Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around September 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Copper Ridge Nursing And Assisted Living Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A cognitively impaired resident with a history of wandering and exit-seeking behaviors was able to leave the facility unsupervised after staff failed to recognize and intervene appropriately. Despite documented behaviors indicating risk, no interventions were put in place, and the resident was mistaken for a visitor by staff, allowing them to exit the building. The resident was later found by police and returned after a hospital evaluation.
A review of employee files revealed that several direct care staff, including GNAs and an RN, did not have documentation of required Effective Communication training. The HR Director and Corporate Nurse were unable to produce records confirming the training was completed, citing a lack of systematic record maintenance.
A review of employee files and staff interviews revealed that several staff members, including GNAs and a Dietary Aide, did not have documentation of receiving required QAPI program training. The HR Director and Corporate Nurse were unable to produce or verify records of this mandatory education due to unsystematic record-keeping.
The facility did not report allegations of abuse, injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property within the required 2-hour timeframe after staff became aware of the incidents. Two residents with unexplained bruising and one resident with a narcotic medication discrepancy experienced delays in reporting to the State Agency, as confirmed by facility documentation and staff interviews.
The facility did not complete required annual performance evaluations for its Geriatric Nursing Assistants, as confirmed by staff and a review of personnel files.
A review of staff files revealed that not all employees received required infection control training, with one staff member lacking documentation of completion. The HR Director and Corporate Nurse were unable to produce or verify records of this training due to unsystematic maintenance of education records.
The facility did not consistently conduct or document interdisciplinary care plan meetings in accordance with required timelines following MDS assessments. For several residents, care plan meetings were either missing or not properly documented to match assessment dates, and staff interviews revealed confusion about the required timing for these reviews.
A resident with high cognitive function was subjected to verbal abuse by an LPN, who spoke aggressively and loudly, causing the resident to become visibly upset and cry. Multiple staff witnessed the incident, and the facility's investigation confirmed the occurrence of verbal abuse.
Surveyors found that two residents were administered psychotropic medications without proper documentation, evaluation, or justification. One resident received PRN Lorazepam almost daily over several months without a 14-day limitation or ongoing assessment, while another was prescribed Rexulti for behavioral symptoms that were not documented in their records. Staff interviews confirmed the lack of observed or recorded behaviors to support the medication orders.
A resident was transferred to the hospital for chest pain, but the facility did not provide written notice of the bed hold policy to the resident or their representative at the time of transfer. Documentation reviewed included only a late entry progress note, a blank bed hold notice, and an undated letter, with no evidence that the required written notice was given.
A resident was not provided with a summary of their baseline care plan and medication list within 48 hours of admission, as required. Review of records and staff interviews confirmed that the necessary documentation and resident acknowledgment were missing, resulting in a deficiency.
Surveyors identified that two residents did not receive care according to physician orders. One resident with weight loss did not have weekly weights obtained as ordered, with some weights missing and others not taken on the specified days. Another resident had a magnesium lab ordered following a pharmacist's recommendation, but the lab was never completed and no results were found. These deficiencies were confirmed through record review and staff interviews.
Surveyors identified that two residents receiving controlled medications had discrepancies between the controlled substance count sheets and the MAR. Doses of Lorazepam and Oxycodone were recorded as administered on count sheets but were missing from the MAR, and in some cases, the timing and dosage could not be reconciled. Interviews with an LPN and the DON confirmed that documentation was incomplete and did not meet facility policy.
A deficiency was identified when facility staff failed to document and respond to a consulting pharmacist's recommendations regarding a resident's medication regimen in a timely manner. The DON kept pharmacy recommendations in a binder rather than in the medical record, and the relevant Monthly Medication Review was not available until prompted by the surveyor, indicating a lapse in following established procedures.
Nursing staff did not follow physician orders for two residents regarding medication administration. One resident received a cardiac medication despite blood pressure readings below the ordered threshold or without a blood pressure check, and another received pain medication when their reported pain level was below the ordered range. The DON acknowledged the errors during review.
A resident reported never having been seen by a dentist since admission and expressed ongoing dental issues. Clinical records confirmed the absence of dental consults, and the DON stated she was unaware of the resident's dental concerns, resulting in a lack of routine dental services.
Staff failed to promptly discard expired protein drinks in two unit-based kitchens, with one staff member returning expired Mighty Shakes to the refrigerator after being notified, while another staff member immediately discarded the expired product.
