Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around January 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Old Dominion Rehabilitation And Nursing during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Incomplete Assessment and Transfer Documentation: A resident with dementia, CAD, HF, and DM had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with ADLs. After a prior skin review and a later note documenting a boggy heel/deep tissue injury, the resident was found unresponsive on the floor and sent to the ER. The transfer record lacked an assessment, rationale for transfer, vital signs, and other pertinent information, and the facility had no written protocol for nurse interventions before transfer; the DON stated the documentation was unacceptable and incomplete.
Failure to Protect Residents from Sexual Abuse: The facility failed to protect vulnerable residents from sexual abuse involving a resident with dementia and severe cognitive impairment, a POA, and other residents with sexual behaviors. Records and interviews showed prior abuse and sexual incidents, yet the resident’s care plan was not updated with protections after the abuse, and another resident was found with his hand under a female resident’s shirt. Staff acknowledged the resident could not consent and that prior incidents had occurred.
A cognitively intact resident was misappropriated when the BOM used the resident’s personal credit card for rent and numerous online purchases without consent, totaling more than $10,000. The incident was discovered through the facility’s investigation and involved the wrongful use of the resident’s money and belongings.
The facility failed to complete the required water management risk assessment to identify where Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread, and staff did not consistently follow contact precautions for a resident with MSSA bacteremia. The resident had ESRD on intermittent dialysis, was ordered to remain on contact precautions, and was observed with a contact sign and PPE cart outside the room, but no separate trash cans for PPE or linens were present and an LPN entered the room without PPE.
Failure to Timely Report Alleged Abuse Incidents: The facility did not report multiple alleged abuse incidents involving residents within the required 2-hour timeframe. In one case, a CNA observed one resident in another resident’s room with inappropriate contact, but the report was not sent to the SA until the next day. In other incidents, allegations of sexual abuse and abuse between residents were reported many hours or days late, and the DON confirmed the reports were not submitted on time.
Failure to Provide Written Transfer and Bed Hold Notices The facility did not provide written transfer notices and bed hold notices for several residents who were sent to the hospital. One resident was transferred after becoming extremely drowsy and altered from baseline, another called 911 for an ER transfer, a third was sent out after hypotension during dialysis, and a fourth was transported after staff found him slumped over and hard to arouse. Staff and leadership could not find documentation showing the required notices were given, and one resident stated she never received any paperwork related to the transfer or bed hold.
A resident who could feed herself waited with her meal tray in front of her for tray set-up after it was delivered, and another resident reported that dining room residents were not served at the same time because staff left to serve the hallway before finishing the room. A CNA said the process was not right, and the DM and RD confirmed that dining room residents should be served together and tray set-up should occur when the meal is delivered.
The facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of a resident-to-resident abuse incident involving a resident with bipolar disorder, GAD, delusional disorders, and convulsions. The resident threatened another resident, threw water on the resident, cursed at the resident, and used racial slurs while staff intervened. The FRI showed no evidence that other residents were asked whether they felt safe or feared any resident, and the Administrator, DOO, and SSD confirmed those questions were not asked.
Inaccurate PASARR screening was completed for two residents with mental health diagnoses. One resident admitted with bipolar disorder had a PASARR Level I that did not identify the diagnosis, despite EMR documentation showing bipolar disorder and psychotropic medications. Another resident admitted with schizophrenia had an older PASARR that the DON said was inaccurate and should have been redone, but no updated screening could be located.
Incomplete Assessment and Transfer Documentation: A resident with dementia, CAD, HF, and DM had a BIMS score of 3/15 and required extensive assistance with ADLs. The record later noted a boggy heel/deep tissue injury and left foot drop, but when the resident was found unresponsive on the floor and sent to the ER, the transfer record lacked an assessment, rationale, vital signs, and baseline status. The DON stated the documentation was unacceptable and that a comprehensive assessment should have been completed before transfer.
