Citations in Utah
Comprehensive analysis of citations, statistics, and compliance trends for long-term care facilities in Utah.
Statistics for Utah (Last 12 Months)
Financial Impact (Last 12 Months)
Latest Citations in Utah
A resident with Parkinson’s Disease was being transferred from bed to a chair using a mechanical (Hoyer) lift operated by two CNAs when a sling strap snapped, causing the resident to fall and strike the back of the head. The resident sustained an abrasion, a 1 cm scalp laceration with bleeding, and severe back pain rated 9/10, and was sent to the hospital for evaluation. Manufacturer instructions required staff to inspect slings and straps for wear before each use, but there was no evidence the specific sling used in this transfer had been inspected for integrity, and the Administrator acknowledged that the strap breakage led to the resident’s fall and injury.
The facility failed to timely report alleged abuse to SSA and APS after staff twice observed a resident with dementia and acute systolic CHF receiving zealous, open-mouthed kisses on the mouth from her brother. On two separate occasions, a CNA and an LPN witnessed or were informed of these unusual kissing interactions, which they later described as awkward and not typical of a sibling relationship. Despite this, the nursing staff did not immediately report the incidents as potential abuse to the Administrator, and the allegation was not brought forward until a staff meeting days later, resulting in the required notifications to external authorities not being made within the mandated 2-hour timeframe.
A resident with muscle weakness, gait abnormalities, atrial fibrillation, and on a blood thinner sustained an unwitnessed bathroom fall, reported hitting her head, and developed rapidly worsening right facial swelling and a swollen‑shut eye that prevented pupillary assessment. Initial vitals and neuro checks were performed, oxygen was applied, and x‑rays were ordered, but despite the significant change in condition and the resident’s anticoagulation status, the provider was not notified of the worsening condition at the time it occurred and the resident was not sent to the hospital until the next day when an NP assessed her and ordered transfer. In the ED, the physician documented that no evaluation for the injuries had occurred the prior evening and CT imaging showed traumatic subdural and subarachnoid hemorrhages and a large facial hematoma, demonstrating that the facility failed to provide timely, standard‑of‑care treatment and hospital transfer after the fall and subsequent change in condition.
A resident with cognitive impairment, neurological conditions, and substance-related diagnoses was assessed as being at risk for elopement and documented as having poor safety awareness, poor judgment, and wandering behavior requiring frequent redirection. Nursing staff observed the resident wandering in the hall and behind the nurse’s station and communicated during shift report that a WanderGuard was recommended, but no device was applied because staff did not know where to obtain one. The resident later left the building through the front door, was not immediately detected as missing, and was ultimately found by a medication technician about a mile away walking on a sidewalk near a restaurant, demonstrating a failure to provide adequate supervision and timely elopement interventions.
A nurse failed to follow professional standards for medication administration by not properly identifying a resident before giving medications, resulting in the administration of Lorazepam and Carvedilol that were intended for another resident. The error was discovered and documented, with monitoring showing the resident remained stable and without distress, and the hospice nurse, NP, and family were notified. Leadership, including the DON and administrators, acknowledged that the failure to correctly verify the resident’s identity led to the wrong medications being administered.
A resident with multiple comorbidities and an above-knee amputation requested that staff heat prepackaged ramen soup in a microwave at the nutrition station; staff followed package directions and returned the hot soup, which the resident, who used a motorized wheelchair and insisted on carrying items independently, then spilled while turning, causing a third-degree burn to the palmar side of the left wrist. Staff interviews showed that, before this incident, CNAs and an LPN heated food based on package instructions and judged safety by touch without thermometers, and the DON confirmed that no thermometers were available and that staff relied on touch to determine if food was safe to serve.
The facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff with appropriate skills to respond promptly to call lights and assist residents with toileting, resulting in multiple residents experiencing incontinence and being left unattended on the toilet. Several residents with significant mobility and medical issues reported waiting long periods, including up to 30–45 minutes or more, for call lights to be answered, particularly during evenings, nights, shift changes, and weekends. Surveyors directly observed call lights sounding for 8–13 minutes before staff responded. Staff reported that CNA hours had been cut after a change in ownership, many staff had quit, and they were unable to complete all care tasks due to understaffing. Grievances and resident council notes over several months documented repeated complaints about slow call light response times, residents being left on the toilet for extended periods, and delays in getting to meals, while leadership acknowledged staffing was based on census rather than acuity despite the written facility assessment describing an acuity-based approach.
Multiple residents and a family member reported that meals were bland, unappetizing, sometimes raw or over-roasted, difficult to chew, and often cold by the time they reached residents’ rooms, with no consistent offer of alternatives when food was disliked. Resident council minutes and grievances documented concerns about cold meals, limited variety, lack of fruit, and meals perceived as too high in carbohydrates. A test tray showed hot items, including chicken tenders and tater tots, were served at low temperatures, with mushy, cold textures and dry, tough meat, and there was no plate warmer used while CNAs, rather than dietary staff, passed trays on the halls after a change in kitchen operations.
Two residents on modified diets for dementia and chewing/swallowing concerns were given snacks that did not match their ordered textures. One resident on a pureed diet, ordered after staff observed food being held in the mouth and poor chewing, was repeatedly provided ham sandwiches, potato chips, and an ice cream cone. Another resident on a minced & moist Level 5 diet with cut‑up foods was served a peanut cluster and later offered a crunchy “bird’s nest” snack with chow mein noodles and candy. Staff interviews revealed that activities staff supplied their own snacks without verifying diet orders, that the ST had not been consulted for a swallow evaluation in at least one case, and that nursing and dietary staff expected physician diet orders to be followed.
