Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Oak View Health And Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to properly store food and ensure proper sanitization in the kitchen. Observations revealed improperly stored and unlabeled food items in dry storage, the freezer, and the refrigerator. Additionally, the dishwasher was not receiving sanitizer, and the three-compartment sink was not used correctly, posing a risk of cross-contamination. Staff interviews indicated inconsistent practices and a lack of awareness regarding proper sanitization procedures.
A resident's code status was inaccurately documented in their medical record, leading to a deficiency. Despite the resident's expressed wish for DNR status, their EMR indicated Full Code, conflicting with a signed DNR order. Interviews with staff revealed inconsistencies in verifying code status, and the DON confirmed the discrepancies.
A resident with severe cognitive deficits and high fall risk sustained a femur fracture after being found on the floor. Despite visible swelling and pain, the resident was not immediately sent to the hospital. Instead, Tylenol was administered, and an x-ray was delayed, resulting in prolonged suffering. Interviews revealed a lack of urgency in addressing the injury, and the resident was eventually sent to the hospital hours later, where the fracture was confirmed.
A resident with a stage 4 pressure ulcer on the right heel developed maggots in the wound due to improper management by the facility. Despite the facility's policy to prevent infections, staff failed to communicate effectively and take immediate action, resulting in the resident being sent to the hospital for evaluation.
The facility failed to remove expired medications from storage and medication carts, as observed in 5 of 6 carts and 2 of 4 medication rooms. Expired medications, including insulin pens and various tablets, were confirmed by staff. Interviews revealed inconsistent checking of expiration dates, and the DON acknowledged issues with receiving expired medications from the pharmacy.
The facility failed to employ a certified dietary manager as required, with the acting CDM currently enrolled in a certification program expected to be completed by April 2025. The part-time RD expressed concerns about food safety due to the lack of certification and suggested employing a contract interim CDM until certification is achieved.
The facility failed to employ a qualified, full-time social worker as required for a facility with more than 120 beds. The current Social Worker Interim/Designee lacks a license or certification and also serves as the Central Supply Coordinator. The facility's administrator confirmed the absence of a licensed social worker, and multiple residents reported the lack of a social worker for some time. A Unit Manager, who does not have a social work degree, has been assisting the interim social worker due to staff turnover.
The facility failed to ensure residents had access to their personal funds, affecting four residents with varying cognitive abilities. Despite the facility's policy, residents reported being unable to access funds on weekends. The administrator admitted the receptionist responsible for fund distribution was not trained, leading to residents being unaware or unable to access their funds.
A facility failed to involve a resident with severe cognitive impairment and their representative in care planning. The representative was not contacted about the care plan, and both were unaware of its existence. Facility staff could not provide proof that the resident or representative was informed of the scheduled care plan meeting.
A resident with multiple diagnoses, including Alzheimer's disease, did not receive prescribed heel and ankle protection devices and a wedge cushion while in bed, as per physician orders. Observations showed the resident without these devices, and staff interviews revealed a lack of awareness and availability of the required items. The DON emphasized the importance of following physician orders.
A resident was receiving oxygen without a physician's order, contrary to the facility's policy requiring such orders. The resident, who had moderate cognitive impairment, was observed receiving oxygen at 3 LPM via nasal cannula. A nurse confirmed the absence of an active order for oxygen, noting that even in acute situations, an order should be obtained.
The facility failed to maintain consistent RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours daily, as required by regulation. Staffing sheets revealed missing RN coverage on specific dates, confirmed by staff interviews. Despite efforts to cover shifts using agency staff and internal adjustments, the facility could not provide documentation for the missing dates, leading to a deficiency finding.
A facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate PPE for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. Despite the policy requiring PPE for high-contact care activities, CNAs were observed entering the resident's room without donning PPE. The resident, with multiple medical conditions and a PEG tube, required such precautions. Staff interviews revealed lapses in compliance, with CNAs admitting to forgetting PPE, and the DON acknowledged the need for proper PPE use and ongoing education efforts.
The facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment in the Unit 4 shower room/toilet area, with a stained toilet and poor lighting observed. The housekeeper lacked access to the area, and the housekeeping supervisor was unaware of the issues. The maintenance supervisor was also uninformed about the inoperable toilet and poor lighting, as no maintenance request was submitted.
Improper Food Storage and Sanitization in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly store food in the kitchen, as observed during an initial tour. Several items in dry storage were found improperly stored, including cases of corn and cans of soup that were dented and not labeled. In the freezer, multiple bags and boxes of food items were unidentified, unlabeled, and undated. The refrigerator contained items such as sweet potatoes with a white fuzzy substance, indicating spoilage, and other food items that were not labeled or dated. These observations indicate a lack of adherence to the facility's policies on food storage, which require all foods to be covered, labeled, and dated. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitization in the three-compartment sink and the dishwasher. During an observation, it was noted that the dishwasher was not receiving sanitizer, and the temperature was below the required level for effective sanitization. The three-compartment sink was not being used correctly, as the sanitizing compartment was empty, and staff were not consistently using all three compartments for washing dishes. Interviews with kitchen staff revealed a lack of awareness and inconsistent practices regarding the use of sanitizer and proper dishwashing procedures. The facility's non-compliance with federal health, safety, and quality regulations was determined to have caused or was likely to cause serious harm, leading to an Immediate Jeopardy citation. The deficiency was related to the failure to use sanitizer in the three-compartment sink and dishwasher, which posed a risk of cross-contamination and potential foodborne illness among residents. The facility's policies on dishwashing and sanitization were not being followed, contributing to the deficiency.
Removal Plan
- Sanitizer for dishwasher and 3-compartment sink was properly installed by Dietary Resource.
- All dishes, pots, pans, and utensils were washed and sanitized due to the alleged deficient practice by dietary staff after education was provided by Dietary Resource.
- Every shift monitoring for signs and symptoms of foodborne illness due to potential cross-contamination was placed on all residents who take food and/or drink by mouth was entered by Unit Manager and Clinical Resource.
- All dietary staff currently working were educated by Dietary Resource on proper use of sanitizer for dishwasher and 3-compartment sink.
- All dietary staff will receive education on proper use of sanitizer for dishwasher and 3-compartment sink prior to the start of their next shift.
- Education will be included as part of the annual skills fair and new hire orientation for all kitchen staff.
- An adhoc QAPI meeting regarding the items in the IJ template completed. Attendees included the following: Medical Director, Administrator, DON, ADON, Clinical Resource, Clinical Market Lead; and included the Plan of Removal items and interventions.
- Daily audit of sanitizer detergent for proper hook up and function to dishwasher and 3-compartment sink and monitored by Dietary Manager or Designee.
- Daily audit of dishwasher to ensure the machine is functioning at manufacturer recommendations and specifications to included temperature monitoring.
- Dietary Manager or Designee will report findings and analysis of reviews to the QA&A committee monthly with additional follow-up and recommendation as needed until substantial compliance is achieved and maintained.
Inaccurate Documentation of Resident's Code Status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's code status was accurately reflected in their medical record, leading to a deficiency. The resident, who had a moderate level of cognitive function, expressed a desire not to be resuscitated, stating, "I want to die, I don't want them to save me." Despite this, the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) indicated a Full Code status, conflicting with a paper Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order signed by the resident's responsible party and a physician. Additionally, a physician's order for DNR was present in the EMR, but the care plan still reflected a Full Code status. Interviews with facility staff, including LPNs, RNs, and the Director of Nursing (DON), revealed inconsistencies in how code status was verified and documented. Staff members indicated they would check the EMR to verify code status, but the EMR showed conflicting information. The DON confirmed the discrepancies in the resident's code status and acknowledged the need to investigate further. This failure to accurately document and communicate the resident's advance directives led to the identification of Immediate Jeopardy at F578.