Failure to provide foot care for a resident with impaired mobility and dependent personal hygiene needs. The resident was observed in bed with dry, flaking skin on both feet, and the resident stated the feet felt scratchy and had not been lotioned. A weekly skin review documented the skin as intact and not dry, while later observations and an LPN and CNA confirmed the dry, flaking condition. The facility policy required foot care and skin inspection during bathing.
Failure to Escort Resident to Appointment: A resident with hemiplegia/hemiparesis, respiratory failure, wheelchair use, and limited upper and lower extremity function was sent to a GI appointment without an escort. Records showed the resident was cognitively intact and alert/oriented, but family reported he was left outside the office and not dressed appropriately for cold weather. Staff confirmed the resident went alone, and interviews showed the facility lacked a policy for appointment transportation or escorts.
A resident with a history of stroke, vascular dementia, and right above-knee amputation had bilateral side rails in use for safety and repositioning, but the record did not show that alternatives were tried first, that the risks and benefits were reviewed with the resident or representative, or that informed consent was obtained. Staff stated the resident used the rails to turn and reposition, and the DON confirmed there were no documented risks or benefits addressed for the side rails.
Medication administration errors exceeded the allowed rate, with 3 errors in 27 opportunities. An RN gave G-tube meds without checking residual or tube placement despite orders for both, an LPN administered carvedilol without checking BP even though the order said to hold if systolic BP was below 120, and an RN gave Humalog Kwikpen insulin without priming the pen after attaching the needle. The DON, UM, and ADON confirmed the expected order requirements were not followed.
Meal Substitution and Pureed Diet Not Followed: A resident on a pureed diet did not receive the meal posted on the menu and was instead served an unposted substituted meal. The CNA was unsure of the items served, while the DM confirmed she used substitutions and did not puree pasta because of its texture. The RD stated she was unaware the DM was not pureeing the pasta and confirmed the resident should have received the menu meal.
Food Served at Improper Temperatures: A dietary review found that meals were not consistently served at palatable temperatures. A resident reported trays arriving cold and overcooked food, another said hot items were cold and cold items were warm, and a third said food did not smell good and was often cold. The RD confirmed hot foods should be hot and cold foods cold, and the DM measured cold pasta and juice at 62 degrees F on a test tray.
Incomplete Assessment and Transfer Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct and document a thorough assessment for one resident after a change in condition and transfer to the emergency room. The resident was admitted after an acute hospitalization and had diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and diabetes. The admission MDS coded the resident as severely cognitively impaired, with a BIMS score of 3 out of 15, and as requiring extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, personal hygiene, and toileting, while being totally dependent for bathing. The clinical record also showed a prior skin review dated 8/11/2022 with no skin impairment, but a nurse practitioner note dated 8/12/2022 documented warm, dry skin with a boggy left heel and a deep tissue injury, along with bilateral upper extremity strength of 5/5 and left foot drop. On 8/19/2022, a nurse documented that the resident was found on the floor unresponsive, 911 was called, and the resident was transferred to the emergency room. The transfer information under Section B - Key Clinical Information did not include an assessment of the resident's condition, a rationale for the transfer, vital signs, or other pertinent information, and it stated the resident was not alert without defining the resident's baseline. The facility also did not have a written protocol outlining a nurse's interventions before transfer to another level of care. During interview, the DON stated the documentation did not meet facility expectations and was unacceptable, and said the change should have been documented first with a comprehensive assessment including blood pressure, heart rate, respirations, oxygen saturation, and blood sugar if diabetic, along with fall process steps and notification of the provider and family.
