Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around September 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at The Orchards At Armada during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with a chronic right lower extremity ulcer experienced progressive wound deterioration after a wound vac was replaced with an Unna boot, with documentation of increasing pain, edema, warmth, erythema, foul-smelling drainage, necrosis, and new lesions. Although the primary MD adjusted antibiotics and ordered detailed wound care, and nursing and wound care staff noted worsening signs of infection, the facility did not document any contact with the outside wound care specialist directing the resident’s wound care. The Treatment Administration Record lacked documentation of wound treatments, and interviews confirmed that facility staff understood it was their responsibility to notify the consulting specialist but did not do so until the resident’s next follow-up visit, when the specialist sent the resident to the ER for a wound infection.
Surveyors observed that the required circuit breaker locking device was not installed in the circuit breaker panel for the fire alarm booster module in the Mechanical Room (Memory Care). This deficiency was confirmed by the Maintenance Director and could impact all residents in the facility.
Surveyors found that the required evacuation map was missing in the Maple Ridge corridor, which is necessary for identifying locations and evacuation routes. This deficiency was confirmed with the Maintenance Director and could impact 26 of 64 residents during an emergency evacuation.
A volunteer was observed standing while feeding a resident with dementia and dysphagia and intermittently assisting another resident, contrary to the care plan and facility policy requiring one-to-one, seated feeding assistance to maintain dignity.
A resident receiving daily IV antibiotics via a PICC line was found with a dressing that included gauze under a transparent covering, which had not been changed according to facility policy. During IV medication administration, a nurse was observed attempting to connect tubing containing multiple air bubbles, which was only corrected after noticing the issue. The DON confirmed that both the dressing change interval and air bubble management did not meet professional standards of practice.
Two residents experienced lapses in infection prevention and control when a nurse failed to use required PPE during PICC line care and a volunteer did not perform hand hygiene between assisting residents during meals, contrary to facility policy and established protocols.
The facility failed to ensure opened food items were properly dated and discarded when expired, and did not maintain the ice machine filter. Several undated and expired food items were found in the kitchen and resident refrigerator, and ants were observed in the activity cabinet.
A facility failed to revise the care plan for a resident with Dysphagia and Aphasia. The resident, with impaired cognition, was observed eating without required assistance and had fluids with a straw at bedside, contrary to the care plan. The Registered Dietitian confirmed a change in liquid intake, but the care plan was not updated.
The facility failed to provide necessary meal assistance and proper positioning for two residents, resulting in inadequate nutritional intake and care. One resident was left unattended with uneaten meals despite needing help, while another did not receive the required 1:1 feeding assistance as per their diet order.
The facility failed to apply heel protectors and lids to drinks per physician orders for a resident with muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, and impaired cognition. Despite staff education and physician orders, the resident was repeatedly observed without heel protectors and with drinks that did not have lids.
A resident with an indwelling urinary catheter was observed multiple times without a leg strap to secure the catheter, and the drainage tubing was often found looped and on the floor. Despite the facility's policy requiring securement and proper positioning, these guidelines were not followed, leading to deficiencies in care.
The facility failed to provide timely assistance to residents, with multiple instances of call lights being activated for extended periods without response. Residents reported frequent delays of over an hour for assistance, and staff interviews confirmed that the facility was often understaffed, particularly on weekends. Observations and schedule reviews corroborated these findings, highlighting significant delays in meeting residents' needs.
The facility failed to administer medications per manufacturer recommendations and physician orders, resulting in a 7.89% medication error rate. An LPN administered cholestyramine with other medications, did not administer Doptelet as prescribed, and substituted a Lidoderm patch with a menthol patch without a physician's order.
The facility failed to provide a resident with food items in a puree consistency as prescribed. Observations revealed the resident was given scrambled eggs, oatmeal, hard pretzels, and a regular piece of frosted cake, none of which were consumed. The diet order specified a pureed texture and thin liquid consistency, which was not followed.
