Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around February 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Schulenburg Regency Nursing Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Expired meds and other items were found in the med room, including protein supplement, vaginal cream, dressing change kits, sterile saline syringes, and an opened bottle of wine in the residents’ refrigerator. RNs and the ADON gave differing accounts of who was responsible for checking the med room, but all said expired items should not have remained with active meds. Record review showed no recent in-services on labeling, storage, or destruction of expired meds, and the facility policy stated outdated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed.
Inadequate Nail Care for Two Residents: Two residents did not receive needed nail care. One resident with DM had blackish/brownish debris under fingernails and an uneven nail edge, while another resident with OA and limited mobility had very long, rough fingernails despite asking staff to trim and file them. The resident also had a scratch on her arm that she said was caused by a rough fingernail. Staff stated nail care responsibilities were assigned to CNAs or nurses depending on the resident, and the facility policy required routine cleaning, filing, and trimming of nails.
A resident with DM, obesity, and cancer developed new skin concerns involving MASD to the buttocks and thigh and a diabetic ulcer to the toe. The nurse who completed the skin check did not measure the areas, document drainage or pain, take photos, or notify the treatment nurse, MD/PA, family, or oncoming staff. The treatment nurse later confirmed the new wounds were identified after the fact, and staff interviews showed the change of condition was not properly communicated.
Improper Hand Hygiene During Food Service: A Dietary Assistant handled a contaminated clipboard, touched her scrub top, and then served food from the steam table without washing or sanitizing her hands. She also touched the inside of divided plates and the chicken spaghetti while plating food. The Dietary Supervisor stated staff were required to wash hands between tasks and after touching contaminated items, and the facility policy required handwashing during food prep and after contamination.
A Med Aide used the same wrist BP monitor on two residents without sanitizing it before use, between residents, or after finishing with the second resident. One resident had HTN with intact cognition, and the other had HTN with moderately impaired cognition. The aide said she had been trained on hand hygiene but not on sanitizing medical equipment, while the ADON confirmed that equipment sanitization between residents was expected and part of standard precautions.
Surveyors observed a dietary assistant failing to wash hands after touching her clothes, hair, and face before handling food, and using a soiled dish rag instead of an oven mitt to remove bacon from the oven, resulting in direct contact between the rag and the food. Both the dietary manager and administrator confirmed these actions violated facility protocols for hand hygiene and food safety, and that contaminated food should be discarded.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of elopement exited a memory care unit twice, once being outside for about an hour in high temperatures. The facility failed to implement effective interventions to prevent elopement, and staff were unfamiliar with the resident's behaviors. Inadequate monitoring of exit doors and non-operational cameras contributed to the incidents.
Care plans for three residents were not updated to reflect current physician orders and clinical needs, including suprapubic catheter care, transfer assistance requirements, and diet consistency changes. Staff interviews revealed confusion about care plan responsibilities and usage, and the facility's policy for timely updates was not followed.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple medical conditions fell from a van due to a transportation aide's failure to follow proper unloading procedures. The aide did not raise the lift to the van's door, resulting in the resident falling onto the ground, sustaining a laceration and hematoma. The aide was terminated for not adhering to the facility's protocol.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple health issues did not receive their prescribed Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen due to misappropriation. During a shift change, a nurse discovered that five tablets in the resident's medication bottle were replaced with Isosorbide Mononitrate, a medication not prescribed to any resident. The off-going nurse refused a drug screen and was terminated. The facility's failure to follow medication storage and administration protocols led to this incident.
The facility failed to remove expired medications from the storage room, including bisacodyl suppositories and Gentamicin intended for a resident with multiple diagnoses. Staff interviews revealed that regular checks for expired medications were expected but not effectively carried out, leading to the deficiency.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions had an out-of-hospital do-not-resuscitate (OOH-DNR) order in her chart that lacked the required physician signature. Staff interviews confirmed the form was incomplete and not valid, despite the resident's or family's request for DNR status. Facility policy and state law require a physician's signature for OOH-DNR validity, and the deficiency was identified through record review and staff interviews.
