Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Cedar Hill Healthcare Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A deficiency was cited due to the facility's failure to keep an area free from accident hazards and to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents. The environment did not meet safety standards, resulting in the presence of hazards and insufficient oversight.
Surveyors found that frozen cinnamon rolls were left uncovered in the facility freezer, and interviews with dietary staff confirmed that all kitchen staff were responsible for proper food storage, including covering, dating, and labeling items. This failure to follow food storage policy and FDA Food Code requirements resulted in a deficiency related to food safety practices.
Multiple residents were found to have missing call light pull strings in their bathroom areas, making it impossible for them to call for assistance. Facility staff, including the Maintenance/Housekeeping Director, DON, and Administrator, confirmed that the call light strings were absent and acknowledged this as a safety concern, in violation of facility policy requiring accessible call systems.
A resident was not assessed completely and in a timely manner upon admission and at the required periodic intervals, as mandated by regulations. This failure resulted in noncompliance with assessment requirements.
A resident's care plan was found to be incomplete, missing measurable timetables and specific actions to address all assessed needs. The deficiency was identified through review of documentation, which showed the care plan did not fully address the resident's requirements or include clear, measurable interventions.
Two residents who were dependent on staff for ADLs were found with long, untrimmed, and dirty fingernails, despite expressing a desire for nail care and having no history of refusal. Staff interviews confirmed that both CNAs and nurses were responsible for providing nail care, and that the facility's policy required regular cleaning and trimming, which was not done for these residents.
A CNA failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene when moving from dirty to clean tasks during incontinence care for a resident with multiple health conditions and impaired cognition. The CNA used gloves carried in her pocket, did not change them after they became soiled, and continued care, contrary to facility policy and infection control standards.
Three residents with varying levels of cognitive and physical impairment were unable to access their call lights due to improper placement or obstruction, including one who had to leave her bed to reach the device, another whose call light string was blocked by a mechanical lift sling, and a third who could not reach her call light and had to call out for help. Staff acknowledged the importance of call light accessibility and the risks of delayed care.
A CNA failed to perform hand hygiene after providing incontinent care to a resident with dementia and muscle wasting, then proceeded to assist another resident and interact with a nurse without cleaning her hands, contrary to facility policy and infection control protocols.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment was sexually abused by another resident with a history of behavioral issues. The incident occurred when the male resident was found lying on top of the female resident, both nude from the waist down. Despite the known behavioral problems of the male resident and the cognitive impairment of the female resident, the facility failed to prevent the incident, highlighting a deficiency in protecting residents from abuse.
The facility's kitchen failed to meet food safety standards, with issues including undated food items, poor hand hygiene by staff, and a fly infestation. Observations revealed that frozen beans and cookies lacked use-by dates, and the Dietary Manager did not wash hands between tasks, using the same gloves for multiple activities. Flies were present on food and utensils, indicating unsanitary conditions.
The facility failed to maintain cleanliness in two shower rooms, with observations of debris and dark spots on floors. A resident's family member reported the Hall 200 shower room as filthy. Staff interviews confirmed inadequate cleaning practices, contrary to the facility's policy requiring daily cleaning.
The facility failed to provide adequate nail care for three residents who were unable to perform activities of daily living independently. A resident with cerebral infarction and hemiplegia had long, dirty fingernails, while another with dementia also had unclean nails. A third resident with severe cognitive impairment had dirt under his nails. Staff interviews revealed that both CNAs and LVNs were responsible for nail care, but the necessary services were not provided, increasing the risk of infection.
A medication aide in a LTC facility failed to administer prescribed medications to two residents, resulting in a medication error rate of 9.38%. The aide did not give Flonase to a resident with coronary artery disease and dementia, and failed to administer Namenda and Polyethylene Glycol to another resident with Alzheimer's. These errors were identified during a medication pass observation and confirmed by the aide.