Failure to Protect Residents from Sexual Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents were free from sexual abuse for two of nine residents reviewed for abuse. One resident with dementia and severe cognitive impairment was sexually abused by her power of attorney in the facility, and the facility also had prior knowledge of sexual abuse and sexual behavior involving other residents but did not put measures in place to protect her and other vulnerable residents. The report states the resident had a history of sexually inappropriate behaviors and was unable to make decisions regarding her care or finances. The resident was found in bed with another resident with no clothes on, and the facility investigation documented that the resident’s cognition did not allow her to provide proper consent. The record also showed a prior incident in which the same resident was sexually abused by her power of attorney in the facility, with statements indicating oral sex occurred. The facility’s records did not show that the resident’s care plan was updated with interventions to protect her after that incident. The facility also failed to protect another resident who was sexually abused by a different resident. That resident was found in the victim’s room with his hand under her shirt, and the facility substantiated the incident. The victim had Parkinson’s disease, dementia with behavioral disturbance, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, and depression, and required extensive assistance with bed mobility and transfers. The report further describes another incident involving a resident with cognitive impairment who was found engaged in sexual activity with the first resident, and the facility’s interviews showed staff awareness that the first resident had a history of sexual behaviors and could not consent.
Misappropriation of a Resident’s Credit Card by Business Office Manager
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a cognitively intact resident from misappropriation of property when the Business Office Manager used the resident’s personal credit card for personal expenses without consent. The resident’s quarterly MDS showed a BIMS score of 14 out of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The report states the BOM used the resident’s credit card to pay her rent for three months and to make numerous Amazon purchases, totaling over $10,000, which was identified through the facility’s incident investigation. The incident was reported by the BOM to the previous Administrator, and the report notes that the resident was reimbursed later. The facility’s abuse policy defined misappropriation as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful temporary or permanent use of a resident’s belongings or money without the resident’s consent. The survey findings identified this as a deficiency involving the wrongful use of the resident’s money and belongings.
Water Management Assessment Missing and Contact Precautions Not Followed
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete an assessment of the building to determine where Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread. Review of the Water Management Binder showed that the required building assessment had not been completed. During interview, the Maintenance Director confirmed that no building assessment had been done and stated he monitored the water system by testing water temperatures, changing filters in the ice machine and hot water heater, and running water in sinks, showers, and empty-room toilets. He also stated he was not aware that an assessment was needed for the water management program. During interview, the Administrator verified that the blueprint of the building had been found but the assessment of the building where Legionella could grow and spread was not found. The Administrator stated the assessment was important to determine the areas of the building that needed to be monitored to ensure the quality of the water. The Infection Preventionist stated she was not aware that the assessment had not been completed, despite infection control meetings that included the Maintenance Director, and stated the assessment should have been completed to determine areas where Legionella could grow in the building. The facility policy titled Water Management Program required an annual risk assessment to identify where Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread in the facility's water systems. The facility also failed to ensure staff adhered to Transmission Based Precautions for a resident with MSSA bacteremia. The resident was admitted with dependence on renal dialysis and had an Infectious Disease Physician note documenting end stage renal disease on intermittent dialysis and blood cultures positive for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Orders required contact precautions with all services provided in the room for six weeks, and the care plan included MSSA bacteremia and maintaining contact precautions. Observation showed a contact precaution sign and PPE cart outside the room, but no separate trash cans for used PPE or linens were present. An LPN entered the room and handed the resident paperwork without wearing PPE, and the LPN confirmed PPE should have been worn. The DON confirmed the appropriate trash cans were not present, and the IP confirmed staff should always wear full PPE when entering a contact isolation room and that separate trash cans should be present for disposal of PPE and dirty linens.
Failure to Timely Report Alleged Abuse Incidents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report alleged abuse violations within the required timeframe for five residents reviewed for abuse. A Facility Reported Incident documented an allegation of sexual abuse between two residents that occurred on 05/17/25 at 12:15 PM, but the report was not submitted to the State Agency until 05/18/25 at 10:50 PM, more than 34 hours later. Another allegation of abuse between the same two residents occurred on 07/02/25, and the FRI was not sent to the State Agency until 07/11/25, nine days later. During an interview, the Administrator stated the expectation was that abuse investigations should be turned into the state within two hours and confirmed these FRIs were not submitted within that timeframe. The report also documented an incident involving two other residents. A CNA observed one resident in another resident’s room with his right hand under the other resident’s shirt at 7:18 PM, and the facility did not report the abuse to the State Agency until 3:25 PM the next day. The Administrator confirmed the FRI should have initially been sent to the State Agency within two hours of discovery and acknowledged the report was sent the next day. The facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation stated that all alleged violations involving abuse must be reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made when the events involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury.
