Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Maine Veterans Home - Bangor during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Resident dignity was compromised when treatments labeled with room numbers and specific body areas, including sensitive locations, were left unattended in a corridor accessible to residents and visitors. An RN-Charge Nurse confirmed dispensing and labeling the treatments before leaving them out for C.N.A.s.
Surveyors found that the dining and kitchenette areas had multiple maintenance and cleanliness issues, including soiled metal molding, cracked and uncleanable floor tiles, heavily dust-laden ceiling air vents, and a damaged protective plastic panel with sharp edges at the nurse's station. These deficiencies were confirmed during a tour with a Maintenance Assistant.
The facility failed to follow its med admin policy for insulin for two residents. For one resident, Lantus orders and TAR entries showed second-person verification occurred on the prior shift, hours before the scheduled dose, and the DON said the night shift dialed up the insulin pen dose for the next nurse to verify and give. During an observation, an RN stated the night shift had already set the insulin pen dose for another resident, and the surveyor saw the pen was pre-set when opened.
A ware washer in the D-Unit kitchenette was not maintained in safe operating condition. A surveyor observed a wet bath blanket on the floor in front of the washer, and when a FSW loaded dirty dishes and turned it on, hot, steaming water spewed from the bottom of the washer door onto the towel. Staff stated the dishwasher had been leaking for a while and that towels were being used on the floor because of the leak.
A resident admitted with Type 1 DM on insulin and ESRD requiring dialysis did not have a Baseline Care Plan developed and implemented within 48 hours of admission. The clinical record lacked evidence of problems, goals, and interventions for monitoring and treatment of the resident’s diabetes, insulin use, or dialysis needs, and the B-unit manager stated the facility did not create a separate baseline care plan from the comprehensive care plan.
A resident with Type 1 DM on insulin and ESRD on dialysis did not have a Comprehensive Care Plan that addressed the resident’s diabetes monitoring, insulin treatment, or AV fistula/dialysis-related care. The record included orders for BG checks, insulin, and daily fistula monitoring, but the care plan lacked documented problems, goals, and interventions for these needs; the B-unit manager confirmed the plan was not developed and implemented.
Failure to follow insulin orders for two residents. An RN administered a higher-than-ordered dose of Insulin Aspart to one resident, and another resident received full Lantus doses instead of the ordered 1/2 doses when BS readings were below the threshold specified in the orders. The DON confirmed the record did not show the correct dosing based on BS results.
The facility failed to maintain infection control when a wet bath blanket was left on the floor in front of the ware washer in the D-Unit kitchenette after hot water spewed from the washer door onto it, and the blanket remained there during a later observation. In a separate medication pass, a CNA-M popped a pill from a med card, let it fall onto paper on the med cart, then picked it up with bare hands and placed it into the medication cup with the other meds.
Incomplete and Inaccurate Resident Record Documentation: A resident’s clinical record contained Third Eye Health paperwork with mixed patient information, including the resident’s name on one page and another person’s name on another page. The D Unit Manager stated the document belonged to a non-resident, and the Administrator confirmed staff could have caught the error when filing if all pages had been reviewed.
A resident with dementia and under guardianship was not assessed for capacity to consent to sexual activity with another resident known for hypersexual behaviors, resulting in unreported incidents of potential sexual abuse. Additionally, a CNA repeatedly verbally and physically abused multiple residents, including using profane language and forceful handling, with one resident sustaining a significant bruise. The facility failed to intervene or report these incidents in a timely manner, leading to immediate jeopardy.
Staff did not promptly report or investigate multiple allegations of psychological, physical, verbal, and sexual abuse, as well as an injury of unknown origin. A CNA failed to report observed abuse by another CNA for several weeks, and an injury with significant bruising was not reported or investigated. Additionally, a potential sexual abuse incident and signs of resident fear were not reported to authorities as required.
A resident was found with a large bruise on the back of the right hip/upper thigh, and the facility did not investigate the injury of unknown origin. Clinical records lacked documentation of any investigation, and this omission was confirmed by a Unit Manager RN during interview.
A resident with a history of sexually inappropriate behaviors had physician orders requiring case review by a specific doctor and medication adjustments. The facility did not provide evidence that the case was ever presented to the doctor as ordered, nor was there documentation of follow-up, despite ongoing behavioral issues and changes in care.