A resident with a right humerus fracture, chronic right arm pain, dementia (BIMS 9), and impaired use of one upper extremity required setup/clean-up assistance with eating, including cut food and opened containers, as reflected in the MDS and care plan. Despite this, surveyors observed multiple meals where the resident’s food was not consistently cut into bite-sized pieces and containers (such as lidded bowls, syrup packets, and juice boxes) were left unopened, leading family members to cut food on at least one occasion. The diet order and meal card lacked instructions for cut-up food or setup assistance, and interviews with CNAs, the DM, the MDS coordinator, and an RN confirmed that the resident needed this help but that it was not incorporated into formal orders or consistently implemented.
Failure to Inspect Mechanical Lift Sling Results in Resident Fall and Injury
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involved the facility’s failure to ensure a resident’s environment was free from accident hazards and that equipment used for transfers was in safe, functional condition. A resident with Parkinson’s Disease was being transferred from bed to a chair using a mechanical (Hoyer) lift operated by two CNAs. One CNA reported that when she arrived to assist, the resident was already positioned in the sling, and as the lift was raised, a sling strap snapped, causing the resident to fall and strike the back of the head. Review of the manufacturer’s instructions for the lift and slings showed that staff were required to inspect slings and lifting straps for signs of wear, fraying, or weakness prior to every use. Record review showed that the resident sustained an abrasion to the back of the head, a 1 cm scalp laceration, and reported pain in the shoulders and neck following the fall, and was transferred to the hospital for evaluation. Subsequent NP documentation confirmed the 1 cm scalp laceration was bleeding and that the resident rated back pain as 9/10 on a numeric pain scale. Although maintenance records reflected a general audit of equipment had been conducted several weeks before the incident, there was no evidence that the specific sling used for this transfer had been inspected for integrity prior to use. During interview, the Administrator acknowledged that the equipment failure and strap breakage resulted in the resident’s fall and injury.
Failure to Timely Report Alleged Sexual Abuse to SSA and APS
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse and neglect were reported immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation was made, to the State Survey Agency (SSA) and Adult Protective Services (APS). Resident 3, who was admitted with unspecified dementia and acute systolic congestive heart failure, was involved in two separate incidents in which her brother was observed kissing her on the mouth in a manner staff described as zealous, enthusiastic, sloppy, and not typical of a brother-sister interaction. On 12/28/25, CNA 1 observed a well-dressed man enter Resident 3's room, hug her, and give her a zealous kiss on the mouth. CNA 1 assumed the man was the resident's husband and reported this to LPN 1, who knew the visitor was the resident's brother. LPN 1 looked into the room and did not see anything out of the ordinary, and neither CNA 1 nor LPN 1 reported this incident as a potential allegation of abuse to the Administrator at that time. On 1/4/26, LPN 1 and CNA 1 entered Resident 3's room to address the resident's pain and request for catheter removal and to assist with a brief and linen change. Resident 3 had two visitors present, including her brother. When asked to step out for privacy, the female visitor left, but the brother hesitated and then gave Resident 3 a sloppy, open-mouthed kiss on the mouth lasting about three seconds, again in the presence of staff. The brother stated that Resident 3 was his older sister and that she had taken care of him since they were very small. LPN 1 did not report either the 12/28/25 or 1/4/26 kissing incidents to the Administrator. The Administrator later stated that the alleged abuse was first mentioned during a meeting on 1/6/26, at which time staff described the kiss as a weird, awkward kiss and not a typical brother-sister kiss, and acknowledged that nursing staff had not reported the suspicious activity in a timely manner, resulting in failure to notify SSA and APS within two hours of the allegation.
Delayed Hospital Transfer After Fall With Head Trauma and Anticoagulation
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that a resident who experienced a fall with head trauma and was on anticoagulation received timely treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The resident had diagnoses including generalized muscle weakness, gait and mobility abnormalities, and unspecified atrial fibrillation, and was on a blood thinner. On the evening of the fall, nursing documentation showed that the resident was found on the bathroom floor after her roommate called out. The resident reported hitting her head, had facial pain rated 5/10, and initial vital signs showed an O2 saturation of 88–90% with other vitals within normal limits. A neurological assessment was initiated, oxygen was applied, and the on‑call provider was notified, who ordered x‑rays of the resident’s head and left hand. As the evening progressed, the resident’s condition changed. The nurse documented that the resident’s right eye became increasingly swollen to the point that by 9:15 PM it was swollen shut and pupillary reactivity could no longer be assessed, while the left eye remained equal and reactive to light. The neurological exam form recorded that the provider was notified of the fall at 8:00 PM, but did not indicate that the provider was notified when the right eye became swollen shut at 9:15 PM. The DON later stated that this change in the resident’s condition occurred at 9:15 PM and that the medical provider was not notified of this change until the provider came to the facility the following day. The DON also stated that if a resident on a blood thinner experienced a fall with head strike, she expected staff to send the resident to the hospital, and that she was not sure why this resident was not immediately sent. The resident remained in the facility overnight while x‑rays were obtained around 1:00–1:30 AM, with results reportedly available sometime between early morning hours and mid‑morning. The next morning, the NP assessed the resident due to the fall and documented significant right facial swelling, focal tenderness over the zygoma, difficulty visualizing the right eye, and concern for occult injury and possible orbital blowout fracture in the context of anticoagulation. The NP ordered transfer to the emergency department for CT imaging of the head and face. In the emergency department, the physician documented that no evaluation for the resident’s injuries had occurred the previous evening and that the facility had reported the resident seemed slightly altered the prior night and had worsening swelling by the time EMS was called. CT imaging revealed traumatic small subdural and subarachnoid hemorrhages without mass effect and a large facial hematoma. Interviews with nursing staff showed that the RN on duty was very concerned about the resident’s rapidly increasing facial swelling and difficulty administering medications due to lip swelling, but was waiting for a physician order to send the resident to the hospital and was unaware at the time that she could initiate a hospital transfer without such an order. These actions and inactions resulted in a delay in sending the resident to the hospital after a significant change in condition following a fall with head trauma while on a blood thinner. The facility’s Change of Condition/SBAR Evaluation Policy outlined expectations for describing changes in condition, documenting vital signs, identifying changes from baseline (including neurological status changes), and notifying the provider and responsible party, as well as documenting immediate actions and outcomes such as transfer to the hospital. Despite this policy, the neurological exam form did not reflect timely provider notification when the resident’s right eye became swollen shut, and the resident was not transferred until the following day after the NP’s in‑person assessment. The DON confirmed that the change in condition at 9:15 PM was not communicated to the provider until the next day. The surveyors determined that, for this resident, the facility did not ensure timely hospital transfer and did not provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice after a fall with head injury and subsequent change in condition.
