Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
E

Failure to Maintain Complete and Accurate Clinical Records

Waynesboro, Virginia Survey Completed on 08-07-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records for four residents, resulting in multiple documentation deficiencies. For one resident with wounds requiring daily treatment, the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) lacked signatures on several days, and there was no alternative documentation in the progress notes to confirm whether treatments were completed. Interviews with nursing staff revealed uncertainty about whether unsigned treatments were performed or simply not documented, and one nurse reported that treatments were sometimes missed at shift change. The resident was unable to recall receiving treatments or even having wounds, further complicating verification. Another resident experienced a fall, but there was no documentation in the clinical record regarding the incident, the assessment performed at the time, or the circumstances surrounding the fall. Although an incident form existed, it was not part of the medical record, and no neurological assessments were documented as required by facility policy. Both the LPN unit manager and the DON confirmed the absence of required documentation and stated that standard practice was not followed. The facility's fall prevention policy specifically required documentation of all assessments and actions in the clinical record, which was not done in this case. Additional deficiencies included missing documentation of a resident's orthopedic appointment and incomplete neuro checks following a fall. The orthopedic appointment note was not present in the clinical record until it was later obtained from the physician's office, and staff could not initially locate it. For neuro checks, the documentation labeled as such only included vital signs and omitted required neurological assessments, with staff acknowledging that the records were incomplete and not in accordance with expectations. Another resident who sustained a hip fracture after a fall had no documentation in the clinical record regarding the fall's circumstances, staff assessments, or actions taken, with only a brief provider note and an incomplete post-fall review present. The DON confirmed these documentation gaps and acknowledged that incident reports were not part of the clinical record.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