A facility failed to wear proper PPE for a resident under Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). An RN was observed entering and exiting the resident's room without appropriate PPE, despite an EBP sign and cart being present. The resident had a history of chronic urinary tract infections and required assistance with bed mobility and transfers. The RN was unaware of the specific reason for the EBP, indicating a lapse in following infection control protocols.
Failure to Notify Consulting Wound Specialist of Worsening Wound Condition
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to notify and consult the outside wound care clinic consulting specialist (WCCCS) regarding a resident’s deteriorating right lower extremity wound, despite clear signs of infection and decline. The resident was admitted with a chronic ulcer of the right ankle and varicose veins of the right lower extremity with ulcer, and initially had a wound vac in place per the WCCCS. After a follow-up visit, the wound vac was removed and an Unna boot was ordered. In the days that followed, clinical documentation showed increasing edema, redness, warmth, and an elevated white blood cell count, and the primary medical doctor (PMD) changed antibiotics and ordered specific wound care treatments while noting they had spoken with the WCCCS about the plan of care. However, there was no documentation that the facility actually consulted or updated the WCCCS about the wound’s deterioration during this period. Progress notes over the next several days documented the resident’s increasing pain, edema, warmth, drainage, erythema, foul-smelling yellowish drainage, saturated dressings, and surrounding redness and warmth suggestive of cellulitis and wound infection. A wound care nurse later documented increased ulceration, slough/necrosis, heavy serous and purulent drainage, bright yellow thick purulence expressed with light pressure, and a new purple fluid-filled lesion with peri-wound erythema and pain, with notification only to the wound care nurse practitioner. Interviews with the PMD and wound care nurse practitioner confirmed that they did not assume responsibility for contacting the outside consulting provider and that it was the facility’s responsibility to notify the WCCCS of wound deterioration. The clinical record lacked documentation of any wound treatments on the Treatment Administration Record for the month and contained no evidence that the WCCCS was consulted about the worsening wound until the resident’s subsequent follow-up visit, when the WCCCS sent the resident to the emergency room for a wound infection.
Missing Circuit Breaker Locking Device for Fire Alarm Booster Module
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the fire alarm system was tested and maintained in accordance with an approved program that complies with NFPA 70 and NFPA 72. During an observation in the Mechanical Room (Memory Care), it was found that the required circuit breaker locking device was not provided in the circuit breaker panel for the installed fire alarm booster module. This omission was confirmed through an interview with the facility Maintenance Director at the time of observation. The lack of the locking device could potentially allow for unauthorized tampering with the fire alarm system, and this deficiency could affect all 64 residents in the facility.
Plan Of Correction
ELEMENT 1 The circuit breaker locking device has been placed on in the circuit breaker panel in the Mechanical room on Orchard View. ELEMENT 2 The Maintenance Director and/or designee did an audit on all circuit breaker panels in the facility to ensure there is a locking device present. Any areas of noncompliance were addressed immediately. ELEMENT 3 The Maintenance Director has been reeducated to ensure that the required circuit breaker locking device in the circuit breaker panel mechanical room for our installed fire alarm booster module on Orchard View is present. ELEMENT 4 The Maintenance Director/designee will conduct weekly audits for 2 months to ensure that the required circuit breaker locking device in the circuit breaker panel mechanical room for our installed fire alarm booster module on Orchard View is present. ELEMENT 5 Date of compliance 06/27/2025. The Maintenance Director and/or designee will be responsible for sustained compliance.
Missing Evacuation Map in Corridor
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide the required evacuation map in the Maple Ridge corridor, as observed during a survey. The evacuation map is necessary to identify locations within the facility and to highlight designated evacuation routes to the exterior of the building. This deficiency was confirmed through observation and interview with the Maintenance Director. The lack of an evacuation map could affect 26 of 64 residents in the event of a fire or other emergency requiring area evacuation. Employees were not periodically instructed in their duties under the evacuation plan as required by regulatory standards, and the written plan for the protection and evacuation of all residents was not fully implemented in this area.