The facility did not consistently monitor or document antibiotic use, as required by its stewardship program. Two residents receiving antibiotics for urinary tract infections were not included in risk meeting records, and key information such as lab results, signs and symptoms, and antibiotic start and end dates was missing from both the stewardship binder and meeting minutes. The DON confirmed these documentation gaps during the survey.
Two residents were found to have incomplete or missing documentation regarding their influenza and pneumococcal vaccination status. One resident had no record of either vaccine upon admission, and another lacked documentation for the pneumococcal vaccine. The DON confirmed that staff should have obtained and recorded this information, but it was not present in the records reviewed.
Surveyors identified that two residents lacked proper documentation of their COVID-19 vaccination status in their medical records, and one direct care staff member did not have vaccination status documented at the time of hire. The DON confirmed these documentation gaps during the review process.
A resident's call bell was repeatedly found out of reach, first on the floor and later wedged under a wardrobe, making it inaccessible for the resident to request assistance. Staff were aware of the issue but could not immediately resolve it, resulting in the call system remaining unavailable for several days.
Failure to Prevent Elopement of Cognitively Impaired Resident
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a cognitively impaired resident from eloping. The resident, who had diagnoses including mild neurocognitive disorder with behavioral disturbance and cognitive communication deficit, was admitted with two physician certificates indicating incapacity to make medical decisions. Initial assessments did not identify the resident as an elopement risk, but subsequent BIMS assessments showed moderate to severe cognitive impairment. Nursing progress notes documented behaviors such as refusing care, agitation, wandering, exit seeking, and safety concerns, but no interventions were implemented to address these behaviors. On the morning of the incident, the resident was observed to be agitated, attempting to leave, and even tried to break a window. Staff were notified of the resident's behavior, and a GNA was asked to monitor the resident, but was not assigned to provide one-to-one supervision. The resident was able to access the elevator and reach the kitchen area, where dietary staff mistook the resident for a visitor and allowed them to exit the building. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident did not appear to be a resident and was able to leave the facility without proper verification of identity. The facility's investigation determined that staff failed to recognize and appropriately supervise a resident with exit-seeking behaviors, resulting in the resident eloping from the facility. The resident was later found by police at a gas station several miles away and returned to the facility after a hospital evaluation. The deficiency was attributed to the lack of effective supervision and failure to implement measures to address the resident's documented behaviors and risks.
Failure to Provide Mandatory Effective Communication Training to Direct Care Staff
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to ensure that all direct care staff received mandatory training on Effective Communication, as evidenced by a review of six employee files. Specifically, the files for three Geriatric Nursing Assistants and one Registered Nurse did not contain documentation showing completion of the required training. During the survey, the Human Resources Director was unable to provide evidence that the training had been completed for these staff members. Additionally, the Corporate Nurse confirmed that education records were not systematically maintained, making it impossible to determine if or when the training was provided.
Failure to Provide Mandatory QAPI Training to All Staff
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to ensure that all employees received mandatory training on the elements and goals of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. During an extended survey, a review of six employee files revealed that four staff members, including two Geriatric Nursing Assistants, a Dietary Aide, and another staff member, did not have documentation indicating they had received the required QAPI training. The Human Resources Director was unable to provide evidence that the training had been conducted, and the Corporate Nurse confirmed that education records were not systematically maintained, making it impossible to determine if or when the training was provided. These findings were based on direct review of staff files and interviews with facility personnel, which confirmed the lack of documentation and systematic record-keeping for mandatory QAPI training among the staff reviewed.
Failure to Timely Report Alleged Abuse, Injuries of Unknown Source, and Misappropriation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made. Specifically, for two residents with injuries of unknown origin, staff became aware of the incidents at 6:15 AM and 8:30 AM, but the initial self-reports to the State Agency were not sent until 11:51 AM and 11:31 AM, respectively, exceeding the required 2-hour reporting window. In both cases, the documentation confirmed the delay in reporting after staff became aware of the injuries. Additionally, an incident involving the alleged misappropriation of a resident's narcotic medication was not reported within the required timeframe. Staff identified a discrepancy in the medication records at 4:00 PM, but the initial self-report to the State Agency was not sent until nearly 24 hours later. These failures to report timely were acknowledged by the Nursing Home Administrator and relevant staff during interviews, with no further comments provided.