Staff failed to consistently wear required PPE, including face shields or goggles, when entering the rooms of residents on droplet precautions for COVID-19, and PPE supplies were not adequately stocked outside affected rooms. Several residents with recent COVID-19 diagnoses and complex medical histories were placed at risk due to incomplete adherence to infection control protocols and inconsistent staff knowledge regarding PPE requirements.
The facility failed to ensure that the ADON had a current RN license while she conducted assessments and provided care to residents. The ADON's license was expired for several months, during which she performed various evaluations and direct care activities. This oversight was due to a misunderstanding in the HR department regarding the process for checking licenses and a transition in the payroll system that disrupted notifications.
Expired Medications and Improper Storage in Medication Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services were provided to meet each resident’s needs by allowing expired medications and other expired items to remain in the medication storage room. During an observation of the medication room, surveyors found two bottles of Pro-Stat Concentrated Liquid Protein expired in January 2026, one Miconazole Nitrate Vaginal Cream 4% expired in September 2025, two dressing change kits with Stat Lock expired in August 2025, eight sterile saline syringes expired in October 2025, and one bottle of Chardonnay stored in the residents’ refrigerator with an opened date of 5/18/2025. Interviews with RN J, RN K, and the ADON showed differing statements about who was responsible for checking and removing expired items, but all stated that expired items should not have been among active medications. RN J said the nurse in charge was responsible and that the room had last been checked on 3/4/26. RN K said everyone was responsible and that the room had been checked the previous Tuesday. The ADON also stated that maintaining the medication room was everyone’s responsibility and that expired items were supposed to be stored in a locked cabinet for destruction. Record review showed no in-services from September 2025 through 3/11/26 on labeling, storage, and destruction of expired medications, and the facility policy stated that discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed.
Inadequate Nail Care for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to perform activities of daily living received necessary nail care to maintain hygiene and grooming. During observation on 03/09/2026, Resident #17, a male with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, and lack of coordination, was seen sitting in a specialty chair in the common area with a blackish/brownish substance under the middle and ring fingernails on his right hand, and his middle fingernail was uneven around the edges. His baseline care plan indicated he required one-person assistance with personal hygiene, eating, toileting, dressing, bathing, and transfers. Resident #17 did not respond to questions about his nails and was not interviewable. Resident #91, a female with diagnoses including unspecified osteoarthritis, muscle weakness, need for assistance in personal care, and stiffness in both shoulders, had a quarterly MDS showing intact cognition with a BIMS score of 15. She required assistance with personal hygiene and substantial to maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, showers, and lower body dressing. On 03/09/2026, she was observed in a wheelchair with very long fingernails on both hands, and the middle, ring, and fore fingernails on her right hand were rough around the edges. She stated she had asked staff two days earlier to trim and file her nails, but the staff member told her it would be done sometime the following week. She also stated she had arthritis, it hurt to try to file her own nails, and she preferred staff to trim and file them. Resident #91 pointed to a scratch on her left arm that she said she caused with one of her rough fingernails. Interviews with an LVN, CNA, and ADON showed staff understood that nail care included cleaning, trimming, and filing nails, with nurses responsible for residents with diabetes and CNAs responsible for other residents. They also stated residents had not refused nail care and that rough or dirty nails could lead to scratching or illness if debris were swallowed. The facility policy stated routine nail care should include cleaning under nails, filing rough edges, and trimming fingernails as part of daily personal hygiene and grooming.