Plan Of Correction
ELEMENT 1 On 6/27/25 an evacuation map was placed on Autum Ridge to identify the current location within the facility and highlight designated evacuation routes to the exterior of the facility. ELEMENT 2 Rounds were conducted by the Maintenance Director and/or designee on all fire corridors to ensure there are evacuation maps present. ELEMENT 3 The Maintenance Director has been reeducated on maintaining evacuation maps throughout the building in all fire corridors. ELEMENT 4 The Maintenance Director/designee will conduct weekly audits for 1 month to ensure all fire corridors have the required evacuation maps. ELEMENT 5 Date of compliance 06/27/2025. The Maintenance Director and/or designee will be responsible for sustained compliance.
Failure to Provide Dignified Feeding Assistance
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a volunteer was observed providing feeding assistance to a resident with dementia and dysphagia in the memory care unit dining room. The volunteer stood while feeding the resident and intermittently attended to another resident, rather than providing dedicated one-to-one assistance. The resident's care plan and physician orders specified the need for one-to-one feeding assistance, aspiration precautions, and that the resident should remain upright in a chair during feeding. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility's expectation is for staff to sit with residents while providing one-to-one feeding assistance and to avoid assisting more than one resident at a time to maintain dignity. Facility policy also directs staff not to stand while feeding residents. The observed actions did not align with these expectations or the resident's care plan, resulting in a failure to provide feeding assistance in a dignified manner.
Plan Of Correction
ELEMENT 1 Resident R15 still resides in the facility and continues to be assisted with feeding by staff and/or volunteers that have been reeducated to stay seated while assisting to feed as well as only assisting one resident at a time. ELEMENT 2 Residents that reside in the facility have the potential to be affected. An audit was done on residents residing in the facility that require assistance with meals to ensure they are being assisted by a staff member and/or volunteer that remains seated and only assisting one resident at a time. Any areas of deficiency at the time of the audit will be corrected immediately. ELEMENT 3 The Resident Rights policy was reviewed by the DON and the Administrator and deemed appropriate. The staff and volunteers were reeducated on remaining seated while assisting residents with eating as well as assisting one resident at a time. ELEMENT 4 The DON and/or designee will conduct random audits 2 times a week for 2 months to ensure that staff and/or volunteers are staying seated while assisting residents with meals as well as only assisting one resident at a time. Any areas of deficiency at the time of the audits will be corrected immediately, and the results of these audits will be presented at the facility's QAPI for further recommendations and/or corrective actions. ELEMENT 5 Date of compliance 06/27/2025. The Administrator and/or designee will be responsible for sustained compliance.
Failure to Follow Professional Standards for PICC Line Care and IV Administration
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a resident with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line for daily intravenous (IV) antibiotic administration was observed to have a dressing that included a folded white gauze under a transparent covering, dated several days prior. The resident confirmed that the dressing was being changed weekly, despite receiving daily IV antibiotics. Review of the Treatment Administration Record and Medication Administration Record indicated the last dressing change occurred several days before the observation. Facility policy required site care every 72 hours and as necessary, and the Director of Nursing confirmed that a gauze dressing should be changed within 48 hours. Additionally, the presence of gauze under the transparent dressing prevented direct assessment of the insertion site for signs of infection. During an observed IV medication administration, a registered nurse donned gloves, cleaned and flushed the PICC line, and began to connect the IV tubing. Multiple air bubbles were observed in the tubing, which the nurse noticed and then replaced the tubing before completing the administration. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that air bubbles should be drained prior to connecting IV tubing. These actions demonstrated a failure to follow professional standards of practice for PICC line care and IV medication administration, as required by facility policy and regulatory standards.