Failure to Implement Elopement Precautions and Supervision for High-Risk Resident
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide adequate supervision and implement elopement precautions for a cognitively impaired resident who was identified as being at risk for elopement. The resident was admitted with multiple neurological and substance-related diagnoses, including cerebral infarction, ataxia, Wernicke’s encephalopathy, alcohol and opioid dependence, and traumatic subdural hemorrhage. On admission, the resident’s elopement risk screening showed a score of 12, indicating elopement risk, and nursing documentation described poor safety awareness, poor judgment, and a need for continuous cues with self-care and ADLs. The resident was also noted to require 1:1 supervision during meals due to quick eating behavior. In the hours leading up to the elopement, nursing staff observed the resident wandering in the hallway and behind the nurse’s station and reported that he required constant redirection. The night shift RN informed the day shift LPN during report that the resident had been wandering since early morning and that a WanderGuard was recommended. Despite this, no WanderGuard was applied before the resident left the building. The LPN later stated that she did not know where to obtain a WanderGuard, and the DON confirmed that both the RN and LPN had not placed a WanderGuard because they did not know its location. On the day of the incident, the resident went to the kitchen and requested water, and kitchen staff noticed a fall risk bracelet on his wrist. After this interaction, staff discovered that the resident was no longer in the building. Facility investigation determined that the resident exited through the front door at approximately 9:37 AM and was later found off premises, about one mile away, walking on a sidewalk near a restaurant. A medication technician, who had previously seen the resident wandering in only a gown and had informed the nurse, located the resident and returned him to the facility. These events demonstrate that, despite known elopement risk and observed wandering behavior, the facility did not implement timely elopement precautions or ensure adequate supervision to prevent the resident from eloping.
Medication Administration Error Due to Failure to Verify Resident Identity
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves a failure to provide necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice during medication administration. For one resident reviewed for medication administration, a nurse did not follow the Five Rights of medication administration, specifically failing to properly identify the resident before giving medications. As a result, the nurse administered 0.25 mL of Lorazepam, an anti-anxiety medication, and 25 mg of Carvedilol, a beta-blocker used for blood pressure, that were intended for a different resident to Resident #1. Following the administration error, Resident #1’s vital signs were monitored throughout the night, and documentation indicated the resident remained stable, alert, and without signs of distress during the shift. The hospice nurse, nurse practitioner, and family were notified of the error. During interviews, the Administrator and DON acknowledged the medication error, and the DON confirmed that the nurse’s failure to correctly identify the resident prior to administering the medications was the cause of the wrong medications being given.
Burn Injury from Hot Soup Due to Inadequate Supervision and Temperature Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure adequate supervision and accident prevention for a resident who sustained a burn injury from hot food. One resident with end stage renal disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, pericardial effusion, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and an above-knee amputation of the left leg requested that staff heat a prepackaged ramen soup. Facility staff heated the soup in a microwave located in the nutrition station behind the nurse’s station according to the package directions and then returned the hot soup to the resident. After receiving the heated soup, the resident, who used a motorized wheelchair and was described as very independent, turned in his power wheelchair, causing the ramen to spill and the hot liquid to burn the palmar side of his left wrist. A progress note documented that the resident received a burn to his left wrist after spilling the hot soup, that the wound was assessed, wound care was provided, and new orders were placed following consultation with a wound provider. The resident reportedly tolerated treatment well and denied pain or other concerns at that time. Subsequent documentation by a wound provider classified the burn on the resident’s left wrist as a third-degree burn. Staff interviews revealed that, prior to this incident, staff heated residents’ food according to package directions and determined whether it was safe to return based on touch, without using thermometers to verify temperature. A CNA reported that the resident often asked CNAs to heat food and insisted on carrying it himself, and that staff declined to heat his food when he refused to allow them to carry it due to safety concerns. An LPN and the DON both confirmed that thermometers were not available for use before the burn occurred and that staff relied on touch to judge food temperature.