Failure to Complete Annual GNA Performance Reviews
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct yearly performance reviews for its Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) as required. During a complaint survey, a review of four GNA personnel files revealed that none contained evidence of annual performance evaluations. When the surveyor requested the performance reviews, facility staff, including Human Resources and a Corporate RN, confirmed that they were unable to locate any documentation indicating that these evaluations had been completed within the past 12 months. This deficiency was identified for all four GNA employee files reviewed.
Failure to Ensure Mandatory Infection Control Training for All Staff
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to ensure that all employees received mandatory training for the Infection Control program, as required by the facility's infection prevention and control policies. During a review of six staff files, it was found that one staff member did not have documentation indicating completion of the required infection control training. The Human Resources Director was unable to provide evidence that the training was completed for this staff member, despite multiple attempts to locate the records. Additionally, the Corporate Nurse confirmed that education records were not systematically maintained, making it impossible to determine if or when the training was provided.
Failure to Conduct and Document Timely Interdisciplinary Care Plan Meetings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct and document care plan meetings of the interdisciplinary team for residents at the time of quarterly revisions of their care plans, as required. Review of medical records and interviews revealed that for four out of six residents reviewed, there was either no documentation of care plan meetings or the documentation did not align with the timing of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. Specifically, care plan meetings were not held or not documented within the required timeframes following quarterly or annual MDS assessments, and sign-in sheets or progress notes did not consistently match the assessment dates. Interviews with facility staff, including the DON and MDS coordinator, confirmed that care plan meetings should be scheduled in relation to MDS assessments and involve an interdisciplinary team. However, discrepancies were found between staff statements and actual practice, with staff unable to provide clear answers regarding the required timing for care plan reviews after MDS assessments. The deficiency was validated by the DON when concerns were presented by surveyors.
Verbal Abuse of Resident by LPN
Penalty
Summary
A resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 experienced verbal abuse from an LPN. The incident occurred when the LPN spoke aggressively and loudly to the resident after the resident asked a question, resulting in the resident becoming visibly upset and crying. The resident later reported feeling angry and hurt during a psychological supportive care session. Multiple staff members provided written statements confirming that the LPN used an aggressive tone and loud voice when addressing the resident. The facility's investigation, including witness interviews and review of the resident's medical record, substantiated that verbal abuse had occurred. The Nursing Home Administrator concluded that the incident constituted verbal abuse based on the evidence collected.
Failure to Ensure Proper Use and Monitoring of Psychotropic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure compliance with regulations regarding the use of psychotropic medications for two residents. For one resident with dementia, depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder, Lorazepam was ordered and administered as needed (PRN) over an extended period, with orders being renewed continuously from March through June. The medication was given almost daily, sometimes twice a day, without a documented 14-day limitation for PRN use as required. After an initial psychiatric evaluation in April noting the medication's effectiveness, there was no further documented evaluation or rationale for the continued use of Lorazepam, despite its frequent administration. For another resident, a psychotropic medication (Rexulti) was ordered for behavior management related to dementia. However, review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) and treatment administration records over several months showed no documented behavioral symptoms or incidents that would justify the use of such medication. Staff interviews confirmed that behaviors were not observed or documented during this period, and the psychiatric nurse practitioner acknowledged that the order was based on a single observation of agitation and confusion, with no subsequent behavioral incidents recorded. These findings demonstrate that the facility did not ensure psychotropic medications were prescribed and administered in accordance with regulatory requirements, including proper documentation, ongoing evaluation, and justification for continued use. The lack of appropriate monitoring and documentation resulted in residents receiving unnecessary medications or medications without the required oversight.
Failure to Provide Written Bed Hold Policy Notice Upon Hospital Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide written notice of the bed hold policy to a resident or their representative when the resident was transferred to the hospital. Review of the medical record showed that the resident was transferred for evaluation of chest pain, but there was no evidence that written notice of the bed hold policy was given at the time of transfer. The surveyor requested documentation, but the only evidence provided was a late entry progress note stating that the resident and family were notified verbally, a blank bed hold notice form, and an undated letter with a handwritten note indicating it was mailed to the resident's daughter. During an interview, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that the facility's process is to provide the bed hold policy before a resident leaves for transfer and to keep a copy of the notice. However, the NHA was unable to produce any written evidence that the required notice was given to the resident or their representative at the time of transfer. The surveyor confirmed that the documentation provided did not meet the requirement for written notice.