Incomplete Skin Assessment and Failure to Report New Wounds
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a thorough skin assessment and timely communication of new skin concerns for a resident with type 2 diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, and vulvar cancer. The resident’s quarterly MDS reflected intact cognition, frequent pain, and risk for pressure ulcers/injuries. Her care plan identified risk for impaired skin integrity, moisture associated skin damage (MASD) to the right buttock and left thigh, and a diabetic ulcer on the right 4th toe. The weekly skin assessment on 03/08/2026 documented new skin concerns, including 2 skin tears, red open areas to the buttocks, and 1 open area to the right toe, but the assessment did not include measurements, exact locations on the buttocks, drainage, pain assessment, or photographs. The record showed that the nurse who completed the 03/08/2026 skin assessment did not document a nurse’s note with full assessment details and did not notify the treatment nurse, physician, family, or communicate the change of condition on the facility communication board. The treatment nurse later stated she was not notified of the buttocks and thigh concerns and only learned of the toe issue from another nurse on 03/09/2026. The nurse who completed the assessment acknowledged she did not complete the assessment correctly, did not measure the areas, did not note drainage or skin discoloration, did not take pictures, and did not report the new skin concerns. Subsequent documentation by the treatment nurse identified new in-house acquired wounds on the right gluteus, left posterior thigh, and right 4th toe, with measurements and wound characteristics recorded after the fact. The resident stated she first became aware of the buttocks areas when told by staff during the skin assessment and reported that the toe had become red, swollen, and draining. Staff interviews confirmed that the new skin concerns were not properly reported or documented when first identified, and the DON stated that new skin concerns were expected to be measured, documented, photographed if needed, and reported immediately to the physician and treatment nurse.
Improper Hand Hygiene During Food Service
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in one of two kitchens reviewed. During observation, a Dietary Assistant was seen handling a clipboard with both bare hands, touching a hard black substance on the top of the clipboard, placing the clipboard on a shelf, and then touching her scrub top with both hands. She then went to the steam table and picked up divided plates with her left hand, placing food on areas of the plates where her fingers had touched. She also pulled aluminum foil away from chicken spaghetti and her fingers touched inside the foil and the chicken spaghetti in the pan. She did not wash or sanitize her hands during these tasks and stated she had not washed or sanitized prior to serving food. During interview, the Dietary Assistant stated the clipboard had black dirty substance on it, that she touched it and her scrub top, and that both were contaminated. She acknowledged she did not wash her hands after touching the clipboard and stated it was expected to wash hands prior to serving food. The Dietary Supervisor stated staff were required to wash hands between tasks and whenever they touched anything contaminated, and that the clipboard and clothes were considered contaminated. The facility policy stated employees must wash their hands during food preparation, as often as necessary to remove soil and contamination, and to prevent cross contamination when changing tasks or after engaging in other activities that contaminate the hands.
Failure to Sanitize Blood Pressure Monitor Between Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program when Med Aide C did not sanitize a wrist blood pressure monitor before using it on Resident #21, between Resident #21 and Resident #87, and after using it on Resident #87. During the observation, Med Aide C obtained Resident #21’s blood pressure with the monitor without prior sanitization, then used the same monitor on Resident #87 without sanitizing it first, and did not sanitize it after finishing with Resident #87 until the investigator pointed out the omission. Resident #21 was an older female admitted with diagnoses including unsteadiness on feet, muscle weakness, muscle wasting, lack of coordination, history of falling, and hypertension; her BIMS score was 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #87 was an older male admitted with diagnoses including unsteadiness on feet, muscle weakness, muscle wasting, lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, and hypertension; his BIMS score was 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Record review showed both residents had care plans addressing hypertension and medication orders requiring blood pressure monitoring. Med Aide C stated she had received training on hand sanitization between residents but had not received training on sanitizing medical equipment between patients. The ADON, who also served as infection preventionist, confirmed the expectation that medical equipment be sanitized between residents and stated that standard precautions included sanitizing medical equipment. Review of in-service records from 10/01/25 to 03/10/26 showed no in-services on cleaning medical equipment, and the one infection control in-service on 02/03/26 did not include Med Aide C on the sign-in sheet. The facility policy stated reusable resident-care equipment is to be cleaned and disinfected between residents.
