Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at River Edge Rehabilitation And Nursing during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Failure to protect cognitively impaired residents from sexual abuse: A resident with dementia and a history of sexual inappropriateness was observed on more than one occasion groping two severely cognitively impaired residents, including a nonverbal resident who could not report the abuse. Staff interviews and clinical notes showed the behavior was known, but the resident was only redirected and there was no increase in supervision or restriction of access to other residents.
A facility failed to implement its abuse prevention and investigation policies when a severely cognitively impaired resident with a history of inappropriate sexual behavior sexually touched two other residents. Staff observed the resident placing his hand inside one resident's shirt and pants on more than one occasion and also observed similar sexual contact with another resident. The affected residents were cognitively impaired and one was nonverbal, and interviews confirmed there was no increase in supervision or other restrictions in place when the incidents occurred.
Failure to Timely Report Allegations of Abuse: The facility did not timely report allegations of abuse involving two residents with severe cognitive impairment. Staff documented one resident repeatedly touching another resident inappropriately, but the former ADON did not report the incident beyond management and did not notify the DON, Administrator, or SSA. The DON later stated the incidents should have been reported. The facility policy required reporting alleged abuse within 2 hours if abuse was involved, or within 24 hours if not involving serious bodily injury.
Failure to thoroughly investigate alleged abuse incidents involving residents with dementia. A resident with severe cognitive impairment was observed in inappropriate sexual contact with another cognitively impaired resident on more than one occasion, but the facility delayed the investigation and did not interview all staff with knowledge of the events or other potentially informed staff. Another incident involving the same resident attempting sexual contact with a third resident was documented in a nurse's note but was never investigated. The DON confirmed the investigation gaps and the missed investigation.
Staff failed to maintain resident dignity during meal service by not serving all residents at the table at the same time, entering rooms without knocking, neglecting hand hygiene between residents, and standing rather than sitting while assisting with feeding, despite available chairs. Delays in meal distribution, lack of supervision, and failure to promptly assist dependent residents were observed, contrary to facility policy and expectations outlined by the DON.
Staff failed to update care plans for several residents, resulting in outdated or inaccurate documentation of DNR status, hospice enrollment, falls, injuries, and equipment use. Care plans did not reflect current physician orders or residents' actual care needs, and staff interviews confirmed that required updates were missed.
Multiple residents did not receive care as ordered by their physicians, including incomplete or missing neurological checks after falls, failure to initiate ordered therapy, and missed or incorrectly timed weight and vital sign monitoring. Staff were often unaware of specific orders or protocols, and documentation was incomplete or inconsistent, leading to lapses in required assessments and treatments.
Staff did not serve the meal listed on the posted menu and failed to inform residents of the change, as the cook swapped the planned meal with another due to unavailable ingredients without notifying the dietary manager or updating the menu. Residents were not made aware of the change and reported that this had occurred on previous occasions.
Staff did not store, label, or distribute food in a sanitary manner, as multiple opened food items in various refrigerators and freezers were found without proper labels or dates. Personal beverages and snacks were stored with facility food, and some containers showed signs of spoilage. The dietary manager was aware of these issues and confirmed that labeling and dating are required for all food items.
Staff failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records for four residents, including missing documentation of wound care, falls, post-fall assessments, neuro checks, and orthopedic appointments. In several cases, required entries were absent from the medical record, and staff interviews confirmed that standard documentation practices were not followed.
Staff failed to follow infection control protocols during meal distribution when a CNA returned a meal tray from a resident on enhanced barrier precautions to a cart containing undelivered trays, and another staff member placed a used tray with uneaten food and trash onto the same cart. The DON confirmed that this practice was not in line with facility policy, which requires trays to be distributed before used trays are collected to prevent contamination.
A resident with cognitive impairments was repeatedly observed in public areas wearing only a hospital gown, leaving parts of his body exposed, despite personal clothing being available in his room. Staff did not ensure the resident was dressed in his own clothes until the issue was identified by a unit manager, who acknowledged the dignity concern.
