one resident with diagnoses including chronic pulmonary disease, pleural effusion, dysphagia, weakness, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, morbid obesity, schizoaffective disorder, hypertensive heart disease, CHF, major depressive disorder, PTSD, and a left artificial knee joint, the resident had a BIMS score of 15/15 and required substantial maximal assistance with transfers. During observation of a nebulizer treatment, an RN entered the resident’s room, later removed the nebulizer mask, and then returned with a stethoscope to listen to lung sounds without announcing herself or explaining the procedure to the resident. The resident later stated they did not hear anyone come in and did not know the lung assessment occurred. The RN stated the resident was a heavy sleeper, while the DON stated procedures are to be explained to residents before being performed and that the RN should have announced herself and explained what was happening. For another resident with diagnoses including Parkinsonism, dysphagia, gait and mobility abnormalities, unsteady gait, dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, and hypertensive chronic kidney disease, the resident had a BIMS score of 04/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. During observation, an RN approached the resident in the dining room with an insulin pen, did not announce what she was doing, lifted the resident’s shirt, and administered insulin in front of others without explaining the procedure or asking permission to provide the injection in the dining room. The RN stated she usually pulls everyone else out of the dining room for privacy if requested, but did not explain the insulin administration or ask permission because she believed the resident would not understand. The DON stated nurses should take residents out of the dining room for privacy unless the resident agrees to receive insulin there, and that the RN should have taken the resident out of the dining room.
Resident Denied Personal Refrigerator in Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure that one resident, R7, had the right to retain personal possessions, including furnishings, as space permits, unless doing so would infringe on the rights or health and safety of other residents. R7 was admitted with diagnoses including chronic pulmonary disease, pleural effusion, dysphagia, weakness, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, a non-pressure ulcer of the right calf, morbid obesity, schizoaffective disorder, hypertensive heart disease, CHF, major depressive disorder, PTSD, and a left artificial knee joint. The resident’s MDS assessment showed a BIMS score of 15/15, indicating intact cognition, and that R7 required substantial maximal assistance with transfers. During interview, R7 stated that staff were great but the main concern was not being allowed to have a personal refrigerator in the room. R7 reported that a boyfriend brought a fridge into the room, but staff said state rules did not allow personal fridges in resident rooms and made the boyfriend take it back. R7 said the concern had been reported to a nurse and that a prior administrator had also refused the request, stating the resident could not keep the fridge in the room because the facility could not keep temperature checks and item assessments on a regular basis. Maintenance and kitchen staff reported there was a resident fridge in the dining room for residents to store food, and the NHA acknowledged awareness of the denial and stated the prior interim NHA had given the same explanation.
Resident Smoking Choice Not Supported
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure that a resident with intact cognition had the right to make choices about smoking outside when requested. The resident, admitted with diagnoses including chronic pulmonary disease, pleural effusion, dysphagia, weakness, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, a non-pressure ulcer of the right calf, morbid obesity, schizoaffective disorder, hypertensive heart disease, CHF, major depressive disorder, PTSD, and a left artificial knee joint, had a BIMS score of 15/15 and required substantial maximal assistance with transfers. The resident’s smoking care plan stated that staff would go out with the resident when she requested a cigarette, and the nicotine assessment noted she wanted to smoke at least once a day and was supervised with staff when smoking, with time determined by staff. During interview, the resident reported that staff often told her they were busy or short staffed and could not take her outside when she asked to smoke, and that sometimes she did not get to go out at all and had not been out in over a week. The surveyor observed the resident ask several staff at the nurse’s station to go outside to smoke, and an RN told her staff were short at that moment and that they would take her out when they had time. The DON stated staff did not set up a smoking schedule for the resident and instead tried to take her whenever they could, while the MRC reported no residents had been out to smoke for about a week and a half due to weather and was unsure whether the resident had been taken out when she requested. The Regional Director later confirmed the resident was not offered any other means to curb her craving for cigarettes while she was not taken outside.