Insufficient Nursing Staff and Delayed Call Light Response Leading to Incontinence and Unattended Toileting
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide sufficient nursing staff with appropriate competencies and skills to meet residents’ needs, particularly in timely response to call lights and assistance with toileting, which resulted in incontinent episodes and residents being left unattended. Multiple residents reported long call light wait times, especially during evening and night shifts and on weekends, when there were as few as three CNAs for the entire building. Residents with significant physical limitations, including recent hip fractures, hemiplegia, and other serious conditions, described being unable to get to the bathroom without staff assistance and experiencing incontinence because staff did not respond promptly to their call lights. One resident with a periprosthetic hip fracture, hemiplegia, an artificial hip joint, major depressive disorder, and anxiety reported that from 6:00 PM to 6:00 AM there were only three CNAs for three hallways, resulting in long waits for call light responses. This resident stated she had incontinent bladder episodes when she first arrived because she could not hold her urine while waiting for help, including one instance where she waited 35 minutes for a response. Another resident with a left femur fracture, chronic pain, lupus, and epilepsy reported waiting an hour for her call light to be answered, leading to urinating in her brief because staff did not arrive in time to take her to the bathroom. A third resident with metabolic encephalopathy, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pneumonia, UTI, and end-stage renal disease on dialysis stated she had been left on the toilet and had to get herself off and back to bed due to lack of staff. CNA documentation showed multiple incontinent episodes for these residents despite staff describing them as continent of bowel and bladder. Additional residents and a family member reported frequent long call light wait times, including waits of 30–45 minutes, particularly during shift changes and on weekends. The Resident Council President reported that since a change in ownership, residents complained that call lights took 30–40 minutes to be answered and that there were not enough CNAs on the night shift to handle residents’ needs during evening and bedtime hours. Direct observations by surveyors documented call lights sounding for 8 to 13 minutes before being answered on multiple occasions. Staff interviews confirmed that CNA hours had been cut after the ownership change, that many staff had quit, and that staff were asked to work a lot of overtime and were sometimes unable to complete showers due to understaffing. One staff member reported a resident had an incontinent episode after waiting about 45 minutes for a call light response. Grievance records and resident council notes showed a repeated pattern of complaints over several months about slow call light response times, residents being left on the toilet for extended periods, and delays in getting to meals due to insufficient staff. Grievances included reports of residents waiting over an hour to be taken to breakfast, feeling ignored when requests were not fulfilled, and being left on the toilet for almost three hours, causing discomfort. Resident council notes repeatedly documented concerns about call lights taking a long time to be answered, not enough CNAs in the dining room at mealtimes, and residents being left on the toilet or not getting to breakfast on time. Although the facility’s written facility assessment and staffing plan referenced using acuity and tools such as the MDS and RAI to determine staffing, the DON stated that in practice staffing coverage was based on census rather than acuity and acknowledged there had been many issues with call lights since staffing was cut after the change in ownership.
Failure to Provide Palatable, Attractive Meals at Appropriate Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to consistently provide food and drink that were palatable, attractive, and served at safe and appetizing temperatures for multiple residents. Several residents reported that the food was bland, horrible, disgusting, or generally “not good,” and one resident stated that if she did not like what was served, staff did not offer an alternative and that she repeatedly received dark meat she did not like. A family member reported that a resident with a poor appetite received chicken that was dry and needed more moisture. Resident council minutes documented concerns that hamburgers were sometimes too raw, vegetables were roasted to the point of tasting burned, pork chops were difficult to cut or chew, and that food delivered to rooms was cold by the time it arrived when CNAs passed trays. Surveyors’ direct observation of a test tray showed that hot items were not maintained at appetizing temperatures and were of poor quality. After the last tray was plated and placed in the cart, CNAs—not dietary staff—were responsible for passing trays to residents, and there was no plate warmer between the plate and the plastic base. When the test tray was checked, the chicken tender and tater tots were below typical hot-holding temperatures, with the tater tots described as mushy and cold and the chicken tender as dry, tough to chew, and salty. The cold item, a carrot coin salad, was measured at a chilled temperature. Grievances documented that meals were served too cold and that residents were dissatisfied with the variety, fruit options, and perceived high carbohydrate content of the meals. The Dietary Manager acknowledged that dietary staff no longer delivered trays to residents after a change in ownership and attributed cold food to CNAs not passing trays quickly enough, while the Administrator acknowledged there had been complaints about food quality.
Failure to Provide Ordered Diet Textures During Nursing and Activities Snacks
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that residents received food in the texture ordered to meet their individual needs. One resident with dementia and Alzheimer’s disease had a physician’s order for a pureed diet after nursing, the DON, and the nurse practitioner observed that she was not eating well on a regular diet, was cheeking food, holding it in her mouth, and not chewing. Despite this pureed diet order, multiple nursing progress notes documented that she was given ham sandwiches and potato chips on several nights, and an activities note documented that she ate an ice cream cone. Staff interviews confirmed that she was on a pureed diet because she would let food sit in her mouth and that chips and sandwiches are not part of a pureed diet. The speech therapist stated he had not been asked to evaluate her swallowing, that he normally would want to screen residents whose diets were downgraded, and that non‑pureed foods for someone who holds food in their mouth would be a choking concern. Another resident with dementia and a severe cognitive impairment, as evidenced by a BIMS score of 3, had a physician’s order for a regular diet with minced and moist (Level 5) texture and cut‑up foods due to loose teeth. Nonetheless, an activities progress note documented that she ate a peanut cluster during a cooking social, and the Activities Director later reported that she was also given a “bird’s nest” snack made of crunchy chow mein noodles with candy on top, which she did not eat. Nursing staff stated that this resident did not have the mental capacity to chew, required extensive cueing, and that they would be concerned about choking if she were served non‑minced and moist foods. The Dietary Manager reported that the Activities Department provided its own snacks and did not ensure residents received the correct diet textures, and the DON stated that staff were expected to follow physician orders for diet textures despite limited availability of the speech therapist.
Failure to Provide Required Meal Setup and Cut Food Assistance for Resident With Upper Extremity Impairment
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve a resident’s ability to perform ADLs related to dining and eating, specifically cutting food into bite-sized pieces and opening containers as assessed and care planned. A resident with a right humerus fracture, chronic right arm pain, dementia with moderate cognitive impairment (BIMS 9), polyneuropathy, osteoarthritis, chronic pain syndrome, and a right artificial shoulder joint reported being unable to cut her own food and demonstrated that she had to guide her right arm with her left hand. Surveyors observed on multiple occasions that her meals were not consistently prepared or set up to match her assessed need for setup/clean-up assistance with eating. At one meal, her family reported they had to cut up her food and that this was not the first time. At another meal, her breakfast tray included whole sausage links, a lidded bowl, an unopened syrup packet, and a closed juice box with the straw still wrapped, despite her limited use of one arm. The resident’s MDS indicated impairment in one upper extremity and a need for setup or clean-up assistance with eating, and her care plan documented a focus on ADL self-care performance deficit related to dementia and impaired balance, with an intervention that she required setup or clean-up assistance to eat. However, her physician’s diet order specified only a regular diet with regular texture and consistency, with no instruction for cut-up food or meal setup assistance. The Dietary Manager confirmed there were no directions on the resident’s meal card to cut up her food and stated that food was sometimes cut into strips, including pork cutlets, based on the type of food. The MDS Coordinator and an RN both stated that the resident needed her food cut up and lids removed for meal setup and that it would be too difficult for her to manage with one arm, but acknowledged these needs were not reflected in physician orders. Staff also noted that the resident likely could not cut her own food due to right arm pain and limited function and that she would not usually ask for help even when needed, yet the kitchen and nursing staff did not consistently ensure her food was cut into bite-sized pieces or that containers were opened for her.
