Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at The Bluffs Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A cognitively impaired resident with a history of cerebral infarction, right-sided hemiplegia, and a documented moderate risk for wandering was able to leave a supervised front porch area without staff awareness, propel a wheelchair down the facility driveway, and cross a heavily trafficked road into an area with a steep ditch and wooded terrain. Staff interviews showed that the resident was usually outside with other residents and staff present, but on the day of the incident a CNA last saw the resident on the porch and was unsure how the resident exited unsupervised. The resident was ultimately discovered by a CNA who had been alerted by a pest control worker, by which time the resident had already crossed the roadway, demonstrating a failure to provide adequate supervision and prevent elopement for a cognitively impaired individual.
A resident with a gastrostomy and PEG tube was under Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), as indicated by facility policy and signage requiring staff to wear gloves and a gown during high-contact care, including feeding tube care and use. An LPN was observed administering medications via the resident’s PEG tube without donning a gown, despite the posted EBP instructions. In interviews, the LPN acknowledged understanding that EBP are used to prevent infection and agreed a gown should have been worn, and the DON confirmed the expectation that a gown be used for PEG tube medication administration under EBP.
A resident's baseline care plan and bedside Kardex lacked documentation of transfer needs, despite the individual being dependent and requiring a total lift. This omission led to a transfer-related injury, as staff were not informed of the correct transfer method. Staff interviews and record reviews confirmed the absence of this critical information.
A resident assessed as dependent for transfers was manually moved from bed to wheelchair by two staff members without the required mechanical lift, despite being informed by the resident and her representative that a lift was necessary. During the transfer, the resident slipped and sustained a traumatic laceration to her right leg after striking exposed metal on the wheelchair. Staff did not consult the nurse supervisor or question the transfer method, and the resident's transfer status was not clearly communicated on the Kardex.
A resident with dementia was found restrained to her bed with sheets tied across her chest and legs by an LPN, violating the facility's restraint-free policy. The incident was reported by staff who removed the restraints and notified the DON. The LPN admitted to using the sheets to prevent the resident from getting up unassisted, despite denying they were used as restraints. The resident was unharmed, and the LPN was terminated following an investigation.
The facility failed to provide RN coverage for eight hours on a specific day, as required by policy. The DON scheduled an RN who had requested the day off and did not cover the shift herself, resulting in a staffing deficiency. No incidents or IV therapy occurred on that day.
The facility failed to submit accurate staffing data into the PBJ system for the fourth quarter of 2024. The policy requires staffing data to include daily hours worked by each staff member. However, the PBJ Staffing Data Report revealed excessively low weekend staffing. The Administrator and DON confirmed the data was incorrect due to employees not clocking out and in for weekend mealtimes, affecting weekend hours.
The facility failed to provide written transfer notifications to residents or their representatives for hospital transfers, as required by policy. This deficiency affected three residents, including one who is cognitively intact and his own responsible party. The Social Services Director admitted to not sending these notifications, and the Administrator confirmed the oversight.
The facility failed to provide written bed-hold notifications to residents or their representatives following hospital transfers, as required by their policy. This deficiency affected three residents, including one with End Stage Renal Disease and another with Malignant Neoplasm of Glottis. Interviews revealed a lack of awareness and implementation of the policy by Social Services and the Administrator.
A facility failed to follow proper hand hygiene protocols during wound care for a resident with a Stage 4 pressure ulcer. An RN did not change gloves or wash hands between dirty and clean procedures, which was confirmed by the DON as a breach of infection control policy. This lapse could potentially lead to infection and delay healing.
The facility failed to implement comprehensive care plans for personal hygiene for three residents, leading to deficiencies in grooming and hygiene. A resident with diabetes was found with long, dirty fingernails and facial hair, while another resident with dementia was lying in a urine-saturated bed with significant facial hair growth. A third resident was observed with long facial hair and dirty fingernails. The DON confirmed the care plans were not followed, and the MDS Coordinator admitted there was no excuse for the lack of care.
A resident reported verbal abuse by a CNA, who threatened to run him over with her truck after he refused to throw something away. Witnesses confirmed the threat and observed the CNA backing up her vehicle while the resident was behind it. The resident, who is cognitively intact and has a spinal cord injury, reported the incident, leading to the CNA's suspension and an investigation that substantiated the abuse.
A resident in a LTC facility did not receive a shower, shave, or hair brushing for over two weeks despite expressing a preference for a shower upon admission. Observations showed the resident's hair and beard were unkempt, and fingernails were long with a dark substance underneath. Interviews with staff revealed no set shower schedule, and the Director of Nursing acknowledged the issue, recognizing it as a failure to honor the resident's right of choice.
