Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around August 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of August 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Henderson Health & Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with dementia and a history of rummaging entered the room of another resident known for verbal aggression when her space was intruded upon. Staff did not intervene in time, resulting in the aggressive resident pushing and kicking the other, causing skin tears and severe pain. The incident occurred despite care plans outlining the need for monitoring and redirection to prevent such altercations.
The facility did not provide or document required education about COVID-19 vaccination, nor did it record vaccination status, declinations, or medical contraindications for any residents. Multiple residents were not offered the vaccine or given information about its benefits and risks, and there was no evidence of education or documentation in their records, as confirmed by the DON and Administrator.
The facility did not enforce its smoking safety policies, resulting in cigarette butts being discarded into a regular trash can containing paper trash and regular trash being placed in a red metal ashtray container. There was no clear staff responsibility for emptying ashtrays, and both DON and maintenance staff confirmed the lack of designated oversight, leading to unsafe disposal practices in the smoking area.
A resident with a history of cerebrovascular disease and moderately impaired cognition was not accurately coded for an indwelling urinary catheter on the MDS assessment, despite documentation in the care plan, physician's orders, and direct observation confirming catheter use. The MDS nurse was responsible for assessment accuracy, but the error was not identified before the survey.
A resident with impaired cognition and dependence on staff for ADLs did not receive scheduled showers or shaving assistance for several weeks. Documentation and interviews confirmed that the resident was not provided with these services as required, and staff were unable to explain the missed care, despite facility policy mandating regular grooming and hygiene support.
A resident who was dependent on staff for transfers was moved using a mechanical lift sling that had faded loops and missing labels, indicating wear and damage. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent knowledge about identifying unsafe slings, and the facility's policy did not address sling safety checks. Manufacturer instructions required removal of slings showing wear, but this was not followed, placing residents at risk.
A medication cart was left unlocked and unattended at the nurses station, allowing a visitor, unlicensed staff, housekeepers, and a resident to pass by and potentially access medications. An LVN returned after about 20 minutes and locked the cart, acknowledging the risk of unauthorized access. The DON and Administrator confirmed that facility policy requires medication carts to be locked when unattended.
Two CNAs failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions and proper hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to a resident with a feeding tube, including not wearing gowns, not changing gloves appropriately, and handling clean items with soiled gloves, despite having received training on infection control protocols.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and hemiplegia was found to be living in an unclean environment, with soiled bed linens, dusty window blinds, and a dirty floor. Despite facility policies requiring daily cleaning and staff claims that rooms were cleaned each day, observations showed persistent uncleanliness. Delays in laundry processing and inconsistent cleaning practices contributed to the ongoing deficiency.
A CNA failed to honor a resident's right to dignity and self-determination by speaking in a loud, harsh tone and disregarding the resident's expressed wish not to get out of bed. The resident, who had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with ADLs, was subjected to care that did not align with his care plan or facility policy, as confirmed by witness statements from a roommate and a medication aide.
The facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program, leading to multiple deficiencies. An LVN did not change gloves after foley care and touched clean surfaces, while two CNAs did not wash or sanitize hands during and after foley catheter care. These lapses in protocol were acknowledged by the staff, who admitted the risk of infection due to improper hand hygiene.
The facility failed to maintain resident dignity by conducting a foot assessment in a public dining area and did not provide essential hygiene supplies to a resident, leading to inadequate personal care and potential health risks.
The facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment for a resident, as observations revealed a bathroom with a foul-smelling substance, no soap or paper towels, and a soiled brief in the trash can. Interviews indicated inconsistent housekeeping practices and concerns from the resident's family member.
The facility failed to develop and implement baseline care plans within 48 hours of admission for two residents, one with severe cognitive impairment and another with dementia and other medical conditions. This deficiency was acknowledged by the DON and Administrator, who admitted the plans were only completed after surveyor intervention.
