Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around September 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Monument Healthcare South Salt Lake during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to prevent accident hazards and provide adequate supervision, including allowing excessively hot water in resident rooms, unsupervised smoking by residents who required supervision, and incidents of residents with cognitive impairment eloping from the facility undetected. Staff interviews revealed confusion about supervision policies, and additional hazards such as a non-working front doorbell and unsafe storage in resident areas were observed.
A resident with a mental disorder, psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or a history of trauma and/or PTSD did not receive the necessary treatment and services to address their mental health and psychosocial needs.
The facility did not consistently calibrate glucometers according to manufacturer instructions, with calibration logs showing irregular entries and some logs missing. Interviews with nursing staff revealed confusion about calibration procedures and documentation, and not all staff were authorized or trained to perform blood sugar checks. This resulted in laboratory services not meeting resident needs.
Residents were served beverages in Styrofoam cups and prepackaged juice containers during meal service, with some food items also provided in disposable containers. Staff used these items due to a shortage of regular cups, as explained by the Dietary Manager. These actions did not support the maintenance or enhancement of residents' dignity and quality of life.
Three residents experienced incidents involving elopement and alleged abuse that were not reported to the State Survey Agency or Adult Protective Services within the required timeframe. In one case, a resident with dementia eloped and was returned by a CNA, but APS was not notified. Another resident with cognitive impairment left with a friend and did not return, with no evidence of required notifications. A third resident alleged inappropriate touching by a CNA, but the allegation was not promptly reported or investigated.
Surveyors found that expired eye drops and insulin, as well as multiple opened eye drop bottles without open dates, were present in medication carts and administered to residents. Staff, including RNs and LPNs, acknowledged that medications should be labeled with open dates and discarded after 28 days, but this was not consistently done, resulting in expired or improperly labeled drugs being used.
Surveyors identified multiple deficiencies in food storage, preparation, and sanitation, including soiled kitchen surfaces and equipment, improper sanitizer solution levels, open spices, and a broken steamer. A Registered Dietitian was also observed in the food prep area without a hairnet, and cleaning routines were found inadequate to maintain professional standards.
The facility did not ensure effective policies were in place to correct identified deficiencies, resulting in unsafe hot water temperatures in resident rooms, unsupervised smoking by residents who required supervision, and incidents of resident elopement. Despite previous QAPI plans, the facility failed to maintain updated supervision lists, assess residents for smoking safety, or consistently implement interventions for elopement risks. Repeat deficiencies from a prior survey were also cited again.
The facility did not ensure that two residents or their representatives were informed and able to participate in care decisions, including starting an antidepressant and placing a wanderguard device, as both interventions were initiated before obtaining proper consent.
Two residents were discharged or left the facility without receiving written notification of discharge and the reasons for transfer in a language and manner they understood, and the Office of the State LTC Ombudsman was not notified as required. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent practices regarding notification and documentation for residents discharged to hospitals or who left against medical advice.
A resident with a documented history of depression and ongoing treatment with escitalopram did not have this diagnosis reflected in their medical record or MDS assessment. Multiple staff members were unaware of the depression diagnosis, and the DON confirmed it was not updated in the chart, leading to an inaccurate assessment.
A resident lost the ability to perform ADLs without a documented medical reason. The facility did not ensure that the decline in the resident's functional abilities was clinically unavoidable, as required by regulations.
A resident did not receive care and treatment in accordance with physician orders and their stated preferences and goals, as observed and documented by surveyors.
Two residents were not provided with the therapeutic diets ordered for their medical conditions. One resident with diabetes received high-carbohydrate meals instead of a carbohydrate-controlled diet, while another with end stage renal disease was served high-potassium foods despite a renal diet order. Dietary staff and the RD were unaware of the residents' specific needs and preferences, and the meal planning system did not consistently ensure compliance with diet orders.