A resident with vascular dementia had a care plan that addressed potential sexual behaviors but did not include a goal or consider the resident's cognitive ability to consent to sexual activity. The care plan was not updated or implemented to reflect the resident's needs related to their dementia diagnosis.
The facility was found deficient in food storage and pest control practices. Wet stacked bowls and fruit flies near a floor drain were observed in the kitchen, and expired milk was found during a meal observation, confirmed by an RN.
The facility failed to maintain accurate and complete documentation of neurological assessments for three residents who experienced falls. Assessments were not documented in the electronic medical record at the time they occurred, with significant delays and inconsistencies noted. In one case, assessments were discarded before being recorded, leading to incomplete medical records.
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program, with 60 documented facility-acquired infections over three months lacking analysis or follow-up. Interviews revealed no efforts to identify trends or root causes. Additionally, a CNA was observed using a shared glucometer on two residents without cleaning it between uses, despite having cleaning supplies available.
The facility failed to implement its Antibiotic Stewardship Program, as required by its policy, to optimize antibiotic use and prevent infections. Infection reports showed numerous facility-acquired infections treated with antibiotics without evidence of review or discussion. Interviews revealed that the DON and IP did not analyze trends or discuss antibiotic use in QAPI meetings, and many prescriptions did not meet criteria.
The facility failed to maintain resident dignity during meal service, with staff standing while assisting residents due to a lack of chairs and significant delays in serving meals. A resident's request for a specific meal was unmet, and an LPN publicly discussed their medical details. Two residents were served last at their table during breakfast, indicating disorganized meal service.
A facility failed to notify the State mental health authority for PASRR after admitting a resident with PTSD and anxiety disorder. The resident's PASRR evaluation, completed by the hospital, indicated no level II was required, despite the mental health diagnoses. The PASRR was not updated to include these diagnoses, and the oversight was confirmed by a Licensed Social Worker.
A facility failed to update a care plan to address the hearing needs of a resident with a hearing deficit. Despite the resident's requirement for hearing aids and an ENT referral for ear issues, the care plan lacked specific goals and interventions for hearing loss. The DON confirmed the omission during an interview.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment experienced two unwitnessed falls, and the facility failed to complete the required neurological assessments. Despite hearing the falls, staff did not document follow-up assessments in the electronic medical record, contrary to facility policy. The DON confirmed the lack of documentation and adherence to post-fall procedures.
A resident with dementia and abnormal weight loss experienced a significant decline in weight over several months, dropping from 111.4 to 100 pounds. Despite the care plan noting potential for unintended weight loss, the facility did not notify the medical provider or dietitian, nor initiate nutritional interventions.
A resident experienced significant weight loss over four months, dropping from 111.4 lbs to 100.0 lbs, without evidence of physician supervision or evaluation. The clinical record lacked documentation of provider notification or progress notes addressing the weight loss, as confirmed by a surveyor during an interview with the B Unit Manager.
A facility did not timely follow up on pharmacist recommendations for a resident's PRN Trazodone order. The order, placed without a specified duration, was not discontinued until several weeks after the pharmacist advised limiting PRN antidepressants to 14 days unless documented otherwise by the prescriber.
The facility failed to complete AIMS tests for two residents when antipsychotic medication doses were changed or initiated, as per policy. Additionally, a resident received a PRN antidepressant without a documented duration or rationale, violating the 14-day limit requirement. These deficiencies were confirmed during reviews with the ADON and B Unit Manager.
A facility failed to document and administer a pneumococcal vaccine to a resident who had signed a consent form. The resident's clinical record showed a signed consent, but there was no evidence of the vaccine being given. The Education Coordinator confirmed the oversight during an interview.
A resident's medications were not administered according to physician orders, with Levothyroxine given after the prescribed time and Sinemet doses not aligned with specified schedules, sometimes being administered with meals. The resident's family raised concerns about the timing of Parkinson's medication, which was confirmed by the DON.
A facility failed to provide dignified feeding assistance to a resident. A CNA placed a breakfast tray in front of a resident and walked away without assisting. After 26 minutes, the CNA returned, fed the resident two bites, and left again. The CNA later collected the uneaten tray without speaking to the resident. This was discussed with the DON and ADON.
A resident with dementia and dysphagia, requiring assistance with eating, did not receive the care outlined in their care plan. The CNA placed a meal tray in front of the resident and left, later returning to offer food without following the care plan's instructions to alternate bites with liquids or reheat the food. The resident refused the food, and the CNA did not attempt to reapproach or offer fluids, eventually removing the uneaten tray without further interaction.
