Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at New Hope Retirement & Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident who had a physician's order for BIPAP with oxygen at 3 LPM during sleep and naps was repeatedly observed resting in bed without the BIPAP machine in use, and the mask was left on the bedside table. An RN confirmed the resident should have been using the BIPAP during naps, but the order was not followed.
The facility did not ensure that all dietary staff received required training in safe food handling practices for the prevention of foodborne illness. When surveyors requested verification of food handler training, the administrator could only provide certificates for five of seven dietary employees and acknowledged that one cook and one dietary aide had not completed the required training. Meals prepared and served by the dietary department were provided to dozens of residents, but two staff members involved in food service lacked documented safe food handling education.
Surveyors found that during a noon meal service, the kitchen served a different entrée and side dishes than those listed on the posted weekly menu, while still serving the same dessert and bread item. The administrator reported that 37 residents received nutrition from the kitchen for this meal. Although facility policy required that any menu substitutions be recorded on a substitution form along with the reason for the change, the dietary manager stated that items were substituted because the planned foods were not available and acknowledged that substitutions and reasons were not documented and that they were unaware of any substitution form.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to follow food safety and sanitation standards, including storing expired coleslaw and cottage cheese, keeping unlabeled juice in the refrigerator, and not consistently documenting refrigerator and freezer temperatures. Freezers lacked visible thermometers, and the food preparation and dry storage floors were damaged, rough, and had debris and dark buildup, with boxes of apple juice stored directly on the floor. A cook prepared lunch without checking or recording final food temperatures and reported not knowing this was required, while the dietary manager confirmed there was no process or log for cooked food temperatures despite policies requiring labeling, dating, and use of a thermometer for internal temperatures.
An allegation of abuse involving a resident with dementia and behavioral disturbances was not reported to the state agency within the required timeframe. The administrator conducted an internal investigation but decided not to submit an incident report, resulting in a failure to comply with mandatory reporting policies.
A resident’s quarterly assessment was inaccurately coded to show that the resident was receiving anticoagulant therapy, while the corresponding medication administration record for the same period showed no anticoagulant medications ordered or administered. During interview, the MDS coordinator confirmed the resident was not on anticoagulation and that the assessment coding was erroneous.
Surveyors observed that the medication storage room contained multiple expired items, including syringes with needles, lubricating jelly packets and tubes, and bisacodyl suppositories. An RN present during the observation acknowledged that these expired medications and supplies should have been removed. The facility had 37 residents at the time, and the deficiency centered on the failure to ensure timely removal of expired drugs and related supplies from the medication room.
Surveyors found that the facility did not fully implement its Legionella water management program as part of its infection prevention and control efforts. The written policy required a water management team that included the infection preventionist, administrator, medical director or designee, director of maintenance, and director of environmental services, along with a detailed water system diagram and identification of areas prone to waterborne bacteria. Record review showed a 2025 shower head cleaning schedule with quarterly entries for three quarters but no documentation for the fourth quarter. In interviews, the infection preventionist reported not knowing they were part of the water management team, and the administrator acknowledged the absence of a required water system diagram and missing October documentation, while noting that 37 residents were residing in the facility.
Surveyors observed multiple ceiling tiles with brown water stains and sagging in the dining room and several resident rooms, caused by persistent roof leaks that occurred during rain. The maintenance supervisor and administrator confirmed the roof had not been permanently repaired, despite management's awareness of the issue, resulting in a failure to maintain a safe, clean, and homelike environment as required by facility policy.
A resident with urinary retention and a congenital bladder neck obstruction, who had an indwelling urinary catheter and physician orders for regular catheter care, did not have a comprehensive care plan developed for catheter care and maintenance. The absence of this care plan was confirmed by the MDS coordinator.
A resident with non-Alzheimer's dementia and intact cognition engaged in abusive behavior toward another resident, including physical contact and attempting to tie a neck pillow around the other resident's neck. Although the incident was reported and immediate supervision was provided, the resident's care plan was not updated to reflect the new behaviors or interventions, contrary to facility policy.