Two residents experienced unwitnessed falls that were not properly documented in the clinical record, including missing details on immediate assessments, neurological checks, and actions taken. In both cases, staff and DON confirmed that facility policy and professional standards require such documentation, but only risk management forms or provider notes—neither part of the official clinical record—contained relevant information. This resulted in incomplete records regarding the circumstances and care provided after the falls.
Facility staff failed to provide safe and appropriate dialysis care for three residents by not obtaining necessary physician orders for fistula monitoring, not arranging transportation for dialysis appointments, and not monitoring dialysis access sites or notifying medical providers when a resident declined treatment. Interviews and record reviews confirmed these deficiencies in care and documentation.
A resident who fell and complained of left hip and lower extremity pain did not receive a stat x-ray in a timely manner despite orders from the provider. Staff interviews indicated that x-rays were expected within eight hours, but there was no documented follow-up with the mobile x-ray provider, and the resident was ultimately sent to the emergency department at the family's request. The facility's records did not show evidence of timely action or escalation prior to the resident's transfer.
Failure to Protect Cognitively Impaired Residents from Sexual Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect two residents, both of whom had severe cognitive impairment, from sexual abuse by another resident with a known history of sexual inappropriateness. R15 had a diagnosis of unspecified dementia and a BIMS score of 3 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R109 also had dementia and was nonverbal, with a quarterly MDS showing that a BIMS could not be completed because the resident was rarely or never understood. R81 had unspecified dementia and a BIMS score of 3 out of 15, also indicating severe cognitive impairment. Clinical notes and staff interviews showed that R15 was observed on more than one occasion placing his hand inside R109’s pants and shirt while she was in the activity room. One CNA reported that R15 had his hand down R109’s shirt and in her pants, and another note documented that he was observed sticking his hand up her pants. Staff stated R109 was nonverbal and would not have been able to call for help or report the incident. Interviews also showed there was no increase in R15’s supervision and no restrictions on his access to R109 or other residents after these events. The record also showed prior sexual behavior involving R15 and R81. A nurse’s note documented that R15 had to be redirected for sexual behavior after being observed attempting to rub another resident’s leg, and staff interviews stated that R15 had put his hand in R81’s pants and shirt on more than one occasion. Staff reported that these behaviors were known, but they were only redirected or moved closer to staff, and no one reported the incidents to the DON. The DON stated the facility concluded R15 sexually groped R109 on two separate occasions and was unaware of incidents involving R81.
Failure to Prevent and Investigate Resident-on-Resident Sexual Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement its abuse prevention and investigation policies when two residents were sexually abused by another resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of inappropriate sexual behavior. R15 had a BIMS score of 3 out of 15 on annual MDS review, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R109 had non-Alzheimer's dementia and was unable to complete the BIMS because she was rarely or never understood. R81 also had unspecified dementia and a BIMS score of 3 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. For R109, staff observed R15 with his hand down her shirt and in her pants in the activity room after lunch, and on another occasion with his hand up the pant leg of her pants to her knee near the nursing station. CNA9, CNA10, and nursing staff documented that R15 was separated from R109 after each incident. The record also showed that R15 had a history of inappropriate sexual behavior, including prior redirection for sexual behavior involving another resident. Interviews with UM/LPN1, UM/LPN2, CNA10, and the DON confirmed that R109 was nonverbal and unable to report the incidents herself, and that there was no increase in R15's supervision or restriction of access to other residents at the time. For R81, a nurse's note documented that R15 had to be redirected for sexual behavior after being observed attempting to rub another resident's leg, and CNA3 stated she observed R15 putting his hand in R81's pants and shirt on more than one occasion. CNA3 said the behavior was only met with redirection and moving R15 to the nurse's station or back to his room, and she was not aware of any change in his supervision or plan of care. The DON stated she was unaware of the incident involving R81 and did not learn of the incidents involving R109 until later, confirming that the investigation was not conducted until after the incidents were reported and that no protective measures or increased supervision had been put in place before that time.