Plan Of Correction
Element 1 R42 no longer resides at the facility. Element 2 The residents that reside in the facility have the potential to be affected. An audit was completed on the residents residing in the facility that have PICC lines to ensure when a gauze dressing is used it is to be changed to no longer than 48 hours; and when priming IV lines that contain excessive air bubbles must be consistent with professional standards of practice. Any areas of deficiency at the time of the audit will be corrected immediately. Element 3 The IV Therapy policy was reviewed by the DON and ADON/IC and updated to our pharmacy's "Catheter Insertion and Care" policy and deemed appropriate. The nurses were reeducated on the Pharmacy's policy to ensure when gauze dressings are used, they are to be changed no longer than 48 hours, and when priming IV lines that contain excessive air bubbles must be consistent with professional standards of practice, i.e., fluid must run through the line into a waste receptacle until air is gone or acquire new IV tubing. Element 4 The DON and/or designee will conduct random audits twice a week for 2 months, to ensure nurses are following the "Catheter Insertion and Care". Any areas of deficiency at the time of the audits will be corrected immediately, and the results of these audits will be presented at the facility's QAPI for further review and/or corrective action. Element 5 Date of compliance 06/27/25. The Administrator and/or designee will be responsible for sustained compliance.
Deficient Infection Control in Central Line Care and Meal Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper infection prevention and control measures were followed during the care of two residents. In one instance, a registered nurse (RN) administered IV medication to a resident with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line without donning a gown, as required by enhanced barrier precautions. The RN was observed entering the resident's room, which had signage indicating the need for a gown and gloves, but only donned gloves that were taken from their pocket, a practice acknowledged by the RN as an old habit. The resident in question had been admitted with diagnoses including osteomyelitis, discitis, and hepatitis C, and was under enhanced barrier precautions due to the central line. The Director of Nursing (DON) and Infection Control Nurse confirmed that gloves should not be stored in staff pockets and that both gown and gloves are required for such care activities. In another instance, a volunteer providing one-to-one feeding assistance to a resident with dementia and dysphagia failed to perform hand hygiene between assisting the assigned resident and another resident during meal service. The volunteer was observed setting down the resident's utensil, assisting another resident, and then returning to the original resident without washing hands in between. The DON stated that the expectation is for staff providing one-to-one feeding assistance not to assist other residents, but if they do, hand hygiene must be performed between residents. Facility policy on hand hygiene specifically requires hand washing with soap and water before and after assisting a resident with meals. A review of facility policies revealed clear requirements for infection control, including the use of enhanced barrier precautions for central line care and strict hand hygiene protocols during resident meal assistance. Despite these policies and staff training, the observed actions did not align with the established standards, resulting in deficiencies in infection prevention and control practices for the residents involved.
Plan Of Correction
Element 1 R42 no longer resides at the facility, and R15 continues to be assisted by staff and/or volunteers who have been reeducated to perform hand hygiene before and after assisting a resident with meals. Element 2 Residents that reside in the facility have the potential to be affected. An audit was done on the residents with PICC lines to ensure the staff are adhering to Enhanced Barrier Precautions and donning and doffing the appropriate PPE prior to performing any procedures for the PICC line. An audit was done on the residents that require assistance with meals to ensure staff and volunteers only assist one resident at a time and perform hand hygiene before and after assisting any resident. Any areas of deficiencies at the time of the audits will be corrected immediately. Element 3 The Enhanced Barrier Precaution and Hand Hygiene policies were reviewed by the DON and ADON/IC and deemed appropriate. The nurses were re-educated on the Enhanced Barrier Precaution policy and procedures regarding appropriate PPE when taking care of a PICC line. Staff and volunteers were re-educated on the Hand Hygiene policy regarding assistance with meals. Element 4 The ADON/IC and/or designee will complete random audits twice a week for 2 months to ensure nurses are Donning and Doffing appropriate PPE per our policy and procedures while caring for a PICC line. The Administrator and/or designee will complete random audits twice a week for 2 months to ensure that staff and/or volunteers are only assisting one resident at a time and using proper hand hygiene before and after assisting residents with meals. Any areas of deficiencies at the time of the audits will be addressed immediately, and the results of these audits will be presented at the facility's QAPI for further recommendations and/or corrective action. Element 5 Date of compliance 06/27/25. The Administrator and/or designee will be responsible for sustained compliance.
