Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Monument Rehabilitation And Nursing Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with essential tremor and moderate cognitive impairment was discharged from the hospital with an order for Primidone 50 mg, 2 tablets PO BID, but the order was incorrectly transcribed into the EMR and MAR as 1 tablet PO BID. Nursing staff then administered the lower dose for several weeks, as confirmed by MAR review. The discrepancy was discovered only after a family member, contacted about the resident’s increased tremors, questioned the Primidone dosage. Facility policies requiring verification of medication orders against the MAR and monitoring for medication errors were not effectively followed, resulting in the resident receiving an incorrect Primidone dose over an extended period.
Missing immunization documentation for three residents. Surveyors found that records lacked evidence of influenza and pneumococcal vaccine education, VIS documentation, consent, or refusal/contraindication documentation for residents with severe cognitive impairment. One resident had influenza given and pneumococcal declined, another had influenza given but no VIS documentation for either vaccine, and a third had influenza refusal with incomplete pneumococcal documentation.
Failure to Document COVID-19 Vaccine Education and Status: The facility did not document COVID-19 vaccine education, consent, VIS, or vaccination status for three residents with severe cognitive impairment, including residents with dementia and other significant diagnoses. Records for these residents lacked evidence that the resident or RP was informed of the benefits, risks, or side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine, and the DON and RNC stated immunization history and consent should be verified on admission.
Failure to complete and transmit a discharge MDS for a deceased resident. A resident with dementia, HTN, hyperlipidemia, depression, dehydration, insomnia, dyspnea, hypokalemia, anxiety, edema, dysphagia, and cognitive communication deficit expired, but the facility’s MDS record showed the last transmitted assessment was an Annual MDS and the death assessment was 93 days overdue. The LVN responsible for MDS completion said the discharge MDS was overlooked and missed, while the DON stated all discharged residents should have a discharge MDS completed.
Hand Hygiene Not Performed During Medication Pass: During medication pass, an MA did not perform hand hygiene before or after administering medications to two residents. One resident had coronary heart disease, HTN, DM2, and dementia, and the other had HTN, hyperlipidemia, and dementia. The MA stated she should have washed her hands between residents to prevent cross contamination, and the DON stated hand hygiene was expected before and between residents.
A deficiency was cited due to the facility not ensuring an area was free from accident hazards and failing to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents. The report does not specify further details about the individuals involved or the exact nature of the hazards.
The facility failed to provide necessary personal hygiene services for residents unable to perform ADLs, resulting in unremoved facial hair and unclean, rough fingernails for four residents. This oversight affected residents' dignity and posed health risks, particularly for those with diabetes. Staff interviews revealed a lack of awareness and follow-through on residents' hygiene needs.
The facility failed to provide physician-prescribed mechanical soft diets to several residents, serving meals with chopped lettuce contrary to diet requirements. The dietary staff followed incorrect production records, leading to inconsistencies with the facility's policy and the National Dysphagia Diet Level 3: Advanced protocol. This discrepancy could risk residents' health.
A resident with cerebral palsy and other conditions was not provided with a physician-ordered handled cup with a lid during lunch. After the initial cup slipped and spilled, the staff replaced it with a can of Diet Coke with a straw instead of a new handled cup, despite the facility having a supply of these cups. This failure to adhere to the resident's care plan and facility policy was observed and confirmed through interviews.
The facility failed to maintain sanitary food service practices, with observations of unlabeled and improperly stored food, unsanitary kitchen equipment, and incomplete temperature logs. Items in the kitchen were found unlabeled, undated, uncovered, and improperly stored, while sanitation practices were not consistently followed. Additionally, dietary aides were observed not wearing proper beard guards, and meal trays were loaded with uncovered food items.
A LTC facility failed to maintain effective infection control practices, as staff did not adhere to PPE protocols and hand hygiene while serving meals to residents. The Business Office Manager entered a COVID isolation room without proper PPE, and CNAs and the Activity Director did not sanitize hands between resident interactions. These actions risked spreading infections among residents with various medical conditions.