The facility failed to maintain a homelike environment as broken blinds in several resident rooms compromised privacy. Observations revealed missing or broken slats in rooms, and staff interviews indicated a lack of formal documentation for maintenance needs. The Administrator and Maintenance Director were aware of the issue, but no actions were documented to address it.
A facility failed to implement a baseline care plan for a resident's personal hygiene preferences and needs. Despite the resident's preference for showers and requirement for assistance, he did not receive a shower, shave, or hair brushing since admission. The MDS Coordinator confirmed the care plan was not followed, leading to the deficiency.
The facility failed to provide adequate personal hygiene and grooming for four residents, resulting in deficiencies in their care. A resident was found with long, jagged fingernails and facial hair, while another was lying in a urine-saturated bed with a strong odor. Two other residents experienced similar neglect, with one not receiving a shower or grooming since admission. The facility lacked a shower schedule, and the DON acknowledged the issue of inadequate care.
A facility failed to accurately complete the MDS assessment for a resident by incorrectly coding anticoagulant medication usage. The MDS indicated the resident received anticoagulant medication for seven days, but the eMAR showed no such medication was administered during the observation period. The MDS Coordinator confirmed the error, noting the resident was not on anticoagulant medication. The resident had diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Pulmonary Edema, and Heart Failure.
Failure to Supervise Cognitively Impaired Resident Resulting in Elopement into Hazardous Area
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide adequate supervision and maintain an environment free from accident hazards for a cognitively impaired resident who exited the building and traveled into an uncontrolled, hazardous area without staff awareness. The facility had a policy titled "Wanderer Management, Monitoring System and Resident Elopement Protocol" which stated that all residents would be afforded adequate supervision to provide the safest environment possible. Despite this policy, a resident with a documented moderate risk for wandering and moderate cognitive impairment was able to leave the supervised area of the front porch, travel down the facility driveway, and cross a heavily trafficked road before staff intervened. Record review showed that the resident had been admitted with diagnoses including cerebral infarction and hemiplegia/hemiparesis affecting the right dominant side. A Nex-Wander Data Collection form dated several months prior documented a score of seven, indicating a moderate risk for wandering. A BIMS assessment completed on the date of the incident showed a score of nine, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Staff interviews revealed that the resident was typically on the front porch with other residents who smoked and drank coffee, and staff were usually present. On the day of the incident, a CNA reported seeing the resident on the front porch in a wheelchair drinking water shortly after 3:00 PM, but there was uncertainty about how the resident got outside and whether he may have followed another resident. At approximately 3:32 PM, a CNA who was leaving the facility was informed by a pest control representative that a resident in a wheelchair was heading toward the bottom of the driveway. By the time the CNA reached the resident, he had propelled his wheelchair down the driveway and across the facility drive into a grassy area, and the CNA observed him continue across the street despite attempts to get him to stop. The route later observed by the surveyor showed that the resident had traveled about one-half mile down the driveway and across a heavily trafficked road, where environmental hazards included a steep ditch and wooded area. The facility’s Interim DON confirmed that the resident had not previously wandered or attempted elopement. The State Agency determined that this lack of supervision and failure to prevent the resident’s unsupervised exit into a hazardous environment constituted noncompliance at F689 at an Immediate Jeopardy level, likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death.
Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions During PEG Tube Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to implement its Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy during PEG tube medication administration for one resident. The facility’s EBP policy, last reviewed on 6/30/25, defined EBP as an infection control intervention requiring targeted gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities, and specified that EBP are indicated for residents with indwelling medical devices, including feeding tubes. Signage posted outside the resident’s room indicated that EBP were in effect and instructed providers and staff to wear gloves and a gown during high-contact resident care activities, including device care and use involving a feeding tube. On the survey date at 9:00 AM, an LPN was observed administering medications via the resident’s Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube without donning a gown, contrary to the posted EBP instructions and facility policy. The resident had been admitted on 11/17/25 with diagnoses including an encounter for attention to gastrostomy, indicating the presence of a feeding tube. In a subsequent interview at 9:25 AM, the LPN stated that EBP were used to prevent the spread of infection, acknowledged that she did not wear a gown while administering the PEG tube medications, and agreed that she should have worn one. At 10:00 AM, the DON confirmed that her expectation was that the LPN would have worn a gown when administering medications through a PEG tube in accordance with EBP.