Failure to Properly Date and Discard Food Items and Maintain Ice Machine Filter
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that opened food items were properly dated and discarded when expired, and did not maintain the filter for the ice machine. During a tour of the kitchen, several opened food items were found without proper dating, including deli turkey, salami, Caesar dressing, and enchilada sauce. Additionally, an unlabeled bin of white powder, identified as thickener, was found in the dry storage room. The ice machine filter was also found to be outdated. In the resident refrigerator, a container of cut pineapple with an expired use-by date and an undated container of chicken soup were observed. Ants were found crawling on the activity cabinet next to the resident refrigerator. The Dietary Manager confirmed that the undated and expired food items should be discarded and that the thickener should be labeled. The facility's policy on the safe storage and handling of outside food was reviewed, noting that any food not consumed immediately must be covered and labeled with the resident's name and date. The presence of ants in the activity cabinet was acknowledged by the activity staff, who stated they would inform Maintenance. These deficiencies were identified based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted by the surveyors.
Failure to Revise Care Plan for Resident with Dysphagia and Aphasia
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise the care plan for a resident diagnosed with Dysphagia following Cerebral Infarction and Aphasia. The resident, who had an impaired cognition score of 2/15, was observed attempting to eat pureed food without the required 1:1 assistance. Additionally, the resident was repeatedly observed with fluids and a straw at their bedside, contrary to the care plan's intervention of no straws and no fluids at bedside. The Registered Dietitian confirmed that the resident's liquid intake had been changed to thin liquids, but the care plan was not updated to reflect this change, violating the facility's policy on re-evaluating and modifying care plans as necessary to reflect changes in care, service, and treatment.
Failure to Provide Meal Assistance and Proper Positioning
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure meal assistance and proper positioning for two residents, leading to deficiencies in their care. Resident R53 was repeatedly observed in a supine position, leaning to one side, with uneaten meal trays left untouched. Despite being frail, underweight, and requiring assistance with eating, staff did not provide the necessary help or encouragement. The resident's care plan lacked specific instructions for meal assistance, and staff failed to monitor and assist the resident adequately, resulting in poor nutritional intake over several days. Resident R56, diagnosed with dysphagia and aphasia, was observed attempting to eat without the required 1:1 feeding assistance. Despite a diet order specifying the need for slow feeding with small bites, no staff were present to assist during multiple observations. Interviews with staff revealed inconsistencies in understanding and implementing the resident's dietary needs, with some staff stating the resident could self-feed with cues, while others noted the resident's refusal to be fed. The facility's policies on resident assistance during meals and comprehensive care planning were not followed, leading to inadequate care for both residents. The lack of proper assistance and monitoring during meals, as well as the failure to update and implement care plans, contributed to the observed deficiencies in the residents' care.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Heel Protectors and Drink Lids
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to apply heel protectors and lids to drinks per physician orders for one resident. On multiple occasions, the resident was observed in bed without heel protectors and with drinks that did not have lids, despite physician orders requiring these measures. The resident, who has muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, and impaired cognition, was noted to have their heels resting on the mattress without protection and was provided beverages without lids or handles. These observations were made over several days, indicating a consistent failure to follow physician orders. Interviews with staff revealed that the resident often refuses to wear heel protectors, but this refusal was not documented as required. The Director of Nursing confirmed that staff had been educated on the importance of ensuring drinks have lids and that heel protectors are used, but these measures were not consistently implemented. The facility did not provide a specific policy related to following physician orders, stating it was standard practice.
Failure to Ensure Proper Catheter Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper care for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter. The resident was observed multiple times without a leg strap to secure the catheter, and the drainage tubing was often found looped and on the floor. This improper positioning and lack of securement were noted over several days, despite the resident's dependency on staff for personal hygiene and toileting. The resident reported needing to urinate and have a bowel movement, and the incontinence brief appeared tight and stretched, further complicating the situation. The Licensed Practical Nurse confirmed the absence of a securement device and improper positioning of the catheter tubing. The facility's policy on indwelling catheter care emphasizes the importance of inspecting the catheter and tubing to prevent obstructions and ensuring the drainage tube and collection bag are lower than the bladder at all times. The policy also requires the use of a leg band to secure the catheter and prevent tension on the tubing. Despite these guidelines, the facility did not adhere to its own policy, leading to the observed deficiencies. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the issues and indicated that corrective actions would have been taken, but these were not implemented at the time of the observations.