Some of the Latest Corrective Actions taken by Facilities in Utah
The facilities implemented several corrective actions to address the safety and supervision deficiencies.
- The facility assessed the resident for injuries, contacted police upon suspicion, and updated care plans as needed. Staff received training on abuse prevention and elopement protocols. (J - F0600 - UT)
- The Director of Nursing audited residents with medical devices to ensure proper care planning and staff training. Staff were trained on safe transfers and accident prevention, including appropriate transfer techniques. The Administrator ensured transportation staff were trained and competent in securing residents during transport. (J - F0726 - UT) (J - F0689 - UT)
- The facility partnered with an organization to provide training and new protocols for resident transport. Transportation staff were reeducated on proper securement procedures and underwent competency evaluations. The Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee approved the updated driver safety program and implemented ongoing audits. (G - F0689 - UT)
- The facility audited residents' transfer statuses to ensure appropriate equipment was used. Staff received re-education on changes in condition, appropriate lifts, and safe transfer methods. Department heads conducted spot checks to verify compliance with transfer protocols. (G - F0689 - UT)
Failure to Provide Timely Care and Monitoring for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and care for two residents, leading to deficiencies in care. Resident 46 experienced ongoing emesis and abdominal pain, but the facility did not ensure timely monitoring or intervention. Despite receiving a stat order for an ultrasound, the facility delayed contacting the contracted radiology provider, resulting in a significant delay in obtaining the ultrasound. The resident continued to experience symptoms without adequate assessment or communication with the physician, ultimately leading to the resident's death. Resident 46 had a complex medical history, including hemiplegia, chronic obstructive pyelonephritis, severe sepsis, aspiration pneumonitis, acute kidney failure, supraventricular tachycardia, and bipolar disorder. Despite these conditions, the facility staff failed to document and communicate the resident's change in condition effectively. Multiple staff members observed the resident's deteriorating condition, including vomiting and abdominal pain, but there was a lack of coordinated response and communication with the medical team. Similarly, Resident 298, who had a history of dementia, hypertension, and acute kidney failure, did not receive timely diagnostic testing for a suspected deep vein thrombosis. The facility canceled a scheduled appointment and failed to ensure the ultrasound was performed promptly. This lack of timely intervention and communication with healthcare providers contributed to the deficiency in care for both residents.
Removal Plan
- The community management team implemented a morning Standup meeting with Nursing to get report from previous day's activities/concerns. If changes in condition are noted from communication notes, DON or ADON will verify MD team had been notified and if notification has not been made will do so at that time. Consultants will attend morning meetings when in-person and participate in random morning meetings when offsite to ensure compliance.
- The nursing team implemented a new shift communication form that will be relayed at shift change with oncoming nurse for concerns/follow-up items still pending at shift change. All forms will be left in the drawer at nurse's station for management review at the next morning standup meeting. Consultants will provide training on this process.
- A new CNA communication program/sheets implemented as a way for CNAs to communicate with oncoming shift and report to nurse. Sheets will be collected daily and reviewed during the daily standup meeting with department managers. Consultants will provide education and training on this process.
- Nursing implemented a new Communication and Follow-Up book that will remain at the nursing station. The book is a duplicate copy book with highlights and follow-up items from the previous day. The original will be removed and reviewed at daily manager Standup meeting. Consultants will provide education and training on this process.
- Communication improvements made between the building and MD team by adding the DON and Administrator to the secure messaging app between the MD group and Facility. Areas of concern or issues that arise will be addressed in the manager stand-up meeting.
- Representatives from the consulting organization reviewed and assessed the facility's policies and procedures regarding changes in resident condition. The consultants provided the community with a change of condition policy to adopt. The consultants provided education and training with licensed nursing and nursing assistants.
- Facility in coordination with the consulting organization, the consultants will complete record reviews of all residents to ensure no resident has experienced a change in condition not previously identified. Any findings of change of condition will be reported to the resident's attending physician and the resident's representative. This information will be communicated with the DON and Administrator at the manager stand-up meeting.
- The consultants ongoing will review daily progress notes to ensure documented changes of condition are timely identified and action steps are taken with resident changes of condition.
Resident Found in Locked Therapy Room with Alleged Abuse by Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from abuse, resulting in an Immediate Jeopardy citation. A resident with a history of dementia and cognitive impairments was found missing by staff, and after a search, was discovered exiting a locked therapy room. The resident made statements indicating that a male staff member engaged in sexual actions with her. The therapy room was inaccessible to staff, and the resident was found pale, nauseated, and disoriented, with therapy paperwork in hand. Interviews with staff revealed that the therapy room was locked, and the resident was missing for approximately 20 minutes. Staff observed the resident exiting the therapy room, appearing sick and disoriented. The resident later disclosed to staff that she and a male staff member attempted to engage in sexual activity, which was reportedly consensual according to the resident. However, the resident's cognitive impairments raised concerns about her ability to consent. The male staff member, a Physical Therapy Assistant, was found in the facility after hours, contrary to previous instructions. Staff reported that the therapy room was usually unlocked, and the male staff member's presence in the facility after hours had been a concern. The facility's failure to ensure the safety and security of the resident, as well as the lack of access to the therapy room, contributed to the deficiency.
Removal Plan
- Resident and staff member were separated.
- Police contacted upon suspicion.
- Resident assessed; no injury noted.
- Notification to Physicians, POA, Incident reported by administrator to DHS, APS, Ombudsman.