Removal Plan
- Resident #424 preferred level intensity was reviewed with responsible party and order was corrected in point click care (PCC).
- The Medical Director was notified of the IJ.
- A full house audit of current residents was reviewed by the Director of Nursing and validated that preferred level of intensity and signed DNR order matches the order in PCC and care plan. No other residents were identified to be affected by the alleged deficiency.
- An in-service was prepared by the DON and initiated by the Assistant Director of Nursing (RN) for all licensed nurses, medical records personnel, and social services employees. The in-service included the advanced directives policy and how to transcribe orders correctly.
- Education will be included as part of the annual skills fair and new hire orientation for licensed nurses, medical records personnel, and social services employees.
- An ad hoc meeting regarding the items in the IJ template completed. Attendees included the following: Medical Director, Administrator, DON, ADON, Clinical Resource, Clinical Market Lead; and included the Plan of Removal items and interventions.
- Changes in advanced directives will be reviewed daily clinical meeting 5x a week x12 weeks and monitored by Director of Nursing or Designee.
- DON or Designee will report findings and analysis of reviews to the QA&A committee monthly with additional follow-up and recommendation as needed until substantial compliance is achieved and maintained.
Neglect Leads to Delayed Treatment of Resident's Fracture
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident, identified as R170, was free from neglect, resulting in a serious injury that was not promptly addressed. R170, who had severe cognitive deficits and was at high risk for falls, sustained a femur fracture after being found on the floor by a CNA. Despite the resident's evident pain and the visible swelling and deformity of the leg, the resident was not immediately sent to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. Instead, the resident was given Tylenol for pain and an x-ray was ordered, which delayed appropriate medical intervention. The progress notes indicate that the resident was found on the floor at 6:45 AM, but there was no documentation of the exact time of the fall. The resident was assessed by a nurse, and a STAT x-ray was ordered, but the x-ray was not performed until several hours later. During this time, the resident remained in pain, and the facility staff failed to take immediate action to send the resident to the hospital, despite the severity of the injury and the resident's condition. Interviews with facility staff revealed that there was a lack of urgency in addressing the resident's injury. The attending physician expected the nursing staff to send the resident to the hospital immediately if there was any indication of an injury from a fall. However, the resident remained in the facility for several hours before being transported to the hospital, where the fracture was confirmed, and the resident was eventually placed in hospice care. This delay in treatment resulted in prolonged pain and suffering for the resident.
Removal Plan
- R170 was assessed by LPN. Provider was notified of findings and STAT x-rays were ordered.
- Tylenol was administered for pain by LPN.
- Follow up Tylenol administration was documented as Resident resting with eyes closed. No facial grimacing noted.
- STAT x-ray results were reported by Trident Mobile.
- Order was received to send R170 to emergency room for evaluation of fracture.
- R170 was assessed by Dr. at Conway Medical Center emergency room.
- The Medical Director was notified of the IJ.
- Residents who had a fall in the past 24 hours were reviewed. One resident was identified. Resident was assessed by Registered Nurse with no signs of pain noted.
- All licensed nurses currently working were educated by Director of Nursing Services about pain management.
- All certified nurse aides currently working were educated by Unit Manager (Registered Nurse) on the process of reporting pain to the licensed nurse on duty.
- All licensed nurses will receive education on pain management prior to the start of their next shift.
- All certified nurse aides will receive education on the process of reporting pain to the licensed nurse on duty prior to the start of their next shift.
- Education will be included as part of the annual skills fair and new hire orientation for all nursing staff.
- An adhoc QAPI meeting regarding the items in the IJ template completed. Attendees included the following: Medical Director, Administrator, DON, ADON, Clinical Resource, Clinical Market Lead; and included the Plan of Removal items and interventions.
- The Clinical Interdisciplinary Team will review falls, including pain, 5 days a week in Morning Clinical Meeting.
- Findings will be reported to QAPI committee monthly with additional follow-up and recommendations as needed until substantial compliance is achieved and maintained.