A resident with an indwelling urinary catheter exhibited odorous brown drainage at the catheter entry site over several days, as documented by nursing staff. Despite physician orders to monitor and report signs of infection, there was no documentation that the physician was notified. The resident was later hospitalized for a complicated UTI and hypotension.
The facility did not post complete staffing information as required. Observations revealed that the whiteboard at the nursing station lacked the facility name, projected staffing hours, and actual staffing hours, only showing the date, census, and staff/title. The DON was unaware of the specific requirements for staffing documentation.
The facility failed to date and cover urinary catheter bags for two residents, leading to a deficiency. One resident with overactive bladder, paraplegia, and a stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer was observed with an undated and uncovered catheter bag. Another resident with urine retention and congenital bladder neck obstruction was repeatedly observed with an undated and uncovered catheter bag. The DON confirmed the deficiency.
The facility failed to document physician's orders for DNR status for three residents, despite having DNR care plans and signed consent forms. The MDS coordinator was unaware of the requirement for a physician's order, resulting in the oversight.
The facility failed to notify the physician of out-of-parameter blood sugar levels for two residents with diabetes. One resident had a blood sugar of 458, and another had multiple instances of blood sugar levels exceeding 400, yet there was no documentation of physician notification. Staff interviews confirmed that the physician should have been notified, and the lack of documentation indicated this did not occur.
The facility failed to ensure accurate assessments for two residents. One resident was incorrectly documented as taking an anticoagulant instead of an antiplatelet medication, due to an error in the auto-populated medication section. Another resident's admission assessment failed to document their hospice services admission, despite a physician's order. The MDS coordinator acknowledged both errors.
A resident with muscle spasm, pain, and anxiety disorders was prescribed Tramadol for pain relief. Despite a care plan and physician order requiring daily pain monitoring, the facility failed to document the resident's pain status as required. The resident reported persistent pain, with some relief from medication, but the DON confirmed that monitoring was not completed as ordered.
A facility failed to ensure a resident receiving Risperidone, an antipsychotic medication, had an appropriate diagnosis. The resident, diagnosed with dementia without behavioral disturbances, anxiety disorders, and unspecified mood affective disorder, was cognitively intact and prescribed 0.5 mg of Risperidone twice daily. The care plan required monitoring for behaviors related to the medication, but the DON and pharmacist confirmed the absence of a proper diagnosis for the antipsychotic use.
A facility failed to document the coordination of care between hospice services and the facility for a resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Despite a physician's order for hospice admission, the resident's admission assessment did not reflect hospice services, and the administrator could not provide hospice documentation, including the plan of care.
A resident with a history of peripheral vascular disease and osteoporosis developed multiple pressure ulcers that were not adequately documented or treated in a timely manner. The facility failed to notify the physician promptly and did not implement sufficient preventative measures, as required by their policy. The administrator acknowledged the lack of action and documentation, and the resident had limited access to wound care specialists.
A facility failed to include critical medical needs in a baseline care plan for a resident with a right hip fracture, osteoarthritis, hypertension, anxiety, and impulse disorder. The resident returned from the hospital with an infected hip incision, requiring a JP drain, urinary catheter, wound vac, PICC line with IV antibiotics, and had wounds to the coccyx and buttocks. The baseline care plan did not address these needs, as confirmed by the DON.
Failure to Follow Physician's Order for BIPAP Use During Sleep and Naps
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow a physician's order for respiratory care for one resident who required the use of a BIPAP machine with oxygen at 3 LPM during sleep and naps. On three separate occasions, the resident was observed resting in bed during nap times without the BIPAP machine turned on, and the mask was found on the bedside table rather than in use. The physician's order, dated 07/14/25, specifically required the BIPAP to be used at bedtime and while napping. An RN confirmed that the resident should have had the BIPAP on during naps, indicating the order was not followed as required.
