Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Shell Lake Health Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Two residents with cognitive impairment were involved in an incident where a CNA failed to immediately report suspected physical abuse by another CNA, resulting in a delay in removing the alleged perpetrator from duty. The facility also did not submit the required five-day follow-up investigation report to the State Agency on time, contrary to policy requirements.
Food safety practices were not followed in the kitchen and during beverage service. An EVS staff member entered the kitchen without a hair net, even though staff stated hair nets are required for anyone entering the area. Surveyors also observed cups of milk and juice staged for resident trays, and a Dietary Aide said she checked the cold beverage temperatures but did not document them. Review of logs showed missing temperature documentation for multiple meals, and the Dietary Manager and NHA acknowledged that cold beverages should be checked and recorded.
Incomplete Nutrition Assessments Led to Inaccurate MDS: A resident with DM, CKD, Alzheimer's, dementia, and hypothyroidism had quarterly nutrition assessments missing, which affected the accuracy of the MDS. The resident was severely cognitively impaired, needed supervision for eating and mobility, and had a care plan for altered nutrition status, but dietary documentation was inconsistent and the CDM acknowledged a missed assessment while the MDS Coordinator confirmed nutrition assessments are part of the quarterly MDS.
A facility failed to keep the resident environment free of accident hazards and provide adequate supervision after falls involving two residents. One resident with dementia, epilepsy, and severe cognitive impairment had multiple falls, but the record did not show immediate fall-prevention interventions, root-cause review, or updated care plan interventions. Another resident with Alzheimer’s disease and severe cognitive impairment fell from a spouse’s bed, and a new direction to sleep in the resident’s own bed was documented separately but was not added to the care plan or CNA kardex.
A resident with chronic pain, moderate cognitive impairment, and multiple pain medication orders had pain assessments that documented only a severity score and did not include quality, duration, location, or onset. The care plan did not identify the resident’s desired or tolerable pain level, non-pharmacological interventions were not documented, and the resident told the surveyor the facility was not really addressing the pain concerns. An LPN and the DON stated pain assessments should include more detailed characteristics, but those details were not consistently documented.
Failure to Prime Insulin Pen Before Administration: An LPN administered a resident’s Lantus insulin without priming the insulin pen first, despite facility procedure requiring a prime before the dose is set and injected. The resident had type 2 DM and an order for 50 units of insulin in the morning. The LPN stated she had never been instructed to prime insulin pens, and the DON stated the expectation was to prime with 2 units before giving the prescribed dose.
A resident was prescribed Celexa for adjustment disorder with depressed mood based on caregiver input that the resident seemed depressed, was flat, and rarely smiled. Survey review found no documented depression-related behaviors in the behavior monitoring, no provider assessment before the antidepressant was ordered, and no assessment for alternative causes such as pain; the DON stated staff relied on family/caregiver reports and had not assessed the resident for depressive mood or behaviors first.
The facility did not maintain an effective infection prevention and control program. During cares for a resident with dementia and multiple medical conditions, a CNA used contaminated gloves across tasks, changed bedding while still wearing those gloves, and did not perform hand hygiene before donning new gloves. In another resident's room, an EM sneezed without covering the nose or mouth, continued working, and left without wiping surfaces or cleaning hands. The DON stated staff are expected to wash hands before and after room entry, after touching surfaces, during cares, and when removing gloves.
A resident with serious health conditions did not receive appropriate respiratory care as per physician orders. The oxygen was set at 2 liters per minute instead of the ordered 3 liters, and there was no record of when the nasal cannula tubing was changed or the oxygen concentrator filter was cleaned. The LPN was unaware of the correct oxygen flow rate, and the DON confirmed the incorrect setting and uncleaned filter.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple medical conditions received care that did not adhere to infection control protocols. CNAs failed to sanitize hands after glove removal and improperly disposed of soiled water, indicating a lack of awareness of proper sanitation practices. The DON confirmed the expected procedures, highlighting a deficiency in staff training and adherence to infection control standards.