A resident with dementia and severe agitation was physically abused by a C.N.A. who held the resident's arms down during care, causing bruising. The resident accused the C.N.A. of throwing them around, and other staff confirmed the bruises were not present the day before. The facility's Abuse Policy defines such actions as physical abuse.
Resident Dignity Compromised by Improper Handling of Treatments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain resident dignity and respect by leaving resident treatments, labeled with room numbers and specific body areas to be treated, unattended in a corridor accessible to all residents and visitors. During a tour of the D-Unit, three medication cups and two packets of cream were observed on a counter/storage area in the corridor across from two resident rooms. The medication cups were labeled with the room number and the body area for application, including sensitive areas such as the groin, big toe, and penis. The RN-Charge Nurse confirmed that she dispensed and left the treatments out for Certified Nurse Assistants (C.N.A.s) and labeled them accordingly.
Failure to Maintain Clean and Safe Dining and Kitchenette Areas
Penalty
Summary
During a tour of the D-Unit dining area, surveyors observed several deficiencies related to housekeeping and maintenance. The metal molding at the base of the kitchenette counter was found to be soiled with dried liquids. In the dining room, four floor tiles located at the outside wall across from the dishwasher room were cracked, resulting in an uncleanable surface. Additionally, two ceiling air vents—one over the middle dining tables and another next to the cooking area—were heavily soiled with dust. At the nurse's station, the protective plastic panel facing the dining room was cracked, missing pieces, and had sharp edges. These findings were confirmed by the Maintenance Assistant during the tour.
Insulin Doses Pre-Set and Verified Hours Before Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure insulin administration was performed correctly and in accordance with its medication administration policy for 2 of 3 sampled residents receiving insulin, including R33 and R30. The facility policy stated that when medications are administered from a central location, doses for the immediate administration time may be prepared no more than 60 minutes in advance, and the person who prepares the dose is the person who administers it. However, the facility’s practice for insulin pens was for the night shift to dial up the dose before the medication was due, and then the next nurse was expected to verify and administer it. For R33, the clinical record showed an order for Lantus insulin glargine 30 units sub-q daily at 9:00 a.m. with instructions to give half the dose if blood sugar was less than 120 and hold if less than 100. The TAR showed second-person verification time stamps from August 1 through August 13 occurring on the previous shift, ranging from 11:38 p.m. to 4:15 a.m., up to 9.5 hours before the scheduled 9:00 a.m. dose. The DON stated the previous shift dialed up the insulin pen dose and the next nurse was supposed to verify it before administration. During a medication pass observation, RN2 stated the night shift had already set the insulin pen dose for R30, and the surveyor observed the pen was pre-set to the dose when RN2 opened the baggy.
Ware Washer Leaking in D-Unit Kitchenette
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a ware washer was maintained in good repair and in safe operating condition on 1 of 2 units, the D-Unit. During observation on 8/11/25 at 11:45 a.m., a surveyor saw a wet bath blanket on the floor in front of the ware washer in the D-Unit kitchenette. A Food Service Worker placed dirty dishes in the ware washer and turned it on, and hot, steaming water spewed out from the bottom of the washer door onto the bath towel on the floor. In an interview at that time, the FSW stated that it had been that way for a while. Later that day, during an interview with a surveyor, another FSW stated that the dishwasher leaked, which was why towels were on the floor, and said it had been that way since she had been employed there about a month.
Baseline Care Plan Not Developed Within 48 Hours
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a Baseline Care Plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours of admission for one resident who was admitted in July 2025 and had Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus with insulin dependence and End Stage Renal Disease with dependence on renal dialysis. Clinical record review on 8/14/25 found no evidence that the baseline care plan included the instructions needed to provide minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the resident, including problems, goals, and interventions for monitoring and treatment of diabetes, insulin use, and dialysis. During interview, the B-unit Manager stated the facility does not formulate a Baseline Care Plan separate from the Comprehensive Care Plan and that diabetic residents should have a care plan for diabetes and other needs such as insulin and dialysis, which is then updated over time as needed. The surveyor confirmed the care plan was not developed and implemented within 48 hours of admission for the resident’s diabetes, insulin medication, or ESRD with dialysis dependence.