Failure to Provide Baseline Care Plan and Medication Summary Upon Admission
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was provided with a summary of their baseline care plan (BLCP), including a list of medications, within 48 hours of admission. Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence that the BLCP or a summary of medications was given to the resident or their representative as required. The BLCP document for the resident was found, but the section for the resident or representative's signature and date, which would confirm receipt of the information, was left blank. Interviews with the DON and NHA confirmed that there was no documentation to show the resident received the BLCP and medication summary within the required timeframe. The deficiency was identified during a recertification/complaint survey, and the lack of proper documentation and resident acknowledgment led to the finding.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Weights and Lab Tests
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow physician orders for two residents as identified during a recertification and complaint survey. For one resident with documented weight loss, medical records showed that weekly weights were ordered to be obtained every Sunday for two separate four-week periods. However, weights were either missing or not obtained on the specified days as ordered. Specifically, two out of four required weights were not obtained during the first period, and the remaining weights were not taken on the correct day. In the second period, one required weight was missing, and the others were not obtained on the ordered day. These findings were confirmed by the Nursing Home Administrator during a review of the records. For another resident, a medication regimen review conducted by a pharmacist resulted in a recommendation to order a serum magnesium level, which was agreed to and signed by the provider. An order for the magnesium level was subsequently placed, but there was no evidence in the medical record that the lab was completed or that results were obtained. The Director of Nursing confirmed that no lab results were available for the ordered test. These deficiencies were identified through review of medical records and staff interviews.
Failure to Reconcile Controlled Substance Administration Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that drug records for controlled substances were maintained in a manner that allowed for reconciliation between dispensed and administered medications. During a review of medical records and controlled medication count sheets for two residents, multiple discrepancies were identified. For one resident prescribed Lorazepam 0.5 mg as needed for anxiety, the count sheet indicated doses were administered on two occasions, but there was no corresponding documentation in the Medication Administration Record (MAR). For another resident admitted for recovery from a pelvic fracture and prescribed Oxycodone for pain management, the count sheet documented several administrations of both 5 mg and 10 mg doses, but these were not reflected in the MAR, and in one instance, the timing and dosage could not be reconciled between the two records. Interviews with an LPN and the Director of Nursing confirmed that facility policy requires controlled medication administrations to be documented accurately and consistently on both the count sheet and the MAR. The discrepancies found during the survey indicated that this process was not followed, as the records for the administration of controlled substances could not be reconciled, leading to a deficiency in pharmaceutical services for the residents involved.
Failure to Timely Document and Respond to Pharmacy Recommendations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to document and respond to recommendations made by consulting pharmacists in a timely manner for one resident reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The DON described the process for handling pharmacy recommendations, which involved printing and placing them in a binder in her office rather than in the resident's medical record or electronic chart. During the survey, the DON was unable to locate the relevant Monthly Medication Review (MRR) for the resident in question, and it was later revealed that the MRR had been held by a staff member until the day before the surveyor's inquiry. There was no documentation in the resident's record to show that the pharmacy's recommendation had been reviewed or acted upon prior to the surveyor's intervention. The deficiency was identified through medical record review and staff interviews, which showed that the facility did not follow its own procedures for timely documentation and response to pharmacy recommendations. The lack of documentation and delayed response to the pharmacist's recommendations regarding the resident's medication regimen, specifically concerning eligibility for Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR), was confirmed by the DON. This failure was evident for one out of five residents reviewed during the survey.
Failure to Administer Medications According to Physician Orders
Penalty
Summary
Facility nursing staff failed to administer medications according to physician orders for two residents. For one resident, the physician ordered Metoprolol 50 mg to be given twice daily, with instructions to hold the medication if the systolic blood pressure was less than 110 or the heart rate was less than 60. On two occasions, the medication was administered despite the resident's blood pressure being below the specified threshold or not being checked at all prior to administration. There were no progress notes documenting the rationale for administering the medication against the ordered parameters. For another resident, the physician ordered Oxycodone 5 mg to be given every six hours as needed for pain, only if the resident rated their pain between 5 and 10 on a 0 to 10 scale, and to hold for sedation, decreased respirations, or altered mental status. The medication was administered on three occasions when the resident reported a pain level of 4, which was outside the ordered parameters. The DON acknowledged these findings during an interview and was uncertain about when staff education on this issue had last occurred.
Failure to Provide Routine Dental Services
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to ensure that a resident received routine dental services. The resident, who was interviewed, reported never having been seen by a dentist since admission and expressed ongoing dental issues and a desire for care. A review of the clinical record confirmed that the resident had not received any dental consults since admission. During an interview, the DON stated there were no dental consults in the record because she was unaware of any dental problems and believed the resident did not have issues. The surveyor clarified that the resident had reported dental concerns and emphasized that routine dental visits should occur regardless of reported problems.
