Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Jamestown Health And Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident missed four doses of an IV antibiotic due to the facility's failure to have the medication in stock upon admission. The resident, with a complex medical history, also had to use personal Latanoprost eye drops for glaucoma as the facility did not provide them. Discrepancies in medication administration records and lack of staff awareness contributed to the deficiency.
A resident with a complex medical history missed four doses of prescribed IV antibiotics due to the facility's failure to ensure timely medication delivery and administration. The MAR showed discrepancies, with some doses incorrectly signed off as given. Additionally, the resident used personal eye drops due to a delay in receiving prescribed medication, contrary to facility policy.
A resident with health concerns related to caffeine consumption was not provided with decaf coffee and tea, despite his preferences and dietary needs. Upon admission, he was given a regular diet instead of a diabetic or heart-healthy diet, and his dietary preferences were not discussed with the dietary department. Observations showed that his meal trays contained caffeinated iced tea and water, and the baseline care plan lacked dietary orders and preferences.
A resident was not provided with a physician-ordered heart-healthy or diabetic diet upon admission, receiving a regular diet instead. The dietary department did not consult the resident about preferences or restrictions, leading to inappropriate dietary provisions, including caffeine, which the resident was not supposed to have. The baseline care plan lacked documentation of dietary orders, and the issue was later reported to the Administrator.
Failure to Provide Timely Medication to Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to a resident, resulting in the resident missing four consecutive doses of an IV antibiotic therapy. The resident, who was a new admission, reported that upon arrival, the facility did not have the necessary medications in stock, including the IV antibiotic and Latanoprost eye drops for glaucoma. The resident's clinical record indicated that the IV antibiotic was ordered on admission, but the medication administration record showed discrepancies, with some doses signed off as given despite the medication being unavailable. The resident's medical history included acute hematogenous osteomyelitis, type 2 diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease, asthma, glaucoma, congestive heart failure, hypertension, chronic atrial fibrillation, anemia, obstructive and reflux uropathy, gout, and a history of cerebrovascular accident. Despite these complex medical needs, the facility failed to provide the prescribed medications in a timely manner. The resident's family had to supply the Latanoprost eye drops from home due to the facility's inability to provide them. Interviews with facility staff, including the Director of Nursing and the Administrator, revealed a lack of awareness and documentation regarding the unavailability of medications. The facility's medication administration policy requires medications to be administered safely and timely, with any errors documented and reviewed. However, the facility did not adhere to these policies, leading to the resident missing critical doses of medication.
Medication Administration Errors in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician for two residents, leading to significant medication errors. For one resident, the staff did not administer four consecutive doses of prescribed intravenous antibiotics, Piperacillin Sodium Tazobactam, which were crucial for treating cellulitis. The medication administration record (MAR) showed discrepancies, with some doses signed off as given despite the medication being unavailable. Progress notes indicated that the pharmacy had not delivered the medication, and there were multiple attempts to contact the pharmacy to expedite the delivery. The resident in question had a complex medical history, including acute hematogenous osteomyelitis, type 2 diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease, asthma, glaucoma, congestive heart failure, hypertension, chronic atrial fibrillation, anemia, obstructive and reflux uropathy, gout, and a history of cerebrovascular accident. Despite the critical need for timely antibiotic administration, the facility's documentation and communication failures resulted in missed doses, with conflicting records about whether the medication was administered. Additionally, the facility allowed the resident to use personal eye drops for glaucoma due to a delay in receiving the prescribed medication from the pharmacy. This was against the facility's usual policy, and the Director of Nursing was unaware of this practice. The facility's medication administration policy emphasized the importance of administering medications safely, timely, and as prescribed, but these standards were not met in this instance.
Failure to Provide Decaf Beverages to Resident with Caffeine Restrictions
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to provide drinks consistent with the needs and preferences of a resident, specifically regarding the provision of decaf coffee and tea due to health concerns related to caffeine consumption. The resident, a new admission, reported that upon admission, he was supposed to have a diabetic or heart-healthy diet but was initially given a regular diet. He also mentioned that he was not supposed to have caffeine and preferred decaf coffee and tea. However, he was only provided with caffeinated iced tea and water, which he could not drink due to his health conditions. The resident stated that no one from the dietary department met with him during admission to discuss his preferences, allergies, and intolerances. Observations confirmed that the resident's meal trays contained caffeinated iced tea and water, and a review of the baseline care plan revealed that the dietary orders and preferences sections were left blank. An interview with a facility employee indicated that residents usually meet with a dietician to discuss diets, and decaf options are available upon request. However, the clinical record showed that the initial diet order was a regular diet, which was later changed to a consistent carbohydrates diet after the attending physician's review. The administrator was informed of these concerns during an end-of-day meeting, but no further information was provided.
Failure to Implement Physician-Ordered Therapeutic Diet
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to provide a therapeutic diet as ordered by the physician for a resident who was newly admitted. Upon admission, the resident was supposed to receive a heart-healthy or diabetic diet, but instead was given a regular diet until several days later. The resident, who has health conditions requiring a specific diet, reported not being consulted by the dietary department about his dietary preferences, allergies, or intolerances. This oversight resulted in the resident receiving caffeine, which he was not supposed to have due to his health conditions. A review of the clinical records showed that the baseline care plan did not have any dietary orders or preferences documented, and the dietary goals were left blank. The hospital discharge records indicated that the resident was on a heart-healthy diet prior to admission to the facility. The attending physician later changed the diet order to a Consistent Carbohydrates (CCD) diet with Dysphagia Advanced texture, but this was not implemented upon admission. The issue was brought to the attention of the facility's Administrator, but no further information was provided at the time.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 77 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Williamsburg
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Woodhaven Hall At Williamsburg Landing | 2 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 1 |
| Riverside Lifelong Health & Rehabilitation Patri | 2.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Williamsburg Post Acute & Rehabilitation | 3.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Windsormeade Of Williamsburg | 6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Old Dominion Rehabilitation And Nursing | 15.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 22 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Jamestown Health And Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.