Failure to Ensure Safe Food Handling Training for All Dietary Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure all dietary staff received training in safe food handling practices for the prevention of foodborne illness. During a record review and interview, surveyors requested verification of food handler training for all dietary staff, and the administrator later provided training certificates for only five of seven dietary employees. It was identified that one cook and one dietary aide had not received the required food handler training, despite the administrator identifying that 37 residents received meals from the dietary department. This deficiency centers on the lack of documented and completed safe food handling training for these two dietary staff members.
Failure to Follow Posted Menu and Document Menu Substitutions
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to follow its planned menu and document menu substitutions during a noon meal service. Surveyors observed that at 12:30 p.m. on 12/22/25, the kitchen served chicken fried steak, mashed potatoes and gravy, cream corn, a dinner roll, and pineapple crisp, while the posted week five menu specified crumb crusted chicken, savory rice, Brussels sprouts, a dinner roll, and pineapple crisp. The administrator identified that 37 residents received nutrition from the kitchen for this meal. The facility had an undated policy titled “Menu Substitution” stating that menu substitutions would be recorded on a substitution record form and that the reason for the change would be noted. During the same observation, the dietary manager stated they were working off the week five menu and had to substitute items because the planned menu items were not available, but also acknowledged they did not document substitutions or specific reasons for them and were not aware of any substitution form. No additional resident-specific medical histories or conditions were documented in the report beyond the number of residents receiving nutrition from the kitchen.
Food Service Sanitation, Labeling, and Temperature Monitoring Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified multiple failures in the facility’s food service operations affecting 37 residents who received nutrition from the kitchen. In the kitchen refrigerator, they observed a container of prepared coleslaw and a container of cottage cheese that remained in storage past the manufacturer’s use-by dates, as well as two unlabeled plastic pitchers containing juice-like liquids without any preparation or use-by dates. Review of the Daily Refrigerator and Freezer Temperature Log for December showed missing temperature documentation for two consecutive days. Six chest freezers containing frozen food items were observed without visible thermometers inside. The dietary manager acknowledged that thermometers had been ordered and that staff had not been checking freezer temperatures because there were no thermometers present. Surveyors also observed environmental and procedural deficiencies in food preparation and storage. The food preparation area between the stove, steam table, and counters had missing floor tiles, and the dry food storage area floor had rough surfaces with debris and a buildup of dark matter. Two cardboard boxes of apple juice drink blend were stored directly on the floor under shelving in the dry storage room. During a lunch meal preparation observation, a cook prepared food without checking or documenting final cooking temperatures, and later stated they did not know they were supposed to check temperatures when food was finished cooking. The dietary manager stated there was no process or log in place for cooked and served food temperatures, while existing facility policies required refrigerated food to be covered, dated, and labeled, and required use of a meat thermometer to check internal temperatures.
Failure to Timely Report Alleged Abuse to State Agency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse involving a resident with dementia, behavioral disturbances, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, and migraines to the state agency within the required 2-hour timeframe. According to facility policy, all alleged violations and substantial incidents must be reported to the state agency. On the date in question, a staff member was observed being rough and speaking loudly to the resident while assisting them to a chair. The incident was reported to the facility administrator, who immediately initiated an internal investigation, including a camera review by the corporate office. However, the administrator determined the incident was not reportable and did not submit an incident report to the state agency, resulting in noncompliance with reporting requirements.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Anticoagulation Therapy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment for a resident receiving anticoagulation therapy. A quarterly assessment dated 11/05/25 documented that Resident #25 was receiving anticoagulant therapy. However, review of the resident’s November 2025 medication administration record showed no anticoagulant medication was ordered or administered for this resident. During an interview on 12/31/25 at 12:42 p.m., the MDS coordinator confirmed that Resident #25 did not take an anticoagulant medication and acknowledged that the assessment had been coded in error.
