Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Magnolia Manor - Inman during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A deficiency was cited when a resident's rights to request, refuse, or discontinue treatment, participate in or refuse experimental research, and formulate an advance directive were not upheld by the facility. The facility did not ensure these rights were protected as required.
The facility did not ensure that its services met professional standards of quality, as observed during the survey. The report does not specify the particular actions or omissions, nor does it provide details about the residents affected.
A licensed pharmacist did not complete the required monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, and the facility did not follow its own irregularity reporting guidelines as outlined in its policies and procedures.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of wandering eloped from the facility twice in one day due to lapses in supervision, particularly during shift changes. Despite known risks and existing interventions, the resident was able to exit the building, was found outside on a main road and later in a parking lot, and required staff intervention to be returned safely.
A resident with a history of agitation and exit-seeking behavior eloped from the facility twice in one day, once being found in the middle of a main road and once in the parking lot. Although staff responded and the DON and unit manager were notified internally, the required external reporting to authorities was not completed, and there was no facility investigation. Staff interviews revealed confusion about reporting requirements and a lack of follow-through on mandated procedures.
The facility did not provide documentation of a required investigation after a resident's mother alleged staff-to-resident abuse, despite policy mandating prompt and comprehensive investigations with written summaries. Leadership could not locate the investigative file, and attempts to interview involved parties were unsuccessful.
A resident requiring two-person assistance for bed mobility was being repositioned by an LPN alone during wound care. The resident slid off the bed and sustained a femoral fracture, later requiring a hip replacement. The LPN was unaware of the two-person assist requirement, and the facility's fall management policy was not followed.
A resident, who was cognitively intact and managed her own finances, gave a CNA her bank card and PIN to deposit a check and withdraw a specified amount as a gift. The CNA made additional unauthorized withdrawals totaling over $400. The incident was reported to facility staff, and the investigation substantiated misappropriation of the resident's funds, highlighting a failure to protect the resident from wrongful use of her money.
A resident with a history of diabetes and peripheral vascular disease suffered limb loss due to the facility's failure to administer physician-ordered antibiotics for a worsening wound. The LPN missed entering the antibiotic order into the electronic medical record, leading to the resident not receiving the necessary treatment. The wound deteriorated, resulting in the resident being sent to the hospital and undergoing an above-knee amputation.
A resident with diabetes and peripheral vascular disease developed pressure ulcers that were not properly treated due to a missed antibiotic order. The oversight led to the resident's condition worsening, resulting in an above-knee amputation. The facility's lack of communication and coordination contributed to the failure in providing appropriate care.
A facility failed to ensure proper storage and administration of medications for a cognitively intact resident, resulting in unsecured medications left on the overbed table. The responsible LPN left the medications unattended, assuming the resident would take them immediately, which was against facility policy. Staff interviews confirmed the oversight, and the Interim DON highlighted the importance of following medication administration protocols to prevent unauthorized access and ensure resident safety.
A resident with dementia and anxiety disorders was physically abused by an LPN after requesting a PRN inhaler. The LPN ignored the request, leading to an argument and a physical altercation where the resident was hit in the face with a phone. The incident was witnessed by another LPN, who reported it to the DON. The facility's investigation confirmed the abuse, and the LPN was placed on a do-not-return list.
The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, as evidenced by observations of roaches and other pests in one unit. A resident reported finding roaches in their CPAP machine, and staff confirmed frequent sightings of pests. Despite a policy for monthly pest control services, logs showed no activity, and the administrator was only informed of the issue on the survey day.
The facility failed to provide proper safety protocols for five residents who smoke or vape, did not conduct smoking assessments for two residents, and allowed unsupervised vaping in unauthorized areas. Staff were unsure about the smoking policy, and residents admitted to sharing vapes and vaping in their rooms.