A resident in an LTC facility, with a history of traumatic brain injury and requiring substantial assistance, was verbally abused by a staff member. The staff member yelled at the resident for using the call light multiple times, which was witnessed by another resident. The incident was reported by the resident's family, and an investigation confirmed the staff member's inappropriate behavior, violating the facility's policies on abuse and resident dignity.
A resident with dementia and limited mobility waited 14 minutes for assistance with her meal, violating her right to dignity. The facility's policy states that residents needing dining assistance should not receive trays until staff are available to help, which was not followed.
The facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for two residents, one with severe cognitive impairment and another with quadriplegia, preventing them from calling for assistance. Observations and staff interviews confirmed the deficiency, despite a policy requiring call light accessibility.
The facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment, as bedside tables were not cleaned daily, and residents were not assisted with handwashing before meals. Observations showed that tables were not cleaned before serving meals, and a urinal was left on a table with food. Staff interviews revealed inconsistencies in cleaning protocols, with residents reporting a lack of assistance, highlighting a lapse in hygiene practices.
The facility failed to ensure that a cook, who transitioned from housekeeping to the dietary department, received proper onboarding training and certification. The cook, lacking a Texas Food Handlers License and training in critical areas like cross-contamination and infection control, worked 11 shifts without a job description or training documentation. This deficiency could risk residents' nutritional needs and increase the risk of foodborne illness.
The facility failed to make the most recent survey results readily accessible to residents, affecting all nine residents reviewed. Observations showed the survey book was not in common areas, and residents were unaware of its existence and location. The Administrator confirmed the binder was behind the nurse's desk, inaccessible to residents. The Activity Director did not discuss the binder's location during Resident Council meetings, and residents were not adequately informed about their rights.
Medication Transcription Error Leading to Incorrect Primidone Dose
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure a resident was free from significant medication errors related to the administration of Primidone for essential tremor. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, kidney disease, urinary tract infection, and essential tremor, and had a BIMS score of 8/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. A hospital discharge order dated 12/11/2025 directed Primidone 50 mg, 2 tablets by mouth, twice daily. However, the order entered into the facility’s EMR and reflected on the MAR from 12/11/2025 through 01/07/2026 was for Primidone 50 mg, 1 tablet by mouth, twice daily. MAR review confirmed that staff administered only 1 tablet twice daily during this period, contrary to the hospital discharge order. The error was identified after a family member, who had been contacted by the facility about the resident’s increased tremors, inquired about the Primidone dosage and discovered the discrepancy between the hospital order and the MAR. The resident’s care plan, revised on 01/07/2026, documented that the resident had a medication error related to Primidone. Interviews confirmed that Primidone was being used to treat the resident’s tremors and that the incorrect dose had been transcribed into the MAR at admission. Facility policies required verification of medication name, dose, route, and time against the MAR and correction of discrepancies, as well as monitoring for medication errors and changes in dose, but these processes did not prevent or detect the incorrect Primidone dosage for this resident during the specified time frame.
Missing Immunization Education and Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure resident medical records contained documentation of influenza and pneumococcal immunization education, receipt of the vaccines, or documentation that the vaccines were not given because of medical contraindication or refusal for 3 of 5 residents reviewed. The deficiency involved Residents #14, #28, and #5, and surveyors found missing documentation related to vaccine education, consent, refusal, and immunization status in the electronic medical record and admission paperwork. Resident #14 had diagnoses including dementia, congestive heart failure, and type II diabetes mellitus, and was assessed with severe cognitive impairment on the quarterly MDS. The record showed the resident received the influenza vaccine, and the MDS indicated the pneumococcal vaccine was not received because it was offered and declined. However, the admission paperwork did not contain informed consent or a VIS for the pneumococcal vaccine, and the comprehensive care plan had no immunization-related entries. Resident #28 had diagnoses including dementia, peripheral vascular disease, and aphasia, and was also assessed with severe cognitive impairment. The record showed the influenza vaccine was given and the resident was not up to date on pneumococcal vaccination, but the comprehensive care plan had no immunization-related entries. The admission agreement stated the resident refused influenza and pneumococcal vaccines, yet the EMR did not show VIS documentation for either vaccine. Resident #5 had diagnoses including dementia, encephalopathy, and malignant neoplasm of the pancreas, with severe cognitive impairment on the annual MDS. The record showed the resident refused influenza immunization, the MDS indicated influenza and pneumococcal vaccines were offered and declined, and the admission agreement left the last known pneumococcal vaccination question blank, while the consent reflected the RP wanted both vaccines and the comprehensive care plan had no immunization-related entries.