Missing Comprehensive Care Plan for Diabetes and Dialysis Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a Comprehensive Care Plan that addressed the physical needs of 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis, identified as a resident with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus with insulin dependence and End Stage Renal Disease with dependence on renal dialysis. The resident’s physician orders included insulin treatment, blood glucose checks four times per day, instructions to call the provider if blood sugar was higher than 500 with two specified symptoms, and daily monitoring and interventions for a right arm AV fistula, including palpating for thrill, auscultating for bruit, avoiding blood pressures and blood draws from the right arm, and notifying the dialysis center immediately if the site began to drain or the resident complained of numbness or pain. The clinical record lacked evidence that the Comprehensive Care Plan was developed and implemented to include problems, goals, and interventions for monitoring and treatment of the resident’s Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and/or End Stage Renal Disease with dialysis dependence. During interview and record review, the B-unit Manager stated the facility does not formulate a Baseline Care Plan separate from the Comprehensive Care Plan and stated that if a resident is diabetic on admission, they should have a care plan for diabetes and/or other needs such as insulin and dialysis. The surveyor confirmed that the Comprehensive Care Plan was not developed and implemented to include the resident’s diabetes and dialysis-related needs.
Failure to Follow Insulin Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow physician orders for insulin administration for 2 of 3 sampled residents. For one resident, a surveyor observed a medication pass in which RN1 administered Insulin Aspart after changing a pre-set insulin pen from 5 units to 6 units. When the resident’s clinical record was reviewed shortly afterward, the physician order was found to be for 5 units, not 6 units, and RN1 confirmed the discrepancy. For another resident, the clinical record showed two orders dated 7/22/25 for Lantus Insulin Glargine: 30 units daily at 9:00 a.m. and 26 units at HS, both with instructions to give 1/2 dose if blood sugar was less than 120 and to hold if blood sugar was less than 100. Review of the treatment summary report showed that on multiple occasions when blood sugar readings were 107, 115, and 118, the resident received the full ordered doses instead of the reduced 1/2 doses specified in the orders. The DON confirmed there was no evidence in the record that the correct doses were given in relation to the blood sugar results, and the surveyor and nurse clinical support reviewed the treatment administration record and nursing notes and confirmed the findings.
Infection Control Lapses in Kitchenette and Medication Preparation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain its Infection Control Program designed to provide a sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection when a water-soaked bath blanket was left on the floor in front of the ware washer in the D-Unit kitchenette. During observation, a Food Service Worker placed dirty dishes in the ware washer and turned it on, and hot, steaming water spewed out from the bottom of the washer door onto the bath towel on the floor. The Food Service Worker stated it had been that way for a while, and the wet blanket remained on the floor during a later observation. The DON/IP later confirmed that the wet blanket left on the floor was an infection control concern and would be removed. In a separate observation, a CNA-M prepared medications for a resident, popped a pill from a medication card, allowed it to fall onto a piece of paper on the medication cart, then picked it up with bare hands and placed it into the medication cup with the other medications.
Incomplete and Inaccurate Resident Record Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident record contained accurate and complete information for Resident #7 related to hospitalization documentation. On 8/12/25, a surveyor reviewed Third Eye Health documentation in R7’s clinical record that had a service date and time of 8/10/25 at 9:17 a.m. Central Time; the first page identified R7 and listed a Primary Chief Complaint of transfer notification, and page 3 contained R7’s patient data. However, the second page of the same document, which included the summary with chief complaint, orders and follow up, and disposition, listed another person’s name who did not reside in the facility. During interviews, the D Unit Manager stated she would check into it, then stated the documentation belonged to a non-resident and that the provider had been contacted to correct the documentation by removing R7 from it. The Administrator later confirmed that staff could have identified the issue when filing the papers if all pages had been reviewed.
Failure to Protect Residents from Sexual, Verbal, and Physical Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to assess a resident with vascular dementia and under guardianship for the ability to consent to sexual behavior with another resident who had a known history of hypersexual behaviors. Multiple incidents occurred where the resident with dementia was found in compromising situations with the other resident, including being found in the other resident's room with the door barricaded and appearing distressed. Despite clear documentation that the resident lacked capacity to consent, the facility did not conduct an assessment or report the incidents as potential sexual abuse, instead labeling the interactions as consensual. Additionally, the facility failed to protect residents from verbal and physical abuse by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). Over the course of several weeks, a CNA was reported by a colleague to have repeatedly used profane and threatening language towards residents, forcefully grabbed residents, and instructed others on how to physically restrain residents using inappropriate methods. One resident was found with a large bruise on the thigh, consistent with the method described by the CNA, and there was no evidence of a fall or other explanation for the injury. The abusive behavior was witnessed on multiple occasions, and the CNA continued to work for 36 shifts after the initial incidents were observed due to delayed reporting. The facility's internal investigations and interviews confirmed that residents were not free from potential sexual, verbal, and physical abuse. The administration acknowledged the failure to ensure resident safety and did not report the sexual abuse incident to the appropriate authorities. The lack of timely assessment, intervention, and reporting contributed to an immediate jeopardy situation for the residents involved.