A resident with cognitive impairment and mobility issues was improperly transferred by a CNA alone, resulting in a fall and a swollen hip. The incident was not reported to the administration, and there was no documentation of the fall, contrary to facility policy requiring immediate reporting and assessment by the charge nurse.
Two residents in an LTC facility did not receive timely assistance with toileting and personal hygiene, leading to prolonged periods in soiled briefs. One resident, with multiple medical conditions, was not assisted for over four hours, while another resident's call light was ignored for 79 minutes. Staffing issues and inadequate adherence to care plans and facility policies contributed to these deficiencies.
Three residents at high risk for pressure injuries did not receive necessary care to prevent or manage pressure ulcers. One resident was not repositioned for over four hours, resulting in redness and wrinkling of the skin. Another resident with a scapula pressure ulcer was left in a position that increased pressure on the affected area. A third resident did not have required Podus boots applied, leading to the reopening of a heel wound.
Two residents at risk for falls did not receive adequate supervision and assistance devices, leading to deficiencies in their care. One resident, with significant cognitive impairment, was improperly transferred by a single CNA, resulting in a fall. Another resident, requiring a knee immobilizer for stability, was transferred without it by a CNA. These incidents highlight a lack of adherence to care plans and proper reporting procedures.
The facility was found to have insufficient nursing staff, resulting in delayed care for residents. One resident with multiple medical conditions waited 79 minutes for assistance, while another with a pressure injury was not repositioned for over four hours. A third resident with dementia also experienced delays in receiving help. These incidents highlight the facility's failure to provide adequate staffing to meet resident needs.
Failure to Timely Report and Investigate Alleged Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that allegations of physical abuse involving two residents were reported immediately and that the required five-day follow-up investigation report was submitted to the State Agency in a timely manner. One resident, who had dementia and severely impaired cognition, and another resident, who had a history of subarachnoid hemorrhage and moderately impaired cognition, were both identified as vulnerable adults in their care plans. The care plans specified that any situation identified as abuse or potential abuse would be reported per facility protocol. On the evening in question, a CNA heard a thud and a resident shouting from behind a closed door while another CNA was providing care, and also overheard a second resident telling the same CNA to stop being rough. The CNA did not report these concerns until her next shift, two days later, stating that there was no one available to report to at the end of her shift and that she was unsure if what she witnessed constituted potential abuse. The delay in reporting meant that the alleged perpetrator continued to work additional shifts before being suspended pending investigation. The facility's initial report to the State Agency was made after the delayed internal report, and the follow-up investigation report was not submitted within the required five-day period. The DON later discovered that the report had not been submitted due to a possible system error or user mistake. The facility's policy required immediate reporting of all alleged violations and completion of the internal investigation within five working days, which was not followed in this instance.
Food Safety Lapses in Kitchen and Beverage Temperature Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary environment for food preparation and distribution. During a follow-up kitchen inspection, an EVS staff member entered the kitchen, walked through the food preparation and clean dishes areas, and exited without wearing a hair net. The EVS staff member stated she knew hair nets were required in the kitchen and that she should have been wearing one. A Dietary staff member stated that everyone who enters the kitchen is required to wear a hair net, and the Nursing Home Administrator later agreed that everyone who goes into the kitchen is required to wear a hair net. The facility also did not ensure cold beverages were checked and documented at the required temperature before being served to residents. Surveyors observed trays being loaded with cups of milk and juice that had been sitting on a cart outside the cooler, and a Dietary Aide stated she was responsible for checking the temperatures before service and had taken them, but had forgotten to document them. Review of the temperature logs showed no documentation of milk or supplement temperatures for some lunches and no beverage temperatures recorded for supper on the logs reviewed. The Dietary Manager stated beverages such as milk and juice that are pre-poured and covered before lunch should be checked with a thermometer at every meal and recorded by the Dietary Aide on duty, and the Nursing Home Administrator agreed that food temperatures need to be recorded.