The facility failed to update a resident's care plan to reflect their DNR status, despite having a physician's order and signed paperwork. The care plan continued to list the resident as a full code, leading to potential risks of inappropriate care. Staff interviews revealed that the social worker responsible for the update did not make the necessary changes due to being busy.
The facility failed to ensure a resident's seat belt was buckled during transport, leading to the resident sliding out of the wheelchair and sustaining injuries. Additionally, the facility did not ensure the safe transfer of another resident, resulting in unsafe handling and potential risk of injury. Staff admitted to not following proper procedures, and the facility's policies were not adhered to.
The facility failed to ensure medication carts on two halls were locked while not in use, leading to potential unauthorized access. Staff were observed leaving carts unlocked while administering medications, contrary to facility policy.
Failure to Prevent Resident-to-Resident Physical Abuse
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to protect a resident from physical abuse by another resident. One resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of rummaging behaviors entered the room of another resident who had dementia, cognitive communication deficits, and a known history of verbal aggression when her personal space was intruded upon. The care plan for the resident with a history of aggression included interventions such as early intervention and redirection when agitation was observed, but there was no prior documentation of physical aggression. On the day of the incident, staff were present in the hallway but did not prevent the altercation. The resident with cognitive impairment entered the shared bathroom area, which was considered personal space by the other resident. Within one to two minutes, staff heard a yell and discovered that the resident with a history of verbal aggression had pushed the other resident to the floor and kicked her, resulting in two skin tears and severe pain. Staff interviews confirmed that monitoring and redirection of residents to prevent entry into others' rooms was an expected responsibility, but this was not effectively carried out at the time of the incident. The incident was witnessed by staff, and immediate assessments revealed injuries to the resident who was pushed and kicked. Both residents were unable to recall the incident due to their cognitive impairments. Prior to this event, the aggressive resident had not exhibited physical aggression, but staff were aware of her verbal aggression and the need to monitor and redirect residents to prevent such altercations. The failure to adequately supervise and intervene led to the occurrence of physical abuse.
Failure to Provide and Document COVID-19 Vaccine Education and Status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement its policy regarding COVID-19 immunization education and documentation for all residents. Specifically, there was no evidence that residents or their responsible parties received education about the benefits, risks, or potential side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine. Additionally, there was no documentation indicating whether residents received the vaccine, declined it, or were exempt due to medical contraindications. This deficiency was identified through record reviews and interviews, which revealed that neither education nor offers of vaccination were documented for any of the 74 residents, including those specifically reviewed for immunization status. Record reviews for several residents showed that none had physician orders for COVID-19 vaccination, and immunization audit reports indicated that these residents and their representatives were not offered the vaccine or provided with education since their admission or for extended periods. The facility's documentation did not include any forms or records of declination, education, or consent related to COVID-19 immunization. The Director of Nursing (DON), who also served as the Infection Preventionist, confirmed during interviews that there was no documentation of education or refusal for any resident and that no declination forms were in use or scanned into the electronic system. The Administrator corroborated that no education or documentation had been provided regarding COVID-19 vaccinations for any resident in the past two years, citing lack of interest and refusals from residents or families. The facility's policy required that residents and staff be educated about the vaccine and that documentation reflect the education provided and the vaccination status, but these steps were not followed or recorded for any resident.
Failure to Enforce Smoking Safety Policies and Proper Disposal of Smoking Materials
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to formulate, adopt, and enforce effective policies regarding smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety, specifically in relation to the management of cigarette butts and trash in the designated smoking area. Observations revealed that a red metal ashtray container contained paper trash, and a metal trash can with a clear plastic liner was filled with cigarette butts, cigarette boxes, and regular trash. There was no designated staff member responsible for emptying the ashtrays, and both the Director of Nursing (DON) and the maintenance staff confirmed that the responsibility was unclear, with staff who accompanied residents to smoke expected to empty the ashtrays. The maintenance staff acknowledged that disposing of ashtray contents in regular trash cans and placing regular trash in the red metal ashtray container both constituted fire hazards. Review of the facility's smoking policy indicated an intent to provide a safe and healthy environment, but the observed practices did not align with this policy.