Failure to Provide Written Transfer and Bed Hold Notices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents and/or their resident representatives were provided written notices of transfer and bed hold notices for four of five residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The deficiency involved Residents 5, 8, 51, and 99, all of whom had hospital transfers documented in the record, but the survey found no documented evidence that the required written transfer notices or bed hold notices were given. The facility’s records and staff interviews showed that these notices were not available in the chart for the reviewed residents. Resident 5 was transferred to the Emergency Department after staff observed the resident acting outside of baseline, including extreme drowsiness, increased right-sided contractures, head leaning to the right, and inability to hold the head up. The resident’s representative was informed that the resident was being transferred, and EMS transported the resident with the face sheet, physician note, order summary, care plan, and e-interact transfer form. However, the Administrator stated she could not find the transfer form with the reason for transfer and appeal rights that were provided in writing, and also confirmed the bed hold notice in the admission packet did not specify the reserve bed payment per day. Resident 8, who had a BIMS score of 14 out of 15 and was cognitively intact, called 911 herself and requested transport to the ER. She stated that the facility never gave her paperwork related to the transfer or bed hold notice, and the DON could not find documentation for the transfer notice, bed hold, or hospital notification. Resident 51, also cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, was sent to the hospital after becoming hypotensive during dialysis and reporting nausea and lightheadedness; the resident later stated he did not know whether any paperwork was given. Resident 99, who had a BIMS score of 14 out of 15, was sent to the hospital after staff observed him slumped over in the day room with food falling from his mouth and he was difficult to arouse. The DON stated there was no documented evidence that Resident 99 or his representative received a written transfer notice or bed hold notice for the emergency transfer.
Dignified Dining Experience Not Maintained
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for two residents observed during meal service. One resident, who could feed herself, had her meal tray delivered to the dining room at 12:40 PM but was still waiting for tray set-up 23 minutes later, with the lids still on the food when observed at 1:03 PM. A CNA confirmed that the resident only needed tray set-up and that it should have been done when the tray was delivered. Another resident reported that the resident seated with her was served and then staff left to serve the hallway, causing the dining room residents to finish at different times and leaving her tray cold. A CNA stated that the meal service process was not right and described staff serving part of the dining room, then the hallway, and then returning to the dining room. The DM and RD both confirmed that residents in the dining room should be served at the same time and that tray set-up should occur when the meal is delivered.
Incomplete Investigation of Resident-to-Resident Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of a resident-to-resident abuse incident involving one resident out of nine residents reviewed for abuse. The resident involved had diagnoses including bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, delusional disorders, and convulsions. An EMR health status note documented the resident threatening another resident, throwing water on the resident, cursing at the resident, and using racial slurs, with staff present and intervening. Review of the Facility Reported Incident showed no evidence that other residents were asked whether they were afraid of any residents or had concerns about any residents in the facility. During interview, the Administrator, DOO, and SSD confirmed that residents were not asked if they felt safe or fearful of any resident. The facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation was reviewed.
Inaccurate PASARR Screening for Residents with Mental Health Diagnoses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure PASARR Level I screening was completed accurately before admission for two residents reviewed for PASARR. One resident was admitted with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, and the PASARR Level I screening dated 10/22/25 indicated the resident did not have a current serious mental illness and did not need a Level II referral. However, the resident's EMR, MDS, care plan, and order summary showed a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, psychotropic medication use, and orders for Zyprexa and Lamictal related to bipolar disorder. During interview, the SSD confirmed the PASARR Level I was not completed correctly because the bipolar diagnosis was not identified on the screen. A second resident was admitted with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, and the PASARR dated 07/25/22 indicated the resident met nursing facility criteria and could have a safe and appropriate plan of care developed, but also stated the resident did not have a current serious mental illness and did not meet the applicable criteria for serious MI, IDD, or related condition. The DON stated she could not locate a more updated PASARR screening form and acknowledged the document completed by the previous social worker was inaccurate. When asked whether it should have been corrected by submitting a new form, the DON stated it absolutely should have been redone.