Expired Medications and Supplies Found in Medication Storage Room
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a failure to ensure removal of expired medications and supplies from the facility’s medication storage room, contrary to requirements that drugs and biologicals be properly labeled and stored. During an observation of the medication room with a registered nurse, surveyors found multiple expired items, including a box of 25-gauge needles with 3 ml syringes, a box of 21-gauge needles with 3 ml syringes, several packets and tubes of lubricating jelly, and multiple bisacodyl suppositories, all past their labeled expiration dates. The administrator reported that 37 residents resided in the facility at the time of the survey. During the same observation, the RN accompanying the surveyor acknowledged that the expired medications and supplies should already have been removed from the medication room. No additional information was provided about specific residents’ medical histories or conditions in relation to these expired items.
Failure to Implement Legionella Water Management Program and Involve Infection Preventionist
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure its Legionella water management program, which is part of the infection prevention and control program, was implemented as written and included the participation of the infection preventionist. The written policy dated 1/2022 specified that the water management team must include the infection preventionist, the administrator, the medical director or designee, the director of maintenance, and the director of environmental services, and referenced a detailed description and diagram of the facility’s water system and identification of areas that could promote growth and spread of waterborne bacteria. Record review showed a 2025 cleaning schedule for shower heads with quarterly entries completed for January, April, and July, but no documentation for October. During interview, the infection preventionist stated they did not know they were on the water management team, and the administrator stated there was no diagram for a water management program and confirmed there was no documentation for October 2025 in the logbook. The administrator identified that 37 residents resided in the facility at the time of the survey.
Failure to Maintain Safe and Homelike Environment Due to Ongoing Roof Leaks
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the physical environment in good repair, as evidenced by multiple observations of ceiling tiles with large brown watermark stains and sagging tiles in the dining room and several resident rooms. The stained and sagging ceiling tiles were noted around and near air vents, and the maintenance supervisor confirmed these issues were due to ongoing water leaks from the roof, which occurred every time it rained. The maintenance supervisor reported that while stained and sagging tiles were replaced frequently, the underlying issue of the leaking roof had not been permanently addressed. The administrator acknowledged that the roof had been leaking since their employment began and that management was aware of the problem but had not taken permanent action to resolve it. The facility's policy required a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, which was not upheld due to these ongoing environmental deficiencies.
Lack of Comprehensive Care Plan for Indwelling Urinary Catheter
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan addressing indwelling urinary catheter care and maintenance for one resident with a documented need for such care. Record review showed that the resident had medical diagnoses including urinary retention and congenital bladder neck obstruction, and a physician's order was in place to change the catheter every 30 days and perform catheter care every shift and as needed. The resident was assessed as cognitively intact and was known to have an indwelling urinary catheter. However, review of the resident's care plan revealed no documentation or plan for catheter care and maintenance. The MDS coordinator confirmed that a comprehensive care plan for urinary catheter care had not been developed for this resident, despite it being required.
Failure to Update Care Plan After Resident-to-Resident Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to update a resident's care plan following an incident of abusive behavior involving two residents. According to the facility's policy, care plans are to be revised as new information about a resident's condition becomes available, and interventions should address the underlying sources of problem areas. Despite this, after an incident where a resident with non-Alzheimer's dementia and intact cognition was observed pushing another resident and attempting to tie a neck pillow around their neck, no updates or new interventions were added to the resident's care plan. The incident was reported to the appropriate authorities, and immediate actions were taken to separate the residents and provide one-on-one supervision for the resident involved in the abusive behavior. A review of the resident's care plan, last revised after the incident, showed no documentation of the behaviors or any new interventions related to the event. The MDS coordinator confirmed that the care plan was not updated following the incident, despite facility policy requiring updates after significant changes in a resident's health or behavior. The lack of care plan revision occurred even though the resident's assessment indicated ongoing cognitive and behavioral concerns.