Failure to Honor Resident Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified regarding the failure to honor a resident's right to request, refuse, or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive. The report notes that the facility did not ensure these resident rights were upheld, as required by regulations. Specific actions or omissions by facility staff led to this deficiency, but the report does not provide further details about the individual circumstances or the residents involved. The deficiency centers on the lack of adherence to protocols that protect resident autonomy in medical decision-making and participation in research, as well as the right to establish advance directives.
Failure to Meet Professional Standards of Quality
Penalty
Summary
The nursing facility failed to ensure that services provided met professional standards of quality. This deficiency was identified based on observations and review of facility practices, which did not align with established professional guidelines. Specific details regarding the actions or inactions of staff, the nature of the services in question, or the impact on residents were not provided in the report. No information was included about the medical history or condition of any residents involved at the time of the deficiency.
Failure to Ensure Monthly Pharmacist Drug Regimen Review
Penalty
Summary
A licensed pharmacist did not perform a monthly drug regimen review, including a review of the medical chart, as required. The facility also failed to follow its established policies and procedures for reporting irregularities identified during the drug regimen review process. This deficiency was identified through surveyor observation and review of facility practices.
Failure to Prevent Resident Elopement Due to Inadequate Supervision
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and prevent accident hazards, resulting in a resident with severe cognitive impairment eloping from the facility on two separate occasions within the same day. The resident, who had diagnoses including schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, conversion disorder with seizures, and moderate intellectual disabilities, was assessed as severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 4 out of 15. The resident also had a documented history of wandering and exit-seeking behaviors, and required supervision according to her care assessments. On the day of the incidents, the resident was first observed leaving the facility through a designated door and was later found lying in the middle of a main road outside the premises. Staff initially attempted to locate her after the alarm sounded, but she was not immediately found on the property. After additional staff joined the search, the resident was located and brought back inside, where she continued to attempt to leave. Later the same day, the resident again eloped, triggering alarms, and was found walking in the staff parking lot. Staff intervened and redirected her back into the building, but she exhibited combative behavior during the process. Interviews with staff confirmed that the resident successfully exited the building twice, with supervision lapses occurring during shift changes. Documentation and staff accounts indicated that the resident's risk for elopement was known, and interventions such as room supervision were in place but were not consistently maintained, particularly during critical times such as shift handovers. The facility's failure to ensure continuous and effective supervision directly led to the resident's repeated elopement incidents.
Failure to Report Resident Elopement Incidents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report two separate elopement incidents involving a resident on 04/28/25. According to the facility's policy, the Director of Nursing (DON) or designee is required to notify the Administrator and appropriate agencies, as well as the resident's legal representative, in the event of an elopement. However, documentation and interviews revealed that after the resident exited the building twice—once being found lying in the middle of a main road and once being found in the parking lot—these incidents were not reported to the required authorities. Progress notes and staff interviews confirmed that the resident, who was known to ambulate independently and had risk alerts for agitation and exit-seeking behavior, was able to leave the facility undetected on two occasions. Staff responded by searching for and returning the resident to the building, and the DON and unit manager were notified internally. The resident was later sent to the emergency room for evaluation after the second elopement, but there was no evidence that the incidents were reported externally as required by policy. Interviews with facility staff, including the DON, LPNs, and the unit manager, indicated confusion and miscommunication regarding the reporting process. The DON stated she believed the incident had been reported after consulting with the Administrator and a Nurse Consultant, who advised that the event did not need to be reported. However, no investigation or external notification was completed, and the current Administrator was unaware of the events, indicating a breakdown in the facility's reporting procedures.
Failure to Document Abuse Investigation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide documentation that a proper investigation was conducted following an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse involving a resident with cerebral palsy, adult failure to thrive, cortical blindness, and epilepsy. The incident occurred when the resident's mother, who is not permitted unsupervised visits due to a history of mistreatment, observed scratches and redness on the resident's left upper arm and accused staff of abuse. The facility's policy requires prompt, comprehensive investigations with written summaries of interviews and all documentation stored in the administrator's office. However, the facility was unable to produce an investigative file or documentation related to the incident, aside from a 5-Day Follow-up report. Interviews with facility leadership revealed that the administrator and DON were aware of the incident, but neither could locate the required investigative documentation. Attempts to interview key individuals, including the resident's mother, the LPN involved, and the resident's caseworker, were unsuccessful. The DON confirmed that law enforcement was notified and the case was closed as unfounded, but no documentation of the facility's internal investigation could be provided, as required by policy.
