Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Pruitthealth-farmville during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Surveyors found that expired and unlabeled food items were not discarded from a resident nourishment refrigerator as required by facility policy. The Dietary Manager admitted to not checking the refrigerator daily as expected, resulting in multiple outdated and improperly labeled food items remaining in storage.
The facility failed to accurately code the PASARR status for a resident with serious mental illness and did not properly document oral/dental issues for another resident on their MDS assessments. Staff interviews confirmed that the assessments did not reflect the residents' actual conditions as documented in their records and observed by staff.
A resident with dementia and a documented fall risk did not have a care planned fall mat in place at the bedside, as required by the care plan. Staff interviews confirmed the fall mat had previously been used but was not present during recent shifts, and staff did not routinely verify care plan interventions for familiar residents. The DON and Administrator confirmed the intervention was still current and should have been implemented.
The facility did not provide or arrange for necessary dental services for a resident, resulting in unmet dental care needs.
Two residents at high risk for falls were not adequately supervised, resulting in avoidable falls and injuries. In one case, a cognitively impaired resident sustained a collarbone fracture and hematoma after being left unsupervised when a nurse aide fell asleep and another nurse failed to intervene. In the second case, a resident with impaired cognition and mobility was left unattended in the bathroom and fell, sustaining a minor head injury. Staff interviews and records confirmed lapses in monitoring and adherence to care plans.
A nurse failed to immediately assess a resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of falls after discovering the resident on the floor. Instead, the nurse left the resident unattended to wake a sleeping nurse aide and notify the assigned nurse, resulting in a delay in evaluation. The resident was later found to have a scalp hematoma and clavicular fracture.
A resident in an LTC facility, who was cognitively intact, experienced misappropriation of funds by a nurse aide with a criminal history. The resident's debit card was used without consent to pay utility bills, and checks were written to the aide under false pretenses. The facility's administrator discovered the unauthorized transactions and involved the police, leading to charges against the aide.
The facility failed to assess and obtain informed consent for siderail use for two residents, leading to a deficiency. Staff did not attempt alternatives, assess entrapment risk, or recognize siderails as adaptive equipment. The facility lacked specific assessment forms and informed consent documentation, resulting in improper siderail installation without necessary evaluations.
A resident with dementia was not allowed to return to the facility after hospitalization, despite being cleared by a psychiatric evaluation. The facility cited safety concerns and issued a discharge notice, but only readmitted the resident after intervention by the State Agency and LTC Ombudsman. The resident had been transferred to the hospital following an incident of agitation and confusion.
Failure to Discard Expired Food in Resident Nourishment Refrigerator
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that the facility failed to discard out-of-date leftover food items stored in the resident nourishment refrigerator. During an inspection, multiple food containers were found in the refrigerator, some labeled with dates indicating they were well past the facility's stated discard timeframe of two days, and one container was found without any label or date. The items included cooked chicken, corn, macaroni and cheese, cooked greens, a hard pink object identified as possibly turkey breast, blueberry pie, white cake, and another container with unrecognizable contents. Several of these items appeared hard, dry, or otherwise unfit for consumption. The Dietary Manager, who was present during the observation, acknowledged that all the items should have already been discarded according to facility policy and admitted that she had not checked the refrigerator the previous day due to being busy in the kitchen. She stated that it was her responsibility to check the refrigerator daily, Monday through Friday, for unlabeled or expired items, but the last check had been the previous week. The Administrator confirmed that the Dietary Manager was responsible for ensuring out-of-date food was discarded in accordance with policy.
Inaccurate Coding of PASARR Status and Oral/Dental Status on MDS Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately code the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) status and the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for two residents. For one resident with diagnoses including schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder, the PASARR Level II Determination Notification indicated an ongoing status with no end date. However, the resident's MDS assessment was incorrectly coded as not currently considered by the state PASARR Level II process to have a serious mental illness. Staff interviews confirmed the error and acknowledged it was an oversight. For another resident, the nursing admission observation documented obvious or likely cavities or broken natural teeth, and the resident was observed to have multiple broken and discolored teeth. Despite this, the resident's admission MDS assessment did not reflect any dental issues, and the dental care area was not triggered. The staff member responsible for coding the oral/dental section of the MDS did not recall reviewing the nursing admission assessment or directly observing the resident's teeth. The DON confirmed the resident had broken and discolored teeth since admission, and the MDS assessment should have accurately reflected this condition.