Expired Nutritional Shakes Not Discarded Promptly
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to discard protein drinks that were past their use by date in two out of three unit-based kitchens observed during a recertification/complaint survey. During a tour of the Eastern Shore nursing unit kitchen, two 4-ounce cartons of vanilla reduced sugar Mighty Shake with a use by date of 5/30/25 were found in the refrigerator, and the staff member present stated she would take care of it but appeared to return them to the refrigerator. In the Baltimore nursing unit kitchen, one 4-ounce carton of the same product, also past its use by date, was found and immediately discarded by the staff member present. The Dietary Manager was informed of these findings and confirmed that the expired Mighty Shakes had been discarded after the surveyor's notification. No information about specific residents, their medical history, or their condition at the time of the deficiency was provided in the report.
Inadequate Monitoring and Documentation of Antibiotic Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adequately monitor and track antibiotic use among residents, as evidenced by record reviews and staff interviews. The antibiotic stewardship program was found to be lacking in consistent and complete documentation. Although the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that antibiotic use was discussed in daily clinical, weekly risk, and monthly QAPI meetings, the stewardship binder and meeting minutes reviewed by the surveyor contained incomplete or missing information. Key details such as resident admission dates, lab results, signs and symptoms, antibiotic start and end dates, and side effects were frequently absent from the records. The DON indicated that some of the documentation was maintained by the pharmacist and that reviews were conducted through the electronic medical record system, but this information was not consistently reflected in the meeting minutes or stewardship binder. Specifically, two residents who were prescribed antibiotics for urinary tract infections were not listed in the facility's risk meeting minutes, and their antibiotic use was not adequately tracked in the available documentation. The DON acknowledged these gaps when questioned by the surveyor. The lack of comprehensive and consistent monitoring and documentation of antibiotic use led to the identified deficiency in the facility's antibiotic stewardship program.
Failure to Screen and Document Flu and Pneumococcal Vaccinations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adequately screen and document the vaccination status for influenza (Flu) and pneumococcal vaccines for two out of five residents whose immunization records were reviewed during a recertification and complaint survey. Specifically, one resident admitted in January 2025 had no documented record for either the Flu or Pneumococcal vaccine. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that staff should have offered the Flu vaccine and obtained the pneumococcal vaccination status upon admission, but there was no data available for this resident. Another resident, admitted in May 2025, also lacked documentation of their pneumococcal vaccine status. When questioned, the DON indicated she would look for additional information, but no further documentation was provided. These findings demonstrate a failure by the facility to ensure proper screening and documentation of required vaccinations for eligible residents as per CDC recommendations.
Failure to Document COVID-19 Vaccination Status for Residents and Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper documentation of COVID-19 vaccination status for both residents and staff, as identified during a recertification and complaint survey. For two residents, one admitted in May 2025 and another in August 2023, there was either no documentation of COVID-19 vaccination status in the medical record or missing information regarding primary vaccination, despite a recorded refusal of a booster dose. The absence of this documentation was confirmed through medical record review and interviews with the DON, who acknowledged the gaps when questioned by the surveyor. Additionally, a review of employee health files revealed that one staff member hired in December 2024 for direct resident care did not have documentation of COVID-19 vaccination status at the time of hire. Although a declination form was later provided, it was signed only after the surveyor's inquiry, indicating the facility did not have this information on file as required. These findings demonstrate lapses in the facility's process for tracking and recording COVID-19 vaccination status for both residents and staff.
Resident Call Bell Inaccessible in Room and Bathroom
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all residents had access to a functioning call system, as observed during the recertification and complaint survey. Specifically, one resident's call bell was found on the floor and out of reach while the resident was in bed during the initial screening. Subsequent observations revealed that the call bell remained inaccessible, having become wedged under the resident's wardrobe. Staff were made aware of the issue but were unable to immediately resolve it, and the call bell remained out of reach for several days. The deficiency was confirmed through direct observation and staff interviews, with the Nursing Home Administrator being notified of the ongoing issue.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,810 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Sykesville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willowbrooke Court Skilled Care Center Fairhaven | 0.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare At Birch Manor | 0.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Chapel Hill Nursing Center | 6.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 27 | 0 |
| Encore At Turf Valley | 6.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Mount Airy Nursing And Rehab Center | 8.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 31 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Copper Ridge Nursing And Assisted Living Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.