A resident prescribed Depakote for mood disturbances did not receive monthly lab tests to monitor Depakote levels from January to June 2024, despite physician orders. The facility's change in the pharmacy system may have disrupted the lab ordering process, and the nursing staff and management failed to ensure the tests were conducted. The resident continued to receive Depakote daily, but the absence of lab tests meant the facility did not monitor the medication levels as required.
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program. An LVN did not sanitize a bottle of test strips after use, risking cross-contamination. Two CNAs neglected proper hand hygiene during incontinence care, increasing infection risk. Additionally, an MA did not sanitize a blood pressure cuff between uses on two residents, potentially spreading germs.
The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, resulting in fly infestations in the kitchen, dining room, and resident rooms. Observations showed flies on food and preparation areas, with staff acknowledging the issue and potential foodborne illness risk. Despite monthly pest control visits, measures were insufficient, and no specific actions were in place to address flies in the kitchen.
The facility failed to ensure that new hire orientation training was completed for two CNAs, CNA L and CNA M, who were hired in April and May 2024. Record reviews and interviews confirmed that the CNAs did not undergo the necessary onboarding or orientation training, aside from monthly in-services. The Human Resources Supervisor acknowledged that some staff were missing required training and stated that staff should not work on the floor until completing initial online training. The facility's policy required a 10-hour orientation program within the first five days of employment, which was not followed.
A resident with respiratory failure was not provided oxygen at the physician-ordered rate of 2 liters per minute. Instead, observations showed the oxygen flow was set at higher rates of 4.5 and 5.5 liters per minute. The resident, who was moderately cognitively impaired, reported feeling unwell and unable to adjust the oxygen flow. The ADON corrected the flow rate and acknowledged the importance of following physician orders to prevent potential risks.
Failure to Maintain Safe Environment and Adequate Supervision
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified in the facility's failure to ensure that an area was free from accident hazards and that adequate supervision was provided to prevent accidents. The report notes that the environment did not meet safety standards, which resulted in the presence of accident hazards and insufficient oversight to prevent potential incidents. No specific details about the residents involved, their medical history, or their condition at the time of the deficiency are provided in the report.
Improper Storage of Food Items in Facility Freezer
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that frozen cinnamon rolls were left uncovered in an open brown box inside the facility freezer, exposing them to frigid air. Multiple interviews with the Dietary Manager, a long-term kitchen staff member, and a dietary aide confirmed that all kitchen staff, including cooks, aides, and managers, were responsible for ensuring all food items were properly covered, dated, and labeled. The Dietary Manager acknowledged that the cinnamon rolls were improperly stored and subsequently discarded them. Staff interviews consistently indicated that all food items, especially those in the refrigerator and freezer, should be tightly covered to prevent contamination. A review of the facility's food storage policy and the FDA Food Code revealed that all food must be stored according to state, federal, and US Food Codes, including proper covering, dating, and labeling. The failure to cover the cinnamon rolls as required by policy and regulation constituted a breach in food storage practices. The report did not mention any specific residents affected or their medical conditions at the time of the deficiency.
Inaccessible Call Light Systems in Resident Bathrooms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that call light systems in resident bathrooms and bathing areas were accessible and functional for multiple residents. Specifically, observations on several occasions revealed that the pull strings for the call lights were missing in the shared toilets located inside residents' rooms for five residents. These missing pull strings made it impossible for residents to call for assistance while in the bathroom. The issue was confirmed through interviews with the Maintenance/Housekeeping Director, who was unaware of the missing strings until notified, and acknowledged the absence of the call light strings in the affected areas. Further interviews with the DON and the Administrator confirmed that facility policy requires call light strings to be present and within reach of residents at all times. Both staff members recognized that missing call light strings in bathrooms are a safety concern and that staff are responsible for ensuring the call lights are accessible and secured as needed. The deficiency was identified through direct observation, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, all of which confirmed that the required call light accessibility was not maintained for the affected residents.