Incomplete Assessment and Transfer Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct and document a thorough assessment for one resident with dementia with behavioral disturbance, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and diabetes. The resident’s admission MDS coded a BIMS score of 3 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognitive abilities for daily decision making. The record showed the resident required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, personal hygiene, and toileting, and was totally dependent for bathing. The last documented skin review noted no skin impairment, but a nurse practitioner progress note later documented warm, dry skin with a boggy left heel and a deep tissue injury, along with bilateral upper extremity strength of 5/5 and left foot drop. After the resident was found on the floor unresponsive and transferred to the emergency room, the transfer information under Section B - Key Clinical Information did not include an assessment of the resident’s condition, a rationale for the transfer, vital signs, or other pertinent information. It also stated the resident was not alert but did not define the resident’s baseline. The facility did not have a written protocol outlining a nurse’s interventions before transfer to another level of care. During interview, the DON stated the documentation did not meet facility expectations and was unacceptable, and that the change should have been documented first with a comprehensive assessment including blood pressure, heart rate, respirations, oxygen saturation, and blood sugar if diabetic, along with provider and family notification.
Failure to Provide Foot Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure one resident received foot care. Resident 77 was admitted with diagnoses including candidiasis of the skin and nail, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis. The care plan identified potential impairment to skin integrity related to fragile skin and directed weekly skin observations. The MDS showed the resident had a BIMS score of 15 out of 15 and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. During observation, Resident 77 was found in bed with both feet dry and covered with flaking skin. The resident stated his feet were dry and felt scratchy against the sheets and said, "I don't know why they don't lotion them." A weekly skin review dated 02/12/26 documented the skin as intact and not dry. Later observations again showed dry, flaking skin on both feet, and an LPN confirmed the condition and stated she would have the CNA wash the resident's feet and apply an emollient. A CNA also confirmed the resident had dry, flaking skin on his feet. The facility policy stated residents are to receive proper foot care to maintain mobility and good foot health, and that nursing assistants are to inspect skin during bathing and report concerns to the nurse immediately.
Failure to Escort Resident to Appointment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to monitor a resident for safety during a physician's appointment. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction, acute and chronic respiratory failure, and had a quarterly MDS showing a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, indicating cognitive intactness. The MDS also showed the resident used a wheelchair and had upper and lower extremity impairment. Daily nursing charting documented the resident as alert and oriented, with intact cognition, weak hand grasps, and limited range of motion on both sides. A progress note stated the resident went out to a GI appointment via wheelchair and returned later the same day via wheelchair. Family reported the resident was sent to the appointment without anyone to accompany him, and that a friend later found him sitting outside the office and not dressed appropriately for the cold weather. The ADON confirmed the resident went to the appointment alone and returned unharmed. Staff interviews revealed the facility expected family to be notified of appointments and asked to accompany the resident or arrange an escort if needed, but the facility did not have a policy on transportation to appointments, arranging escorts, appointments, or escorts.
Failure to Attempt Alternatives, Educate, and Obtain Consent for Side Rail Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure alternative measures were attempted before using bilateral side rails for one resident, failed to review the risks and benefits of side rail use with the resident or representative, and failed to obtain informed consent before the side rails were used. The resident, who was readmitted to the facility and had diagnoses including cerebral infarction, vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance, and acquired absence of the right leg above knee, had a BIMS score of 14 out of 15 on the quarterly MDS, indicating cognitive intactness. The care plan stated the resident used assist bars to maximize independence with turning and repositioning in bed, and the admission/re-admission screening documented bilateral half side rails for safety, but did not mention alternatives or any discussion of risks and benefits.