- Resident interviewed with administrator.
- Hospital evaluation completed, no trauma noted.
- Resident care plan reviewed and updated as needed.
- Provider to assess/evaluate residents including medication review.
- Social Services wellness visits to be completed for resident and PRN.
- Behavioral health visit requested with local mental health provider.
- Therapy staff member was immediately placed on administrative leave, facility keys/badge provided to administrator.
- Therapy staff member was questioned and released by the police, pending potential charges.
- Employee file was reviewed.
- Therapy staff member will not return to the facility.
- Regional Director of Operations spoke to Therapy Regional Director and informed him that staff are not to stay in the facility after normal business hours without the approval of the facility administrator.
- Facility will ensure the therapy staff working in the facility have background checks (DACS) that are connected to the facility.
- All residents interviewed by administrator/designee to assess potential for abuse/neglect allegations.
- Locks will be removed from all doors and/or Master Key accessible to charge nurse on medication cart.
- Staff Members will not remain in the facility after normal business hours without the approval of the facility administrator.
- Administrator, DON and RNC reviewed Abuse & Neglect Policy.
- Administrator, DON and IDT were educated by RNC regarding Abuse & Neglect Policy.
- Administrator/DON/designee will complete Abuse & Neglect education with all staff.
- Education including post-test initiated for all facility staff on Abuse/Neglect.
- All employees will be educated at start of their next shift or if no scheduled shift by all staff meeting.
- The DON/designee will review incidents of sexually inappropriate behavior to ensure appropriate interventions are implemented and no trends are noted.
- The Administrator/designee will conduct random resident & staff interviews to ensure the Abuse & Neglect Policy have been followed and allegations have been investigated and reported.
- The facility administrator/designee will do random facility visits during off hours to ensure that only staff clocked in and assigned to be working are in the facility and that the charge nurse has a Master Key to all locked doors in the facility.
- The Administrator/designee will review employee files (including contracted therapist) to ensure they have completed abuse training, verification of license and background checks (DACS) is connected to the facility.
- Medical Director was informed of the incident and QAA Review & Recommendations.
- Results will be reported to the QAA committee from monitoring and follow-up.
Failure to Prevent Sexual Abuse and Elopement
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prevent an instance of sexual abuse between two residents and neglected to provide the necessary supervision to prevent the elopement of another resident. Resident 269, who had severe cognitive impairment and a history of wandering, was found naked from the waist down on top of Resident 270, who was also cognitively impaired and nonverbal. The incident occurred when the staff responsible for monitoring the memory care unit were occupied with other tasks, leaving the residents unsupervised. This lack of supervision allowed Resident 269 to enter Resident 270's room and engage in inappropriate behavior, which was only discovered when therapists were searching for Resident 269 for a therapy session. The facility's failure to monitor Resident 269's wandering behavior and provide adequate supervision directly led to the incident of sexual abuse, which was verified by the facility's investigation. In a separate incident, Resident 17, who had a history of wandering and severe cognitive impairment, eloped from the facility. The resident was found and returned by a police officer. The facility's records indicated that Resident 17 had been assessed as a high risk for wandering and required frequent safety checks. However, the facility failed to implement a coordinated plan to supervise the resident's whereabouts, leading to the elopement. The receptionist, who was assisting another resident outside, believed that Resident 17 eloped through the front door during this time. The facility's lack of a coordinated plan and failure to monitor Resident 17's wandering behavior resulted in the resident's elopement. Both incidents were determined to be noncompliant and constituted immediate jeopardy. The facility's failure to prevent the sexual abuse of Resident 270 and the elopement of Resident 17 highlighted significant lapses in supervision and monitoring of residents with known wandering behaviors and cognitive impairments. These deficiencies were identified through interviews, record reviews, and witness statements, which documented the events leading to the incidents and the facility's inadequate response to the residents' needs for supervision and safety.
Removal Plan
- Resident was assessed for injury; no injuries were found.
- Facility representative spoke with family who reported that she had done this type of thing at home.
- Resident was determined to be a high risk for further elopements and would need to be moved to the secure unit. Resident was transferred to the secure unit to prevent further elopements.
- IDT reviewed the elopement.
- A training was conducted for the all staff meeting. Clinical training topics included labs, abuse reporting, and elopement prevention.
- Facility IDT met to review elopement process.
- Elopement binder was created for all high-risk residents on Cambridge.
- CNA Coordinator was given instructions to create tools for the staff, including a task sheet to alert staff of high-risk behaviors for residents and elopement sheets for the elopement binder.
- CNA Coordinator was given responsibility to round at least twice daily to verify the unit was running smoothly and that staff had the tools they needed to care for the residents.
- Administrator/Designee began holding meetings with CNA coordinator regarding the flow of the unit, communication, and the competency of the supervising staff on the unit.
- QAPI committee reviewed the events and identified the need for further interventions for elopement/abuse prevention.
- QAPI committee began creating care kits for memory care residents to decrease boredom, exit seeking, and help residents who were up at night.
- Residents were separated, and the abuse investigation was initiated.
- The police were notified, CMS was notified.
- The resident was placed on 1:1 with the intention to remain until the investigation was complete and interventions could identify how to prevent recurrence.
- The victim was moved off the unit.
- An internal meeting was held to review the investigation with the Regional Nurse Consultant, the Director of Clinical Services, the Corporate LCSW, the Facility Administrator, and Director of Nursing.
- Director of Nursing conducted an in-service with facility staff on Abuse Prevention with a post-test validation.
- The perpetrator was reviewed by the Behavioral Health Facility Committee to validate interventions were effective and further abuse prevented.
- Corporate LCSW provided a training with the Social Services Department on Sexual Intimacy in the LTC setting, Assessing Capacity to Consent, Care Planning, and appropriate Documentation.
- Corporate LCSW came to the facility and assessed the Perpetrator and reviewed the interventions in place.
- Cameras were set up to enhance visibility in the unit for staff.
