Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Rosa Coplon Jewish Home And Infirmary during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to maintain a clean and comfortable environment, with observations revealing discolored and sticky flooring in resident rooms and soiled carpets in common areas. Housekeepers noted issues with cleaning chemicals and a lack of a clear schedule for floor maintenance. Residents and staff expressed dissatisfaction with the cleanliness, citing infrequent carpet cleaning and inadequate equipment. The facility lacked a structured cleaning schedule and proper equipment, contributing to the deficiency.
The facility was cited for deficiencies in food safety and sanitation, including inadequate pest control, poor environmental conditions in the kitchen, and failure to follow food labeling and dating policies. Observations revealed live and dead flies, damaged and soiled surfaces, and unlabeled food items. Staff interviews highlighted unclear responsibilities for maintaining cleanliness and food safety standards.
A resident did not receive their prescribed Adderall medication for several days due to a communication breakdown between facility staff, the pharmacy, and the medical provider. The LPN failed to notify the RN Unit Manager about the medication's unavailability, and the prescribing doctor was not informed in a timely manner that a signature was required, resulting in missed doses.
A medication error occurred when an LPN administered the wrong medications to a resident, leading to significant health concerns. The resident, with a history of encephalopathy and depression, exhibited somnolence and altered mental status after receiving medications intended for another resident. Despite the potential for adverse reactions, there was no documented evidence of consistent monitoring, and the medical provider was not immediately informed. Interviews revealed inconsistencies in reporting and follow-up, with the expected protocol not being followed.
Deficiency in Facility's Housekeeping and Maintenance Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment for its residents, as evidenced by the condition of the flooring and carpeting throughout the facility. Observations during the survey revealed that the vinyl composite tile (VCT) flooring in several resident rooms was discolored, sticky, and in need of stripping and waxing. Housekeepers reported that the stickiness might be due to the chemicals used for cleaning, and there was no clear schedule for stripping and waxing floors. The Environmental Services Operations Manager and the Maintenance Operations Manager acknowledged the need for regular floor maintenance but noted that the facility lacked a policy and procedure for housekeeping services or floor care. Additionally, the carpeting in the common areas, including corridors and lounges, was found to be soiled, stained, and in poor condition. Residents and staff reported that the carpets were not vacuumed or steam cleaned regularly, and the facility's carpet cleaning equipment was inadequate for the level of carpet problems. The Environmental Services Operations Manager mentioned that the facility used to have a machine that kept the carpets immaculate, but it had been out of service for three years. The Administrator confirmed that the facility did not have an experienced team or proper equipment for carpet cleaning, and efforts to address the carpet issues were ongoing but slow. Interviews with residents and staff highlighted dissatisfaction with the cleanliness and maintenance of the facility's flooring and carpeting. Residents reported that their floors were not stripped and waxed regularly, and the carpets in the hallways were stained and needed replacement. Staff members noted that the carpets appeared dirty and stained, and the facility's attempts to clean them were not effective. The lack of a structured cleaning schedule and inadequate equipment contributed to the facility's failure to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for its residents.
Deficiencies in Food Safety and Sanitation Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility was found to have multiple deficiencies in food storage, preparation, distribution, and service during an abbreviated survey. Observations revealed the presence of live and dead flies in various areas of the Main Kitchen and Unit Serveries, indicating inadequate pest control measures. The insect light traps were not properly maintained, with one being unplugged and another having a collection paper completely covered in dead flies. The facility's pest management agreement included weekly service for insect light traps, but reports from the exterminator indicated ongoing issues with non-functional traps that were not addressed. Environmental conditions in the Main Kitchen were substandard, with damaged and missing ceiling tiles, standing water, grease accumulation, and soiled equipment surfaces. Handwash sinks were out of service or lacked single-service towels, and there were water leaks and backups in the dishwash room. The facility's cleaning schedule did not specify responsible parties for tasks, leading to unclear accountability. Additionally, the kitchen waste disposal machines were out of service, requiring staff to manually dispose of food scraps, which increased the risk of contamination. Food labeling and dating practices were not followed, with unlabeled and undated food items found in the Unit Serveries. The facility's policy required all foods to be labeled and dated, with unused portions discarded after three days. However, observations revealed expired and undated food items, such as yogurt and salads, in the servery refrigerators. Interviews with staff indicated a lack of clarity regarding responsibilities for checking and discarding outdated food items, contributing to the deficiencies observed.
Failure to Administer Prescribed Medication Due to Communication Breakdown
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of a resident, specifically in acquiring and administering the medication Adderall as prescribed. Resident #2, who had diagnoses including attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, joint replacement surgery, and anxiety disorder, did not receive their prescribed medication from 7/16/24 to 7/19/24. The medication was not acquired from the pharmacy and administered as ordered, resulting in four missed doses. The resident expressed frustration over the situation, citing excuses from the facility staff regarding the medication not being transcribed correctly or not being approved by the doctor. The issue arose due to a lack of communication and coordination among the facility staff, pharmacy, and medical provider. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated that the medication was not available because the pharmacy required confirmation from the medical provider, which was delayed. The Registered Nurse (RN) Unit Manager was not informed of the medication's unavailability, and the prescribing Medical Doctor was not notified until several days later that a signature was required. The Director of Nursing expected the Nursing Supervisor or Unit Manager to be notified if a medication was unavailable, but this protocol was not followed, leading to the deficiency.
Medication Error and Inadequate Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors, as evidenced by an incident involving a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) who administered the wrong medications to a resident. On the morning of May 4, 2024, the LPN mistakenly gave Resident #1 the medications intended for another resident, Resident #4. The medications included Ferrous Sulfate, Senna, Clonazepam, Levetiracetam, and Memantine. The error was discovered when the LPN attempted to administer the medications to Resident #4. Although the medical provider was notified, there was no documented evidence that Resident #1 was monitored according to the provider's recommendations. Resident #1, who had diagnoses including encephalopathy, age-related physical debility, and depression, was noted to have moderately impaired cognition. Following the medication error, Resident #1 was reported to be somnolent with altered mental status and slurred speech. The complainant, who was notified of the error, observed these symptoms when visiting the resident. Despite the potential for adverse reactions, particularly from the administration of Clonazepam, there was no documented evidence of consistent monitoring for adverse effects over the recommended period. Interviews with various staff members, including the Medical Doctor, LPNs, and Registered Nurses, revealed inconsistencies in the reporting and follow-up of the medication error. The Medical Doctor was not immediately informed of the discrepancy, and there was no clear documentation of monitoring or follow-up actions in the resident's progress notes. The Director of Nursing stated that the expected protocol of monitoring for 48-72 hours was not followed, and there was a lack of documentation to support that Resident #1 was adequately monitored for potential side effects or changes in condition following the error.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 161 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 3 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Getzville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beechwood Health Care Center, Inc. | 0.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Elderwood At Williamsville | 3.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Elderwood At Amherst | 3.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Safire Rehabilitation Of Northtowns, L L C | 3.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Canterbury Woods | 3.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Rosa Coplon Jewish Home And Infirmary.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.