Medication Administration Errors Exceeded Allowed Rate
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to keep the medication error rate below 5 percent. During medication administration, 3 medication errors were identified for 3 residents out of 27 opportunities, resulting in an 11.11 percent medication error rate. The errors involved a resident with quadriplegia, dysphasia, and muscle contractures who had a G-tube and orders for hydralazine, metoclopramide, G-tube residual checks every shift, and G-tube placement checks every shift; a resident with congestive heart failure and hypertensive heart disease who had an order for carvedilol with instructions to hold if systolic blood pressure was less than 120; and a resident with type 2 DM who had an order for Humalog Kwikpen sliding scale insulin. For the resident with the G-tube, an RN administered medications through the tube after placing a syringe and water into the port, but did not check residual or tube placement before giving the medications. The RN stated she had checked the physician's order and said there were no orders for residual or placement checks, while the DON, UM, and ADON stated the nurses were expected to follow the physician's orders and check residual and placement before administering medications through the G-tube. For the resident receiving carvedilol, an LPN gave the medication without taking the resident's blood pressure first, despite the order to hold the medication if systolic blood pressure was less than 120. For the resident receiving insulin, an RN administered Humalog Kwikpen insulin without priming the pen after attaching the needle. The RN confirmed she did not prime the pen, and the DON and ADON stated the pen should have been primed to ensure the needle worked before administration.
Meal Substitution and Pureed Diet Not Followed
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident 23 received the meal posted on the menu and failed to ensure the resident’s meal was pureed as ordered. During lunch observation, the posted menu listed items including rosemary pork chop, shepherd’s pie, hot dog on bun, cheeseburger on bun, chicken tenders, grilled cheese sandwich, and sides such as baked sweet potato, French fries, peas and carrots, mixed vegetables, onion rings, and dinner roll. At the time of the meal, Resident 23’s tray card indicated a pureed diet with rosemary pork chop, mashed sweet potatoes, creamed spinach, dinner roll, and chocolate chip cookie cake, but the meal observed on the tray was a red sauce main entree, mashed potatoes with gravy, an unidentifiable tan vegetable, and pudding. During interview, the CNA assisting Resident 23 stated she thought the resident was served spaghetti with meat sauce, mashed potatoes, and gravy, and was unsure of the vegetable and dessert. The Dietary Manager confirmed the resident was actually served pureed spaghetti and meat sauce, fortified mashed potatoes with gravy, a chocolate muffin, and mixed vegetables, and stated she followed the substitutions list. She also stated she did not puree pasta because it becomes sticky and gummy once pureed. The Registered Dietician stated she was unaware the Dietary Manager was not pureeing the pasta and confirmed Resident 23 should have been served what was on the menu. Facility policy stated menus are to be prepared in advance, followed as posted, substitutions must have comparable nutritive value, and the dietician must review menus for nutritional adequacy.
Food Served at Improper Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure foods were served at palatable temperatures for three residents who received meals from the kitchen. Resident 8 reported that her meal tray was the first on the third cart but was always the last served and that it was always cold; she also stated that her pork chop was so tough the head nurse could not cut it with a fork and that everything was always overcooked. Resident 51 stated that the facility food tasted bad, that hot food was not hot and cold items such as milk were warm. Resident 77 reported that he did not eat much of the facility food because it did not smell good, that a grilled cheese sandwich he received was cold, and that he frequently ordered food from DoorDash because the facility food was cold and did not smell good. The registered dietician confirmed that hot food should be served hot, cold foods should be served cold, and food should not be overcooked and tough. During observation and interview, the dietary manager obtained temperatures on a meal test tray delivered last from the food cart and found cold pasta at 62 degrees Fahrenheit and juice at 62 degrees Fahrenheit.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 122 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 3 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Newport News
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riverside Lifelong H & R Warwick Forest | 1.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
| Newport News Nursing & Rehab | 2.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Regency Health And Rehabilitation Center | 2.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| York Post Acute | 3.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| The Chesapeake | 5 mi | ★★★★★ | 14 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Old Dominion Rehabilitation And Nursing.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.