Failure to Provide Required Two-Person Assistance During Bed Mobility Results in Resident Fall and Fracture
Penalty
Summary
A resident with diagnoses including pressure ulcer, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and major depressive disorder was admitted to the facility and required substantial to maximum assistance with bed mobility, as documented in the resident's MDS and physician orders. The resident was specifically ordered to have assistance from two staff members for bed mobility. During a wound care procedure, an LPN performed the task alone without a second staff member present. While the resident was being repositioned on an air mattress, she began to slide off the bed. The LPN attempted to prevent the fall but was unable to do so, resulting in the resident being lowered to the floor. Following the incident, the resident reported right hip pain and was subsequently sent to the hospital, where a right femoral fracture was diagnosed, necessitating a total hip replacement. Documentation and interviews confirmed that the LPN was not aware of the two-person assist requirement for bed mobility at the time of the incident. The facility's policy on fall management and the resident's care plan were not followed, leading to the resident's fall and injury.
Failure to Protect Resident from Misappropriation of Funds
Penalty
Summary
A cognitively intact resident with multiple medical diagnoses, including hypertension, anemia, major depressive disorder, and chronic respiratory failure, was admitted to the facility and maintained control over her own finances. The resident entrusted a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) with a check for deposit, her bank card, and PIN, instructing the CNA to deposit the check and withdraw a specified amount as a personal gift. The CNA deposited the check and withdrew the agreed-upon amount, but additional unauthorized withdrawals totaling over $400 were made from the resident's account at the same ATM. The resident discovered the unauthorized transactions upon reviewing her bank statement and questioned the CNA, who admitted to withdrawing the initial agreed-upon amount but denied taking the additional funds. The resident reported the incident to facility staff, including social services and administration. The facility's policy prohibits misappropriation of resident property and requires immediate reporting of such allegations. Despite this, the CNA, who was employed through an agency, continued to work elsewhere, and there was a lack of evidence that the agency was formally notified by the facility about the incident. The facility's investigation substantiated the misappropriation of the resident's funds. The resident expressed confusion and distress over the breach of trust and was informed by the facility that the matter had been reported to law enforcement. The care plan was updated to address the resident's psychosocial well-being following the incident. The deficiency centers on the facility's failure to protect the resident from misappropriation of her funds by a staff member.
Failure to Administer Antibiotics Leads to Resident's Limb Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from neglect by not administering physician-ordered antibiotics, which resulted in the loss of a limb. The resident, who had a history of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with a foot ulcer, peripheral vascular disease, and chronic kidney disease, was admitted with a wound on her left lateral ankle and heel. The wound was documented to have moderate sero-sanguinous exudate and thick adherent black necrotic tissue. A wound physician recommended Augmentin as an antibiotic treatment, but the order was not entered into the facility's electronic medical record system, Matrix. Interviews with staff revealed that the LPN responsible for entering the antibiotic order into the system admitted to missing the entry, which led to the resident not receiving the necessary medication. The wound care MD noticed the omission during a subsequent assessment and decided to send the resident to the hospital due to the worsening condition of the wound. The resident's representative was informed of the situation and the need for hospital intervention, which ultimately led to the amputation of the resident's left leg above the knee. Further interviews with the facility's staff, including the Interim DON and NP, highlighted systemic issues with the entry and communication of physician orders. The NP noted that orders were often missed, and the wound MD's notes were not consistently reviewed or acted upon. The facility's administrator was unaware of the ongoing issues and expressed intentions to improve communication and oversight of wound care management. The deficiency was identified as Immediate Jeopardy, indicating a serious threat to the resident's health and safety.