Failure to Implement Care Planned Fall Prevention Intervention
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement a care planned intervention for a resident with dementia who was identified as being at risk for falls. The resident's comprehensive care plan included the use of a fall mat on the right side of the bed as an intervention to prevent injury from falls. Observations on two separate occasions revealed that the fall mat was not present at the bedside or anywhere in the resident's room, despite the care plan indicating it should be in place. The resident was noted to be severely cognitively impaired, used a wheelchair for mobility, and required varying levels of assistance for bed mobility and transfers, but had not experienced any recent falls. Interviews with staff members, including a nurse aide and a nurse who regularly cared for the resident, confirmed that the fall mat had previously been in place but was not present during their recent shifts. Both staff members acknowledged awareness of the resident's fall risk but did not verify the care plan for ongoing interventions, relying instead on visual cues or familiarity with the resident. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator both confirmed that the fall mat intervention was still current and should have been implemented, but it was not in place at the time of the observations.
Failure to Provide or Obtain Dental Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide or obtain necessary dental services for each resident as required. This deficiency was identified based on the surveyor's findings that dental care needs were not met for at least one resident. The report specifically notes the lack of provision or arrangement for dental services, but does not provide further details regarding the resident's medical history or condition at the time of the deficiency.
Failure to Provide Adequate Supervision to Prevent Falls
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide effective supervision to prevent avoidable falls for two residents identified as high risk for falls. One resident, who was severely cognitively impaired and had a history of falls, was left in the dining room for closer monitoring. Despite this, the assigned nurse aide was found asleep with her back to the resident, and another nurse observed the resident attempting to stand but did not intervene because she was not assigned to that resident. The resident subsequently fell, sustaining a collarbone fracture and a hematoma on the forehead, and required hospitalization. Documentation and interviews confirmed that staff were aware of the resident's fall risk and the need for close monitoring, but failed to provide adequate supervision at the time of the incident. Another resident, with a history of seizures, cerebral vascular accident, and vascular dementia, was also at high risk for falls and required substantial assistance with transfers. On the day of the incident, a nurse aide assisted the resident to the toilet, instructed him to use the call bell when finished, and left the resident unattended in the bathroom. The resident did not use the call bell and attempted to transfer himself, resulting in a fall and a minor head laceration. The nurse aide was new to the facility and was not fully familiar with the resident's care needs, and the resident was known to be noncompliant with using the call bell for assistance. In both cases, the lack of effective supervision and failure to follow established care plans and interventions for high-risk residents directly led to avoidable falls and injuries. Staff interviews and documentation revealed lapses in monitoring, communication, and adherence to resident-specific safety measures, contributing to the deficiencies identified during the survey.
Failure to Immediately Assess Resident After Fall
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a nurse failed to immediately assess a resident after a fall. The resident, who had multiple diagnoses including intellectual disabilities, dementia, osteoporosis, and a history of falls, was found on the floor in the dining room by a nurse who was not assigned to her care area. Instead of performing an immediate assessment, the nurse walked past the resident, who was alert and awake on the ground, and attempted to wake a nurse aide who was sleeping nearby. The nurse then instructed the aide to stay with the resident while she went to notify the assigned nurse. No assessment or assistance was provided by the first nurse at the time of discovery. The assigned nurse responded promptly upon notification and assessed the resident, who was found to have a large knot on her forehead and complained of left shoulder pain. A neurological check was performed before moving the resident, and the physician assistant was contacted, resulting in the resident being sent to the hospital. Hospital records later confirmed the resident sustained a frontal scalp hematoma and a non-operable clavicular fracture. The Director of Nursing confirmed that all staff are expected to provide care and attention to any resident in need, regardless of assignment.