Failure to Notify Physician of Catheter Site Infection Signs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the physician of signs and/or symptoms of a potential infection at the urinary catheter entry site for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter. According to the facility's policy, nursing staff are required to document a comprehensive assessment and notify the physician when infection is suspected, including providing details of the assessment, observed symptoms, and the time symptoms were first noted. The resident in question had a history of urinary retention, congenital bladder neck obstruction, and recurrent urinary tract infections, and was cognitively moderately impaired. Physician orders were in place to monitor the catheter site for infection and report any signs to the physician. Despite multiple nurse notes documenting odorous brownish and tannish brown drainage from the catheter site over several days, there was no documentation that the physician was notified of these symptoms. Interviews with nursing staff confirmed that the physician should have been notified, but there was no record of such communication. The resident was later admitted to the hospital for a complicated urinary tract infection and hypotension, and the planned suprapubic catheter placement was not performed at that time.
Failure to Post Complete Staffing Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to post the required staffing information as mandated. During observations on two separate occasions, it was noted that the staffing information was documented on a whiteboard at the nursing station. However, the facility name, projected staffing hours, and actual staffing hours were not included in the documentation. The observations took place on 11/05/24 and 11/07/24, where only the date, census, and staff/title were documented. Furthermore, during an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) admitted to being unaware of the specific staffing information required to be documented on the staffing board.
Failure to Date and Cover Urinary Catheter Bags
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to proper urinary catheter care protocols for two residents, leading to a deficiency. Resident #11, who had diagnoses including overactive bladder, paraplegia, and a stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer, was observed with a urinary catheter bag that was neither dated nor covered, despite a physician's order for catheter care per facility guidelines. This was confirmed by the Director of Nursing (DON) on a subsequent date. Similarly, Resident #35, diagnosed with retention of urine and congenital bladder neck obstruction, was observed multiple times with a urinary catheter bag that was not dated or covered. The observations were made while the resident was sitting in a recliner in their room, and the deficiency was acknowledged by the DON. Both residents were among the four identified by the DON as having urinary catheters, yet the facility failed to ensure their catheter bags were dated and covered as required.
Failure to Document DNR Orders for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders were properly documented for three residents, despite their advance directives indicating a preference for DNR status. Resident #4, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus and cerebral infarction, had a DNR care plan and signed consent form but lacked a physician's order for DNR. Similarly, Resident #7, with Parkinson's, dementia, behavioral disturbance, and anxiety, had a DNR care plan and a consent form signed by their Power of Attorney (POA), yet no physician's order was present. Resident #10, suffering from chronic kidney disease stage 3, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and congestive heart failure, also had a DNR care plan and signed consent form without a corresponding physician's order. The MDS coordinator was unaware that a physician's order was necessary for DNR residents, leading to this oversight.
Failure to Notify Physician of Out-of-Parameter Blood Sugar Levels
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the physician of out-of-parameter blood sugar levels for two residents with diabetes. Resident #21, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes with autonomic polyneuropathy, had a physician's order to notify the physician if blood sugar levels were below 70 or above 400. On October 2, 2024, the resident's blood sugar was recorded at 458, but there was no documentation indicating that the physician was notified. Similarly, Resident #31, with type 2 diabetes mellitus, had a physician's order to notify the physician if blood sugar levels were below 60 or above 400. There was no documentation of physician notification for several instances where the resident's blood sugar exceeded 400, specifically on September 20, 24, 27, 30, and October 14, 2024. Interviews with RN #1 and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the physician should have been notified, and the lack of documentation indicated that this did not occur.
Inaccurate Resident Assessments for Medications and Hospice Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate resident assessments for two residents. One resident, with diagnoses including heart failure and cerebral infarction, was documented as taking an anticoagulant in their assessment, despite a physician's order indicating they were taking an antiplatelet medication, aspirin. The MDS coordinator acknowledged the error, noting that the medication section of the assessment was auto-populated and the mistake was not caught. Another resident, diagnosed with atrial fibrillation and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, was admitted to hospice services, but their admission assessment did not reflect this. The MDS coordinator confirmed the omission upon review of the assessment.