Failure to Follow Food Safety and Hand Hygiene Protocols in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper food handling and hygiene practices in the kitchen, as observed with one dietary assistant during meal preparation. The dietary assistant was seen touching her shirt, hair, and face, and then proceeded to handle bowls of cereal without washing or sanitizing her hands. She acknowledged during an interview that she did not wash her hands after touching potentially contaminated surfaces and understood that this could transfer germs or bacteria to the food. The dietary assistant also confirmed she had received in-service training on hand hygiene but could not recall when it occurred. Additionally, the same dietary assistant used a dish rag, which was found on top of mop heads and had visible holes and stains, to remove a hot pan of bacon from the oven. The dish rag came into direct contact with the bacon, and the assistant admitted she did not know if the rag had been used for cleaning elsewhere in the kitchen. She stated she was expected to use an oven mitt or potholder for this task and recognized that the rag was not appropriate for food handling. Another dietary staff member and the dietary manager both confirmed that the bacon and cereal were considered contaminated and should have been discarded. Interviews with the dietary manager and administrator confirmed that staff were required to wash or sanitize hands after touching their clothes, hair, or changing tasks, and that only oven mitts or potholders should be used to handle hot food. Both acknowledged that food touched by contaminated hands or items should be discarded. Record review showed that staff had been in-serviced on hand hygiene and safe food handling practices, but lapses in compliance were observed during the survey.
Resident Elopement Due to Inadequate Supervision and Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the resident environment was free from accident hazards and did not provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents, specifically for a resident with a history of elopement. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and was at high risk for elopement, managed to exit the memory care unit and was found outside the facility on two separate occasions. The resident's care plan noted her as an elopement risk, but interventions to prevent such incidents were not effectively implemented. On the first occasion, the resident exited the memory care unit and was found outside the building after following someone through a gate. The facility's investigation revealed that the resident had been outside for approximately one hour in high temperatures, which posed a risk to her safety. Despite the resident's history of wandering and elopement, the facility did not have adequate measures in place to prevent her from leaving the secured unit. Interviews with staff indicated a lack of familiarity with the resident's behaviors and insufficient monitoring of exit doors. The facility's delayed response to the alarm and failure to conduct a timely headcount contributed to the resident's prolonged absence from the unit. Additionally, the facility's back cameras were not operational, hindering the ability to monitor the resident's movements effectively.
Removal Plan
- 1:1 Monitoring; assess staff is required to be always within arm's reach of resident.
- Door Monitoring
- Training regarding: Abuse/Neglect, 1:1 Monitoring / Guarding of exit Doors, Elopement.
- Door Signage posted as a reminder to staff not to prop the door open.
- Elopement Assessments Completed and Care plans Updated as needed.
- The facility will conduct audits to ensure that all assessments are completed.
Failure to Update Care Plans for Catheter Care, Transfers, and Diet Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans that included measurable objectives and time frames to address the mental and psychosocial needs of three residents. Specifically, the care plans were not updated to reflect current clinical needs and physician orders. For one male resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses, including a suprapubic catheter, the care plan did not include any mention of catheter care or the updated transfer requirements, despite physician orders indicating the need for mechanical lift and two-person assistance for transfers. The care plan continued to list outdated interventions, such as assistance by one staff member for transfers, and omitted all catheter-related care instructions. Another female resident with heart failure and dysphagia had a care plan that was not updated to reflect a new physician order changing her diet consistency to regular texture. The care plan continued to reference a mechanical soft diet, even after the order and nursing notes documented the change. Similarly, a third female resident with severe cognitive impairment and significant mobility deficits had a care plan that did not reflect the current order for mechanical lift and two-person assistance for transfers, instead listing only one-person assistance. Interviews with facility staff, including LVNs, the MDS nurse, DON, and the administrator, revealed a lack of clarity regarding responsibility for updating care plans and uncertainty about who uses the care plans in daily practice. Staff acknowledged that care plans should be updated with significant changes, such as new catheters, changes in transfer needs, or diet orders, but these updates were not made. The facility's policy requires timely and appropriate assessment and care plan updates, but this was not followed, resulting in care plans that did not accurately reflect residents' current needs.