Failure to Document COVID-19 Vaccine Education and Status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement its policy to ensure residents, or their responsible party, received education on the benefits, risks, and potential side effects of COVID-19 immunization, and to document whether the COVID-19 vaccine was received, refused, or not given due to medical contraindication for 3 of 5 residents reviewed. Resident #14 had diagnoses including dementia, CHF, and type II DM, with a BIMS score of 5 indicating severe cognitive impairment; her record showed an influenza vaccine but no COVID-19 immunization documentation, no informed consent, and no VIS for COVID-19 vaccination. Resident #28 had diagnoses including dementia, PVD, and aphasia, with a BIMS score of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment; her record contained no COVID-19 vaccination education or VIS documentation, and her care plan and MDS did not address COVID-19 status. Resident #5 had diagnoses including dementia, encephalopathy, and malignant neoplasm of the pancreas, with a BIMS score of 2 indicating severe cognitive impairment; his record also lacked COVID-19 status documentation, immunization-related care plan entries, and admission agreement entries related to COVID-19 vaccination. Review of the records for these residents showed no documentation that education was provided to the resident or responsible party regarding COVID-19 vaccination, and interviews with the RNC and DON confirmed immunizations should be verified on admission, consent and history should be completed, and education should be provided if vaccines were refused, while the DON stated a system to track immunizations had not yet been established.
Failure to Complete and Transmit Discharge MDS for Deceased Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to transmit an encoded, accurate, and complete discharge MDS for a resident who expired on [DATE]. Record review showed the resident was a [AGE]-year-old female admitted with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, adjustment disorder, dehydration, insomnia, shortness of breath, hypokalemia, anxiety disorder, edema, muscle wasting and atrophy, dysphagia, acute upper respiratory infection, dyspnea, and cognitive communication deficit. Her nursing progress note documented that she expired at 7:52 AM on [DATE], and the MDS list in PCC showed her last transmitted MDS was an Annual MDS dated [DATE]. Review of the MDS transmission warnings showed the death assessment was complete by [DATE] but was 93 days overdue. During interview, the LVN stated she was responsible for completing resident MDS assessments and said each resident should have a discharge MDS completed upon discharge; she acknowledged the discharge MDS for this resident was overlooked and missed. The DON stated all discharged residents should have a discharge MDS completed and that a death MDS was important to document where the resident discharged to and what they expired from, and to let CMS know to stop any payments to the facility. The ADM stated residents discharged should have a discharge MDS completed, but was unsure whether a MDS was needed in the event of death.
Hand Hygiene Not Performed During Medication Pass
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. During medication pass observations, MA B did not perform hand hygiene before, during, or after administering medications to two residents. The report states these failures were identified for 2 of 4 residents reviewed during medication pass. Resident #21 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted with coronary heart disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus type 2, and dementia. Resident #43 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and dementia. On observation, MA B prepared and administered medications to Resident #43 at the medication cart and then went down the hall without performing hand hygiene. Later, MA B prepared and administered medications to Resident #21 and again did not perform hand hygiene before or after the medication administration. In interview, MA B stated she did not perform hand hygiene before, during, or after administering medications to either resident and should have, and stated she should wash her hands between each resident to prevent cross contamination. The DON stated it was her expectation that MA B wash her hands during medication pass before and between residents.