Incomplete Nutrition Assessments Led to Inaccurate MDS
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure the accuracy of the MDS assessment for one resident, R11, because required nutrition assessments for quarterly MDS completion were not completed. R11 was admitted to the facility and had diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, chronic kidney disease, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and hypothyroidism. The 6/27/25 MDS indicated R11 was severely cognitively impaired, had clear speech, could make self understood and understand what was said, required partial assistance with hygiene and dressing, and needed supervision for eating, mobility, and position changes. R11's care plan identified risk for altered body mass and nutrition related to therapeutic diet, Alzheimer's, dementia, and diabetes, with interventions for weekly weights, notification of RD and MD for weight changes, and RD assessment on admit, readmit, significant change, and as needed. Record review showed the quarterly nutrition assessments required for the quarterly MDS were not consistently completed. After R11 was readmitted in the second quarter of 2024, dietary did not complete the quarterly assessment for the third and fourth quarters of 2024, the second quarter of 2025, and the third quarter was pending. The last nutrition assessment scored an 8, indicating risk for malnutrition. Dietary progress notes were also inconsistent, with the CDM completing a nutrition risk assessment on 6/29/24 only and missing the third and fourth quarter notes, while the RD completed the annual assessment on 7/27/24 but no RD annual assessment was completed in 2025. The CDM stated, "We missed the assessment in June. I don't know how," and acknowledged quarterly nutrition assessments should be completed, while the MDS Coordinator stated nutrition assessments are part of the quarterly MDS assessment.
Failure to Update Fall Interventions After Resident Falls
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards and did not provide adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 2 residents, R7 and R11. The report states that the facility failed to initiate immediate interventions after falls, failed to investigate the root cause of falls, and failed to review and revise fall-related care plan interventions for R7. It also states that a new intervention for R11 to encourage the resident to sleep in the resident’s own bed was documented separately, but was not included in the care plan or CNA kardex. R7 was admitted with vascular dementia, epilepsy, and anxiety disorder, and had severe cognitive impairment on the most recent MDS. R7 was assessed as high risk for falls on multiple Falls Data Collection Assessments and had a care plan with numerous fall interventions already in place. The record showed multiple falls, including an unwitnessed fall while attempting to self-transfer, a fall after walking away from the dining room table without assistance or a wheelchair, and a witnessed controlled lowering to the floor in the shower room. Survey review noted that the fall documentation did not include immediate interventions to prevent future falls, did not identify the root cause in some incidents, and did not show updated fall interventions in the care plan. R11 was admitted with diagnoses including diabetes, chronic kidney disease, Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, and hypothyroidism, and was severely cognitively impaired on MDS. R11’s care plan identified fall risk and included general safety interventions, but the CNA kardex did not direct staff to encourage R11 to sleep in R11’s own bed. After an unwitnessed fall in which R11 was found on the floor next to the spouse’s bed, the documentation stated that R11 was not fully awake when attempting to self-transfer and rolled out of the spouse’s bed. Survey review found no immediate fall-prevention intervention in the documentation, and the only note about encouraging R11 to sleep in the resident’s own bed was on a separate paper, not in the care plan or CNA kardex.
Incomplete pain assessment and care planning for resident with chronic pain
Penalty
Summary
Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services was not adequately done for R27. R27 was admitted with diagnoses including encephalopathy, rhabdomyolysis, chronic pain, depression, and anxiety disorder, and the admission MDS noted a BIMS score of 08/14 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. R27 received scheduled and PRN pain medications, and the care plan stated pain interventions should include documenting effectiveness, assessing location, frequency, duration, intensity, and attempting non-pharmacological measures. However, the pain assessments documented only a severity score and did not include quality, duration, location, or onset, and non-pharmacological interventions were not noted. The MAR documented pain medications were given per order with follow-up noted only as "effective." Surveyor observation and interviews showed R27 stated she had pain "all the time" and said the facility was "not really" addressing her pain concerns. LPN C stated pain assessments should include severity, location, characteristics, and quality, and that non-pharmacological interventions should be used and documented. DON B stated pain assessments should include severity, characteristics, duration, and quality, but also stated that for chronic pain these details were not typically documented with every assessment and that weekly resident satisfaction with pain management was completed but not documented. R27's care plan did not include the resident's desired or tolerable pain level.