- Computers in the unit were connected to be able to view halls for when CNAs were busy in rooms.
- Facility reviewed staffing patterns on the unit to validate that there was proper supervision on the unit.
- An investigation was conducted and found that the abuse program was not being run in accordance with facility policy and procedure.
- The administrator was terminated.
- A facility manager took over the facility with significant oversight of the RVP/Designee.
Inadequate Staff Training Leads to Resident Injury
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involved a failure to ensure that nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide safe and effective care for a resident, leading to a series of incidents that compromised the resident's well-being. A resident was transported in a facility van without proper securement of their wheelchair, resulting in the resident falling backward and sustaining a hyperextension injury to the neck. This incident led to a diagnosis of central cord syndrome and edema at the C6 and C7 levels of the cervical spine. The facility's failure to provide adequate training for staff responsible for transporting residents was a significant factor in this incident. Following the transport incident, the resident's care continued to be compromised. Upon returning to the facility, the resident's cervical collar, which was ordered to be worn at all times, was removed by CNAs during grooming and bathing. This removal occurred without proper supervision or understanding of the potential risks, as the CNAs were not adequately trained or informed about the necessity of the cervical collar. The resident was then unsuccessfully transferred to bed, resulting in the resident being assisted to the floor, further indicating a lack of competency in safe transfer techniques among the staff. The report highlights that the facility did not conduct proper orientation and training for newly hired nurse assistants and CNAs, which contributed to the inadequate care provided to the resident. The CNAs involved in the incidents were not properly trained on the use of medical devices such as the cervical collar, nor were they adequately supervised during critical care activities. This lack of training and supervision was a direct cause of the deficiencies observed, leading to the resident's compromised safety and well-being.
Removal Plan
- The Director of Nursing/Designee to do an audit of all residents to identify residents with medical devices or fixtures surgically placed, or otherwise applied to, or adjacent to their person. Identified devices reviewed to validate monitoring orders, care planning, and appropriate staff training are in place.
- The Director of Rehab/Designee to complete an assessment of all resident's transfer status, including type of transfer and number of staff to perform safely. Care Plans Reviewed and Updated as indicated to reflect current needs.
- The Director of Nursing/Designee to provide training on safe transfers and accident/hazards prevention to Facility Nurses and Nursing Assistants. Training to include proper transfer techniques utilized in the facility, the prohibition of using towel transfers, and where to find information in the care plan regarding individualized requirements for transfers. This training will be validated by a post-test to validate understanding of the material and Physical Therapist to complete return demonstration of transfer techniques with staff.
- The Director of Nursing to provide training to all Facility Nurses and Nursing Assistants on the definition of a fall and what documentation must be completed when a fall occurs. This training will be validated by a post-test to validate understanding of the material.
- The Administrator reviewed all individuals who perform transport duties and validated they have received training including securement of wheelchairs, securement of ambulatory residents, and securement of equipment in the transport van. A return demonstration checklist will be completed with transportation staff prior to their next transport.
- Any future staff member(s) providing transport services are to receive this training prior to beginning transport duties. Existing drivers to receive refresher training annually and as needed.
- The Chief Nursing Officer (CNO)/designee will provide education to the Inter-disciplinary team (IDT) about company policy on orientation and training to staff who provide direct patient care to residents of the facility and how to properly transfer residents.
- The Director of Nursing/Designee to review employees who have been hired in the past three months to verify orientation training has been completed. Any employee who does not have the orientation completed will meet with the Director of Nursing/Designee prior to the start of their next shift to create a plan to complete their training and review key interventions to keep residents safe.
- The Director of Nursing/Designee to create a summary of this training and put this in the agency binder, to provide agency staff resources to prevent accident/hazards.
- All Staff will receive training by Director of Nursing/Designee prior to their next working shift.
- The Director of Nursing/Designee to do interview with Charge Nurse(s) for each shift and review expectations for accident/hazards prevention and reporting until the IJ abatement is completed.
- The facility to review the 24-hour report in daily stand-up meetings, and as needed to validate that any accidents/hazards were followed up with in accordance with professional accepted standards of care. This audit to continue ongoing.
Facility's Failure to Ensure Resident Safety Leads to Multiple Incidents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a safe environment for its residents, resulting in multiple incidents of harm and immediate jeopardy. One significant incident involved a resident who was improperly secured in a wheelchair during transport in the facility van, leading to a fall that caused a hyperextension injury to the cervical spine, resulting in central cord syndrome. The resident's condition was further compromised when CNAs removed the cervical collar during grooming and bathing, which was against the medical order for the collar to be worn at all times. This lack of adherence to safety protocols and inadequate staff training on securing residents during transport and handling medical devices contributed to the resident's injury and subsequent complications. Additionally, the facility experienced several other incidents indicating a failure to maintain a hazard-free environment and provide adequate supervision. These included a resident sustaining a fractured hip after multiple falls, another resident tripping over a broken structural column, and a resident being unsafely discharged and found wandering. There were also instances of residents eloping from the facility, a resident being injured by another resident with a razor, and a resident being hit by a meal cart. These events highlight the facility's systemic issues in identifying and mitigating accident hazards and ensuring resident safety. The facility's deficiencies were compounded by inadequate staff training and oversight. The CNA Coordinator responsible for the transport incident had not received proper training on securing residents in the transport vehicle. Furthermore, the facility's documentation practices were insufficient, as evidenced by the lack of monitoring orders for the cervical collar and incomplete incident reports. These deficiencies underscore the need for comprehensive staff training and robust safety protocols to prevent future incidents and ensure resident well-being.
Removal Plan
- The Director of Nursing/Designee to do an audit of all residents to identify residents with medical devices or fixtures surgically placed, or otherwise applied to, or adjacent to their person. Identified devices reviewed to validate monitoring orders, care planning, and appropriate staff training are in place.