Inaccurate MDS Assessment Coding for Indwelling Catheter
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected a resident's clinical status. Specifically, for one resident with a diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease and moderately impaired cognition, the comprehensive MDS assessment did not indicate the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter, despite multiple sources confirming its use. The resident's face sheet, care plan, and physician's order summary all documented the presence of a urinary catheter, and direct observation confirmed the resident had a Foley catheter in place. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the MDS nurse was responsible for the accuracy of MDS assessments, and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the care plan accurately reflected the resident's needs, but the MDS was not coded correctly. The inaccurate coding of the MDS assessment was not identified prior to the survey, and the facility's policy requires comprehensive and accurate assessments according to federal regulations.
Failure to Provide Scheduled ADL Care for Dependent Resident
Penalty
Summary
A resident with a history of cerebral infarction and moderately impaired cognition, who was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) such as bathing and personal hygiene, did not receive scheduled showers or shaving assistance over a period of several weeks. Documentation and interviews revealed that from mid-April to early May, there were no records of the resident receiving a shower or shave, despite being scheduled for these services twice weekly. The resident reported not having been offered a shower or shave and expressed a desire to be clean and free of odors. Observations confirmed the resident had long facial hair and a faint urine odor, and staff interviews indicated that ADL care tasks were marked as 'not applicable' in the electronic system, signifying they were not completed. Staff, including CNAs and nurses, acknowledged the resident had not received proper ADL care and could not provide reasons for the missed care. The DON and Administrator both noted the lack of documentation for showers and shaves, attributing it to possible documentation errors, but could not confirm that the care was actually provided. The facility's policy required essential ADL services to maintain grooming and hygiene, but these were not delivered as scheduled for the resident in question.
Failure to Remove Damaged Mechanical Lift Sling from Service
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible for a resident who was dependent on staff for transfers. A male resident with hypotension and muscle weakness, who required two staff for transfers and had intact cognitive status, was observed being transferred using a mechanical lift. During this transfer, the mechanical lift sling used had faded loops and missing labels, indicating wear and damage. The facility did not remove this worn and damaged sling from service. Interviews with staff revealed inconsistent knowledge and practices regarding the identification and removal of unsafe slings. Some staff checked for broken hooks or loops but were unaware that faded colors also indicated wear. Others acknowledged the difficulty in identifying fading due to the variety of sling colors. The facility's policy on hydraulic lifts did not address safety checks for lift slings, and manufacturer instructions specified that slings with signs of wear or improper laundering, such as color fading, should be immediately removed from use. This deficiency placed residents at risk of injury.
Medication Cart Left Unlocked and Unattended
Penalty
Summary
A medication cart located on hall two was observed multiple times to be left unlocked and unattended at the nurses station. During a series of observations, the unlocked cart was passed by a visitor, two unlicensed staff members (CNAs), two housekeepers, and a resident, all of whom had the opportunity to access the medications inside. The cart remained unsecured for at least 20 minutes until LVN C returned and locked it. LVN C acknowledged that leaving the cart unlocked could result in drug diversion or harm if accessed by unauthorized individuals, including confused residents. Interviews with the Administrator and the DON confirmed that it is facility policy for medication carts to be locked when unattended and that only authorized personnel should have access. The facility's Medication Storage policy also requires all drugs and biologicals to be stored in locked compartments and only accessible to authorized staff. The failure to secure the medication cart was attributed to LVN C, who had been employed at the facility for two weeks and had two years of nursing experience.
Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions and Hand Hygiene During Incontinent Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for one resident and two staff members. Specifically, two CNAs did not follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and proper hand hygiene protocols while providing incontinent care to a resident who required EBP due to a feeding tube. Both CNAs failed to wear gowns as indicated by the EBP signage on the resident's door. During care, one CNA continued to wear soiled gloves while turning the resident and handling clean items, while the other CNA changed gloves without performing hand hygiene. Additionally, one CNA left the resident's room with soiled gloves on, further breaching infection control protocols. The resident involved was a male with a history of cerebral infarction, dependent on staff for all activities of daily living, incontinent of bowel and bladder, and required a feeding tube. Both CNAs had documented training on infection control measures, including EBP and hand hygiene, prior to the incident. Interviews with the CNAs and facility leadership confirmed awareness of the required protocols and acknowledged the lapses in following established infection control policies during the observed care.
Failure to Maintain Clean and Homelike Resident Environment
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a resident's room was found to be unclean and lacking a homelike environment. Observations revealed that the window, window blinds, and floor around the resident's bed were soiled with visible dust, dirt, debris, and smudges. Additionally, the resident's bed sheets and pillowcase had scattered brown stains, and these conditions persisted over multiple observations on consecutive days. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment, hemiplegia, and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living, reported that staff did not change his bed linens or clean his room daily. Interviews with housekeeping staff indicated that all resident rooms were supposed to be cleaned daily, including wiping down surfaces, sweeping, mopping, and taking out the trash. However, housekeepers admitted to not always cleaning behind or underneath beds due to the need for assistance in moving them. Both housekeepers and the environmental services manager stated that resident behaviors did not interfere with cleaning, and the room in question had already been cleaned on the day of observation. Despite this, the soiled conditions remained unchanged over several observations. Further interviews revealed issues with laundry processing, as CNAs were bringing soiled linens to the laundry room late in the day, after laundry staff had left. This resulted in delays in providing clean linens, and CNAs sometimes had to wait for more linens to be washed before changing bed linens. The facility's policy required daily cleaning and a clean, sanitary environment, but these standards were not met for the resident in question.
Failure to Honor Resident Dignity and Choice During Morning Care
Penalty
Summary
A certified nursing assistant (CNA) failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity during morning care. The resident, who had moderate cognitive impairment and required varying levels of assistance with activities of daily living, expressed a desire not to get out of bed when approached by the CNA. Despite the resident's stated preference, the CNA responded in a loud and harsh tone, telling the resident he had to get up, and pulled the blanket off him. The CNA further attempted to assist the resident by pulling his legs to the side of the bed, again disregarding the resident's wishes. The resident reported feeling disrespected by the CNA's actions and tone. A roommate and a medication aide both corroborated that the CNA spoke to the resident in a loud and harsh manner, with the aide specifically recalling the CNA saying, "you need to get up or I'll get in trouble." The resident's care plan included interventions to encourage participation in care, explain all procedures, and respect the resident's choices, especially if the resident became agitated. The CNA's actions were inconsistent with these care plan interventions and the facility's policy on promoting and maintaining resident dignity, which required staff to consider personal choices and speak respectfully to residents. The incident was witnessed by other staff and reported to facility administration, who confirmed that the CNA's approach did not align with expected standards for resident dignity and respect.
Infection Control Deficiencies in Foley Catheter Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program, leading to multiple deficiencies in infection control practices. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) T did not change her gloves after performing foley care on a resident and subsequently touched clean surfaces, including the resident's brief, blanket, and bedside table. LVN T acknowledged that she was trained to change gloves and perform hand hygiene but failed to do so because she was nervous. This lapse in protocol was confirmed by other staff members who emphasized the importance of changing gloves and washing hands to prevent cross-contamination and infection spread. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) K did not wash or sanitize her hands when changing gloves while performing foley catheter care for another resident. Additionally, both CNA J and CNA K failed to wash or sanitize their hands after completing the foley catheter care. During the procedure, CNA J and CNA K also made other errors, such as placing the foley catheter bag and tubing on the bed next to the resident's leg and not sanitizing hands between glove changes. Both CNAs admitted to their mistakes and acknowledged the risk of infection due to improper hand hygiene. The facility's policies on hand hygiene and infection control were not followed by the staff involved. The facility's guidelines clearly state the necessity of performing hand hygiene before and after any manipulation of the catheter and after removing gloves. Despite being trained and having demonstrated competency in these procedures, the staff failed to adhere to the established protocols, thereby placing residents at risk of exposure to communicable diseases and infections.