Failure to Prime Insulin Pen Before Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that ensured the accurate acquiring, dispensing, administering, storage, and disposal of drugs and biologicals when LPN C administered insulin to R34 without first priming the insulin pen. Facility administration procedures stated that the pen must be primed before the resident dose is set and insulin is injected, using an air shot to remove air bubbles and ensure the pen and needle are working properly. R34 was admitted with diagnoses including epilepsy, hemiplegia following cerebral infarction, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and had an order for Lantus (insulin glargine) 50 units subcutaneously in the morning. During observation, LPN C placed a new disposable insulin needle on R34's Lantus pen, dialed the pen to 50 units, and administered the insulin into R34's abdomen without priming the pen. When interviewed, LPN C stated she had never been instructed to prime insulin pens and had never primed them in the past. The DON stated the expectation was that insulin pens are primed with 2 units prior to dosing and then instructed LPN C on how to prime the pen.
Unnecessary Antidepressant Use Without Adequate Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure that one resident’s drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications when R4 was prescribed citalopram without adequate indication. R4 was admitted with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, developmental disorder of speech and language, and mild cognitive impairment. The admission MDS dated 08/18/25 noted BIMS was not completed because the resident was rarely/never understood, and the PHQ-9 OV score was 02, indicating minimal depression symptoms. R4’s care plan, initiated on 09/10/25, included mood symptoms related to adjustment disorder with depressed mood and interventions to administer medications as ordered, monitor side effects and effectiveness, and monitor mood for depression-related symptoms. The physician ordered Celexa 10 mg daily for adjustment disorder with depressed mood after a communication from the caregiver/guardian stated the resident seemed depressed, was flat, rarely smiled, and turned away when upset, and asked for an antidepressant for situational depression. Survey review found no documented behavior or mood symptoms related to depression in the resident’s behavior monitoring, and no provider assessment documenting review of behavior or mood monitoring before the antidepressant was ordered. The DON stated the facility frequently relied on family and caregiver input to determine antidepressant use, that staff had not assessed R4 for depressive mood or behaviors before starting the medication, and that no assessment was done for alternative causes such as pain.
Infection Control Lapses During Resident Care and Room Entry
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This affected 2 of 2 residents reviewed for infection control, R2 and R9. The facility policy on handwashing stated that staff should wash hands before and after physical contact with each resident, after handling contaminated sources, and after using the bathroom, blowing the nose, or covering a sneeze or cough. R2 was admitted with diagnoses including dementia, major depressive disorder, cardiomegaly, COPD, osteoarthritis, and urinary retention, and the MDS indicated severe cognitive impairment with substantial assistance needed for hygiene, dressing, and position changes. During morning cares, CNA F removed R2's soiled brief and continued personal care with contaminated gloves, then changed the pad and top sheet on R2's bed while still wearing those gloves. CNA F later applied barrier cream after removing gloves but did not perform hand hygiene before putting on new gloves. In a separate observation in R9's room, EM D was helping with the TV and holding the remote when EM D sneezed without covering the nose or mouth, continued the task, and left the room without wiping surfaces or performing hand hygiene. The DON stated staff are expected to wash hands before entering and after leaving a room, after touching surfaces, during cares, before putting on gloves, and when removing them.