Failure to Provide Timely Assistance and Adequate Staffing
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely assistance to meet the needs of residents, as evidenced by multiple instances of delayed response to call lights and insufficient staffing levels. On several occasions, residents reported waiting for an hour or more for assistance after activating their call lights. For example, one resident reported frequent delays of over an hour for assistance, and another resident's call light was observed to be on for nearly 30 minutes before receiving help. These delays were corroborated by observations and interviews with staff and visitors, who noted that staffing levels were often insufficient, particularly on weekends, leading to extended wait times for residents needing assistance. During the survey, multiple call lights were observed to be activated for extended periods without timely response from staff. One resident was found to be visibly diaphoretic and uncomfortable after waiting for nearly 30 minutes for assistance with toileting. Another resident, who required a mechanical lift and two-person assistance to transfer into their wheelchair, reported waiting for over an hour to be helped out of bed. The facility's call station monitor confirmed these extended wait times, with several call lights remaining activated for over 20 minutes. Interviews with staff revealed that the facility was frequently understaffed, with CNAs responsible for managing up to 23 residents each. Staff reported that having three CNAs on duty made the workload more manageable, but this was not consistently the case. A review of the facility's schedule and time punch data confirmed that staffing levels were often inadequate, particularly on weekends, leading to delays in meeting residents' needs. Despite the facility's policy that resident needs should be met within 20 minutes, this standard was not consistently upheld, resulting in significant delays in care.
Medication Administration Errors
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure medications were administered per manufacturer recommendations and physician orders for one resident, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.89 percent. During a medication pass observation, an LPN administered cholestyramine along with other medications to a resident, contrary to guidelines that recommend avoiding concurrent administration with other oral medications. Additionally, the resident was prescribed Doptelet, which had not been administered since the beginning of the month, and a Lidoderm patch, which was substituted with a menthol patch without a physician's order at the time of administration. The LPN confirmed the lack of Lidoderm patches in supply and reported the substitution practice to the DON, who later obtained an order to change the prescription to the menthol patch. The DON also addressed the administration schedule for Doptelet, which was to be provided by the resident's family. The facility did not provide a policy or protocol for cholestyramine administration when requested by the surveyors.
Failure to Provide Pureed Diet as Prescribed
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food items were provided in a puree consistency per the diet order for a resident. On multiple occasions, the resident was observed with food items that did not match the prescribed pureed diet, including scrambled eggs, oatmeal, a regular-sized bag of hard pretzels, and a regular cubed piece of frosted cake. These observations were made over two days, and it was noted that the resident had not consumed any of the provided food or liquids. The resident's medical record indicated a diet order for a regular diet with pureed texture and thin liquid consistency, dated earlier in the month. The Director of Nursing and the Registered Dietitian confirmed that the items observed were not part of a pureed diet. The facility's policy on assisting residents with eating emphasized the importance of verifying that the diet served is correct, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Wear Proper PPE for Resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to wear proper personal protective equipment (PPE) for a resident under Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). On 5/21/2024, a Registered Nurse (RN) was observed entering and exiting the resident's room without wearing the appropriate PPE, despite an EBP sign and cart being present. The resident had a history of chronic urinary tract infections and required assistance with bed mobility and transfers. The RN was unaware of the specific reason for the EBP, indicating a lack of proper adherence to infection control protocols. The Infection Control Preventionist confirmed that all staff had been educated on EBP requirements, yet the deficiency occurred, highlighting a lapse in following the facility's policy on Enhanced Barrier Precautions.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 345 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Armada
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wellbridge Of Romeo | 6.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Medilodge Of Richmond | 6.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Orchard Grove Health Campus | 7 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| The Village Of East Harbor | 13.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Michigan Veterans Home Of Chesterfield Township | 13.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for The Orchards At Armada.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.