Failure to Document and Communicate Resident Transfer Needs on Baseline Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete a baseline care plan that included the minimum healthcare information necessary to provide effective, person-centered care for a newly admitted resident. Specifically, the baseline care plan and the bedside Kardex did not document the resident's transfer needs, despite the resident being dependent and requiring a total lift for transfers. This omission was confirmed through staff interviews and record reviews, which showed that the resident's transfer status was not assessed or communicated to staff at the time of admission. As a result of this incomplete documentation, the resident's transfer needs were not identified or communicated, leading to an incident where the resident sustained a laceration during a transfer from bed to chair. The injury was classified as a trauma injury and measured 4.5 cm by 5.5 cm by 0.2 cm. Staff interviews confirmed that the information regarding the resident's dependency and need for a total lift was not available on the Kardex or baseline care plan, and staff should have consulted the nurse supervisor for clarification.
Failure to Use Required Lift Results in Resident Injury During Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred safely in accordance with her assessed needs, resulting in a traumatic injury. Despite the resident being assessed as dependent for transfers and requiring a total lift, two staff members performed a manual transfer from bed to wheelchair without using the mechanical lift. The resident and her representative both informed staff that a lift was required, but staff proceeded to manually slide the resident, during which her legs and torso slipped downward and her right leg struck the exposed metal of the wheelchair armrest slot, causing a laceration. Staff involved in the transfer acknowledged not questioning the presence of a sling pad in the wheelchair and did not consult the nurse supervisor for clarification. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had a diagnosis of alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver with ascites, sustained a trauma laceration to her right leg, measured at 4.5 cm x 5.5 cm x 0.2 cm, as confirmed by the treatment nurse. The facility's policy required the licensed nurse to determine and communicate the level of assistance needed for safe transfers, but the resident's transfer status was not reflected on the Kardex for staff reference. The risk manager confirmed that the resident was not transferred according to her assessed needs and acknowledged that this failure could lead to accidents.
Resident Restrained with Sheets in Violation of Restraint-Free Policy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from physical restraints, as evidenced by an incident involving a resident diagnosed with unspecified dementia. The resident was admitted to the facility on December 5, 2024. On February 18, 2025, an allegation was reported that the resident was found restrained to her bed with sheets tied across her chest and legs. This was observed by a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), who immediately removed the restraints and reported the incident to the Director of Nursing (DON). The investigation revealed that the resident had been restrained for approximately five minutes by an LPN, who admitted to securing the sheets to prevent the resident from getting up unassisted, citing concerns about falls and the resident's previous attempts to ambulate without assistance. Despite the LPN's denial of using the sheets as restraints, witness statements and staff interviews confirmed that the resident was indeed tied to the bed, which constituted a violation of the facility's restraint-free policy. The facility's policy on personal safety devices clearly states that residents have the right to be free from physical restraints imposed for discipline or convenience. The incident was substantiated, and the LPN involved was terminated following the investigation. The resident was found to have no injuries from the incident, and the facility took immediate steps to address the situation and ensure compliance with their restraint-free policy.
Failure to Provide RN Coverage for Required Hours
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours on one of the 14 staffing days reviewed, specifically on December 25th. According to the facility's policy, an RN must be on duty for at least eight hours every day to handle emergencies and intravenous medications. However, on the specified date, there was no RN coverage. The Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed that the scheduled RN did not show up, and she was not notified of the absence until later in the day. The DON admitted that she did not come in to cover the shift, citing that everyone else was on vacation and agency RNs were not allowed for coverage. The Administrator confirmed the lack of RN coverage and stated that the DON had scheduled an RN who had already requested the day off. The DON acknowledged that she was responsible for the scheduling and was unaware of the RN's request for time off. Despite being informed by the RN about the prior request, the DON did not ensure coverage for the shift. There were no reported incidents or intravenous therapy needs on that day, but the absence of an RN was a violation of the facility's staffing policy.
Inaccurate PBJ Staffing Data Submission
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to submit accurate staffing data into the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system for the fourth quarter of 2024. The facility's policy, titled 'Reporting Direct-Care Staffing Information (Payroll-Based Journal)' dated October 2022, requires staffing data to include the number of hours worked each day by each staff member. However, a review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report CASPER for Fiscal Year Quarter 4 2024 revealed excessively low weekend staffing, indicating that the submitted weekend staffing data was excessively low. During an interview, the Administrator and the Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed that the data entered for the fourth quarter PBJ was incorrect and did not capture the full direct care hours. The DON disclosed that the issue arose from employees failing to clock out and in for weekend mealtimes, which affected their overall weekend hours.