Deficiency in Respiratory Care for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards for a resident with multiple serious health conditions, including COPD, congestive heart failure, stroke, and stage 5 kidney disease, who is also receiving hospice services. The resident was observed using oxygen via a nasal cannula continuously, but the oxygen was set at 2 liters per minute instead of the physician-ordered 3 liters per minute. Additionally, the facility did not maintain proper records of when the nasal cannula tubing was changed or when the oxygen concentrator filter was cleaned, as required by the physician's orders. During the survey, the LPN was unaware of the correct oxygen flow rate and could not confirm when the tubing and filters were last serviced. The Director of Nursing confirmed the incorrect oxygen flow rate and the presence of dust on the oxygen concentrator filter, indicating it had not been cleaned as required. The facility also failed to provide the manufacturer instructions or policy and procedure for oxygen/respiratory care when requested by the surveyor.
Infection Control Deficiency During Resident Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices during the care of a resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple medical conditions, including dementia, cerebral palsy, stroke, type 2 diabetes, epilepsy, and left-sided paralysis. The resident, who requires assistance for mobility and uses a Broda chair and Hoyer lift, was observed receiving pericare from two CNAs. During this process, CNA D did not sanitize her hands after removing gloves following pericare and before handling the resident's dentures, which is a breach of infection control protocols. Additionally, CNA C improperly disposed of soiled water from the wash basin in a sink where the resident's denture cup was present, indicating a lack of awareness of proper sanitation practices. When questioned by the surveyor, CNA C admitted to not knowing the correct procedure. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that hand hygiene should be performed after glove removal and that wash basins should be emptied in the toilet, highlighting a deficiency in staff training and adherence to infection control standards.
Failure to Report and Document Resident Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement its written policies and procedures when an incident of caregiver neglect was not reported to the administrator immediately. A resident with significant cognitive impairment and requiring extensive assistance for mobility and transfers was improperly transferred by a CNA alone, contrary to the care plan that required assistance from two people or a mechanical Hoyer lift. During the transfer, the CNA tripped over the resident's non-functional leg, resulting in the resident falling to the floor and suffering a swollen hip. Despite the incident, it was not reported to the appropriate personnel, and there was no documentation of the fall. Interviews revealed that the CNA involved in the incident reported the fall to an RN, who assessed the resident but did not report the incident to the administration. The DON was unaware of the fall and only knew of the CNA's foot injury. The facility's policy requires staff to report falls immediately to the charge nurse, who should assess the resident, provide interventions, and investigate the root cause to determine if caregiver neglect occurred. However, this process was not followed, and the CNA's misconduct was not reported to the administration.
Failure to Provide Timely Toileting and Hygiene Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary services for two residents, R9 and R4, to maintain good grooming, toileting, and personal hygiene. R9, who has medical diagnoses including diabetes mellitus type 2, a recent cerebral infarction, unspecified depression, and dementia, requires partial to moderate assistance for daily activities and is dependent on staff for toileting hygiene. Despite the care plan indicating scheduled toileting every two hours, R9 was not assisted with toileting for over four hours, resulting in R9 sitting in a soiled brief, which caused redness and wrinkling of the skin. R4, admitted with diagnoses including heart failure, cellulitis, chronic kidney disease, and a stage 1 pressure injury, also experienced a lack of timely assistance. R4's care plan included a toileting schedule, but during a 79-minute observation, R4's call light was ignored multiple times by various staff members, including the DON and CNAs. R4 repeatedly requested assistance to use the bathroom but was not helped until much later, resulting in incontinence care being delayed. The deficiencies were attributed to staffing issues, with new and inexperienced CNAs being assigned to heavy halls without adequate support. The DON and LPNs acknowledged the responsibility to ensure care according to written care plans but cited challenges in staffing and communication as contributing factors to the failure in providing timely care. The facility's policy on responding to call lights was not adhered to, further exacerbating the situation.