Failure to Manage Wound Leads to Maggot Infestation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly manage a resident's wound, resulting in the presence of maggots in the wound bed on the resident's right heel. The resident, who was admitted with a stage 4 pressure ulcer on the right heel, osteomyelitis, and a methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infection, was found to have maggots in the wound on October 3, 2024. The facility's policy required that wounds be managed to prevent signs of infection unless unavoidable due to the resident's clinical condition. However, the wound care provided did not prevent the infestation. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of awareness and communication regarding the resident's wound condition. LPN6 was informed of the maggots by the day shift nurse and took action to notify the DON and the physician, resulting in the resident being sent to the emergency room. LPN7, who discovered the maggots during a dressing change, was instructed by RN3 to treat the wound with Dakin's solution and dress it, but there was no Dakin's available at the time. The ADON and RN3 were involved in the communication but did not take immediate action to address the maggots. The facility's failure to manage the wound properly and the lack of immediate and effective communication among staff members contributed to the deficiency. The resident's condition was not adequately monitored, and the presence of maggots was not addressed promptly, leading to the resident being sent to the hospital for further evaluation. The incident highlights a breakdown in the facility's wound care management and communication processes.
Removal Plan
- R103 was found to be affected by the alleged deficient practice.
- LPN received report on R103. LPN notified physician of findings. Order was received to send resident to emergency room for evaluation. EMS was called and resident left the facility with EMS.
- Director of Nursing Services reviewed R103 TAR (treatment administration record). Treatment administered per order.
- An audit of all wounds was completed by Assistant Director of Nursing (RN) and Unit Manager (RN). No changes were noted to any of the wounds.
- All direct care licensed nurses received wound care education.
- Maintenance director completed facility wide observation for pests, insects, or any related issues. No issues were identified.
- Maintenance director contacted Terminix and requested an additional preventative visit and facility administrator ordered air curtain fans for all high traffic doors.
- The Medical Director was notified of the IJ.
- An adhoc QAPI meeting regarding the items in the IJ template completed. Attendees included the following: Medical Director, Administrator, DON, ADON, Clinical Resource, Clinical Market Lead; and included the Plan of Removal items and interventions.
- Wound care education is included as part of the annual skills fair and new hire orientation for all licensed nurses.
- Maintenance Director completed weekly audits of facility for presence of insects, pests, or any other related issues.
- Registered nurses on nursing management team completed weekly audits of wounds for any changes in condition.
- Findings were reported to QAPI committee monthly with additional follow-up and recommendation as needed until substantial compliance is achieved and maintained.
Expired Medications Found in Storage and Carts
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed and not stored with other medications in use for residents. This deficiency was observed in 5 of 6 medication carts and 2 of 4 medication rooms. The facility's policy on medication access and storage, as well as administering medications, requires that outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications be immediately removed from stock and disposed of according to procedures. However, during observations and interviews, it was found that expired medications, including blood collection tubes, IV catheters, insulin pens, and various tablets, were still present in the medication storage rooms and carts. During the survey, it was noted that several medications, such as Ceftriaxone IV bags, insulin pens, and various tablets, were expired and still stored in the medication rooms and carts. Unit Managers and Licensed Practical Nurses confirmed the presence of these expired medications. Additionally, some medications belonging to individual residents were improperly stored with stock medications, and certain medications were not stored according to the instructions on their labels, such as requiring refrigeration after opening. Interviews with nursing staff revealed a lack of consistent checking of expiration dates before administering medications. The Director of Nursing acknowledged issues with receiving medications from the pharmacy after their expiration dates and stated that discussions had been held with the pharmacy regarding this issue. Despite these discussions, the expectation remains that medications should be administered according to the seven rights of medication administration, which includes ensuring medications are not expired.