Failure to Timely Report and Investigate Abuse and Injuries
Penalty
Summary
Staff failed to immediately report allegations of psychological, physical, verbal, and sexual abuse for multiple residents, as well as an injury of unknown origin. Specifically, a CNA witnessed another CNA being verbally and physically abusive to several residents over a period of three weeks to a month but did not report the incidents promptly, allowing the alleged abuser to continue working and potentially subjecting residents to further abuse. The delay in reporting was confirmed during interviews, with the witnessing CNA stating she was afraid of the alleged abuser. Additionally, an injury of unknown origin involving a significant bruise was not reported or investigated as required. Further, the facility did not notify the appropriate authorities of a potential sexual abuse incident involving two residents, nor did they report observed resident fear and behavioral changes that could indicate abuse. These failures were identified through review of internal investigations, staff statements, clinical records, and interviews, all of which confirmed that the required immediate reporting and investigation protocols were not followed for the incidents in question.
Failure to Investigate Injury of Unknown Origin
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin for one resident. During a clinical record review, a nursing note documented a bruise measuring 15 cm by 7.5 cm on the back of the right thigh, with an additional note specifying the location as the back right hip/upper thigh area. The clinical record did not contain any evidence that this bruising, which was of unknown origin, was investigated by the facility. This was confirmed during an interview with a Unit Manager RN, who acknowledged that no investigation had been conducted regarding the injury.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Case Review
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow physician orders for a resident who exhibited sexually inappropriate behaviors. The clinical record shows that the resident had multiple physician orders requiring the case to be presented to a specific doctor (DR1) on two separate occasions, as well as medication adjustments for managing the resident's behaviors. Despite these orders, there was no evidence found in the clinical record that the resident's case was ever presented to DR1 as directed. Interviews confirmed that DR1 was no longer available, and there was no documentation of any follow-up or alternative action taken regarding the required physician review. The resident in question had a history of escalating sexually inappropriate behaviors, which led to changes in medication and room assignment to prevent further incidents. The lack of compliance with the physician's orders, specifically the failure to present the case to DR1 or document any follow-up, persisted for over 120 days after the initial order. This deficiency was identified through clinical record review and staff interviews, which confirmed the absence of required documentation and follow-up actions.
Care Plan Not Updated for Resident's Cognitive Ability to Consent
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a care plan was resident-centered and accurately updated for a resident with vascular dementia. The clinical record showed that the care plan, last updated on 2/26/25, identified dementia as a care area but did not include a goal. An approach added on 1/31/25 addressed potential sexual behaviors, outlining steps for staff to take if such behaviors occurred, including assessment, redirection, and notification of supervisors. However, the care plan did not address the resident's cognitive ability to consent to sexual activity, despite the diagnosis of dementia. During an interview, it was confirmed that the care plan was not updated or implemented to meet the resident's needs, as it failed to consider the resident's inability to consent due to cognitive impairment.
Deficiencies in Food Storage and Pest Control
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards in food storage and preparation, as evidenced by two key observations. During a kitchen tour, it was noted that 30 cereal bowls and 30 small white bowls were improperly stored in a wet stacked/nestled manner, which can lead to contamination. Additionally, fruit flies were observed near the baking station area, emanating from and around the floor drain, indicating a lack of proper pest control measures. Furthermore, during a meal observation in the East Wing dining room on the B Unit, two unopened 1% milk cartons were found with expired dates, which was confirmed by a Registered Nurse, highlighting a lapse in monitoring food expiration dates.