Removal Plan
- An audit of notes from the wound physician's current resident list was completed by The Director of Nursing/Designee to identify new physician orders.
- An audit of medication administration was completed by the Director of Nursing/Designee for medications and treatments to identify missed medications and/or treatments.
- Licensed nurses were reeducated on Abuse and Neglect, transcribing and following physician orders including notifying responsible party of new orders by the Director of Nursing/Designee.
- Licensed Nurses not receiving this education will receive prior to their next scheduled shift and this will be completed in New Hire and agency orientation.
- Director of Nursing/Designee will review wound physician's notes in clinical morning meeting Monday - Friday to validate recommend orders have been transcribed, implemented, responsible party notified, and care plan updated.
- Director of Nursing/Designee will review wound physician's notes in clinical morning meeting Monday - Friday to validate updated wound measurements have been documented in the medical record, responsible party notified and care plan updated.
- These weekly audits will be monitored by the Administrator and brought for review to the next Quality Assurance and Performance Committee meeting for recommendations and this will continue for additional months.
- Ad Hoc QAPI will be held.
- The Medical Director was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy.
Failure to Administer Antibiotic Leads to Resident's Limb Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment for a resident's pressure ulcer, which led to a significant deterioration of the resident's condition. The resident, who had a history of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Chronic Kidney Disease, developed wounds on her left heel and lateral ankle. Despite a recommendation from a wound physician to administer Augmentin, an antibiotic, the order was not entered into the facility's electronic medical record system, resulting in the resident not receiving the necessary medication. The oversight occurred because the Licensed Practical Nurse responsible for entering the orders into the system missed the antibiotic order. This lapse was not identified until the wound care physician noticed the absence of the order during a subsequent assessment. By this time, the resident's wound had worsened, showing signs of infection and deterioration, which necessitated the resident's transfer to a local hospital for further treatment. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of communication and coordination between the wound care physician, the nursing staff, and the facility's electronic medical record system. The Nurse Practitioner and Interim Director of Nursing were unaware of the missed order until the situation had escalated. The resident's condition deteriorated to the point where an above-knee amputation of the left leg was required, highlighting the severe impact of the facility's failure to adhere to professional standards of practice in wound care management.
Removal Plan
- An audit of notes from the wound physician's current resident list was completed by The Director of Nursing/Designee to identify new physician orders.
- An audit of current wound treatment orders and wound physician notes will be completed by the Director of Nursing/designee to validate wound treatments have been implemented as recommended by wound physician.
- An audit of medication administration was completed by the Director of Nursing/Designee for medications and treatments to identify missed medications and/or treatments.
- Licensed nurses were reeducated on Abuse and Neglect, transcribing and following physician orders including notifying responsible party of new orders by the Director of Nursing/Designee.
- Licensed nurses will receive reeducation on wound care by the Director of Nursing/Designee including: Transcribing physician wound treatment orders from wound physician notes, Providing treatment and care per physician's order.
- Licensed Nurses not receiving this education will receive prior to their next scheduled shift and this will be completed in New Hire and agency orientation.
- Director of Nursing/Designee will review wound physician's notes in clinical morning meeting Monday-Friday to validate any recommended orders have been transcribed, implemented, responsible party notified, and care plan updated.
- Director of Nursing/Designee will review wound physician's notes in clinical morning meeting Monday-Friday to validate updated wound measurements have been documented in the medical record, responsible party notified, and care plan updated.
- These weekly audits will be monitored by Administrator and brought for review to the next Quality Assurance and Performance Committee meeting for recommendations and this will continue for additional months.
- Ad Hoc QAPI will be held.
- The Medical Director was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy.