Failure to Timely Report Allegations of Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report allegations of abuse in a timely manner for two residents, including one resident with unspecified dementia and severe cognitive impairment and another resident with non-Alzheimer's dementia and severe cognitive impairment. Review of the records showed that one resident was found with his hand down the other resident's shirt and in her pants on one day, and then again the next day was found with his hand up her pant leg to her knee. Nursing notes documented that staff separated the residents and notified management, but the former ADON stated she did not take further action and did not report the incident to the DON, Administrator, or state survey agency because she believed notifying management was sufficient. The facility's incident report showed the allegation was reported to Administration three days after the first event. A separate resident with unspecified dementia and a BIMS score of 3 was also involved in a prior incident in which the same resident was observed attempting to rub another resident's leg and had to be redirected for sexual behavior. During interview, the DON stated none of the incidents from the prior sexual behavior event or the later incidents were reported to her, although she said they should have been. The facility policy required alleged abuse to be reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours if abuse was involved, or not later than 24 hours if abuse did not involve serious bodily injury.
Failure to Thoroughly Investigate Alleged Abuse Incidents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct thorough abuse investigations for three residents reviewed for abuse. R15 had a diagnosis of unspecified dementia and an annual MDS showing a BIMS score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R109 had non-Alzheimer's dementia and a quarterly MDS showing the BIMS could not be completed because the resident was rarely or never understood. The facility's FRI and Five Day Letter documented that R15 was found with his hand down R109's shirt and in her pants in the activity room after lunch, and on the following day was found with his hand up the pant leg of R109 to her knee near the nursing station. The incidents were not investigated until several days later. The investigation completed on 06/10/25 was not thorough and did not include interviews with all staff who had knowledge of the incidents or other staff who may have known about R15's behavior or other potentially affected residents. In addition, R81, who also had unspecified dementia and a BIMS score of 3, had a nurse's note documenting that R15 had to be redirected for sexual behavior after being observed attempting to rub another resident's leg, but this incident was never investigated. During interview, the DON confirmed the delay in investigating the incidents involving R15 and R109 and stated that all staff with knowledge should have been interviewed; she also confirmed the 03/17/25 incident involving R81 should have been investigated.
Failure to Maintain Resident Dignity and Proper Supervision During Meal Service
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to maintain resident dignity during meal distribution on one of two units, as evidenced by several observed actions and inactions. Staff did not serve all residents at the table simultaneously, and some residents in the TV room experienced significant delays in receiving their meals. Staff entered multiple resident rooms without knocking or announcing themselves, and did not consistently perform hand hygiene between assisting different residents. During meal service, a resident dependent on staff for feeding was left with a meal tray in front of him without immediate assistance, and another resident poured his beverage over his food without staff noticing or offering a replacement meal. Additionally, staff were observed standing while feeding residents, despite available chairs, rather than sitting beside them as required by facility policy. Interviews with the DON confirmed that staff were expected to knock before entering rooms, perform hand hygiene between residents, and sit beside residents while assisting with feeding. The DON acknowledged that residents needing assistance were to be served last to allow staff to help them, but observations showed lapses in supervision, such as a resident taking another's fork and lack of immediate staff presence. The facility's policy on promoting and maintaining resident dignity during mealtimes was reviewed, which included requirements for respectful treatment and sitting while feeding residents. However, the facility did not have a specific policy regarding meal distribution, and the observed practices did not align with the stated expectations.
