Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Implement Care Planned Fall Prevention Intervention

Farmville, North Carolina Survey Completed on 08-07-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement a care planned intervention for a resident with dementia who was identified as being at risk for falls. The resident's comprehensive care plan included the use of a fall mat on the right side of the bed as an intervention to prevent injury from falls. Observations on two separate occasions revealed that the fall mat was not present at the bedside or anywhere in the resident's room, despite the care plan indicating it should be in place. The resident was noted to be severely cognitively impaired, used a wheelchair for mobility, and required varying levels of assistance for bed mobility and transfers, but had not experienced any recent falls. Interviews with staff members, including a nurse aide and a nurse who regularly cared for the resident, confirmed that the fall mat had previously been in place but was not present during their recent shifts. Both staff members acknowledged awareness of the resident's fall risk but did not verify the care plan for ongoing interventions, relying instead on visual cues or familiarity with the resident. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator both confirmed that the fall mat intervention was still current and should have been implemented, but it was not in place at the time of the observations.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