Failure to Provide Ordered Ambulation Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure that R2 received treatment and care to address mobility needs in accordance with professional standards of practice. R2 was admitted with diagnoses including hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and stage 5 chronic kidney disease, unsteadiness on feet, and weakness. The MDS indicated R2 had moderate cognition, used a walker, and required supervision and touch assistance with ambulation. R2’s care plan and CNA Kardex directed staff to assist R2 with walking using a gait belt and walker, including walking to and from meals as tolerated each day. Survey findings showed the walking program was not consistently carried out. The CNA task checklist documented multiple entries of resident refusal, supervised ambulation, independent ambulation, moderate help, and not attempted due to safety concerns, while R2 told the surveyor staff did not offer to walk him to and from the dining room every day and that he wanted to walk for meals daily. During observations, R2 remained in bed when breakfast trays were passed, and over the survey period he was observed self-propelling or being pushed in a wheelchair to and from the dining room for three meals without staff offering or encouraging ambulation. CNAs stated residents did not always get offered ambulation because there was not enough time on day shift, and they acknowledged charting could be marked as refused even when residents were not offered to ambulate. The DON stated that if R2’s care plan indicated ambulation to and from the dining room, R2 should be encouraged and offered that assistance.
Failure to Provide Ordered Pressure Injury Care and Repositioning
Penalty
Summary
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing was not ensured for a resident with a pressure injury. The resident had diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease, was cognitively intact with a BIMS of 15/15, and was dependent on staff for repositioning and transfers. Facility assessments showed the resident’s Braden score changed from 14, indicating moderate risk, to 10, indicating high risk. The care plan included turning and repositioning at least every 2 hours and administering treatments as ordered, but the resident’s pressure injury care was not consistently carried out. The resident’s coccyx pressure injury was tracked by the facility as a stage II ulcer with denuded, reddened, and excoriated skin. The wound clinic later ordered Triad paste, sacral Mepilex, and nystatin powder for the groin and peri area because incontinence was suspected to be causing skin irritation and infection. The facility documented that the resident returned from the wound clinic with new orders, but the Mepilex order was not transcribed into the system until several days later because staff were awaiting clarification of the wound clinic order. During survey observation, the resident remained in the same recliner position for over 4 hours after being placed there following a shower. The resident stated staff had not assisted her out of the recliner and said her bottom was sore and that she had soiled herself. When staff later transferred her to bed, surveyors observed feces leaking through her clothing and brief, a brown stain on the recliner cushion cover, and extensive excoriation of the sacral area from above the coccyx to below the upper thigh areas. No Mepilex dressing was in place at that time, and CNA staff stated they had not repositioned the resident since the morning shower. The DON stated staff were expected to follow the plan of care and acknowledged the Mepilex order had not been transcribed, though it would have been expected to be placed.
Respiratory Care and Oxygen Not Provided Consistently With Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident with COPD, pleural effusion, dysphagia, weakness, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, morbid obesity, CHF, and other diagnoses who required oxygen and nebulizer treatments. The resident’s physician orders included scheduled ipratropium-albuterol nebulizer treatments, oxygen by nasal cannula at 2 L every shift for COPD, and PRN nebulizer treatments for shortness of breath. The resident’s care plan also directed staff to keep the oxygen tank full before leaving the room and to provide continuous oxygen at 2 LPM, evaluate lung sounds and vital signs as needed, and report abnormalities to the MD. During observation, an RN administered a nebulizer treatment and then left the resident alone while the treatment continued. The surveyor later observed the nebulizer still running with the resident unattended, and the DON noticed the completed treatment and directed the RN to stop it. When the RN returned, the surveyor observed the RN remove the nebulizer mask without sanitizing hands. The RN later acknowledged that a pre-assessment of lung sounds should have been completed before the treatment and that a post-assessment should have been done afterward. When the RN returned to assess lung sounds, the surveyor did not observe the RN announce herself, explain the procedure, ask the resident to sit forward, or assess all four lung areas. The resident later stated that he or she did not hear anyone come in to listen to the lungs and did not know that occurred. The facility also did not maintain the resident’s oxygen as ordered during care and transfers. A CNA removed the resident’s oxygen during transfer to a bedside commode, and the resident’s oxygen saturation was later observed at 86. The RN stated the resident should have had oxygen on continuously and noted the concentrator was set between 2 and 3 L instead of the ordered 2 L, then adjusted it to 2 L. The CNA reported removing the oxygen during transfer and finding the portable tank empty. The RN later checked the resident’s post-treatment oxygen saturation at 90 on 2 L. When asked about baseline oxygen saturation parameters, the RN could not identify them, and review of the EHR showed no physician order for oxygen saturation parameters to guide staff.