A resident with complex psychiatric and medical conditions did not receive scheduled Invega IM injections on multiple occasions because the medication was not available at the facility, with missed doses attributed to delivery delays and insurance coverage issues. Documentation confirmed the missed administrations, and in one instance, no reason was documented for the omission.
Two residents did not receive timely outside professional services as required. One resident, needing dental care for decay causing injury, had no documented appointment or refusal for outside dental treatment. Another resident with uncontrolled diabetes had multiple referrals for endocrinology, but there were delays and unclear follow-through in scheduling the specialist appointment. Staff interviews revealed confusion and lack of documentation regarding responsibility and process for arranging these services.
Two residents' medical records were found to be incomplete and not systematically organized. One resident's record lacked an updated PASRR reflecting a new depression diagnosis, despite documentation of depression and related treatment in progress notes. Another resident's record did not contain any documentation of a reported elopement event, contrary to facility policy requiring such incidents to be recorded.
Staff did not consistently use Enhanced Barrier Precautions, such as wearing gowns, when providing care to a resident with chronic wounds and a feeding tube. The resident's tube feed was also left uncapped when disconnected, contrary to facility protocols. Interviews indicated staff were unclear about EBP requirements, and observations confirmed lapses in infection control practices.
The facility failed to protect residents from all forms of abuse and neglect, including physical, mental, and sexual abuse, as well as physical punishment, by any individual.
Multiple Failures in Accident Prevention, Supervision, and Elopement Safeguards
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified multiple deficiencies related to accident hazards and inadequate supervision throughout the facility. Hot water temperatures in resident rooms were found to be excessively high, ranging from 121.7 to 145.5 degrees Fahrenheit, well above the safe range of 105-115 degrees as stated by the Maintenance Director. Residents with varying degrees of cognitive impairment and physical limitations were exposed to these hazardous water temperatures, with some residents reporting the water was hot enough to make noodles. The facility's water temperature logs over the previous six months did not reflect these high temperatures, instead showing much lower readings, and discrepancies were noted between the surveyors' thermometers and the facility's infrared thermometer during testing. In addition to the water temperature issue, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for residents who required it while smoking. Several residents who were assessed as needing supervision were observed smoking unsupervised in various locations, including outside the facility and near the sidewalk. Some residents kept their own smoking materials despite care plans and evaluations indicating that these should be stored by staff and only used under supervision. There were inconsistencies in the facility's smoking policy implementation, with staff interviews revealing confusion about which residents required supervision and how smoking materials were managed. One resident was not properly evaluated for smoking, and the list of supervised smokers was outdated. The facility also failed to prevent elopement for residents assessed as being at risk. Two residents with significant cognitive impairment and histories of wandering were able to leave the facility without staff knowledge. In one case, a resident was found walking two blocks away and returned by a CNA, while another resident was found by police after leaving the facility and becoming combative. The facility's elopement prevention measures, such as wander guards, were not effective in preventing these incidents, and staff were unsure how a resident was able to exit the building while wearing a wander guard. Additional hazards were noted, such as a non-functioning front doorbell that left residents locked outside and unable to alert staff, and the storage of metal bed frames and boxes in a dayroom occupied by residents.
Failure to Provide Appropriate Mental Health and Psychosocial Services
Penalty
Summary
A resident who displayed or was diagnosed with a mental disorder, psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or had a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder did not receive the appropriate treatment and services as required. The facility failed to ensure that the necessary care and interventions were provided to address the resident's mental health and psychosocial needs, as observed and documented by surveyors.
Failure to Consistently Calibrate Glucometers per Manufacturer Guidelines
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents, specifically regarding the calibration and quality control of glucometers. Review of calibration logs for various hallways revealed inconsistent and infrequent calibration dates, with some logs missing or not readily available on medication carts. Interviews with nursing staff, including LPNs, RNs, and CMAs, indicated a lack of consistent understanding and adherence to the manufacturer's instructions for glucometer calibration. Some staff believed calibration was performed weekly by the night shift, while others were unsure of the frequency or location of calibration logs. The Director of Nursing confirmed that not all staff were authorized to perform blood sugar checks, as some had not been properly trained or passed off. Further interviews with the Regional Nurse Consultant and review of the glucometer manual confirmed that calibration and control solution testing should be performed weekly and under specific circumstances, such as when using a new bottle of test strips or if the accuracy of the meter was in question. However, the facility was not consistently following these requirements, as evidenced by the irregular calibration dates and staff uncertainty. This failure to adhere to manufacturer guidelines for glucometer calibration resulted in the facility not meeting the laboratory service needs of its residents.