Resident Safety Compromised During Van Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident during transportation, resulting in a fall from a van. The incident involved a resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple medical conditions, including vascular dementia, type 2 diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, and muscle weakness. The resident required assistance with transfers and was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living. On the day of the incident, the transportation aide did not follow proper procedures for unloading the resident from the van, leading to the resident falling from the van onto the lift, which was on the ground. The transportation aide, who was responsible for the resident's safety, failed to raise the lift to the van's door before attempting to unload the resident. Instead, the aide entered the van from the side door, unhooked the safety belts from the resident's wheelchair, and pushed the resident backward toward the open door without the lift being in place. This action resulted in the resident falling approximately three to four feet from the van onto the lift and ground, causing a laceration and hematoma to the back of the head. The facility's investigation confirmed that the transportation aide did not adhere to the established protocol for unloading residents from the van. The aide was terminated following the incident. The facility's protocol required the aide to stand on the lift, maneuver it to the van door, and ensure the resident's wheelchair was secured before unloading. The failure to follow these procedures directly led to the resident's fall and subsequent injuries.
Misappropriation of Resident's Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of a resident's medication, specifically Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen, which was prescribed for pain management. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses including dysphagia, cerebral infarction, rheumatoid arthritis, and pain, did not receive the prescribed medication as it was not administered at all during the review period. The discrepancy was discovered when a nurse noticed a difference in color for some of the tablets during a shift change, leading to the identification of five tablets as Isosorbide Mononitrate, a medication not prescribed to any resident in the facility. Interviews with facility staff revealed that controlled medications are supposed to be counted during shift changes, and any discrepancies should be reported immediately to the Director of Nursing (DON). However, the off-going nurse involved in the incident refused to return to the facility for a urine drug screen and was subsequently terminated. The DON confirmed that the investigation into the missing medication was considered confirmed, and the incident was reported to the relevant authorities, including the police. The facility's policy on the storage of medications requires that controlled medications be stored securely and separately from non-controlled medications. Despite this policy, the misappropriation occurred, and the resident did not receive the necessary pain medication. The facility's failure to adhere to its medication storage and administration protocols resulted in the misappropriation of the resident's medication, which could have led to significant harm if the wrong medication had been administered.
Expired Medications Found in Storage Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate pharmaceutical services by not removing expired medications from the medication storage room. During an observation, two expired bisacodyl suppositories and one bag of expired Gentamicin were found in the medication storage room. These medications were intended for a resident who had been admitted with multiple diagnoses, including a urinary tract infection and bacteremia. The Gentamicin was prescribed for intravenous use but was on hold due to high lab levels, leading to its expiration. Interviews with facility staff, including LVNs and the DON, revealed that there was an expectation for nurses and medication aides to regularly check for expired medications. However, the expired medications were not removed, indicating a lapse in the facility's procedures. The facility's policy required that expired drugs be returned to the pharmacy or destroyed, but this was not adhered to, resulting in the deficiency.