Unnecessary Trazodone Use Not Reassessed
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure that one resident’s drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs when Trazodone was continued for insomnia despite pharmacy recommendations to discontinue or attempt reduction if the resident was sleeping well. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including Parkinsonism, dysphagia, gait and mobility abnormalities, unsteady gait, dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, and hypertensive chronic kidney disease stage 1-4. The resident’s MDS assessment showed a BIMS score of 04/15, indicating severe impaired cognition, and no behaviors were noted on that assessment. The physician order included Trazodone 25 mg at bedtime for insomnia related to depression, along with monitoring for antidepressant side effects. The resident’s pharmacy monthly reviews documented a recommendation to discontinue Trazodone if the resident was sleeping well to minimize the total number of medications, and later recommended attempting reduction of Trazodone 25 mg at bedtime. The resident’s care plan included sleep cycle issues and use of Trazodone, with directions to monitor sleep patterns and attempt psychotropic drug reduction per MD orders. Survey review found no consistent nightly documentation of sleep behaviors every two hours, no sleep concerns documented for the last 30 days, and only one sleep assessment completed earlier in the year stating the resident slept well since admission with no restlessness noted. The DON and Regional Director acknowledged that staff were not consistently assessing sleep behaviors every two hours and that the sleep assessment had not been readdressed as suggested by pharmacy.
Medication Error Rate Exceeded Due to Unlabeled Atropine and Incorrect Insulin Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure its medication error rate remained at 5% or less. During observation of medication passes, surveyors identified 3 medication errors out of 31 opportunities, resulting in a 9.68% error rate for 2 of 6 residents observed, including R25 and R15. For R25, RN L administered Atropine drops sublingually even though the bottle had no open date label, and the expiration or potency of the medication was unknown. RN L later stated the bottle should have been discarded and a new one obtained because the open date was not known, and the DON stated that nurses are expected to check open date labels and that administering an expired medication is considered a medication error. For R15, RN E administered 16 units of insulin glargine 100 UNT/ML pen injector (Lantus) without checking the physician order and without verifying the insulin pen open date, so expiration was unknown. RN E later stated the pen should have been checked because insulin pens must be discarded after 28 days, and acknowledged not looking before administration. Surveyor review of the MAR and EHR showed RN E documented giving Semiglee insulin 16 units even though the medication actually administered was Lantus 16 units. RN E stated the correct process would have been to discontinue the Semiglee order and enter the Lantus order in the MAR, and the DON stated the Semiglee order should have been discontinued and the correct medication entered in the MAR.
Medication Administration and Documentation Error
Penalty
Summary
A significant medication error occurred for R15 when RN E administered 16 units of insulin glargine 100 UNT/ML Pen Injector [Lantus] without checking for a physician order for Lantus and without verifying the open date on the insulin pen. The report states that insulin pens should be discarded 28 days after opening, but RN E did not check the pen before administration, so the expiration status was unknown at the time the insulin was given. During later review, RN E documented in R15’s EHR that Semiglee insulin 16 units had been given, even though the medication actually administered was Lantus 16 units. RN E stated that R15’s physician had previously ordered Lantus in place of Semiglee until pharmacy could send Semiglee to the facility, and that the correct process would have been to discontinue the Semiglee order and enter the Lantus order in the MAR so staff could sign out the correct medication. DON B also stated that the Semiglee order should have been discontinued and the correct medication entered in the MAR.