Failure to Complete Timely and Comprehensive Resident Assessments
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when the facility failed to assess a resident completely and in a timely manner upon admission and then periodically, at least every 12 months, as required. The report notes that the required comprehensive assessment process was not followed according to the specified timeframes, resulting in noncompliance with assessment regulations.
Incomplete Care Plan Lacking Measurable Actions
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified due to the failure to develop and implement a complete care plan that addresses all of a resident's needs. The care plan lacked measurable timetables and specific actions, resulting in incomplete documentation and planning for the resident's care. This omission was observed during the review of resident records and care plans, where it was noted that the care plan did not comprehensively cover the resident's assessed needs or provide clear, measurable interventions.
Failure to Provide Nail Care for Dependent Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), specifically nail care, for two residents who were dependent on staff for personal hygiene. One resident, a female with diabetes, dementia, and generalized muscle weakness, was found to have long fingernails and expressed that she wanted them trimmed but was unable to do so herself. Her care plan did not address ADLs, and there was no documentation of her being resistive to care. Another resident, a male with multiple diagnoses including heart failure, diabetes, cerebrovascular accident, and renal insufficiency, was observed with long, jagged, and dirty fingernails. He also stated he wanted his nails trimmed and had previously requested this from staff, but the care was not provided. Interviews with staff confirmed that both CNAs and nurses were responsible for nail care, and that nail care should be provided on shower days and as needed, including for residents on hospice. Staff acknowledged that neither resident had a history of refusing nail care, and that the observed conditions of the residents' fingernails were not in accordance with facility policy, which requires daily cleaning and regular trimming. The Director of Nursing and other staff confirmed that the residents' nails should have been trimmed and cleaned, and that the lack of care was not due to resident refusal.
Failure to Follow Infection Control Protocol During Incontinence Care
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a certified nursing assistant (CNA) failed to follow proper infection prevention and control procedures during incontinence care for a resident. The CNA entered the resident's room, performed hand hygiene, and donned gloves that had been carried in her uniform pocket. During the care, the CNA's gloves became soiled with feces, and instead of changing gloves and performing hand hygiene before proceeding to clean areas, she wiped the gloves with disposable wipes and continued with the care. The CNA then used the same gloves to handle clean items, such as a new brief and underpad, and to reposition the resident, only removing the gloves and performing hand hygiene after completing all tasks. The resident involved was an elderly female with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular accident, and weakness, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder with moderately impaired cognition. The facility's perineal care policy required staff to remove gloves and perform hand hygiene before reapplying new gloves when moving from dirty to clean tasks. Both the CNA and the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged during interviews that gloves should not be carried in pockets and that proper glove changes and hand hygiene are necessary to prevent cross-contamination and infection.
Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility for Multiple Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that call lights were accessible to three residents, resulting in unmet needs for reasonable accommodation. For one resident with severe cognitive impairment, impaired vision, and a history of falls, the call light was not within reach while she was in bed. She reported having to get out of bed to access the call light, which was located near another bed, and stated she did not have the strength to do so. Her care plan specifically required that the call device be within easy reach and that staff inform her of the location of her items. Another resident, who was dependent for bed mobility and transfers due to hemiplegia and hemiparesis, was unable to activate her call light because a mechanical lift sling was placed on top of the call light string, obstructing her ability to pull it. Although the call light was within reach, the obstruction prevented its use, and the resident confirmed she could not turn the light on. A third resident with moderate cognitive impairment, dementia, and glaucoma was observed with her call light string too far from her bed to reach. She reported having to yell into the hallway to get assistance and expressed that it was inconvenient not having the call light within reach. Staff interviews confirmed that it was the responsibility of all nursing staff to ensure call lights were accessible and that failure to do so could result in delayed care.