Failure to Revise and Update Comprehensive Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plans for four residents, resulting in care plans that did not accurately reflect current physician orders, clinical events, or the residents' care needs. For one resident with multiple complex diagnoses and severely impaired cognition, the care plan was not updated to reflect a change to do not resuscitate (DNR) status, enrollment in hospice services, or a recent fall, despite these being documented in the clinical record and physician orders. The care plan continued to list the resident as full code and omitted significant changes in condition and care approach. Another resident's care plan was outdated and included interventions and equipment that were no longer applicable, such as the use of assistive bars for bed mobility and reminders to lock wheelchair brakes, even though the resident had been bedridden for years and no longer used a wheelchair. The care plan also referenced wound care for a non-existent wound and listed a mattress type that did not match current physician orders. Staff interviews confirmed a lack of awareness regarding these discrepancies and the removal of certain equipment. For two additional residents, care plans were not revised to include recent falls, injuries, or changes in seating systems. One resident's care plan failed to document a fall with injury and did not update the type of chair used, resulting in contradictory and outdated interventions. Another resident who sustained two falls, including one resulting in a hip fracture and surgical repair, had no documentation of these events or the resulting non-weight bearing status in the care plan. Staff interviews confirmed that care plans should have been updated following these significant changes, but the updates were missed.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Post-Fall Assessments, Therapy, Weights, and Vital Signs
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to follow physician orders and established protocols for multiple residents, resulting in deficiencies related to post-fall assessments, neurological checks, therapy orders, and vital sign monitoring. In several cases, after residents experienced falls—some unwitnessed and some resulting in injuries such as fractures—staff did not complete neurological assessments as ordered or per facility protocol. For example, one resident who fell and sustained abrasions did not receive timely or complete neurological checks, with significant gaps between assessments. Another resident who suffered a hip fracture after an unwitnessed fall had no documented nursing assessment or complete neurological evaluations, and vital signs recorded were outdated. Staff interviews revealed uncertainty about the frequency and policy for neuro checks, and the facility was unable to provide a clear policy during the survey. In addition to post-fall care deficiencies, the facility did not carry out therapy and weight monitoring orders as prescribed by physicians. One resident with a right proximal humerus fracture had orders from an orthopedic surgeon for range of motion therapy, but therapy staff were unaware of these orders and did not initiate the prescribed therapy until the surveyor's intervention. The same resident also had orders for daily and weekly weights, but the documentation showed that weights were not obtained as ordered, with missed days and incorrect timing. Another resident with orders for daily weights had only one weight recorded, and the unit manager confirmed the orders were not followed. Further, the facility failed to follow a physician's order to obtain full vital signs every morning for a resident, instead only monitoring blood pressure. Staff interviews confirmed that the order was not being followed as written, and the medication administration record reflected only blood pressure checks. The facility was unable to provide a policy for following physician orders when requested. These findings were confirmed through observation, record review, and staff interviews, and were acknowledged by facility leadership during the survey.
Failure to Follow Posted Menu and Inform Residents of Meal Changes
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to follow the posted menu for residents on both units, as observed during a lunchtime meal service. The posted menu listed Salisbury steak, steamed rice, squash, brown gravy, dinner roll, strawberry shortcake, condiments, and beverage of choice, but the meal served did not match this menu. The dietary manager reported that the cook changed the menu without informing him, swapping the planned meal with the next day's menu due to the ground beef not being thawed. The dietary manager was not made aware of the change until after the meal was prepared and served, and the posted menu was not updated to reflect the change. Residents interviewed stated they were not informed of the menu change and had expected the meal listed on the posted menu. Residents also reported that this was not the first time the posted menu was not followed and that they were not always informed of such changes.
Failure to Properly Store and Label Food Items in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to store, label, and distribute food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen. During a kitchen tour, surveyors observed multiple opened food items in the reach-in refrigerator, walk-in refrigerator, and walk-in freezer without proper labels or dates indicating when they were opened. Personal beverages and snacks were stored alongside facility food items in the reach-in refrigerator. In the walk-in refrigerator, items such as three-bean salad, vanilla pudding, cooked spaghetti noodles, corn, ham slices, mayonnaise, and cottage cheese were found without any labels or open dates. The walk-in freezer contained sandwich meats, meatballs, and peppers also lacking proper labeling. Some containers, such as the one containing ham, showed signs of spoilage, including a film on top of the water. The dietary manager acknowledged awareness of the unlabeled and undated food items and confirmed that all food items are required to be labeled with an open date and a use-by date before storage.