Failure to Ensure Valid Physician-Signed DNR Order
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's out-of-hospital do-not-resuscitate (OOH-DNR) order form was properly completed with a physician's signature, as required by state law and facility policy. Review of the resident's records showed that although there was an order for do not resuscitate and the care plan reflected the resident or family's request for DNR status, the OOH-DNR form in the chart lacked the necessary physician signature in the designated section. Multiple staff members, including LVNs, the social worker, DON, and administrator, confirmed during interviews that the OOH-DNR was not valid without a physician's signature and acknowledged that the form for this resident was incomplete. The resident involved was an elderly female with multiple diagnoses, including unspecified dementia, altered mental status, cognitive communication deficit, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, and unspecified diastolic (congestive) heart failure. The documentation in her chart and care plan indicated her or her family's wish for DNR status, but the required legal documentation was not properly executed. Staff interviews revealed that the process for verifying and auditing OOH-DNR forms was not consistently followed, with some uncertainty about who was responsible for ensuring the forms were complete and valid. Facility policy and state health and safety codes require that an OOH-DNR order must include the attending physician's signature to be considered valid. The absence of this signature on the resident's form meant that her wishes regarding resuscitation might not be honored, as staff would have to treat her as a full code in the event of a medical emergency. The deficiency was identified through record review and staff interviews, which confirmed the lack of a valid OOH-DNR order for the resident.
Failure to Ensure Proper PPE Use and Availability for Residents on Droplet Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective Infection Prevention and Control Program for three residents who were on droplet precautions due to recent COVID-19 diagnoses. Observations revealed that staff members entered the rooms of these residents without donning required personal protective equipment (PPE), specifically face shields or goggles, despite posted signage indicating droplet precautions and instructions for full PPE use. For example, a CNA was observed entering a resident's room without eye protection, and other staff members entered rooms with incomplete PPE, such as wearing only masks and gowns but omitting face shields or goggles. Additionally, the facility did not ensure that PPE was adequately stocked and readily available outside the rooms of residents on droplet precautions. Multiple observations noted the absence of face shields or goggles in the PPE bins or carts stationed outside affected residents' rooms, even though other PPE items like gowns, gloves, and masks were present. Interviews with staff indicated inconsistent knowledge about PPE requirements and procedures for obtaining missing PPE, with some staff expressing uncertainty about the necessity of face shields and others relying on housekeeping or nursing staff to restock supplies. The residents involved had significant medical histories, including dementia, heart failure, metabolic encephalopathy, anxiety, depression, and hypertension, and were under strict isolation protocols due to recent positive COVID-19 tests. Care plans for these residents specified the need for strict isolation and adherence to CDC and health department guidelines, including proper donning and doffing of PPE. Despite these documented interventions, the facility's failure to ensure staff compliance with PPE protocols and to maintain adequate PPE supplies directly contributed to the deficiency.
Expired RN License Leads to Deficiency in Resident Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that professional staff were licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with applicable state laws, specifically concerning the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) who provided assessments to eight residents while her RN license was expired. The ADON's license was delinquent for several months, during which she performed various assessments and direct care activities, including perineal care, resident COVID-19 tests, and charting resident assessments and medication administrations. This lapse in licensure was not identified by the facility's HR department due to a misunderstanding of the process for checking licenses and a transition in the payroll system that disrupted automatic notifications. The residents affected by this deficiency had various medical conditions, including malignant neoplasm, anxiety disorders, osteoporosis, cognitive communication deficits, and other chronic conditions requiring regular assessments and care. The ADON conducted multiple evaluations such as Quarterly ADL Only Evaluations, Elopement Evaluations, Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer, Fall Risk Evaluations, and others, which were supposed to be performed by licensed RNs. The comprehensive care plans for these residents required RNs to monitor and document changes in their conditions, which the ADON was not legally qualified to do during the period her license was expired. Interviews with facility staff, including CNAs, LVNs, and RNs, revealed that there was a lack of awareness and oversight regarding the licensure status of the ADON. The HR department failed to conduct regular checks on the licensure status of nursing staff, and the ADON herself was unaware of the expiration of her license due to the cessation of mail notifications by the Texas Board of Nursing. This oversight led to the ADON performing duties that required a current RN license, potentially placing residents at risk for inadequate care and services.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 117 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 4 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Schulenburg
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paradigm At The Oak | 0.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 30 | 3 |
| Parkview Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation | 7.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Flatonia Healthcare Center | 12.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 1 |
| Monument Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 14.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Care Inn Of La Grange | 15.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 12 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Schulenburg Regency Nursing Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.