Failure to Perform Hand Hygiene After Incontinent Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program as evidenced by a certified nursing assistant (CNA) not performing hand hygiene after providing incontinent care to a resident. During an observation, two CNAs entered a resident's room to provide care, both performing hand hygiene upon entry and donning appropriate personal protective equipment. After completing the care, one CNA removed her soiled gloves but did not perform hand hygiene before leaving the room and subsequently assisted another resident and interacted with a nurse without cleaning her hands. This action was in direct violation of the facility's hand hygiene policy, which requires staff to perform hand hygiene between resident contacts and after removing gloves. The resident involved was an elderly female with diagnoses including dementia, muscle wasting, and convulsions, and her care plan specifically aimed to prevent infection. Interviews with the CNA and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the expectation and training were for staff to perform hand hygiene after providing care, particularly after contact with soiled materials. The CNA acknowledged forgetting to perform hand hygiene due to being distracted by another resident's request for assistance.
Failure to Protect Resident from Sexual Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from sexual abuse by another resident, leading to a serious incident. Resident #1, a female with severe cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease and other mental health conditions, was found in a vulnerable situation. She was discovered in her room with Resident #2, a male resident with a history of behavioral issues, lying on top of her. Both residents were nude from the waist down, and Resident #2 was observed with his hand on Resident #1's vaginal area, moving his hips side to side. This incident occurred despite Resident #1's care plan indicating her tendency to wander and her need for supervision due to impaired safety awareness. Resident #2, who also had severe cognitive impairment and a history of aggressive behavior, was found in Resident #1's room under circumstances suggesting non-consensual sexual contact. Despite his cognitive challenges, Resident #2 was able to communicate and understand others, as evidenced by his interactions with staff and police. He claimed that Resident #1 had invited him into her room, although staff and police interviews indicated that Resident #1 was not capable of such communication due to her cognitive state. The facility's failure to adequately monitor and separate residents with known behavioral issues contributed to this incident. The incident was discovered during routine rounds by an agency nurse, who immediately intervened and separated the residents. The facility's records and staff interviews revealed that Resident #1 was unable to communicate effectively and was dependent on staff for care, while Resident #2 had a history of behavioral problems, including aggression and inappropriate undressing. Despite these known issues, the facility did not have adequate measures in place to prevent such an incident, resulting in a failure to protect Resident #1 from abuse.
Food Safety and Sanitation Deficiencies in Facility Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food service safety in its only kitchen, as observed during a survey. The deficiencies included the lack of use-by dates on food items in the freezer and preparation area, inadequate hand hygiene practices by kitchen staff, and unsanitary conditions due to the presence of flies. Specifically, packets of frozen broad beans and a bag of cookies were found without use-by dates, which is against the facility's policy for food storage. Additionally, the Dietary Manager was observed not performing hand hygiene between different kitchen tasks. He donned gloves without washing his hands, handled various food items, and touched different surfaces without changing gloves or washing his hands. This practice was contrary to the facility's handwashing policy, which requires handwashing before putting on new gloves and changing gloves between tasks to prevent cross-contamination. The presence of flies in the kitchen and dining areas was another significant issue. Flies were observed on food items, utensils, and in the dining area during meal service. Despite being aware of the fly problem for several months, the facility had not implemented effective measures to control the infestation, posing a risk of food contamination and food-borne illnesses to residents.
Failure to Maintain Cleanliness in Shower Rooms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and homelike environment in two of the three shower rooms reviewed, specifically the end of Hall 100 and Hall 200 shower rooms. Observations revealed blackish marks and debris in the Hall 100 shower room and dark brown spots and particles on the floor of the Hall 200 shower room. Interviews with staff, including a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN), a housekeeper, and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), confirmed that the shower rooms were not cleaned as required. The CNA stated that shower rooms were supposed to be cleaned twice daily by housekeeping and as needed by CNAs between resident showers. A family member of a resident reported the Hall 200 shower room as filthy, having seen feces on the floor and diapers left in the room. The Maintenance/Housekeeping Supervisor acknowledged that the shower rooms should be checked and cleaned at least daily, and noted that the brown spots in the Hall 200 shower room should have been addressed when first reported. The facility's policy, last revised in April 2006, mandates daily cleaning of bathrooms, including showers, which was not adhered to, leading to an unsanitary environment for residents.