Inaccurate and Incomplete Documentation of Neurological Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that resident records contained accurate, complete, and readily accessible information for three residents who experienced falls. The facility's policy required neurological assessments to be completed and documented in the electronic medical record (ECS) after any incident or fall where a head injury was suspected. However, for Resident #84, the neurological assessments were not documented in the clinical record at the time they occurred, with significant delays in documentation noted. Similarly, for Resident #74, the assessments were not documented at the time they occurred, and there were inconsistencies in the documentation, such as missing vital signs and extra checks not listed on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). Resident #7's clinical record lacked evidence of neurological assessments after two unwitnessed falls. Staff members reported that initial assessments and vitals were documented in a fall packet but were discarded before being recorded in the ECS. The Director of Nursing and other staff confirmed that post-fall investigations and documentation were not consistently completed or retained, leading to incomplete medical records. Interviews with staff revealed that there was confusion and inconsistency in the process of documenting and retaining post-fall assessments. The Director of Nursing stated that a post-fall investigation should be completed within 20 minutes, involving multiple staff members, but acknowledged that assessments might be discarded if staff felt it was not a fall. This practice resulted in incomplete and inaccurate medical records, failing to meet the facility's policy and professional standards for maintaining resident-identifiable information.
Infection Control Deficiencies in Antibiotic Use and Glucometer Cleaning
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by their inability to analyze and follow up on known infections. During the months of June, July, and August 2024, there were a total of 60 documented facility-acquired infections that were prescribed antibiotics. However, the facility's infection report lacked evidence of analysis or follow-up on these infections. Interviews with the Director of Nursing and the Infection Preventionist revealed that while antibiotics are reviewed during monthly Antibiotic Stewardship meetings, there has been no effort to identify trends or root causes of the infections. The Infection Preventionist acknowledged the high antibiotic use and the lack of tracing or surveillance to determine the root cause of infections. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure proper cleaning of a shared glucometer between uses. A surveyor observed a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) using a shared glucometer to check blood sugar levels on two residents consecutively without cleaning the device in between. During an interview, the CNA admitted to sometimes forgetting to clean the glucometer, despite having the necessary cleaning supplies available. This oversight in infection control practices was confirmed by the surveyor during the observation.
Failure to Implement Antibiotic Stewardship Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement its Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) as outlined in its policy, which aims to optimize antibiotic use and prevent multi-drug resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile infections. The policy requires tracking and trending of antibiotic use, but the facility did not adhere to these protocols. The review of the facility's infection reports for June, July, and August 2024 showed numerous facility-acquired infections treated with antibiotics, yet there was no evidence that these antibiotic prescriptions were reviewed or discussed. Additionally, the Quality Pharmacy Reports for several quarters lacked evidence of antibiotic use review during meetings. Interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Infection Preventionist (IP) revealed further deficiencies. The DON admitted that while the infection report is reviewed during monthly ASP meetings, trends or root causes were not analyzed. The DON also confirmed that antibiotic stewardship was not discussed in Quality Assurance and Process Improvement (QAPI) meetings. The IP acknowledged a high level of antibiotic use and noted that many prescriptions did not meet established criteria, and there was no prior discussion of antibiotic use with providers or implementation of tracking systems.
Inadequate Meal Service and Communication Affect Resident Dignity
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the dignity of residents during meal service in the B Unit dining rooms. During lunch observation, a surveyor noted that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was standing while assisting a resident with eating due to a lack of available chairs. Additionally, there were significant delays in meal service, with some residents receiving their meals much later than their tablemates. For instance, one resident received their meal at 12:43 p.m., while their tablemates had not been served by 12:55 p.m. The kitchen staff was observed bringing trays without clear direction, leading to disorganized meal service. In another instance, a resident requested a sliced turkey sandwich but stopped eating when it was not provided. A Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) publicly discussed the resident's medication, diagnosis, and dietary restrictions, which compromised the resident's dignity. Furthermore, during breakfast observation, two residents were served last at their table, with staff prioritizing other tables first. These observations were confirmed with the Administrator, highlighting a pattern of inadequate meal service and communication that affected residents' dignity.
Failure to Update PASRR and Notify State Mental Health Authority
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the State mental health authority for Pre-Admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) after admitting a resident with a mental health diagnosis. The resident's clinical record included a PASRR evaluation completed by the hospital, which indicated that no PASRR level II was required, despite the resident having a mental health diagnosis of anxiety. Upon admission, the resident's clinical record was updated to include diagnoses of Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and anxiety disorder. However, the PASRR was not updated to reflect these diagnoses, and the State mental health authority was not notified. This oversight was confirmed during an interview with the Licensed Social Worker.