Unlabeled and Potentially Expired Medications Administered
Penalty
Summary
Drugs and biologicals were not labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and expired medications were not removed from residents’ medication supplies. During observation, one insulin Lantus pen for R15 did not have an open date or expiration label when RN E administered 16 units of insulin glargine. The surveyor observed the administration and noted that the pen had no open date label. RN E stated that insulin pens must be discarded after 28 days and acknowledged not checking for an open date before giving the insulin. The DON stated that all opened medications must be labeled with the open date and that insulin pens need both an open date and expiration date. In a separate observation, RN L administered Atropine drops sublingually to R25, and the bottle had no open date label, so the expiration was unknown. RN L stated that the bottle should have been discarded and a new one obtained because the potency and expiration status were not known. The DON stated that nurses are expected to check open date labels to prevent expired medications from being administered.
Deficiencies in G-Tube Medication Administration and Infection Control
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to proper standards of practice for verifying gastrostomy tube placement before administering medications to a resident. During an observation, an LPN was seen preparing and administering medications via a resident's G-tube without checking the Gastric Residual Volume (GRV) as required by the facility's policy. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the expectation is for staff to assess GRV by pulling back a syringe to check for gastric contents before flushing or administering medications. This procedure was not followed, indicating a lapse in the facility's adherence to its own protocols. Additionally, the facility did not maintain proper infection control measures concerning the enteral formula used for tube feeding. A container of Promote with Fiber formula was observed on the resident's bedside table with a label dated several days prior, indicating it had not been changed within the 24-hour period as required. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the formula should be discarded within 24 hours once opened, but this protocol was not followed, leading to a deficiency in infection control practices.
Medication Administration Errors in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of 5% or less, as observed during a medication administration task where 2 errors occurred out of 35 opportunities, resulting in a 5.71% error rate. This affected two residents. One error involved a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) administering a heparin injection to a resident via the incorrect route. The LPN used a 1-inch needle and inserted it fully at a 90-degree angle into the resident's abdomen, contrary to the physician's order for a subcutaneous injection at a 45-degree angle. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the facility only had 1-inch needles available and acknowledged that the injection was not administered subcutaneously as required. Another error involved the same LPN failing to administer sliding scale insulin to a different resident whose blood sugar level indicated the need for 2 units of insulin. The LPN was unaware of the sliding scale order, as it was not properly linked in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) system. The DON indicated that the sliding scale order was not entered correctly in the EHR, which led to the oversight. The order has since been corrected in the system.
Infection Control Deficiencies in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by multiple instances of staff not performing proper hand hygiene and not wearing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). During a wound care procedure for a resident on contact precautions, a registered nurse (RN) did not perform hand hygiene when changing gloves multiple times throughout the procedure. The RN admitted to forgetting to wash hands or use hand sanitizer, which was confirmed as a deviation from the facility's infection control policy by the Director of Nursing (DON). In another instance, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) was observed not sanitizing hands when entering and exiting resident rooms and only washing the tips of fingers on one hand due to a wrist brace. The CNA acknowledged the difficulty in performing hand hygiene with the brace and admitted to not sanitizing hands between resident rooms. The DON confirmed that the CNA should have been wearing gloves over the wrist brace and performing thorough hand hygiene. Additionally, a licensed practical nurse (LPN) failed to don PPE and perform hand hygiene while providing care to a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for tube feeding. The LPN did not wear PPE or sanitize hands during medication administration and G-tube care, despite acknowledging the requirement to do so. The DON confirmed that the LPN should have followed proper hand hygiene and PPE protocols during these procedures.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Hayward
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water's Edge | 12.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Dove Healthcare - Spooner | 24 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Shell Lake Health Care Center | 34.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 0 |
| Heritage Lakeside | 37.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 15 | 1 |
| Dove Healthcare - Rice Lake | 37.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 15 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Hayward Health Services.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.