Failure to Provide Adequate Nail Care for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary services for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living, specifically in maintaining good grooming and personal hygiene. This deficiency was observed in three residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with personal hygiene. Resident #47, a male with cerebral infarction and hemiplegia, had long fingernails with dark brown residue underneath. He expressed a desire for clean and short nails but refrained from informing the staff due to fear of getting into trouble. Resident #71, a female with dementia and cognitive communication deficit, also had long fingernails with dark brown residue. She required moderate assistance with personal hygiene and was unable to communicate effectively. Interviews with staff revealed that both CNAs and LVNs were responsible for nail care, with nurses specifically handling residents with diabetes. However, the necessary nail care was not provided to Resident #71, increasing the risk of infection. Resident #3, a male with severe cognitive impairment and multiple health conditions, had dirt under his fingernails. He required supervision for personal hygiene, but his nails were not cleaned as needed. Staff interviews indicated that nail care should be provided on shower days and as needed, with nurses responsible for diabetic residents. The ADON confirmed that nail care was expected to be performed regularly and acknowledged that dirty fingernails could pose an infection control issue.
Medication Administration Errors Lead to High Error Rate
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%, with an observed rate of 9.38% based on three errors out of 32 opportunities. This involved two residents and one medication aide (MA D). The errors were identified during a medication pass observation and subsequent interviews and record reviews. The medication aide, MA D, did not administer medications as ordered by the physician for two residents, which contributed to the high error rate. Resident #23, a severely cognitively impaired male with diagnoses including coronary artery disease, dementia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, was supposed to receive Flonase Allergy Relief Nasal suspension as per the physician's order. However, during the medication pass observation, it was noted that MA D did not administer the Flonase, despite having signed it off as given. MA D later confirmed that the medication was overlooked and not administered. Similarly, Resident #39, also severely cognitively impaired with conditions such as hypertension and Alzheimer's, was to receive Namenda and Polyethylene Glycol as per the physician's orders. During the observation, MA D failed to administer these medications, although they were signed off as given. MA D acknowledged not administering the Polyethylene Glycol and was unsure about the Namenda. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed that staff are required to verify physician orders and match them to the medications administered, which was not adhered to in these instances.
Failure to Conduct Monthly Depakote Level Tests
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide or obtain necessary laboratory services for a resident who was prescribed Depakote for mood disturbances. The physician had ordered monthly Depakote level tests starting from March 2023, but these tests were not conducted from January 2024 to June 2024. The resident, a male with severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses including stroke, hypertension, and mood disturbances, continued to receive Depakote tablets daily as per the physician's orders. However, the absence of monthly lab tests meant that the facility did not monitor the resident's Depakote levels as required. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the failure to conduct the lab tests was due to a change in the pharmacy system in January 2024, which may have disrupted the lab ordering process. Despite this change, the nursing staff and management, including the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), were responsible for ensuring that lab tests were ordered and conducted as per physician orders. The ADON acknowledged the oversight and identified it as a system failure, as neither the nurses nor the management verified whether the resident received the necessary lab tests. The Nurse Practitioner confirmed that the facility should have followed the physician's orders for lab draws, even though the resident was stable and the risk of not conducting the tests was considered low.
Infection Control Deficiencies in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by several incidents involving staff and residents. In one instance, a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) did not sanitize a bottle of test strips after using it to obtain a glucose reading for a resident with type 2 diabetes. The LVN carried the bottle into the resident's room and returned it to the medication cart without cleaning it, which she acknowledged could lead to cross-contamination. In another incident, two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) did not perform proper hand hygiene during incontinence care for a resident who was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The CNAs failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene after cleaning the resident and before applying a clean brief. They also did not wash their hands before leaving the resident's room, which they admitted was against protocol and could increase the risk of infections. Additionally, a Medical Assistant (MA) did not sanitize a blood pressure cuff between uses on two residents. The MA used the same cuff on both residents without cleaning it, despite knowing the importance of sanitizing equipment to prevent the spread of infection. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed that staff were required to clean equipment after each use to avoid potential germ transmission.