Use of Disposable Cups and Containers During Meal Service
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that residents dining in the facility's dining room were served beverages in Styrofoam cups and prepackaged juice cups, rather than in standard dining ware. During multiple meal services, staff distributed milk and water in Styrofoam cups, while juices were provided in small cartons or foil-covered cups. Coffee and tea were served in coffee cups, and some food items, such as strawberries, were served in disposable containers. One resident was observed with multiple beverage containers, including cartons and Styrofoam cups, at their dining table. The Dietary Manager explained that the use of Styrofoam cups was due to a shortage of regular cups, as several had gone missing and replacements had not yet arrived. The facility had some regular cups available, but not enough for all residents. These practices did not promote an environment that maintained or enhanced residents' quality of life or recognized their individuality, as required by regulations regarding dignity and respect in resident care.
Failure to Timely Report Alleged Abuse, Neglect, and Elopement
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or elopement were reported immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation was made, to the State Survey Agency (SSA) and Adult Protective Services (APS) for three residents. In the first case, a resident with a history of traumatic brain injury and dementia eloped from the facility and was found by a community member. The CNA who located the resident notified the Director of Nursing (DON) of the elopement, but there was no documentation that APS was notified as required. In the second case, a resident with paranoid schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and moderate cognitive impairment left the facility with a friend and did not return as expected. The facility made attempts to contact the resident but did not notify law enforcement, APS, or the Ombudsman about the resident's absence. The resident eventually returned to collect belongings and stated he would not be returning, but there was no evidence that the required notifications were made regarding his prolonged absence or potential elopement. In the third case, a resident with Parkinson's disease, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, and other chronic conditions alleged that a CNA had inserted her fingers into the resident's private parts during care. The resident reported the incident to the CNA Coordinator, who did not recall the name of the CNA involved and did not initiate an investigation or report the allegation to the DON or administrator in a timely manner. The CNA Coordinator stated she discussed the situation with the DON, but there was no documentation that the incident was reported to the SSA or APS within the required timeframe. The administrator later acknowledged that the incident was not recognized as an abuse allegation until much later, resulting in a failure to report as required.
Expired and Unlabeled Medications Found in Use
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified that the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored according to professional standards for four residents. Specifically, expired medications were found in use, including Ketotifen Fumarate eye drops administered to a resident after the labeled open date had passed, and an insulin pen that was past its expiration date. Additionally, several eye drop bottles, both prescription and over-the-counter, were found without open dates, making it impossible to determine if they were still safe for use. Staff interviews confirmed that medications such as eye drops and insulin are expected to be discarded after a set period post-opening, but this protocol was not consistently followed. The observations included a nurse administering expired eye drops, multiple medication carts containing opened eye drops and insulin pens without proper labeling, and staff acknowledging the lack of required open dates or the presence of expired medications. Medication administration records confirmed that these medications were actively being given to residents. The Director of Nursing and other staff stated that all opened eye drops and insulin should be discarded after 28 days, but this was not adhered to, resulting in the use and storage of expired or improperly labeled medications.