Failure to Prevent and Manage Pressure Ulcers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate pressure ulcer care and prevention for three residents at high risk for pressure injuries. Resident R9, who has multiple medical conditions including diabetes and dementia, was observed for over four hours without being repositioned, despite being at high risk for pressure injuries due to immobility and incontinence. R9 was found with a red and wrinkled buttocks, indicating prolonged pressure and exposure to urine and feces. The care plan for R9 included repositioning every two hours and the use of pressure relief boots, but these interventions were not consistently implemented. Resident R5, who has scoliosis and cerebral palsy, was also not repositioned adequately. Despite having a pressure ulcer on the right scapula, R5 was observed in a supine position with pressure on the affected area for over four hours. The care plan required repositioning every two hours, but this was not followed, and the resident was left in a position that exacerbated the existing pressure injury. Resident R27, with a history of infection and diabetes, was observed without the required Podus boots for heel protection. The boots were supposed to be worn at all times to prevent pressure injuries, but they were found across the room, and the resident's heels were lying directly on the bed. Despite the care plan and physician orders, the staff failed to ensure the boots were applied, leading to the reopening of a previously healed heel wound.
Inadequate Supervision and Assistance for Residents at Risk of Falls
Penalty
Summary
Two residents at risk for falls did not receive adequate supervision and assistance devices, leading to deficiencies in their care. The first resident, R20, who has significant cognitive impairment and requires the assistance of two staff members for transfers, was improperly transferred by a single CNA, resulting in a fall. Despite the care plan specifying the use of a Hoyer lift and assistance from two staff members, CNA M attempted a stand pivot transfer alone, causing both the CNA and R20 to fall. Although the incident was reported to RN L, there was no documentation of the fall or subsequent assessments in R20's electronic health record, and the Director of Nursing was unaware of the incident. The second resident, R27, who also has significant cognitive impairment and requires a knee immobilizer for stability during transfers, was observed being transferred without the immobilizer by CNA G. R27's care plan clearly states the need for the immobilizer during transfers to prevent injury, yet CNA G failed to apply it, citing the resident's recent return from the hospital as the reason. Interviews with the LPN and PTA confirmed the necessity of the immobilizer for R27's safety, but the deficiency was observed by the surveyor. These incidents highlight a lack of adherence to care plans and proper reporting procedures, resulting in inadequate supervision and assistance for residents at risk of falls. The failure to follow established protocols and document incidents properly contributed to the deficiencies observed by the surveyors.
Inadequate Staffing Leads to Delayed Resident Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility was found to have insufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of residents, as evidenced by observations and interviews conducted by surveyors. The staffing plan indicated a certain number of licensed nurses and nurse aides, but observations showed that the facility was not adequately staffed to meet the needs of residents, particularly those dependent on staff for activities of daily living and mechanical lift transfers. Staff interviews confirmed that the facility required two trained staff for mechanical lift transfers, but the staffing levels were insufficient to meet these needs. One resident, identified as R4, was observed to have their call light on for 79 minutes without receiving assistance, despite multiple staff members walking past the room. R4, who has several medical conditions including heart failure and chronic kidney disease, required substantial assistance with toileting and transfers. During the observation period, R4 was not assisted in a timely manner, leading to a delay in receiving necessary care. Interviews with staff revealed that the workload and staffing levels were not sufficient to meet the needs of residents like R4. Another resident, R9, who has a pressure-related deep tissue injury and is at high risk for additional pressure injuries, was not offered toileting or repositioning for over four hours. This lack of care resulted in redness and wrinkling of the skin due to prolonged pressure and incontinence. Similarly, R2, who has Alzheimer's disease and dementia, was observed with their call light on for over an hour without receiving assistance. Despite multiple staff members walking past, R2 did not receive the necessary help to use the bathroom and get into bed. These incidents highlight the facility's failure to provide adequate staffing to ensure timely and appropriate care for residents.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 71 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Shell Lake
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dove Healthcare - Spooner | 10.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Care And Rehab - Cumberland | 16.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 14 | 0 |
| Frederic Nursing And Rehab Community | 19.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 18 | 0 |
| United Pioneer Home | 22.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Dove Healthcare - Rice Lake | 24.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 15 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Shell Lake Health Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.