Deficiencies in Resident Dignity and Hygiene
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure Resident #28's dignity during a dining experience when a Nurse Practitioner assessed the resident's foot callous at the dining room table while the resident was eating with other residents present. This incident was observed on 4/16/2024, where the Nurse Practitioner was seen spreading each toe of Resident #28 and discussing the callous in front of other residents. Interviews with various staff members, including LVNs and the ADON, confirmed that such an assessment should have been conducted in a private setting to maintain the resident's dignity. The DON, however, did not see it as a dignity issue, citing the resident's cognitive state and willingness to participate in the assessment at the time. The ADM acknowledged that the assessment should have been done privately and not during a meal, emphasizing the need to consider the resident's memory needs and privacy during care procedures. The facility also failed to ensure that Resident #42 had access to essential personal hygiene supplies such as toilet paper, paper towels, and soap in her bathroom. Observations on 4/15/2024 revealed that Resident #42's bathroom lacked these supplies, leading the resident to use napkins collected from meal trays for personal hygiene. Interviews with CNAs and housekeeping staff indicated that the lack of supplies was due to concerns about residents clogging toilets and sinks. However, this practice left residents without proper means to maintain hygiene, increasing the risk of infection and skin issues. Staff members expressed concerns about the potential for contamination and infection due to inadequate hand hygiene. The facility's policy on promoting and maintaining resident dignity was not adhered to in these instances. The policy emphasized the importance of providing care in a manner that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect. Despite this, the facility's actions, such as conducting medical assessments in public dining areas and withholding essential hygiene supplies, failed to uphold these standards. Interviews with various staff members, including the DON and ADM, highlighted a lack of consistent understanding and implementation of the policy, leading to the observed deficiencies in resident care and dignity.
Failure to Maintain Clean and Sanitary Environment for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for Resident #33. Observations revealed that Resident #33's bathroom had a brown foul-smelling substance smeared throughout the sink, no paper towels, no soap, and a soiled brief in the trash can. The mirror was also covered in a white film. These conditions persisted over multiple days, as noted in observations on 04/15/2024 and 04/16/2024. Interviews with the resident's family member and staff indicated that the bathroom was frequently dirty, and housekeeping was not consistently maintaining cleanliness or restocking supplies. Resident #33, a [AGE] year-old female with severe cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for personal hygiene and toileting. The family member expressed concerns about the unsanitary conditions and the impact on the resident's dignity. Staff interviews revealed that housekeeping was supposed to clean daily and restock supplies, but this was not consistently done. The Housekeeping Supervisor was not always available to check the work of the housekeeping staff, leading to lapses in cleanliness and sanitation in Resident #33's bathroom.
Failure to Implement Baseline Care Plans Within 48 Hours of Admission
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident within 48 hours of admission, as required by professional standards of quality care. Specifically, for two residents, a [AGE] year-old female with severe cognitive impairment and a [AGE] year-old female with dementia and other medical conditions, no baseline care plans were initiated prior to survey intervention. This lack of timely care planning could hinder the staff's ability to provide effective and person-centered care to meet the residents' immediate needs. During interviews, the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator acknowledged the importance of baseline care plans in guiding resident care until a comprehensive care plan is developed. The DON admitted to being unaware of the 48-hour requirement and confirmed that the baseline care plans for the two residents were only completed after surveyor intervention. An in-service training had been conducted to address the timeliness of baseline care plans, but the deficiency still occurred, indicating a lapse in the facility's adherence to its own policies and procedures.