Failure to Maintain Complete and Accurate Clinical Records
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records for four residents, resulting in multiple documentation deficiencies. For one resident with wounds requiring daily treatment, the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) lacked signatures on several days, and there was no alternative documentation in the progress notes to confirm whether treatments were completed. Interviews with nursing staff revealed uncertainty about whether unsigned treatments were performed or simply not documented, and one nurse reported that treatments were sometimes missed at shift change. The resident was unable to recall receiving treatments or even having wounds, further complicating verification. Another resident experienced a fall, but there was no documentation in the clinical record regarding the incident, the assessment performed at the time, or the circumstances surrounding the fall. Although an incident form existed, it was not part of the medical record, and no neurological assessments were documented as required by facility policy. Both the LPN unit manager and the DON confirmed the absence of required documentation and stated that standard practice was not followed. The facility's fall prevention policy specifically required documentation of all assessments and actions in the clinical record, which was not done in this case. Additional deficiencies included missing documentation of a resident's orthopedic appointment and incomplete neuro checks following a fall. The orthopedic appointment note was not present in the clinical record until it was later obtained from the physician's office, and staff could not initially locate it. For neuro checks, the documentation labeled as such only included vital signs and omitted required neurological assessments, with staff acknowledging that the records were incomplete and not in accordance with expectations. Another resident who sustained a hip fracture after a fall had no documentation in the clinical record regarding the fall's circumstances, staff assessments, or actions taken, with only a brief provider note and an incomplete post-fall review present. The DON confirmed these documentation gaps and acknowledged that incident reports were not part of the clinical record.
Failure to Follow Infection Control Practices During Meal Distribution
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to follow infection control practices during meal distribution on the A-wing. During lunch service, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) was observed taking a meal tray into the room of a resident on enhanced barrier precautions, leaving the door open, and then returning the tray to the meal cart containing trays that had not yet been distributed. The CNA stated that it was acceptable to return the tray because it had not been placed directly in front of the resident and the trays were not touching. Additionally, another staff member placed a used meal tray, containing uneaten food and trash from a different resident, back onto the same cart with trays that had not yet been served. The director of nursing (DON) confirmed that all resident trays should be distributed before any used trays are retrieved and returned to the cart, citing infection control reasons. Facility policy reviewed by the surveyors stated that foods and beverages must be delivered in a manner to prevent contamination. These observations and staff interviews demonstrated a failure to adhere to established infection prevention and control protocols during meal service.
Failure to Maintain Resident Dignity by Not Dressing in Personal Clothing
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to ensure that a resident was dressed in personal clothing, resulting in repeated instances where the resident was left in a hospital gown with parts of his body exposed in common areas. On multiple occasions, the resident was observed sitting in a geri-chair in public spaces, such as the TV room and hallway, wearing only a hospital gown that left his back, legs, thighs, incontinence brief, and stomach exposed. These observations occurred during meal service and throughout the morning, with the resident visible to staff, visitors, and other residents. Despite the presence of personal clothing in the resident's room, staff did not dress the resident appropriately until after the issue was brought to the attention of the unit manager and other facility leadership. The unit manager acknowledged the dignity concern upon seeing the resident exposed and confirmed that the resident should have been covered. Staff interviews indicated that there were personal clothes available and that, if needed, clothing could be retrieved from a lost and found. The resident was noted to have cognitive impairments, which may have limited his ability to advocate for himself.