Facility Lacks Certified Dietary Manager
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to employ a certified dietary manager, as required by their policy and regulatory guidelines. The facility's policy, approved on 11/21/22, mandates that if a qualified dietician or other clinically qualified nutrition professional is not employed full-time, a designated director of food and nutrition services must meet specific certification requirements. However, the acting Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) is currently not certified and is only enrolled in a course to become certified by April 2025. This situation has led to concerns about food safety, as expressed by the part-time Registered Dietician (RD), who works only 8 hours per week and is not involved in daily operations. The RD has voiced concerns regarding the lack of certification of the acting CDM and has suggested the facility employ a contract interim travel CDM to provide coverage until the acting CDM becomes certified. Despite these concerns, the acting CDM is still in the process of completing an online program to achieve certification, which is expected to be completed by March or April 2025. This deficiency highlights the facility's failure to comply with staffing requirements for dietary services, potentially impacting the quality and safety of food and nutrition services provided to residents.
Failure to Employ Qualified Social Worker
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to employ a qualified, full-time social worker as required by regulation for a facility with more than 120 beds. The Social Worker Interim/Designee (SWI) confirmed during an interview that she does not have a license or social worker certification and has been working in the position for approximately one month. She also holds the position of Central Supply Coordinator. The SWI had previously held the position of Social Worker Designee for several months in the previous year. The facility's administrator confirmed the absence of a licensed social worker and stated that the facility is in the process of hiring one. During a Resident Council Meeting, multiple residents expressed that the facility has not had a licensed social worker for some time. Additionally, a Unit Manager (UM) confirmed that she does not have a social work degree and has been assisting the SWI intermittently due to the turnover of social workers in the past year.
Failure to Provide Residents Access to Personal Funds
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents who authorized the facility to manage their personal funds had ready and reasonable access to those funds. This deficiency affected four residents, each with varying degrees of cognitive impairment or intactness. The facility's policy stated that residents could manage their funds or withdraw their request for the facility to manage them at any time. However, interviews revealed that residents were unable to access their funds on weekends, contrary to the facility's policy. Interviews with the residents indicated that they were either unaware of their ability to request funds or were told they had no money available. The administrator initially stated that funds were accessible on weekends, but later admitted that the receptionist, who was responsible for distributing funds, had not been trained on handling personal funds. This lack of training and communication led to residents being unable to access their funds as needed, particularly on weekends.
Failure to Involve Resident and Representative in Care Planning
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident and/or their representative was invited to and allowed to participate in care plan meetings. The facility's policy mandates that residents be informed and involved in care planning, with meetings scheduled at convenient times and signatures obtained post-discussion. However, for a resident with severe cognitive impairment, neither the resident nor their representative was present during a care plan meeting. The facility document indicated that the resident refused to participate, and the representative attended via phone, but the representative later stated that no discussion of the care plan was offered. The resident's representative reported not being contacted about the care plan, and both the resident and representative were unaware of the care plan's existence or purpose. Interviews with facility staff revealed that invitations to care plan meetings are typically printed or mailed, but there was no proof that the resident or representative was informed of the scheduled meeting. This lack of communication and involvement in the care planning process led to the deficiency identified by the surveyors.
Failure to Implement Physician Orders for Resident Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide care and services according to physician orders for a resident, specifically regarding the use of heel and ankle protection devices and a wedge cushion while in bed. The resident, who was admitted with multiple diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and chronic kidney disease, had physician orders for bilateral heel boots and a wedge cushion to be used every shift. However, observations on two separate occasions revealed that the resident was lying in bed without the prescribed heel boots and wedge cushion. Interviews with facility staff, including a CNA and an RN, revealed that the heel boots were not available because they could not be found, and the CNA was unaware of the wedge cushion order. The Director of Nursing stated that staff are expected to follow physician orders and notify the physician and herself if orders cannot be followed. This deficiency highlights a failure in ensuring that physician orders are implemented as prescribed, potentially impacting the resident's care.
