Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Yorktown Rehabilitation & Nursing Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A cognitively impaired resident with dementia and impaired communication, already care‑planned as being at increased risk for abuse, was found by a CNA with a long‑term housekeeping employee lying prone on top of them in bed with the employee’s pants lowered. The CNA heard sounds, noticed the room curtain closed, entered, observed the incident, confronted the staff member, and reported it. Internal statements documented that the housekeeper admitted having done “something bad” before rapidly leaving the building. The resident was later diagnosed in the ED with sexual assault of an adult and received multiple antimicrobial and antiviral medications, while facility and medical documentation noted the resident appeared calm and at baseline, with severe cognitive impairment limiting awareness of the event.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and mobility issues was not properly assessed for fall risk due to incomplete and inconsistent documentation by nursing staff. The fall risk assessment omitted key sections, resulting in an inaccurate low-risk score, and the resident later experienced an unwitnessed fall with injury. Staff interviews confirmed errors in both the assessment process and electronic documentation.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and significant mobility needs was left unsupervised in a room out of staff view, resulting in an unwitnessed fall with injury. Despite being known as a fall risk and requiring assistance, the resident had no specific monitoring measures in place, and staff interviews revealed inconsistent understanding of the resident's supervision needs.
Failure to Protect Cognitively Impaired Resident From Sexual Abuse by Staff
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to protect a cognitively impaired resident from sexual abuse by a staff member. The resident had diagnoses including non‑traumatic brain dysfunction, non‑Alzheimer dementia, depression, and early onset Alzheimer dementia, with documented short‑ and long‑term memory problems and severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. Care plans identified impaired communication and cognition with an increased risk for abuse, and directed staff to monitor for changes in mood, behavior, and unexplained injuries. Despite these identified vulnerabilities and care plan directives, the resident was subjected to an alleged sexual assault by a long‑term housekeeping employee. On the morning of 02/21/2026 at approximately 6:53 AM, a CNA conducting rounds heard sounds from the resident’s room, noticed the privacy curtain closed (which they reported they had not closed), and entered the room. The CNA observed a housekeeper lying in a prone position on top of the resident in the resident’s bed, with the housekeeper’s pants lowered to mid‑thigh. The CNA questioned the housekeeper, who immediately jumped off the bed and pulled up their pants, and then begged the CNA not to say anything. The CNA instructed the housekeeper to leave the unit and then reported the incident to the nurse. The roommate’s curtain was closed and the roommate was asleep at the time. Subsequent internal interviews documented that another housekeeper reported the implicated housekeeper came to the locker room shortly thereafter stating, “I did something bad,” and left, and a dietary cook observed the housekeeper running out of the building. The facility’s internal documentation and hospital records identified the event as an alleged sexual assault, with the hospital emergency department listing the visit diagnosis as sexual assault of an adult and administering multiple antimicrobial and antiviral medications. Facility staff, including the RN supervisor, DON, social work, and the physician, documented that the resident appeared calm, at baseline, and without signs of distress following the incident, and the spouse and physician both noted that due to the resident’s severe cognitive impairment, the resident likely did not understand what had occurred. The surveyors determined that the resident experienced actual psychosocial harm using the reasonable person concept from the CMS Psychosocial Outcome Severity Guide.
Failure to Accurately Assess Fall Risk for Cognitively Impaired Resident
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with severe cognitive impairment, chronic confusion, and gait/balance disturbances was not accurately assessed for fall risk upon admission. The resident, who required significant assistance with mobility and activities of daily living, was incorrectly identified as low risk for falls due to an incomplete fall risk assessment. The assessment failed to include critical information such as the gait/balance section, resulting in an inaccurate score. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in the documentation of the resident's cognitive status, with the admission assessment indicating alert and oriented status, while other records noted chronic confusion and mild cognitive impairment. The incomplete and inaccurate assessment led to the resident not being properly identified as high risk for falls. Subsequently, the resident experienced an unwitnessed fall, sustaining a laceration and a bruise. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the electronic medical record system sometimes generated incorrect scores when sections of the assessment were left incomplete, and the nurse responsible for the assessment acknowledged the errors but did not provide a clear explanation for the discrepancies in documentation.
Failure to Provide Adequate Supervision and Accident Hazard Prevention
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with severe cognitive impairment, impaired thought process, and multiple medical conditions including COPD, diabetes, and peripheral vascular disease, was left unsupervised in their room. The resident required significant assistance with mobility and activities of daily living, and was assessed as a low fall risk on admission, with interventions such as call light within reach and partial side rails. Despite these measures, the resident's room was located behind the nurse's station and out of staff view, and there was no documented evidence of specific supervision or monitoring for safety. On the day of the incident, the resident was left alone in their wheelchair for approximately thirty to forty minutes, during which time they experienced an unwitnessed fall resulting in a laceration and bruising. Interviews with staff revealed inconsistent assessments of the resident's fall risk and safety needs. While some staff considered the resident a fall risk and stated that such residents are typically kept near the nurse's station for observation, the resident was left alone in their room at the request of their representatives. The care plan and assessments did not include enhanced supervision or monitoring, and staff relied on standard interventions. The lack of adequate supervision and failure to anticipate the resident's safety needs directly contributed to the incident.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 472 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 3 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Cortlandt Manor
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Emerald Peek Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 2.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| North Westchester Restorative Therapy & Nrsg Crt | 2.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Cortlandt Healthcare | 3.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| New York State Veterans Home At Montrose | 4.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Springvale Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 5.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 29 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Yorktown Rehabilitation & Nursing Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.