Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0552
D

Failure to Inform and Obtain Consent for Medication and Wanderguard Placement

Salt Lake City, Utah Survey Completed on 06-19-2025

Penalty

Fine: $13,000
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that two residents or their representatives were fully informed and able to participate in decisions regarding their care and treatment. For one resident with severe vascular dementia and significant cognitive impairment, the facility initiated an antidepressant medication (Escitalopram) without notifying or obtaining consent from the resident's representative prior to starting the medication. Record review and interviews confirmed that no documentation of consent or notification was found before the medication was administered. In another case, a resident who had recently eloped from the facility was fitted with a wanderguard device upon return. Documentation showed that the wanderguard was placed before obtaining informed consent from the resident or her guardian. The consent form and related progress note were completed two days after the device was applied, and staff interviews confirmed that consent should have been obtained prior to placement. These actions demonstrate a failure to inform and involve residents or their representatives in advance of significant care interventions.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