Failure to Provide Written Transfer Notifications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide written transfer or discharge notifications to residents or their representatives for hospital transfers, as required by their policy. This deficiency was identified for three residents during a review of records and interviews with staff and residents. The facility's policy, last reviewed on 5/17/24, mandates that residents and their representatives receive written notification detailing the specific reasons for transfers. However, the Social Services Director admitted to not sending these notifications, indicating a lack of awareness of this requirement. Resident #8 was transferred to a hospital on 8/22/24 without receiving a written notification. Similarly, Resident #27, who is cognitively intact and his own responsible party, was transferred multiple times without receiving any written notifications. Resident #45 also experienced multiple hospital transfers without written notifications. Interviews with the Social Services Director and the Administrator confirmed the oversight, with the Administrator expressing an expectation that the Social Services Director should have provided the necessary notifications.
Failure to Provide Bed-Hold Notifications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide written bed-hold notifications to residents or their representatives following hospital transfers, as required by their policy. This deficiency was identified through staff and resident interviews, record reviews, and a review of the facility's policy titled 'Transfer or Discharge Documentation and Notice.' The policy mandates that residents and their representatives be notified in writing about the facility's bed-hold policy during transfers to a hospital or therapeutic leave. However, for three residents reviewed, no such notifications were provided. Resident #8, who was admitted with End Stage Renal Disease and Diastolic Congestive Heart Failure, was transferred to a hospital without receiving a bed-hold notice. Similarly, Resident #27, who is cognitively intact and responsible for his own decisions, was transferred multiple times without receiving the required notification. Resident #45, admitted with a diagnosis of Malignant Neoplasm of Glottis, also did not receive a bed-hold notice during hospital transfers. Interviews with Social Services and the Administrator revealed a lack of awareness and implementation of the policy, leading to the deficiency.
Inadequate Hand Hygiene During Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its infection prevention and control program, specifically in the area of hand hygiene during wound care. During an observation, a Registered Nurse (RN) was seen providing wound care to a resident with a Stage 4 pressure ulcer in the sacral region. The RN washed her hands and applied clean gloves after removing the resident's wound bandage. However, after cleaning the wound and applying Santyl ointment, the RN did not change her gloves or wash her hands between the dirty and clean procedures. This lapse in proper hand hygiene was confirmed by the RN and acknowledged as a potential cause of infection. The Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed that the facility's policy requires changing gloves and washing hands between dirty and clean wound treatment procedures. The failure to follow this policy was recognized as an infection control issue that could delay the healing process. The resident involved was admitted with a diagnosis that included a Stage 4 pressure ulcer of the sacral region, highlighting the critical need for stringent infection control practices to prevent further complications.
Failure to Implement Comprehensive Care Plans for Personal Hygiene
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement comprehensive care plans for personal hygiene for three residents, leading to deficiencies in their grooming and hygiene. Resident #17, who is cognitively intact and has medical diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, was observed with long, jagged fingernails with a brown substance underneath and long facial hair. The Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed that the resident's grooming needs were not met, as the nurses are responsible for nail care due to the resident's diabetes, and facial hair trimming is part of daily grooming. Resident #49, diagnosed with Unspecified Dementia and other conditions, was found lying in a bed saturated with urine, emitting a strong odor, and with significant facial hair growth. The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) confirmed the resident had not been changed by the night shift, and the DON acknowledged that the resident's hygiene plan was not followed. This indicates a failure in executing the care plan, which required the resident to be dependent on staff for personal hygiene and toileting. Resident #57, with a history of confusion and impaired balance, was observed with long facial hair and dirty, jagged fingernails. The DON confirmed the resident was not properly groomed, and the MDS Nurse stated that the care plans were not followed. The care plan required the resident to be dependent on staff for personal hygiene, including nail care due to diabetes. The MDS Coordinator admitted there was no excuse for the residents not receiving the care specified in their care plans.
Verbal Abuse Incident Involving CNA and Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from verbal abuse, as evidenced by an incident involving a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and a resident. On the morning of September 8, 2024, the resident reported that CNA #5 made a verbal threat towards him after he refused to throw something in the trash for her. The resident stated that CNA #5 threatened to run him over with her truck, and witnesses corroborated that she backed up her vehicle, screeched her tires, and left the parking lot while the resident was behind her in his motorized wheelchair. The facility's investigation substantiated the occurrence of verbal abuse. The resident involved, identified as Resident #60, was admitted to the facility with an unspecified injury at the T2-T6 level of the thoracic spinal cord and was cognitively intact, as indicated by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. The incident was reported to the facility's administrator, who confirmed the details and suspended CNA #5 pending investigation. The facility's policy on the prohibition of abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property emphasizes the residents' right to be free from abuse, mistreatment, and neglect, which was violated in this case.