Failure to Document Falls and Assessments in Clinical Records
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to follow professional standards of care for two residents by not documenting unwitnessed falls and the subsequent assessments, actions taken, and circumstances of the incidents. For one resident with multiple complex diagnoses, including dementia and cognitive impairment, there was no clinical record documentation of an unwitnessed fall, immediate assessment, or neurological checks, despite a nurse practitioner note referencing the fall and a risk management form indicating actions were taken. The risk management form was not part of the official medical record, and the facility's own policy required documentation of all assessments and actions in the clinical record. In another case, a resident who had previously suffered traumatic injuries experienced an unwitnessed fall resulting in a hip fracture. The only documentation in the clinical record was a provider note stating the resident fell, had pain, and was sent to the emergency room. There was no documentation by nursing staff regarding the circumstances of the fall, the resident's condition at the time, or the assessments performed prior to transfer. The DON confirmed that the expected practice was not followed, and the event synopsis provided was not part of the clinical record. Interviews with nursing staff and review of facility policy confirmed that the standard procedure after a fall includes assessment, documentation in the clinical record, notification of physician and family, and initiation of neurological checks. In both cases, these steps were not documented as required, and the clinical records lacked essential information about the incidents and the care provided.
Failure to Provide Safe and Appropriate Dialysis Care and Services
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to provide appropriate dialysis care and services for three residents requiring dialysis. For one resident, there was no physician order for staff to monitor the dialysis fistula site in the left upper arm following readmission from the hospital. The resident reported that only dialysis staff checked the site, and facility staff rarely did so. A review of the clinical record confirmed the absence of orders for monitoring the fistula site, and staff interviews revealed that the omission was due to the admitting nurse forgetting to add the order upon readmission. Another resident did not have transportation arranged to attend scheduled dialysis appointments. The administrator stated that the facility was unaware the resident was a dialysis patient upon admission and encountered difficulties arranging stretcher transport and coordinating with the dialysis center. The director of nursing and transport coordinator confirmed that no transport was set up for the resident at the required time, and there was no documentation of transport arrangements for that period. For a third resident, staff failed to monitor the dialysis access port according to professional standards and did not notify the medical provider when the resident declined a dialysis session. The clinical record only noted the presence of a fistula in the admission assessment and care plan, with no documentation of regular monitoring for thrill and bruit or related physician orders. When the resident refused dialysis due to feeling unwell, staff did not inform the medical provider, despite acknowledging the importance of such notification. Interviews and record reviews confirmed the lack of documentation and communication regarding the missed dialysis session and access site monitoring.
Failure to Obtain Timely Stat X-Ray Following Resident Fall
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to obtain a stat x-ray in a timely manner for a resident who experienced a fall and complained of pain in the left lower extremity and hip. After the fall, the resident was assessed and a stat x-ray was ordered for the left hip, with additional orders for x-rays of the ankle and knee due to pain and visible bruising and swelling. Despite these orders, the x-rays were not obtained promptly, and there was no documented follow-up by staff with the mobile x-ray provider prior to the resident being sent to the emergency department. Interviews with staff revealed an expectation that stat x-rays should be completed within eight hours, and if not, the resident should be sent out for further evaluation. The resident's daughter expressed concern about the delay and the resident's ongoing pain during her visit. Clinical record review confirmed that the x-ray orders were placed, but there was no evidence of timely follow-up or escalation when the x-rays were not performed as expected. The facility's fall prevention policy required assessment, documentation, and physician notification after a fall, but did not ensure that the ordered diagnostic tests were completed in a timely manner. The resident was ultimately sent to the emergency department at the family's insistence, and did not return to the facility. No additional information or documentation was provided by the facility to demonstrate appropriate follow-up or resolution prior to the resident's transfer.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 88 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 3 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Waynesboro
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summit Square | 1.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Augusta Nursing And Rehabilitation | 2.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Shenandoah Nursing Home | 3.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Augusta Medical Ctr Skilled Ca | 4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Staunton Post Acute & Rehabilitation | 9.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for River Edge Rehabilitation And Nursing.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.