Deficient Food Storage, Preparation, and Sanitation Practices Identified
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed multiple deficiencies in food storage, preparation, and sanitation practices within the facility's kitchen. During initial and follow-up tours, areas behind and under kitchen equipment such as the steamer, storage shelves, and carts were found to be soiled with substances including white splatter, debris, grease, and a black substance. The table supporting the steamer was rusty and also had visible splatter. The floor under preparation sinks and storage areas was similarly soiled, and tape was found on the ceiling above a preparation sink. Large bins containing powdered milk, sugar, flour, and oatmeal were soiled around the tops, and spices were left open to air. Plastic drawers containing serving utensils were also found to be soiled. Sanitizer solution used in the kitchen did not meet professional standards, as test strips failed to register the required parts per million (PPM) for quaternary ammonium sanitizer, with the color on the strip not matching the required range. The Dietary Manager confirmed the sanitizer was recently changed but was unable to verify the correct concentration. Additionally, a Registered Dietitian was observed in the food preparation area without a hairnet. The facility's steamer, used for cooking vegetables, pork ribs, and mashed potatoes, had been broken for about a year, requiring staff to boil foods instead, which was reported to be less effective. Cleaning routines for various kitchen areas and equipment were described by the Dietary Manager, but observations indicated that these routines were not sufficient to maintain required sanitation standards.
Failure to Correct Hazards and Supervision Deficiencies Through QAPI
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to establish and implement effective policies to correct identified deficiencies, as evidenced by repeated areas of non-compliance and failure to detect or address immediate jeopardy situations through the QAPI process. Specifically, for 12 out of 61 sampled residents, the environment was not maintained free of accident hazards, and residents did not consistently receive adequate supervision or assistive devices to prevent accidents. Hot water temperatures in resident rooms were observed to range from 121.7 to 145.5 degrees Fahrenheit, significantly exceeding safe limits. However, facility water temperature logs for the same period recorded much lower temperatures, indicating a lack of accurate monitoring or reporting. Additionally, residents assessed as requiring supervision while smoking were observed smoking unsupervised, and some residents were not evaluated for smoking safety at all. There were also incidents of residents with a history of wandering eloping from the facility without staff awareness. Despite previous QAPI plans addressing supervised smoking and elopement risks, the facility did not maintain updated lists of residents requiring supervision, failed to assess residents for smoking safety, and did not ensure interventions for elopement risks were consistently in place. Repeat deficiencies from a prior survey were cited again, including those related to accident hazards, resident rights, medication management, and infection control. The Administrator confirmed that QAPI meetings were held monthly and that action plans had been created for some issues, but hot water concerns had not been identified or addressed through the QAPI process.
Failure to Inform and Obtain Consent for Medication and Wanderguard Placement
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that two residents or their representatives were fully informed and able to participate in decisions regarding their care and treatment. For one resident with severe vascular dementia and significant cognitive impairment, the facility initiated an antidepressant medication (Escitalopram) without notifying or obtaining consent from the resident's representative prior to starting the medication. Record review and interviews confirmed that no documentation of consent or notification was found before the medication was administered. In another case, a resident who had recently eloped from the facility was fitted with a wanderguard device upon return. Documentation showed that the wanderguard was placed before obtaining informed consent from the resident or her guardian. The consent form and related progress note were completed two days after the device was applied, and staff interviews confirmed that consent should have been obtained prior to placement. These actions demonstrate a failure to inform and involve residents or their representatives in advance of significant care interventions.
Failure to Notify Ombudsman and Provide Written Discharge Notices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide required written notification of discharge and the reasons for transfer in a language and manner understandable to the resident, and did not send a copy of the discharge notice to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for two residents. For one resident with diagnoses including type 1 diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal disease, multiple hospital transfers were documented in the medical record. However, the Admissions Marketing Director (AMD) stated that the Ombudsman was only notified monthly of residents discharged against medical advice (AMA) or to the community, and not when residents were transferred to a hospital. The Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) confirmed that the Ombudsman should be notified of all discharges, including hospital transfers, but this was not done for this resident. Another resident with a history of paranoid schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and other medical conditions left the facility with a friend and did not return. The resident later came back to collect belongings and stated he would not return. The Administrator acknowledged that no AMA form or discharge instructions were provided because the resident was in a rush, and the Ombudsman was not notified of the resident's departure. The AMD considered the situation as leaving AMA, but did not follow the required notification procedures. Interviews with facility staff, including the Administrator, AMD, RNC, and Director of Nursing (DON), revealed inconsistent practices regarding notification of the Ombudsman and provision of discharge documentation. Staff described procedures for contacting residents or families and involving law enforcement if a resident did not return from a leave of absence, but did not consistently notify the Ombudsman or provide written discharge notices as required.