Failure to Honor Resident's Shower Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor a resident's preferences, specifically for Resident #195, who had been in the facility for over two weeks without receiving a shower, shave, or hair brushing, despite expressing his preference for a shower upon admission. Observations revealed that the resident's hair and beard were unkempt and matted, and his fingernails were long with a dark brown substance underneath. The resident, who was unable to shower himself due to mobility issues, had repeatedly requested a shower from the staff, but his requests were not fulfilled. Interviews with facility staff, including CNAs and the Director of Nursing, confirmed that there was no set shower schedule in place, and the resident's shower had not been documented since admission. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the lack of a shower schedule and admitted awareness of the issue, recognizing it as a failure to honor the resident's right of choice. The resident's cognitive status was intact, as indicated by a BIMS score of 13, and he had expressed that choosing a bath or shower was very important to him.
Facility Fails to Maintain Homelike Environment Due to Broken Blinds
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment as evidenced by broken blinds or window coverings in several resident rooms. During a survey, it was observed that rooms 203, 505, 601, and 607 had broken or missing slats on window blinds, which compromised the privacy of the residents as the rooms were visible from outside the building. The facility's policy on maintaining a homelike environment was not adhered to, as the broken blinds were not promptly repaired or replaced. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of formal documentation and communication regarding maintenance needs. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) acknowledged the broken blinds but admitted to forgetting to report the issue due to other responsibilities. The Administrator and Maintenance Director were aware of the problem, with the Administrator conducting daily rounds and the Maintenance Director confirming the arrival of replacement blinds. However, there was no documentation of maintenance requests or actions taken to address the issue, leading to the deficiency in maintaining a homelike environment for the residents.
Failure to Implement Baseline Care Plan for Resident's Hygiene Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement a baseline care plan for a resident, specifically regarding preferences and personal hygiene care. The baseline care plan, dated 12/21/24, indicated that the resident preferred showers and required assistance with bathing and personal hygiene. However, an observation and interview with the resident on 1/6/25 revealed that he had not received a shower, shave, or hair brushing since his admission, despite expressing his preferences to the staff during admission. The resident's hair was matted, and his fingernails were unkempt, indicating a lack of personal hygiene care. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator confirmed that the care plan was not implemented as the staff did not provide the necessary assistance with bathing and personal hygiene, which was required to meet the resident's needs. The resident, who was admitted with a diagnosis of Acute Kidney Failure, was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13. The MDS assessment indicated that the resident required substantial assistance with showering and supervision or touching assistance for personal hygiene, which was not provided, leading to the deficiency.
Deficiencies in Personal Hygiene and Grooming
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate personal hygiene and grooming for four residents, leading to deficiencies in their care. Resident #17 was observed with long, jagged fingernails and facial hair, which had not been attended to despite the resident's request for grooming. The Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed that the nurses were responsible for trimming the resident's nails due to her diabetes, and the lack of grooming could lead to skin concerns. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) admitted to not having a set schedule for nail care, resulting in the resident's neglected appearance. Resident #49 was found lying in a urine-saturated bed with a strong odor, indicating that he had not been changed for a significant period. The CNA assigned to him admitted to not changing his brief due to being busy with other tasks, and the DON acknowledged the issue of inadequate care. Additionally, the resident had not been groomed, with noticeable facial hair growth, which was confirmed by the Administrator as unacceptable. Resident #57 and Resident #195 also experienced similar neglect in personal hygiene. Resident #57 had long, dirty fingernails and unshaven facial hair, with the DON confirming the lack of grooming. Resident #195, who had been in the facility for over two weeks, reported not receiving a shower or grooming since admission. The facility lacked a shower schedule, and the DON admitted to being aware of the problem but had not implemented a solution. These observations highlight the facility's failure to adhere to its policy on supporting activities of daily living, resulting in inadequate care for the residents.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Anticoagulant Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately complete Section N of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a resident, specifically regarding the coding of anticoagulant medication usage. During the 7-day observation look-back period, the MDS indicated that the resident received anticoagulant medication for seven days. However, a review of the Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) revealed that the resident did not receive any anticoagulant medication during this period. An interview with the MDS Coordinator confirmed that the resident was incorrectly coded as receiving anticoagulant medication, acknowledging it was an error. The resident, admitted with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Pulmonary Edema, and Heart Failure, was not on anticoagulant medication during the specified observation period.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 17 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Vicksburg
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shady Lawn Health And Rehabilitation | 0.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Heritage House Nursing Center | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
| Vicksburg Convalescent Center | 2.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Legacy Nursing And Rehabilitation Of Tallulah | 19.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Claiborne County Senior Care | 26.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for The Bluffs Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.