Ineffective Pest Control Program Leads to Fly Infestation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement an effective pest control program, resulting in the presence of flies in critical areas such as the kitchen, dining room, and resident rooms. Observations revealed multiple instances of flies landing on food and food preparation areas, including a resident's food plate during lunch service, a tray of cornbread in the kitchen, and a serving scoop used for food distribution. Staff members, including the Dietary Manager and Dietary Aides, acknowledged the presence of flies and the potential risk of foodborne illness due to contamination. Interviews with facility staff, including the Dietary Manager, Dietary Aides, and the Administrator, indicated awareness of the fly issue for several months. The Dietary Manager mentioned that flies entered through the back door and that a blower was ordered to address the issue, but it had not yet been delivered. Despite monthly pest control visits, the measures taken were insufficient to control the fly population effectively. The Administrator and Maintenance/Housekeeping Supervisor confirmed that pest control services were conducted monthly, but no specific measures were in place to address flies in the kitchen. The facility's pest control policy, revised in May 2008, stated the need for an ongoing program to keep the building free of insects and rodents. However, documentation from pest control service visits between April and June 2024 showed continued gnat and fly activity, with treatments applied in the dish pit and kitchen areas. Staff interviews revealed a lack of effective measures to prevent flies from entering and remaining in the facility, particularly in the kitchen, posing a risk of food contamination and food safety concerns.
Failure to Complete New Hire Orientation Training for CNAs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all existing staff, individuals providing services under contractual arrangements, and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that new hire orientation training was completed for two certified nursing assistants (CNAs), identified as CNA L and CNA M. Record reviews revealed that both CNAs were hired in April and May 2024, respectively, but did not complete the required new hire orientation training. Interviews with the CNAs confirmed that they had not undergone the necessary onboarding or orientation training, aside from monthly in-services. The Human Resources Supervisor (HRS) acknowledged that some staff, including CNA L and CNA M, were missing required training and that she was responsible for ensuring training requirements were up to date. The HRS stated that staff were required to complete online training before in-person training at the facility, and those who had not completed the initial online training should not work on the floor. The facility's staff development policy required a 10-hour orientation program within the first five days of employment, which was not adhered to in these cases. The lack of appropriate training before working with residents was recognized as a potential risk to the quality of care provided.
Failure to Administer Oxygen at Prescribed Rate
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for a resident, specifically by not administering supplemental oxygen at the physician-ordered rate. The resident, a moderately cognitively impaired male with a history of pulmonary hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, and respiratory failure, was supposed to receive oxygen therapy at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula. However, observations revealed that the oxygen flow rate was set at 4.5 liters per minute and later at 5.5 liters per minute, contrary to the physician's orders. Interviews with the resident indicated that he had been unable to adjust the oxygen flow rate himself and had been feeling unwell, with symptoms such as swollen and stiff hands. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed the incorrect oxygen flow rate and adjusted it back to the prescribed 2 liters per minute. The ADON and a registered nurse acknowledged the importance of adhering to the physician's orders and the potential risks of providing inaccurate oxygen levels, such as worsening the resident's breathing and increasing carbon dioxide levels. The facility's policy on oxygen administration emphasized the need for verifying physician orders and monitoring for signs of oxygen toxicity.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,006 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 45 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Cedar Hill
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crestview Court | 1.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Methodist Transitional Care Center-desoto Llc | 4.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Park Village Healthcare And Rehabilitation | 5.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 2 |
| Desoto Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 5.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 15 | 1 |
| Duncanville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center | 5.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 18 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Cedar Hill Healthcare Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.