Failure to Update Resident's Care Plan to Reflect DNR Status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan for Resident #20 was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments. Specifically, the care plan was not updated to reflect Resident #20's choice to be a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). This oversight was identified during a review of the resident's records and interviews with facility staff, revealing discrepancies between the care plan and the resident's documented wishes and physician's orders. Resident #20, an elderly male with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, Cerebrovascular Disease, and dementia, had a physician's order indicating DNR status. Despite this, the care plan continued to list him as a full code, instructing staff to perform CPR in the event of cardiac arrest. The failure to update the care plan occurred after the resident's family signed the DNR paperwork, and the social worker (SW) responsible for updating the care plan did not make the necessary changes due to being busy. Interviews with various staff members, including the Director of Nursing (DON), Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs), and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), highlighted the importance of accurate documentation of code status in the care plan. The DON acknowledged that the SW should have updated the care plan and took ultimate responsibility for the oversight. The facility's policy on advance directives and comprehensive care plans emphasized the need for accurate and timely updates to reflect residents' current choices and needs, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Ensure Resident Safety During Transport and Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure Resident #39's shoulder seat belt was buckled prior to transport, resulting in the resident sliding out of the wheelchair to the floor when the facility transportation van stopped at a stop sign. Resident #39, who had diagnoses including end-stage renal disease, pressure ulcer of the sacral region stage 4, and peripheral vascular disease, reported injuries to his knee, right arm, and buttock. Interviews with Resident #39, another resident, and the driver revealed that the driver did not secure the shoulder seat belt, leading to the incident. The driver was terminated following the incident, and the facility conducted in-services for van drivers on proper safety procedures and incident reporting protocols. The facility also failed to ensure the safe transfer of Resident #9 by CNA H and LVN I. During the transfer, the staff tilted Resident #9's wheelchair back onto the anti-tip bars with all four wheelchair wheels not touching the floor and lowered Resident #9 into the wheelchair via a mechanical lift. Additionally, the mechanical lift legs were not in the widest position while transferring Resident #9 from bed to the wheelchair. Resident #9, who had diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, unspecified fall, and morbid obesity, was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers. Interviews with the involved staff and therapy personnel indicated that the transfer was unsafe and could have resulted in injury to the resident or staff. The facility's policies and procedures for transportation and mechanical lift usage were not followed, leading to these deficiencies. The staff involved admitted to not feeling confident about the safety of the transfers and acknowledged that the procedures were not correctly executed. The facility's documentation and interviews with the Director of Nursing and the Administrator confirmed that the proper protocols were not adhered to, resulting in potential harm to the residents involved.
Failure to Lock Medication Carts
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for two of four medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. Specifically, the medication carts on hall 1 and hall 2 were observed to be unlocked while the assigned staff were administering medications to residents. This failure was observed during multiple instances where the staff turned their backs on the unlocked carts or left them unattended, posing a risk of unauthorized access to medications. During an observation, an LVN was seen preparing insulin and administering it to a resident while his medication cart remained unlocked. Similarly, a CMA was observed with an unlocked medication cart while attending to a resident in another room. Both staff members acknowledged their failure to lock the carts and recognized the potential risks associated with leaving medication carts unlocked, including unauthorized access and potential adverse reactions if medications were taken by individuals for whom they were not prescribed. Interviews with various staff members, including the ADON and DON, revealed differing expectations regarding when medication carts should be locked. While some staff believed that carts should always be locked when not in use, others, including the DON, stated that it was acceptable for carts to be unlocked if they were within the nurse's line of sight. The facility's policy, however, clearly indicated that all drugs and biologicals should be stored in locked compartments and only authorized personnel should have access to the keys, highlighting a discrepancy between policy and practice.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 76 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Henderson
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autumn Leaves Nursing And Rehab Inc | 2 mi | ★★★★★ | 20 | 0 |
| Avir At Overton | 12.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 19 | 1 |
| Arbor Grace Guest Care Center | 15 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 1 |
| Willow Rehab & Nursing | 15.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
| Oak Brook Health Care Center | 24.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Henderson Health & Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.