Failure to Address Hearing Needs in Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to update and implement a comprehensive care plan addressing the communication needs of a resident with a hearing deficit. The resident, who was admitted with a diagnosis requiring the use of hearing aids, had a care plan updated on 6/21/24 that identified impaired communication but did not include specific goals and interventions for hearing loss or the use of hearing aids. A review of the Minimum Data Set confirmed the resident's need for hearing aids. Additionally, a Physician Order Sheet dated 7/12/24 indicated an ENT referral for right ear pain and a ruptured tympanic membrane. During an interview, the Director of Nursing acknowledged the omission of hearing-related goals and interventions in the care plan.
Failure to Conduct Neurological Assessments After Unwitnessed Falls
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete neurological assessments after unwitnessed falls for a resident diagnosed with Vascular Dementia. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment as indicated by a BIMS score of 1 and 3 on separate assessments, experienced two unwitnessed falls. Despite the facility's policy requiring neurological checks following any fall with a suspected head injury, the clinical record lacked evidence of follow-up assessments after these incidents. Staff interviews revealed that the falls were heard but not witnessed, and although initial fall assessments were started, they were discarded without being recorded in the electronic medical record. The Director of Nursing confirmed that a post-fall investigation should be completed within 20 minutes, involving input from multiple staff members and documentation of provider and family notifications. However, the resident's clinical record did not show that the required neurological assessments were conducted after the unwitnessed falls. This oversight indicates a failure to adhere to the facility's policies for managing falls and ensuring resident safety.
Failure to Address Significant Weight Loss in Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to recognize and address a potential significant weight loss for a resident diagnosed with dementia and abnormal weight loss. The resident was admitted with a weight of 111.4 pounds, and over the course of several months, experienced a weight decline to 100 pounds, indicating an 8% weight loss in one month and a 10.23% loss over four months. Despite the addition of a potential for unintended weight loss to the resident's care plan, there was no evidence that nursing staff notified the medical provider or registered dietitian, nor were nutritional interventions such as supplements initiated to address the weight loss.
Failure to Address Significant Weight Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's physician supervised and evaluated significant weight loss. The clinical record of a resident, who was admitted with a weight of 111.4 pounds, showed a decrease to 108.7 pounds and then to 100.0 pounds over a period of four months, indicating an 8% weight loss in one month and a 10.23% weight loss over four months. Despite this significant weight loss, there was no evidence in the clinical record that the provider was notified, nor were there any Provider Progress notes addressing the weight loss. This deficiency was confirmed during an interview with the B Unit Manager.
Failure to Timely Address Pharmacist Recommendations for PRN Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow up on pharmacist recommendations in a timely manner for a resident reviewed for unnecessary medications. On April 18, 2024, an order was placed for Trazodone 50 milligrams as needed (PRN) at bedtime for the resident, with no specified duration for the order. The pharmacist made recommendations on April 19, 2024, and May 16, 2024, indicating that the use of PRN antidepressants must be limited to 14 days unless the prescriber documents their rationale in the patient's medical record and specifies the duration for the PRN order. Despite these recommendations, the order was not discontinued until June 11, 2024. This finding was confirmed by the surveyor with the B Unit Manager.
Deficiencies in Antipsychotic Monitoring and PRN Medication Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its policy regarding the monitoring of antipsychotic medications through the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) for two residents. Resident 19 had a dose increase of Risperidone, an antipsychotic medication, but did not have an AIMS test completed at the time of the dosage change. The last AIMS test for this resident was conducted several months prior. Similarly, Resident 74, who was admitted with an order for Seroquel, another antipsychotic medication, did not have a baseline AIMS test recorded, and the most recent AIMS test was outdated. These oversights were confirmed during a review with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). Additionally, the facility did not ensure compliance with regulations regarding the use of PRN psychotropic medications. Resident 19 had an order for Trazodone, a PRN antidepressant, without a specified duration, which is required to be limited to 14 days unless a rationale and duration are documented by the prescriber. The order expired, but the resident received a dose after the expiration date, indicating a lapse in adherence to the facility's policy and regulatory requirements. This issue was confirmed during a review with the B Unit Manager.
Failure to Administer and Document Pneumococcal Vaccination
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper documentation and administration of a pneumococcal immunization for one of the five residents reviewed for immunizations. The clinical record of the resident showed a signed consent for the pneumococcal vaccine dated 11/6/23. However, there was no evidence in the medical record that the vaccination was actually administered. During an interview, the Education Coordinator confirmed that the resident had signed the consent form but did not receive the pneumococcal immunization.