Misappropriation of Resident's Funds by Staff Member
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from misappropriation of personal belongings and money by a staff member. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had a history of stroke and rheumatoid arthritis, reported that her debit card number was stolen and used to pay utility bills without her consent. Additionally, the resident had given money to a nurse aide, believing it would be reimbursed, but it was not. The nurse aide had a history of forgery and other crimes, which the facility was aware of prior to hiring. The administrator was informed of the resident's concerns about her bank account balance and initiated an investigation. It was discovered that the resident had written multiple checks to the nurse aide, who claimed they were for cashing on behalf of the resident. However, the resident confirmed that the checks were given out of sympathy for the nurse aide's financial struggles. The administrator found that the unauthorized utility charge was linked to a phone number associated with the nurse aide's daughter, who lived with the nurse aide. The police were involved, and it was confirmed that there were warrants for the arrest of the nurse aide. The facility's administrator had not been aware of the nurse aide's criminal background at the time of hiring, as she was not the administrator then. The investigation revealed that the nurse aide's daughter was involved in the fraudulent use of the resident's debit card, leading to charges being filed against the nurse aide.
Failure to Assess and Obtain Consent for Siderail Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow proper procedures before installing bed rails for two residents, leading to a deficiency. For Resident #24, who was admitted with hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke, there was no siderail screening conducted. The resident required total assistance with bed mobility and transfers, and the care plan included the use of one-quarter siderails to aid in bed mobility. However, the facility did not attempt alternatives to siderails, assess entrapment risk, or obtain informed consent from the resident or their representative. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of understanding that siderails were considered adaptive equipment, and there was no specific assessment form available for siderails. Similarly, for Resident #37, who was admitted with COPD, encephalopathy, and general muscle weakness, there was no siderail screening conducted. The resident was independent with bed mobility, and the care plan included the use of one-quarter siderails. The facility again failed to attempt alternatives, assess entrapment risk, or obtain informed consent. Staff interviews indicated that siderails were automatically installed on beds upon admission, and there was no clear responsibility for discussing risks and benefits or obtaining consent. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator were unaware that siderails were considered adaptive equipment and that alternatives needed to be tried and documented. The facility lacked a form for informed consent for siderail use, and the restraint and adaptive equipment observation form did not address necessary assessments or discussions. The Administrator acknowledged the oversight and indicated that the forms used were chosen from options provided by the corporate office.
Facility Fails to Readmit Resident After Hospitalization
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to permit a resident to return after hospitalization, violating the bed-hold policy. Resident #23, diagnosed with dementia and exhibiting severe cognitive impairment, was transferred to the hospital following an incident where he became agitated and combative. Despite being cleared by a psychiatric evaluation to return, the facility refused readmission, leaving the resident in the hospital's Emergency Department until intervention by the State Agency and Long Term Care Ombudsman. The incident began when Resident #23, who typically did not walk, became confused and entered another resident's room through a shared bathroom. Attempts to redirect him led to increased agitation, resulting in the involvement of Emergency Medical Services and his subsequent transfer to the hospital. The facility's Director of Nursing required a psychiatric evaluation before considering his return, despite the hospital's clearance indicating he was not a danger to himself or others. The facility issued a discharge notice citing the inability to meet Resident #23's needs and concerns for safety, despite having available rooms. The decision not to readmit was made by the facility's administration, and it was only after the State Agency's involvement that the resident was allowed to return. Interviews with staff, the resident's family, and the LTC Ombudsman highlighted the facility's delay and refusal to readmit, despite the resident's family member being present throughout the hospital stay and no further issues occurring upon his return.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 65 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Farmville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Macgregor Downs Health Center By Harborview | 9.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| East Carolina Health And Rehabilitation Center | 10.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 14 | 0 |
| Greenville Health And Rehabilitation Center | 10.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Greendale Forest Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 10.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Ayden Court Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 11.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Pruitthealth-farmville.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.