Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Chase City Health And Rehab Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to provide written notification of room changes to two residents and their representatives, as required by policy. One resident's room change was due to roommate incompatibility, but there was no documentation or written notice. For the second resident, the spouse was informed verbally, but no written notice or reason for the change was documented. The social worker acknowledged the lack of written notices, as the facility was transitioning to a new communication form.
A facility failed to accurately code a resident's behavior in the MDS assessment. The resident was observed playing in feces, and despite documentation in progress notes, the behavior was not coded in the MDS. The care plan coordinator confirmed the oversight, acknowledging that the behavior should have been coded under section E200C. The facility's policy did not address assessment accuracy, and the administrator and DON were informed of the findings.
The facility staff failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records for a resident, including incomplete medication administration records, lack of detailed documentation for a skin condition, and inaccurate reporting of a watery discharge. Interviews with staff and the DON confirmed these deficiencies.
The facility staff failed to administer medications as ordered and did not notify the provider when medications were missed for a resident. The resident did not receive Glimepiride and Protonix because they were sleeping, and Bactrim was not given without proper documentation or notification. Interviews confirmed that the provider should have been notified, but this was not done.
Failure to Provide Written Notification of Room Changes
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to notify two residents and/or their representatives in writing about room changes, as required by facility policy. For one resident, there was no documentation in the clinical record regarding the reason for the room change or evidence that the resident and family were informed. The facility administrator and director of nursing acknowledged the lack of documentation and noted that the room change was due to roommate incompatibility, as recorded in their daily stand-up meeting notes. For the second resident, although a nursing progress note indicated that the spouse was aware of the room change, there was no written notification provided, nor was the reason for the room change documented in the clinical record. The facility's social worker admitted that she did not always document the reasons for room changes and had not been issuing written notices, as the facility was in the process of implementing a new form for such communication. The facility policy mandates that residents and their representatives receive advance notice and a copy of the room change progress note, which was not adhered to in these cases.
Failure to Accurately Code Resident Behavior in MDS Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a resident, identified as Resident #2 (R2), in a survey sample of three residents. The deficiency was identified during a closed record review of R2's chart, which revealed a behavior progress note dated April 29, 2024, indicating that the resident was observed playing in feces. Additionally, a nurse practitioner's progress note from April 30, 2024, stated that the resident did not answer questions appropriately and seemed confused, with staff reporting similar behavior. Despite these documented behaviors, the MDS assessment with an assessment reference date of April 29, 2024, did not code any behaviors for R2. During an interview with the care plan coordinator, who completed R2's MDS assessment, it was confirmed that behaviors have a seven-day look-back period and should be documented based on CNA and nursing notes. The care plan coordinator acknowledged that playing in feces is a behavior that should have been coded under section E200C of the MDS. Upon reviewing R2's admission MDS, the care plan coordinator confirmed that the behavior was not coded and should have been. The facility's policy on the comprehensive care planning process did not address the accuracy of assessments, and the facility follows the RAI manual for coding instructions. The facility administrator and director of nursing were informed of these findings, but no additional information was provided.
Incomplete and Inaccurate Clinical Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one resident (R2) in a survey sample of five residents. Specifically, on 3/9/24, the medication administration record (MAR) for R2 was incomplete, with blank entries for Glimepiride, Protonix, and Bactrim. There were no progress notes indicating that the medications were not administered or that the physician had been notified. Interviews with LPN #1 and LPN #2 confirmed that blank entries on the MAR indicate medications were not given and that the protocol requires notifying the provider and the family. The DON later reported that RN #2 had administered the medications but failed to document it, leading to a disciplinary action for RN #2. Additionally, on 3/11/24, a nursing progress note indicated that R2 had an open area on the scrotum with Calazinc applied, and the nurse practitioner was notified. However, there was no clinical assessment or description of the area documented, lacking details such as size, depth, signs of infection, or pain. The DON confirmed that the documentation was incomplete and provided evidence of a physician order for Calazinc cream obtained on 2/29/24. Furthermore, on 3/11/24, a nursing progress note mentioned a watery discharge from R2's buttock, but there were no additional details to indicate the source of the discharge. The DON later clarified that the discharge was from R2's rectum, not the buttock, and confirmed that the documentation was not complete. The facility policy requires accurate, relevant, and complete documentation, which was not adhered to in these instances.
Failure to Administer Medications and Notify Provider
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to administer medications in accordance with physician orders and did not notify the ordering provider when medications were not administered for one resident (R2). On 3/11/24, R2 was not given two medications, Glimepiride and Protonix, at the scheduled time of 6:30 a.m. The reason documented was that the resident was sleeping. Additionally, the hospital discharge summary recommended crushing medications due to aspiration concerns, but this order was not carried out upon R2's readmission to the facility. On 3/9/24, R2 also did not receive the Bactrim antibiotic as ordered, with the MAR indicating 'other/see nurse notes' without further explanation. The nurse's note simply stated 'medication not given' without additional details. Interviews with LPNs confirmed that medications not given should be documented and the provider notified, which was not done in this case. The DON confirmed that the documentation did not support that the doctor was informed about the missed medications. The facility's policy on medication administration states that medications should be administered by authorized and trained persons in accordance with laws and standards of practice. The Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice also notes that failure to implement a physician's order properly or in a timely fashion, and failure to report and administer omitted doses appropriately, are common legal claims for departure from standards of care. The survey team shared these concerns with the facility's administration, but no additional information was provided to address the deficiencies noted.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the citations issued around you in the last 12 months — including the immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Chase City
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clarksville Health & Rehab Center | 13.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Twin Lakes Rehabilitation And Nursing | 18.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Wayland Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 18.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| South Boston Health & Rehab Center | 25.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 1 |
| Berry Hill Nursing Home | 26.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Chase City Health And Rehab Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.