- The Director of Rehab/Designee to complete an assessment of all resident's transfer status, including type of transfer and number of staff to perform safely. Care Plans Reviewed and Updated as indicated to reflect current needs.
- The Director of Nursing/Designee to provide training on safe transfers and accident/hazards prevention to Facility Nurses and Nursing Assistants. Training to include proper transfer techniques utilized in the facility, the prohibition of using towel transfers, and where to find information in the care plan regarding individualized requirements for transfers. This training will be validated by a post-test to validate understanding of the material and Physical Therapist to complete return demonstration of transfer techniques with staff.
- The Director of Nursing to provide training to all Facility Nurses and Nursing Assistants on the definition of a fall and what documentation must be completed when a fall occurs. This training will be validated by a post-test to validate understanding of the material.
- The Administrator reviewed all individuals who perform transport duties and validated they have received training including securement of wheelchairs, securement of ambulatory residents, and securement of equipment in the transport van. A return demonstration checklist will be completed with transportation staff prior to their next transport.
- Any future staff member(s) providing transport services are to receive this training prior to beginning transport duties. Existing drivers to receive refresher training annually and as needed.
- The Chief Nursing Officer (CNO)/designee will provide education to the Inter-disciplinary team (IDT) about company policy on orientation and training to staff who provide direct patient care to residents of the facility and how to properly transfer residents.
- The Director of Nursing/Designee to review employees who have been hired in the past three months to verify orientation training has been completed. Any employee who does not have the orientation completed will meet with the Director of Nursing/Designee prior to the start of their next shift to create a plan to complete their training and review key interventions to keep residents safe.
- The Director of Nursing/Designee to create a summary of this training and put this in the agency binder, to provide agency staff resources to prevent accident/hazards.
- All Staff will receive training by Director of Nursing/Designee prior to their next working shift.
- The Director of Nursing/Designee to do interview with Charge Nurse(s) for each shift and review expectations for accident/hazards prevention and reporting until the IJ abatement is completed.
- The facility to review the 24-hour report in daily stand-up meetings, and as needed to validate that any accidents/hazards were followed up with in accordance with professional accepted standards of care. This audit to continue ongoing.
Resident Injury Due to Improper Securement During Transport
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident received the necessary supervision and assistance devices to prevent an accident during transportation. Specifically, a resident was not properly secured in a facility vehicle, leading to the resident sliding out of their wheelchair and sustaining a femur fracture. The incident occurred when the transportation driver had to brake suddenly, and it was later revealed that the lap belt was not secured on the resident. The resident involved had a medical history that included diabetes mellitus type 2, hypotension, muscle weakness, and required assistance with personal care and mobility. The resident used a wheelchair and had moderately impaired cognition, as indicated by a BIMS score of 11. On the day of the incident, the resident was being transported back from a doctor's appointment when the accident occurred, resulting in injuries that required hospitalization. The transportation driver admitted to neglecting to secure the lap belt, although the wheelchair was harnessed at four points. The incident was reported to the Survey State Agency, and the facility's investigation confirmed the oversight in securing the resident properly. The resident was evaluated by a facility nurse and emergency medical services were called, leading to the resident's transport to an acute care hospital where a left femur fracture was diagnosed.
Removal Plan
- The facility entered into an agreement with an organization to implement and provide training and new protocols to transport facility residents.
- All staff who performed transportation services for the facility were reeducated on proper securement of residents during transport, which included training videos produced by the contracted organization.
- Transportation staff attested to the completion of the training by signing training records.
- Transportation staff were required to complete a post-training test.
- All staff members who performed transportation services were required to read and sign the Fleet Safety Program book.
- Staff members were interviewed regarding safety during transportation.
- Administrative staff interviewed residents to determine if there were additional concerns about safety during transportation.
- The facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee approved the updated driver safety training program.
- The transportation supervisor will audit the transport of each driver daily for 2 weeks, followed by audits on 3 random days of the week for 1 week, with an audit 1 day per week for 1 week.
- The transportation supervisor will perform ongoing random audits.
- The transportation supervisor or designee will validate transportation driver's pre and post-securement, documenting the results every week for 4 weeks then bi-weekly for 2 weeks, and 3 random audits every month thereafter.
- The transportation supervisor will report any trends or concerns to the QAPI committee for review for 90 days.
- Any discrepancies will be addressed at time of discovery.
Inadequate Supervision and Improper Transfer Method Result in Resident Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance devices for a resident, leading to an accident. Resident 217, who had a history of cerebrovascular accident, right bundle branch block, heart failure, and major depressive disorder, was dependent on staff for transfers due to his inability to stand. Despite this, on a specific date, CNA 4 used a sit-to-stand device to transfer the resident, contrary to the care plan that required a Hoyer lift with two-person assistance. During the transfer, the resident was unable to bear weight, causing his arms to move upward, but the transfer was completed without immediate signs of pain. Subsequently, the resident was found to have a swollen and bruised left shoulder, which was later diagnosed as a fracture of the left humeral surgical neck. The facility's investigation revealed that the injury likely occurred during the improper transfer by CNA 4. The resident's condition, compounded by his non-verbal status due to the cerebrovascular accident, meant he could not communicate pain effectively, delaying the recognition of the injury. The facility's documentation and communication were also found lacking. The weekly skin assessment inaccurately reported no skin issues, despite bruising being observed earlier. Additionally, the bruising was not reported to management until two days after it was first noticed. This delay in reporting and the initial use of an inappropriate transfer method contributed to the harm experienced by the resident.
Removal Plan
- Audit all residents with current sit to stand transfers to ensure the current lift being used is appropriate for the resident status.
- Perform re-education 1:1 in huddles or over the phone regarding change of condition, bruising, range of motion, and which lift is appropriate for resident current condition.
- Complete audits with department heads on spot checking rooms to ensure staff members are using the appropriate lift with two-person transfer.
- Make unit managers aware of any changes with therapy evaluation with the lifts.
Explore Popular Searches
