Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Manor Court Of Maryville during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and dementia reported being pushed by a CNA. Although the facility investigated and found the allegation unfounded, the required report to state authorities was not made because the administrator, who was solely responsible for reporting, was absent due to illness.
A resident with multiple complex medical conditions was admitted with a detailed hospital discharge medication list, but the facility failed to accurately transcribe and administer all prescribed medications, including Furosemide. The standard process of having two nurses review orders and an auditing nurse follow up was not completed because the auditing nurse was on vacation, and the omission was not detected until the resident's family raised concerns. This resulted in the resident not receiving all required medications as ordered.
The facility failed to maintain safe food temperatures, serving meals below the required 135°F to residents on pureed and mechanical diets. A non-functional handwashing sink and improper food handling by a dishwasher contributed to the deficiency, as confirmed by the dietician and facility policy.
A hospice aide was observed by an LPN striking a resident with Alzheimer's disease on both sides of the head. The aide claimed she was trying to prevent the resident from biting her. The incident was reported to facility management and the police. The resident's care plan did not address abuse, and the facility's abuse policy defines such actions as physical abuse.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and mobility dependence fell and fractured her kneecap, but the facility failed to update her care plan with new interventions. The Care Plan Coordinator was unaware of the incident, and the facility's policy on documenting and investigating accidents was not followed.
A resident with dementia and overactive bladder experienced increased confusion, prompting a physician's order for a urine test. However, the initial specimen was not picked up due to a lab technician's absence, delaying diagnosis and treatment. A second sample was collected days later, revealing a UTI. Improper perineal care was also observed, potentially contributing to the resident's condition.
Failure to Report Alleged Abuse to Authorities
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse involving a resident with severe cognitive impairment and a diagnosis of unspecified dementia with anxiety. The resident, who was always incontinent and had no verbal or physical impairment, reported being pushed by a CNA. Although the facility staff investigated the allegation and determined it was unfounded, the incident was not reported to the Illinois Department of Public Health as required by facility policy. The administrator, who was responsible for reporting, was out due to illness and was the only individual with access to make the report, resulting in the failure to notify authorities within the mandated timeframe.
Failure to Transcribe and Administer Discharge Medication Orders
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to correctly transcribe and administer discharge medication orders for one resident following admission and readmission from the hospital. The resident, who had diagnoses including osteomyelitis of the thoracic vertebra, chronic systolic heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, was admitted with a complex medication regimen that included antidepressants, anticoagulants, opioids, antibiotics, and other medications. Hospital discharge records specified which medications to continue, hold, or discontinue, but these orders were not fully or accurately entered into the facility's electronic medication administration record (eMAR). The error was discovered after the resident's family raised concerns about a missing medication, specifically Furosemide (Lasix), which was not being administered as ordered. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the standard process involved two nurses reviewing discharge orders and an auditing nurse conducting a follow-up review. However, during the resident's admission, the auditing nurse was on vacation, and the review process was not completed as intended. As a result, the resident did not receive all prescribed medications, and the omission was not identified until brought to staff attention by the resident's family. Staff interviews confirmed that the hospital discharge medications were not entered into the system, and the nurse practitioner only became aware of the missing medication after being notified by the resident's son. The facility's established check and balance system for medication order transcription failed due to the absence of the auditing nurse, and the responsibility for reviewing admissions was not reassigned, leading to the medication error.
Failure to Maintain Safe Food Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in a manner that prevents potential contamination for four residents reviewed for food sanitation. During an observation in the kitchen, it was noted that a handwashing sink was not operational, as no water would come out of the faucet. Additionally, the dishwasher, identified as V4, was responsible for taking the temperatures of food items on the steam table. The recorded temperatures for mashed potatoes, chicken, pureed meat, pureed vegetables, and gravy were all below the required 135 degrees Fahrenheit. Despite this, V4 proceeded to serve the food without reheating it to the appropriate temperature. The dietician, V37, later confirmed that food temperatures should be taken before service and any food below 135 degrees Fahrenheit should be reheated to 165 degrees Fahrenheit to prevent bacterial growth and potential foodborne illness. The facility's Food Service/Holding Temperature Policy also mandates that cooked meat, vegetables, soups, gravy, or broths should be held at 135 degrees or higher. The deficiency was observed in the meals served to residents who were on pureed and/or mechanical diets, highlighting a failure in adhering to food safety protocols.
Failure to Prevent Resident Abuse by Hospice Aide
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prevent physical abuse of a resident, identified as R54, who was under hospice care and had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, among other conditions. The incident involved a hospice aide, V7, who was observed by a Licensed Practical Nurse, V6, striking R54 on both sides of the head. V6 reported that upon entering the room, she witnessed V7 slapping R54 with an open hand, creating a 'slapping' sound. V7 claimed she was pushing R54's head away to prevent being bitten. The incident was reported to the facility management and the local police department, and a police officer documented the event as an aggravated battery. R54's care plan did not address abuse, and the facility's abuse policy defines abuse as the willful infliction of injury or punishment resulting in physical harm or mental anguish. The policy includes physical abuse acts such as hitting and slapping. Despite the incident, R54 was assessed for injuries, and none were noted, with the resident appearing calm and showing no signs of distress. The facility's failure to prevent this incident highlights a deficiency in protecting residents from abuse, as required by their policies.
Failure to Update Care Plan After Resident Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement progressive interventions to prevent falls for a resident who experienced a fall resulting in a fracture. The resident, who is severely cognitively impaired and dependent on assistance for mobility and hygiene, was found on the floor near her bed, complaining of pain and with visible bruising. She was diagnosed with a small fracture to her left kneecap and returned to the facility with an immobilizer. Despite this incident, the resident's care plan was not updated with new interventions to address the increased fall risk. The Care Plan Coordinator was unaware of the resident's fall and subsequent fracture, indicating a lapse in communication and documentation. The facility's policy requires that all accidents and incidents be documented and investigated to prevent future occurrences. However, the resident's care plan, which included interventions such as orienting the resident to her surroundings and encouraging the use of side rails, was not revised following the fall. This oversight highlights a failure to adhere to the facility's policy and ensure adequate supervision and preventive measures for residents at risk of falls.
Delayed Diagnostic Testing for UTI
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to perform a diagnostic test in a timely manner to diagnose and treat a urinary tract infection (UTI) for a resident with multiple health conditions, including dementia and overactive bladder. The resident, who required substantial assistance with activities of daily living, exhibited confusion over several days, which was noted by both the nursing staff and the resident's spouse. Despite the physician's order to collect a urine sample for analysis due to the resident's confusion, the initial specimen collected on June 27 was not picked up by the lab technician, who was off that day. Consequently, the urine sample was not processed, and the resident's confusion persisted. A second urine specimen was collected on July 2, but it was not until July 3 that the lab received the sample for analysis. The urinalysis results, dated July 5, indicated abnormal findings consistent with a UTI. During this period, the resident's spouse reported increased confusion and disorientation, which had started a week prior. Additionally, an observation of perineal care revealed improper technique by the CNAs, which could contribute to the resident's condition. The facility's policy mandates prompt and convenient diagnostic services, but the delay in obtaining and processing the urine sample indicates a failure to adhere to this policy.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 692 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 26 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Maryville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Au Well Care Home, Inc | 2.1 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Eden Village Care Center | 2.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Meridian Village Care Center | 3.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| La Bella Of Edwardsville | 3.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Evercare At Edwardsville | 4.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 2 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Manor Court Of Maryville.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.