Failure to Secure and Administer Medications Properly
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper storage and administration of medications for a resident, identified as R15, who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15. The resident's medications were found unsecured on the overbed table in his room, including multiple-colored pills and a light brown liquid in clear medicine cups, as well as other medications in boxes and packages. This was observed during an initial tour of the resident's room, and it was noted that there was no physician order for self-administration of medication for R15. The facility's policy requires medications to be stored securely and administered by authorized staff, with the staff member remaining with the resident until the medication is taken. However, LPN3, who was responsible for R15, left the medications at the bedside, assuming the resident would take them immediately. LPN3 admitted to being sidetracked and acknowledged that leaving medications unattended was against policy, as it posed a risk of other individuals accessing them. Interviews with staff, including CNA1 and LPN2, confirmed the presence of the medications on the overbed table and the lack of immediate action to secure them. The Interim DON emphasized the importance of following the facility's medication administration policy, which includes ensuring medications are taken in the presence of staff to prevent issues such as choking or unauthorized access by other residents. The deficiency was identified due to the failure to adhere to these established protocols, resulting in unsecured medications in the resident's room.
Resident Abuse by LPN in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident, identified as R2, from physical abuse by an LPN, identified as LPN2. The incident occurred when R2, who has a history of dementia with moderate anxiety, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and dysphasia, approached the nurses' station requesting her PRN inhaler. LPN2 ignored R2's requests and did not check the medical records or medication carts to verify the prescription. This led to an argument between R2 and LPN2, during which R2 attempted to call 911 using the phone at the nurses' station. As R2 tried to use the phone, LPN2 attempted to take it away, resulting in a physical altercation where R2 hit LPN2 in the face with the phone. In retaliation, LPN2 hit R2 back in the face with the phone. This incident was witnessed by another LPN, identified as LPN1, who intervened to deescalate the situation and later reported the incident to the Director of Nursing (DON). LPN1 also noted that LPN2 had a history of behavioral issues and had been previously terminated from the facility for similar reasons. The facility's investigation confirmed the abuse allegation, and LPN2 was placed on a do-not-return list. The DON assessed R2 and found no injuries from the incident. Law enforcement was notified and confirmed the abuse through interviews with R2 and LPN1. The facility's policy prohibits abuse, neglect, and mistreatment, but the incident revealed a failure to adhere to these standards, resulting in the substantiated abuse of R2.
Pest Control Deficiency in Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, as evidenced by multiple observations and interviews indicating the presence of pests in one of the four units. During an observation, a roach-like insect was seen on a CPAP machine, and multiple roach-like insects were observed scattering when a nurse accidentally hit a water machine. Additionally, a dead spider was found on a window sill, and a waterbug-like insect was seen at the nurses' station. Despite the facility's policy stating that a contracted pest elimination service would provide monthly services, the pest control logs showed no activity, and staff interviews revealed frequent sightings of roaches. Interviews with residents and staff further highlighted the extent of the pest issue. A resident reported finding six roaches in their CPAP machine, while a housekeeper and a CNA mentioned seeing roaches in various rooms and throughout the day. The maintenance staff acknowledged that food stored in residents' nightstands contributed to the problem and stated that pest control services were scheduled monthly, with additional visits available if needed. However, the administrator was only made aware of the issue on the day of the survey, indicating a lack of communication and timely response to the pest problem.
Failure to Enforce Smoking Policy and Conduct Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide proper safety protocols for five residents who smoke or vape, specifically Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. The facility did not conduct smoking assessments for Residents 4 and 5. Residents were observed smoking vapes in unauthorized areas and sharing vapes with other residents. The facility's policy, which prohibits smoking inside the building and requires supervision and designated smoking areas, was not followed. Additionally, there was no documentation of smoking assessments for some residents, and staff were unsure about the facility's smoking policy. Resident 1 was caught vaping in his room and admitted to sharing the vape with his roommate. Resident 2 was observed vaping unsupervised in the courtyard. Resident 3 stated that a nurse had previously allowed smoking in the bathroom, and that residents were allowed to keep vapes on their person. Resident 4 admitted to vaping and keeping the vape locked in a book bag. Resident 5 revealed that she and her roommate vape in the facility and that a staff member buys vapes for them. The Director of Nursing was unaware of Residents 4 and 5 vaping and confirmed that smoking assessments were not completed for them. Interviews with staff and residents revealed inconsistencies in the enforcement of the smoking policy. Some staff members were unsure about the facility's smoking policy, and residents were found to be vaping in unauthorized areas. The facility's failure to conduct proper smoking assessments and enforce the smoking policy led to the identification of Immediate Jeopardy, which was later addressed with a removal plan.