Failure to Monitor Resident's Pain as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper monitoring of a resident experiencing pain. The resident, who was cognitively intact, had diagnoses including muscle spasm, pain, and anxiety disorders, and was prescribed Tramadol 50 mg as needed for pain. An admission assessment noted the resident experienced occasional pain rated six on a scale from 0 to 10. The care plan indicated the resident's pain should be relieved or controlled, and a physician order required staff to monitor the resident's pain daily across all shifts, documenting whether the resident experienced pain. However, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the monitoring was not completed as ordered, despite the resident reporting persistent pain in their left arm and leg, with some relief from the medication provided.
Lack of Appropriate Diagnosis for Antipsychotic Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident receiving psychotropic medication had an appropriate diagnosis or indication for the use of an antipsychotic medication. The resident, who had diagnoses including dementia without behavioral or psychotic disturbances, anxiety disorders, and unspecified mood affective disorder, was prescribed Risperidone, an antipsychotic medication, at a dose of 0.5 mg twice daily. The admission assessment indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and was receiving both an antipsychotic and an antianxiety medication. The care plan required staff to monitor the resident for behaviors, both verbal and non-verbal, for which the medication was being administered. However, upon review of the resident's clinical record, the Director of Nursing (DON) was uncertain if there was an appropriate diagnosis for the antipsychotic medication. Additionally, the facility pharmacist confirmed that the resident was receiving an antipsychotic medication without a corresponding diagnosis.
Lack of Hospice Care Documentation for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper documentation of the coordination of care between hospice services and the facility for a resident receiving hospice care. The resident, who had diagnoses including atrial fibrillation and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, was admitted to hospice services with a physician's order dated 08/21/24. However, the admission assessment dated 08/27/24 did not document that the resident was receiving hospice services. Furthermore, on 11/06/24, the facility administrator was unable to provide any hospice documentation regarding the resident's hospice services, including the plan of care. This deficiency was identified during a review of records and interviews, affecting one resident out of the three identified by the Director of Nursing as receiving hospice services.
Failure to Prevent and Manage Pressure Ulcers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate treatment and services to prevent the worsening of pressure ulcers for a resident with a history of peripheral vascular disease, osteoporosis, and a fracture of the neck of the right femur. Upon admission, the resident did not have open pressure areas, but a small pressure area was noted on the buttocks shortly after. Despite this, there was a lack of consistent documentation and follow-up on the wound's condition until a week later when multiple open areas were identified on the resident's buttocks and sacrum. The wounds were not staged, and the physician was not notified until the day after the wounds were documented by the nursing staff. The facility's pressure ulcer policy requires aggressive and appropriate preventative measures, but the only documented intervention prior to the discovery of the wounds was repositioning every two hours. The treatment record showed that medication orders for the wounds were initiated only after the physician was notified, and a cushion for the wheelchair was ordered the following day. The facility's administrator acknowledged the lack of action and documentation, and the resident had only seen a wound care specialist once since the wounds were identified.
Failure to Include Critical Medical Needs in Baseline Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an accurate baseline care plan for a resident who was admitted with multiple complex medical needs. The resident had a history of a right hip fracture, osteoarthritis, hypertension, anxiety, and impulse disorder. Upon returning from the hospital, the resident had an infected right hip incision and required a JP drain, an indwelling urinary catheter, a wound vac to the right hip incision, a PICC line with IV antibiotics, and had wounds to the coccyx and buttocks. The baseline care plan initiated on 05/09/24 and updated on 05/21/24 did not address the resident's JP drain, indwelling urinary catheter, wound vac, PICC line, or wounds. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the baseline care plan should have included these elements, indicating a lapse in the facility's care planning process for the resident's immediate needs.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 5 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Mcalester
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mcalester Nursing & Rehab | 0.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Mitchell Care & Rehab Center | 1.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Heritage Hills Living & Rehabilitation Center | 2 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Walnut Grove Care & Rehab Center | 3.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Beare Manor | 13.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for New Hope Retirement & Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.