Lack of Physician Order for Oxygen Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a physician order was in place for the use of oxygen for a resident, identified as R219. The facility's policy on oxygen administration requires that oxygen be administered under the orders of a physician. R219 was admitted with diagnoses including cystitis without hematuria and had a moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 12 out of 14. A review of R219's physician orders did not reveal an order for oxygen use. However, progress notes from 01/20/25 documented that R219 was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula while lying in bed. An observation on 02/04/25 confirmed that R219 was receiving oxygen at 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula. During an interview, RN7 confirmed that there was no active order for oxygen and stated that oxygen should not be administered without an order, even in acute situations, unless an order is obtained. It was noted that the provider's note from the 4th indicated oxygen as needed, but the order was not transcribed.
Failure to Maintain Consistent RN Coverage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure appropriate Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for 8 consecutive hours daily, 7 days a week, as required by regulation. A review of the facility's daily staffing sheets revealed that there was no RN coverage for specific dates, including 11/09/24, 12/21/24, 12/22/24, 12/25/24, 01/01/25, 01/04/25, and 01/05/25. Interviews with staff members, including a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), the Director of Nursing (DON), and the facility Administrator, confirmed the lack of RN coverage on these dates. The CNA mentioned frequent staff shortages due to turnover and sickness, while the LPN and DON described efforts to cover shifts, including using agency staff and having unit managers and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) fill in as needed. The Administrator provided additional documentation of RN coverage but was unable to account for the missing dates. The DON stated that the facility always has RN coverage, even on weekends, and described the process for staffing and scheduling. Despite these assertions, the facility could not provide evidence of RN coverage for the specified dates, leading to the deficiency finding. The report highlights the facility's struggle with maintaining consistent RN staffing, which is crucial for meeting regulatory requirements and ensuring quality care for residents.
Failure to Use PPE for Resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that staff used appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The facility's policy required gowns and gloves to be available immediately outside the resident's room, and PPE was necessary for high resident contact care activities. However, during observations, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were seen entering the resident's room without donning PPE, despite the resident having a PEG tube, which required such precautions. An empty PPE bin was noted outside the resident's room, indicating a lack of available PPE for staff to use. The resident involved had multiple medical conditions, including hemiplegia, dysphagia, and a history of traumatic brain injury, and was receiving nutrition and hydration via a PEG tube. Despite the facility's policy and the resident's care plan indicating the need for enhanced barrier precautions, staff interviews revealed lapses in compliance, with CNAs admitting to forgetting to wear PPE. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the expectation for management to observe staff using proper PPE and mentioned ongoing education efforts, but the deficiency persisted as staff failed to adhere to infection control protocols during care activities.
Failure to Maintain Sanitary Conditions in Shower Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment in the Unit 4 shower room/toilet area. Observations revealed a stained toilet bowl with a dark, greenish dried substance and a foul odor, indicating a lack of cleanliness and maintenance. The shower room was also noted to have poor lighting. Despite the presence of feces in the toilet, the housekeeper responsible for cleaning the area reported not having access to the shower/toilet area due to not being provided with the necessary code. The housekeeping supervisor was unaware of the issue and confirmed the dim lighting, indicating a lack of communication and oversight in maintaining the facility's cleanliness and safety standards. Further observations showed that the maintenance assistant was seen transporting a soiled toilet, and the maintenance supervisor was unaware of the inoperable toilet and poor lighting conditions. The procedure for reporting broken equipment was not followed, as no maintenance request was submitted for the issues. The maintenance supervisor expressed surprise at the condition of the shower/toilet area and indicated plans to replace the lighting. The lack of a checklist for daily cleaning tasks further contributed to the oversight, as the housekeeping supervisor only had a checklist for monthly deep cleans, not for everyday cleaning duties.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 19 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Conway
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compass Post Acute Rehabilitation | 1.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Pruitthealth- Conway At Conway Medical Center | 5 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Angel Oak Nursing And Rehabilitation Center, Llc | 10.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Brightwater Skilled Nursing Center | 14 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Nhc Healthcare - Garden City | 15.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Oak View Health And Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.