Removal Plan
- Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5 smoking assessments were completed.
- Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5 turned in their smoking material to the nurse for secure storage.
- The Administrator reviewed with the identified residents the smoking policy including: All residents are prohibited from keeping any type of smoking materials, including electronic cigarette vapes in their rooms or on their person. These materials must be turned into a nurse for secured storage.
- Residents may only smoke/vape in designated areas that have been approved and identified as a designated smoking area.
- Residents will be supervised by facility staff while smoking/vaping during the entirety of the time.
- Assigned facility staff will accompany residents wishing to smoke/vape to the designated smoking area at the times outlined in the smoking schedule.
- No other person, including but not limited to residents, families and visitors may directly provide smoking materials including vapes to any resident.
- Designated staff members, Social Services and Activity staff, may purchase, using the resident's personal funds, smoking material/vapes for residents allowed to smoke as requested. Facility will keep a log for each resident on what is purchased and kept in the secured area. Receipts will be kept for record keeping and reconciliation.
- Residents currently residing in the facility were asked by facility leadership if they currently use vapes or are smokers.
- An additional 11 residents identified as smokers/vapers.
- Those 11 self-identified as smokers, including the use of vapes will have a smoking acuity (assessments) completed by a licensed nurse to determine any additional supervision the resident may require when smoking/vaping.
- The Administrator will review with the residents, that have self-identified as smoker/vapers, and Facility Staff the smoking guidelines policy including: All residents are prohibited from keeping any type of smoking materials, including electronic cigarette vapes in their rooms or on their person. These materials must be turned into a nurse for secured storage.
- Residents may only smoke/vape in designated areas that have been approved and identified as designated smoking area.
- Residents will be supervised by facility staff while smoking/vaping during the entirety of the time.
- Assigned facility staff will accompany residents wishing to smoke/vape to the designated smoking area at the times outlined in the smoking schedule.
- No other person, including but not limited to residents, families and visitors may directly provide smoking materials including vapes to any resident.
- Designated staff members, social Services and Activity staff, may purchase from the resident's personal funds, smoking material/vapes for residents allowed to smoke as requested. Facility will keep a log for each resident on what is purchased and kept in the secured area. Receipts will be kept for record keeping and reconciliation.
- Residents who had smoking materials have turned in those smoking materials to the nurse for storage in a secured area.
- Smoking Cessation products will be offered to any resident that has identified as a smoker. If they chose to utilize smoking cessation products, the physician will be notified and orders obtained.
- Any staff not receiving this smoking guidelines policy education will receive prior to working the next scheduled shift. This will be presented in New Hire Orientation and for agency staff.
- The Director of Nursing will validate in clinical meeting that Smoking Acuity (Assessment) has been completed for newly admitted residents identifying as a smoker/vaper.
- The Director of Nursing will randomly interview a minimum of 2 staff and 2 interviewable residents weekly times 4 weeks then monthly for 2 additional months to validate understanding and compliance with the smoking guidelines.
- Administrator/designee will round in resident rooms to validate there are no smoking materials in residents' rooms or on their persons.
- Any concerns will be addressed at time of discovery.
- The Medical Director was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy.
- Ad Hoc Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Meeting was held to discuss contents of this plan.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 81 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 10 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Inman
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lake Emory Post Acute Care | 0.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Inman Healthcare | 0.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Golden Age Operations | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Rosecrest Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center | 3.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Valley Falls Terrace | 6.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Magnolia Manor - Inman.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.