Failure to Accurately Document Depression Diagnosis in Resident Assessment
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when the facility failed to ensure that a resident's assessment accurately reflected their current medical status. The resident in question had a documented history of severe vascular dementia, hypertension, attention and concentration deficit following cerebral infarction, depression, and cognitive communication deficit. Multiple psychiatric and nursing notes, as well as physician orders, indicated that the resident was being treated for depression with escitalopram (Lexapro), and the diagnosis of depression was referenced in several clinical documents. Despite this, the resident's medical diagnoses list and the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) did not include depression as a diagnosis. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of awareness and documentation regarding the resident's depression diagnosis. Registered nurses and the social service worker were either unsure or unaware of the depression diagnosis, and the face sheet did not reflect it. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the resident had been diagnosed with depression, but this information was not updated in the medical chart or the MDS, resulting in an inaccurate assessment of the resident's condition.
Failure to Prevent Unnecessary Decline in ADL Abilities
Penalty
Summary
Residents experienced a loss in their ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) without a documented medical reason. The facility failed to ensure that residents maintained their highest practicable level of functioning in ADLs, as required, unless a decline was clinically unavoidable due to a medical condition. This deficiency was identified through surveyor observation and review of resident records, which did not provide evidence of a medical justification for the decline in ADL performance.
Failure to Follow Treatment Orders and Resident Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and care according to physician orders, as well as the resident's preferences and goals. This deficiency was identified through surveyor observation and review of records, which showed that care provided did not align with the documented orders or the expressed wishes and care goals of the resident involved.
Failure to Provide Ordered Therapeutic Diets to Residents
Penalty
Summary
Two residents were not provided with the therapeutic diets ordered for their medical conditions. One resident with type 1 diabetes, who was on a carbohydrate-controlled diet, consistently received high-carbohydrate meals and was not offered low-carbohydrate options as requested by the resident and family. The resident experienced high blood glucose readings, and the family expressed concern that insulin was administered without regard to the carbohydrate content of meals. Observations confirmed that the resident was served meals inconsistent with the prescribed diet, such as being given bread pudding instead of fruit, and the dietary manager was unable to specify the carbohydrate content of meals provided. Another resident, with end stage renal disease, diabetes, and gastroparesis, reported not receiving a renal diet as ordered by the physician. The resident stated that meals included high-potassium foods such as beans and bananas, which are not appropriate for a renal diet. The resident had communicated these concerns to dietary staff without resolution. Review of dietary records and interviews with the dietary manager and registered dietitian revealed a lack of awareness and oversight regarding the specific dietary needs and preferences of these residents, and the computer system used for meal planning did not consistently ensure compliance with therapeutic diet orders.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Invega Injections Due to Medication Unavailability
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with multiple psychiatric and medical diagnoses, including severe dementia with agitation, paranoid schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder, did not receive scheduled doses of Invega intramuscular injections as ordered. On several occasions, the medication was not available at the facility when it was due to be administered. Specifically, on one occasion, the injection was not given because it had not arrived at the facility, and on another, the medication was unavailable due to issues with insurance coverage. Documentation in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and nurse notes confirmed these missed doses, with one instance lacking a documented reason for non-administration. The resident's medication orders for Invega were adjusted multiple times, including changes in dosage and administration schedule, in an effort to accommodate insurance requirements. Despite these adjustments, there were repeated failures to provide the medication as scheduled, resulting in missed doses. The facility's process for ordering and ensuring the timely availability of the medication was insufficient, as evidenced by the need to call the pharmacy to reorder the medication and the subsequent delay in administration.