Failure to Maintain Accident-Free Environment and Adequate Supervision
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified in the facility's failure to ensure that an area was free from accident hazards and that adequate supervision was provided to prevent accidents. The report notes that the environment did not meet safety standards, which could contribute to accidents occurring. Specific actions or inactions by staff or details about the residents involved are not provided in the report. No further information about the circumstances or individuals affected is included.
Deficiency in Personal Hygiene Care for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary services for residents who were unable to perform activities of daily living (ADLs), specifically in maintaining good grooming and personal hygiene. This deficiency was observed in four residents who required assistance with personal hygiene tasks. Two residents were noted to have facial hair that had not been removed, which was a source of embarrassment and concern for them. One resident expressed distress over the presence of facial hair, indicating it affected her dignity and social interactions. Additionally, two other residents were found to have unclean and rough fingernails, with one resident having a blackish substance under his nails and an odor of bowel movement. This resident had requested assistance with nail care due to his diabetic condition and vision issues, but the request was not fulfilled. The presence of rough and dirty nails posed a risk of infection and skin tears, especially for residents with diabetes. Interviews with staff, including a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), revealed a lack of awareness and follow-through on the residents' needs for personal hygiene care. The facility's policy on ADLs stated that residents unable to carry out these activities should receive necessary services to maintain hygiene, but this was not adhered to, leading to the observed deficiencies.
Failure to Provide Physician-Prescribed Therapeutic Diets
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide the physician-prescribed therapeutic diet to 11 out of 13 residents reviewed for therapeutic diets. These residents were ordered to receive a mechanical soft diet, but observations revealed that they were served meals with chopped lettuce, which is not consistent with the mechanical soft diet requirements. The dietary staff followed production records that incorrectly included chopped lettuce for mechanical soft diets, despite the recipe notes indicating that lettuce should be omitted for ground and puree texture modifications. Interviews with the Dietary Director and Registered Dietician (RD) revealed discrepancies between the facility's policy and the recipes provided by their grocery supplier. The RD stated that the facility follows the National Dysphagia Diet Level 3: Advanced protocol, which allows for shredded lettuce, but the production records and recipes were not aligned with this protocol. The Dietary Director was unsure about the policy concerning diet texture modifications and relied on production records for meal preparation. This inconsistency in following the prescribed diet could place residents at risk for choking and other health issues.
Failure to Provide Assistive Eating Device
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a resident with the necessary special eating equipment and utensils as ordered by the physician, specifically a handled cup with a lid during lunch. This deficiency was observed when the resident, who has cerebral palsy, intellectual disabilities, muscle wasting, dysphagia, and other conditions, was not given the appropriate assistive device to aid in drinking. Instead, the resident was initially given a handled cup with a lid, but after it slipped and spilled, the Activity Director replaced it with a can of Diet Coke with a straw, rather than providing a new handled cup. The resident's care plan and diet order clearly indicated the need for a handled spill-proof cup with all meals to assist with drinking abilities. Despite the facility having a supply of these cups, the staff failed to provide one after the initial cup was removed. This oversight was confirmed through interviews and observations, highlighting a lapse in adhering to the resident's care plan and the facility's meal service policy, which emphasizes the importance of providing assistive devices as ordered to ensure a respectful and positive dining experience.
Facility Fails to Maintain Sanitary Food Service Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food service safety, as evidenced by multiple observations of unsanitary conditions and improper food storage practices in the kitchen. Items in the kitchen were found unlabeled, undated, uncovered, and improperly stored, including a cut cucumber, thawing brisket, and various items in the walk-in freezer and dry storage area. Additionally, the ice machine and ice scoop receptacle were observed with debris and growth, and the kitchen prep area had uncovered food and drinks. Sanitation practices were not consistently followed, as evidenced by the presence of dried particles and grime on kitchen equipment and utensils, including the three-compartment sink, dish machine rack storage dolly, and spatula. The juice dispenser nozzle was found with a slimy buildup, and the trash cans in the kitchen were without lids. Furthermore, dietary aides were observed not wearing proper beard guards, and meal trays were loaded with uncovered food items. Temperature logs for various kitchen equipment and meal services were incomplete, indicating a lack of consistent monitoring of food safety practices. The dietary director confirmed that cleaning logs and schedules were posted, but several tasks were either undated or not completed as required. The facility's general kitchen sanitation policy emphasized the importance of maintaining clean and sanitary conditions to prevent foodborne illness, but the observed practices did not align with these standards.