Medication Administration Timing Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to physician orders for medication administration for one of the sampled residents, specifically regarding the timing and conditions under which medications were to be given. The facility's Medication Administration Procedure requires medications to be administered at specified times unless otherwise directed by physician services. However, the review of Resident #3's clinical records and interviews revealed multiple instances where medications were administered outside of the prescribed times. For example, Levothyroxine, which was ordered to be given at 7:00 a.m. on an empty stomach, was consistently administered after 8:00 a.m. Additionally, Sinemet, prescribed for Parkinsonism, was not given at the specified times and was sometimes administered with meals, contrary to the neurologist's instructions. The resident's family representative expressed concerns about the untimely administration of Parkinson's medication, which was confirmed by the Director of Nursing during an interview. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed several instances where Sinemet doses were given either too close together or at incorrect times, such as a 3:00 p.m. dose being administered at 5:15 p.m. and a 10:00 p.m. dose given at 8:56 p.m. These discrepancies indicate a failure to follow the specific timing and administration instructions provided by the resident's healthcare providers, leading to a deficiency in the facility's medication management practices.
Failure to Provide Dignified Feeding Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident requiring feeding assistance was treated in a dignified manner. During a breakfast tray pass, a resident was observed sitting in a Broda chair at the entrance to the dining area. A CNA placed the resident's breakfast tray on the tray table in front of them and walked away without assisting. The CNA continued to deliver trays to other residents and returned to the resident after 26 minutes, fed them two bites of food, and then walked away again. Later, the CNA collected the uneaten tray without speaking to the resident or asking if they wanted more food. This incident was discussed with the Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing.
Failure to Implement Care Plan for Resident with Self-Care Deficit and Nutritional Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement the care plan interventions for a resident with a self-care deficit and nutritional needs. The resident, diagnosed with dementia and dysphagia, was nonverbal and required assistance with eating. The care plan specified that the resident was dependent on one assist for eating, with instructions to alternate bites of food with sips of liquid and to reapproach if the resident refused a meal. Additionally, the nutrition care plan required staff to assist the resident with eating, set up foods as needed, feed all meals, and maintain eye contact during feeding. On the observed date, the resident was left unattended in a Broda chair with a meal tray placed in front of them by a CNA, who then walked away. The CNA later returned, attempted to feed the resident, who refused the food, and did not follow the care plan's instructions to offer fluids or reheat the food. The CNA only offered two spoonfuls of food before leaving again, and eventually collected the uneaten tray without further interaction with the resident. This lack of adherence to the care plan was discussed with the Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing.
Failure to Protect Resident from Physical Abuse by Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse by staff. A Certified Nursing Assistant (C.N.A.1) was reported to have held a resident's arms down during care, resulting in bruising on the resident's arms and causing the resident to become angry. The resident, diagnosed with dementia, anxiety, severe agitation, and psychosis, resides in a secured memory care unit. On the day of the incident, the resident was observed with new bruises on the left upper and lower forearm and the upper right arm. The resident accused C.N.A.1 of throwing them around, which was corroborated by another C.N.A. (C.N.A.2) who observed the bruises and reported the incident to the Registered Nurse-Nurse Manager (RN-NM). C.N.A.1 admitted to holding the resident's arm down on the toilet's safety rail during care to prevent the resident from hitting him. Interviews with other staff members, including C.N.A.2, the day Charge Nurse, and C.N.A.3, confirmed that the bruises were not present the day before the incident. C.N.A.3 also reported that the resident claimed C.N.A.1 had grabbed them. The facility's Abuse Policy defines physical abuse as actions that may cause pain, inability to move limbs, burns, cuts, internal injuries, marks, or bruises. The incident was identified as a failure to adhere to this policy, resulting in physical abuse of the resident by C.N.A.1.
Removal Plan
- The RN-NM terminated C.N.A.1.
- The Staff Development Coordinator and the Assistant Director of Nursing provided all direct care staff and licensed nurses on all the facility's Units on Resident Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation.
- Staff were in-serviced on 'Burn Out'.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 68 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Bangor
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eastside Center For Health & Rehabilitation, Llc | 0.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 16 | 0 |
| Stillwater Health Care | 1.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 12 | 0 |
| Ross Manor | 2.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Brewer Center For Health & Rehabilitation, Llc | 2.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
| Westgate Center For Rehab & Alzheimers Care | 3 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Maine Veterans Home - Bangor.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.