Failure to Arrange Timely Outside Professional Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to arrange for timely outside professional services for two residents who required them. One resident, with multiple diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, schizoaffective disorder, and dementia, was identified as needing dental care after an in-room dental exam revealed decay causing injury to her lip and a need for fillings. Despite a care plan intervention to coordinate dental care and transportation, there was no documentation that an outside dental appointment was scheduled or that the resident refused or canceled such appointments. Interviews with nursing staff and the former unit manager revealed confusion about who was responsible for scheduling and documenting these appointments, and a lack of clarity regarding insurance coverage and the current process for arranging outside services. Another resident, with diagnoses including hemiplegia, chronic respiratory failure, morbid obesity, major depressive disorder, type 1 diabetes, and epilepsy, was referred multiple times to an endocrinologist due to poorly controlled diabetes, as evidenced by elevated Hemoglobin A1c levels. Although the need for an endocrinology referral was documented in several provider notes and discussed in an interdisciplinary team meeting, there was a significant delay in arranging the appointment. The resident's family specifically requested a preferred endocrinologist, and while a referral was eventually made and an assessment conducted, staff interviews indicated uncertainty about when or if previous referrals were acted upon, and the responsible unit manager was unavailable for clarification. In both cases, the facility did not ensure that required outside professional services were arranged in a timely manner, as evidenced by the lack of documentation and follow-through on referrals and appointments. The deficiencies were identified through interviews with residents, staff, and review of medical records, which showed gaps in the process for coordinating and documenting outside care.
Incomplete and Disorganized Medical Records for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain complete, accurate, and systematically organized medical records for two residents. For one resident with severe vascular dementia, hypertension, and depression, the medical record did not contain an updated Pre-admission Screening/Resident Review (PASRR) reflecting a new diagnosis of depression, despite multiple psychiatric and nursing notes indicating the presence of depression and the initiation of antidepressant therapy. Interviews with staff confirmed that the PASRR was not updated in the medical chart when the new diagnosis was made, and the updated PASRR was not initially available in the resident's record. For another resident with a history of atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, bipolar disorder, and muscle weakness, there was no documentation in the medical record regarding an elopement event that had been reported by the facility. The Regional Nurse Consultant confirmed that any change of condition, such as an elopement, should be documented in the progress notes, but no such documentation was found in the resident's file.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions and Maintain Tube Feed Sanitation
Penalty
Summary
Staff failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with chronic wounds and a feeding tube. Multiple observations showed that staff, including registered nurses and certified nursing assistants, did not wear gowns while providing direct care such as changing bed linens and briefs, or when reconnecting the resident's tube feed. The resident reported that staff wore gloves but not gowns during care. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent knowledge about the requirement to use gowns as part of EBP for residents with tube feeds and chronic wounds. Additionally, the resident's tube feed was observed to be disconnected and left uncapped, exposing the end of the tube to air. Both nursing staff and the regional nurse consultant confirmed that the tube should be capped when not in use to prevent contamination. The facility had a system in place to identify residents requiring EBP and provided gowns and masks outside the resident's room, but these precautions were not consistently followed by staff during care activities.
Failure to Protect Residents from Abuse and Neglect
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified regarding the facility's failure to protect each resident from all types of abuse, including physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by any individual. The report notes that residents were not adequately safeguarded from these forms of mistreatment, indicating lapses in the facility's responsibility to ensure resident safety and well-being. No specific details about the actions, inactions, or events leading to the deficiency, nor information about the residents involved or their medical conditions at the time, are provided in the report.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 154 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 3 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Salt Lake City
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meadow Brook Rehabilitation And Nursing | 0.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 14 | 0 |
| St Joseph Villa | 0.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Little Cottonwood Rehabilitation And Nursing | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Millcreek Rehabilitation And Nursing | 1.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Monument Healthcare Murray Creek | 2.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Monument Healthcare South Salt Lake.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.