Inadequate Infection Control Practices in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by multiple staff members not adhering to established protocols. The Business Office Manager (BOM) entered a COVID isolation room without donning the required personal protective equipment (PPE) such as gloves and a gown, and did not sanitize her hands before or after entering the room. Despite the presence of clear instructions on the door of the isolation room, the BOM misunderstood the protocol and failed to follow the facility's guidelines, potentially risking contamination. Additionally, the facility's Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and Activity Director did not adhere to proper hand hygiene practices while serving meals to residents. The CNAs were observed serving food trays without ensuring sanitary conditions, and the Activity Director was seen touching ready-to-eat food items and residents' clothing without wearing gloves or sanitizing hands between interactions. These actions were contrary to the facility's infection control policies and could contribute to the spread of infections among residents. The residents involved in these incidents had various medical conditions, including dementia, renal cancer, and cerebral palsy, which made them particularly vulnerable to infections. The facility's failure to enforce proper infection control measures, such as hand hygiene and PPE usage, compromised the safety and well-being of these residents, as well as the overall sanitary environment of the facility.
Verbal Abuse Incident in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from verbal abuse by a staff member. The incident involved a resident who required substantial assistance for activities of daily living and had a history of traumatic brain injury and other medical conditions. The resident was subjected to verbal abuse when a staff member yelled at her for using the call light multiple times to request assistance. This behavior was witnessed by another resident who confirmed the staff member's inappropriate conduct. The resident involved in the incident had a BIMS score indicating normal cognitive function and required assistance for various activities due to her medical conditions. During the incident, the resident used the call light to request help, but the staff member responded inappropriately by yelling and using derogatory language. The staff member's actions were reported by the resident's family, leading to an investigation by the facility. The investigation confirmed that the staff member was verbally inappropriate and abusive towards the resident. Interviews with the resident and her roommate corroborated the allegations of verbal abuse. The facility's policies on abuse and promoting resident dignity were not adhered to, as the staff member failed to treat the resident with respect and dignity, and did not respond to her requests in a timely and respectful manner.
Failure to Assist Resident with Meal in a Timely Manner
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was treated with respect and dignity during meal service. A resident, who required total assistance with eating due to conditions such as dementia and limited mobility, was observed waiting for 14 minutes before receiving assistance with her meal. The resident's meal tray was set up by the Activity Director without performing hand hygiene, and the resident was left staring at the meal tray until a staff member arrived to assist. The Dietary Director explained that meal trays are served in the order they are printed, without prioritizing residents who need assistance. The facility's Meal Service policy states that residents requiring dining assistance should not have their trays delivered until a staff member is available to assist, which was not adhered to in this instance. This oversight resulted in the resident not being treated with dignity, as she was left waiting for assistance with her meal.
Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the call lights for two residents, Resident #9 and Resident #47, were within reach, which is a critical aspect of accommodating the needs and preferences of residents. Resident #9, a female with severe cognitive impairment and a history of falls, was observed in her wheelchair with the call light hanging from a rolling table approximately three feet away, making it inaccessible. Despite her attempts to reach it, she was unable to do so, and she confirmed in an interview that she could not reach the call light when needed. Resident #47, a male with multiple complex medical conditions including quadriplegia and a traumatic brain injury, was found in his room with both the call light and a soft pad call device hung on the opposite wall, out of his reach. Although he communicated nonverbally that he did not need assistance at the time of observation, the placement of the call devices did not allow him to call for help if needed. Interviews with staff, including CNAs and the Administrator, confirmed that call lights were expected to be within reach of residents, and there was acknowledgment that failure to do so could prevent residents from obtaining timely assistance. The facility's policy on call lights, dated October 13, 2022, mandates that call lights be accessible to residents at all times to ensure they can call for assistance. Despite this policy, staff interviews revealed a lack of consistent adherence to ensuring call lights were within reach, and some staff could not recall the last time they received in-service training on this matter. This deficiency in ensuring call light accessibility poses a risk to residents who may need urgent assistance and are unable to call for help.
Failure to Maintain Clean and Homelike Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and homelike environment for its residents, as evidenced by the lack of daily cleaning of bedside tables for at least three days during the annual survey. This deficiency was observed in the cases of two residents, one of whom reported that her bedside table had not been cleaned in between meals and incontinence care, nor was she assisted with handwashing before meals. During lunch service, it was noted that residents were not assisted with handwashing, and their tray tables were not cleaned before meals were served. Additionally, a urinal was left on a resident's bedside table alongside their food. Interviews with staff revealed inconsistencies in the cleaning and handwashing protocols. A housekeeper stated that all touch surfaces should be cleaned daily, especially during the current increase in COVID-19 infections, to prevent illness. An LVN confirmed that residents should be assisted with handwashing multiple times a day and that housekeeping was responsible for cleaning high-touch surfaces daily. However, residents reported not receiving assistance with handwashing or having their tables cleaned, indicating a lapse in the facility's adherence to its cleaning and hygiene policies.
Inadequate Training and Certification for Dietary Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills in the food and nutrition service department, specifically concerning one cook, referred to as Cook G. Cook G, who transitioned from the housekeeping department to the dietary department, had not received onboarding training with the necessary competencies and skills to fulfill the functions of the food and nutrition services department. Cook G did not possess a Texas Food Handlers License at the time of the survey and had not been trained on critical aspects such as cross-contamination, infection control, time-temperature control, HACCP, recipes, and production records. Despite working 11 shifts in the dietary department, Cook G had not received a job description or any training documentation for the cook position. During interviews, it was revealed that Cook G had been trained by the Dietary Director (DD) and other cooks but had never prepared a meal independently or been left alone in the kitchen without a certified team member. The DD confirmed that Cook G was new to the dietary department and was scheduled to take the Texas Food Handlers course. The lack of proper training and certification for Cook G could potentially place residents at risk of not having their nutritional needs met and increase the risk of foodborne illness. The facility's failure to ensure that Cook G had the necessary qualifications and training was evident in the absence of training documentation and a signed job description for the cook position in Cook G's personnel file.
Survey Results Accessibility Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to make the most recent survey results readily accessible to residents, which affected all nine residents reviewed for the resident group meeting. Observations on two separate occasions revealed that the survey book was not located in common areas, and there was no visible sign indicating its location. During a confidential group interview, residents expressed that they were unaware of the survey book's existence and location, and they preferred to access it independently without staff involvement. The Administrator confirmed that the survey binder was kept behind the nurse's desk, an area not accessible to residents, and acknowledged that residents have the right to view the survey binder without needing to ask for it. The Activity Director admitted that the survey binder's location and availability were not discussed during Resident Council meetings, and she was unaware of its location. The facility's policy on Resident Rights, dated November 2021, indicated that residents should be informed of state survey reports and the facility's plan of correction. However, the Activity Director did not specify which resident rights were reviewed during meetings, and residents were not adequately informed about their rights, potentially affecting their quality of life at the facility.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 101 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 10 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near La Grange
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Care Inn Of La Grange | 1.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 12 | 0 |
| Schulenburg Regency Nursing Center | 14.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Parkview Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation | 14.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Paradigm At The Oak | 14.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 30 | 3 |
| Towers Nursing Home | 17.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Monument Rehabilitation And Nursing Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.